What is a confounder? - Epidemiology tutorial to learn the basics in only 5 minutes!

Sdílet
Vložit
  • čas přidán 21. 07. 2024
  • In this epidemiology tutorial, I will explain what a confounder is using easy examples from clinical studies. This epidemiology tutorial will teach you the basics.
    Like this video? Please subscribe to my channel. These videos might also be of interest for you:
    - Adjusting for confounding: • Adjusting for confound...
    - Confounding by indication: • CONFOUNDING BY INDICAT...
    Please leave me a comment with any (positive or negative) feedback as I am just starting out on youtube.

Komentáře • 17

  • @arthurwalker636
    @arthurwalker636 Před 2 lety +1

    Thank you this video makes sense I actually comprehend confounding; keep up the good work.

  • @RawaMuhsin
    @RawaMuhsin Před 2 lety +1

    Thank you for the clear and simple explanation.

  • @jameelkifayatullah4819
    @jameelkifayatullah4819 Před 2 měsíci

    Nice video make more

  • @bg_1886
    @bg_1886 Před 2 lety +1

    Very clear presentation of what is seemingly a confusing topic. Many thanks.

  • @ICQwhereRU
    @ICQwhereRU Před 3 lety +1

    Thanks, great and informative video.

  • @wayneaskin780
    @wayneaskin780 Před 5 měsíci

    Very informative

  • @danielkirunda5983
    @danielkirunda5983 Před 2 měsíci

    0:42 very informative

  • @marcomahdi435
    @marcomahdi435 Před 2 lety

    Thank you.

  • @gwynbird5361
    @gwynbird5361 Před 2 lety +1

    Thanks for the great video's! I have a question about predictive/causal (aetiological) studies: is it not done to look at both prediction and aetiology in one study? Study setup: prospective cohort study with pre-operative and (4month follow up) postoperative questionnaires. I want to know if I can use a questinonaire as a predictor for symptom score, so I will use a stepwise or backward multiple regression for all possible predictors and identify which model gives the best prediction of symptom score, evaluating if my questionnaire is the best predictor. Yet, some people have a preexisting illness or preexisting allergies, and I suspect these individuals might be at risk for developing symptoms (i.e. getting a higher symptom score). If I want to identify a possible causal relationship between these preexisting illnesses and allergies, I would like to adjust for confounders (in this case age, BMI and intoxications), but I don't know if this is highly unusual to do in a study where my main focus is the predictive value of a questionnaire. Thanks for your time!

    • @gwynbird5361
      @gwynbird5361 Před 2 lety

      Furthermore, I would like to evaluate the effect of certain variables on recovery of symptoms (i.e. preoperative symptom score - postoperative symptom score (difference)). However, for one of my variables (duration of self-reported symptoms pre-operative), I am not sure if this can necessarily be defined as 'an exposure'. Therefore, i am not sure if I should be adjusting this variable for possible confounders. Thanks!

    • @nienkedeglas_mdphd
      @nienkedeglas_mdphd  Před 2 lety +1

      I get your point, indeed in many studies the two are used together. Of course, a causal factor can also be used as a predictor, as it is more likely to be cood in predicting your outcome. The important thing here is that you keep very clear in your manuscript about the distinction between the two. If you intend to develop a predictionmodel to predict your outcome, the choice of covariates will be different compared to if you truly want to prove causal relations, since in the last case, you will have to think in more detail about the possible confounders (and causal pathways). I hope this helps a little bit!

    • @nienkedeglas_mdphd
      @nienkedeglas_mdphd  Před 2 lety +1

      I think the duration of preoperative symptoms can be considered as an exposure, so yes I do think you should adjust for confounders if you want to look at the causal relation between this exposure and your outcome.

    • @gwynbird5361
      @gwynbird5361 Před 2 lety

      @@nienkedeglas_mdphd Thanks for your clear and understandable comments! They are of great help. Keep up the videos!

  • @darixkuijs4075
    @darixkuijs4075 Před 2 lety +1

    Geweldig uitgelegd