Harry Potter and the Sorcerer's Stone - PS1 vs. PS2 | Side by Side
Vložit
- čas přidán 21. 07. 2021
- Side by side coparison between the Playstation and the Playstation 2 versions of the game Harry Potter and the Philosopher's Stone/Sorcerer's Stone. Both versions were emulated in high definition.
Become a Patron and get access to exclusive blog posts on Patreon: / neogamertvga - Hry
PS1 Hagrid is already perfect. You can only go worse from there.
I know, that's what I've been telling people.
ps1 hagrid is the goat
Man the jump from ps1 to ps2 was crazy.
same from ps2 to ps3
but not so great from ps3 to ps4.
@@danilopablo9848 há um abismo gráfico entre ps3 e ps4
@@danilopablo9848 ps4 was a pretty good jump. Compare RE6 and RE7 for example. The jump to ps5 though, not much.
@@danilopablo9848 PS4 was a massive jump, just compare Uncharted 3 and 4, not even close.
@@chrisredfield8548 we haven't seen the best of PS5 yet tho, mostly because games still being made on PS4.
9:25 for the big man ;)
miss ya big man
I grew up with the PS1 game so I just have bias to that one. Never knew a PS2 version existed
Oh my god ..you just took me down a memory trip ..I played these games on my old potato pc and I thought this game was the most realistic game ever as a child ..I'm gonna have to play these again .
Kids nowadays will never understand and appreciate how we used to look at the PS1 graphic with excitement and glee, thinking it's already in HD and a pleasant to the eyes. It's funny how outdated it looks now but we as a kids never ever seems to bother about it, I guess perception or the exposure to a better graphic in the current era has ruined our view on it. 5:19 ah yes, this is exactly a nightmare to control with the PS1's controller. It'll haunt me forever.
I wouldn't call it ruining as these are just generational things. The kids these days will experience what they experience and you can't really call it a ruined view as it's just all they know
@@SupremeKame yes, the cycle continues
It also helped if you were raised with 8bit and 16bit consoles, before I had a PS1 I used to play on the Famicom and Sega Mega Drive, so the jump to PS1 was something out of this world for my 90's kid brain.
The current era didnt ruin it, you never watched ps1 cgi cutscenes?
@@SupremeKame They literally throw shit at every game in the comments for any reason. Either they don’t like the animation, then they don’t like the lighting, they always don’t like something. And in general, the gaming industry itself has fallen into a trap and is trying to keep up with trends faster, but by completing games with interesting mechanics. And at the exit we see an overgrown TikTok audience who wants here and now.
It's been 20 years and just now I realized there was a PS2 Sorcerer's Stone game. Never saw this one before.
x2
It was released in 2003 when there was a gap between Chamber and Askaban
Philosophers stone
The music in the old games is magical.So much nostalgia.
Both of these are among my favorite games of all time. I love that they each give a unique experience.
I'm sorry. It doesn't matter what upgrades the ps2 version got. Ps1 harry Potter will be forever just better (at least for me)
Están horribles los dos, las caras de PS2 no son envidiables, son juegos desarrollados con prisa ni siquiera son lo mejor de sus consolas y creo ni salieron traducidos, así que mejor ver las películas.
PS1 faces are from the movies
PS2 faces are from the books
Every1 wins
PS1 faces are from hell
A huge difference :)
I played PS1 version on emulator and enjoyed it very much :)
9:28 me when i peel potatoes vs when my mother peel potatoes
Ah my childhood. I loved these games so much.
This PS1 version is the best.
It's not about graphics.... it's about actually enjoy the game.
Ikr! It's like they put so much effort in the PS2 and PC graphics that they totally forgot about the gameplay
i think pc version is best
Exactly. But i prefer both experience. It feels like missing some details in one game while knowing all details in other game.
The PC version is indeed lame but for me the PS2 version of the Philosopher's Stone is equal to the PS1. I enjoy them both a lot. They also have stealth missions which the PC hasn't.
and you somehow can't "actually enjoy the game" on newer hardware? lmao
Hagrid looks haggard in the PS1 version
Underrated comment 😂😂😂
He looks niggardly
PS1 HP game calms me
It's sooo peaceful
This is one of the instances where I believe that the limitations of the PlayStation 1 are what created a better gameplay experience you had way more mini-games and the Rhythm Section for the Spells and if you look at the PS2 version yeah it looks better but the environments are boring and kind of empty
Yes, when they put too much effort on the Graphics, they forgot about the script, gameplay, and the overall feeling of the game
What you just described is exactly the reason why modern gaming is worse than gen 3, 4 and 5 gaming. Too much time is spent making it look pretty.
Ps2 better cus I grow up with it
I love PS1 and PS2 due to being little similar graphics
Imagine you wish for Harry Potter game for your PS2 and you end up getting ps1 version 😂
Id be happier haha😂
Other way around
even better because ps1 hagrid
Ps1 hagrid is absolutely peak design
I'm here to leave some love for the PS2 version😁😁😁
2:22 is my childhood soundtrack 2:43
Wow, no love at all in the comments for the PS2 version. Well, for me, the PS2 versions are more fun. I didn’t have the PS1 console so I never got a chance to play the PS1 version until much later when I bought this game and the PS1 Chamber of Secrets game and played them on my PS2. By then, I’ve played the PS2 versions of these games and grown attached to them. So going backwards in time was…well, they just didn’t seem as fun for me. I still had fun playing the PS1 versions and I would play them again if I got the urge but I just prefer the PS2 versions and probably have a better chance revisiting the PS2 versions since I played those games more than the PS1 versions. I bought my sister the PS1 sorcerer’s stone game when it first came out since she had a PS1 but I never got a chance to play it. I just watched her play it.
Lmao those people just played the PS1 version and like talking shit about the PS2 version saying It's all about graphics not the gameplay, when they haven't even actually played it lol
That was funny to watch though gameplay was more interesting on PS1 and faces of characters in PS2 as I’ve noticed are extremely ugly.
Noone is talking about how the gameplay is completely different PC PlayStation1 and PlayStation 2 are like different games
Graphics like Resident Evil 2&3
'go home to your mother potter, oh sorry you don't have one do you?'
from what i see in metacritic pc, ps1 and ps2 vers were all developed by dif studios. do the games differ very much ?
i dont think i wanna play all 3 ver to find out
oh dont forget there is also a GBC and GBA version as well. Basically GBC is a turned based RPG (though you only get to play as harry) and the GBA is all about puzzles
The PS1 feels like the original game while PS2 feels like the Remaster/Remake or whatever you may wanna call it.
Because that’s literally what they are
I didn't know there was a ps2 version of this. I only had chamber of secrets on ps2
I love both these versions. The PS1 version was my introduction to Harry Potter and one of the first games I've ever played. After that I started reading the books and watching the films. And I love the PS2 version, it's probably the best. I have an emulator for PS1 and I can play both the HP games, but unfortunately I haven't one for PS2. I really miss the first three Harry Potter PS2 games... They were the best. The PC versions are lame and boring.
whats wrong with the pc version?
You the glowup from ps1 to ps2 was nuts sheeeeeeesh
Hot Take: I actually kind of enjoyed the PS2 version.
Wow, both are completely different games. I tough ps2 version was like the ps1 remastered
the ps1 soundtrack is so good
It's literally the same in both versions
@@yrooxrksvi7142It's not. Look at the Hogwarts theme for example.
@@KingStr0ng Again, it's the exact same, except the PS2 version uses tracks from CoS too.
@@yrooxrksvi7142 No they're not the same. Did you listen to the Hogwart's themes? There completely different. That's just one of the many examples. Alot of music between the versions are either missing or changed.
@@KingStr0ng Same music, same composer, different orchestrations. The PS1 version also had more MIDI tracks. But they share more than half of the tracks.
Most of us owned the ps1 version so that's all we knew 😂
the ps1 version win only with the gigachad hagrid ps1 presence,
Hagrid is so beatiful
you cant rely without playing on a crt tv ..
I had the ps1 version as a kid but had never seen the ps2 version I thought they only made chamber of secrets and later games ps2 only so I bought the ps2 version of that game if I Would have known about the ps2 version then I probably would have waited a bit since the graphics are way superior to the ps1 version the only thing I thought was good on ps1 version was the broom flight and quidditch games the platforming could get kind of weird randomly
Soul vs Souless
ogman
Caralho a diferença entre ps1 e ps2 foi muito maior do que ps3 para ps4. Minha nossa.
I really prefer the ps1 versions, they're funnier.
I don’t have the ps1 but my ps2 version looks completely different then that
Psx have primitive charm to it 😍.
So they are different. Sorry I've played only the pc version of the games
PS1, PS2, PC they are all different games. It's kinda crazy how many versions of this game were developed
@@khroxas thanks
EL PELUCAS SAPE!!!
Ps2♥
IT’s philosopher stone
I like more PS1 version... despite ps 1 version loses in graphics
Soul soulless
Since I grew up with the PS1 version, I think that the PS2 version is a bit off with the visuals and the voice actors. That's just me though.
Ps2 tem mas grafico mas o de ps1 é um jogo melhor e mas divertido só quem zerou vai saber.
PS1 was better. It was more fun and there was more to do. PS2 looks better yeah, but it felt so empty
PS2 Version >>>>>>>>>>> PS1/PC
ps1 hagrid
PS1 version feels way better ✌
I prefer ps1 version
I think we can all see witch one is supperior version here
PS2
The difference is ABSURD !!!
Ah cê tá de Zuera né?
PS2 voices were terrible!
Should have been same voice actors!
The PS2 version graphically is a weak game in the console but wins over PS1.
Some model faces and some textures in the background look PS1 quality, that's why I never had an special attraction for these games, people only know Harry for the movies and books, that were more accesible and translated to more languages.
Ps2 version of Harry potter are all crap the only versions are ps1 and pc