That's fitting. I wouldn't put it past Han to just land on the Enterprise. Sulu and chekov are looking for it everywhere, he just comes up in taps on the bridge window.
I have been wondering, if the original and refit constitution were to have a captain's yacht, would a saucer shape ship the size of the Falcon be the yacht?
@@Gaelic-Spirit That brings up a pint I've been wondering. Once the captain's yacht has been launched, there's an empty space where it had been, so wouldn't that open up a weak spot even with a force field? If so, why include it into the design?
Half Screen did an internal floor by floor view for the Constitution, original and refit. Bigger than most would've guessed for sure, and not as small either.
Not really, it’s 22 decks tall and has a crew of 420 people. The saucer is 7 decks tall. If you assume that 2/3 is the crew is on decks 3-6 (off duty, in the crew quarters) that’s 70 people per deck.
There are few ships in Star Trek that could rival the Imperial-II Star Destroyers in size; those few are the D-Deridex Warbird, the Jem'Hadar Dreadnought Cruisers, the Vengeance-Class Dreadnought, Scimitar-Class Warbird, the Krenim Temporal Incursion Starship, the Son'a Collector, the Husnock Warship, the Voth Bulwark, and the Kazon Predator Class Starships.
@@Captainrexoutrankseverything Yes, but those are outsized and even larger; I was referring specifically to the ships that were about the same size as the Imperial II Star Destroyers, which is what I meant by "rival in size."
@kimpoy434 Again, what I said earlier: The Universe-Class Starship is outsized and much larger than the Imperial II Star Destroyer. The Intel Dreadnought-Class USS Vengeance is indeed equal in size...which is what I meant by "rival in size."
Not really. Imperial Star Destroyers, the Millennium Falcon and the Death Star are all WAAAAY more iconic - and just more interesting to look at. Most Star Trek ships look awkward and un-sleek by comparison. A metal hamburger with two sausages hanging off the back on a couple of kebab skweres.
@@AndoCommando1000 I assume you are joking, sir. If not, then I will say that you are entitled to your opinion. And I am also entitled to mine. You are misinformed. 'Twas the Millenium Falcon that was, in fact, based on a hamburger, complete with an olive sticking out of it. (the radar dish.) This is a fact as stated by George Lucas himself. The Enterprise, and subsequently all other Federation ships, was designed by Matt Jeffries, an aircraft engineer, while the Star Wars ships were based on lunch meat and vegetables.
Well like everything, it's all in the eye of the beholder. Even though George Lucas said it's based on a hamburger, to me it doesn't look even remotely like one. Looks like a techno-futuristic used fantasy adaptation of a flying saucer. To me, Star Trek ships have always looked awkward and unasethetic, makes no difference to me one bit whether they were designed by an aircraft engineer or not, they don't LOOK good@@danarseti
Setting aside that they’re not to scale, both ships are iconic and have created a legacy through the decades that have defined sci-fi and sci-fan to millions of fans across the globe.
Wonder how big the Delta Flyer is next to the Falcon, after all the Intrepid isn't much bigger than a Constitution, the Flyer could launch from and park in an Intrepid - Voyager - no problem. Also, how big the Runabout is next either the Flyer or the Falcon.
By Logical scale, the Enterprise D, E, and F would all be more than a match for an Imperial I on their own. The F of course, could probably take on the Imperial II class. Meanwhile, the Enterprise J would be able to take on a superstar destroyer.
That is the old ST: TOS Constitution class NCC-1701. Even that Enterprise had defensive shields. It also packed anti-matter photon torpedos and phasers that made laser weapons look like a little fart.
You're probably correct, but the scale doesn't feel right. My impression is coming from the interiors. The Millennium Falcon felt more cozy, compact in the movies, where as the NCC1701 felt bigger, roomier in the television series. Five people and two droids bumping into one another vs 410 crew with private cabins and lots of corridors, meeting rooms, labs and so forth.
Very cool! Nice to see the 2 together! I read they are both 1/ 350th scale. That being said, the Enterprise "Bridge" comfortably held 10 people with room to walk around. The Falcon "Cockpit" could fit 5-6 in a squeeze( Provided of course you kept pushing 3PO to the back lol). The sizing just doesn't seem right to me but maybe I'm being too critica,l either way very cool thanks again for posting! Cheers.
The sizing is not correct. The Millennium Falcon is 34.75 meters long compared to the Enterprise which was 288.6 meters long. This means the Enterprise was roughly 12 times longer than the Falcon. In the video, it’s only around 6 times longer.
Yeah, the Enterprise is a lot smaller than people think. To be fair the true size of the Falcon is inconsistent even in the movies, with the exterior sets being smaller than the internal sets, but anyway these are both 1/350 scale so it's good enough for me.
@@maxdefire Why? From what was seen, it's flimsy looking and frankly, ugly to boot as well. Original through E are better looking ones, with Refit/A being the best.
The Millennium Falcon is rather comparable in length to a Danube-Class Runabout. The Defiant-Class is roughly about the same size as the saucer section of a Constitution-Class Starship.
I know this is a joke but if they faced one another the enterprise would wipe the millenium Falcon before the falcon even got into range and if plot armour existed the sensors on the enterprise can scan the ship itself for intruders so….
I have a shirt that says "Divided Allegiance" that has half of the overhead profile of each ship, but I'm starting to think that shirt is a lie because the Falcon is as long as the Enterprise on the shirt...
No it never had phaser bank details. It usually just shot both phasers and torpedoes from the lower dome detail. Later blueprints included phaser banks but they never appeared on the actual filming model.
I don't think that's quite right. But it's probably pretty close. The Enterprise is smaller than people think it is. Controversially, the Enterprise D is bigger than people think it is.
Depending on which source you look up the Constitution Class is stated to be 290 meters in length (some quoted 288) with the diameter of the primary hull being 126 meters (not the refit diameter of 142). The Falcon is stated to be 34.75 meters at her longest point. So roughly 3.5 Falcons would fit end to end on a Constitution Classes saucer section. This looks pretty damn close.
@@twogungunnar9456 I definitely agree. While I was quoting "cannon" figures the interior and exterior of the Constitution Class has the same Dr. Who effect as the shuttlecraft does. The exterior model made had a internal height of roughly 5.5 feet while the interior set piece could accommodate Mr. Nimoy standing and he was 6.0 feet.
I have been wondering, *if* the original and refit constitution were to have a captain's yacht, would a saucer shape ship the size of the Falcon be the yacht?
Star trek ships pack a far more powerful punch than their star wars counterparts. Tho nobody's ever done an Imperial versus Dominion.. or separatist versus the dominion weirdly enough
I don’t really know about that. Besides, the Star Trek guys would be dead before they ever meet because how slow warp speed is compared to Hyperspace lol
@@UnidentifiedGecko hyperspace only works so fast because slower ships planned every single route and thus they have hyperlanes like a interstate highway which is safe to traverse. Besides the federation could easily translate over hyper space tech and the navigation computers and thus combine both warp and hyperspace together
@modelchili Years ago, there was a debate on whether or not the falcon could bear the Enterprise. It's an old debate but it got pretty heated. I apologize if my comment sounded mean. The video itself is pretty awesome.
With the right mix of chronoton particles, worm holes, and time travel gone wrong, it could happen. Crew of 428 vs 2. Enterprise was a cruiser, not battleship
Han Solo, can out fly and out run the Enterprise and fly out of a Black Hole. With no trouble at all. And look how small his ship is, If his engines are that small the Technology is so much advance.
That theme always brings a smile to my face.
That's fitting. I wouldn't put it past Han to just land on the Enterprise. Sulu and chekov are looking for it everywhere, he just comes up in taps on the bridge window.
I have been wondering, if the original and refit constitution were to have a captain's yacht, would a saucer shape ship the size of the Falcon be the yacht?
@@whitewolf3051 At the thickest part of the saucer, it could probably fit a captain's yacht with 2 floors without creating too much of a weak spot.
@@Gaelic-Spirit That brings up a pint I've been wondering. Once the captain's yacht has been launched, there's an empty space where it had been, so wouldn't that open up a weak spot even with a force field? If so, why include it into the design?
Real Trek had electronic screens built into the bridge wall. No dumb bridge window.
@@Gunnar001I was going to say there is no window on the Enterprise.
They really packed those crew members in.
Each crew member is able to have personal quarters the size of an RV in the saucer section of the Enterprise.
Half Screen did an internal floor by floor view for the Constitution, original and refit. Bigger than most would've guessed for sure, and not as small either.
" Dint worry Captain , we'll leave that beasty in th dust." Mr.Scott.
" Hyper drive.......check, here goes nothing." Han Solo. 😂
Not much different than naval ships.
Not really, it’s 22 decks tall and has a crew of 420 people. The saucer is 7 decks tall. If you assume that 2/3 is the crew is on decks 3-6 (off duty, in the crew quarters) that’s 70 people per deck.
Then realize just how huge the Star Destroyer is by comparison, the ENterprise is basically the size of an ISD bridge tower.
There are few ships in Star Trek that could rival the Imperial-II Star Destroyers in size; those few are the D-Deridex Warbird, the Jem'Hadar Dreadnought Cruisers, the Vengeance-Class Dreadnought, Scimitar-Class Warbird, the Krenim Temporal Incursion Starship, the Son'a Collector, the Husnock Warship, the Voth Bulwark, and the Kazon Predator Class Starships.
@@user-roninwolf1981you forgot the Borg cubes and stuff
@@Captainrexoutrankseverything
Yes, but those are outsized and even larger; I was referring specifically to the ships that were about the same size as the Imperial II Star Destroyers, which is what I meant by "rival in size."
You haven't seen the Enterprise J or Dreadnought class yet
@kimpoy434
Again, what I said earlier:
The Universe-Class Starship is outsized and much larger than the Imperial II Star Destroyer. The Intel Dreadnought-Class USS Vengeance is indeed equal in size...which is what I meant by "rival in size."
😊In all of science fiction, the USS Enterprise 1701 should be considered iconic above all science fiction starships!!!!!!!
Preach it, Brother.
Not really. Imperial Star Destroyers, the Millennium Falcon and the Death Star are all WAAAAY more iconic - and just more interesting to look at.
Most Star Trek ships look awkward and un-sleek by comparison. A metal hamburger with two sausages hanging off the back on a couple of kebab skweres.
@@AndoCommando1000 I assume you are joking, sir. If not, then I will say that you are entitled to your opinion. And I am also entitled to mine. You are misinformed. 'Twas the Millenium Falcon that was, in fact, based on a hamburger, complete with an olive sticking out of it. (the radar dish.) This is a fact as stated by George Lucas himself. The Enterprise, and subsequently all other Federation ships, was designed by Matt Jeffries, an aircraft engineer, while the Star Wars ships were based on lunch meat and vegetables.
@@AndoCommando1000I would say the falcon or x wing
Well like everything, it's all in the eye of the beholder. Even though George Lucas said it's based on a hamburger, to me it doesn't look even remotely like one. Looks like a techno-futuristic used fantasy adaptation of a flying saucer.
To me, Star Trek ships have always looked awkward and unasethetic, makes no difference to me one bit whether they were designed by an aircraft engineer or not, they don't LOOK good@@danarseti
Setting aside that they’re not to scale, both ships are iconic and have created a legacy through the decades that have defined sci-fi and sci-fan to millions of fans across the globe.
Looks like both kits are the 1/350 versions.
If they're not to scale perfectly they're pretty close. The Enterprise is 288 meters long and the Falcon is 35
So, while it can't fit in the Connie's Shuttle bay, it would be able to fit in the Galaxy Class's Main Shuttle Bay, right?
Yeah for sure.
Wonder how big the Delta Flyer is next to the Falcon, after all the Intrepid isn't much bigger than a Constitution, the Flyer could launch from and park in an Intrepid - Voyager - no problem. Also, how big the Runabout is next either the Flyer or the Falcon.
@@whitewolf3051 delta flyer is about 1/3 smaller than a runabout. And a runabout is about the same length as the falcon. But obviously much narrower.
@@yonumpty So the Delta Flyer *could* fit inside at least a refit constitution, but a runabout *would* be too big even for a refit connie.
@@whitewolf3051 i would say a runabout could fit in the refit
I think the original enterprise would be able to go toe to toe against a victory class star destroyer, and no, I'm not joking.
By Logical scale, the Enterprise D, E, and F would all be more than a match for an Imperial I on their own.
The F of course, could probably take on the Imperial II class.
Meanwhile, the Enterprise J would be able to take on a superstar destroyer.
I think that a B’rel could win against a SSD. They have a lot of weaknesses that a fast moving ship like the Bird of Prey can exploit.
What about imperial victory II
IT WOULD BE HAULED AWAY AS GARBAGE, U MEAN
@@scimbrelo English please? A single A-wing took a single ssd down
That is the old ST: TOS Constitution class NCC-1701. Even that Enterprise had defensive shields. It also packed anti-matter photon torpedos and phasers that made laser weapons look like a little fart.
You aren't shit,en if they thought the enterprise was bad to deal with let them deal with the Miranda class oh God right!
@@JamesLoch-ky3un Are You sure you aren't confused? It seems to me we are on the same side
The Falcon can probably fit in the Enterprise-D's main shuttle bay, back of the saucer section
Damn Han Solo, Captain Kirk says where's Solo ship is at? 😂
This Brings out the Inner Child in all of us !
The enterprise refit/A is my favorite out of all the ships. This one’s close enough though to still be awesome.
The Falcon would look cool with the Galileo in its mandibles.
You're probably correct, but the scale doesn't feel right. My impression is coming from the interiors. The Millennium Falcon felt more cozy, compact in the movies, where as the NCC1701 felt bigger, roomier in the television series. Five people and two droids bumping into one another vs 410 crew with private cabins and lots of corridors, meeting rooms, labs and so forth.
Dammit Jim one of the shuttles is on deck 3.😂
YESSSSIR STAR TREK BI### LONG LIVE TO STAR TREK AND NO THAT BABY SHOW
Cool! Yeh, the Enterprise isn't as big as you'd think.
The orginal yes but they get bigger.
uss entprise J
that one is too utterly gigantic for its own good@@JoshDHelton2006
@@Lightning7112 i wand like to seea show whit it tho
Not the original but the JJ version is almost as big as the D.
🖖😎👍Very cool and very nicely well done indeed!.
Very cool! Nice to see the 2 together! I read they are both 1/ 350th scale. That being said, the Enterprise "Bridge" comfortably held 10 people with room to walk around. The Falcon "Cockpit" could fit 5-6 in a squeeze( Provided of course you kept pushing 3PO to the back lol). The sizing just doesn't seem right to me but maybe I'm being too critica,l either way very cool thanks again for posting! Cheers.
The sizing is not correct. The Millennium Falcon is 34.75 meters long compared to the Enterprise which was 288.6 meters long. This means the Enterprise was roughly 12 times longer than the Falcon. In the video, it’s only around 6 times longer.
Idk why people are saying these aren't to scale, if you look at the comparative size of a human against each vehicle it's consistent
Yeah, the Enterprise is a lot smaller than people think. To be fair the true size of the Falcon is inconsistent even in the movies, with the exterior sets being smaller than the internal sets, but anyway these are both 1/350 scale so it's good enough for me.
Man, those are nice. And yes, Han would definitely land on the Enterprise.
Yes, but the Enterprise would know he's there. The ship has windows and people with the sense to look out them.
Now do real time Star destroyer to Enterprise
Which Enterprise, the larger D, E, F, or the Original/Refit?
@@whitewolf3051 Yes is the only appropriate answer here.
@@whitewolf3051 J
@@maxdefire Why? From what was seen, it's flimsy looking and frankly, ugly to boot as well. Original through E are better looking ones, with Refit/A being the best.
@@whitewolf3051 just because of it's size so ISD wouldn't be uncontested.
I love it
For a second, I thought you were low-key flexing a Tomy, but I was wrong.
Ben Kenobi after landing, "That's no space port (to land the Millennium Falcon)!" ... Death Star "That's no moon!"
So my dream fantasy spaceship arrangement of Enterprise D with Millennium Falcon in the shuttle bay would definitely work then, good to know!
Now do USS Enterprise CV6 vs U.S.S Enterprise NCC-1701
The Millennium Falcon is rather comparable in length to a Danube-Class Runabout. The Defiant-Class is roughly about the same size as the saucer section of a Constitution-Class Starship.
And yet, I know Han could take on the Enterprise, and then discreetly land on the underside and dissapear from sensors.
I know this is a joke but if they faced one another the enterprise would wipe the millenium Falcon before the falcon even got into range and if plot armour existed the sensors on the enterprise can scan the ship itself for intruders so….
Uss enterprise vs Home one
Based on the cockpit of the falcon I think the Enterprise should be a little bigger.
The falcon died unless it runs away.....really fast
Não imaginava que é tão grande.
Lindas naves espacial.❤
I would say the Falcon is about the size of a Runabout
Beautiful!!!
At 105’ the falcon loos a lil big compared to 947’
Still impressive models tho
I have a shirt that says "Divided Allegiance" that has half of the overhead profile of each ship, but I'm starting to think that shirt is a lie because the Falcon is as long as the Enterprise on the shirt...
2 circle space ships UFO shape
Have to pick Captain Kirk's ship.
BullyBilly
Ah, that Falcon looks just like mine - she’s from Hot Wheels, am I right?
No this is one of the Bandai model kits
Yeah the enterprise is much smaller than I thought
That’s about what it would actually look like.
Didn't it have top mounted phaser banks also? Cause I can't see them.
No it never had phaser bank details. It usually just shot both phasers and torpedoes from the lower dome detail. Later blueprints included phaser banks but they never appeared on the actual filming model.
I don't think that's quite right. But it's probably pretty close. The Enterprise is smaller than people think it is. Controversially, the Enterprise D is bigger than people think it is.
I have a similar pic with the K'Tinga.
Nicely done. Looks good. Can you do the Falcon against the D or E class? I know the C was much smaller than them.
The Enterprise D at this scale would be 6ft long, a bit big!
Depending on which source you look up the Constitution Class is stated to be 290 meters in length (some quoted 288) with the diameter of the primary hull being 126 meters (not the refit diameter of 142). The Falcon is stated to be 34.75 meters at her longest point. So roughly 3.5 Falcons would fit end to end on a Constitution Classes saucer section. This looks pretty damn close.
Whoever came up with the 290 meter measurement got it wrong. There's just no way the interior as-seen would fit. It should be at least 350-450.
@@twogungunnar9456 I definitely agree. While I was quoting "cannon" figures the interior and exterior of the Constitution Class has the same Dr. Who effect as the shuttlecraft does. The exterior model made had a internal height of roughly 5.5 feet while the interior set piece could accommodate Mr. Nimoy standing and he was 6.0 feet.
Star Trek is bigger faster stronger. No traslating all that all of that is true.
That is a very Han Solo thing to do ngl
Also nice models you got there
I dont think the Falcon's cockpit was the size of the Enterprise bridge...
I have been wondering, *if* the original and refit constitution were to have a captain's yacht, would a saucer shape ship the size of the Falcon be the yacht?
What size is that uss enterprise model kit
1701 is iconic, legend, place of honor above all others... but it's not an attractive ship. Product if it's era.
nostalgic overload anomaly detected
Why are you comparing apples too oranges? Those are 2 different classes of ships.
Ok where can I get that mini falcon
Almost, needs to be 0.5x smaller
now put it up to the enterprise D.. I bet there isn’t a model big enough for that 😂
And couple k crue in that size dish???
Secondo me questi due modelli sono fuori scala tra loro: la Enterprise dovrebbe essere almeno il doppio, in dimensioni!
Star trek ships pack a far more powerful punch than their star wars counterparts. Tho nobody's ever done an Imperial versus Dominion.. or separatist versus the dominion weirdly enough
I don’t really know about that. Besides, the Star Trek guys would be dead before they ever meet because how slow warp speed is compared to Hyperspace lol
@@UnidentifiedGecko hyperspace only works so fast because slower ships planned every single route and thus they have hyperlanes like a interstate highway which is safe to traverse. Besides the federation could easily translate over hyper space tech and the navigation computers and thus combine both warp and hyperspace together
Cool
That's not in scale. The falcon should be smaller.
Wait, this debate still goes on? I thought it was over.
What debate? It's just a scale comparison
@modelchili Years ago, there was a debate on whether or not the falcon could bear the Enterprise. It's an old debate but it got pretty heated. I apologize if my comment sounded mean. The video itself is pretty awesome.
ENTERPRİSE is NUMBER ONE!
Wait till this kid sees the Death Star
@@UnidentifiedGeckowait till you learn the enterprise can solo the Death Star
@@CASA-dy4vs Until Vader just uses the force to stop them in place and has the Death Star just blast it lmao
@@UnidentifiedGecko nah, Star Trek ships have ranges of about 5 million kilometers away so the force wouldn’t do shit
@@UnidentifiedGecko nah, Star Trek ships have ranges of about 5 million kilometers away so the force wouldn’t do sht
how big is it?
With the right mix of chronoton particles, worm holes, and time travel gone wrong, it could happen.
Crew of 428 vs 2. Enterprise was a cruiser, not battleship
I think the Enterprise is much bigger than
Ehh more like Exactly the same size as the Enterprise’s Bridge Module maybe even a it smaller, or with Connie Refit class but 🥹
But: super star destroyer
v'ger
and the borg
Isd vs USS interprise
One photon and its byeee chewee lol 😆
Nice work, next, enterprise Vs smallest 40k ship.....
Not to scale. But fun.
Both are 1/350 scale
Error está en el 0iso😅
Han Solo, can out fly and out run the Enterprise and fly out of a Black Hole. With no trouble at all. And look how small his ship is, If his engines are that small the Technology is so much advance.
Maybe in Hyperspace, but at sublight, the Falcon is not outrunning nor outmaneuvering the Enterprise.
Not so accurate but near 😊
What scale? 1:500?
1/350 scale
Falcon is too big
Both are 1/350 scale
Its half the size
An imperial star destroyer would kick the enterprises ass
Ya probably
Not really. The Enterprise can torpedo the deflector globes, then carve up the Star Destroyer w/her phasers.
@@captainpharaohStar Destroyers have Tie Fighters though
Nx 01 could still whip its ass
Porthos > Kirk
that's literally not to scale.
They're both 1/350 scale, about as literal as you can get.
this version is mad ugly. 2009 enterprise was wayyy better
What a piece of junk!! But just look at the Falcon.
se que ni yo ni mis bisnietos vamos a poder verlo, pero espero que un día la humanidad pueda crear la enterprise
Pretty sure the enterprise would be much larger in comparison to the falcon than this.
They're both 1/350 scale. The original Enterprise is a lot smaller than people think it seems. It's shorter than most super carriers are today.
Not TOS version. It was a lot smaller than later versions.
yeah now compare it with USS Enterprise-J