A bit misleading as it has the lead at the 1/8, but the Porsche is gaining fast and will beat it in the 1/4 which is why the video does not show the entire race.
Don't forget everyone, including Elon, stated it's in the 1/4 mile. The Cybertruck performance is impressive. However, can't stand the misleading advertisement and, for that reason, will never buy a Tesla product.
@@GrandmasterFU666 I havent seen the claim that it beats a 911 while towing a 911 in the quarter mile. I have seen, including on this video, where it says that it has a faster 1/4 mile time than the 911... at
It didn't even go the full 1/4 mile...you see it crossing the 1/8 mile mark...where the Porsche caught up...but if you look at the footage, the ET clock is next to the 1/4 mile line (which is normal)...but in the "photo-finish"...you don't see it...even when they show the video of the two vehicles racing toward the end...you can clearly tell its the 600 foot mark...because A) its definitely too close to the start; B) its the only clear mark on the drag from the start (the 660 foot mark is the first)...and you don't see the ET clock next to the line....so...did the Tesla truck beat the Porsche in a 1/4 mile drag race, while towing a Porsche...no clue...because we haven't seen that yet...but it clearly can beat it in the 1/8...and given how much ground the Porsche cleared from the start to the 660 foot mark, my money would be on the Porsche in the 1/4 mile
Even more, on some other tests the worse Porsche 2023 911 did a much better time on the 1/8. So, either the Porsche's Pilot was bad, or he was restraining himself. In both case, it's just a fake.
There is also camera trickery involved the cybertuck is actually in front of the porsche at the starting line that's why there is no overhead shot of the start. The camera is set up at a slight angle to make it look like the front of the cars are in line. and the shape of the cars make it more dificult to see the camera angle trickery. but you can clearly see it when the camera starts moving the porsche is a bit faster in taking off, but the way the camera moves it makes it look like the ct is taking off faster at about 00.33 the ct is about the same speed as the porsche. in the cam angle from the front of the porsche the speed of both cars stay the same for a couple of second at about 02.88 the cybertruck starts going faster than the porsche. if it wasn't ahead at the start the porsche would have even won the eight mile. It's actualluy quit the angle if you check on google earth you can see the blue piles in front of the concrete walls. and since they are not evenly space with the gaps in the concrete walls you can see exactly which pilon is which and where the camera was positioned and at what angle it's shooting and than you see how much the image is skewed to get the porsche and the ct fronts to line up it's more tha a couple feet so the ct would definitely not win the eight miles the lead the ct has at the end is less then the lead it had at the start.
@@RadiationNetwork 800hp vs 400.. If you love unfair races that much, you should see a Dodge Demon vs a Cybertruck in a 1/4 mile drag race. Drink your copium.
So Tesla or Elon, care to explained why EngineeringExplained and MotorTrend got different results ??? Also where's the full video of the race and the slip ?? so we can compare the result to MotorTrend
There is also camera trickery involved the cybertuck is actually in front of the porsche at the starting line that's why there is no overhead shot of the start. The camera is set up at a slight angle to make it look like the front of the cars are in line. and the shape of the cars make it more dificult to see the camera angle trickery. but you can clearly see it when the camera starts moving the porsche is a bit faster in taking off, but the way the camera moves it makes it look like the ct is taking off faster at about 00.33 the ct is about the same speed as the porsche. in the cam angle from the front of the porsche the speed of both cars stay the same for a couple of second at about 02.88 the cybertruck starts going faster than the porsche. if it wasn't ahead at the start the porsche would have even won the eight mile. It's actualluy quit the angle if you check on google earth you can see the blue piles in front of the concrete walls. and since they are not evenly space with the gaps in the concrete walls you can see exactly which pilon is which and where the camera was positioned and at what angle it's shooting and than you see how much the image is skewed to get the porsche and the ct fronts to line up it's more tha a couple feet so the ct would definitely not win the eight miles the lead the ct has at the end is less then the lead it had at the start.
@@ChR0nos_7734 So we are just going to neglect the fact that a TRUCK beats a sportscar while pulling a trailer with the same sportscar on the trailer? Is it the fastest porsche? No Can the Cybertruck be bested? Sure Is this feat impressive? Yes - don’t care if it is Tesla, Rivian or Ford. This is impressive.
Yes how fucking pathetic, a 3,5 ton truck towing a 911 not even able to beat the fastest 911. You must suffer from brain damage if you think you somehow put a stain on Teslas name with that comment.
That's not a ¼ Mile Run, thats Sacramento Raceway which is a ⅛ run, the 911 catching up at the end catching up would of absolutely demolished it in an ACTUAL ¼ run 🤣🤣💀
At the end. How far of a gap are we talking, would it even be a gap? But you would agree that the cybertruck would be right behind the 911 right? Cause i mean, it showed them almost at the 1/4 mile line and they were neck and neck. So, maybe half the porsh more than the bumper of the cybertruck? The.... 11,000lb cyber truck vs the 3500lb porsh? Yeah, that sells me. Also, 911 times are about 11.4 on the 1/4. Cybertruck without towing is less than 11. Get smoked.
@@DAmoreEngineering1. porsches are track cars not drag cars. they are not meant to be fast in straight lines but around corners. 2. because of that this isn’t even a good matchup, put it up against a hellcat 😂😂
it's worse it would not even win the eight mile. the ct is way in front of the porsche at the start more than it's lead at the end. the camera is set up at an angle to make it look like the cars line up. and the footage of the lining up is a different camera angle and is edited in to make it look like they are line up. Elon can't stop lying stoopid bag of shit. for proof check the sacramento raceway on google earth line the camera up with the blue piles and the concrete walls, since you can clearly see which is which as they are not spaced evenly with the gaps in the concrete walls, and you wil see what a skewed angle they shot it at.
You mean it beats a Porsche 911 over 1/8 of a mile while towing about 4500 pounds. The CyberTruck would beat 99.9% of all Porsches ever made if it wasn't pulling a Porsche and trailer and its truck not a sports car. Don't believe me? Go look at the production numbers of all models of Porsche built and out of 3 million made only a tiny tiny small fraction made to date can do 0-60 in under 2.6 seconds or the 1/4 mile in 10.8.
@@RadiationNetwork extremely wrong, multiple people have already done the test in real life (all here on youtube) and the cybertruck loses against all 911 models in the actual 1/4 mile even without the trailer. This was just hype for their shitty product.
@@seanpalmer3982 No Dork. That video was not the same 911. It was a $230,000 Turbo S type 992. Stop cherry picking to deal with your copium. The Cybertruck will beat 99.9% of all the 3,000,000 Porsches ever built on the road as there are only a few thousand limited edition models like the 911 Turbo S Type 992 that are faster than the Cybertruck 0-60 and 1/4 mile. The other 2,997,000 are slower than the Cybertruck. Go look at Porsches spec sheets and total build numbers.
😂😂😂 Only to tesla fan boys. The rest of of know that Porsche 911 Turbos are quicker than 11 seconds. And 10.9 seconds. The Porsche driver was sandbagging. It's a video about Tesla BY Tesla. Elon has zero integrity so no one outside of you fan boys can trust that the results weren't predetermined. $50k says a third party wouldn't get the same results.
There is also camera trickery involved the cybertuck is actually in front of the porsche at the starting line that's why there is no overhead shot of the start. The camera is set up at a slight angle to make it look like the front of the cars are in line. and the shape of the cars make it more dificult to see the camera angle trickery. but you can clearly see it when the camera starts moving the porsche is a bit faster in taking off, but the way the camera moves it makes it look like the ct is taking off faster at about 00.33 the ct is about the same speed as the porsche. in the cam angle from the front of the porsche the speed of both cars stay the same for a couple of second at about 02.88 the cybertruck starts going faster than the porsche. if it wasn't ahead at the start the porsche would have even won the eight mile. It's actualluy quit the angle if you check on google earth you can see the blue piles in front of the concrete walls. and since they are not evenly space with the gaps in the concrete walls you can see exactly which pilon is which and where the camera was positioned and at what angle it's shooting and than you see how much the image is skewed to get the porsche and the ct fronts to line up it's more tha a couple feet so the ct would definitely not win the eight miles the lead the ct has at the end is less then the lead it had at the start.
@@jaxt2578 we dont necessarily know. CT has 4 Wheel Steering with full lock at less than half a turn - Hagerty just dropped a video taking it around a gokart track like it was nothin.
I’d love to try one of these out during an Upper Peninsula Michigan Winter. Not sold this vehicle will handle the extreme cold, snow and be economical and efficient. It cost $30-$50 a month in electricity to run my diesel block heater on a timer daily for 4hrs with several days where it had to remain plugged in for the entire day on my PowerStroke F-250. Could move the earth with it and get 11mpg. 15-18mpg daily driving. I’m intrigued by this cyber truck and would love to see and hear more. Thanks. Shane
Cybertruck cyberbeast has 845 horsepower, the 911 which seems to be a standard 992 carrera has 385 horsepower, but still they did not even beat it in the actual quarter mile, while towing a 911, they beat it at the 1/8 mile. If you compare the Carrera’s actual quarter mile of 11.5 seconds to the cyberbeast’s quarter mile of 11 seconds without towing a 911, you can see that there is no way it’s beating the 911 on the quarter mile while towing a 911! The cybertruck is slow. It has the same 0-60 as the 911 992 turbo S, and has a way way way lower top speed than the turbo S has, even though the 911 Turbo S has 650 hp not 845 as the cybertruck has. Specs: Tesla Cybertruck Cyberbeast: Horsepower: 845 Top speed: 130mph/209kph 0-60mph: 2,6 seconds Weight: 6603 pounds/2995 kilos Quarter mile: 11 seconds Porsche 911 992 Carrera Horsepower: 385 Top speed: 182mph/293kph 0-60mph: 4,2 seconds Weight: 3317 pounds/1505 kilos Quarter mile: 11,5 seconds Porsche 911 992 Turbo S Horsepower: 650 Top speed: 205mph/330kph 0-60mph: 2,6 seconds Weight: 3615 pounds/1640 kilos Quarter mile: 10.1 seconds So the fact that Tesla say’s that the cybertruck is faster than a 911 on the quarter mile while towing a 911 is completely false.
I'm a huge Tesla and EV advocate, even though I currently drive a v8 sports car ( still drive a tesla too). This video is can't be true at all, unless the races against a 992 Carrera T M7 which is dumb IMO. Stock a Cybertruck runs 11.0 @ 119 according to Hagerty's tests. It was around 11.2 according to carwow's test against the hummer EV pickup. A stock 911 base RWD according to caranddriver does 0-60 in 3.2 seconds and the 1/4 mile in 11.5 sec @ 120 mph. While the 911 Carrera rwd is cheapest and technically should be the slowest, it is not. That would go to the Carrera T M7. According to caranddriver, they could only achieve 0-60 in 4.0 seconds and 1/4 mile in 12.2 @ 116mph. Now times would be dependent on the driver since it all comes down the shifts. Okay so lets assume a stock Cybetruck does 10.9 because tesla claimed under 11s and the Carrera T does 12.5 because the driver isn't the best shifter. This is all best case scenario for the Cybertruck by the way. The cybertruck is towing another a trailer (lets guess 1000lbs even though it likely is more) and another Porsche which weighs roughly 3300lbs according to caranddriver weights from various base/s/t 992 911 porsches. In other words the the cyber truck is pulling another 4300lbs at least is my guess which definitely adds more than 1 second the 1/4mile. I know that because in carwow's video, they tried to make the race more fair for the Hummer EV pickup by adding 4 additional passengers to the Cybertruck. They were all full grown adults who claimed to weigh about 85kg or lets round to 190lbs. 4 x 190 = 760lbs extra weight which resulted in a 1/4 mile time of 11.5. In this video we are guessing the Cybertruck is pulling an additional 4300lbs. 4300/760 = 5.657. In other words the cybertruck would require an additional 5.657 x .3 (according to the difference in carwow 1/4 mile times with 1 vs 5 passenger in the truck) = 1.69 or lets round down to 1.6 second. So 10.9+ 1.6 = 12.5 seconds. This is literally the best case scenario in every possible way for the Cybertruck just to be equal with the slowest 911 with a meh driver shifting the car. I call BS as someone who drives a Tesla and a V8 muscle car.
Wdym it’s just not real? It is. The evidence is right there. If your that upset that you are going to do 2 hours of math then just don’t worry about it.
Wait a minute....something's up here. They only show them cross the 1/8 mile where it appears the Porsche is gaining. The aerial view cuts off well before the end of the 1/4 where they look to be even. Something's going on.
could have been racing against better car as well and would still have won. its a drag race. and its an electric truck. you cant compete with that, its misleading and the porsche 911 is still almost 2x faster at top speed
wdym? Increasing power without addressing other aspects, such as aerodynamics, weight, and efficiency, may lead to diminishing returns and potential safety issues. That is why it's just steadily increasing and not drastically. Optimization requires a holistic approach, not just blindly adding power, even in EVs. @@idknils2920
Now we’re talking.. maintenance per mile, battery life after 1000 charges unchanged? Battery life expectancy? I get it, it’s badass because it’s bulletproof and fast and powerful… but reliability and cost effective and ease of use? Not yet I don’t think
Not saying that Tesla can’t do this, but how do we know that this is not staged? It’s a professionally produced and edited video with no spectators in sight.
And they only show the 1/8 mile. Supposedly the trailer wasn't rated for over 80, so they decided not to do a full 1/4 mile drag race, but they swear it would still have beat the 911.
I'm a huge Tesla and EV advocate, even though I currently drive a v8 sports car ( still drive a tesla too). This video is can't be true at all, unless the races against a 992 Carrera T M7 which is dumb IMO. Stock a Cybertruck runs 11.0 @ 119 according to Hagerty's tests. It was around 11.2 according to carwow's test against the hummer EV pickup. A stock 911 base RWD according to caranddriver does 0-60 in 3.2 seconds and the 1/4 mile in 11.5 sec @ 120 mph. While the 911 Carrera rwd is cheapest and technically should be the slowest, it is not. That would go to the Carrera T M7. According to caranddriver, they could only achieve 0-60 in 4.0 seconds and 1/4 mile in 12.2 @ 116mph. Now times would be dependent on the driver since it all comes down the shifts. Okay so lets assume a stock Cybetruck does 10.9 because tesla claimed under 11s and the Carrera T does 12.5 because the driver isn't the best shifter. This is all best case scenario for the Cybertruck by the way. The cybertruck is towing another a trailer (lets guess 1000lbs even though it likely is more) and another Porsche which weighs roughly 3300lbs according to caranddriver weights from various base/s/t 992 911 porsches. In other words the the cyber truck is pulling another 4300lbs at least is my guess which definitely adds more than 1 second the 1/4mile. I know that because in carwow's video, they tried to make the race more fair for the Hummer EV pickup by adding 4 additional passengers to the Cybertruck. They were all full grown adults who claimed to weigh about 85kg or lets round to 190lbs. 4 x 190 = 760lbs extra weight which resulted in a 1/4 mile time of 11.5. In this video we are guessing the Cybertruck is pulling an additional 4300lbs. 4300/760 = 5.657. In other words the cybertruck would require an additional 5.657 x .3 (according to the difference in carwow 1/4 mile times with 1 vs 5 passenger in the truck) = 1.69 or lets round down to 1.6 second. So 10.9+ 1.6 = 12.5 seconds. This is literally the best case scenario in every possible way for the Cybertruck just to be equal with the slowest 911 with a meh driver shifting the car. I call BS as someone who drives a Tesla and a V8 muscle car.
There is also camera trickery involved the cybertuck is actually in front of the porsche at the starting line that's why there is no overhead shot of the start. The camera is set up at a slight angle to make it look like the front of the cars are in line. and the shape of the cars make it more dificult to see the camera angle trickery. but you can clearly see it when the camera starts moving the porsche is a bit faster in taking off, but the way the camera moves it makes it look like the ct is taking off faster at about 00.33 the ct is about the same speed as the porsche. in the cam angle from the front of the porsche the speed of both cars stay the same for a couple of second at about 02.88 the cybertruck starts going faster than the porsche. if it wasn't ahead at the start the porsche would have even won the eight mile. It's actualluy quit the angle if you check on google earth you can see the blue piles in front of the concrete walls. and since they are not evenly space with the gaps in the concrete walls you can see exactly which pilon is which and where the camera was positioned and at what angle it's shooting and than you see how much the image is skewed to get the porsche and the ct fronts to line up it's more tha a couple feet so the ct would definitely not win the eight miles the lead the ct has at the end is less then the lead it had at the start.
I am going to wait for a channel like Carwow to make a video like this and then I will see if it is actually true. I have a hard time believing that a 911 turbo s lost against a fully loaded cyber truck. Edit: I just watched the Hagerty drag race and on a prepped surface the cyber truck with 845 HP goes a 11 sec flat for the quarter mile without a trailer and a car. The Porsche 911 turbo s 992 does a quarter mile in 9.9 sec on a prepped surface. It also does a 0 to 60 in 2.2 sec. This is what you call a false advertisement.
Oh yeah, this is absolutely manipulative. The "less than 11 seconds" and taglines "faster than a 911".... What? Around a track? Top speed? Quarter mile? Oh wait, the 911 is faster in every single one of those.
Looked t the specs and Porsche 9-11 turbo has 0-60 of 2.6 seconds which is same as highest trim tri motor cyber truck. But highest trim cybertruck cost 100,000 while Porsche cost 230,000. So cyber truck is not only faster, but has better value and utility.
suprised there a few things I can see are issues already. The hub caps will definately get smashed off on curbs. The concave button for the box cover will have water and dirt puddle and deteriorate the switch. The door handles and charging port cab on the wheel well will definately have dirt and mud build up with use on backroads and muddy conditions and will restrict the covers and latches from opening without pinching on the panels. On second look, the interior has lots of concave panels that are going to hold and trap dirt. I'm sure lots of these will get sorted in the near future.
But Porsche is one beautiful looking car. Cybertruck on the other hand is a literal deformity. Even kindergarten students can come up with a better design
@@senpai1628 Hell no, all Porsche look the same and all of them look ugly. Had you put a McLaren, Ferrari or Lamborghini then yes they look much better but Porsche are all ugly with the same shape and design 🤢🤢
@@SRNAR8 because if it's not broken, it won't be fixed. At least Porsche's design is streamline and is updated with each generation, and not looking like a sharp angled mess. It's worked for over 60 years for enthusiasts with a timeless design.
@@SRNAR8 I'll take any Porsche over this cybertruck. Musk needs to fire the entire Tesla designing team. Most of their cars have excellent performance and features but look hella ugly
@@BasementTracksyou do have many ev and hybrid alternatives to Tesla, including Chevy bolt. If you're going to bring up promises, two years ago it was "financially insane" to buy any other car because Tesla was about to reach full automomy and have a million robotaxis driving around the US. Today GM is still selling 6 times more cars that Tesla (not ev, sure, a decade later people still prefer traditional cars), Mercedes is selling cars with more autonomy than Tesla, Toyota and Hyunday are much more reliable cars than Tesla (lookup any customer survey in car magazine), and we have 0 robotaxis and 0 full automomy Tesla or even 90% autonomous miles, that Elon promised "in the next few months" in 2015 lol
@@fdjizm The truth hurts. The only fake laugh you get is in your imagination or virtually on the Internet pretending you have a nice car instead of your cringe mobile.
@kuvnatalejandro9466 it hurts more that farmer Joe brown is now outrunning your precious porsche on the way to whole foods. The mighty porsche has been PORCHed.👨🌾🛻🤠💨
That's electric vs petrol. How many times can the Cyber truck do this without a recharge? How many times can the Porsche do it on one tank of fuel? Which one isn't ugly?
while this is really impressive, i gotta say they probably cheated a bit to get this done. if you watch closely, you can see the 911 starts without its launch controle (listen to the sound of the engine, it starts revving from down below also, pay attention to the body movement of the car.) so this would probably beat the cybertruck with its launch controle active. still, this is a very impressive achievement considering it having to tow all that weight. edit for reference: here is a base 911 launching WITHOUT launch controle and im pretty sure this is the same rev pattern i can see and hear in the tesla video. czcams.com/users/shortsJb4LaULlXFM
It kinda seemed as the Porsche was going to pass the truck it let off as the nose dove quite a bit. I’d be impressed even if the truck lost an honest race but I’m kinda getting skeptical of Tesla as it seems the demo comparisons are always rigged.
Also it seems like a Manual Gearbox Porsche, meaning there are short dips in poweroutput which you can clearly see as when they shift the porsche starts to fall back a tiny bit. Automatics are better for dragraces #savethemanuals
There is also camera trickery involved the cybertuck is actually in front of the porsche at the starting line that's why there is no overhead shot of the start. The camera is set up at a slight angle to make it look like the front of the cars are in line. and the shape of the cars make it more dificult to see the camera angle trickery. but you can clearly see it when the camera starts moving the porsche is a bit faster in taking off, but the way the camera moves it makes it look like the ct is taking off faster at about 00.33 the ct is about the same speed as the porsche. in the cam angle from the front of the porsche the speed of both cars stay the same for a couple of second at about 02.88 the cybertruck starts going faster than the porsche. if it wasn't ahead at the start the porsche would have even won the eight mile. It's actualluy quit the angle if you check on google earth you can see the blue piles in front of the concrete walls. and since they are not evenly space with the gaps in the concrete walls you can see exactly which pilon is which and where the camera was positioned and at what angle it's shooting and than you see how much the image is skewed to get the porsche and the ct fronts to line up it's more tha a couple feet so the ct would definitely not win the eight miles the lead the ct has at the end is less then the lead it had at the start.
@@jazzabighits4473 I mean, you can always hope? xD Truck beating a sports car while towing that same sports car, a Porsche 911... what do you mean ??? This is ridiculous man.
@@gregggoElon has mastered the marketing of useless drag races 😂. The Porsche is designed for a race track which involves beating on the engines, brakes, and suspension all while taking corners at a high speed in a controlled manner. They could care less about a 0-60 or 1/4 mile which is all the Tesla seems to be good at
I’d like to do this outside Scomo's house, the ex- prime minister of Australia. He famously said about EVs "they wont tow your boat, & will ruin your weekends" Lmfao!
@@callumdonington2227 He was disparaging EVs because he thought they couldn't tow anything. He is an idiot, and likely being paid off by Toyota and the fossil fuel lobby in general.
There is also camera trickery involved the cybertuck is actually in front of the porsche at the starting line that's why there is no overhead shot of the start. The camera is set up at a slight angle to make it look like the front of the cars are in line. and the shape of the cars make it more dificult to see the camera angle trickery. but you can clearly see it when the camera starts moving the porsche is a bit faster in taking off, but the way the camera moves it makes it look like the ct is taking off faster at about 00.33 the ct is about the same speed as the porsche. in the cam angle from the front of the porsche the speed of both cars stay the same for a couple of second at about 02.88 the cybertruck starts going faster than the porsche. if it wasn't ahead at the start the porsche would have even won the eight mile. It's actualluy quit the angle if you check on google earth you can see the blue piles in front of the concrete walls. and since they are not evenly space with the gaps in the concrete walls you can see exactly which pilon is which and where the camera was positioned and at what angle it's shooting and than you see how much the image is skewed to get the porsche and the ct fronts to line up it's more tha a couple feet so the ct would definitely not win the eight miles the lead the ct has at the end is less then the lead it had at the start.
Correct me if I’m wrong. I believe the 911 they used is a Carrera T which only comes in a manual transmission. An electric vehicle vs a manual transmission in a short race…. The manual loses everytime. Impressive nonetheless!
dont forget the fact that this is really just about how fast you start off. and the cybertruck has an electric motor.. so.. you know.. its obviously gonna have an advantage. this is misleading. acceleration is higher but it says nothing about top speed etc. so you are gonna be faster in a short track, or if you go through a lot of curves. but the top speed of a 911 is 330~ kmh. the cybertruck is about 180 kmh if the data is still correct
@@onezweithree are you just playing dumb? you must be, right? its literally marketing. make it look better, those who dont know as much about cars will think "WOOOOW it smoked a 911" and do not mention the fact its actually 2x faster at top speed cuz that would be bad. and nobody can say you did that on purpose, cause you didnt say anything against it.
They have electric turbos! My friends company works on them and their only client for them is Porsche. I still don't know how it works being electric but hey they exist! @@shazam6274
U do know this is a Porsche Carrera T which is a 7 speed manual Transmission making it the slowest of all 911s,also they cut it off at the 1/8th mile the porsche wouldve won the 1/4 mile
The 911 turbo 0-60 in 2.6 secs recorded 2.2, the turbo s is 2.1 secs, was recorded 1.8 secs. The cyberbeast high trim level makes 2.6 from 0-60, other cyber models are above 4 secs.
I'm a huge Tesla and EV advocate, even though I currently drive a v8 sports car ( still drive a tesla too). This video is can't be true at all, unless the races against a 992 Carrera T M7 which is dumb IMO. Stock a Cybertruck runs 11.0 @ 119 according to Hagerty's tests. It was around 11.2 according to carwow's test against the hummer EV pickup. A stock 911 base RWD according to caranddriver does 0-60 in 3.2 seconds and the 1/4 mile in 11.5 sec @ 120 mph. While the 911 Carrera rwd is cheapest and technically should be the slowest, it is not. That would go to the Carrera T M7. According to caranddriver, they could only achieve 0-60 in 4.0 seconds and 1/4 mile in 12.2 @ 116mph. Now times would be dependent on the driver since it all comes down the shifts. Okay so lets assume a stock Cybetruck does 10.9 because tesla claimed under 11s and the Carrera T does 12.5 because the driver isn't the best shifter. This is all best case scenario for the Cybertruck by the way. The cybertruck is towing another a trailer (lets guess 1000lbs even though it likely is more) and another Porsche which weighs roughly 3300lbs according to caranddriver weights from various base/s/t 992 911 porsches. In other words the the cyber truck is pulling another 4300lbs at least is my guess which definitely adds more than 1 second the 1/4mile. I know that because in carwow's video, they tried to make the race more fair for the Hummer EV pickup by adding 4 additional passengers to the Cybertruck. They were all full grown adults who claimed to weigh about 85kg or lets round to 190lbs. 4 x 190 = 760lbs extra weight which resulted in a 1/4 mile time of 11.5. In this video we are guessing the Cybertruck is pulling an additional 4300lbs. 4300/760 = 5.657. In other words the cybertruck would require an additional 5.657 x .3 (according to the difference in carwow 1/4 mile times with 1 vs 5 passenger in the truck) = 1.69 or lets round down to 1.6 second. So 10.9+ 1.6 = 12.5 seconds. This is literally the best case scenario in every possible way for the Cybertruck just to be equal with the slowest 911 with a meh driver shifting the car. I call BS as someone who drives a Tesla and a V8 muscle car.
It's faster cause it doesn't need to render as many polygons
After all, we are living in a simulation...
😂
Quit gaming for a while for your mental health.
@@fatihkan2601If not gaming means being as much fun as you then I’ll go back to my games. :)
😂
This is now confirmed to be a 1/8 mile distance and not the 1/4 mile.
Yea and I don’t think the 911 was using launch control… and don’t know which model.
@@omara3389 who cares. awesome result in the video
@@Notme-tq4xs fake result… also manual and no clue if he’s short shifting or not bc they covered it w music
EXACTLY. for 1/4 it wouldn't even beat the cheaper model Cayman S.
you are right, how cares with. but lying and cheating about it? @@Notme-tq4xs
A bit misleading as it has the lead at the 1/8, but the Porsche is gaining fast and will beat it in the 1/4 which is why the video does not show the entire race.
Don't forget everyone, including Elon, stated it's in the 1/4 mile.
The Cybertruck performance is impressive. However, can't stand the misleading advertisement and, for that reason, will never buy a Tesla product.
@@GrandmasterFU666 Elon Musk thinks false advertising falls under 'free speech'.
@@GrandmasterFU666 The lightly trained eye will be able to see that this is 1/8th not 1/4th
@@MoserBagel unfortunately the Tesla fan base would argue until they turn blue
@@GrandmasterFU666 I havent seen the claim that it beats a 911 while towing a 911 in the quarter mile. I have seen, including on this video, where it says that it has a faster 1/4 mile time than the 911... at
It didn't even go the full 1/4 mile...you see it crossing the 1/8 mile mark...where the Porsche caught up...but if you look at the footage, the ET clock is next to the 1/4 mile line (which is normal)...but in the "photo-finish"...you don't see it...even when they show the video of the two vehicles racing toward the end...you can clearly tell its the 600 foot mark...because A) its definitely too close to the start; B) its the only clear mark on the drag from the start (the 660 foot mark is the first)...and you don't see the ET clock next to the line....so...did the Tesla truck beat the Porsche in a 1/4 mile drag race, while towing a Porsche...no clue...because we haven't seen that yet...but it clearly can beat it in the 1/8...and given how much ground the Porsche cleared from the start to the 660 foot mark, my money would be on the Porsche in the 1/4 mile
This guys explains the math : czcams.com/video/HRYS5VWXZts/video.html
THANK YOU! i hate when companies like this blatantly lie about ts
This is why Elon loves Trump. They just make crap up and pretend its Fact. False advertising!
Its sad that they have to lie to promote a product...
Even more, on some other tests the worse Porsche 2023 911 did a much better time on the 1/8. So, either the Porsche's Pilot was bad, or he was restraining himself.
In both case, it's just a fake.
Run it again with the Porsche towing a Cyber Truck
Lmao
haha then porsche will do for 14 sec 1/4 mile :D
😂
Don't do the Porsche like that
lol the porsche wouldnt even move a bit XD
I can't wait to see people doing pulls while towing a camper trailer that is not rated and seeing the camper rip off the trailer frame 😂
It will happen for sure lol
Lmao... too much American muscle
gonna be so much fun on the road hahahahaha
HAHA PORSCHE LOOOL!!
😂😂😂😂
Wow you tricked people into thinking it can beat a Porsche
There is also camera trickery involved the cybertuck is actually in front of the porsche at the starting line that's why there is no overhead shot of the start. The camera is set up at a slight angle to make it look like the front of the cars are in line. and the shape of the cars make it more dificult to see the camera angle trickery. but you can clearly see it when the camera starts moving the porsche is a bit faster in taking off, but the way the camera moves it makes it look like the ct is taking off faster at about 00.33 the ct is about the same speed as the porsche. in the cam angle from the front of the porsche the speed of both cars stay the same for a couple of second at about 02.88 the cybertruck starts going faster than the porsche. if it wasn't ahead at the start the porsche would have even won the eight mile.
It's actualluy quit the angle if you check on google earth you can see the blue piles in front of the concrete walls. and since they are not evenly space with the gaps in the concrete walls you can see exactly which pilon is which and where the camera was positioned and at what angle it's shooting and than you see how much the image is skewed to get the porsche and the ct fronts to line up it's more tha a couple feet so the ct would definitely not win the eight miles the lead the ct has at the end is less then the lead it had at the start.
technically in the 8th mile yeah
It not only beat the Porsche it did it while towing about 4500 pounds. Drink your copium.
@@RadiationNetwork bc its an electic car dumbass the porsche would wet any tesla in 1/2 mile drag strip
@@RadiationNetwork 800hp vs 400.. If you love unfair races that much, you should see a Dodge Demon vs a Cybertruck in a 1/4 mile drag race. Drink your copium.
So Tesla or Elon, care to explained why EngineeringExplained and MotorTrend got different results ???
Also where's the full video of the race and the slip ?? so we can compare the result to MotorTrend
At first I thought it was just insane the car on its own going faster than 911, but then seeing it loaded. INSANE.
yeah the audienc3e reaction was INSANE
Well you ruined it for me now
Epic
@@danieldc8841maybe you should view prior to reading reactions
@@danieldc8841 its a 49 second video whyd you go to the comments before watching LOL
Now we need an F-150 Raptor vs Cybertruck towing an F-150 Raptor
Why?
@@DatingForRealCZcamsChannel💀
hell yeah😂
@@DatingForRealCZcamsChannelbecause both fast trucks
@@winjaywin - Oh, okay. :-)
uh, that was an 1/8th mile???
It only went 1/8 of a mile.
It's actually slower over a quarter mile, if you calculate it up.
There is also camera trickery involved the cybertuck is actually in front of the porsche at the starting line that's why there is no overhead shot of the start. The camera is set up at a slight angle to make it look like the front of the cars are in line. and the shape of the cars make it more dificult to see the camera angle trickery. but you can clearly see it when the camera starts moving the porsche is a bit faster in taking off, but the way the camera moves it makes it look like the ct is taking off faster at about 00.33 the ct is about the same speed as the porsche. in the cam angle from the front of the porsche the speed of both cars stay the same for a couple of second at about 02.88 the cybertruck starts going faster than the porsche. if it wasn't ahead at the start the porsche would have even won the eight mile.
It's actualluy quit the angle if you check on google earth you can see the blue piles in front of the concrete walls. and since they are not evenly space with the gaps in the concrete walls you can see exactly which pilon is which and where the camera was positioned and at what angle it's shooting and than you see how much the image is skewed to get the porsche and the ct fronts to line up it's more tha a couple feet so the ct would definitely not win the eight miles the lead the ct has at the end is less then the lead it had at the start.
Its even slower on the 1/8 mile. Its hilariously fake
@@user-ee9cz6mc1x bro wrote all of thag just to one care about it
Cybertruck racing a 911, while carrying a 911 and beating it!! That's just insanity at a different level!!
using 911 Carrera. Literally cheapest and least horsepower 911. Try this race against Turbo S and outcome will be way different
мне бы хватило кайфа ехать в прицепе кибертрака находясь в порше😂😂😂 ,ускорение 2,6 сёк,вот это был сюриализм😮
@@ChR0nos_7734
So we are just going to neglect the fact that a TRUCK beats a sportscar while pulling a trailer with the same sportscar on the trailer?
Is it the fastest porsche? No
Can the Cybertruck be bested? Sure
Is this feat impressive? Yes - don’t care if it is Tesla, Rivian or Ford. This is impressive.
@@ChR0nos_7734the problem is, the cheapest 911 is still more expensive than the most expensive cybertruck
@@thomashansen5688electric cars are only fast in their 0-60 speeds,if they had raced over half a mile the base model 911 Porsche would beat it
Do you want to make your Porsche be faster? Hook it behind a Cybertruck... XD
I’d still choose a Porsche over any Tesla any day
quicker* not faster
Wow😂
@@ailtommoto1226 why, do you like being a loser?
Let's check the lap times! Oh wait...
Bro didn't even did a 1/4 Mile and took the slowest 911 T 😂😂
It’s 992
Bro
The Porsche lost because it was a lie. I watch throttle house. 😂😂😂😂😂❤😂😂 they never lie
It’s not the slowest 992. Bro it’s because this video was lying.
Yes how fucking pathetic, a 3,5 ton truck towing a 911 not even able to beat the fastest 911. You must suffer from brain damage if you think you somehow put a stain on Teslas name with that comment.
Now let’s see them on a track…
Now take the cybertruck round a track 😂
hagerty did, go see the video 😂😂
That's not a ¼ Mile Run, thats Sacramento Raceway which is a ⅛ run, the 911 catching up at the end catching up would of absolutely demolished it in an ACTUAL ¼ run 🤣🤣💀
At the end. How far of a gap are we talking, would it even be a gap? But you would agree that the cybertruck would be right behind the 911 right? Cause i mean, it showed them almost at the 1/4 mile line and they were neck and neck. So, maybe half the porsh more than the bumper of the cybertruck?
The.... 11,000lb cyber truck vs the 3500lb porsh? Yeah, that sells me. Also, 911 times are about 11.4 on the 1/4. Cybertruck without towing is less than 11. Get smoked.
Unless the Cybertruck got rid of the trailer.. then it would absolutely KILL the 911 down the 1/4. So what is to laugh about?
@@DAmoreEngineering1. porsches are track cars not drag cars. they are not meant to be fast in straight lines but around corners. 2. because of that this isn’t even a good matchup, put it up against a hellcat 😂😂
@@zoic613 No stock Hellcat, red eye, brown eye, demon, 170, whatever, has ever beat a Tesla Model S Plaid down a 1/4 mile. Even on prepped surface.
it's worse it would not even win the eight mile. the ct is way in front of the porsche at the start more than it's lead at the end. the camera is set up at an angle to make it look like the cars line up. and the footage of the lining up is a different camera angle and is edited in to make it look like they are line up. Elon can't stop lying stoopid bag of shit.
for proof check the sacramento raceway on google earth line the camera up with the blue piles and the concrete walls, since you can clearly see which is which as they are not spaced evenly with the gaps in the concrete walls, and you wil see what a skewed angle they shot it at.
Beats a Porsche 911 over 1/8 of a mile. Not the standard 1/4 mile. Let's wait for Carwow to show it.
You mean it beats a Porsche 911 over 1/8 of a mile while towing about 4500 pounds. The CyberTruck would beat 99.9% of all Porsches ever made if it wasn't pulling a Porsche and trailer and its truck not a sports car. Don't believe me? Go look at the production numbers of all models of Porsche built and out of 3 million made only a tiny tiny small fraction made to date can do 0-60 in under 2.6 seconds or the 1/4 mile in 10.8.
@@RadiationNetwork youre cyber shitbox will be destroyed in an acctual non biased drag race lol
@@RadiationNetwork youre cybertruck does the quarter mile in 11 seconds while the porsche 911 only needs 9.9 seconds
@@RadiationNetwork extremely wrong, multiple people have already done the test in real life (all here on youtube) and the cybertruck loses against all 911 models in the actual 1/4 mile even without the trailer. This was just hype for their shitty product.
@@seanpalmer3982 No Dork. That video was not the same 911. It was a $230,000 Turbo S type 992. Stop cherry picking to deal with your copium. The Cybertruck will beat 99.9% of all the 3,000,000 Porsches ever built on the road as there are only a few thousand limited edition models like the 911 Turbo S Type 992 that are faster than the Cybertruck 0-60 and 1/4 mile. The other 2,997,000 are slower than the Cybertruck. Go look at Porsches spec sheets and total build numbers.
Me when I lie on the internet
You never know when you need that passing power while towing!
The fact that you can. Is more than enough
That was an 1/8th mile drag race, the porsche would smoke it in the real 1/4😂😂😂
@@user-lu3nn5ly3f Absolute 🤡🤡🤡🤡
Go back to your Bicycle you know less than nothing about cars
then the average tesla driver swerves back into your lane before the trailer is passed
The answer is "always, you always need it!" 😂
That 49 second video did more for Cybertruck than any mainstream advert could have achieved.
sure distracted from the fact its 30% more expensive, 30% less range
@@blob2092 - while being over twice its size, hauling the thing it is racing...
@@youngfischerwhile looking a lot worse, sounding a lot worse, handling a lot worse, and being much less fun to drive
@phara0h623 a Porsche and a Cybertuck aren't even in the same class of car?
😂😂😂 Only to tesla fan boys. The rest of of know that Porsche 911 Turbos are quicker than 11 seconds. And 10.9 seconds. The Porsche driver was sandbagging. It's a video about Tesla BY Tesla. Elon has zero integrity so no one outside of you fan boys can trust that the results weren't predetermined. $50k says a third party wouldn't get the same results.
They choose the low-end 911 just so the Cybertruck could stand a chance😂😂😂😂
you so einstein.
wrg,idts, no such thing as lowx, highx etc, idtic fools.
and they cheated by claiming 1/4 mile when it was only 1/8 mile
There is also camera trickery involved the cybertuck is actually in front of the porsche at the starting line that's why there is no overhead shot of the start. The camera is set up at a slight angle to make it look like the front of the cars are in line. and the shape of the cars make it more dificult to see the camera angle trickery. but you can clearly see it when the camera starts moving the porsche is a bit faster in taking off, but the way the camera moves it makes it look like the ct is taking off faster at about 00.33 the ct is about the same speed as the porsche. in the cam angle from the front of the porsche the speed of both cars stay the same for a couple of second at about 02.88 the cybertruck starts going faster than the porsche. if it wasn't ahead at the start the porsche would have even won the eight mile.
It's actualluy quit the angle if you check on google earth you can see the blue piles in front of the concrete walls. and since they are not evenly space with the gaps in the concrete walls you can see exactly which pilon is which and where the camera was positioned and at what angle it's shooting and than you see how much the image is skewed to get the porsche and the ct fronts to line up it's more tha a couple feet so the ct would definitely not win the eight miles the lead the ct has at the end is less then the lead it had at the start.
@@Notme-tq4xs Really Einstein ?
"Hey dude, remember to stay back and let me win, ok?"
Are you going to upload the 1/4 mile footage too?
The horsepower on this vehicle is absolutely insane!
TESLA is Sandbagging, the Tri motor Drivetrain is 1500 hp PEAK.
Horsepower doesn't pull a Trailer. Torque does
the cybermuck is so ugly
@@ncredibledark7926 But horsepower wins the race.
@@jkselama4698 i forgot that the main reason to buy a pickup truck was to race people...
The fact that a cyber tuck almost got bet by a flat 6 is hilarious and like hell that’s a 1/4mile
You forgot that the Cybertruck was TOWING another Porsche and a flatbed. How fast will the Porsche go while towing another Porsche?
It’s also the slowest Porsche 911 and it’s a manual. Tesla intentionally chose the SLOWEST and least capable 911 to try to market their giant POS
Bruh... Everybody who knows how a dragstrip looks like, or has a general understanding of imperial range probably notices the error here.
I always struggled drawing cars,…. Thanks Elon for launching this box (no offence), now it’s very easy for me to draw a car. 😂
Old Volvos are also good.
(Not too old, though. The really old ones are curvy like overgrown VW Beetles.)
This joke was overdone in just 24h or I'm watching too much Cybertruck videos or both.
Funny how this box you are trying to put down looks more futuristic than any other car on the road, nice try bro
Trying to easy likes yeah
I always struggled with making jokes... Thanks Elon for launching this box (no offense), now it's very easy for me to copy and paste comment. 😂
I would love to see a cornering comparison
Sports car vs 4x4
We all know what would win... but who knows? The lower CoM (centre of mass) might improve its cornering performance
@@jaxt2578 we dont necessarily know. CT has 4 Wheel Steering with full lock at less than half a turn - Hagerty just dropped a video taking it around a gokart track like it was nothin.
@@Prodegenius oh that's right! Forgot about the 4 wheel steering!
I'd love to see the Porsche climb a ladder.
@jaxt2578 even the plaid is a joke with cornering
I’d love to try one of these out during an Upper Peninsula Michigan Winter. Not sold this vehicle will handle the extreme cold, snow and be economical and efficient. It cost $30-$50 a month in electricity to run my diesel block heater on a timer daily for 4hrs with several days where it had to remain plugged in for the entire day on my PowerStroke F-250. Could move the earth with it and get 11mpg. 15-18mpg daily driving. I’m intrigued by this cyber truck and would love to see and hear more. Thanks. Shane
What is economical and efficient in the artic there ?
Cybertruck cyberbeast has 845 horsepower, the 911 which seems to be a standard 992 carrera has 385 horsepower, but still they did not even beat it in the actual quarter mile, while towing a 911, they beat it at the 1/8 mile. If you compare the Carrera’s actual quarter mile of 11.5 seconds to the cyberbeast’s quarter mile of 11 seconds without towing a 911, you can see that there is no way it’s beating the 911 on the quarter mile while towing a 911! The cybertruck is slow. It has the same 0-60 as the 911 992 turbo S, and has a way way way lower top speed than the turbo S has, even though the 911 Turbo S has 650 hp not 845 as the cybertruck has.
Specs:
Tesla Cybertruck Cyberbeast:
Horsepower: 845
Top speed: 130mph/209kph
0-60mph: 2,6 seconds
Weight: 6603 pounds/2995 kilos
Quarter mile: 11 seconds
Porsche 911 992 Carrera
Horsepower: 385
Top speed: 182mph/293kph
0-60mph: 4,2 seconds
Weight: 3317 pounds/1505 kilos
Quarter mile: 11,5 seconds
Porsche 911 992 Turbo S
Horsepower: 650
Top speed: 205mph/330kph
0-60mph: 2,6 seconds
Weight: 3615 pounds/1640 kilos
Quarter mile: 10.1 seconds
So the fact that Tesla say’s that the cybertruck is faster than a 911 on the quarter mile while towing a 911 is completely false.
LOVE how it didn't show the load tell AFTER winning. 💪🏼😍👍🏻
?
Not a CT fan but that was a great reveal! Well done.
till*
I'm a huge Tesla and EV advocate, even though I currently drive a v8 sports car ( still drive a tesla too). This video is can't be true at all, unless the races against a 992 Carrera T M7 which is dumb IMO.
Stock a Cybertruck runs 11.0 @ 119 according to Hagerty's tests. It was around 11.2 according to carwow's test against the hummer EV pickup. A stock 911 base RWD according to caranddriver does 0-60 in 3.2 seconds and the 1/4 mile in 11.5 sec @ 120 mph. While the 911 Carrera rwd is cheapest and technically should be the slowest, it is not. That would go to the Carrera T M7. According to caranddriver, they could only achieve 0-60 in 4.0 seconds and 1/4 mile in 12.2 @ 116mph. Now times would be dependent on the driver since it all comes down the shifts.
Okay so lets assume a stock Cybetruck does 10.9 because tesla claimed under 11s and the Carrera T does 12.5 because the driver isn't the best shifter. This is all best case scenario for the Cybertruck by the way. The cybertruck is towing another a trailer (lets guess 1000lbs even though it likely is more) and another Porsche which weighs roughly 3300lbs according to caranddriver weights from various base/s/t 992 911 porsches. In other words the the cyber truck is pulling another 4300lbs at least is my guess which definitely adds more than 1 second the 1/4mile.
I know that because in carwow's video, they tried to make the race more fair for the Hummer EV pickup by adding 4 additional passengers to the Cybertruck. They were all full grown adults who claimed to weigh about 85kg or lets round to 190lbs. 4 x 190 = 760lbs extra weight which resulted in a 1/4 mile time of 11.5.
In this video we are guessing the Cybertruck is pulling an additional 4300lbs. 4300/760 = 5.657. In other words the cybertruck would require an additional 5.657 x .3 (according to the difference in carwow 1/4 mile times with 1 vs 5 passenger in the truck) = 1.69 or lets round down to 1.6 second. So 10.9+ 1.6 = 12.5 seconds.
This is literally the best case scenario in every possible way for the Cybertruck just to be equal with the slowest 911 with a meh driver shifting the car. I call BS as someone who drives a Tesla and a V8 muscle car.
Wdym it’s just not real? It is. The evidence is right there. If your that upset that you are going to do 2 hours of math then just don’t worry about it.
Vehicles so phantasmagorical they can post 1/4 mile times in just AN EIGHTH OF A MILE!! Truly miraculous 😆
And now we know you faked it...
Wait a minute....something's up here. They only show them cross the 1/8 mile where it appears the Porsche is gaining. The aerial view cuts off well before the end of the 1/4 where they look to be even.
Something's going on.
over 800hp electrıc car to 300-400hp pıston head car ? cool story :))
could have been racing against better car as well and would still have won. its a drag race. and its an electric truck. you cant compete with that, its misleading and the porsche 911 is still almost 2x faster at top speed
@@zero.Identity i believe he would've lost if he raced a Taycan turbo S
have you even listened to what i just said?@@Dior444L
@@Dior444L 911 Turbo or Turbo S model would do that. no need a tycan turbo S.
I notice you completely ignore the fact it beat a Porsche while towing a Porsche. #butthurt #whiner
Okay, I thought obviously Cyberbeast will be going faster than 911, but then it was pulling the Porsche as well.
Unexpected.
(Edit: Porche -> Porsche)
put the Truck up to a Turbo and see the expected result...
That's just insanity at a different level!!
@@yangshee7606 you can make anything fast by just blindly adding power to it which is especially easy on an EV
wdym? Increasing power without addressing other aspects, such as aerodynamics, weight, and efficiency, may lead to diminishing returns and potential safety issues. That is why it's just steadily increasing and not drastically. Optimization requires a holistic approach, not just blindly adding power, even in EVs.
@@idknils2920
@@idknils2920Ok, but let the Turbo tow another porsche. Lets see the result.
Went to the 1/8 miles 😂
What an amazing car… the 911. Passion… History… Design… 👍👍🙂 Greetings from Stuttgart
Bro the Porsche is pushing the cybertruck to victory 😂
Stoners Unite
Exactly, they must’ve Photoshopped-out the flames from the 911’s rocket jets. 😀
Bro you shoulda been there bro
No, the cyber truck was towing the Porsche bro watch it again
No no no no no no no no😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡
I would love to know the pre and post battery charge level
Now we’re talking.. maintenance per mile, battery life after 1000 charges unchanged? Battery life expectancy? I get it, it’s badass because it’s bulletproof and fast and powerful… but reliability and cost effective and ease of use? Not yet I don’t think
Not saying that Tesla can’t do this, but how do we know that this is not staged? It’s a professionally produced and edited video with no spectators in sight.
And they only show the 1/8 mile.
Supposedly the trailer wasn't rated for over 80, so they decided not to do a full 1/4 mile drag race, but they swear it would still have beat the 911.
Ouch Elon, it's not faster. Check the chanel engineering explained.
its good to see tesla doing stuff without any other notice
You got your notice 5 years ago
The world's eyes peeled @@notl3var long live tesla.
I'm a huge Tesla and EV advocate, even though I currently drive a v8 sports car ( still drive a tesla too). This video is can't be true at all, unless the races against a 992 Carrera T M7 which is dumb IMO.
Stock a Cybertruck runs 11.0 @ 119 according to Hagerty's tests. It was around 11.2 according to carwow's test against the hummer EV pickup. A stock 911 base RWD according to caranddriver does 0-60 in 3.2 seconds and the 1/4 mile in 11.5 sec @ 120 mph. While the 911 Carrera rwd is cheapest and technically should be the slowest, it is not. That would go to the Carrera T M7. According to caranddriver, they could only achieve 0-60 in 4.0 seconds and 1/4 mile in 12.2 @ 116mph. Now times would be dependent on the driver since it all comes down the shifts.
Okay so lets assume a stock Cybetruck does 10.9 because tesla claimed under 11s and the Carrera T does 12.5 because the driver isn't the best shifter. This is all best case scenario for the Cybertruck by the way. The cybertruck is towing another a trailer (lets guess 1000lbs even though it likely is more) and another Porsche which weighs roughly 3300lbs according to caranddriver weights from various base/s/t 992 911 porsches. In other words the the cyber truck is pulling another 4300lbs at least is my guess which definitely adds more than 1 second the 1/4mile.
I know that because in carwow's video, they tried to make the race more fair for the Hummer EV pickup by adding 4 additional passengers to the Cybertruck. They were all full grown adults who claimed to weigh about 85kg or lets round to 190lbs. 4 x 190 = 760lbs extra weight which resulted in a 1/4 mile time of 11.5.
In this video we are guessing the Cybertruck is pulling an additional 4300lbs. 4300/760 = 5.657. In other words the cybertruck would require an additional 5.657 x .3 (according to the difference in carwow 1/4 mile times with 1 vs 5 passenger in the truck) = 1.69 or lets round down to 1.6 second. So 10.9+ 1.6 = 12.5 seconds.
This is literally the best case scenario in every possible way for the Cybertruck just to be equal with the slowest 911 with a meh driver shifting the car. I call BS as someone who drives a Tesla and a V8 muscle car.
@@user-sx2qe6tv4zhonestly... nobody's going to read what you wrote
@@miken2968i did. seems like u can’t read fast enough
That Porsche will do that drag race start over & over without missing a beat the next 100 times.
#butthurt #whiner
And also be faster than shown in the video, and actually beat it in the quarter mile lmao
There is also camera trickery involved the cybertuck is actually in front of the porsche at the starting line that's why there is no overhead shot of the start. The camera is set up at a slight angle to make it look like the front of the cars are in line. and the shape of the cars make it more dificult to see the camera angle trickery. but you can clearly see it when the camera starts moving the porsche is a bit faster in taking off, but the way the camera moves it makes it look like the ct is taking off faster at about 00.33 the ct is about the same speed as the porsche. in the cam angle from the front of the porsche the speed of both cars stay the same for a couple of second at about 02.88 the cybertruck starts going faster than the porsche. if it wasn't ahead at the start the porsche would have even won the eight mile.
It's actualluy quit the angle if you check on google earth you can see the blue piles in front of the concrete walls. and since they are not evenly space with the gaps in the concrete walls you can see exactly which pilon is which and where the camera was positioned and at what angle it's shooting and than you see how much the image is skewed to get the porsche and the ct fronts to line up it's more tha a couple feet so the ct would definitely not win the eight miles the lead the ct has at the end is less then the lead it had at the start.
Uh wait a minute. That wasn't a quarter mile, that was one eighth mile.
False advertising by tesla. This has been proven to be BS
That’s some genius marketing right there
Yep,
Tesla does not care about the Truth. Just like Nikola, Tesla "will fake it".
I am going to wait for a channel like Carwow to make a video like this and then I will see if it is actually true. I have a hard time believing that a 911 turbo s lost against a fully loaded cyber truck.
Edit: I just watched the Hagerty drag race and on a prepped surface the cyber truck with 845 HP goes a 11 sec flat for the quarter mile without a trailer and a car. The Porsche 911 turbo s 992 does a quarter mile in 9.9 sec on a prepped surface. It also does a 0 to 60 in 2.2 sec. This is what you call a false advertisement.
Oh yeah, this is absolutely manipulative. The "less than 11 seconds" and taglines "faster than a 911".... What? Around a track? Top speed? Quarter mile? Oh wait, the 911 is faster in every single one of those.
So many people in denial
Cool. Have fun taking a separate loan out to replace the battery when it folds lmaoooo
Can't wait to see the results if it was against a 911 Turbo S :)
without the load?
Looked t the specs and Porsche 9-11 turbo has 0-60 of 2.6 seconds which is same as highest trim tri motor cyber truck. But highest trim cybertruck cost 100,000 while Porsche cost 230,000. So cyber truck is not only faster, but has better value and utility.
A microwaved burger will not taste the same as a grilled burger!@@gj1234567899999
@@gj1234567899999 It doesn't have anything close to the Porsche's handling or build quality.
@@gj1234567899999Porsche quality and appearance is bounds better though
Oh thank god. Ive been really struggling at the drag strip with my F250 towing a random vehicle. This will definitely help.
Especially when this is deceptive marketing at its peak
What do you do with your pick up?
@@unclejesse4271bruh
@@unclejesse4271 drive it off road 🤦♂
🤣🤣🤣
suprised there a few things I can see are issues already. The hub caps will definately get smashed off on curbs. The concave button for the box cover will have water and dirt puddle and deteriorate the switch. The door handles and charging port cab on the wheel well will definately have dirt and mud build up with use on backroads and muddy conditions and will restrict the covers and latches from opening without pinching on the panels. On second look, the interior has lots of concave panels that are going to hold and trap dirt. I'm sure lots of these will get sorted in the near future.
Never in my life have a ever been so watching a yt video
EPIC!! When the Porsche 911 can go faster while being towed then actually driving itself you know the Cyber Truck is insane.
But Porsche is one beautiful looking car. Cybertruck on the other hand is a literal deformity. Even kindergarten students can come up with a better design
@@senpai1628 Hell no, all Porsche look the same and all of them look ugly. Had you put a McLaren, Ferrari or Lamborghini then yes they look much better but Porsche are all ugly with the same shape and design 🤢🤢
@@SRNAR8 because if it's not broken, it won't be fixed. At least Porsche's design is streamline and is updated with each generation, and not looking like a sharp angled mess. It's worked for over 60 years for enthusiasts with a timeless design.
what are you on about@@SRNAR8
@@SRNAR8 I'll take any Porsche over this cybertruck. Musk needs to fire the entire Tesla designing team. Most of their cars have excellent performance and features but look hella ugly
Its nice but let's try it again with the Turbo S
Sure but only if the turbo S is towing a turbo S
anything to put the cyber trunk against the odds... lol
And on a track like Leguna Seca??? How long will those tyres last? Brakes? Is it actually a safe vehicle to drive at speed?
impressive stuff!! but which one do you want to drive?
God that’s fast, almost as fast as the value depreciation the cyber truck will have over the 911
#butthurt #whiner
Top ten hot takes 2023
😂
Keep telling yourself that.
These trucks wont lose value like the regular cars on the market today, it is not plastic and cheap chassis that gives it this kind of performance.
Even the soundtrack pulls hard.
After watching and then seeing the full track at the end, it looks like the race was 1/8 mile not 1/4 mile. Though, still impressive.
Not bad for 1/8 mile race!
the tesla cybertruck is here after 4 years of revealing!
Worth the wait
and it's been 6 years since Roadster was revealed. Elon scamming people left, right and center
Making the impossible merely late. Meanwhile 5 years later I am still waiting for the 26 GM electric models and the famous "competition is coming".
Is it? Have they fulfilled all the preorders? Or are they focused on more ad stunts?
@@BasementTracksyou do have many ev and hybrid alternatives to Tesla, including Chevy bolt. If you're going to bring up promises, two years ago it was "financially insane" to buy any other car because Tesla was about to reach full automomy and have a million robotaxis driving around the US.
Today GM is still selling 6 times more cars that Tesla (not ev, sure, a decade later people still prefer traditional cars), Mercedes is selling cars with more autonomy than Tesla, Toyota and Hyunday are much more reliable cars than Tesla (lookup any customer survey in car magazine), and we have 0 robotaxis and 0 full automomy Tesla or even 90% autonomous miles, that Elon promised "in the next few months" in 2015 lol
Honestly doesn't matter how fast that abomination is, I will still point and laugh 😂🤣
because you cant afford one
@@prodbywoodygeneric internet response
@@prodbywoodyThey also lied, not even a quarter mile and it's a manual Carrera T
@@prodbywoodyNo it's because it's electric and it's hideous
@@fdjizm The truth hurts. The only fake laugh you get is in your imagination or virtually on the Internet pretending you have a nice car instead of your cringe mobile.
Looking forward to meeting one of these on the Nordschleife.
Pls tell me if there are stock strucks that would beat a sports car like what this Cybertruck just did…
Imagine comparing a microwave to a Traeger grill.
it hurts doesn't it. I'll send you the gas bill😂
@@thanosianthemadtitanic Why does it hurt? Can you elaborate?
@@thanosianthemadtitanic it hurts dont it? that they used the 1/8th instead of the quarter mile cuz they knew the cybertruck wasn't winning that
@kuvnatalejandro9466 it hurts more that farmer Joe brown is now outrunning your precious porsche on the way to whole foods. The mighty porsche has been PORCHed.👨🌾🛻🤠💨
@@thanosianthemadtitanic where? I don't see teslas competing in these worlds' most prestigious races. Show me the results.
What happened to channel logo
That's electric vs petrol. How many times can the Cyber truck do this without a recharge? How many times can the Porsche do it on one tank of fuel? Which one isn't ugly?
Misdirection at its finest. 1/8 mile.
WOW! that 911 on the back of cybertruck that is nuts
while this is really impressive, i gotta say they probably cheated a bit to get this done. if you watch closely, you can see the 911 starts without its launch controle (listen to the sound of the engine, it starts revving from down below also, pay attention to the body movement of the car.) so this would probably beat the cybertruck with its launch controle active. still, this is a very impressive achievement considering it having to tow all that weight.
edit for reference: here is a base 911 launching WITHOUT launch controle and im pretty sure this is the same rev pattern i can see and hear in the tesla video. czcams.com/users/shortsJb4LaULlXFM
This is also literally an 1/8th mile track.
Cant forget the trailer is most likely aluminum
It kinda seemed as the Porsche was going to pass the truck it let off as the nose dove quite a bit. I’d be impressed even if the truck lost an honest race but I’m kinda getting skeptical of Tesla as it seems the demo comparisons are always rigged.
@@htfab9251so? It's still a trailer with a Porsche on top.
Also it seems like a Manual Gearbox Porsche, meaning there are short dips in poweroutput which you can clearly see as when they shift the porsche starts to fall back a tiny bit. Automatics are better for dragraces #savethemanuals
Ok, it finishes the 1/8 mile faster against a manual 911, the lightest 911
As usual, Tesla cheated and lied:
Engineering Explained
czcams.com/video/HRYS5VWXZts/video.html
There is also camera trickery involved the cybertuck is actually in front of the porsche at the starting line that's why there is no overhead shot of the start. The camera is set up at a slight angle to make it look like the front of the cars are in line. and the shape of the cars make it more dificult to see the camera angle trickery. but you can clearly see it when the camera starts moving the porsche is a bit faster in taking off, but the way the camera moves it makes it look like the ct is taking off faster at about 00.33 the ct is about the same speed as the porsche. in the cam angle from the front of the porsche the speed of both cars stay the same for a couple of second at about 02.88 the cybertruck starts going faster than the porsche. if it wasn't ahead at the start the porsche would have even won the eight mile.
It's actualluy quit the angle if you check on google earth you can see the blue piles in front of the concrete walls. and since they are not evenly space with the gaps in the concrete walls you can see exactly which pilon is which and where the camera was positioned and at what angle it's shooting and than you see how much the image is skewed to get the porsche and the ct fronts to line up it's more tha a couple feet so the ct would definitely not win the eight miles the lead the ct has at the end is less then the lead it had at the start.
Send them both around a track, let's see how quickly the Cybertruck gets humbled
You are about to be surprised again.
it didn't even beat the porsche in a quarter mile. they had to lie about it and do an eighth 😭😭
omfg, the reveal at the end towing 911 totally flip flopped my already high expectations xd
.....i hope youre kidding
@@jazzabighits4473 I mean, you can always hope? xD Truck beating a sports car while towing that same sports car, a Porsche 911... what do you mean ??? This is ridiculous man.
@@gregggo it's fake
@@gregggoElon has mastered the marketing of useless drag races 😂. The Porsche is designed for a race track which involves beating on the engines, brakes, and suspension all while taking corners at a high speed in a controlled manner. They could care less about a 0-60 or 1/4 mile which is all the Tesla seems to be good at
@@jazzabighits4473 You're delusional. It is not fake, I follow Tesla long enough to know that.
I'll even take the 2004 boxter over this
At 0.18 you see the 911 about to overtake and suddenly the camera changes to a different angle...hmm
Now Batterie empty
I’d like to do this outside Scomo's house, the ex- prime minister of Australia.
He famously said about EVs "they wont tow your boat, & will ruin your weekends" Lmfao!
What does a few pulls down a drag strip have to do with pulling boats? Apples to oranges
@@callumdonington2227
He was disparaging EVs because he thought they couldn't tow anything.
He is an idiot, and likely being paid off by Toyota and the fossil fuel lobby in general.
I hate to break it to you but they aren't used for towing because of the range not because they can't do it
the cybertruck had a headstart
Love the camera angles, more drag races should have these!
Except the drone shot, the drone should've been wayyyy more to the back of the vehicle (you can only see the front of both cars)
camera angles to conceal the fact that this isn't a 1/4 mile
There is also camera trickery involved the cybertuck is actually in front of the porsche at the starting line that's why there is no overhead shot of the start. The camera is set up at a slight angle to make it look like the front of the cars are in line. and the shape of the cars make it more dificult to see the camera angle trickery. but you can clearly see it when the camera starts moving the porsche is a bit faster in taking off, but the way the camera moves it makes it look like the ct is taking off faster at about 00.33 the ct is about the same speed as the porsche. in the cam angle from the front of the porsche the speed of both cars stay the same for a couple of second at about 02.88 the cybertruck starts going faster than the porsche. if it wasn't ahead at the start the porsche would have even won the eight mile.
It's actualluy quit the angle if you check on google earth you can see the blue piles in front of the concrete walls. and since they are not evenly space with the gaps in the concrete walls you can see exactly which pilon is which and where the camera was positioned and at what angle it's shooting and than you see how much the image is skewed to get the porsche and the ct fronts to line up it's more tha a couple feet so the ct would definitely not win the eight miles the lead the ct has at the end is less then the lead it had at the start.
@@deedikjepijn they do that or else you would see it's completely faked. and the ct is way in front of the porsche at the start
Tesla, why was the cyber truck designed with ps2 graphics?
Correct me if I’m wrong. I believe the 911 they used is a Carrera T which only comes in a manual transmission.
An electric vehicle vs a manual transmission in a short race…. The manual loses everytime. Impressive nonetheless!
Also the driver of the Porsche had really bad shifts put it against another electric vehicle
The Carrera T usually has the "Carrera T" branding on the door, which is missing on the models shown in this video.
dont forget the fact that this is really just about how fast you start off. and the cybertruck has an electric motor.. so.. you know.. its obviously gonna have an advantage. this is misleading. acceleration is higher but it says nothing about top speed etc. so you are gonna be faster in a short track, or if you go through a lot of curves. but the top speed of a 911 is 330~ kmh. the cybertruck is about 180 kmh if the data is still correct
@@zero.Identity how is this misleading? Where did they claim, that CT has higher top speed?
@@onezweithree are you just playing dumb? you must be, right? its literally marketing. make it look better, those who dont know as much about cars will think "WOOOOW it smoked a 911" and do not mention the fact its actually 2x faster at top speed cuz that would be bad. and nobody can say you did that on purpose, cause you didnt say anything against it.
To be fair, they didn’t run it against a Porsche Taycan Turbo S. That would’ve been very different. Still impressive though.
Please explain where the "Turbo" is on a Taycan. As for besting the Taycan, the Tesla family sedan with 4 adults inside (S Plaid) beats it handily. 😂
@@shazam6274It's his official name!
They have electric turbos! My friends company works on them and their only client for them is Porsche. I still don't know how it works being electric but hey they exist! @@shazam6274
@@shazam6274it says so on the rear.
@@Deveonn So a meaningless lie. 😂
Now we need Airbus A380-800 vs Cybertruck towing an Airbus A380-800
0-60 in under 3 secs is amazing for any vehicle, let alone a truck thats also towing the car it beat.
U do know this is a Porsche Carrera T which is a 7 speed manual Transmission making it the slowest of all 911s,also they cut it off at the 1/8th mile the porsche wouldve won the 1/4 mile
Went from 100% charged to 40% after that pull.
That's the problem. Physics at play here you can't escape it
Probably not that much...but also...most of the vehicles running a 1/4 miles in less than 11 seconds burn ALL of the fuel they put in there.
Probably none of the other vehicles capable of doing less than 11 seconds even have a range near the cybertruck when driven more "calmly".
Super innovative and also funny. Very cool.
That has to be embarrassing for the Porsche
Atleast the Porsche tied with the towed Porsche win win
This really shows how good the engineering of the Porsche 911 is. It's so light that you can tow it with almost no slowdown.
That is some amazing mental gymnastics there.
@@BasementTracksthe daily does of cope-ium 😂😂
Relax everyone, that's a base 911. The cyberbeast won't stand a chance against the turbo or even the turbo s. 😂
But I do love this video.
They will not, because has become a religion (..) The question is why they picked a Porsche? Because they know is the reference (..)
weird cos thats a base cybertruck. what are you trying to say?
The 911 turbo 0-60 in 2.6 secs recorded 2.2, the turbo s is 2.1 secs, was recorded 1.8 secs. The cyberbeast high trim level makes 2.6 from 0-60, other cyber models are above 4 secs.
i have my doubts about the 1.8@@adepwr
oh my five seater pickem'uo truck can't hang with sports cars? oh no! hahaha that they're even in the same league is a sick flex for the Cybertruck
When you lower your graphics settings to get a higher frame rate
I wanna see a video of that cyber truck towing a Porsche around the track 😂
I absolutely didn’t expect that ending for the cybertruck to be loaded while beating the 911. Just amazing 🎉
the base model 911 is completely different from the fastest 911 which is called turbo s.
@@bhoomeerg8045 well it’s a truck against a sports car lol
It's the video title
I'm a huge Tesla and EV advocate, even though I currently drive a v8 sports car ( still drive a tesla too). This video is can't be true at all, unless the races against a 992 Carrera T M7 which is dumb IMO.
Stock a Cybertruck runs 11.0 @ 119 according to Hagerty's tests. It was around 11.2 according to carwow's test against the hummer EV pickup. A stock 911 base RWD according to caranddriver does 0-60 in 3.2 seconds and the 1/4 mile in 11.5 sec @ 120 mph. While the 911 Carrera rwd is cheapest and technically should be the slowest, it is not. That would go to the Carrera T M7. According to caranddriver, they could only achieve 0-60 in 4.0 seconds and 1/4 mile in 12.2 @ 116mph. Now times would be dependent on the driver since it all comes down the shifts.
Okay so lets assume a stock Cybetruck does 10.9 because tesla claimed under 11s and the Carrera T does 12.5 because the driver isn't the best shifter. This is all best case scenario for the Cybertruck by the way. The cybertruck is towing another a trailer (lets guess 1000lbs even though it likely is more) and another Porsche which weighs roughly 3300lbs according to caranddriver weights from various base/s/t 992 911 porsches. In other words the the cyber truck is pulling another 4300lbs at least is my guess which definitely adds more than 1 second the 1/4mile.
I know that because in carwow's video, they tried to make the race more fair for the Hummer EV pickup by adding 4 additional passengers to the Cybertruck. They were all full grown adults who claimed to weigh about 85kg or lets round to 190lbs. 4 x 190 = 760lbs extra weight which resulted in a 1/4 mile time of 11.5.
In this video we are guessing the Cybertruck is pulling an additional 4300lbs. 4300/760 = 5.657. In other words the cybertruck would require an additional 5.657 x .3 (according to the difference in carwow 1/4 mile times with 1 vs 5 passenger in the truck) = 1.69 or lets round down to 1.6 second. So 10.9+ 1.6 = 12.5 seconds.
This is literally the best case scenario in every possible way for the Cybertruck just to be equal with the slowest 911 with a meh driver shifting the car. I call BS as someone who drives a Tesla and a V8 muscle car.
@@user-sx2qe6tv4z you've reposted this comment like half a dozen times
Oh wow, a fast BEV, that's truly groundbreaking.
1/8 mile, slowest 911 top spec cybertruck ⚆_⚆
This is the most appealing video since Apple’s first MacBook Air coming out of an envelope.