Video není dostupné.
Omlouváme se.
Pope Benedict XVI, Man of the Second Vatican Council
Vložit
- čas přidán 5. 01. 2023
- Friends, Trace Gallagher and I discussed how Pope Benedict XVI was a man of the Second Vatican Council, par excellence.
---WATCH---
Subscribe to this Channel: bit.ly/31LV1sn
Word on Fire Institute Channel: bit.ly/2voBZMD
Word on Fire en Español Channel: bit.ly/2uFowjl
---WORD ON FIRE---
Word on Fire: www.wordonfire...
Word on Fire Institute: wordonfire.ins...
FREE Daily Gospel Reflections (English or Español): dailycatholicg...
---SOCIAL MEDIA---
Bishop Barron Instagram: bit.ly/2Sn2XgD
Bishop Barron Facebook: bit.ly/2Sltef5
Bishop Barron Twitter: bit.ly/2Hkz6yQ
Word on Fire Instagram: bit.ly/39sGNyZ
Word on Fire Facebook: bit.ly/2HmpPpW
Word on Fire Twitter: bit.ly/2UKO49h
Word on Fire en Español Instagram: bit.ly/38mqofD
Word on Fire en Español Facebook: bit.ly/2SlthaL
Word on Fire en Español Twitter: bit.ly/38n3VPt
---SUPPORT WORD ON FIRE---
Donate: www.wordonfire...
Word on Fire Store: store.wordonfi...
Pray: bit.ly/2vqU7Ft
Thanks for taking this mainstream, Bishop Barron 🙏 Pope Benedict did a great work in his lifetime. The Catechism is beautiful.
For real, though! I grew up Baptist, and the only book we had to definitively explain out faith was the Bible--and look how many different ways the Word of God can be interpreted! To have a document that corroborates and confirms what the Scriptures teach, explaining them clearly for our day and age, is a great blessing. May Pope Emeritus Benedict rest in peace!
No he covered up and dismissed rape murder molestation ect… threw out his time as pope.. wtf is wrong with Catholics following false teachings and serious evil doing.. it’s right in front of your face.. I know I was brought up catholic!!! Do your research and read the Bible.. that simple… sad..
Man made religion!!! Duhhhh
@@JMD0107 No, a culmination of 2000 years of divine revelation concerning Christ. He works through people.
3:23 Pope Benedict XVI, was the first Pope to use Twitter!
The mountain can make its slopes flatter for some to climb better, but the height to climb and the peak do not change.
Thank you
Bishop Barron for Pope!
Thank you Jesus
It's ok to use up-to-day technology and language, but the original message of the Bible must not be distorted.
I remember when the altar got turned around. The council was probably needed, but things have gone too far. GOD BLESS US ALL
NOW it's the Tabernacles being removed & put who knows where? In a room......over there, out of sight.
Show me a bishop who objects to this!!!!! Cowardice & BLATANT hypocrites in action since they're the ones behind it. Meanwhile Bishop Barron & others create a "Eucharistic Revival" at $ $30,000,000.00? Complain that 70% of Catholics don't believe the Eucharist is the precious body & blood of Christ? They're shooting themselves in the foot & are becoming more of a minstrel show than clergymen saving souls. They should be ashamed of themselves.
No more money to these evil actions. I will & have spent mine on PERSECUTED priests & religious orders who are weekly being dismissed & stolen from their parish communities.
Have you read the documents for vatican 2? If not you many find that people are using their private interpretations of it not the truth of it. And pre vatican 2 there were many problems with over reach of power and interpretation as well. It's the human condition. Either way pray.
@@flyingtigers3747 your reading it out of context most of it is politically how the church stands Please read the beginning of dignitatis humanae again. Also what Benedict the xvi said about it. Saying it's fallible isn't a light matter either people have been excommunicated for much less.
@@flyingtigers3747 ok speak to your bishop on that
@Flying Tigers you commented on my comment of another's comment so if any we both are trolls if thats what you wish to say. It is catholic beliefs in vatican 2. If it wasn't for vatican 2 I don't think we would have the foothold in Africa and South America we do. In that part of the world v2 was a complete success. We are less than 100 years into v2 the council of nicaea was considered a failure until 500 ad by about everyone. Maybe you're wrong and the holy spirit is right.
I agree with Marek
Santo Subito!
I have read many of his books and Pope Benedict xvi was a great theologian. His love for Christ was in everything he lived and said. Unfortunately people wanted a copy of Pope John Paul and he wasn’t. Everyone should be loved and appreciated for their own unique identity and Christ within them. I read once that during Pope Benedict xvi ministry, there were more priesthood than other Pope’s
The timing on
I don't know how it happened, but God's grace gave me a blessed Homily from Bishop I have never met. The guy's name is Bishop Ambo. That's cool, though.
I have a personal story about the Holy Spirit regarding the election of Pope Benedict XVI. At that time, I had no idea who Joseph Ratzinger was. God has a funny sense of humor, though. Maybe I will share it with you sometime, Bishop Barron. I found it pretty amazing.
Care to share?
@@tumipare3121 I would be willing to share the experience with Bishop Barron only, who might be able to help me understand the workings of the Holy Spirit, because I still carry questions about that experience with me. I am a nobody-what was God doing? Was my response correct? It wouldn’t be right to discuss it other than privately, with clergy. It was a profound experience though, and one that will stay with me as an endearing experience in a loving relationship with my amazing father.
The "spirit" of Vatican 2 has emptied the pews.
Pope Benedict was for Eucharist on the tongue and kneeling
How do you reconcile that.
The only funeral in history. In which one Pope presided. Entourage funeral over another pope. Now deceased. Is now carried to his open grave. The funeral
The clock struck midnight. At B geo
It was surreal. For sure. Interesting
Vatican 2 sounds like Opus Dei
I am watching the requiem mass for Pope Benedict. The Vatican is allowed to have a beautiful Mass in Latin for Pope Benedict, with Latin chants, incense, et al, but Latin Mass is disallowed for most of the laity. This seems like a contradiction. I understand that the Mass is the Latin version of the Novus Ordoe. But everything is dignified, unlike what seems to be the standard Mass one finds in America.
Is "a man of Vatical II" a compliment or insult?
Yes
High compliment
It’s a compliment if you’ve read the documents and understand them accurately. It’s an insult if you go by the implementation in this country of sed text.
@@SanctusFidelis that is a great take on it, your holiness!
111. Goes t2. 112. It's spiritual. The Lord's clock is different if you will
It was like a gong. To me. Going b
Thank you for pointing out how Pope Benedict cautioned against the progressive desecrations of the mass… though you left out how Benedict restored the Traditional Latin Mass practice while Pope Francis basically banned it once again… a directly divisive attack on the growing faithful and devout Catholic community within the Church.
Bishop Barron is uneasy about the TLM
@Brian Delaney and honestly, I do not know why. It is like a beef salesman who is confused and troubled and can't understand why people keep asking for prime rib.
@@SuperPunitor well said!
Bishop Barron doesn't talk about the TLM because the whole thing has become way to political, both due to Pope Francis but also due to the Radtrads. I think it's better if Bishop Robert Barron doesn't get involved in that debate and rather continues to convert people to Catholicism.
yay MSM.
Gallagher still throwing curveballs. His Excellency is a very good batter.
Ratzinger played his part in allowing children to be sexually abused when he could've stopped it, the churches reputation is more important than ruining kids lives
@@bethmcmullan7686 read the report involving a priest called Peter Hellermann, kids were sexual abused because of ratzinger
Bless us all .he died! . It's a horserace now
Kinda=×√∆. Dec 31 4:31 am. 2022
It was not a sad Day. For some reason. Benedicts funeral. B
Who else just like wishes that Vatican II never happened?
The world probably would be much better today.
Why?? The documents of Vatican II are the most Patristic and Christ centred writings the Church has produced in the past 1000 years!
Not me! I thank God that his Holy Spirit inspired another magisterially approved Ecumenical Council!
@@curiouschris98 Amen! I wonder how many have actually read Vatican II?
If it's an ecumenical council, then it's infallible, and I don't have any reason to believe it wasn't an ecumenical council, therefore I believe that what was put forward at that council is infallible.
Did various individuals and groups misinterpret what was put forward and participate in detrimental practices? Perhaps. But I won't fault the council for that--the world, the flesh, and the devil can twist many things towards the fall of the human person.
Bring back the Host on the tongue, I will be there. I feel that by receiving in the hand, is a sin!!!
Feelings don’t determine whether a thing is a sin or not. The Church allows it, and if done reverently is not at all sinful. If you prefer to receive on the tongue then God bless you. That’s my preferred way, too. But if I’m going to a Church where the only way I’m allowed to receive is on the hand then I’m not going to refuse communion based on my own personal hangups.
I can't speak to your experience, but in my region, I am permitted to receive on the tongue--even in 2020, it was discouraged but not banned as far as I can recall. Wasn't there a bit in the epistle to the Romans about not causing a brother to stumble? I'd prefer to permit what the Holy Church permits, while still doing what I believe to be most fitting.
Translation: “I trust my own personal feelings more than the magisterium, would rather debate the manner of receiving the eucharist than receiving christ himself and would rather complain about covid and Vatican II than to fulfill my Sunday Obligation”
And taking bread, he gave thanks and broke it and gave it to them, saying: “This is my body, which is given for you. Do this as a commemoration of me.”
@@ericfrom8508 Perhaps I should have said Cannon Law.
His brother was right, it was a mistake for him to be elected Pope, he was about the worst pastor in that position in anyone's lifetime.
@@bethmcmullan7686 He specifically stated that he thought there should be fewer Catholics, the ones who disagreed with him going, not the many thugs and gangsters and right-wing yes-men he appointed and promoted. He convinced me that it's a mistake to have an academic theologian as pope as JPII convinced me it's a mistake to have one who had a background in theater.
@@bethmcmullan7686 You deny it and then you make it the basis of your understanding. His brother was right, his papacy was a disaster, his appointees with few exceptions are rather dreadful and anti-pastoral "bishops".
@@bethmcmullan7686 I didn't make him say it. He was a disaster, a parish closer, a pathological clericalist.
@@bethmcmullan7686 More important than what he said is what he did and what he didn't do. He made the right decision to resign, his election was a monumental mistake. He should have stayed an academic theologian. His time as JPII's enforcer was worse than his misguided papacy.
@@bethmcmullan7686 I lived through the papacies of JPII and Benedict XVI and through those of the previous four Popes (the last few years of Pius XII) and of Good Pope Francis. I said "Good Pope" not because I agree with Francis on everything just as I don't condemn Benedict on everything he did though he was the worst pastor as Pope of any of those, including Pius XII and even the quite bad JPII. I will point out that JPII's behavior in regard to St.Oscar Romero and the myriads of Central American martyrs was severely immoral, and then there was his response to the priest sexual criminals crisis. If you want me to stipulate that perhaps JPII was as bad a pastor as Benedict, I would say that was within the realm of possibility.
Your Excellency,
Why do you and so many others in this community condemn me for simply wanting to live in a community of people who look like me?
Bro-
Because you're racist, and that's against the bible
Because it's a sin. IDK, just guessing
@@zr3755 how is that a sin?
@@geneticsmatter3834 We all have a common ancestor, Adam, so we are all part of the same human family. Ergo, racism is a sin
Your Excellency,
Why do you and so many others in this community use Galatians 3:28 to justify 'diversity', when it also says "neither male nor female"?
When have I ever used that text to justify "diversity?!"
@@BishopBarron Do you admit using that text to justify mass migration is fallacious? Because it could also be used to justify seeing “neither male nor female”?
@@geneticsmatter3834 mass migration ?
Because women aren't inferior to men, but all equal in the eyes of God, so are different ethnicities. Repent
@@geneticsmatter3834 Who exactly does that?