When is it Legal to Kill?
VloĆŸit
- Äas pĆidĂĄn 31. 01. 2021
- Killing can be deemed justifiable in self defense, but some places you will have to try harder than others to get a judge and jury to believe you! What is this gray area of the law when killing is justified? Check out today's new video to find out when it is actually legal to kill someone.
đ SUBSCRIBE TO THE INFOGRAPHICS SHOW âș czcams.com/users/theinfograp...
đ MY SOCIAL PAGES
TikTok âș / theinfographicsshow
Discord âș / discord
Facebook âș / theinfographicsshow
Twitter âș / theinfoshow
đ SUGGEST A TOPIC
www.theinfographicsshow.com
đ SOURCES:pastebin.com/dmxsd1dJ
All videos are based on publicly available information unless otherwise noted.
"You valued your property more than their life!"
They also valued my property more than their own life.
Well said. They knew they could die while breaking in.
Dang
i was coming to the comments to say this but you got it first
Roses are red grasses are green he knew the consequences of stepping on your land so green now he gonna get dropped by your glock 17
Carlos! đ
"But he doesn't call the cops, instead, he grabs his samurai sword"
That's one way to open up a video
Yez
While you called the cops I studied the blade
@@thedannydimes đ , i suppose, since they're cops themselves
Where some people live, the cops are 30 mins away.
Plot twist: Heâs a reincarnated samurai
This is ridiculous. Everyone has the right to self defense regardless of weapon or any of that bs
Every case besides the case with the Asian dude was justifiable. But the Asian dude obviously wasnât a threat and the dude that shot him deserves to go to jail
Literally the video was made to explain why sometimes itâs not wtf you talking about
It's a little more complicated than that, nuance doesn't seem to be your strong suit.
the vide was made to make you understand the entire thing mate.
In the us, yes you do. Defining self defense is then the problem.
âThe burglar ATTACKS the man.â
âWas the killing justifiable? Not so easy to answer is it?â
You literally just said he attacked the homeowner and the homeowner defended himself. You actually literally defined self defense.
I know right
You know there's a difference between incapacitating and killing right?
@@Bricknick98 thatâs not remotely relevant. The question was whether or not killing the man was legally justifiable and the answer is yes. The burglar chose to attack and suffered the consequences of his actions. Besides which, America has a long history of home invaders successfully suing homeowners because they were injured after breaking in. More importantly, trying to disable and restrain an armed attacker would have exposed him to unnecessary risk.
Iâm sorry but reality isnât like a superhero comic where the bad guys just get beat up. If he hadnât killed the assailant, heâd be dead himself. He was entirely justified. End of discussion.
Welcome to Europe where criminals have more rights that law abiding citizens
@@Projolo that happens in America too, except they're called police.
Government: I'm watching you, better be self-defense.
lol
109th
The government offs people all the time. Is that legal? Lol
@@andrewg136 depends on how you look at it. From one perspective, they should be persecuted for it, from another, they are the law, who's to say what they did is illegal?
@@andrewg136 like waco or ruby ridge...
Robber: *Enters house*
Texas: You've yee'd your last haw
113 likes and no replys? Let me fix that
Lol
Basically
Faxxxx
pretty much most of the US, not just texas
You need to be a special kind of someone to believe two kids in costumes that rang your doorbell on Halloween are a threat. How do you not connect the dots is beyond me.
"Hmmm they arrived here, on Halloween, in costumes. Must be a threat!"
I guess they got a trick instead of a treat... ill show myself my way out
It's not like they even broke in either... They literally just rang the door bell. Like wtf.
Pssh, obviously they had a pistol in their trick or treat baskets /j
Wow I didnât know Halloween was on October 17th. đ€Šđ»
The second scenario, the man should be charged of murdering a man, for they were unthreatening, and since they were probably nowhere near his house, he is guilty
I don't believe it gave us enough information for us to determine whether or not individual was in their house. I believe we should hear a more detailed description of the actual scenario before coming to a conclusion. If the person was approaching them and walking into their house, it is possible that the castle doctrine would stand in the case. I'm not saying I agree with it, but them's the breaks.
@@tangoromeo9477 literally the man was outside there house in customs . Have u never had a person ring ur doorbell before ? Does that make u go into insane panic and pull out ur gun ?? The wife was weird to call her husband down with his gun and the husband was weird from being so comfortable with shooting someone that was obviously not a threat , outside there house , and didnât look or seemed armed . They was dressed up in costumes for goodness sake . But I wouldnât be surprised since jay was in 1992 , that it had to be racially motivated for him being a Asian guy .
@@dejaxyz311 have you never heard of people trying to force their way into your house utilizing an excuse? One tactic back in the 90s for criminals was to knock on someone's door claiming something innocuous. They would then pressure the homeowner by slowly moving into the house while talking to them. Then after stepping through the doorway they would close the door behind them and do whatever it was they were planning on doing in the first place.
Also, I would like to know why you think it is potentially racially-motivated. What evidence do you have to back it up? Because the woman at the door was scared of some stranger's in costumes knocking on their door and claiming that there was a party? And one of the two continues to approach the door despite the woman stating the opposite? I'm not saying there was no racially-motivated decisions, but the information that we got isn't enough to make that determination.
I personally would ask questions regarding the woman at the door. Why did she not close the door and lock it? Did they block the door? Did they knock multiple times trying to get in? Was there anything in addition to the two persons presence that motivated the woman to contact her husband?
There's far more that we need to understand before we can make a determination. That determination shouldn't be made off of a cartoon clip that only told the story from the Duo's perspective. In order to understand the full story we also need the homeowners perspective. Then you take the evidence into account, and make your determination.
Gang members: letâs get that PS5
Florida gun owners: not on my watch
Drugs are the real money maker for gangs :InsertEpicEmoji:
@@DOPESMOKERSB its a joke
yup
The quiet kid: ....................
@@aimmason4878 no way? đ§
Yes, I'm all for self defense. A wise man once told me, "I'd rather be judged by 12, than carried by 6!"
But better to work to try and not have to make that choice in the first place.
Woah dark comment!
@@geoffreyfletcher6976 people don't choose to be robbed. đ€Šđœââïž
@@geoffreyfletcher6976 yes you work to prevent it. But you are still subject to the laws of this world. Meaning you can live in a utopia in your mind, but you cant expect everyone to be peaches and sunshine. Protect yourself and stay ready so you dont have to say âi wish i wouldve.......â
@ivan Gil - roddy rich đ
Fun Fact: hydrogen peroxide is great for cleaning blood stains
You still can't cover up and traces are always left behind. Plus the police have their own special formula to find cleaned up blood. đ
I fully support castle doctrine.
As long as the intruder verbally says âI am surrenderingâ, the homeowner should have no choice but to let them go regardless of what the intruder is actually doing
@@thatonedude-6819 Nope, you're going on a tee-shirt, sport.
@@able6542 but the intruder didnât consent to being penetrated
@@thatonedude-6819 did the home owner consent to being burgled? đ
@@darienbarth3191 yea but thatâs just your feelings
Mi casa tu casa
Thief: *Steals 2 laptops*
Student: I sleep
Thief: *Steals gaming console*
Student: Katana goes brbrrbrbt
Lol
đčđčđč
STAINS OF TIME STARTS BLASTING
I've lived in the countryside most my life. If anyone pulls up my driveway unannounced I usually walk out carrying.
Learned procedure from my dad who once walked out with a shotgun to greet a pair of offroaders who accidentally came down our property looking for a trail that was nearby. They were my high-school classmates and the next week told me they nearly shat themselves lol
But living remotely, anyone who comes to my property is usually greeted with calm force. We're not right off the main road. It takes some driving down our personal road to get to us.
It's my property now and I treat it the same my father used to. If I don't know your vehicle, i assume you're either your lost or you're not here for good reason.
You know, you can game on a laptop too...
If he attacked you with a knife, isnât that justified?
Yes
You would think. The people that said he was guilty would have been terrified if a robber tried to stab them on their own property. There has to be more to that case because the home owner had no choice. That was self defense......
Yhea, but stab someone *17* times, is a LITLLE exesive, Âżdont you think?
@@srobvio9757 adrenaline.. In panic, i dont think counting how many times you stab him is in your mind. Maybe that guy still twitching after being stab 10 times that's why he stab him 7 more times just to make sure he is dead.
Society, a.k.a "PC Kingdom" says no. You need to love and accept everyone, according to society.
Stabbing someone 17 times is not over the top, its being afraid for life and just making sure
Ur weird u donât think thatâs over the top . Literally. All it takes is prolly under 5 stabs . Especially if u aim for the vital areas like they throat or heart or head . But if u constantly stabbing someone 17 times rather if they broke into ur house or not , ur a psychopath.
Change stabbing to âshotâ
@@dejaxyz311 you've clearly never had an adrenaline rush in your life
@@dejaxyz311 somebodies never been in a fight
You psychopathâŠ
My favorite thing I've learned from this video is that burgled is a word
"Not so easy to answer is it?"
Actually its a resounding yes to justified bc he was being attacked by an intruder
@amar gwari so stay off my property when uninvited
@amar gwari It was his life or the intruderâs..... and itâs in HIS home...
Sadly not all countries allows you to defend your property while it's being robbed. The thief can actual press charges for assault even if they're in the middle of robbing your house.
A farmer in my country shot a home intruder once and was locked up for use of a deadly weapon.
Very easy
I agree
Even if you don't understand the language, a gun pointed at you is the universal language that you're in trouble
Unless it's halloween and both parties are dressed up, when it's usually a toy gun or unloaded and empty as a prop
@@specialopsdave he probably assumed it was a prop
no, it is not.. different cultures.. happened in 1992... Before internet was a thing, he knew zero on the USA "f*ck everything, i have gunssss" mentality.....
Things only Americans will say in the most ridiculous situations possible
@@specialopsdave as a general rule I show anyone pointing any kind of gun at me my displeasure. Theres plenty of cases where people thought it was unloaded, a prop, toy gun, ect and shoot themselves or someone.
I honestly believe that if someone is able to defend themself and their property with lethal force then people will not attempt to rob houses and to be more careful when approaching property
I really hope before he killed the intruder he said âthat isnât a knife, this is a knifeâ
Or you brought a knife to a sword fight
"Once this sword has been drawn, it must taste blood"
Texans be like: âtoday we will see if a robber will stop a 50 cal
They literally grab their biggest weapon for these type of things too. Bat? Nope. Knife? Nope. 22 pistol? Nope 44 MAGNUM? IMMA BLOW SOME KIDS HEAD OF FOR THIS! THAT WILL SHOW THEM
@@flaqko5686 You try beating up a robber with a baseball bat. Who knows what they have on them? They could have a .44 and you wouldn't know unless you caught them, and kept your life.
@@nadanican yes I indeed will. Or better yet I'll just call the cops and instead of shootings kids for trespassing
Put a badass Texan like Jerry Miculek there and the robber will not even have the time to look menacing before being riddled with bullets.
@@flaqko5686 you could be taken hostage in the time the cops show up its better to have a gun and not need it than need a gun and not have it i hate the idea of ever hurting anybody but I would do it in self defense
At the end of the day, Iâm putting my own life above the law.
Not only that, but if there was a breakin and I killed the burglar and I stood to go to jail if I called the police, well, let's just say, I'd be saving a lot of money on cat food over the next few months. I'd also be curious what human flesh tasted like myself.
The law: oh no you don't! Not on my watch! It's prison time for you while this clearly repentant and upstanding "citizen" gets out for "good behavior".
I don't think anyone will disagree with you there. Jews like to say that the preservation of life is above all other rules, and I think that's about as simple as you need to get.
Itâs a shame we have to that, criminals have to many rights.
Think the issue becomes could you have prevented it. Like a guy breaks into my house, I could lock my 2 storey down and call the cops, you could pop out a window and do the same. Once the person is a actively coming after YOU and not your car in the garage say, the law is on your side
he broke into his house, and attempted to take away his life, there was no possible outcome in which both of the men live. so yes i do think its justified.
technically its possible one of them would just be wounded but I agree 100% with the spirit of your comment.
@@bigvinnie3 if the homeowner injured the intruder and the intruder survived it's possible that the intruder would sue him and possibly win
@@serpyl7977 he would win. Someone actually did that when they were shot with a shotgun and he won even after breaking and entering
Sometimes, the police take too much precious time, and you have to take matters into your own hands.
Someone: breaks in
Americans: you have entered pvp mode
Not all of them
Mostly Texans B)
PvP is now enabled
I mean how else are you supposed to react? "Take what u want sir."
Yes its our castle
if it's south, you better have some future tech power armor because they likely have a gattlin' gun or something
âMade the fatal mistake of going to Baton Rouge, Louisianaâ he speaking factsđ
No lie detected brođ . BR is lethal to us natives can't imagine coming from another county
Life often isnât white are black but grey
ur so right, im ashamed im from Louisiana.
Facts, rather the whole state lol
No wonder yb such a demon đđđ
this is why I love states like Idaho and Texas. stand your grounds law is a beautiful thing.
I love this channel I made a comment earlier about a touchy subject and they went ahead and addressed anyways. I literally thought they'd gloss over assisted suicide in US hospitals.
I believe that if you break in someone's home, whatever happens to you is your fault because you had no business there in the first place.
What about Yoshihiroâs case?
I've read the wiki about the incident and it was a mistake on both sides. Yoshihiro wasn't wearing contact lenses during the incident which is weird (because why would you go to a party and not wear contact lenses which is the only thing to help you see the party?) yand also thought that the gun was a prank while Peairs(the shooter) clearly wanted to apprehend them because they we're already outside the house near their car when he aimed at them with the gun. Yoshihiro's friend also didn't communicate their intentions clearly because he spoke English but they still thought that they were assailants. It's very unfortunate because the Yoshihiro could've lived if the misunderstanding was cleared sooner.
YES
@@Sugarglidergirl101 he didn't break into their house, he simply rung their doorbell, that was not justified
Affirmative!,
The jury needs to know that, if they were in the same position, where a robber tried to stab them and they didnât defend theirselves in any way or form, then they wouldnât be alive to even take part as a jury in court.
Yeah
The video seems critically wrong. I was violently robbed and defended myself with lethal force, I wasn't even in my home, but where I live IS a stand your ground state, so I have no legal obligation to retreat or not to defend myself. I neutralized 2 of the threats and the third one retreated. The police ended up catching the 2 that were trying not to bleed out and m found the other one had went home to get a gun they found him with. Self defense is part of american culture, any state not allowing it is begging for revolution and civil war.
@@jacktheripperdawson1219
Your own, seperate, personal experiences and biases don't change reality.
@@jacktheripperdawson1219
Do you mean that these *laws* are wrong, and not the video
@@WomenCallYouMoid I'm assuming its not america. Most states do authorize lethal force to defend yourself. I've had to use lethal force to defend my life before against multiple attackers but I also live in a "no duty to retreat" state. So I know at least some states allow you to use lethal force to defend yourself.
Thanks for the tips đđ
Thanks this video helped a lot!
âAccidentally killed burglarâ
He stabbed the burglar 17 times
The burglar is probably named Caesar
I'm pretty sure Caesar died and got stabbed 41 X
Was the assailant anything like Jason Voorhees? If so, it's still self-defense. I mean, if they're still moving, they can still attack you.
@@logancarter6963 no it was 23 times
haha
Gay Jul Caesar
Everyone has the right to self defense and i believe in deadly force if necessary
That's what the saying, "Use them by all means necessary," is for
Exactly. The argument exists because of the common "Love and accept everyone" trend. People with bad intentions don't deserve love.
@@huzzzer6083 get off the internet
@@huzzzer6083 yeah people stealing your flowers don't deserve any pity. shoot them
@Surya Mukherji have some mercy? Look at what happened to John Wick, he had no mercy.
I really needed this thanks
Anyone with an ounce of sense can tell that this first situation is 100 percent justifiable.
If a homeowner kills an intruder, the way I see it is not that the homeowner chose to take their life but rather they chose to forfeit their life as soon as then entered that home.
@@tijstastic2570 All real life cases will have nuance and you can go "what if" all day long. What I said is the general rule.
FBI is keeping a real close eye on this channel from now on
fr they've done where to get arrested too
Lol
Fr LMAOAOAOA
61st
They'd been looking here bro
Love it please keep going
6:59 I really like this word transition into showing the actual case afterwards.
Moral of the story: don't be an exchange student
Without knowing the laws of the host country or donât try to take peoples things or enter uninvited.
@@msgsgt Killing off a 17 year old seems reasonable for the americans
@@msgsgt Dont be an idiot and shoot people randomly
@@usmanyounas5181 wasnât randomly
@@Diego-lt4wm Unarmed intruders should have more immunity to castle doctrine but yes if the 17 year old had a gun or knife and posed to be a threat to your life then yes
If I have kids asleep upstairs then there's only one way an intruder is leaving my home, in pieces.
đ
I feel the same even without kids.
Exactly. Itâs pretty clear the judges sending people to prison for self-defense have never had their home invaded.
The smiley face on your channel just makes this comment all the better
Also would recommend maybe a dog or door alarms in case of intrusion
Burglarâs in America: has knives and guns
Burglarâs in the uk: has a screwdriver
video finna go UP
When every second matters, the police are only minutes away.
"Hold on one more second, the police should be here any minute"- dead homeowner
@@lasagna1316 "Excuse me sir, but you're going to have to put that jewelry back, and also please let my kids out of your trunk, I have called the police and they said that they will punish you for your crimes. With this in mind, I think it's quite reasonable to-"
-Dead homeowner, circa 2021, from school of hard knocks
Damndest thing is that cops who are stripped of their rights for self defense, citizens have it even worse!
My gun is faster
More like hours
i feel bad for the japanese dude he just wanted to go to a party
me too ):
Poor dude didn't deserve to be killed.
4r 4r
@@sketchyperson1234 how do you not see a gun?
@@matthewpawley3229 as he was going to a halloween party he could have thougt it was a part of a costume
Even if it's a clear case of self-defense against an armed intruder, the family of the intruder/attacker will sue the defender. Even if they know they can't win, they'll make as much legal problem for the defender, causing him to miss work (so much he might be fired) and pay huge legal costs (the plaintiffs get to sue for almost free, because we don't have the "loser pays" law).
Thatâs okay, I also know how to counter sue and I have legal insurance.
This made me flash back to the shotgun trap cases we studied in law school.
Intruder breaks in
Me: hippity hoppity your life is now my property
Only in America, unfortunate some other counties donât think the same
Eat your cereal
Thats not even funny dafuq
That is a beautifully cursed comment
@Traxter same hahahahahhahahahahahađ€Łđ€Łđđđđđđđđđđđđ„Čđ„Čđđđđđđđđđ€Șđ€Șđ€©đ€©đ„łđđđđđ đ
POV: self defense is reasonable and he was just adding to his KDR
**Dies** Match Bonus 1500+
He has a 1er KDR nowđ
Bonus xp
Imagine having a negative KDR in real life
I agree self defense is always justifiable
In my opinion if you break in to someone elseâs property with the intent of stealing, vandalizing, or causing harm in any ways. You deserve whatever happened to you. Never value someone elseâs possessions over your own life. End of story
You donât deserve to be killed.
Chill story about some dude hearing noises
*takes out his bigas sword*
well that took a dark turn pretty fast
Comments: "I would fire a warning shot."
Reality: Warning Shots are illegal and have prison sentences.
Even when your home is being broken into?
plz explain to be how a warning shot is illegal when acting in self defense. 2nd amendment states we are allowed to shoot (as long as your acting in self defense) and a warning shot can possibly make the intruder/robber think twice. You're giving the bad guy a chance to think twice so how is that illegal?
@@MegaNut6238 Yes. No such legal term as warning shots in most states. In B&W if you are not shooting at someone to stop them from causing harm then you are the one causing harm with your 'warning shot'.
@@cxptain3vil193 Look it up, most states consider warning shots "Reckless Conduct" and are classified as Misdemeanor with up to 12 months jail sentencing (Depending on the State). Texas and Georgia give jail time for warning shots and both states have many pro-gun laws. Find the laws in your State.
@@jimmyfirecracker1831 ahh I understand now, thanks for explaining.
âWe are here for the partyâ he clearly says
The husband: hippity hoppity your on my property *bang*
Hahahahahha
It get better with your profile
@@jackbright5325 Uuuuu...letâs ignore that for now
youâre*
How are you alive after the ambulance incident ?
In a perfect world I would love to defend myself against non-death-punishable crimes without killing or even permanently injuring the criminal. But we are not living in a perfect world.
In Spain you cant hit the thief when he breaks into your house, not even taking into account killing the thief
I will always wonder how the Spanish colonized massive plots of land in the Americas.
If anyone comes into my house I'd automatically be in fear for my life
if you're ready for it, I'd say they would be in fear
You: invites friend over
**friend arrives**
Friend: walks in
You: panic attack
@@doodlebob5548 *remembers you're a texan"
Yep. Me too.
I'd just curl up in a ball under my bed
"It's not that easy to answer, is it?" No it's pretty easy to answer, yes that scenario was justified and no the man in my eyes committed no crime by defending his life and home from a man who broke in to his house armed with a knife.
69 likes, nice
@@yeetuspeetus6598 ew disgusting redditor
@@jackobrien4910 i dont use reddit...
drop the fuckah
Are the states run by Democrats more likely to deny self-defense rights than the Republican states?
If someone breaks in your home and threatens you and your family you have every right to defend yourself
If someone breaks into your home in general.
I live in Texas and have been faced with this. Someone was rummaging through my back door. My wife and kids were out of town. I grabbed my gun, phone and shouted âI have a gun and Iâm calling the police!â The guy ran off. The police came and took a report and I made an alert on the neighborhood text. If the guy was say in my house, I might have acted differently. Iâd never want to shoot anyone, but do like how the laws in Texas favor the homeowner.
Imagine thinking a government wants whats best for you when they will literally throw you in jail when you defend yourself or property
The government is Not keeping our best interest safe... Its keeping its Power Safe! (and we the people are in the way)
@@maxskullic9879 - in one aspect I agree where youâre coming from, but the constitution is actually meant to protect the rights of the people
@@maxskullic9879 your philosophy is flawed in many ways. In fact, Iâll prove how. The government for American was made based around the freedom of people hints the statement âof the people, for the people.â The government nowadays also give stimulant checks in which are things keeping our best interests in mind.
@@y2oducky stimulus checks only lower the value of the dollar, harming the economy. And the US constitution was originally made for the people, but now they are doing everything possible to find loopholes around the constitution to punish innocent people and maintain power and control. They're slowly widdling down our rights and eventually it will be illegal to even own a knife, or a fork.
You keep saying government.... But you're forgetting one important detail it's people like us who often decide if they are quilts or not . I've been on several trials. And most times it's not as black and white as people think. There's soooo many grey areas decided by fine details.
usa: shoots halloween guests in their front yard
uk: *criminal walks into knife of 79 y/o homeowner*
I laughed way too hard at that sentence.
hahahah
USA đșđž: Gun owners defend ourselves and property.
Meanwhile, in the UK: Knife owners defend ourselves and our property.
Also, in the UK: *Man stabbed to death over IPod in North Britain*
Thatâs England certain countries will do differently
I said no clowns !
Depending on your state there's stand your ground and castle laws
I feel so sorry for people who got in to jail because they were protecting their house. For everyone reading this, If I tell my stroy short , my parents got very ill( one with a mental illness) because of the constant thefts occurring due to time to time. It's just the insecurity you feels when you are in your own home. I know the Theives may have their own struggles; but any good person in this earth will help them if they ask it. I wish everyone to not get robbed in there house and not to be threatened by killing there family.I just wish, If they can bring my parents back to normal. Peace for the world. Just don't be a theif
In india we use slippers to attack burglars. Some people even use broom.
Slippers? Thats more brutal then a shotgun
Interesting. Are guns allowed? India seems like a nice place.
@@carlcundiff578
Yeah, and use bricks and rocks and coconuts and glasses etc.... At least the street rats do.
(This is a joke, btw)
I suspect the burglar will be slightly more prepared to do damage to you, however. Unless you're some sort of broom fu master that is. For all I know, you know 37 ways of killing a man with a slipper.
Why are you in every video i watch
Video: âis killing him justified? Hold on because it might just be harder to answer than you thinkâ
Me: *turns intruder into a sushi roll*
simmer down, your american is showing
I live in Colombia and euthansia has been something that has been called a lot of times by people that dont like it or are against it
This is actually quite well made and not ignorant.
âHe grabbed his samurai swordâ
Lol I have seen that so many times and I haven't watched it.
He gonna do anime stuff
weeb moment
i didnt see that one coming xd
@@myself784 đ€Šđđ€đ
-"What's the difference between a terrorist base and a hospital?"
-"I don't know, I just fly the drone"
Classic Obama moment
@@tommychong3269 what's his last name?
@@San_Deep2501 Seagal
@@San_Deep2501 barack
-Obama
0:19 HE GRABS HIS SAMURAI SWORD. Sounds like Florida Man to me.
âJapanese manâ
If somebody breaks into your house with a weapon keep in mind they have a weapon for a reason so you should be able to protect your home
We here in Texas fully embrace the Castle Doctrine. My husband had to do just that in 1982.
Hope you or your husband didn't get hurt only Intruder did
âWhile you were stealing I studied the bladeâ
-Student from John Hopkins University
He was my favorite. I don't like gore but I would have liked to see how that went down
Thank you for this information i will keep this in mind the next time i see someone i don't like
Warning shots are illegal in most states. It's considered reckless use of a deadly weapon. In the state of Florida, it's actually encouraged to fire a warning shot in order to "defuse a hostile situation."
In the UK, a thief fell off the wall of a house after stealing.
Burglar/Killer: *I WOULD SUE YOU.*
Owner: Sorry....
Thanks for the funny comment, the last part of the video was pretty sad.
It reminds me of a story, where in a kingdom of stupids a wall fell on the burglar when he was stealing from a rich man, the king found the owner guilty as it had cost a life of someone. the owner passed the guilt onto the builder and builder onto a lady who was supposed to be distracting him while he was building the wall, the lady to the goldsmith because he wasn't giving her the gold (that she bought) and she had to make continues trips to him and the Smith to the owner as it whose marriage he was making the jewelry for instead of the lady's. And then instead of the owner another person was executed because the owner was too thin for the stake
Owner: Better pray they bring a ouija board to the stand
Infographics:When is it legal to steal?
Robbers: All the time.
Crazy people: Yes
Me, an intellectual: No
Let's see how much subscribers i can get from commenting
Current subscribers: 400đ
@@sujeet1979 I donât think anyone wouldâve subscribed after you made that generic attention seeking comment, if you made a regular comment or a funny one maybe you would get more
England: if it involves tea.
USAmerica: OOOIIIIIILLLSSSSSSS REEEEEEEEEE
Serbia: anyone that isn't Serbs
China: shhhhhhh đ€«
Plot twist:You are Robber
@@laserpoint3741 youâre a haterrrr
The first one was ABSOLUTELY ok i would be outraged if he was charged
Law still expects two parties to seek better for themselves. Theft of property isn't punishable by death. Neglecting to phone law enforcement? There are plenty of opportunities out there. Better yourself.
Still don't know why families of the intruders call you a monster for defending your own family and shooting or stabing the intruder when they have a weapon themselves
Rotten is the seed that festers the weed. People donât break into other peopleâs houses with an innate sense of entitlement towards other peoples property. Entitled burglars tend to have entitled parents and family, with quite of few of them have parents with some sort of criminal record.
if he atacked him with a knife then he defended him self with a sword by killing him SELF DEFENSE
Why donât you say it louder for the people in the back?
Well to be fair he brought a sword to a knife fight so he should have had a handicap like a broken leg or something
@@doodlebob5548 reach advantage And it was probably all he had.
@@ahandgrenade3640 i wasn't being serious
If someone breaks into my house they now value my stuff over there life. That's why I have a couple guns
Americans b like
@@diya1801 Only the 'muricans think that way
"Guns goes brrrtth"
Be glad that you are allowed to have that in my country any form of firearms is banned no matter what
Have a 9MM. 3 magazines x 15 rounds.
That is depends on the countries or states though. Like in some countries or state, killing as in self defense is justified while in some other countries or states, killing is never an excused at all and can end you up with harsh penalties.
I live in south carolina and a friend of a friend was the victim of a home invasion. 3 guys broke in and they went after his girlfriend. He shot at them, killed one, wounded another, but the 3rd guy escaped. Since they broke in, the âstand your ground lawâ was used and he wasnât charged.
Burglar: Enters someone home
Bullet: I am inside you now.
You shouldâve said bullets because nobody only shoots once
âItâs pretty difficult to answer thatâ no itâs pretty easy to answer you broke in my house your life is now forfeit
Especially after he âlunged at youâ itâs a very easy answer to make
Love this comment lol
"Him or me?" I mean it's a very easy answer to make and one that he made even easier by attacking first.
I think it's funny when people say "you value your stuff more than someones life?" I always say "no they value my stuff more than their life."
Cursed comment
Number 15
As stated, it depends on the state in question. Braking into any home is risky, in California, you might get away unharmed if you meticulously plan it. In Texas itâs simply suicide.
Our house got broken into a few years back while I was asleep upstairs. I heard something fall and thought it was my dog so i started walking downstairs. About halfway down i heard foot steps and could see the guys leg so i went back up, grabbed my gun and racked the chamber. Before i could even call out that I was armed the guy took off, never found out who it was.
If someone is in my house uninvited Iâm in fear of my life .
When you enter with bad intentions then you have Gavin up you chance of life because you youâre self. Not the guy shooting the gun. Donât blame the man who ends the fight but the one who started it. We would be in a lot of better position in this country if we just punish the guy who started it.
@@James-sm5vg If they armed, I'm on your side. If you shoot someone for trying to steal your stuff, you're a psychopath.
@@Stevie8654 not really
@@Stevie8654 what?
@@Stevie8654 your a fool if you wait to shoot long enough to find out what they are after giving them plenty of time to shoot you first its simple if they broke in SHOOT THEM if they keep moving after that shoot them more
If you broke into my house while I'm sleeping and vulnerable, you have forfeited your right to live
Sociopath
@@rieldebonk1044 sociopath
@@rieldebonk1044 sociopath
@@rieldebonk1044 so, self defense is sociopathic, your logic makes no sense to me
@@heavenlylordNOS are you agreeing with him
If someone breaks into house and threatens you and your family then I definitely agree you have every right to defend yourself
1:19 - 2:23 Well said Depends on the situation
That one with the Halloween party. I blame the wife because sheâs like âhm, some people in a suit and another as a mummy. Obviously they have come for my soulâ
The husband shot because itâs kinda not normal either way for the person to walk toward you when your pointing a gun at them
I agree, but he could have fired a warning shot, but that's just my opinion.
@@imanburger6556 Wait, what if he had only one bullet?
I read soul as âsoilâ and I was very confused.
@@imanburger6556 FYI, warning shots are illegal in most states and come with prison sentences.
To be fair if itâs Halloween he would probably assume that itâs a toy gun...
Reminds me of the Simpsons gag "I'm gonna start swinging my fists, and if you happen to get in front of them, it's not my fault!"
Hey this is out of topic but. Are you aware of your views are dropping?
Burglar: oh yeah? well Iâm gonna swing my legs, and you happen get in the way itâs your fault.
Depends on the state and local laws.
0:01 the perfect motivation
That guy who killed the Japanese exchange student definitely shouldâve been jailed, Jesus Christ... And Iâm usually a tad bit on the pro-gun side. Thatâs just wrong man. He said he was looking for a party
I mean it was a bit much but you have to agree you have to be more than overly confident to be approaching someone who is pointing a gun at you.
@@valoriehansen1649 Nah I donât have to agree because they pulled out a gun after a kid in a costume told them they were looking for a party. I wasnât just a bit much.
I wanted to puke when I heard that
Looking for a party seems like a easy lie to help facilitate a home invasion. The man couldn't have known the exchange student wouldn't understand a widely used phrase. It's university understood you don't walk towards someone pointing a gun at you
@@Grinch1776 I did some more research and they said he wasnât wearing his contacts, might not have understood the command âfreezeâ, and/or thought it was part of a costume.
Me: *slowly pulling out gun to clean it when I see the title*
slowly putting on my gloves watching this
Me: slowly sharpening my pocket knife
*... Uhh yeah, Fbi? I think theres a bunch of people who yall need to go get, like RIGHT NOW*
what
which software you use to make these animations ?