After Starship's 2ND flight Launch Musk said that Starship Flight 3 should be ready to Fly
Vložit
- čas přidán 20. 11. 2023
- Musk said Sunday that Starship Flight 3 hardware should be ready to fly in the next three to four weeks.
Join us on a journey through the highs and lows of SpaceX's Starship program. From the exhilarating liftoff to the unexpected setbacks, discover the intricacies of space exploration, Elon Musk's visionary goals, and the resilience that propels humanity toward the Moon, Mars, and beyond. This is the unfolding saga of SpaceX, where challenges become stepping stones in the pursuit of a multi-planetary future."
#spacex #3rdstarshiplaunch #spacexstarship - Věda a technologie
This wasn’t a failure. If you were actually following this, you would understand. This flight was MMUCH MORE SUCCESSFUL than the previous flight.
1). The OLM survived this time.
2). The Booster flew with all engines firing all the way up.
3). Stage separation was achieved successfully.
4). The Starship reached nearly orbital velocity.
There was no failure here; but plenty of progress.
Some call it a success. I do not. Think back just a bit, the first HLS test made it to orbit and flew around the moon in a two-week mission. Nasa did it right the first time. Going back to the 1960s, NASA built and flew the Saturn5 five rocket without one failure. A rocket in which both stages blew up is not a success on the level of NASA. Yes, SpaceX learned some things, but a success it was not.
czcams.com/video/ka5id7ZQKL4/video.html
This is what progress means.... fast learning....and not many decades of thinking about it....
what nonsense please report the reality. the test was an overwhelming success
No disrespect but why do you use a cheap video scramble effe t on your main material. Really Diminishes the quality of your production
1st Launch expectations:
1. Don't explode on Stage 0
2. Successfully leave the launch pad
3. Test Stage 1 and stage 2
4. Collect data until ship and booster until soft landing or destroyed
5. Analyze data and make improvements to next launch.
(There has to be a plan for success even if you do not expect it)
2nd Launch expectations:
1. Don't explode on the launch pad
2. Test Stage 0 Improvements
3. Successfully leave the launch pad
4. Test Stage 1 and stage 2 improvements
5. Collect data until flight completion
6. Analyze data to make improvements to next launch
You want to find what improvements need to be made before lives are at stake. Through this trial and error, Space X makes the most efficient and safest rockets on the planet.
This is why Elon Musk does not file patents. By the time the patent is processed it is already outdated and improved upon.
This is how innovation works and it is amazing to see first hand. It's inspiring!
The HATERS wanna turn SpaceX into Blue Origin which has done nothing so far.
All the negatives but none of the positives. You should look at the stated objectives that SpaceX achieved, before criticising. It launched without damaging stage 0. It successfully fired all 33 engines (a record), achieved hot staging and Starship achieved 145 km altitude which is above the Karmin line and so in space. The Vacuum raptors fired for almost the planned time and got to 24000km/hr. The sub orbital flight and re-entry phase would have been nice, but this is a prototype and SpaceX works on rapid iteration, not delays measured in years and cost over runs like legacy aerospace companies.
what needed to be prooved is on paper and can check boxed as they are achieved.
but there is also the hope they could go farther in this shot.
Major failure no ..... maybe in your book.
Your commentator apparently hasn't noticed one thing:
we've been living among the stars since the
earth's creation.
In case he forgot, our sun is the closest star to us.
So, even if Elon's Starship were to make it to the moon -
maybe even to Mars - to get to "among the stars"
Starship is absolutely not capable of reaching "among
the stars" in any possible case.
In order to achieve this goal, we need different ones,
we need new, we need innovative drives for our future
real Starships.
With absolute certainty, chemically operated recoil
drives will not succeed, dear commentator.
Wake up.
Get real.
How was that a massive setback? Clearly you haven't been keeping up with how spacex does their work.
It's called iterative design. They have a minimal goal and a maximal goal. The maximal goal wasn't reached no, but it never is, their minimal goal was to test and achieve stage separation! Which they did, not flawlessly but their flight was a succes. Maybe not a massive one. But a good one none the less...
High stakes? Ambitious? Short lived optimism?
Sorry, I'm not subscribing. I'll stick with everyday astronoaut, what about it, and marcus house...
This video sounds like hit piece 👎