Sharp Eye "Inferno F T" (Filipe Toledo) Surfboard Review Ep.140

Sdílet
Vložit
  • čas přidán 10. 03. 2024
  • In this episode, Noel Salas reviews the Sharp Eye "Inferno F T" with special guest shaper Marcio Zouvi. It all started when Felipe Toledo asked Marcio for a quad that had high performance like his thruster surfboards, and Marcio went to work on the model by playing around with fin placement. Starting with the dims on the "Inferno 72," Marcio wanted to increase speed, projection and recovery from turns. He added a bit more rocker compared to the "Infrerno 72" and calls it somewhere between that High Performance Shortboard and a Daily Driver. Noels says the "Inferno F T" doesn't disappoint with lots of drive, speed and no short of pivot. Noel says it's his favorite HPSB in the pool to date. Eddie Lester of Southern California says it feels like a HPSB with lots of pop to make it feel super high performance in those California waves. Eric Petersen rides it in North Florida and Puerto Rico waves. He says it performed nicely, but he would consider getting a shorter one if he intended riding it more in Florida. Asa Cascavilla said the board was loose and playful with lots of speed. Top-to-bottom pivot, it felt more like a thruster and definitely a favorite. Watch the complete review for all the details!
    Where to Buy Boards: sharpeyesurfboards.com/produc...
    Where to Buy Vaer Watches: www.vaerwatches.com/
    Where to Buy Fins: surfnshow.com/products/moment...
    Noel's height 5'9" and Weight 173 lbs.
    Board Dims: 5'6" x 19 x 2.38 (26L)
    Eddie Lester Height 6'0" and Weight 190 lbs
    Board DIMS: Stock '0" x 19.38 x 2.63 (30.778L)
    Eric Petersen Height 5'8" and Weight 180 lbs
    Board DIMS: 5'9.5" x 19.25 x 2.63 (29.5L)
    Asa's Height 5'10" and Weight 165 lbs
    Board Dims: 5'6" x 19 x 2.38 (26L)
  • Krátké a kreslené filmy

Komentáře • 56

  • @surfnshowreviews7777
    @surfnshowreviews7777  Před 4 měsíci

    www.surfer.com/surf-n-show/video-sharp-eye-inferno-ft-filipe-toledo-surfboard-review

  • @j.mach1133
    @j.mach1133 Před 4 měsíci +6

    Great review Noel! Really like how you are getting multiple surfers to test the boards in the pool and the ocean. Stoked for the next review!

  • @johns.9527
    @johns.9527 Před 4 měsíci +4

    Thanks for the awesome review Noel! Always super interesting to hear from the shapers what went into designing the board!

  • @brynnjones8799
    @brynnjones8799 Před 4 měsíci +3

    Great call on multi surfer reviews well done

  • @bodhitree33
    @bodhitree33 Před 4 měsíci +4

    I can't wait to see you try the CI dumpster diver 2.

  • @cm1297
    @cm1297 Před 4 měsíci +2

    Awesome review as always! 🤙

  • @RonyCachola
    @RonyCachola Před měsícem +1

    That’s the best surfboard model I ever had!!!

  • @soulsurfer3102
    @soulsurfer3102 Před 4 měsíci +2

    never surf on sharp eye.but the disco inferno look amazing.thanks for the review champ

  • @cdbeen123
    @cdbeen123 Před 4 měsíci +3

    Good review, thanks. Any chance of reviewing the FireWire Kelly Slater S-Boss ?

  • @turbowtime9611
    @turbowtime9611 Před 3 měsíci

    Definitely my dream board. I can't afford it but it's #1 on my list of wants.

  • @luclamouliatte9582
    @luclamouliatte9582 Před 4 měsíci +1

    Hello Noël, thank you for this great review. I got the Inferno 72 in 5'8" x 19.0 x 2.45 26.60 L, wonderfull board. How is the paddle power and the wave entry of the FT compare to the 72 ? Do you recommend to order the same dims ?

    • @surfnshowreviews7777
      @surfnshowreviews7777  Před 4 měsíci

      The I72 and IFT paddle roughly the same. Similar entry rocker…. Go roughly the same dims and volume as you I72.

  • @dr.ivanpenna6767
    @dr.ivanpenna6767 Před 4 měsíci +3

    Nice review!
    How would you compare the FT to the Inferno 72? I remember you really liked the 72. On the 72 we can do a thruster, but on the FT not just quad, what does that mean?

    • @surfnshowreviews7777
      @surfnshowreviews7777  Před 4 měsíci +8

      I think the F T is more of a HPSB and it needs a wave with a little punch to it…. Even if the wave is waist to shoulder high. The F T would not be my first pick for mushy flat faced waves. The I72 has a bit more glide… it offers more down the line speed with less effort so that makes it a little more user friendly in smaller waves. If you are good at using your rails to generate speed then the F T will be a fun Daily Driver in less than average waves. That’s why I say it’s more of a HPSB…. It likes to be on rail and you can push hard through turns and get lots of speed with the Quad set up.

  • @NCsurfer607
    @NCsurfer607 Před 4 měsíci +3

    Nice review! I got D2 5’4” with your quad set and absolutely love it I’m 5’8” 145 lbs looking at the FT how does it compare to D2?

    • @surfnshowreviews7777
      @surfnshowreviews7777  Před 4 měsíci +3

      Stoked you like my Quad set. The F T offers way more performance in the pocket compared to the D2. The F T surfs more like a HPSB and the D2 will be your Daily Driver or Small Wave Performance Board. This will be a great 2 board quiver

    • @NCsurfer607
      @NCsurfer607 Před 4 měsíci +1

      What construction would you recommend here in the east coast ? I was thinking E 3

    • @surfnshowreviews7777
      @surfnshowreviews7777  Před 4 měsíci

      @@NCsurfer607 I agree… go E3

  • @foxgd9117
    @foxgd9117 Před 4 měsíci +3

    Please review Frk+, s boss or great white twin aswell with volcanic and ibolic construction?

  • @jizl88
    @jizl88 Před 4 měsíci +1

    Amazing review as always!! What do u think about the peppa twin from Chilli ? How does it compare with this one?! I have had really good recommendations about the Peppa twin, any thoughts about it? If u have to pick between Peppa or rnf 96, which one would u pick?! Thank u and thanks for being a legend! Always super helpful

    • @surfnshowreviews7777
      @surfnshowreviews7777  Před 4 měsíci

      The Peppa Twin is fun… I will drop that review soon. The Peppa Twin needs a wave to go good…. It’s more of a daily driver and it needs a wave with some push. The 96 is more versatile and it shreds 2-8’ surf. I personally like the 96 better

  • @tiagocarvalho983
    @tiagocarvalho983 Před 4 měsíci +1

    Hi Noel! Thank you for your work. How do you compare this board to the Pyzelien 2?

    • @surfnshowreviews7777
      @surfnshowreviews7777  Před 4 měsíci

      The P2 might have a little more entry rocker less glide and down the line speed. The P2 offers a Thruster and Twin + Trailer Option for more pivot compared to IFT. The IFT is a bit more refined in the rails offering a little more rail engagement at high speeds. All in all the IFT draws sharper lines like a true HPSB.

    • @tiagocarvalho983
      @tiagocarvalho983 Před 4 měsíci +1

      @@surfnshowreviews7777 thank very much Noel for your reply. I think the Pyzelien is the right board for me.

  • @geoffreymccann2841
    @geoffreymccann2841 Před 4 měsíci +1

    I had a Glenn Winton quad back then I think it would have been a better board if you had the fin choice of today . The inferno ft is a fantastic looking board I was only looking at them today.

  • @zach1978
    @zach1978 Před 7 dny +1

    I noticed you went way under your weight/6 liter range, was that just for the freshwater pool or do you notice sharpeye EPS and EPS carbon float more? Only asking because I'm currently ordering an FT in carbon but my weight is around 180-185 and height 5'10" (advanced, but coming off injuries and don't want to ride a blade). Typically ride around 29.7-30.5 for this type of shortboard, but your dims make me think I could go lower

    • @surfnshowreviews7777
      @surfnshowreviews7777  Před 7 dny

      @@zach1978 I surf the pool with less volume in general. In the ocean I would probably surf this board around 27-28L

  • @fosdikejames
    @fosdikejames Před 4 měsíci +7

    Definately not a 6ft to 10ft board!! I don't no what those sort of waves look like in the US but in West Aus it easily taps out at 4ft ish if you want to ride it how its meant to be ridden.

    • @MrRobinski
      @MrRobinski Před 4 měsíci

      yes deep single concaves don't like the power and bump, raw conditions in SW

  • @medphysio3746
    @medphysio3746 Před 4 měsíci +2

    Yeeeew I have the FT 5.11 30.5L C1 carbon tech this think is mental ! Maybe want to test the inferno 72 c1 carbon for smaller waves what do you think ? Should I pass and keep trying hard on my ft or should I grab the inferno72 ? What’s your opinion ?

    • @surfnshowreviews7777
      @surfnshowreviews7777  Před 4 měsíci +3

      The I72 will offer a bit more pivot and a little more glide for smaller waves. I think these two board surf completely different but if you want a sick two board quiver I say keep your F T and get a Storms Twin Turbo. The Twin Turbo is next level fun in smaller waves.

    • @medphysio3746
      @medphysio3746 Před 4 měsíci +1

      For me the fr is my all go to board conditions even smaller weaker wave because I take my upper volume 30.5L in 5.11 but when it’s mushier bigger sometimes it go for fast down the line that is hard to have a sharper pivot. That’s why I was thinking get inferno 72 to offer more pivot when it’s stormy conditions for exemple

    • @medphysio3746
      @medphysio3746 Před 4 měsíci +2

      Or inferno72 c1 with a swallow tail ? Don’t know 🤔

    • @surfnshowreviews7777
      @surfnshowreviews7777  Před 4 měsíci +2

      @@medphysio3746 You will get a little more pivot with the I72 with a Thruster set up for sure. Especially in bumpy conditions

    • @medphysio3746
      @medphysio3746 Před 4 měsíci +1

      @@surfnshowreviews7777 thanks for you quick reply 🙏 you really help casual dude to make good choice in therme of quiver ! and do you think swallow tail with the inferno 72 would be a good idea in therme of release ? Or it will mess with the design ?

  • @theseb1979
    @theseb1979 Před 4 měsíci +3

    I assume that it simply refuses to surf when it’s over 6 foot?

    • @surfnshowreviews7777
      @surfnshowreviews7777  Před 4 měsíci +2

      According to Eddie Lester in this review it works good in well overhead surf.

    • @alberto0
      @alberto0 Před měsícem +1

      I have one in PU. I think it goes much better in larger surf. If you can draw longer line with that speed is pretty amazing. I bought it to use as a everyday one and I got a synergy in EPS for better wave, and I ended up using the synergy when smaller and the FT when better. Construction might play a role on it, but it is very drivey, fast, stable board IMHO

    • @surfnshowreviews7777
      @surfnshowreviews7777  Před měsícem +1

      Maybe try it in overhead surf with a really Raked fin. Al Merrick, Mick Fanning, Carvers, Jordy’s fins, Legacy R8

    • @alberto0
      @alberto0 Před měsícem +1

      @@surfnshowreviews7777 yes. I think it goes better in overhead rather than smaller waves. Using the rasta quad on it now.

  • @gaiamoas5570
    @gaiamoas5570 Před 4 měsíci +1

    Xanadu for the next review please.

    • @surfnshowreviews7777
      @surfnshowreviews7777  Před 4 měsíci +1

      I did a Xanadu review a few years back on the Moskah and it didn’t get too many views. You are the only request for his boards. Sorry….. however Xanadu is one of the best shapers in the world in my book. I used to ride his boards on tour back in the late 90’s and they were the best boards I ever had back then.

  • @pinellasproperties
    @pinellasproperties Před 4 měsíci +1

    Dumpster diver 2 next