This 2013 LEGO Star Wars Set IS SO CONFUSING!
Vložit
- čas přidán 5. 07. 2024
- This 2013 LEGO Star Wars AT-RT walker has given me so many questions to ask: "Is it from Umbara?" "Is it from Kiros?" "Have I gone completely insane?" I don't know the answer to any but the last one.
0:50 I made this video before the lamppost video so that joke made a bit more sense then.
I love how all of the video is about which location the set is based on, fully ignoring how the AT-RT is WAY OVERSIZED and out of scale.
Yeah
The set is based on the first episode of the zygerrian arc same as the BARC Speeder. There are multiple 501st AT-RTs and troopers in the opening scene and there are sniper droidekas and commando droids too. The umbara backgrojnd is probably just to match the other 501st sets and the yoda figure was probably just to insert a desirable/popular figure to boost sales.
Edit: ahsoka WAS on umbara but she was leading the Starfighter battle alongside bariss as you can see them in the opening for the battle of umbara in their delta-7s.
You sound a little like Darth maul in the beginning but in all honesty you're probably right about the set not being based on Umbra
u mean umbara?
Yep
Barriss Offee and Ahsoka Tano are part of the Umbaran campaign, and are briefly seen in the space battle during the opening narration in this episode. This was from a google search I did which makes me lean more towards it being paired with the other umbera sets
You’re a genius. I also thought you were Shakespeare for a second.
😆😆 I try to be.
I had this set when I was a kid, lot of fond memories with the 2011-2013 Lego waves. absolutely peak
2013 and 2014 for me. Absolutely the best.
I’m glad I am not the only one…
My sanity has been restored…
Fun fact. I got this set as a gift for a friend, but I missed his bday party or something.
So I kept the set lol.
😆 That’s awesome.
Hi, I'm almost positive this wave of clone wars sets are based off the scenes in the clone wars set on Umbara and Kiros (Ahsoka's people's home planet). Both of these arcs happened in season 4 but the Kidnapped (Kiros) arc didn't have many scenes that would adjust well into playsets while the Umbara arc was perfect for many playsets.
So lego sort of mashed the two arcs together to make these 4 sets. 3 of which (the atrt, z95, and umbaran walker) were more closely tied to the Umbara arc but had sprinkles of the Kidnapped arc in there with the sniper droideka and Ahsoka appearing. Meanwhile, the speeder bike with Obi Wan and Captain Rex is the only set that is clearly tied to the arc on Kiros.
As to why Yoda appears in the atrt set... I've honestly got no clue. My only theory would be because the Lego Yoda Chronicles were happening around this time, Lego might've wanted to shove him into some more sets.
Always love your videos! They are so unique, and you can turn literally any idea into a fun video! Keep up the great work!
Congrats on winning an argument with yourself!
😂😂 Sometimes I’m the hardest person for me to beat in an argument.
But he didn't even win lol
Can't forget the ahsoka aat lego set that is supposed to be a siege of mandalore set but it includes two battle droids and a aat 😂.
Lol, yeah that's the best example.
i think this is just an example of the lego designers getting not enough info before the release of the sets/shows respectively, which might ex[lain why the figures and box art dont match up.
Dude I remember getting this set and being so hyped to have not only a 501st Clone but a damn Commando Droid and a Droideka Sniper? We need more Clone Wars sets lol
Conclusion: Lego do whatever tf they want
Wow. 7 minutes of my life I will never get back 😂
It was worth it though, right? Right?
@@crazydog1750 for the monologue at the beginning? - sure, I'll give you that.
5:55 there’s a canonical second battle of christophsis that happens in the novels slightly before revenge of the sith. Still the mini figures would be inaccurate seeing as though only the 212th fought there.
Really enjoyed the video, it is peculiar what setting/scene lego picks for set boxart sometimes
You aren’t wrong… this thing is random as hell
That was one of my favorite sets as a kid
It’s a good one for sure.
i was gifted this lego set multiple times independently by several family members during my 8th birthday
My older brother had this set! I never even bothered to think about what the set was based on. My opinion is it’s just LEGO’s common sets not based on anything specific, and they just threw some Star Wars stuff together 😂
He’ll be fine
Woah-the Rey battle pack man himself! Long time no see.
Omg I got this set for my birthday when I was a lad! Such nice memories 😊
Lego usually just slaps random figures and builds to add extra play.
Indeed they love to do that. 😆 Glad they do it too.
This was a kick in the balls of a reminder to go take my Legos back from my dad’s place. I had that set but it was missing the axle in the waist so it was immediately scrapped for parts since I couldn’t get halfway through the instructions
Lol, I hope you got your collection back.
5:37 also don’t forget that many of the early clone wars sets have inaccurate box art showing Geonosis/Christophisis
Anyway I think the set along with the speeder bike were probably just made to go with the Z-95 but technically inspired by different episodes. The same is true for the 2010 Arc-170 which was advertised along CW sets despite not being one, and included Fisto who never appeared in any CW sets
What up
the simplest answer is that its based on both to a degree, which i feel can be argued for a lot of "scene innacurate" lego sets. i dont think lego sets out to recreate a scene accuratly, just make a good set and base it of off a few things for theming. likely made the at-rt and fitted it with the umbara theming, then chose some interesting at-rt related minifigs even if they werent scene relevant, instead of choosing boring minifigs or more of the same that you could get in the other set
also its very oversized, and i had it as a kid and the clone had misaligned helmet printing, it was off by like 30 degrees
Sooooo in the comercials it is always on umbara... but the Christophsis thing kind of broke me and i am now, too, not sure
Fun fact: Ahsoka is actually present on Umbara and can be seen in her star fighter
It's not fun for me... that means I was wrong! 😆
I used to have this set and i think this was my first lego star wars set
I had this battle pack as a kid. 😂
One of the few builds that are oversized instead of undersized.
5:40 I didn't realize that was supposed to be Christophsis. Especially with the Homeworld Security Trooper being in the set.
Shock troopers arent only stationed on coruscant
🤣🤣🤣Hilarious. Had this set back in the day.Great set.
Thx for confusing me. I always tought it was umbara and now im creeping out.
😂😂 I was even more confused AFTER I finished making this video than I was before.
i think the set can fit both episodes or there was a missuderstanding when creating the box art or the umbara is just more recognizable or cool looking
Was so good I asked for 2 of them as a teen
i wont be able to sleep for the next 9 days until the true answer reveals itself
i remember getting this set for my birthday
i couldn't figure how build the legs so i gave up
Oh no! 😂😂
An aunt got it for me way back when. One day, I'll get my kid the Z-95.
The model of the at rt is moddeld after umbara the minifigs are just not i think
I remember opening this set just to get Yoda and use it as a Grogu figure because the official one hadn’t released yet.
That’s pretty clever.
I have fond memories of this set. One year for my birthday I had to pick between this and the mandalorian speeder
Thankfully i ended up choosing the speeder and I will always be grateful for my 8 year old self
Both are honestly just such killer sets.
@@crazydog1750 agreed. Not to diss on the AT-RT, but the speeder's got everything going for it
I want to hear you ramble more
😆
I own this set and i know this set is not canon but theres some others that aren't canon and all of them are very good! Like that anakin 2003 starfighter and overall i like this set very much
Bro what are you on about this was my first Lego set
Since droidekas are buildable I think Lego got away with this set more because it did only have one inaccurate minifig (Yoda) the commando droid is technically an accessory like lego skeletons are, like yeah they add to the fig count but they're not proper figures since you do have to partly build them. With minifigs you don't really build them it's just head and legs and that's the fig, everything else you put on it is an accessory.
I'd go with kiros probably didn't spell that name right but yeah. I'd go more with the box art being wrong and Yoda being random.
maybe they should of added a lamppost
🤣😂
I had this set.
I think it is paired with the MHC
I personally really like this set. But it has a few inaccuracies for the set that you didn't cover. The first one is that the actual at-rt is COMPLETELY OVERSIZED, it's not size accurate to the shows and movie AT ALL. The second one is that the clone trooper that is driving the at-rt should be an at-rt driver or a arf trooper, not a regular clone. But anyway, nice video! 👍
Basically every LEGO AT-RT is massively oversized. It’s pretty well discussed and I wanted to focus on the box art so I just ignores it. 😆
I have this set
eh it’s a pretty cool set
I had this set as a kid and never saw the show. I think lego just added 3 extra figures because it looks cool bro not that deep
I like to read into things. 🫠
The answer is yes XD
I would rather have you use more than one example of inaccurate background, also the one you used was about ten years apart, and obviously have different reasons for having inaccurate background.
AT-RTs were used widely throughout the clone wars and there's not one recognizable background for them really, if anything i would argue that this time the background was Umbara because there was already umbaran set released alongside it, so designers most likely wanted to tie them together to create some link between them. That and also to reuse assets.
The BARC speeder released alongside the Umbaran stuff as well, though. 🤔
@@crazydog1750 That is true, but both BARC and AT-RT were easily recognizable by that time, where any umbaran vehicle were frankly quite unique in their looks compared to other Star Wars sets. That combined with the fact that Lego had much more unique sets of their own at that time could pose a risk that average kid who wasn't caught up with TV show, or somehow skipped few Umbara episodes, would get confused as to why that set is counted as Star Wars set. That's why tying it with other, more recognizable SW set on the shelves via more than just logo was important.
It's not to help AT-RT, it was to help umbaran vehicle sell better in case it wasn't memorable enough on its own by tying it together with AT-RT via similar background
@@nihili4196 I see, that makes sense.
CrazyDog 16