How Did Catholicism Start?
Vložit
- čas přidán 27. 06. 2022
- Join the Captivating History Book Club: bit.ly/3TMmpU2
Get a FREE mythology bundle ebook covering Greek, Norse, and Egyptian mythology here:
www.captivatinghistory.com/ebook
You can get the audiobook version of Catholic History here:
www.amazon.com/Catholic-Histo...
You can get the paperback version of Catholic History here:
www.amazon.com/Catholic-Histo...
And the ebook version of Catholic History here:
www.amazon.com/Catholic-Histo...
The Catholic Church has a history that spans over two thousand years, and it began with none other than Jesus Christ himself. At least, that is what modern popes believe. But at first, there was just one church, and there was no division between Catholics, Protestants, Eastern Orthodox, and other branches of Christianity. Christians all over the known world were united, and together, they made their spirituality bloom. Their religion took over the lives of villagers, nobles, kings, queens, and even newly-arrived pagan armies that came to conquer Europe.
See all captivating history books here:
www.amazon.com/author/captiva...
Follow us on Facebook: / captivatinghistory
Follow us on Twitter: @CaptivHistory
Just toured Spain ,Italy and eastern Orthodox countries , then Israel , Jerusalem and Bethlehem - been to most of the historic areas Jesus walked and was born and crucified ....continuing my studies of religion and history . thank you!
Next go to the sites of the first seven original churches in western Anatolia.
READ ! Timothy ch.4 ,v.1-3 ............"TEACHINGS OF DEMONS "....... & "forbidding TO MARRY ", read , MATHEW CH.23. V 9 Do not call ANYONE on earth FATHER. !!
According to the Holy Quran, Jesus didn't claim that he was the son of Allah(God) But He said...
Zuhruf 64
I seek refugee in Allah from the Satan.
In the name of Allah ,Rahman ,Rahim
"Allah is my Lord and your Lord. So worship Him. This is a straight path."
-----------------
And on the resurrection day Allah will ask Jesus about the Christian faith.
Quran - Maaide 116-118
And [beware the Day] when Allah will say, "O Jesus, Son of Mary, did you say to the people, 'Take me and my mother as deities (gods) besides Allah?'" He will say, "Exalted are You! It was not for me to say that to which I have no right. If I had said it, You would have known it. You know what is within myself, and I do not know what is within Yourself. Indeed, it is You who is Knower of the unseen.
I said not to them except what You commanded me - to worship Allah, my Lord and your Lord. And I was a witness over them as long as I was among them; but when You took me up, You were the Observer over them, and You are, over all things, Witness.
If You should punish them - indeed they are Your servants; but if You forgive them - indeed it is You who is the Exalted in Might, the Wise.
----------------
If you love Jesus, accept him as a Messenger not as the God and not as the son of Allah. If you are follower of Jesus, believe in Messenger Muhammad, too. Because that's what he really wants you to do. And he heralded the coming of Messenger Muhammed. Jesus said to his people this👇👇👇
Quran -Saff -6
And [mention] when Jesus, the son of Mary, said, "O children of Israel, indeed I am the messenger of Allah to you confirming what came before me of the Torah and bringing good tidings of a messenger to come after me, whose name is Ahmad." But when he came to them with clear evidences, they said, "This is obvious magic."
Quran -Women 171
O People of the Scripture, do not commit excess in your religion or say about Allah except the truth. The Messiah, Jesus, the son of Mary, was but a messenger of Allah and His word which He directed to Mary and a soul [created at a command] from Him. So believe in Allah and His messengers. And do not say, "Three"; desist - it is better for you. Indeed, Allah is but one God. Exalted is He above having a son. To Him belongs whatever is in the heavens and whatever is on the earth. And sufficient is Allah as Disposer of affairs.
----------------------------
I invite you to be a Muslim. Latest, last and only valid religion in the Hereafter. First step is to say "I witness that there is no god but ALLAH, and i witness that Mohammad is Messenger of Allah" and believe in this. Islam is a monotheistic religion. Allah doesn't accept the existence of false deities and He orders humanity to believe in only one God, Him. He explains why it is impossible the existence of gods other than Him in Holy Quran in chapter Isra which means The Night Journey and in chapter Enbiya which means Prophets.
Quran-Isra-43
Say, [O Muhammad], "If there had been with Him [other] gods, as they say, then they [each] would have sought to the Owner of the Throne a way."
Exalted is He and high above what they say by great sublimity.
The seven heavens and the earth and whatever is in them exalt Him. And there is not a thing except that it exalts [Allah] by His praise, but you do not understand their [way of] exalting. Indeed, He is ever Forbearing and Forgiving.
Quran-Prophets-22
Had there been within the heavens and earth gods besides ALLAH, they both would have been ruined. So exalted is Allah, Lord of the Throne, above what they describe.
--------------------
Six Pillars of Faith in Islam
1-To believe in Omnipotent Allah (GOD) (without ascribing partners to Him. Without saying "He has a son." Without saying "He has a helper out of weakness")
2-Angels (Without giving them woman names. Without saying "They are daughters of Allah")
3-All Holy Scriptures (Books revealed by Allah)
4-All Messengers (accepting them as human beings not gods or sons of God)
5-Judgement Day (Resurrection Day)
6-Destiny
Five Pillars of Islam
1- SHAHADA
To say "I witness that there is no god save Allah, and i witness that Muhammad is His Messenger."
2- SALAT
To perform prayer 5 times a day.
3- SAWM
Fasting in the month Ramadan according to lunar calendar. (29-30 days)
4- ZAKAT
If you are rich you give alms to poor people.
5- HAJJ
To make the pilgrimage to Mecca, Kaba if you can afford. You become a pilgrim after this visit.
Allah is satan. Islam was invented by satan to try undermine the one and only true God and Jesus.
Please read. Exodus 20 1-5
The existence of allah and mohumad is a blasphemy to the Lord God of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob. Jesus says NOBODY comes to the Father EXCEPT through ME! The only way to salvation is through repentance of your sins and belief that the Lord Jesus Christ Yeshua died on the cross for our sins and iniquity and was raised back to life on the third day (as witnessed by hundreds) your salvation is not by works or how many times a day you pray but through the blood of Christ JESUS who died for YOU and me. I will pray for you brother. You must repent, reject Islam and follow JESUS, the son of David and Abraham!
I'll see you as a Muslim soon
“You are Peter and upon this rock I will build my church”
Jesus was referring to Peter’s confession as the foundation not Peter the man.
@@corsairman1956 Among all the other disciples Peter recognises Jesus as the messiah
@@corsairman1956 Then why did Jesus give Peter the authority to bind and loosen?
@@corsairman1956 So you're making a specific interpretation, which differs from the Church. By what authority do you make this interpretation? Are you infallible? How do you know you're right? If God gave us His inerrant word, wouldn't He have also left an inerrant interpreter, so that we wouldn't fall into arguments (like they kind you're making)?
@@kdmdlo Hi, what ‘Church’ are you referring to?
I think your reference of Jesus travelling through Palestine is not historically accurate. Jesus traveled through Judea, also known as the land of Canaan. The people in this area called Philistines originated as an immigrant group from the Aegean (Greece) that settled in Canaan.
The land was renamed in 132-136 CE, by the Roman emperor Hadrian to Syria-Palaestina, the Jews traditional enemies, as punishment for the Jews insurrection at that time.
There are lots of inaccuracies in this video; subtle but important. The first clue to anyone paying attention is the use of Common Era (CE) and BCE instead of AD and BC. Christians would never do that.
Any modern scholar uses CE and BCE.
@@nbenefiel And for what reason should they stop calling the presocratics - the philosophers before Socrates - by the name of presocratics? Catholics will so easily follow after the communists. It is a marriage made in heaven.
Any modem woke scholar@@nbenefiel
@David19746 Why? Most of us don't feel it is normal driving from orgy too orgy hopping from bed to bed from filthy harlot to filthy harlots. That's why. We shouldn't just change things just because a radical pointy headed professor thinks we should.
@@WilliamJones-sf5pt The early Christians lived communally and shared their incomes. We haven’t done that since the fourth century.
Studying the history of the Orthodox Christians is a worthwhile exercise for people interested in Christian history. We in the West tend to ignore this side of Christianity, but that's a mistake if we're really interested in origins of our faith.
Absolutely agree the reason the early heresies were in the East is that’s where most of the battles over beliefs was waged Rome was pretty much a backwater in comparison to Constantinople
@@sewwhat6525 En Occidente es muy antiarrianismo por la herejía que duró más en el reino visigodo y lombardo.
Yeah I've been having these thoughts, mostly for conversion reasons. Unbelievers will throw this stuff at you all day but also it really is quite interesting. For example as you state as much as I disagree with Catholic doctrine(s) I cannot discount the fact that I wouldn't know anything about Christ if the CC were not is it was in terms of dominance. It's where I step back and just trust that God knows what he is doing.
@@greglongmore6503 So you disagree with the Catholic teachings, do you? Hmm, so what is it ? You disagree with is it about divorce perhaps? Jesus was really clear about that! Matthew 19: 9 Now I say this to you: anyone who divorces his wife -- I am not speaking of an illicit marriage -- and marries another, is guilty of adultery.'
@@greglongmore6503 About Idolatry
Exodus 20:4 You shall not make yourself a carved image or any likeness of anything in heaven above or on earth beneath or in the waters.
The Lord did not prohibit statues; he prohibited worshiping them. God actually commanded the making of images. Just five chapters later, God commanded Moses to build the Ark of the Covenant, which would contain the presence of God and was to be venerated as the holiest place in all of Israel. Here is what God commanded Moses concerning the statues on it:
And you shall make two cherubim of gold; of hammered work shall you make them, on the two ends of the mercy seat. Make one cherub on the one end, and one cherub on the other end; of one piece with the mercy seat shall you make the cherubim on its two ends (Ex. 25:18-19).
In Numbers 21:8-9, not only did our Lord order Moses to make another statue in the form of a bronze serpent, but he commanded the children of Israel to look at it in order to be healed. The context of the passage is one where Israel had rebelled against God, and a plague of deadly snakes was sent as a just punishment. This statue of a snake had no power of itself-we know from John 3:14 that it was merely a type of Christ-but God used this image of a snake as an instrument to effect healing in his people.
Further, in 1 Kings 6, Solomon built a temple for the glory of God, described as follows:
In the inner sanctuary he made two cherubim of olivewood, each ten cubits high. . . . He put the cherubim in the innermost part of the house. . . . He carved all the walls of the house round about with carved figures of cherubim and palm trees, and open flowers, in the inner and outer rooms. . . . For the entrance to the inner sanctuary he made doors of olivewood. . . . He covered the two doors of olivewood with carvings of cherubim, palm trees, and open flowers; he overlaid them with gold (1 Kgs. 6:23, 27, 29, 31, 32).
King Solomon ordered the construction of multiple images of things both “in heaven above” (angels) and “in the earth beneath” (palm trees and open flowers). After the completion of the temple, God declared he was pleased with its construction (1 Kgs. 9:3).
It becomes apparent, given the above evidence, that a strictly literal interpretation of Exodus 20:2-5 is erroneous. Otherwise, we would have to conclude that God prohibits something in Exodus 20 and elsewhere commands the very same thing.
Why would God use these images of serpents, angels, palm trees, and open flowers? Why didn’t he heal the people directly rather than use a “graven image”? Why didn’t he command Moses and Solomon to build an ark and a temple without any images at all?
First, God knows what his own commandments mean. He never condemned the use of statues absolutely. Second, God created man as a being who is both spiritual and physical. To draw us to himself, God uses both spiritual and physical means. He will use statues, the temple, or even creation itself to guide us to our heavenly home.
Psalm 19:1 tells us: “The heavens are telling the glory of God; and the firmament proclaims his handiwork.” Romans 1:20 says: “Ever since the creation of the world his invisible nature, namely, his eternal power and deity, has been clearly perceived in the things that have been made.” Gazing at a sunset-or a great painting of a sunset-and contemplating the greatness of God through the beauty of his creation is not idolatry. Nor is it idolatrous to look at statues of great saints of old and honor them for the great things God has done through them. It is no more idolatrous for us to desire to imitate their holy lives and honor them than it was for Paul to exhort the Corinthians to imitate his own holy life (1 Cor. 4:16) and to “esteem very highly” those who were “over [the Thessalonians] in the Lord and admonish [them]” (1 Thess. 5:12-13).
Having statues honoring God or great saints brings to mind. For Catholics, having statues is just as natural as-having pictures in our wallets to remind us of the ones we love here on earth. But reminding ourselves of loved ones is a far cry from idolatry.
"The authors of the Gospels never claimed to know the life of the Messiah?" Matthew was a disciple of Jesus. John was also the beloved disciple of Jesus.
Jesus Christ is the Truth.
@@apollo8352 God help you🙏
@@apollo8352 This is the disciple who is testifying to these things and wrote these things, and we know that his testimony is true.
- John 21:24
@@apollo8352 That's impossible because God will judge the sexually immoral. Jesus Christ is sinless.
@@ericsower7022 Hi there.... so what a technical discrepancy! I will tell you what, it is claimed to be the word of god and without error....for if it had errors then god would be fallible which is kind of a big thing in religion.
The point I hope you see is because of 'a technical error' or blatant lies you really cannot trust Paul's scriptures to be reliable testimony.
You of course know Paul did not have his claimed conversion until some time after 36AD, while the Jesus guy died in 30 or 33AD, depending on who is counting...So Paul never actually meet Jesus before his death, nor did Paul witness any of the biblical claims which is another big deal considering his scriptures make most of the main bible claims! Remember Galatians 1:11-16 Paul's scriptures contain no eye witness accounts, no information from any other person and no information from any other source, that is if you can believe Paul!
See were this is going?
Actually,
Paul was highly educated
Luke was a physician (not a sinner from the street or poor man)
Matthew was a definitely educated and wealthy man working in “irs” so to speak
It’s videos like this that really magnify the importance of knowing and reading the Word of God for yourself…
Mathew
17 Jesus replied, “Blessed are you, Simon son of Jonah, for this was not revealed to you by flesh and blood, but by my Father in heaven. 18 And I tell you that you are Peter,[a] and on this rock I will build my church, and the gates of Hades[b] will not overcome it. 19 I will give you the keys of the kingdom of heaven; whatever you bind on earth will be[c] bound in heaven, and whatever you loose on earth will be[d] loosed in heaven
Rock/peter/cepha
There are so many things wrong in this video!
MATTHEW CHAPTER 16: VERSE 18.ARE 3 PARTS
#1. THE CHANGING NAME OF SIMON BAR-JONAH > SIMON CEPHAS [ JOHN CHAPTER 1: VERSE 41- 42.]
#2. THE ANOUCEMENT OF THE FOUNDATION OF OUR FAITH.
THE DEATH OF THE SACRIFICE
#3. THE TRIUMPHANT VICTORY AGAINST HELL AND THE GLORIOUS LIFE.
IN VERSE 21. REPEATING VERSE 18.#1. THE FOUNDATION OF OUR FAITH
#2. 2ND THE DEATH OF THE SACRIFICE
#3. THE TRIUMPHANT RESURRECTION
THESE WAS CONFIRMED AND ATTESTED BY APOSTLE PAUL IN 1ST CORINTHIANS CHAPTER 15: ACCORDING TO THE SCRIPTURES [ PLURAL SCRIPTURES FROM THE OLD TESTAMENT 1. GENESIS CHAPTER 3: VERSE 15. THE BIRTH OF THE HOLY SEED SACRIFICE.
THE DEATH OF THE SACRIFICE LAMB < GENESIS CHAPTER 3: VERSE 21.
THE TRIUMPHANT VICTORY OF LIFE < GENESIS CHAPTER 3: VERSE 24.
ISAIAH CHAPTER 6: VERSE 13.THE HOLY SEED
ISAIAH CHAPTER 7: VERSE 14
ISAIAH CHAPTER 8: VERSE 14- VERSE 16
ISAIAH CHAPTER 9: VERSE 6
ISAIAH CHAPTER 40: VERSE 3,VERSE 23.
ISAIAH CHAPTER 42: VERSE 1,VERSE 6,VERSE 11
ISAIAH CHAPTER 43: VERSE 10,VERSE 15
ISAIAH CHAPTER 44: VERSE 6,VERSE 8
ISAIAH 45: VERSE 15
ISAIAH CHAPTER 53: VERSE 10, VERSE 15
LUKE CHAPTER 1: VERSE 35.THE HOLY SEED
MATTHEW CHAPTER 1: VERSE 18 THE HOLY SEED
LUKE CHAPTER 2: VERSE 32
MATTHEW CHAPTER 12: VERSE 21.[ ACCORDING TO THE SCRIPTURES ISAIAH CHAPTER 42: VERSE 1, VERSE 6,VERSE 11. THE GENTILES PEOPLE ARE INCLUDING IN THE PLAN OF REDEMPTION AND SALVATION> MALACHI CHAPTER 1: VERSE 1,VERSE 6,VERSE 11.> ACTS CHAPTER 9: VERSE 5,VERSE 15,VERSE 17-18. < JOHN CHAPTER 10: VERSE 16.LETTER B.,JOHN CHAPTER 15: VERSE 20.,JOHN CHAPTER 17: VERSE 20., JOHN CHAPTER 20: VERSE 21.I.N.G, VERSE 29.LETTER B. THE GENTILES PEOPLE ARE INCLUDING IN THE REDEMPTION AND SALVATION. )
ACCORDING TO THE SCRIPTURES < JOHN CHAPTER 1: VERSE 1,VERSE 6,VERSE 14,VERSE 18,VERSE 29,VERSE 33,VERSE 36. THE 1ST APPEARANCE OF GOD THROUGH THE HOLY SEED , IN THE NEW TESTAMENT
#2. 2ND APPEARANCE OF GOD THROUGH THE GLORIFIED BODY
ACCORDING TO THE SCRIPTURES < ISAIAH CHAPTER 28: VERSE 16,VERSE 19. JOHN CHAPTER 2: VERSE 19,VERSE 21,VERSE 22. MATTHEW CHAPTER 10: VERSE 23., JOHN CHAPTER 14: VERSE 3., MATTHEW CHAPTER 28: MARK CHAPTER 26: LUKE CHAPTER 24: JOHN CHAPTER 20: THE 2ND APPEARANCE OF GOD THROUGH THE GLORIFIED BODY
#3. THE 3RD APPEARING OF GOD SHALL BE IN THE 3RD COMING OF GOD> LUKE CHAPTER 17: VERSE 37
LUKE CHAPTER 18: VERSE 8
LUKE CHAPTER 19: VERSE 27. NO LONGER AS LAMB, NO LONGER AS PRIEST, NO LONGER AS PRINCE, BUT LORD OF lords, KING OF kings, GOD OF gods < JOSHUA CHAPTER 22: VERSE 22., JEREMIAH CHAPTER 10: VERSE 10. 2ND THESALONIANS CHAPTER 1: VERSE 8. ISAIAH CHAPTER 24: VERSE 23., MATTHEW CHAPTER 24: VERSE 28,VERSE 30,VERSE 32. REVELATIONS CHAPTER 1: VERSE 7-8, VERSE 17-18., ACTS CHAPTER 1: VERSE 10- 12., AMOS CHAPTER 4: VERSE 12- 13., AMOS CHAPTER 8: VERSE 9.THE LORD GOD ALL MIGHTY. 🙏
HE SHALL COME AND REIGN IN MOUNT OF OLIVES 🫒 MATTHEW CHAPTER 28: VERSE 16., ACTS CHAPTER 1: VERSE 10- 12., ISAIAH CHAPTER 24: VERSE 23.LETTER C. IN MOUNT ZION, IN JERUSALEM, IN ISRAEL 🇮🇱, NOT SOMEWHERE ELSE IN THE PARTS OF THE EARTH/ GLOBE/ WORLD. TO REIGN 1,000 YEARS OF PEACE AND PROSPERITY. GOD BLESS US ALL 🇺🇸 🌎 🇺🇲
LIKE IN THE OLD TESTAMENT GOD APPEARED TO PROPHET ABRAHAM 3XTIMES IN DIFFERENT WAYS [ NOT SIMULTANEOUSLY, BUT IN DIFFERENT TIMES OF SITUATIONS]
#1. 1ST APPEARANCE TO ABRAHAM GENESIS CHAPTER 14: VERSE 18. IN PRIESTHOOD APPEARANCE
#2. 2ND APPEARANCE TO ABRAHAM GENESIS CHAPTER 18: VERSE 2,VERSE 20. IN ANGELIC JUDGE APPEARANCE
IN GENESIS CHAPTER 18: VERSE 14. HE PROMISE TO ABRAHAM AND SARAH TO COMING BACK AGAIN.
#3. 3RD APPEARANCE TO ABRAHAM IN GENESIS CHAPTER 21: VERSE 1. IN LIFE APPEARANCE. THE SAME IN THE NEW TESTAMENT 3XTIMES APPEARANCE
#1. 1ST APPEARANCE JOHN CHAPTER 1:VERSE 6,VERSE 14,VERSE 28,VERSE 29,VERSE 33,VERSE 36. AS SACRIFICE LAMB APPEARANCE
#2. 2ND APPEARANCE JOHN CHAPTER 2: VERSE 19, VERSE 21,VERSE 22., MATTHEW CHAPTER 10:: VERSE 23., JOHN CHAPTER 14: VERSE 3., MATTHEW CHAPTER 28: MARK CHAPTER 16: LUKE CHAPTER 24: JOHN CHAPTER 20: AS GLORIFIED BODY [ OF THE HOLY SEED < JOHN CHAPTER 12: VERSE 24., JOHN CHAPTER 12: VERSE 28., JOHN CHAPTER 13:: VERSE 31- VERSE 32., JOHN CHAPTER 14: VERSE 22., JUDAS CHAPTER 1: VERSE 3, VERSE 9,VERSE 20.THE MOST HOLY FAITH.
#3. 3RD APPEARING SHALL BE IN THE 3RD COMING LUKE CHAPTER 17: VERSE 37
LUKE CHAPTER 18: VERSE 8
LUKE CHAPTER 19: VERSE 27
LUKE CHAPTER 21: VERSE 25- 26
MATTHEW CHAPTER 24: VERSE 28,VERSE 30,VERSE 32.
MATTHEW CHAPTER 25:
REVELATIONS CHAPTER 1: VERSE 7-8, VERSE 17-18, REVELATIONS CHAPTER 19:
ISAIAH CHAPTER 24 VERSE 23.
AMOS CHAPTER 4: VERSE 12- 13., AMOS CHAPTER 8: VERSE 9.
DANIEL CHAPTER 7: VERSE 9,VERSE 13. IN GLORIOUS ANCIENTS DAYS,
ISAIAH CHAPTER 24: VERSE 23. IN ANCIENTS GLORIOUSLY REIGN.
GOD BLESS US ALL 🇺🇸 🌎 🇺🇲
fairytales
In the face of adversity, you found strength, redemption, and a new purpose in life. 🙏💪 It's truly remarkable to see how your life has been turned around.
In the face of common sense you believe a fairytale
2:43 Already had a reputation as a political and religious agitator, especially among the Romans. Where do they get this? Mk.15:10 indicates that Pilate knew that it was from envy that the religious leaders delivered him up, and all 4 Gospels have Pilate wanting to release him because didn't find cause for saying he was a political agitator. So the Romans knew that his agitation was religious but not political. He said "Render unto Caesar what is Caesar's and to what is God's
My thought as well. Good catch
Its good place to send your son whos caught masterbating to gay porn.he will fit right in.
EXACTLY. I was just going to say this… In fact, the Romans didn’t care at all about Jesus when he was preaching
👏🏼 right on however the Romans feared the rising of Jesus’s followers because they were willing to die for the faith so in order to control the people they created the Catholic church in order to embrace the christian’s & have the control- there’s many documentary’s about this, & it makes sense - the catholic church doesn’t even follow Jesus’s teachings
why? because they truly didn’t know the truth & the way which is Jesus! they worship Mary not Jesus
I did a double take on that too. Christ was no politician, or governmental political agitator, at all, though he did get under the skin of the Pharisees and Sadducees, quite often, which was a good thing, but it got him crucified. I still picture those Jewish religious leaders saying to each other, "We got him. No more trouble from him."
Thank you for sharing
The Concrete Confessional blog, whose author was raised Roman Catholic, just dropped an article called "Why This Atheist Is Headed Back to Church." Very interesting reading no matter which side of the fence you're on.
One thing you miss is that "catholic" is a Greek word for universal. So the second century writing was not about a "cathoilc" church but a universal church for all people.
As a 21st century Catholic I still see our Church as a universal church for all people.
Count me out. I threw that monkey off my back six decades ago.
@@maxwelldownham235 good for you never worship false idols
It was "universal" in its conception by Constantine, who incorporated much paganism into his version of Christianity in order to appeal to as many people as possible, including the pagans. All those apostasies remain today. And the pope fully intends to force Romanism upon the world again, complete with compulsory Sunday laws just like in the dark ages.
@@ff6605 Catholics worship Jesus. Contrary to popular belief, the “praying to Mary” is not worship but rather intercession. “Hail Mary full of grace… pray for us sinners.” They ask Mary to pray for them. They would never do that when praying to Jesus because that’s who they are worshiping and asking for help, forgiveness, blessing etc.
@@ff6605 you don't worship the apostles, protestantismn isn't true Christianity
Born again, or to experience the new birth, is a phrase, particularly in evangelicalism, that refers to a "spiritual rebirth", or a regeneration of the human spirit. In contrast to one's physical birth, being "born again" is distinctly and separately caused by the operation of the Holy Spirit. John 3:3
Yet Jesus explained being born again is by baptism, thus naming water and the spirit. Not some made up self pronouncement.
@@dan_m7774 The point, one can't see the kingdom of God, much less, enter into it. John 3:3 is something He does, and it's not accomplished by man, human effort.
Nicodemus thought it was re-entering the womb.
He had a carnal understanding on the nature of the kingdom.
It doesn't come with observation.
And, no one's soul salvation hinges on a piece of real estate on a piece of dirt in the middle east.
2 Corinthians 5:16; John 4:21
Explained well....
@@georgebentonjr3876 Baptism is a grace from God, through Spirit and Water. The heavenly reality came into flesh through Christ. It seems you have a misunderstanding that the material world can not be of God. Baptism of Water and Spirit does save you, because God is not limited only to the invisible.
@@dan_m7774 ""Baptism is a grace from God, through Spirit and Water. The heavenly reality came into flesh through Christ. It seems you have a misunderstanding that the material world can not be of God. Baptism of Water and Spirit does save you, because God is not limited only to the invisible."" end quote.
One of the reasons that Christ was a stone of stumbling and a rock of offense was because He was proclaiming a spiritual kingdom:
My kingdom is not of this world - John 18:36; the kingdom of God is within you - Luke 17:20-21.
Clearly, the majority of the Jews missed their Messiah because they were looking for a physical kingdom.
The disciples too, were looking for a physical kingdom, prior to Pentecost, they held that expectation and view.
After Pentecost, when they received the Holy Spirit, Who led them "into all truth" and taught them of the "things to come," their understanding of the nature of the kingdom was enlightened, and they no longer taught of a physical kingdom. Rather, they applied spiritual interpretations to Old Testament prophecies, used them to describe the Church, and associated the kingdom with the gospel.
The veil of Moses had been removed.
I had about two minutes. The narrator says that Jesus chose 70 Gentiles, that’s not accurate and so it makes me doubt the accuracy of rest of this video. Gentiles we’re not brought in until Paul’s ministry.
Lies again? Cup Series USD SGD
I loved your closing statement brother. Grace & peace to you ❤
ㅁㄷㅅ: ?? 기이한
@@SoyebAkhtar151If Jesus were a prophet, a true prophet speaks truth for God. See Mosaic Law of the prophet. Jesus said He would rise from the dead three days and nights after His death. If His prophesy is true, then His Resurrection makes Him to be God for no one, but God can raise Himself from the dead. Either He told the truth or He did not. If He did not speak the truth, why then would Muhammed call Him a great prophet?
Absolutely interesting info ✝️
Thank you for the video here in New York City watching 2023 8:23 a.m. Wednesday March 22
Here in New York City watching 2023 9:21 p.m. Thursday September 21
@@nadiaestrella2153 LMFAO🤣 thank you for reading my comment here in New York City reading yours Friday September 22nd 1:16 p.m. drinking coffee and walking on 14th Street Union Square heading for the train station to disappear LOL🤣
@@timeisapathwalkingtounderstandI’m watching the video and reading you comment here in Luxembourg, Europe at 1:50am Thursday March 7th needing to get some sleep but chuckling reading your comments. Much love ❤
BTW your narrator has a great voice ..... i do the same work, but his voice totally works for your narrative! Good job
Pretty sure it's not a human narrator.
@@3ggshe11swhat makes you say that? did he mispronounce a word or just because of how good it sounds
@@SpotlightGraphics It's AI, text to speech
Following the suppression of the Bar Kokhba revolt, Jerusalem was rebuilt as a Roman colony under the name of Aelia Capitolina, and the province of Judea was renamed Syria Palaestina, before that it was the land of Israel.
Correction: John wrote John and was a disciple from the beginning."That which we have SEEN and HEARD from the beginning" Eyewitnesses. Matthew was a tax collector(educated) disciple. Mark wrote Peters recollections around 60 AD(peter crucified 67). Luke was a doctor who interviewed eyewitnesses including Mary.
Your commentary on Jesus dual nature was accurate.
Luke was a doctor?
@@nosuchthing8 Yep, a "Greek" (or non-Jewish) doctor. The other 3 gospel accounts were written by Jews. Luke's gospel is arranged more like a historical account, mostly in temporal order. The other three are arranged thematically, with less regard for how events unfolded along the timeline.
There were several direct inaccuracies about what is written in the NT. I get the impression the makers got most of this from 2nd hand sources as opposed to taking it directly from the NT and the Gospels. There is no other book in the world where the 2nd hand accounts of the text is more inaccurate that the Bible. Both books and secular scholars just flat out claim the exact opposite of what the text says on a regular basis. And its goes totally unquestioned.
Luke lived and worked many years along side Paul and the Apostles, the opening of his gospel makes clear he worked diligently with purpose to record a declaration of the first hand eyewitnesses of Christ from the beginning and give assurance that the order and detail of these things are for certain.
The vid also said "illiterate" fisherman. WOW That is grossly inaccurate as most fishermen were basically small business owners who had to be literal to run their business under the Roman Empire. Fisherman were in fact more literal and better educated than the average citizen.
I can see that the guy who tells the story, didn't read the bible.
Where do you get the idea that the 12 were Jewish and the 70(72) were gentiles? The only lists of the 70(72) that I can find with a quick Google search list both Jewish and Gentile names among the 70(72). I would be ever so grateful if you could cite your source for that claim so that I can look into it.
Good point: he would hardly have that many gentile disciples and so few Jewish ones: this looks like a later gloss
I think you mean Ignatius of Antioch when referring to his letter of 108. It looks like you have a picture of Ignatius of Loyola who was not born until 1491.
Years ago I watched a panel of theologians discussing the Bible. I came to believe the Bible speaks to each of our circumstances & we get something different from it each time we read it.
It’s called “the living Word.”
Very interesting subject to learn and digest well.
I wonder why the authhordox church in Ethiopia survived the Catholic establishment
Especially if uncredentialled idiots like the creator of this video post factually inaccurate information.....
As Paul’s writings preceded the gospels, it is ridiculous to claim that Paul “stripped the gospels of their Jewish content.”
I agree that Paul did not strip the gospels of their Jewish content, but the gospels happened before Paul even got saved and then later on wrote letters to different parts of the body of Yehoshua HaMeshiach (the original Hebrew Name of Jesus Christ). To say his letters preceded the gospels doesn’t make sense. But out of curiosity, what do you mean?
He means Paul wrote his letters before the gospels were written
@@FreeinChristForever not only it make sense, it is possible to demonstrate gospels were inspired by paulinism.
Of course, hardline believers will remain in denial.
@@tulenik71 What in the world is “paulism?” Is this some new type of religion that I’ve never heard of?
If you’re speaking of Paul the apostle then he’d be the first in line to be a witness AGAINST you for before he was Paul he was Saul and Saul hated ANYTHING and EVERYTHING to do with Christ and His followers to the point of putting them in prison to murdering them.
@FreeinChristForever we all know what paulism iS. pauls take on christinaity. Focus more on faith than works, play down jewish practices like removal of foreskin, etc.
I love the ending. All the things we agree on. As those are the things that are at least true
Let me put it this way. I'm an Ex-Catholic and Christian... there is so much to this 'story.'
On a tour recently in England , I was told that churches were built on ancient pagan sites and where the community gathered already under a yew tree, which is why there are always yew trees next to churches.
Wrong! At the time when England depended for her military power on archers using the longbow one of the mediaeval monarchs ruled that yew trees should be grown round churches so there would be an assured supply of the wood.
That would make sense. I'm not sure which of you is correct. I know the church did have a tendency to override pagan tradition though. So, I don't consider what you're saying out of the realm of possibility. That sounds about right though as God has been known to do that. He did that when he freed the slaves from Egypt. The feud also turned into a battle of who's God or gods were more powerful between Moses and the Priests. Each of the plagues directly corresponded with an Egyptian god and by the third one the Priests were noticably shaken. They watch the God of Moses systematically dominate each of their Gods as a display. He saved the sun and the Pharos son himself (as they were seen as gods) for last. By the end of if most of the priests had to declare that the God of the Israelites MUST be Lord. Even in modern times scientists have confirmed that the plagues can be explained by a series of natural phenomena (some of which are historically verifiable and the others make scientific sense to follow) on a much larger scale than has ever been seen. That also makes sense as the Egyptian gods were nature gods. He displayed total dominion over the earth.
In the end though can you really be mad at a king for demonstrating that he IS in fact King?
@@andrewdarley8988 a
@@kelseythomson4418 .
Christianity stole so many pagan things. Xmas day pagan festival. Jesus born in sept. Easter pagan festival. Harvest festival pagan. Then islam copied many Christian things.
Excellent video and I enjoyed learning from it as a student of all Religions and subscribed today and thanks for your work on these subjects.
While I'm glad you enjoyed it, I found it went oddly deep into the mythology.
Granted, I am in a minority here, but there was a Roman Catholic Church before the first century, and remained pagan until the latter half of the fourth century. I'm saying this as a practicing Catholic - we don't need to deny our history in order to accept our present reality.
@@MarcillaSmith Marcilla where are you from; because what you say about Roman Catholic church history is pure nonsense.
@@misscameroon8062 you are strangely curious for someone who thinks it's "nonsense." :: raised eyebrow ::
In any event, I'm from a universe where the official religion of the Roman Church became Christianity in 380, in accordance with the Edict of Thessalonica of emperor Theodosius I.
How about you? In what year did the Roman Church become Christian in your dimension?
@@MarcillaSmith I am not sure you didn`t get the wires crossed?Roman Catholic Church before the first century ? Exlpain.
@@misscameroon8062 When Christianity became the official state religion in the 4th century, there was already a Roman Catholic (universal) Church that administered the cult of the Emperor as well as the Capitoline Triad of Jupiter, Juno, and Minerva, and the rest of the ancient deities. The Temple of Jupiter came to be St. Peter's Basilica, and the pontifices of the old ways learned the new rites, and continued in their service to Rome and her God(s). There was no modern notion of separation of church and state. Julius Caesar was a pontiff before he was even consul, and even to this day, our Pope holds the title of Pontifex Maximus.
Interesting info thank you
Glory be to The Father, The Son and The Holy Spirit Amen ✝️💕
Gee , thanks for clearing that up for me .
An interpretive account of what you would hear in public/government education.
In other words you don't know how to respond.
@@nosuchthing8 There are errors of fact
@@andrewplater1782 like what
According to Eusebius (father of church history) standing up at the council, he proclaimed that the gospels came from the writings if the Essenes. Wether rightly or wrongly, IDNK
Wow. Some vid. 👍 a lot of work went into that.
Very nice video! Thank you for putting together all the interesting facts. Just one thing I noticed that is not accurate. At minute marker 7:06 the narrator says that Saint Ignatius used the word, "catholic" in a letter he wrote in the year 108. The image shows Ignatius of Loyola, who was born in 1491 and died in 1556. There was a previous Saint Ignatius (of Antioch) also known as Saint Ignatius Theophorus. This one is known for his letters. The dates of his birth and death are uncertain (as well as most of his letters), but it is likely that the reference in the video corresponds to this one (Saint Ignatius of Antioch) , rather than the one depicted (Saint Ignatius of Loyola), who founded the Jesuits in 1540.
In response to the goodness of the Reformation, Loyola was commissioned to found the jez-ewe-it order, whose sole mission was to suppress the truth of the reformers, who had positively identified the popes as the biblical antichrist power. This order was to use any means, including mass murder, just like the inquisitions, to accomplish this task. They are one of the most despicable groups to curse the face of the earth, so dastardly that Jefferson and Lincoln warned us about them, and even several popes outlawed them THAT'S pretty bad.
quote--- At minute marker 7:06 the narrator says that Saint Ignatius used the word, "catholic" in a letter he wrote in the year 108. The image shows Ignatius of Loyola, who was born in 1491 and died in 1556. There was a previous Saint Ignatius (of Antioch) also known as Saint Ignatius Theophorus. This one is known for his letters. The dates of his birth and death are uncertain (as well as most of his letters), but it is likely that the reference in the video corresponds to this one (Saint Ignatius of Antioch) , rather than the one depicted (Saint Ignatius of Loyola), who founded the Jesuits in 1540.--unquote
-----quote--- There was a previous Saint Ignatius (of Antioch) also known as Saint Ignatius Theophorus.--unquote
------St. Ignatius of Antioch, also called Ignatius Theophoros (Greek: “God Bearer”), (died c. 110, Rome; Western feast day October 17; Eastern feast day December 20), bishop of Antioch, Syria (now in Turkey), known mainly from seven highly regarded letters that he wrote during a trip to Rome, as a prisoner condemned to be executed for his beliefs. He was apparently eager to counteract the teachings of two groups-the Judaizers, who did not accept the authority of the New Testament, and the docetists, who held that Christ’s sufferings and death were apparent but not real. The letters have often been cited as a source of knowledge of the Christian church at the beginning of the 2nd century.
-----
cool bro
@@mitchellosmer1293 The first Ignatius sounds MUCH more sincere than Loyola, who founded the abominable jesuit order.
Ignatius of Antioch was probably a sincere Christian, and not corrupted by the papacy, since Roman Catholicism did not begin until Constantine legislated it as the official state religion in AD 313. This is in contrast to the Romanist fable that the popes and the Catholic Church started with Peter.
@@TIJoe-te9qu You are deceived by the false teachers, confusing the word legislated with 'founded'. Constantine legislated the church, meaning he legalized it. Jesus founded it. By the way which sect or denomination you belong to?
Wasn't he born during the reign of Tiberius?
Jesus died during the reign of Tiberius.
At time 8:32 it states the church became a well defined system by the 2nd century with bishops priest and deacons. CORRECTION we read about this in the book of Acts which was written before the gospels in the 1st century.
Peace be with you ALL!
Ignatius of Antioch mentioned the word "Catholic Church" in one of his letters.
Yes, that is true, and great point. You can find that in his letter to the Symrnaeans, chapter VIII
The word Catholic means universal. So the Catholic church in the first century means the universal church. Hence why in the Anglican version of the Apostles Creed, the word 'catholic' is used.
@@jamespitcher6936
That is true. It can also be found in very fundamental Protestant Baptist Church’s statements of belief- “One Holy Catholic Church”. It merely means universal. The Universal Church is NOT the Roman Catholic Church. The Roman Catholic Church could be part of the Universal Church if they wanted to be…and they are very welcome!
@@joeswartz8286 Lol... Protestants pop up 400 years ago.
St Ignatius mentioned "Catholic Church" and he was thinking about Orthodox Church ..you guys in the west are not quite informed about the 2000 years old fact that orthodox church "official" name is One Holy Catholic and Apostolic Church ...roman catholic church have tried to use the same title but it didn't worked ..also "catholic' doesn't mean "universal" that is primitive and poor latin translation ...catholic is a Greek word. Catholicity means fullness or perfection, wholeness ...there are many Patriarchates and all of them together are united ( in catholicity - Greek word) in to One Holly Catholic nd Apostolic Church also known as Orthodox Church
A thousand years a go - Rome (as one of the patriarchates of the Orthodox church ) CAME OUT or split from the Orthodox Catholic Church and started to preach Roman Catholicism - a deviant and spiritually polluted version of Orthodox Catholicism
It all started when Jesus referred to Peter as Cephas then later stated "upon this rock I shall build my church". When you really think about it, this is mind-boggling stuff. Jesus actually started the christian church right there. 🤔🙏
Hopefully I'm not coming across as difficult. "Rock" has been interpreted by Catholicism to mean "Peter", but that really make no sense, other than to fit the narrative of succession. Regardless, say it is Peter, how has the priesthood been carried forth unbroken since Peter? Can the Roman Catholic Church show a linage of priesthood authority from the time of Jesus to today? The Rock upon we must build is on Jesus Christ and revelation.
No, it started with council of Nicea in 325 AD
So you are going to start a church based on a man? (Peter)
Based on a person who denied Jesus three times? (Peter)
Based on the sinner that needed a savior? (Peter)
Sorry, that not how its happened.
The christian church is based on Jesus, as Jesus claim’s to be son of Man, God in the Flesh NOT on Peter…
John 3:16-18
John 14:6
John 3:3
You are correct my brother Jesus did say that!
Whichever sins you retain, will be retained in Heaven. Like the sin of Protestantism.
I Subscribed how do I get the e book ebook
Is there a discord server where everyone wants to go to, to discuss this?
Not bad for such an introductory video
There are so many errors in this clip, did no one bother to do a bit of research?
Thst's right.👍
I'm with you!
They just repeats the same non sense over and over.
Roman Catholicism is one earthly/mundane organization inspired by Lucifer himself, an entity if you will, promoting an absolute mockery of what Christianity really is through very aggressive marketing/financial/influence/power goals. It's as cheap, religious and false as all others such as Judaism, Islam, Mormon, Jehovah's Witnesses, Scientology, Hinduism, Hare Krishna or Buddhism...just to mention a few.
The saddest part is how most christians look at our movement and our Lord and Savior JesusChrist. Their idea, for the most part, is greatly erratic flirting with pure blasphemy.
yeah i wanted to support this channel but it’s just another one of those mass produced garbage channels, if you’re making informational videos you have an obligation to fact check
For anyone interesting in this topic :
I highly recommend the book “The Immortality Key: The Secret History of the Religion with No Name by Brian C. Muraresku”
His nature is shown through his people that accept his spirit. Be ye Holy as your father in heaven is.
Jesus Rules
Jesus Rules and Romans drool.
8:48 The Creed can be traced back to within 20 years of Jesus death. Paul's epistle to the Corinthians expresses the Creed and its relation to the "Church of God" . In the epistles Paul speaks in further depth about the organization of the Church and speaks highly of the Church.
Paul speaks highly of the church known as The Way, later known as Christians in Antioch.
This is in stark contrast to the counterfeit church/state hybrid known as the papacy, which bears little resemblance to the pure, non-politically involved, popeless church of apostolic times, which did not go about killing "hetetics" in the holocaust known as the Catholic inquisitions.
@@TIJoe-te9quyou're a fool. Stop.
@@TIJoe-te9qu Nothing you said even makes sense. The Holocaust was committed by German socialists not Catholics 😂 are you stupid?
@@TIJoe-te9quExactly! More people need to read Foxes Book of Martyrs !
@@Revelation18-4 I don't know how papists can turn a blind eye to those ruthless mass murders done as "service to God. "
this is so good
where do they get the 70-72 gentile disciples from?
VERY interested to examine the changes in "Christianity" between 60 A.D. and 325 A.D.!!
What changed?
@Wendi Lane more than you are willing to accept
Yes, especially since Constantine changed Christianity into the official state religion called Catholicism in 313, and passed the first mandatory Sunday observance laws in 321, contrary to the 7th day Sabbath observed by Jesus, Paul, the rest of the apostles, the Gentiles, and of course the Jews as well.
Paul says in Ephesians 4:5 he had spent 15 days with him fellowshiping Gal.1:8. Hosea 4:6;Amos 3:3 .Peter was handed the keys to the New Testament Church in Matthew 16:13-20 to fulfill John 17:17-20& John 3:1-8. 2Tim.2:15 ,3:15-16. Luke 24:47-48, Mk. 16:16.
Acts 1:8, 2:1-4, 2:36-47. Jesus is the door to heaven. Peter has the keys ? Acts 2:38 !!! But it’s locked because of the disobedience of Adam and Eve and the devil is still roaring and roaming seeking who he may devour. 1 Cor.15:1-4 Paul declared the Gospel the same as Peter did.
@deanashcraft1631 Yes, but here's the thing about the bible, though.... it's all made up. There's no reason to believe that it's God's word, and if you read it objectively then it's easy to see how there's no possibility way a perfect, all knowing all loving God had anything to do with it.
Nice write-up. 😊👍
At time 8:33 the author of this youtube states, " by the time of the 2nd century the church became a well- defined system with authorities such as bishops deacons and priest. Actually this came in during the time Acts was written. chapter 6 writes about how the church is growing and the need for assistance there is some other chapters as well
The Catholic Church evolved over time I understand that it didn't start during his ministry crucifixion or after his Resurrection in a "chronological order" it evolved through the work of Christs followers of the day
This was so interesting. I learned something new 😌
Well unlearn it. It's not accurate.
@@pistoffpussycat5778 thank you. Not correct at all
don't listen to the negative comments to your post.... haters are everywhere now a days.
I might disagree about that collective memory thing(exception being Luke) but 1.the gospels claim to have been an eyewitness account for the life and ministry of christ. 2.it claims to have some sort of a divine inspiration behind it.
Matthew was with Jesus, John was Jesus. Whoever wrote is knowing contradiction what was actually written in the Bible. and should have stated evidence immediately. Not blatantly lied. He is also deceived the listener. All the narrator has was site this and why. Knowingly deceiving. Came to get/find evidence of how 2nd century church leaders sold out. What real evidence pro or con , you won’t find it with fictional wishing. If you want to prove something fiction, you don’t start with fiction.
Of course, we are to understand that Jesus is like us, he understands our predicament and temptations and watches our success and failures and dis interest. And Mary His /Our mother also is watching.....O'My Jesus forgive us our sins, save us from the fires of hell, lead all souls to heaven especially those who have most need of thy Mercy.Amen.
@Pat Ludwain the year 382 AD Pope Damasus I gave the world the Bible!!! 73 books total!!! 46 books in the old testament, the one that Jesus read in the synagogues every Saturday!
I can assure you, that Peter has NOTHING to do with the Catholic Church. Peter would be the last one to worship Mary. The video is a lie bases on lies of Catholicism thrown together by satan.
Catholicism was started by Ignatus who defected from The Saints in 90 A.D. because he didn’t want to share in leadership. Ignatus wanted to be The Sole Leader, so he started Catholicism and elevated the office of a bishop to head leader and self proclaimed himself to be a bishop.
I am a senior citizen, we were taught this at a young age , but now lies are being mingled in by satan to hide the truth of the matter. As a matter of fact we were taught in school and college at that time that the world’s three major religions were Catholics , Christians , and Jews. This was before Muslims had a explosive growth. The Catholics just started to call themselves Christians about maybe 20 years ago or so
Catholics do not follow the same doctrine as Christians.
Catholics esteem Mary as the Highest and that’s who they pray to.
Christians KNOW CHRIST as The Highest and that’s who we pray to.
Catholics think salvation is through the works.
Christians know salvation is to be BORN AGAIN of water and of The Spirit, like Jesus Christ said in John 3:5.
Catholics believe in baptizing babies.
Christians know that Jesus said Children are already the Greatest in The Kingdom of GOD
@Pat Ludwa Mt.8:14 and Lk.4:38 also mention Peters mother-in-law.
You did not include in your video about an early church father who 1st used the word katolikos in his letters.
i will never refer to before christ as before common era
Excellent video - a fair and balanced coverage of the origins of this religious institution. It does not take sides, but, where there is controversy or differing schools of thought, it points out what they are. This video also covers all the major facts and points for the truth seeker to know regarding the origins of Catholicism.
2:54 gives the order of the Gospels as Mark, Matthew, Luke, and John. A modern theory, but the traditional order has good historical testimony, as early as Irenaeus of Lyon, a student of Polycarp of Smyrna, who was a student of the Apostle John. Can you imagine the grandchildren of soldiers of the American Revolution not knowing who wrote the Declaration of Independence or that it came before The Constitution? That is about the time gap here three generations.
Well what do you think accounts for the difference? I assume it’s modern people looking at which book appears to come from which, like Luke and Matthew appear to come from Mark and Q, for example. I assume they’re using the Greek texts? I dunno what they’re looking for specifically.
@@rxw5520 Q is a modern theory, very questionable, NO manuscript evidence.
@@llla_german_ewoklll6413 You seem to be saying what I'm saying in your first sentence. Your 2nd sentence seems to disagree but I don't see your point. On your 3rd sentence, The gap I speak of is 3 generations and I list the 3 generations I am talking about.
@@glstka5710 Looking back at your comment, I misread it. I apologize for the misunderstanding. But I will say that is only a two generational gap. If we speak of Irenaeus, he is two places removed from John. If there was one more before Irenaeus, and after Polycarp or John, then it would be a 3 generation gap.
@@llla_german_ewoklll6413 I wasn't counting John as the 0th generation. John 1st, Polycar 2nd, Irenaeus 3rd. looks like we basically agree.
I would suggest reading the book ,
" Pagan Christianity " by Frank Viola! He has done an in depth study of Roman Catholicism and its influence on the Protestants!
One important note : The name of the holy land during Jesus's time was not "Palestine" : The name "Palestine" was given to the holy land by Roman emperor Hadrian, only around 130 ad (more than a century after the crucifixion)
.
Thanks!
When Mary registered the birth of her baby, what year did the registrar, write down in his ledger?
If such record existed, probably they should have entered in, 3000+. The jews today do have 5000+ in their calendar !!
Did you know that? The Roman's kept tally from their own conquest days
That's a question for ChatGPT
I don't know this for sure, but I think from the old testament readings, the birth would have been registered in the year of the ruler of that time 🤔 - look at how Daniel starts 1:1 "In the third year of the reign of Jehoiakim King of Judah ...." That was the way the year was identified. 💒
I was hoping to hear the Coptic church mentioned, but am glad to learn that Christianity started as part of Judaism at the time.
Christianity is the fulfillment of Judaism. Has nothing whatsoever to do with Romes Catholic Church. It is Christ Himself that builds His body the church.
@@georgebentonjr3876Catholic and Orthodox are the first Christians...
Jesus preached mainly to his Jewish brethren. All the disciples were also Jewish & the New Testament borrowed much from the Old Testament .
When Jesus and the Apostles preached, the Old Testament was all they used (they didn’t use the apocryphal books that the Rome cult uses)
@@chrislachat459of course because the Old Testament existed before the New Testament. What was Rome's connection to the New Testament that you mentioned it like it was the creation of Rome? Read your history!!
So what is your point? The New Testament derived a lot from the Old Testament and is a continuation and fulfilment of the old. What's the problem?
They went out from us, *but they were not of us* for if they had been of us, they would no doubt have continued with us: but they went out, that they might be made manifest that they were not all of us.
{1 John 2:19}
The church *that is at Babylon* elected together with you, saluteth you; and so doth Marcus my son.
{1 Peter 5:13}
Spotonski !
Correct quotation of 1 Peter 5:13 (NIV) : She who is in Babylon, chosen together with you, sends you her greetings, and so does my son Mark.
@@ndumferdy2545
You're using a Non Inspired Version.
Interesting. It’s good to explore the many facets of history and where it all came from.
This gave me great insight into the Catholic religion.
Great video
If you knew true history, you would not say that
@@dvdortiz9031 I already know history more than you would know from your perspective and even without religion influence humanity would have been the same or far worse sadistically as religion actually attempted to instill moral responsibility whereas everything else suggests do as you wish and don’t think of the consequences as well as how horrid and dangerous human nature literally is
I can assure you, that Peter has NOTHING to do with the Catholic Church. Peter would be the last one to worship Mary. The video is a lie bases on lies of Catholicism thrown together by satan.
Catholicism was started by Ignatus who defected from The Saints, because he didn’t want to share in leadership. Ignatus wanted to be The Sole Leader, so he started Catholicism and elevated the office of a bishop to head leader and self proclaimed himself to be a bishop.
I am a senior citizen, we were taught this at a young age , but now lies are being mingled in by satan to hide the truth of the matter. As a matter of fact we were taught in school and college at that time that the world’s three major religions were Catholics , Christians , and Jews. This was before Muslims had a explosive growth. The Catholics just started to call themselves Christians about maybe 20 years ago or so
Catholics do not follow the same doctrine as Christians.
Catholics esteem Mary as the Highest and that’s who they pray to.
Christians KNOW CHRIST as The Highest and that’s who we pray to.
Catholics think salvation is through the works.
Christians know salvation is to be BORN AGAIN of water and of The Spirit, like Jesus Christ said in John 3:5.
Catholics believe in baptizing babies.
Christians know that Jesus said Children are already the Greatest in The Kingdom of GOD
I can assure you, that Peter has NOTHING to do with the Catholic Church. Peter would be the last one to worship Mary. The video is a lie bases on lies of Catholicism thrown together by satan.
Catholicism was started by Ignatus who defected from The Saints in 90 A.D. because he didn’t want to share in leadership. Ignatus wanted to be The Sole Leader, so he started Catholicism and elevated the office of a bishop to head leader and self proclaimed himself to be a bishop.
I am a senior citizen, we were taught this at a young age , but now lies are being mingled in by satan to hide the truth of the matter. As a matter of fact we were taught in school and college at that time that the world’s three major religions were Catholics , Christians , and Jews. This was before Muslims had a explosive growth. The Catholics just started to call themselves Christians about maybe 20 years ago or so
Catholics do not follow the same doctrine as Christians.
Catholics esteem Mary as the Highest and that’s who they pray to.
Christians KNOW CHRIST as The Highest and that’s who we pray to.
Catholics think salvation is through the works.
Christians know salvation is to be BORN AGAIN of water and of The Spirit, like Jesus Christ said in John 3:5.
Catholics believe in baptizing babies.
Christians know that Jesus said Children are already the Greatest in The Kingdom of GOD
@@steadfastunmoveable9751 Mary exclaimed to Elizabeth, “My soul magnifies the Lord, and my spirit rejoices in God my Savior” (Luke 1:46-47)
Did Roman Catholics change the Christian Creed established by the early Church? If they changed the beliefs, how can it claim to be the original belief? What does the book of Galations say about this question? What does Orthodox mean? If you study what Orthodox Christianity is, then you will discover that this video reframes reality to suit different teachings.
What was gentile about the 70 or 72 'other' disciples of Jesus?
My guy just started with professing nestorianism 😅 . If you want to discuss your opening statement please inform me in a reply
He definitely didn’t explain it correctly
It’s hard to by the claim that the Evangelists did not mean to provide a biographical account of Jesus’ life as they followed characteristics of biography of their time. So if their writings followed this model it would follow they meant the Gospels as biographies which were historical albeit from different perspectives meant for different audiences.
God sacrificed himself to himself where is the sacrifice love fairy tells
@@haroldkmayes3591 Not to mention that is stated in the Bible that no one can pay for the sins of others. Christianity is a bunch of nonsense created by Roman Empire.
@@zedwart8534 You're not wrong. But you're also no entirely correct either. True Christianity is about understanding that the antagonist is the self proclaimed God of the Old Testament. This has been hidden by both the Catholic faith and the Jews. Yahweh is, quite literally, Satan. Any child can make this connection and see the glaringly obvious contradiction between Yahweh and Yeshua when reading the bible for themselves. One commits infanticide, the other states that hurting children is wrong... One reveals himself to Moses and speaks to him face to face, the other states very clearly that God has never been seen by any man. There is a reason why Jesus calls Satan "The Father of Lies", he's been lying to the Jews for thousands of years...
@@haroldkmayes3591 Understanding sacrifice in the vein of gift with respect to the idea of covenant is the key to understanding Christian beliefs. I have no doubt you have no intention of properly doing so, but this was more for anyone that may read your comment.
@@zedwart8534 God is Love, and with Love all things are possible!
Trying to disprove this is like trying to prove you are not alive,
Which I very much hope you don't! Facing the fire or the jump from the Twin Towers I'm pretty sure I would have jumped, but you don't know until you have to choose. I hope you choose life,
by far the best option! 🙂
thank you for this!! i grew up catholic but had so many questions on the actual history of jesus and the bible that were always answered in ways that didn’t make sense to me. this video explains so much and it’s structured very well.
Have you ever read Crossan, or Ehrman, or Pagles? They are excellent sources on the historical Jesus and the early church.
Story of Jesus Christ was a HOAX designed to control the people, Biblical scholar claimsTHE man and story behind Jesus Christ was a Roman hoax designed to control the people, a scholar has sensationally claimed.
By SEAN MARTIN
14:02, Mon, Feb 14, 2022 | UPDATED: 14:04, Mon, Feb 14, 2022
Read Henry Chadwicks history of the early church
Read the didache and St Ignatius of Antioch
So Jesus is Catholic? Like Peter?
Mother was the First Christian followed by Saint Joseph.
The book of Luke is written using only eye witness testimony. I find that just amazing. Thank God for the cross, the blood & Jesus Christ. Without Him all is lost.
😂 Anyone could write that. The entire book sounds fictional
Five eyewitnesses is not true.
Your content is superb... This channel should blow up now.
How can you talk such garbage. This idiot gets nearly everything WRONG. The 72 disciples for instance were certainly NOT Gentiles. ALL of Jesus's disciples were Jews. The guy is just make up stupid stories to hide that he doesn't actually know anything.
Literally. Didn't pay attention to the video and just wanted to read some irrelevant theological comments, as if there were any other kind. I wasn't dissapointed.
Hahahaha CATHOLICISM SHOULD BE BLOWN UP....
Yes it should blow up with people in protest of the blatant lies and deceit on here.
@@mariafarrugia1192 Read the Book of the Acts 5:38-39, you will be disappointed. 2000 years have past since then.
Go ahead. Blow up the Church!!! If you can do it!!
I am proud catholic man i love jesus is king and my protector and healer✌♥️🤧🙏
you can be proud of that, but not the roman catholic church. it has too many man-made doctrines and practices which defy the word of God, such as mariology.
The bible says, "pride goes before destruction, and a haughty spirit before a fall." So, which comes first, religion, which can't save you, or the son of the living God?
It's nonsense you fool
Pride made lucifer the evil one. God resists tge proud but gives grace to the humble.
@@robinthomas2847 some people put, their religion above, Christ, which is the same as the lord mentioned about, "having, the two masters."
im able to build and guide my own beliefs based on this history
Well explained 😊
77, educated in the Roman Catholic Church by Jesuits, Ursuline nuns, taught the "early church" began the establishment process when Jesus Christ pronounced Peter, the "Rock of the Faith" establishing him as its first head, during the latter part of his 3 year ministry.
I love the grounded reality of this channel!!!
The open mind and wide knowledge that is brings, it made me think outside the box and I took a step that changed my finance forever.
keep it up ........!
Only God knows how grateful I am... After so much struggles everything is finally falling into places!!
Good to hear, but how do you mean?
I'm trying to process meaning out of what you said.
This channel? Financially? 🤔
Very interesting and well-researched as well. Thank you for the informative video.
The video is all a lie when compared to the real truth to it all.
From my POV, to speak of the history of "Catholicism," there is the ecclesiology of the Roman church, and there is also the theology of Christianity - both of which begin centuries before 1 CE/AD, and only merge in the 4th century CE/AD.
@@MarcillaSmith WHAT YOU SAID, "both of which begin centuries before 1 CE/AD, and only merge in the 4th century CE/AD.'\" IS A LIE. CHRISTIANITY WAS AN ALREADY ESTABLISHED PAGAN RELIGION BEFORE CONSTANTINE USED THE TITLE TO PUT ALL THE PAGANS UNDER ONE HEADING AND MADE IT THE FALSE SATANIC RELIGION THAT IS PUSHED AS THE TRUTH SINCE 312 C.E., THE CATHOLIC DENOMINATION OF CHRISTIANITY DID NOT EXIST UNTIL 1559 C.E., AT THE COUNCIL OF TRENT.
@@MarcillaSmith I am not of a Christian denomination myself, my interest in understanding it is simply to be able to understand the history involved with Christians and war and also with politics and society, since the country I'm in has about 86% Christian population through and through. All the beliefs involved in the religion and its appliance in modern society, especially a Western society that is Eurocentric in its culture, it has a whole lot of factors withhin the Middle East, being that its a religious belief developed first into the Middle East than it expanded into the Romans and was adopted specifically by the Franks (Charlemagne), and from thereit expanded into what it became eventually. Its worth noting that the written documentation we have in Ancient History research that has to do with all that the Bible has included inside of it as a literary work has only come to us from its original form in Papyrus P1 and Papyrus P4, which is incomplete, and whose accounts of the holy figure they hold to belief in, Jesus Christ of Nazareth, is quite literaly addressed from different points of view at all times by the disciples of his that wrote about him, since he wrote nothing at all himself. Than we also know about the Gospel Of Timaeus and all of that, which documents the more difficult points of Jesus to more modern understanding, the point were you'd say he isn't exactly a ideal holy figure, such as him making a entire village of people go blind, or him killing two children who affected his play time as a child as well, with a form of magic involved. Since many accounts in the Bible are full of magical explanations that aren't even remotely scientific but to which its believers claim has value and logic behind it over a mystical force projecting them into its historical time period, its really hard to understanding completely if all of this by the original forms of the Catholics as it expanded into the Western Roman Empire holds any actual mental illness or history of domestic abuse involved or hallucinations or anything around such things, as I honestly have lots of suspicion over many figures of the Bible when they claimed what they claimed over a magical explanation linked to Yahweh... specifically with the accounts of Jesus, Moses and all the stuff with both Revelation and Genesis.
@@EthylamineNot to spoil it for you, but it's mythology. There's very little in the way of evidence for a "historical Jesus."
And really, how much does that matter in terms of the faith? Our core belief is that, "... we believe in one Lord, Jesus Christ, the only begotten Son of God, born of the Father before all ages, God from God, Light from Light, True God from True God, begotten not made, consubstantial with the Father, through Him all things were made... "
My point is that while in the West we tend to think of Jesus first as a human man, our Creed goes to considerable length to make it clear that we are primarily talking about the Divine _Logos._ But not everyone is ready to start there, so yes, we also have "the _Logos_ made flesh."
In understanding the origins and growth of Christianity (to this day, even), I think it's helpful to keep in mind the competing interests at play, including but not limited to 1) the masses who want a superhero, 2) the rulers who want a hierarchy of control, 3) the theologians who want to navel gaze, and 4) the activists who want to mobilize people to act.
Constantine's involvement in the church changed the religion and put it on the map
Wrong. Thanks for simplistic misunderstanding
Correct 100% about King Constantine. He spun the papacy into power with his political court, even mandating Sunday observation by law. Politics shounever mix with the church. Look what a killing machine the papacy became, slaying "hetetics" for the Roman empire. Disgusting murderers of millions.
The whore was drunken with the blood of the saints, indeed.
No
@@cristianosiqueira1536 Yes. Your simplistic "no" cannot change the history books. Why not stop protecting the devil and his evil popes? Their whole job is to kill Protestants and their infants, according to the jesuit extreme oath of induction.
"In her ( the papacy) was found the blood of ALL slain upon the earth."That's why the papacy is gong into the lake of fire very soon. Her cup of iniquity is full.
I can't wait to see Romanism fried to a crisp for all the murders it has done.
Yes, in 313 the ruler Constantine claimed he had a dream that in the sign of 'IHS' ( really Isis, Horus, and Set), he would conquer. So he forced the Catholic church-state upon everyone, including Sunday enforcement laws with civil and criminal penalties for being caught working on his counterfeit Sunday-sabbath. The papacy thus began in tyranny, and aspires to rule the world once again with its Sun-day MARK OF THE BEAST. Coming soon :national Sunday laws per Poop Francisco's Laudato Si proclamation.
This was an excellent, unbiased, informative video. Thank you so much!
claiming to be a religion of peace and love while also refering to pagans as "converted" instead of slaughtered? how is this unbiased?
@@thecircleandthesquare8980 I was referring to the video itself, not necessarily the religion.
@@TomStrohOptimalDailyLivingA great video with a lot of truth. I was born catholic but I’m now a disciple of the Lord Jesus Christ while making other disciples on my journey with the Lord Jesus Christ 24/7
@@seanrathmakedisciples1508 You're pulling other ignorant people away from Jesus' one, true church. You are doing exactly what Jesus told Peter, that Satan would try to do.
@catholic defence and truth seekers *You are D by R Church. 5 sources say Salvation Not By Works (Faith Alone) is a true doctrine. Scriptures, early church and Apostles/Jesus all affirmed it. Even Old R Church believed in that in early stages. R Church started to deny them centuries later and introduced its m m doctrines of Works Salvation.*
*Where in the Bible teaches "faith + good works + partake R sacraments + submit to R pontiff + be in R Church + devote to Mary = to be saved"?*
Exactly right!
Faith alone is not in the bible dufus.
Only place in the bible they are together is " Faith Alone without WORKS is dead"
Love how the bible destroys bible only protestantism.
what the heck is "you are D by R Church"?
@@lucillejerome5511 *URD. Lol*
Wow Jesus seemed to be a very cool guy
He was everything good, cool included and to a divine extent
Jesus was sound, he was a socialist.
@@mjramirez6008 He was very likely totally made up and a fraud by zealots of the church.
Why were people upset with the Roman Catholic Church?
Some felt that the Catholic Church was more interested in money and power than in saving souls. For example, the church sold 'indulgences' for those who had committed sins. For a fine, paid to the church, your sin would be forgiven and when you died, the Church said that you would go to heaven.
5:29 A common apologist talking point is to ask why followers of Christ would claim to be so, or have witnessed the resurrection,falsely even if it meant persecution. Basically who would fake it to be in a club that was having its members persecuted. this line about Paul seeing Christianity as a liberation from strict Jewish rules would be very appealing to a lot of folks.
You're understanding is from the perspective of a 21st century westerner. There was not really much of a scientific methodology developed yet, women gave birth without anesthesia. Men fought in brutal war all over the planet with spears, swords, There was no economic development where the division of labor could shed most people from drudgery. There were no jobs involving pushing small buttons. People sacrificed their first born children burning them in fire 🔥. Daily existence anywhere didn't involve a call to Doordash. SO. Jews washing plates,separation of foods, some small sacrifice of flour, meal , a bovine, was worth being impaled and feed to a lion..Ok.if that maje sence to you .I didn't know why.
@@dannyjackson5189 I'm not saying people would risk being thrown to the lions over hygiene rules. Were there not much more restrictive aspects of ancient Judaism? If I was a Jew could I marry a gentile woman?
@@Mettle_DAD Why would that matter why would you be hanging out with Gentile chicks anyways. Your mother and your father will get you a wife. And mostly the gentiles were enemies of the jewish people. It wasn't like Bridget loves Bernie. A fling with a sexy foreigner was probably not worth being flayed burned or pulled apart and changing your religion and losing your whole entire family.
@@Mettle_DAD Those people lived in a different paradigm. They didn't live in the middle of the sexual revolution where everything is desire and sex. poured on. As I said the notion of romantic love and marriage are just recent things.
@@dannyjackson5189 institutionally the concept of "romantic love" is modern. But men and women through all time have sought out love not just utilitarian partnerships.yes back then women were considered property and essentially sold at a young age to a man willing to buy her. Which would probably be even more reason folks were looking for something different than that system. The old christian teachings aren't much of a step up. Everything is about man's subservience to God and women's subservience to men.....but it was a slightly better deal for women. They had relatively more freedom
The Catholics attribute Jesus saying something like "upon this rock I'll build my church". Church in old Greek is ekklesía, which means assembly. Catholics argue that Jesus meant assembly as an institution, i.e. a permanent assembly. And also claim that Jesus mean Peter, the first Pope, to be the "rock", as Peter comes from the old Greek Petros meaning "rock". This is why they claim Catholicism was established by Jesus himself.
What would anyone gain by arguing with your corked???
Don't even get me started on Peter Pan.
Some if the statements are wrong. The gospel written was inspired by the Spirit of God through His men. Is not collective memory. Mr. Luke wrote on accounts of what he saw. And Christianity started within Jews in jaruselm by 12 and later 70 72 before it went outside
czcams.com/video/_RioVzvSMjY/video.html
Have you proof that the bible is inspired by god? The bible is not god's word, but man made.
@@heinmolenaar6750 The New Testament is man made inspired by Jesus. The Old Testament is man made inspired by God. Hope that clears up the confusion....
@@serpentsepia6638 ALL scripture is inspired by God, God-breathed, men wrote as led by the Holy Spirit. ALL of the Bible is God's Word.
Christianity as sutch , is mixed with Baàl (Nimrod who was incarnated by Satan ) , birthday is 25 Desember , easter rabbits and eggs , is the firtillaty god where they slept together , and 9 month's later these baby's were on the Baàl altaar.
Al these "Christain hollydays are Baàl hulliday's. Jew's pray to Satan , there father ( John 8: 44) and the Jew started every Christain religion and walked away with the money.
Catholic chuch treasurekeeper is Rotschild of London.
yk when Messi scored a goal he used to do a style first he touch his forehead and left shoulder and then right shoulder...i was kinda confused at first
Very informative!!
"And I say to thee: That thou art Peter; and upon this rock I will build my church, and the gates of hell shall not prevail against it. And I will give to thee the keys of the kingdom of heaven. And whatsoever thou shalt bind upon earth; it shall be bound also in heaven; and whatsoever thou shalt loose upon earth, it shall be loosed also in heaven."
Why did you post this?
@@ripcord8738 because it shows the entire point of the Catholic Church. Jesus changed Simon's name to rock, and said he would build his church on that rock.
@@nosuchthing8 no he didn't say that, you believe that cause that's what catholic church teach.
@@OLPC80 it's straight from the Bible.
This was specifically for Peter
@catholic defence and truth seekers *You keep L. 1. Exact Word Criterion is Not a proof for doctrines. The word trinity is not in the Bible but the doctrine is. Similarly Faith Alone which means Salvation Not By Works. 2. Old Catholic Bibles do show Sola Fede/Faith Alone. You were refuted right from beginning yet you kept L for 5 days.*
“ Catholic translators before the time of Luther had given the same translation. So in the Nuremberg Bible, 1483, "Nur durch den glauben." And the Italian Bibles of Geneva, 1476, and of Venice, 1538, per sola fede. The Fathers also often use the expression, "man is justified by faith alone;"
Swan, James. "Luther Added The Word "Alone" to Romans 3:28?". February 05, 2006. Retrieved 29 March 2014.
Hodge, Charles, Commentary on the Epistle to the Romans (New Edition), 1864, p100
Even some Catholic versions of the New Testament also translated Romans 3:28 as did Luther. The Nuremberg Bible (1483), “allein durch den glauben” and the Italian Bibles of Geneva (1476) and of Venice (1538) say “per sola fede.” Others previous to Luther may have differed in theological interpretation, yet saw the thrust of the words implied “alone.”
The Romanists, indeed, made a great outcry against that version as a gross perversion of Scripture, although Catholic translators before the time of Luther had given the same translation. So in the Nuremberg Bible, 1483, "Nur durch den glauben." And the Italian Bibles of Geneva, 1476, and of Venice, 1538, per sola fede. The Fathers also often use the expression, "man is justified by faith alone;" so that Erasmus, De Ratione Concionandi, Lib. III., says, "Vox sola, tot clamoribus lapidata hoc saeculo in Luthero, reverenter in Patribus auditur." See Koppe and Tholuck on this verse.
you said
almost 5 days now and not one single verse on faith alone
The Encyclopedia of Religion admits: “Theologians today are in agreement that the Hebrew Bible does not contain a doctrine of the Trinity.” And the New Catholic Encyclopedia also says: “The doctrine of the Holy Trinity is not taught in the O[ld] T[estament].”
Does the book contain ALL of the history?
We have extra books in the Catholic Bible, like 6 or 7.
AND STILL CLUELESS
Not bad for such a short video.
St. Cyril of Jerusalem wrote catechetical letters in 350 ad. In book 18, he writes, "don't ask where the church is, but where is the Catholic Church".
Tertullian writes against the Heretics in 200 ad. In book 21, he records about the apostolic churches.
have in mind that he was talking about Orthodox Church
This is a good video but the glaring error. Is the lack of mention of the Eastern Orthodox Church