New MIRI Commissioning Images from Webb - with Andras Gaspar

SdĂ­let
VloĆŸit
  • čas pƙidĂĄn 17. 05. 2024
  • Head to squarespace.com/launchpadastr... to save 10% off your first purchase of a website or domain using code launchpadastronomy.
    00:00 MIRI's Commissioning Images
    01:51 Andras Gaspar and Team MIRI
    02:34 What is commissioning like with MIRI?
    03:19 What were the first images MIRI took?
    04:22 What is dithering?
    06:05 Squarespace Sponsor Message
    07:17 Cat's Eye Nebula
    09:41 MIRI's Full Field of View
    10:33 NGC 6558 Seyfert Galaxy
    11:53 Looking Near the Galactic Center
    13:37 Thank you, Patrons!
    🔔 Subscribe for more: czcams.com/users/christianread...
    🖖 Share this video with a fellow space traveler: ‱ New MIRI Commissioning...
    🔮 Watch my most recent upload: goo.gl/QbRcE2
    🚀 Help me improve the channel by joining the community on Patreon
    / launchpadastro
    🚀 Check out Launch Pad merchandise!
    teespring.com/stores/launchpa...
    Disclaimer: Some of these links go to one of my websites and some are affiliate links where I'll earn a small commission if you make a purchase at no additional cost to you.
    🧭 References:
    Follow Andras Gaspar on Twitter: / andrasgaspar
    Download Team MIRI's Commissioning Images: github.com/merope82/JWIms
    ✅ Let's connect:
    For business inquiries - chris AT christianready DOT com
    Twitter - @launchpadastro
    Instagram - @launchpadastro
    Facebook - / launchpadastronomy
    Discord - / discord
    📭 c/o Christian Ready
    P.O. Box 66
    Westminster, MD 21158
    United States
    Earth
    ~-~~-~~~-~~-~
    Watch next: Solar Orbiter Discovers Surprising new Phenomenon in the Sun
    ‱ Solar Orbiter Discover...
    ~-~~-~~~-~~-~
  • Věda a technologie

Komentáƙe • 121

  • @dandurkin9735
    @dandurkin9735 Pƙed rokem +43

    Fantastic! Thank you for these "behind the images" insights. Very interesting.

  • @TheSpiritoftheCocktail
    @TheSpiritoftheCocktail Pƙed rokem +28

    CHRISTIAN!!! Thanks for another great video!!! As a novice, I always find it interesting when all of the images are overlaid. So far JWST is working great!! I love these images!!!

  • @earbuds412
    @earbuds412 Pƙed rokem +18

    That was a great talk to listen to! Thank you for bringing it to us. Seems like every image has so much information and a purpose and a story behind it.

  • @ZeroSpawn
    @ZeroSpawn Pƙed rokem +7

    I work with laser scanning microscopes and I have been waiting for this level of detail on this instrumentation.

  • @AnakinSkywalker-mm3gi
    @AnakinSkywalker-mm3gi Pƙed rokem +14

    I hope LUVOIR-A gets built!

    • @randar1969
      @randar1969 Pƙed rokem +1

      amen!

    • @smallpeople172
      @smallpeople172 Pƙed rokem

      Luvoir is entirely cancelled. There is a new study being performed to plan a new telescope system which will seek to find and image exoplanets to find life

    • @Prismer6
      @Prismer6 Pƙed rokem +1

      @@smallpeople172 Source?

  • @rhoddryice5412
    @rhoddryice5412 Pƙed rokem +3

    Fantastic, Thank you Christian. As I have commented before, your coverage of JWST have been stellar. And thanks to Andres for his clear break down of how Miri works. I’ll check out your twitter.

  • @yin-fire3263
    @yin-fire3263 Pƙed rokem +8

    Amazing work with the group! Thanks for bringing such professional firsthand experience to us.

  • @4GibMe
    @4GibMe Pƙed rokem +2

    Bring us all the WEBB images you can Prof. Ready. You have become the YT go-to channel for everything WEBB.
    Saw your interview with Joe Scott, on my Nebula account. Learned allot about you. The two you seemed to be having a good time.
    None the Less, you should consider joining the Nebula team. All the cool kids are joining.
    Looking forward to more of you stuff. Thanks for the time you put into this.

    • @LaunchPadAstronomy
      @LaunchPadAstronomy  Pƙed rokem +1

      Thanks! I don't know very much about Nebula but I'll look into it.

  • @Zeuskabob1
    @Zeuskabob1 Pƙed rokem +8

    This is really incredible. I'm shocked that latent images on MIRI last for as long as 30 minutes if they're not annealed. It's good that it has the Lyot coronagraph! Even with dithering, very bright objects would surely produce artifacts that might be very hard to remove from observations.
    I suppose MIRI is most exciting in its ability to produce detailed images of dark and very distant objects, so any inadequacies in observing very bright objects is forgivable :D

    • @kumasenlac5504
      @kumasenlac5504 Pƙed rokem +3

      Having found these objects with the MIRI imager, the MIRI integral-field spectrometer can then be used to analyse target objects and learn their secrets.

  • @dexio85
    @dexio85 Pƙed rokem +3

    Another great content not avilable anywhere else. Thank you for so much details you publish about JWST.

  • @ericmelton4186
    @ericmelton4186 Pƙed rokem +3

    Very good. I love it when a real scientist becomes a real person. You can just tell how much he loves his job. Thank you !!!!

  • @scottdorfler2551
    @scottdorfler2551 Pƙed rokem +3

    It was great seeing you on Joe's channel!!!

  • @hp127
    @hp127 Pƙed rokem +6

    Fascinating and so good of you to help us all to get this data and the inside information from Andras , You really help us get the enthousiasm for space exploration. Thanks

  • @jshowbie
    @jshowbie Pƙed rokem +8

    Such an incredible insight! What an absolute joy. The annealing process to aid latent imaging is mind blowing. Thank you so much for the content.

  • @mrbrown6421
    @mrbrown6421 Pƙed rokem +3

    Greatly appreciated.
    So many thanks in every way possible!

  • @joedasilva134
    @joedasilva134 Pƙed rokem +3

    Thanks Christian. Your videos r so refreshing n exciting .
    Keep up the good work .

  • @philbydoodle6199
    @philbydoodle6199 Pƙed rokem

    Awesome this is ground breaking-what a time to be alive

  • @Jay-ud4fm
    @Jay-ud4fm Pƙed rokem +4

    Great interview! It would be so nice to get more of this type, they are really interesting!

  • @tripshh
    @tripshh Pƙed rokem +1

    the panchromatic picture panel literally made me gasp aloud.

  • @FuriosoDrummer
    @FuriosoDrummer Pƙed rokem

    Today I learned about Seyfert Galaxies!

  • @LuigiRBedin
    @LuigiRBedin Pƙed rokem

    You're always the best 👌
    Wonderful job you are doing in outreach for jwst
    â€â€â€đŸ‘

  • @thiagotrevisandesouza6895
    @thiagotrevisandesouza6895 Pƙed rokem +1

    Fantastic !

  • @DanielPizarro184
    @DanielPizarro184 Pƙed rokem +1

    amazing interview

  • @psyeseease2649
    @psyeseease2649 Pƙed rokem +1

    This was really nice to see a little insight into backend of the project.

  • @glmchn
    @glmchn Pƙed rokem +2

    Thank you and Andreas 🙏✹

  • @ChrisPattisonCosmo
    @ChrisPattisonCosmo Pƙed rokem +2

    Awesome stuff - thanks for sharing!

  • @christopherscott8822
    @christopherscott8822 Pƙed rokem +1

    Fantastic video

  • @williamevans1176
    @williamevans1176 Pƙed rokem +1

    Great video. Thanks guys.

  • @Doortodoorgeek
    @Doortodoorgeek Pƙed rokem +1

    great job!

  • @TheSpiritoftheCocktail
    @TheSpiritoftheCocktail Pƙed rokem +2

    YESSSSSSSSSSSSSSSS!!! I'm number 4!!!!!

  • @user-ni6pi6ez3o
    @user-ni6pi6ez3o Pƙed rokem +2

    1:22 Gatekeeping :) lol

  • @darylbrown8834
    @darylbrown8834 Pƙed rokem

    1:37' The central star when enlarged and magnified' looks like it has at least 10 visible spikes of material being cast off!

  • @Lil-Jonn
    @Lil-Jonn Pƙed rokem +3

    Luvoir A's proposed launch date is 2039 or later. đŸ€’ I'm not sure if I'll be alive till then 😭
    But hopefully, it gets built 🔭

    • @LaunchPadAstronomy
      @LaunchPadAstronomy  Pƙed rokem +1

      Well, right now I'm just glad we got JWST working :)

    • @Lil-Jonn
      @Lil-Jonn Pƙed rokem +3

      @@LaunchPadAstronomy oh no. I'm totally happy about jwst. No doubt. My worry is the livoir's ability to find alien life (not necessarily the intelligent life) and I'll miss it. Other than that, I'm all for jwst. đŸ”­đŸ„ł

  • @TheGhostPariah
    @TheGhostPariah Pƙed rokem

    James Webb! James Webb! James Webb!! 😎

  • @cavesalamander6308
    @cavesalamander6308 Pƙed rokem +1

    Could you please explain how heating the whole sensor helps to erase traces of the previous image?
    If I'm not mistaken, the sensor is bolometric. To erase old hot spots (from a bright object), you need to wait until they cool down to the temperature of neighboring pixels. If we warm up the entire sensor, we just add a 'thermal pedestal' for all the pixels, but the warmer parts will still be warmer...

    • @andrasgaspar3889
      @andrasgaspar3889 Pƙed rokem +5

      Hi! These are blocked impurity band photon detectors and not radiative heat detectors. How latents are formed are still not 100% understood. Either electron accumulation in the blocking layer or some kind of structural variation causes it. Heating, we know, erases the accumulated electrons. There are experts who know way more about this than I do. IBC detectors have been around for 40 years, but we are still learning about them.

    • @cavesalamander6308
      @cavesalamander6308 Pƙed rokem +1

      @@andrasgaspar3889 Thank you for your reply. Ah, it is array of special photodiodes. OK, it makes this "thermal erasing" more or less understandable: as the temperature rises, more intense thermal generation begins, and the increased current contributes to erasure.
      BTW, in the last century, I worked with a InSb detector (as part of a submillimeter interferometer for plasma diagnostics) for several years. It was quite primitive, just a separate crystal. As far as I remember, at that time it was not even completely clear how detection works in this material. 🙂

  • @stevenwiederholt7000
    @stevenwiederholt7000 Pƙed rokem +1

    9.482 on The Acme MK VI Cool-O-Meter.

  • @justexactlyperfectbrothersband

    Its like when a blind man takes your hand and says 'can't you see?', only instead of a blind man we have Christian!

  • @norcoreanodelsur
    @norcoreanodelsur Pƙed rokem +1

    ty for the video you are the best on this webb, can you make a video about the bigger meteor impact that happened last week, I know you made one like a month ago, but this other impact apparently made some irreversible damage, I am a little bit worried about our expectancy of webb's life.

    • @LaunchPadAstronomy
      @LaunchPadAstronomy  Pƙed rokem +1

      Thank you! The “new” impact was actually the same one I spoke about in my previous video. The only new information was that the analysis was published. There were some tidbits but it came to largely the same conclusions as their preliminary assessment. Still, might be worth a follow up!

  • @ibnulhussaini3791
    @ibnulhussaini3791 Pƙed rokem +2

    How long does it take for MIRI to cool back down to 7K after they've heated it up to 20K?

    • @LaunchPadAstronomy
      @LaunchPadAstronomy  Pƙed rokem +2

      Andras wasn’t sure, but it’s on the order of about 30 minutes. They’re doing this at least once a day when MIRI isn’t otherwise in use.

  • @raghu45
    @raghu45 Pƙed rokem

    Thanks for this focussed program on MIRI, we get to appreciate how the imagining processes work! đŸ‘ŒđŸ»
    At 8:14 & after, Andras says that it takes half an hr for the decay to get over. Further he says, to get it back again the MIRI is "unnealed" by heating it up from -7k to -20k and back again to -7. So, obviously this unnealing takes lass than 30 minutes! Am I correct? I have to be, or else they cud just allow natural decay 😁. It would be nice to know how quickly the unnealing gets done. Thanks.

    • @koharaisevo3666
      @koharaisevo3666 Pƙed rokem +4

      7 K to 20 K, not negative.

    • @raghu45
      @raghu45 Pƙed rokem

      @@koharaisevo3666 I stand corrected! Brain fade đŸ€ŠđŸ»â€â™‚ïž

  • @gavinmccormick6734
    @gavinmccormick6734 Pƙed rokem

    Like when we see those pictures from webb , the colorful pretty ones , is that how it would really look ?

    • @h.dejong2531
      @h.dejong2531 Pƙed rokem

      JWST works in infrared. Our eyes can't see at those frequencies, so we have to translate what JWST sees to visible light. As you can see from the comparisons with Hubble, an object can look very different in IR than in visible light.
      For objects far away, the light is redshifted. Depending on the distance, it's sometimes possible to take images that reverse that redshift: we take images at the wavelengths that correspond to red, green and blue. So for distant galaxies we can sometimes reconstruct what it would look like in visible light.

  • @jamesdougan8789
    @jamesdougan8789 Pƙed rokem

    g`day christian great video and guest ... how much data do they lose with the diffraction spikes (the optical artifacts on bright stars made by the style of the main mirror)can they still look for things around those stars or is that data lost (line of sight behind and/or close to those stars) like in the example of the galaxy you showed (ngc 6558).. in scale the distance obscured by the spikes could cover 100`s of light years ??? can they recover that data ?
    looking forward to more interviews like this as more data gets released. please keep them coming...
    cheers mate
    james D

    • @user-pk9qo1gd6r
      @user-pk9qo1gd6r Pƙed rokem +1

      The spikes can be canceled out in post processing because their shape is predictable: it's not a perfect cleaning but it can recover a lot of lost elements, which aren't that much compared to the rest of the picture to begin with.

    • @LaunchPadAstronomy
      @LaunchPadAstronomy  Pƙed rokem +2

      Glad you liked it! As for diffraction spikes, there’s not a whole lot you can do except reorient the telescope to move the spikes out of their original location. But if you really need to see something close to a bright source you’re gonna use one of the coronagraphs, anyway.

    • @jamesdougan8789
      @jamesdougan8789 Pƙed rokem +2

      @@LaunchPadAstronomy yes of course i forgot JWST was fitted with a chronograph ( face palm slap) it was 5 am here at time of viewing well that my excuse and i am sticking to it lol .. its also a personal taste thing for me with the diffraction spikes and why i have never owned a newtonian telescope i guess i think its a ..its not really there i would prefer to not see it thing
      the JWST images are incredible and i am looking forward to years of discoveries
      cheers mate

  • @SonofTheMorningStar666
    @SonofTheMorningStar666 Pƙed rokem +2

    👍

  • @physicslover1950
    @physicslover1950 Pƙed rokem

    When will JWST image Betelgeuse ?
    Will you please tell us if you have contact with Nasa officials..
    I still don't know how can I send my questions to Nasa Officials.

  • @svOcelot
    @svOcelot Pƙed rokem

    Some of us are mere Engineers, & not space specialists, so even some of the basic terms you use could use more definition, to help our more complete understanding, & therefore our more complete appreciation of your video. For instance:
    What is "flat-field" & why would one want to establish that? I'm a photographer, & that's not a term we use. Is it related to "depth of field" or depth of focus? I'd think that everything would be focused at infinity, so none of that would apply, but then I'm lost as to the correct meaning.
    "Filters" can be used in several different ways, & it would be useful to know how they're being used on JWST, & especially with MIRI.
    Are they letting JUST those wavelengths through?
    Or are they letting everything EXCEPT those wavelengths through?
    And how wide is that filter? What wavelength range(s) does it cover?
    Probably the former, & then those wavelengths get assigned "color(s)" (wavelengths) in the visible spectrum, but still, it would be nice to clarify these sorts of things.
    Thanks!

    • @andrasgaspar3889
      @andrasgaspar3889 Pƙed rokem

      Sorry! You are right, I should have explained some of the definitions a bit more. It is not easy to cover all ground in a short amount of time.
      Flat field is the response of the optical/camera system to an even-lit background. It shows multiple effects, from uneven illumination due to vignetting to even dust speckles on the detectors. During image reduction, we divide by flat-field images. If the field is attenuated by vignetting or partial blocking, this arithmetic brings the illumination back to an even level. Even in high-precision photography, sometimes flat-fielding is performed.
      Filters let light through AT the wavelengths they are quoted at. Wide/medium/narrow wavelength-band size is relative to the central wavelength. You can see the MIRI filters plotted here: jwst-docs.stsci.edu/jwst-mid-infrared-instrument/miri-instrumentation/miri-filters-and-dispersers

    • @kumasenlac5504
      @kumasenlac5504 Pƙed rokem

      Scientists write the wish-list.
      _Mere engineers_ make it happen (if it can).
      Administrators get their name on the result....

  • @prelich01
    @prelich01 Pƙed rokem

    Every Living Celestrial body has a magnetic pole.

  • @paisiranpayez9667
    @paisiranpayez9667 Pƙed rokem

    All those picture so far we see could have been done by processing pictures from Hable Telescope . So far web does not deliver their scientist clames

  • @goldwingerppg5953
    @goldwingerppg5953 Pƙed rokem +2

    What’s a flat field?

    • @LaunchPadAstronomy
      @LaunchPadAstronomy  Pƙed rokem +4

      It’s a measure of each pixel’s sensitivity, as if every pixel were receiving the exact same number of photons at the same time.

    • @goldwingerppg5953
      @goldwingerppg5953 Pƙed rokem +1

      @@LaunchPadAstronomy Thanks for the content and answer, I really appreciate it.

    • @LaunchPadAstronomy
      @LaunchPadAstronomy  Pƙed rokem +1

      Sure! Sorry if that wasn’t clear from the conversation.

    • @goldwingerppg5953
      @goldwingerppg5953 Pƙed rokem

      @@LaunchPadAstronomy It was most likely me getting distracted while it was explained. FYI- all my in-laws are Dead Heads of 50+ years.

    • @LaunchPadAstronomy
      @LaunchPadAstronomy  Pƙed rokem

      You married well.

  • @physicslover1950
    @physicslover1950 Pƙed rokem +1

    Why are the diffraction spikes in the MIRI image so different from those in NIRcam image... The MIRI image spikes looks a lot like Hubble spikes... Moreover in NIRcam Image the stars are solid but in MIRI image the stars are kind of facy and seems like the star has 18 hexagonal headlights as that of 18 hexagonal mirrors of jwst..🎆. Why is this happening? Why the stars are looking so weird and supernatural in MIRI image..? đŸ˜”đŸ˜”

    • @koharaisevo3666
      @koharaisevo3666 Pƙed rokem

      It's cause by the diffraction inside MIRI sensor. czcams.com/video/E-pNS5mDExQ/video.html

    • @TuNguyen-vu1cg
      @TuNguyen-vu1cg Pƙed rokem +3

      I think he explained that in the video after mirror alignment process.

    • @TuNguyen-vu1cg
      @TuNguyen-vu1cg Pƙed rokem

      czcams.com/video/E-pNS5mDExQ/video.html

    • @LaunchPadAstronomy
      @LaunchPadAstronomy  Pƙed rokem +1

      Yep, see czcams.com/video/E-pNS5mDExQ/video.html and jump to the discussion of the MIRI image. Truth is I talked about it with Andras while making this video as well, but I decided to edit that part out for time (the original conversation was nearly an hour!)

    • @andrasgaspar3889
      @andrasgaspar3889 Pƙed rokem +2

      @@LaunchPadAstronomy You have material for another video! 🙂We also talked about the focusing of the instruments during MIMF, which was cut. Commissioning was long!

  • @Kabup2
    @Kabup2 Pƙed rokem

    So now what? They will release 5 or 6 photos every month or so? I was expecting more than that.

    • @LaunchPadAstronomy
      @LaunchPadAstronomy  Pƙed rokem +1

      Researchers are always given a one-year proprietary period so they may analyze their data and publish without fear of getting scooped by someone else. If the work is going out for a NASA press release, the policy is to wait until after it's been vetted by peer review (the Early Release Observations are an obvious exception so they could show the public how the telescope is working).
      Does this mean we're going to wait a whole year to see more images? Nope! Early Release Science observations are up on the MAST archive (see the link in the description). These are science (e.g., non-calibration) observations that waive the proprietary period so the community can look at the same initial dataset and develop follow-up observing programs. All of those datasets are public in the archive, so have at it!

    • @h.dejong2531
      @h.dejong2531 Pƙed rokem +1

      In the 6 months of commissioning, they took about 140,000 images. That's about the output you can expect (maybe a bit less because the average observation will take longer because the targets are fainter than during commissioning). As Christian says there'll be a delay due to the proprietary period for General Observer images.

    • @Kabup2
      @Kabup2 Pƙed rokem

      @@LaunchPadAstronomy I see, it makes sense. The Hubble works in the same frame? If so, I didn't knew that.

    • @Kabup2
      @Kabup2 Pƙed rokem

      @@h.dejong2531 140.000? Ok, I guess we can check it in a year, more or less *sigh*

    • @LaunchPadAstronomy
      @LaunchPadAstronomy  Pƙed rokem +1

      Yes, that policy is going to be true of any publicly-funded observatory, on the ground or in space.

  • @adilelfarissi
    @adilelfarissi Pƙed rokem

    MIRI is a very strange cam, i never processed images like this... but the result of my conversion of the NGC3132 MIRI image let see the gases and dust shape and relief and a crazy optical illusion of 2 human faces in the down right border... nothing interesting in the conversion of the NIRCam... my images are in my flickr and my descrips here...

  • @starry2006
    @starry2006 Pƙed rokem

    Why is it just commissioning images still?

    • @LaunchPadAstronomy
      @LaunchPadAstronomy  Pƙed rokem

      It's not. Early Release Science observations are being made public on the MAST archive (link in the description) so feel free to have at it!

  • @pobinr
    @pobinr Pƙed rokem

    So a couple of weeks after the 1st four images we now just get old calibration images. What's going on with webb now?
    Why no new images for a fortnight?
    Has it been struck by a dinosaur extinction meterorite type event? Lol
    I hope not

    • @LaunchPadAstronomy
      @LaunchPadAstronomy  Pƙed rokem +3

      Head on over to the data archive and you’ll see all of the data just released!

    • @LaunchPadAstronomy
      @LaunchPadAstronomy  Pƙed rokem +2

      Link in the description. Have at it!

    • @TheEvilmooseofdoom
      @TheEvilmooseofdoom Pƙed rokem

      Don't ever expect the get the most recent images. I believe the astronomer's get exclusive access to the data for a certain amount of time before the images go public. It allows them to get their science done and likely published.

    • @LaunchPadAstronomy
      @LaunchPadAstronomy  Pƙed rokem +2

      Generally true for most programs which get a one year embargo period. But what’s being released now are science observations intended to allow the community to analyze and use that to develop follow-up programs.

  • @highpointsights
    @highpointsights Pƙed rokem

    Has anything been seen or detected that as of this moment doesn't have a clearly defined path from the new image to existing theories??? In short, have anything showed up you can't yet explain as to it's genesis or maturation??

    • @LaunchPadAstronomy
      @LaunchPadAstronomy  Pƙed rokem +1

      These images were taken to test the camera’s performance. But now that it’s public, someone can analyze them to look for anything interesting.

  • @highpointsights
    @highpointsights Pƙed rokem +1

    I want you guys to find something you can't as of yet explain!?!?!?! It seems to me that this is an incredibly expensive to just see better images of stuff you already largely understand!!!!!!

    • @LaunchPadAstronomy
      @LaunchPadAstronomy  Pƙed rokem +3

      Like I said, these are calibration images. Understanding the detector’s performance on the ground is one thing, but knowing how it performs in space allows it to be used for science. Patience, grasshopper


    • @Zeuskabob1
      @Zeuskabob1 Pƙed rokem +3

      If you want more about what we're hoping to see that might change our understanding, I'd recommend looking at some of the work of Dr. John Mather, senior project scientist for the JWST. He talks about the capabilities we gain through the use of these deep infrared sensors, specifically we might be able to see galaxies and intergalactic details that are red-shifted outside our observable range on other instruments.

    • @TheEvilmooseofdoom
      @TheEvilmooseofdoom Pƙed rokem +2

      It has just started. As for see stuff they already understand that's a very big over simplification.

    • @TuNguyen-vu1cg
      @TuNguyen-vu1cg Pƙed rokem

      @@Zeuskabob1 where did you see his talks?

  • @ConradPino
    @ConradPino Pƙed rokem

    I unsubscribed due to the mid roll sponsor message.

    • @LaunchPadAstronomy
      @LaunchPadAstronomy  Pƙed rokem +3

      Sorry about that. Gotta pay the bills though.

    • @user-pk9qo1gd6r
      @user-pk9qo1gd6r Pƙed rokem +2

      You must be new to the internet

    • @ConradPino
      @ConradPino Pƙed rokem

      @@user-pk9qo1gd6r No, there are many other channels who choose better. Veritasium is excellent example who briefly thanks sponsor during introduction and delivers substantial sponsor message at the end which I frequently watch to reward good placement.

    • @ConradPino
      @ConradPino Pƙed rokem

      @@LaunchPadAstronomy That my be so but you choose were sponsor message is placed. I value my time and to project that interest it's worthwhile creating consequences.

    • @LaunchPadAstronomy
      @LaunchPadAstronomy  Pƙed rokem +2

      Were it up to me, I’d place it at the end and in some agreements I do just that. But other sponsors have their own requirements as to approximate placement (in this case, in the first half of the video.) So I placed the message as far back as permitted. However, I assure you that your choice of whether or not to fast forward is entire yours and will not affect my channel.

  • @scottdorfler2551
    @scottdorfler2551 Pƙed rokem +1

    JWST is the 🐐!!!!!!!!!!!!
    KNOCK ON đŸȘ”!!!!!!!!!!
    It's not the clarity, it's the amount of data per minute. All the beautiful spectrums in the backgrounds of other targets will keep astronomers busy for decades after Webb stops operating. I hope designs for the next 15 meter infrared variant, 9 meters folded up in a Starship, is already underway.