2023 KIA Ceed 1.5 T-GDi acceleration 0-100, 1/4 mile, 60-100, 80-120 | facelift | FWD | GPS results
Vložit
- čas přidán 12. 07. 2023
- 2023 KIA Ceed 1.5 T-GDi
1.5L 4-cyl turbo petrol
160hp & 253Nm
7-speed DCT automatic
FWD
16-inch wheels
weight: 1.360 kg
claimed 0-100: 8.6 sec
00:01 car presentation
00:25 launch & car stats
00:46 60-100 km/h
01:06 80-120 km/h
01:32 0-100 km/h (x2)
02:13 1/4 mile (x2)
03:06 speedo vs GPS
03:16 results sheet - Auta a dopravní prostředky
As highlighted in the results table, this KIA has better acceleration times than it's 2 direct competitors i've tested so far (Hyundai i30 and Audi A3). The important thing to mention here is that the Hyundai i30 and the Audi A3 were tested during winter time, in less than ideal conditions (high humidity, slightly damp asphalt) and with the cars on winter tires, while the KIA was tested in good conditions.
Overall which car felt best to you?
@@skeed.5768 For the dynamics/acceleration aspect, the KIA. For interior build quality and overall feel, the Audi. But these choices are made with a small margin over the other variants, and with some objective and subjective factors (trim level, personal preference, less memories for the cars tested a longer time back, etc.). I could not say there's a clear winner between the 3.
👍Thank you for this video !
What can i say... Thank you for your comment! ✌️
👌👌👌
Thanks man, glad you liked it!
Goid work
Thoinks! 😀
Very nice performance from KIA! How would you comapre it with i30 in the other aspects like steering and comfort?
Fair question! Unfortunately, a difficult one for me to answer, the main reason being that it's been half a year since i drove the i30, so the impression the KIA gave me is a lot fresher in my mind, which could give me bias towards it. I remember the day i drove the Hyundai was gloomy and kinda wet so i didn't push it around corners. Interior quality wise i'd say there's little to no difference between them. From the dynamics pov i think i just might give it to the KIA, probably because it's a few dozens of kilos lighter.
There's no yellow Ceed in my country :(
Salut, ar fi de folos sa faci acel spreadsheet public, in special pentru noi, tocilarii de timpi 🤓
Salut, mersi pt comment! Am primit mai multe "indemnuri" in privinta asta, probabil se va intampla chestia asta in scurt timp ;) Daca te intereseaza (si) alte date suplimentare, spune si poate ti le pot oferi, din inregistrarile device-ului. 🖖
@@AcceleratingCars Nu ma intereseaza timpii pentru o masina anume, imi place doar sa fac comparatii si sa raman surprins de 'vecinii' unor masini din clasament. Nu am mai vazut pana acum un spreadsheet cu masini normale si reprize asa scurte, d-aia mi s-ar parea interesat de analizat tot. Si cei de la autotopnl au un asemenea document, insa cu masini performante, care este de referinta pentru pasionatii de statistici auto: docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1YI-Q8I_rjruFLja2AU448NsNX6hCU5JQKp_4mdUR9VQ/edit#gid=0
Hi, I don't know how is possible but I have the same car with the same engine, the only difference is that my car has the GT Line segment, and my 0-100 is 7.4s and my 0-160 is 18.3s.
I have take the time using the app "car timer", so it is really possibile that my crono is not 100% accurate due to the mobile phone GPS (it's not a professional chrono), but I still think that my car perform 0-100 under 8s...
Is the Gt having a higher speced engine that has 207hp instead of 160?
@@x0x0xxxx68 The GT is faster, but I have the 160hp
@@davide6929 I cannot speak by experience but 7,4sec sounds faster than 160hp should get you.
After some short researches, 7,4sec is the time that Kia advertises for the GT
1.6 T-GDI DCT with 204 horsepower which is also confirmed by some independant tests.
So I think, you measuring is off, or you really mistake your 160HP engine for the 204HP one. I dunno.
Anyway, I hope you have fun with your car.
@@x0x0xxxx68 I can guarantee that I have the 160hp, and I agree that my time isn't precise, it's too quick for my engine. Anyway it's pretty funny to drive, it's quick enough :)
On CZcams I have seen people doing 7.9s with the 1.5L, no one has done better
Hi, thanks for your comment! First of all, i think that the GT Line is just a superior trim level, it does not come with higher power level. The official figures for this 1.5 engine are 8.5, 8.6 sec to 100. Finally, just using common sense, i think 160hp are hardly enough to get you under 8 sec, especially if the gearbox does not allow you to build boost by breaking.
Are reprize foarte bune.
Asa e 😉 cutia nu permite un start in forta maxima, dar odata pusa in miscare, accelereaza binisor. Na, 160cp pe
@@AcceleratingCars Da, făceam comparația cu mașina mea care are 184 cp și 1500 kg. Accelerația la a mea pana la 100 e cam cu aproape o secundă mai rapida, dar reprizele sunt mult mai apropiate.
@@Seba03111976 Pai probabil ca masina ta iti permite sa faci brake boost sau are o forma de launch control si astfel are startul (0-60) mai bun. 184cp la 1.5 tone, ce ar putea fi...? 🤔 Honda Civic? 😀
@@AcceleratingCarsMercedes C200 cu cutie manuala 😁
@@Seba03111976 Pe'aproape, ce sa zic :)) s-ar putea sa urmeze un c200 2019, dar automat, in curand 😉