Chris: “If we don’t know who committed the murder, we should accuse EVERYONE, including all fictional beings, because no evidence means equal evidence for everyone.”
It's probably that guy who does all the murders, always has done all the murders, but no one has actually spotted yet. His name is Luben Hurstwhangel. He drives a yellow Ford F-150.
Whenever someone starts a conversation by saying, "I'm going to construct a logical argument for...", buckle you seat belt, you're in for one hell of a ride.
Yeah, all my family says is, "you need to be open minded." I am open minded, it is just unbelievable. Hence why it is called faith, supernatural and miracles, not normal or natural. It is all so contradicting.
@@patientestant I am so glad that you are realistic. I used to love watching movies based on the Greek myths. In particular, the Cyclops and the fighting skeletons. I wanted them to be real, but they are just figleaves of the imagination.
I can defeat Creationism using the Bible. P1 Creationism relies on the Old Testament P2 Oh, but that's the Ooooold Testament Therefore there's no reason to accept Creationism
Another video of excellent discussions. These are equipping me with the tools necessary to conversate with my family with respect and intelligence. Thank you to all of the Atheist experience staff.
@@ringo666 Gosh, you're nice. So kind of you to share your superior knowledge in such a polite and sympathetic manner! Best wishes, from a language and linguistics teacher.
Atheism often leads to skepticism, skepticism leads to ability to better see untrue things. This leads to believing more true things and less false things.
Just imagine how our education system would suffer if we focused on all the theories on everything. Like if geography classes also taught the flat earth model.
Yeah, we already teach too many facts instead of skills, process, teamwork, and critical thinking. Memorizing facts for a test is a rather useless skill.
AGrayPhantom my geography professor was raised Amish. He loved to watch the jets fly overhead and was fascinated by their contrails. He said he realized by watching them that there was no way the earth was flat. He was beaten, shamed, for not believing. He eventually ran away and with help, finished his education. His family has ostracized him. I find that so sad. His hardships though, I felt, made him such a fabulous teacher. His love for learning, knowledge, made my classes with him the most enjoyable.
Please don't use the word "theory" like this in that context. One is a model describing facts about the environment we live in, being the pinnacle of what science can possibly achieve, the other is a spontaneous idea someone pulled from their ass. I hate how the word theory is defined so fundamentally different in a coloquial context than in a scientific context, but that's what it is. Please don't use the term as if they mean the same thing.
The creationist guy started with the proposition that the start of life should be at a simpler state than today's organism, then proceeded to explain how we can't rule out that a largely complex being could be responsible for the start of life. "But supernatural..." Well, there we go again.
If we are going to teach creation science as an alternative to evolution, then we should also teach the stork theory as an alternative to reproduction.
Re. the "Increasing complexity" argument: when a bird ends up on an island without predators and its descendants lose their wings (dodo, etc.) is that increasing or decreasing complexity?
So Chris wants taught in the classroom, given equal time, that some more complex being placed life on Earth as a competing theory to Evolution. I want to know what they are going to teach after the 30 seconds of material they have. "Aliens put life here. We think. Okay everyone, that's a wrap, all we got, see you next year." Everybody gets the rest of the semester off?
@@homemarketing9811 well, it could be more possible. Unless you can prove supernatural. Not to mention proving you god. Primordial soup or magic man....hmmmmmm....
@@homemarketing9811 I've seen stupid retorts that strawman reality before. This comment of yours is among the most moronic. I can only assume you're referring to "primordial soup", which is a handy phrase, but no more accurate than "DNA is a code", or "the complexity of life couldn't have come about without an ultimate mind". If primordial soup is your reference, what gave you the idea that the earth's surface was rocks back then? The planet was formed by dust. When you can meaningfully add to discussion, you're welcome to join. As long as you're going to keep being a troll, you can fuck off.
I've always thought that any new life created through abiogenesis in current times would immediately be devoured by any of the bacteria floating around the planet before it could even be identified.
Because he was invented by humans with good imaginations. He is as real as Santa Claus, the tooth fairy, and Trump's brain. All invisible except to believers. (*_*)@@RonaldStepp
@@RonaldStepp He does pretty well because his father made Trump synonymous with excellence. Donald has filed for bankruptcy multiple times and has been sued over almost all of his own ventures. He made his money by selling his daddy's name. He is an idiot. That's why the religious believe in him. They will believe anything on faith.
He has no clue what he is talking about, he can't explain what he means, he wants something that has no evidence for in a science class. How the hell can you teach something in a science class that you can not test with the scientific methods.
Even when I was in high school in the early 1990s we learnt about the possibility of panspermia in science and in history. The idea of life originating from another planet and being deposited here goes back to about 600 BC.
On Islam. . .I do not believe that we can allow religious no-go zones. If a gay couple cannot walk the street holding hands safely then the religion/gang/group should suffer.
~ Easter season 2019: Thank you, Tracie and Matt, as these archived videos are still interesting and relevant. Rhetorical question: How do so many callers advocate vehemently for their "sacred" books (see Quran & Buybull in particular) without most having actually read ANY of them cover to cover? Cheers, DAVEDJ ~
Chris: I don't know what happened to create life in the first place, so in addition to using the current natural evidence that we have to support very plausible speculations on how life may have begun and then very reasonably telling students that "in truth, we don't know", I think we should also make the outrageous, unsupported claim that a supernatural being who is vastly more complex than ourselves *HAD* to have created the earth only 6,000 years ago, because that's what Creationism states. Even though there's absolutely no evidence to support that the ladder option is even remotely possible, and it would be way more reasonable to say "we don't know but we have an idea due to the experiments we've done", Chris wants to add "an equally possible explanation is that a supernatural being created the earth and all life 6,000 years ago, even though we have no evidence to support that a supernatural being can even exist in the first place, let alone create the entire earth and all life". Matt was right when he said Chris is an idiot.
I've always thought the government shouldn't be in the marriage business. The government should only be doing civil unions. Then any religion can do whatever marriages they want, according to their values. Certain churches or mosques can permit only straight marriages. Other churches can sanction gay marriages. Other churches can even do polygamous marriages. Marriages should be a solely religious ceremony and the secular portion should cover the legal piece through civil unions. Then any given couple could opt for just a civil union or just a marriage or both depending on what suits them. This seems like the optimal system.
We are told an all-knowing God designed the incredible complexities of all life, yet was so unimaginative & primitive it could only resolve issues by killing people.
The name for the primary universe creating pixie? Peter Panspermia. I hereby semi-trademark it. I googled it just now. Only about 7 hits total. 1 exact match. It's a song in which the musician used a biology lecture as sound samples. So he has rights to the song title. I claim trademark and licensing for the character itself. In all media, past present future yada yada. For perpetuity. Or the maximal perpetuity as legally possible.
Does anyone know where in time earth 4.5B years age is in the 14.5B years of the universe i.e. is it likely to have been toward the end of the 14.5B measurement or the middle rather than the early years. What does scientists found or estimated ?
Yes, first you need to adjust your figures to the correct one. The best estimate of the age of the universe is 13.77 billion years. (13.77- 4.54) billion years the solar system was created, the Sun a little bit (~1 - 100 million years) earlier than the Earth. We call the population of stars created around 1-10 billion years ago, population 1 stars. There are three populations in the model, however population III stars have never so far been observed.
@@tedgrant2 stop lying to yourself; clearly Morgan Freeman created everything. He narrates documentarys and nature makes it so. Dare ye not give credit to your false idol of the god of spinach
Another ignorant conflating the theory of evolutuion by means of natural selection, with abiogenesis.....little tip, those are two different subjects...
The problem isn't "religion" as such but rather "ideology" of which religion is but one variant, albeit a particularly ubiquitous one. The problem is that the moment you start seeing existence through the eyes of an ideology you're finished. The "truth" is not constructed it is discovered. Ideologies pretend to hold truths prior to, independent from, and often in opposition to, that discovery process. This is why no reality every really fits an ideology and why ideologies invariably fail so miserably at describing the real world. As a consequence, ideologues invariably find it necessary to reject actual reality and reconstruct a different one, an artificial one, that comports with their ideology.
I wonder if it’s possible that abiogenesis has actually happened on Earth more than once… but any occurrence of life spontaneously appearing would have gotten annihilated by all of the bacteria and viruses created by the first occurrence of abiogenesis. Any other occurrence other than the first one would have no immunities built up to protect them from the mutations and evolutions that the first occurrence had acquired over time. Is it possible? I’m not a scientist so I have no idea.
This is a classic. He argues that we'd expect to see something like the first example of 'life' continuing to 'pop into existence'..... and he argues that we don't...... How the F*CK does he KNOW what to look for so that he can KNOW that...? What did that original life form LOOK like? How can we tell that it's NOT continuing to do so? Let's pick some numbers. Let's assume, it takes a million years of random chance to bring the right atoms together within the WHOLE of all the oceans of the earth to create a 'living object' from non-living objects (a new 'a-biogenesis' event). So, once every million years, somewhere in all the oceans 'new' life pops into existence from 'dead' chemicals. How the F*** would you FIND it? The chances are that 'it' would be 'eaten' by some already massively evolved life form or would fail to flourish because something that formed billions of years earlier has already filled the niche that the 'new' life could utilise. We can't even be sure if identical copies of the 'original a-biogenesis 'life' still exist today...... how would we KNOW it was identical to the original...... and how would we know if we have found a copy of the original..... or another original? They won't have chassis numbers or 'sell by' dates on them!
Chris:”There is equal evidence that life began through natural means and life was created.” If you’re gonna tell a lie, make it a whopper. Chris couldn’t show ANY evidence that life was created by his sky fairy.🤤
I have always wondered what a creationist class structure looks like…the entire course could be taught in 2 minutes, and the answer to every question on the test is “god did it”. What do they do with the remaining time in the semester?🤔
We should teach creationism. We should teach the creation story of every religion. Then it will become apparent that mythologizing on the origins of the world is an innate impulse of every culture and that each narrative is cobbling of an ignorant mind with no more insight into the truth than any other.
Catholic fascism: the cherished belief that the greatest good and the most perfect love in the universe are embodied in the figure of an abusive and neglectful father
Yes, if you believe or give credence to the Jewish and Christian holey ( yes lots of holes ) books you literally have to BUY BULL ! Should be renamed , " the holey buy bull " !
For all we know maybe new life does pop up and we don’t notice it because we don’t have microscopes on even inch of the planet and that new life would be so simple it would be destroyed by the things that already exist
You're microphone keeps rumbling when you move around. It makes me stereo speakers distort and pop. This is not good for my stereo speakers and it's not pleasant while listening.
i knew it was the guy who ends up saying ''ooh evouloootion''? dunno if its this call yet im watching it now! twat either way and does not like most thiests understand it onr bit!
Basically: Chris is proposing to teach creationism science wich means "We know nothing but possibly life was created" and this is like what? 10 minutes of class? And as i know from my time in school biology teachers already mention that. WHAT IS THERE TO TEACH EXCLUDING BIBLE BS AND GENESIS??????? Also in no way evolution is a fundamental part of biology. We could study biology finely even without evolution which we did before.
What does feeling guilty feel like? I honestly have no idea I'm convinced that I don't feel guilty ever about anything but becasue I don't know what feeling guilty is like. How can I know if I feel guilty?🤷♂️
@ConfusionFusion I see a psysch every month what confuses them is that I do appear to have empathy but I don't know what feeling guilty feels like, perhaps I've never done anything to feel guilty about or I simply don't have that emotion.
@ConfusionFusionIs empathy, not an emotion that you feel when someone has died and you feel sad for not only your own loss but for the others around you? You see 5 years ago my dog and my father died on the same weekend my father helped me bury her then the next day he passed away one year later I woke up cuddling my wife's corpse this wrecked me in a way I can't put into words, but the loss of my wife (I was 43 she was 46) brought out an emotion I had never felt before along with the feelings I had earlier with my father and dog. I believe this to be sadness anger and empathy, I could be wrong. I can't say if I have never hurt another I am merely saying that if I did perhaps I was unaware of it. Basically, I don't understand what some feelings should feel like. Guilt regret and the thing people call a conscious I simply don't know and no one can seem to explain to me what it feels like so how can I know what feelings are what.
Chris claims he’s trying to defend creationism, but he spends most of his time lying about evolution. No matter how many lies he claims, that will never help him justify creationism.💩
37:00 Guilt is part of a survival mechanism, which allows an individual the ability to moderate behavior. As social primates, our wellbeing, and survival depend upon membership, and cooperation within our social groupings. Sigmund Freud explained, and mapped out the Human Psyche very well: The three layer structure: Super-Ego; Ego; Id. The science of Behavior Psychology has replaced both Philosophy & Religion.
Matt knows damn good and well that naturalism is presupposed by what he advocates for, as to what should be allowed in the classroom. So it was disingenuous of Matt to act like what he wants , doesn't promote atheistic naturalism by implication. So the point is, that the issue is similar for the atheist side also. Meaning that similar to how what the theist wants, would promote theism by implication, its also the case that the atheistic side on this issue, promotes atheistic naturalism by implication.
Mad respect for Anthony 🫶🏻…find as many true things and as few false things to believe and I believe he is truly trying to do that and that is extremely respectable 👏🏻
Chris: “If we don’t know who committed the murder, we should accuse EVERYONE, including all fictional beings, because no evidence means equal evidence for everyone.”
It's probably that guy who does all the murders, always has done all the murders, but no one has actually spotted yet.
His name is Luben Hurstwhangel. He drives a yellow Ford F-150.
Never ceases to amaze me how religion completely fucks up a persons ability to think clearly.
Never ceases to amaze me how Democrats are completely fine with their political party enforcing slavery in the United States for sixty years.
A literal virus for the brain. When you hear them ramble that is just their psychological infection manifesting.
God works in mysterious ways! Lol
Gods I miss these two on the air together.
I think Chris' biology class involved coloring books.
Some people just can't be reached.
With dinosaurs!
Another graduate of the The Ken Ham Institute for Advanced Circular Reasoning.
@@Brammy007a 👍😂
Now, now...
Whenever someone starts a conversation by saying, "I'm going to construct a logical argument for...", buckle you seat belt, you're in for one hell of a ride.
Not if it is a religious. They just sit there and spin their wheels.
"...hell of a ride..." Cheeky!! ;)
James West ...hell of a ride.....with someone who doesn’t know how to drive.
Like all creatards, Chris is deliberately blind to anything that disagrees with his mythos
23:25
First call.
Even if religion does good things and makes people happy, I still can't believe nonsense.
Yeah, all my family says is, "you need to be open minded." I am open minded, it is just unbelievable. Hence why it is called faith, supernatural and miracles, not normal or natural. It is all so contradicting.
@@patientestant
I am so glad that you are realistic.
I used to love watching movies based on the Greek myths.
In particular, the Cyclops and the fighting skeletons.
I wanted them to be real, but they are just figleaves of the imagination.
Heroin and hookers make some people happy that doesn't mean they are good things.
@@tedgrant2 I remember the fighting skeletons - stop action animation by Harry Harihausen in the 1950s. As a kid, I thought they were cool.
@@The22on
One of my favourites is Bedazzled with Liz Hurley.
She was cool.
I can defeat Creationism using the Bible.
P1 Creationism relies on the Old Testament
P2 Oh, but that's the Ooooold Testament
Therefore there's no reason to accept Creationism
Another video of excellent discussions. These are equipping me with the tools necessary to conversate with my family with respect and intelligence. Thank you to all of the Atheist experience staff.
Hmm...interesting irony. You feel better equipped to deal with the family intelligently, yet you use the non-word "conversate".
It's "converse".
@@ringo666 Thx I apreesh u r awesome 👌.
@@ringo666 Gosh, you're nice. So kind of you to share your superior knowledge in such a polite and sympathetic manner! Best wishes, from a language and linguistics teacher.
Mark Brewster did you know Hitlers speech writer was also a grammar nazi…
Atheism often leads to skepticism, skepticism leads to ability to better see untrue things.
This leads to believing more true things and less false things.
Probably more accurate to say that skepticism leads to atheism.
@@origamiswami6272 lmfaoooo
Tracie is so good at talking to people like Anthony.
Matt covers the analytical side so well but Tracie is the compassionate yet honest side.
I feel sorry for Anthony...the poisoning of hearts and minds religions causes is criminal.
"Welcome to class. Aliens or god might have put life here. Well that's it. Class finished"
Wow, this all boiled down to Chris not understanding the use of the word "natural" in science.
I better hear about the theory of the cosmic cow in chis' science class room.
Did Chris have a logic-bypass operation?
😆
A logicectomy 😂😂😂
Just imagine how our education system would suffer if we focused on all the theories on everything. Like if geography classes also taught the flat earth model.
Yeah, we already teach too many facts instead of skills, process, teamwork, and critical thinking. Memorizing facts for a test is a rather useless skill.
AGrayPhantom my geography professor was raised Amish. He loved to watch the jets fly overhead and was fascinated by their contrails. He said he realized by watching them that there was no way the earth was flat. He was beaten, shamed, for not believing. He eventually ran away and with help, finished his education. His family has ostracized him. I find that so sad. His hardships though, I felt, made him such a fabulous teacher. His love for learning, knowledge, made my classes with him the most enjoyable.
Please don't use the word "theory" like this in that context.
One is a model describing facts about the environment we live in, being the pinnacle of what science can possibly achieve, the other is a spontaneous idea someone pulled from their ass.
I hate how the word theory is defined so fundamentally different in a coloquial context than in a scientific context, but that's what it is. Please don't use the term as if they mean the same thing.
@@patientestant Well you're not wrong, but not right
@@patientestant A person should know the location and position of his home planet.
The creationist guy started with the proposition that the start of life should be at a simpler state than today's organism, then proceeded to explain how we can't rule out that a largely complex being could be responsible for the start of life.
"But supernatural..."
Well, there we go again.
If we are going to teach creation science as an alternative to evolution, then we should also teach the stork theory as an alternative to reproduction.
I love the way they handled the last caller. Well done.
Let's teach every religious creation story in Science class!
JIM MORGAN That would be a great way to kill religion.
Teach in what way?
@@chelseag7522 The same way creationist idiots would teach creationism.
Dean Martin Lol
Re. the "Increasing complexity" argument: when a bird ends up on an island without predators and its descendants lose their wings (dodo, etc.) is that increasing or decreasing complexity?
So Chris wants taught in the classroom, given equal time, that some more complex being placed life on Earth as a competing theory to Evolution.
I want to know what they are going to teach after the 30 seconds of material they have. "Aliens put life here. We think. Okay everyone, that's a wrap, all we got, see you next year."
Everybody gets the rest of the semester off?
I would have killed to have a class like that.
So u have faith that it rained on rocks made soup and now ur here?
@@homemarketing9811 well, it could be more possible. Unless you can prove supernatural. Not to mention proving you god. Primordial soup or magic man....hmmmmmm....
@@homemarketing9811 I've seen stupid retorts that strawman reality before. This comment of yours is among the most moronic.
I can only assume you're referring to "primordial soup", which is a handy phrase, but no more accurate than "DNA is a code", or "the complexity of life couldn't have come about without an ultimate mind". If primordial soup is your reference, what gave you the idea that the earth's surface was rocks back then? The planet was formed by dust.
When you can meaningfully add to discussion, you're welcome to join. As long as you're going to keep being a troll, you can fuck off.
I've always thought that any new life created through abiogenesis in current times would immediately be devoured by any of the bacteria floating around the planet before it could even be identified.
You're probably right. I can't imagine many spits on earth where bacteria can't exist.
Ty tracie. Love you for this
But, Joe Bob died for your sins, Matt.
Tracie, Matt.... here is the question you should be asking, "What course material would you include in the Creationism part of the class?"
The Creator is invisible so Creationist materials would be invisible.
Locutus D'Borg so if the creator is invisble how do you know he exists?
Because he was invented by humans with good imaginations. He is as real as Santa Claus, the tooth fairy, and Trump's brain. All invisible except to believers. (*_*)@@RonaldStepp
Locutus D'Borg i wouldn’t mind having a brain like Trump, he seems to do pretty well over time.
@@RonaldStepp He does pretty well because his father made Trump synonymous with excellence. Donald has filed for bankruptcy multiple times and has been sued over almost all of his own ventures. He made his money by selling his daddy's name. He is an idiot. That's why the religious believe in him. They will believe anything on faith.
One of my favorite episodes because of the last caller.
Beautiful human interaction!
He has no clue what he is talking about, he can't explain what he means, he wants something that has no evidence for in a science class.
How the hell can you teach something in a science class that you can not test with the scientific methods.
It is rare to find someone as informed about science as Chris from Michigan. I could listen to him for hours! fart sound
Anthony, and others like him, is the main reason AXP does the show. What's the harm? This is a small sample.
Chris, are you okay?
Have you had a stroke or something?
Matt’s “w00t!” at the end 😆
Even when I was in high school in the early 1990s we learnt about the possibility of panspermia in science and in history. The idea of life originating from another planet and being deposited here goes back to about 600 BC.
Nice shirt Matt!!
He wore it again on The Line recently.
On Islam. . .I do not believe that we can allow religious no-go zones. If a gay couple cannot walk the street holding hands safely then the religion/gang/group should suffer.
~ Easter season 2019: Thank you, Tracie and Matt, as these archived videos are still interesting and relevant. Rhetorical question: How do so many callers advocate vehemently for their "sacred" books (see Quran & Buybull in particular) without most having actually read ANY of them cover to cover? Cheers, DAVEDJ ~
Chris: I don't know what happened to create life in the first place, so in addition to using the current natural evidence that we have to support very plausible speculations on how life may have begun and then very reasonably telling students that "in truth, we don't know", I think we should also make the outrageous, unsupported claim that a supernatural being who is vastly more complex than ourselves *HAD* to have created the earth only 6,000 years ago, because that's what Creationism states.
Even though there's absolutely no evidence to support that the ladder option is even remotely possible, and it would be way more reasonable to say "we don't know but we have an idea due to the experiments we've done", Chris wants to add "an equally possible explanation is that a supernatural being created the earth and all life 6,000 years ago, even though we have no evidence to support that a supernatural being can even exist in the first place, let alone create the entire earth and all life". Matt was right when he said Chris is an idiot.
I've always thought the government shouldn't be in the marriage business. The government should only be doing civil unions. Then any religion can do whatever marriages they want, according to their values. Certain churches or mosques can permit only straight marriages. Other churches can sanction gay marriages. Other churches can even do polygamous marriages. Marriages should be a solely religious ceremony and the secular portion should cover the legal piece through civil unions. Then any given couple could opt for just a civil union or just a marriage or both depending on what suits them. This seems like the optimal system.
We are told an all-knowing God designed the incredible complexities of all life, yet was so unimaginative & primitive it could only resolve issues by killing people.
I love the shirt.
The name for the primary universe creating pixie? Peter Panspermia.
I hereby semi-trademark it. I googled it just now. Only about 7 hits total. 1 exact match. It's a song in which the musician used a biology lecture as sound samples. So he has rights to the song title. I claim trademark and licensing for the character itself. In all media, past present future yada yada. For perpetuity. Or the maximal perpetuity as legally possible.
And merchandising!!! All depictions. I'm just saying. The moral right of the, er, creator has been asserted.
He argue that we should guess and speculate filosophical arguments in science
The audio is really low and bad but when Matt starts yelling it’s loud as fuck lol I’m at work and I had to turn it down
Poor Chris
religious leaders understand very well secular government: the loss of their political power. religion is politics.
Does anyone know where in time earth 4.5B years age is in the 14.5B years of the universe i.e. is it likely to have been toward the end of the 14.5B measurement or the middle rather than the early years. What does scientists found or estimated ?
Yes, first you need to adjust your figures to the correct one. The best estimate of the age of the universe is 13.77 billion years. (13.77- 4.54) billion years the solar system was created, the Sun a little bit (~1 - 100 million years) earlier than the Earth. We call the population of stars created around 1-10 billion years ago, population 1 stars. There are three populations in the model, however population III stars have never so far been observed.
There is equal evidence that life started accidentally as that Popeye created life.
Therefore we should teach Popeye in science classes.
But Popeye is presumably living, therefore he can’t create the first life.
@@larjkok1184
Likewise, God is living.
@@tedgrant2 stop lying to yourself; clearly Morgan Freeman created everything. He narrates documentarys and nature makes it so. Dare ye not give credit to your false idol of the god of spinach
Popeye the sailorman TOOOOOT
Another ignorant conflating the theory of evolutuion by means of natural selection, with abiogenesis.....little tip, those are two different subjects...
The problem isn't "religion" as such but rather "ideology" of which religion is but one variant, albeit a particularly ubiquitous one. The problem is that the moment you start seeing existence through the eyes of an ideology you're finished. The "truth" is not constructed it is discovered. Ideologies pretend to hold truths prior to, independent from, and often in opposition to, that discovery process. This is why no reality every really fits an ideology and why ideologies invariably fail so miserably at describing the real world. As a consequence, ideologues invariably find it necessary to reject actual reality and reconstruct a different one, an artificial one, that comports with their ideology.
I wonder if it’s possible that abiogenesis has actually happened on Earth more than once… but any occurrence of life spontaneously appearing would have gotten annihilated by all of the bacteria and viruses created by the first occurrence of abiogenesis. Any other occurrence other than the first one would have no immunities built up to protect them from the mutations and evolutions that the first occurrence had acquired over time. Is it possible? I’m not a scientist so I have no idea.
New life could arise on earth often, but it would always be immediately killed by better adjusted life that already evolved there.
This is a classic. He argues that we'd expect to see something like the first example of 'life' continuing to 'pop into existence'..... and he argues that we don't...... How the F*CK does he KNOW what to look for so that he can KNOW that...? What did that original life form LOOK like? How can we tell that it's NOT continuing to do so?
Let's pick some numbers. Let's assume, it takes a million years of random chance to bring the right atoms together within the WHOLE of all the oceans of the earth to create a 'living object' from non-living objects (a new 'a-biogenesis' event). So, once every million years, somewhere in all the oceans 'new' life pops into existence from 'dead' chemicals. How the F*** would you FIND it? The chances are that 'it' would be 'eaten' by some already massively evolved life form or would fail to flourish because something that formed billions of years earlier has already filled the niche that the 'new' life could utilise. We can't even be sure if identical copies of the 'original a-biogenesis 'life' still exist today...... how would we KNOW it was identical to the original...... and how would we know if we have found a copy of the original..... or another original? They won't have chassis numbers or 'sell by' dates on them!
That is exactly what I was thinking. New life could arise from chemicals often, but it would immediately be eaten or killed by what is already there.
Chris:”There is equal evidence that life began through natural means and life was created.”
If you’re gonna tell a lie, make it a whopper. Chris couldn’t show ANY evidence that life was created by his sky fairy.🤤
I have always wondered what a creationist class structure looks like…the entire course could be taught in 2 minutes, and the answer to every question on the test is “god did it”. What do they do with the remaining time in the semester?🤔
The dinosaurs were complex, but aint around anymore:-)
We should teach creationism. We should teach the creation story of every religion. Then it will become apparent that mythologizing on the origins of the world is an innate impulse of every culture and that each narrative is cobbling of an ignorant mind with no more insight into the truth than any other.
Chris is just being sneaky about getting god into schools and that’s disgusting.
We know that nature exists. Therefore a natural answer to why life is here is ahead of any creation idea as to why life is here
Look at the ACA continue to benefit from Matt’s videos even though they treat(ed) him like shit.
Chris:”Evolution is essential to biology.”
Failing to understand evolution is essential to religious apologists.🙈
Evolution is essential for biology, though. Most of our biology is founded on evolution.
23:26 Chris (MI) "Rational argument for teaching creationism in science class".
44:38 Anthony (AR) Guilt attendant on religious doubt.
One possible cause of the universe is that it was created by Superman.
So it follows logically that Superman should be a topic in science classes.
Super Manspermia?
Peter Panspermia. The universe creating pixie.
@@brucebaker810
That is another well known topic for science classes
Pixie god analog. Or Pixie/God analogy. Either works.
the religion of kryptonite
Remember Charlie Ebdo and consider islams violent intolerance to being challenged.
Catholic fascism: the cherished belief that the greatest good and the most perfect love in the universe are embodied in the figure of an abusive and neglectful father
Expecting life to pop into existence, oh boy.
Yes, if you believe or give credence to the Jewish and Christian holey ( yes lots of holes ) books you literally have to BUY BULL !
Should be renamed ,
" the holey buy bull " !
For all we know maybe new life does pop up and we don’t notice it because we don’t have microscopes on even inch of the planet and that new life would be so simple it would be destroyed by the things that already exist
If there is even one spot on earth without any bacteria, it will be filled with them immediately.
You're microphone keeps rumbling when you move around. It makes me stereo speakers distort and pop. This is not good for my stereo speakers and it's not pleasant while listening.
Them join us in the modern era and watch on your cell phone.
@@RareCandyRehab if you have decent earphones, you get the same pops.
i knew it was the guy who ends up saying ''ooh evouloootion''? dunno if its this call yet im watching it now! twat either way and does not like most thiests understand it onr bit!
Yeah, like this guy, that other? guy cited science. Just not counting evo as part of it.
Basically: Chris is proposing to teach creationism science wich means "We know nothing but possibly life was created" and this is like what? 10 minutes of class? And as i know from my time in school biology teachers already mention that.
WHAT IS THERE TO TEACH EXCLUDING BIBLE BS AND GENESIS???????
Also in no way evolution is a fundamental part of biology. We could study biology finely even without evolution which we did before.
What does feeling guilty feel like? I honestly have no idea I'm convinced that I don't feel guilty ever about anything but becasue I don't know what feeling guilty is like. How can I know if I feel guilty?🤷♂️
@ConfusionFusion I see a psysch every month what confuses them is that I do appear to have empathy but I don't know what feeling guilty feels like, perhaps I've never done anything to feel guilty about or I simply don't have that emotion.
@@Woodesies Depends on what you mean are you talking about in real life, in dreams or in videogames? In real life none.
@ConfusionFusionIs empathy, not an emotion that you feel when someone has died and you feel sad for not only your own loss but for the others around you? You see 5 years ago my dog and my father died on the same weekend my father helped me bury her then the next day he passed away one year later I woke up cuddling my wife's corpse this wrecked me in a way I can't put into words, but the loss of my wife (I was 43 she was 46) brought out an emotion I had never felt before along with the feelings I had earlier with my father and dog. I believe this to be sadness anger and empathy, I could be wrong.
I can't say if I have never hurt another I am merely saying that if I did perhaps I was unaware of it. Basically, I don't understand what some feelings should feel like. Guilt regret and the thing people call a conscious I simply don't know and no one can seem to explain to me what it feels like so how can I know what feelings are what.
Chris claims he’s trying to defend creationism, but he spends most of his time lying about evolution. No matter how many lies he claims, that will never help him justify creationism.💩
37:00 Guilt is part of a survival mechanism, which allows an individual the ability to moderate behavior. As social primates, our wellbeing, and survival depend upon membership, and cooperation within our social groupings. Sigmund Freud explained, and mapped out the Human Psyche very well: The three layer structure: Super-Ego; Ego; Id. The science of Behavior Psychology has replaced both Philosophy & Religion.
Charlie Hebdo.
Is Matt actually Guy Fieri?
Yea without the spiked blonde hair.
Look up the Jaboody Dubs version. You won't be disappointed.
Matt knows damn good and well that naturalism is presupposed by what he advocates for, as to what should be allowed in the classroom. So it was disingenuous of Matt to act like what he wants , doesn't promote atheistic naturalism by implication.
So the point is, that the issue is similar for the atheist side also. Meaning that similar to how what the theist wants, would promote theism by implication, its also the case that the atheistic side on this issue, promotes atheistic naturalism by implication.
How they let him go..🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯
Mad respect for Anthony 🫶🏻…find as many true things and as few false things to believe and I believe he is truly trying to do that and that is extremely respectable 👏🏻