Why Tesla And Other EV Ranges May Be Inaccurate
Vložit
- čas přidán 19. 06. 2024
- Since the Environmental Protection Agency was founded in 1970, one of its primary tasks has been testing gas burning vehicles - both to see how much they pollute and to tell consumers how many miles per gallon they are liable to get in a car. But since electric vehicles came to market in significant numbers after 2010, the agency has been shifting toward telling consumers how much range they should expect to get on each car. The trouble is that EV technology is changing…fast. The agency has had decades to refine standards for gas burning cars, and just a few years for EVs. Some critics say the tests are inaccurate. CNBC went inside the EPA’s National Vehicle and Fuel Emissions Laboratory to find out how they test EVs.
Chapters:
00:00 - Introduction
02:17 - What the EPA tests
05:44 - How the EPA tests
08:30 - Challenges
13:43 - The future
Produced by: Robert Ferris
Editor: Darren Geeter
Supervising Producer: Jeniece Pettitt
Graphics: Jason Reginato
Camera and Production Support: Andrew Evers
» Subscribe to CNBC: cnb.cx/SubscribeCNBC
» Subscribe to CNBC TV: cnb.cx/SubscribeCNBCtelevision
About CNBC: From 'Wall Street' to 'Main Street' to award winning original documentaries and Reality TV series, CNBC has you covered. Experience special sneak peeks of your favorite shows, exclusive video and more.
Connect with CNBC News Online
Get the latest news: www.cnbc.com/
Follow CNBC on LinkedIn: cnb.cx/LinkedInCNBC
Follow CNBC News on Facebook: cnb.cx/LikeCNBC
Follow CNBC News on Twitter: cnb.cx/FollowCNBC
Follow CNBC News on Instagram: cnb.cx/InstagramCNBC
#CNBC
Why Tesla And Other EV Ranges May Be Inaccurate
I rented a Chevy bolt and the range changes drastically while driving, I definitely understand the range anxiety
Climate control and low temperatures takes its toll on your range. As long as you understand that, you will be fine once you develop your sense of operational charging and how to find the DC chargers while traveling.
@@barryredman2803 oh I did not know that, that helps. Also finding a place to charge can be a challenge as well
@@barryredman2803 that's a major problem that needs to be addressed and became glaringly obvious with the cold weather we've had recently. My ICE's mpg drops by less than 5% when it's in single digits outside and it still only takes 3 minutes to get enough fuel to go 400 miles. EVs range drops significantly in the cold and so does the time it takes to charge.
@@Noah_E Yes, so that means only 9% of the available energy in gasoline is actually powering your car, the rest of it is lost to friction, air resistance, and heat. Any actual solutions or do you just want to remain an advocate for carbon monoxide?
It's only going to improve over time.@@dynamitedingo7720
3:07 Driver literally just got caught changing lanes without signaling
@3:15 "they provide us with a car" so the manufactures choose the vehicle. surely the EPA should randomly purchase a typical example, rather than allowing the manufacturer to choose a top performing example ?
Yes, that would seem to invite a cycle of time and money wasting misrepresentation.
They do that with OBD testing
@@MI-gs1qoyeah let's ask the computer what's going on instead of actually measuring it. Reports don't matter real numbers do. VW proved this flaw.
On emissions why does it matter what's reported and if it's orginal and not what is actually coming out the exhaust?
This surprised me too. I read Consumer Reports and they always buy the products they test. It seems so obvious.
I would like to see battery/range degradation numbers for each vehicle, as a function of calendar aging and mileage. Even more useful would be an EPA approved website where I can select a car model and year, and then input various parameters (payload, outside temperature, typical driving speed, vehicle mileage, etc), and get a range estimate. The more parameters I enter, possibly the more accurate the result).
Add a test for range in miles from 80% to 20% state of charge?
Good point. Nobody fills their gas tank to 80% because it doesn't make the tank smaller over time to fill it to 100%, nor does it take an extra hour or two to put in that last 20%. Realistically, drivers should be more interested in the actual usable range, not the theoretical range that will degrade the battery if you actually fill it 100% and run it down to zero.
That's rocket science for the EPA guys.
You can adjust that in settings on your touch screen. Mine is set at 80%-40%.
Really? Take the EPA number and multiply it by 0.6.
Could the EPA rating use some adjustment? Sure. I would argue it isn't that big a deal. It'll ALWAYS be inaccurate; too many variances between how people drive, conditions driven in, etc.
By now people should understand any EPA estimate (gas, EV, whatever) is ideal and should not be taken as gospel. This isn't new.
What we really can get from it, aside from a range estimation, is the ability to compare different cars to one another. THIS is what we need.
The key, then, is having manufacturers all follow the same program and report the same. No hedging numbers in either direction. Test correctly and report those tests.
i think it would also be helpful that the specific test parameters be provided with the stated EPA ratings (transparency), so the consumer knows exactly what test that EPA number was generated from. And to be fair, who the source of that test result data was provided by (the manufacturer or the EPA agency). and if there were any discrepancies, to disclose what the discrepancies were and what was done to resolve them.
I have seen multiple people say they get more range sometimes.
I don't think they are lying. I just wonder if their meters are wrong. Like are you drafting a few feet from semis on the highway? How are you getting 20 to 30 miles more.
Then the Taycon having that much of a difference. What did they say. Nearly 80 miles more? The hell.
Anyway that is a scary thought. Having a messed up range meter or gauge.
One side note. Auto makers should make more ways to have it where you charge at 20-80%. In fact when the car is at 20% make it say zero. Since min maxing your battery is one guaranteed way to shorten your battery life... Just like ICE cars require things like oil changes. EVs require that to extend the life of the vehicle.
Hopefully the government pushes ways for battery swaps to be easier, and those batteries recyable.
"Aggressive driving is tested at 80mph"
That's the literal speed limit in a few states. My state, Texas, included lmao. Gotta love it
unfortunately its 65 where i am
@@michaellong2439and more than likely people drive at least five over. So even with a 65 posted speed the average speed is 70, but the EPA still tests at 55.
Don't worry, the will restrict the speed so the EV makes more sense once forced upon you.
The "elite" hide this as a secret for centuries, this is the true story of your enslavement 👉 The Connections (2021) [short documentary] 💖
I always start watching these videos very enthusiastic but then after 5 minutes I want to fall asleep. 🤷🏽
Which specific video content are you referring to?
@@MurseTech64all from CNBC
Agree. They should make videos bit more brief.
0:26: 🚗 Electric vehicles (EVs) are gaining popularity in the US, but there are concerns about the accuracy of their range estimates.
3:27: 🚗 The EPA tests cars to ensure they meet regulations and collects data for other agencies.
6:51: 🚗 The EPA faces challenges in testing electric vehicles due to the complexity of factors like battery depletion, real-world driving conditions, and heating/cooling systems.
9:32: 🚗 The way electric vehicle (EV) range is tested and reported can lead to discrepancies between lab results and real-world driving, causing range anxiety for drivers.
12:46: 🚗 Car and driver testing data shows that EVs fall short of their range numbers by 12.5% on average, and the range can vary depending on driving conditions.
16:19: 🚗 Automakers have a history of pushing against regulations, as seen in the Dieselgate scandal, but the focus is now on electric vehicles and ensuring they are environmentally friendly.
Recap by Tammy AI
Look at the discrepancy on the Porsche Taycan 4S. Rated at just over 200 miles yet they were able to get over 300. I have a Kia EV6 GT rated at 206 miles yet I am getting 270-280 miles. The EPA needs to drive them, not just hook them up to machines and then use arbitrary correction factors.
I think they need to do both since it's difficult to get repeatable conditions in a real world driving environment (temperature and wind, a tester's driving style, etc.).
Low range lfp is crap
For sure… As if they haven’t thought about that like you have from your armchair.
I do think it's best to underestimate than to overestimate. It's hard if you go to a 300 mile journey but stop at 200 miles because you're out of juice. Better just plan for a 200 mile journey and still have plently left over if you need to charge up.
@@triadwarfare
You are never gonna be stranded at 200 miles, if that's what you get, because infotainment keeps telling you how much juice is left :)
So why don't they just report miles per kilowatt for city and highway like the Gas cars? Or just change the ICE numbers to total combined range like EV's? Oh that's right, the oil companies want you to have range anxiety so you avoid EVs.....They could also put range with the cost to recharge/refuel. Like 350 miles/$120 for an F150 or 350 miles/$20 for an F150 EV.
Cost to recharge isn't something they can do, given the wildly varying costs of electricity by region/state, and also varying cost by time in many cases.
They definitely should have separate range numbers for highway and city just like ICE, and the highway test needs to be updated to be representative of real world highway conditions in the United States. The EPA "highway" cycle never goes above 60 MPH and spends a lot of time below 40 - when in reality nearly all interstates are 65+.
They kinda do! And mine will tell me right on my dash. Hyundai says I'm supposed to get 17kwh /100km
I get around 12-15 in the summer and 17-20 in the canadian winter. Public charging is pay per minute, so a ton of factors go into how much a charge will cost to dc fast charge. I dont use public chargers much, but it costs me about $20 for 400km. You can Google energy rates in your area, I dont pay utilities, and charge completely for free from home, so I can't help. But you could tell me how much it would cost to charge my 64 kwh battery by finding out how much a kwh costs at your home. It's cheap. Ridiculously cheap compared to gas
I want to see a min/max range reported for EVs that is more than just city vs highway. Let's take two simple examples: he manufacturer would test the car like this: 1. A gentle drive around the city, no jackrabbit starts, no maxing out the power, no air conditioning or heating used, no use of the sound system. 2. A drive on a very hot day, with the air conditioning on, climbing at high speed up a mountain road, with the 2,000 watt stereo blasting and somebody in the back seat watching a video on a screen powered by the car. 3. A drive up a mountain on a very cold day with the heat fully turned on, deicers and widow wipers going. IThis way I can get some idea of what range to reasonably expect and what my safety margins are in each scenario.
They need to rate EVs by miles per KW highway and city using 70 degrees Fahrenheit. Then people can realize or understand that extremes are going to change the outcome. Example : Say a Nissan Leaf one of the first gen early models without active cooling. They had a sweet spot for mileage in town at about 35 mph and 50 degrees F that is where they did their best. Anything warmer started to drastically change the range and anything over 60 mph started to drastically change the range.
So as an example realistically you could give it a rating of 4 mpkw city and 2.8 mpkw Highway at 70 degrees.
Now we know that in town driving can vary all over the place and that Highway speeds can vary but the faster you go with an EV the quicker your range drops off. The more extreme the temperature is away from 70 degrees the greater the range loss.
The Nissan Leaf would have had the biggest swing in range loss and something like the Tesla in that era would have had the least change in range loss but both would have been affected the same way.
Now when you looked at the data on the window sticker it would have told you that. It also would have the equivalent mpge to give people a comparison to a gas vehicle near the same size.
If your vehicle came with a 30 KWh battery pack vs a 60 KWh battery pack you could get a sense of how much range to expect out of your vehicle.
The first gen Leaf got some range improvement when they went to the 30 KWh battery pack and you could expect to get around 75 miles average when it was newer.
Many ICE car owners would have known more of what to expect out of their Electric vehicles if that information was on the sticker.
I agree
There are a few things they missed. Legacy automakers tend to do better than their published ranges, the range drops are mostly in start ups and mostly in Tesla's. The reason is they use the 5 part test but also the Germans go one step further and state a lower range than tested, knowing that the cars will loose range over time. Some pf the other legacy automakers do the same, but to a lesser extent. Also, many of the things that shrink EV range shrinks gas range too, its is just less noticeable.
If you read the EPA submissions from Porsche, they gamed the numbers AGAINST their favor in classic Porsche underpromise and overdeliver. The EPA allows you to use less aggressive dyno coefficients than the target, with the logic that the dyno itself and tires have rolling resistance that is in addition to the dyno set coefficients. Many AWD EVs even have negative values for some of the coefficients because the dyno rollers lead to higher rolling resistance than flat pavement.
Porsche didn't even bother to deal with this. They just set the dyno coefficients to the target, which meant that rolling resistance was double counted in their test in a manner EXTREMELY unfavorable to them. Which is one of the reasons why the Taycan is one of the only EVs to beat its EPA range numbers when driven at 70 MPH steady-state - it not only does so, by does so by a MASSIVE margin.
@@Entropy512
Thanks for the info. Engineering combined with ethics and values. I like it.
bollocks, every tesla i purchased has about 80-100km less range than what they advertise. never more
@@deficator750
Yes, that’s what most people observed. Established carmakers like Porsche are honest, startup car makers like Tesla are crooks.
Elon, Kanye, trump. Same thing.
My brand new Ford Fusion got closer to HALF the MPG it was rated for, even with premium gas and gentle driving. I took it back to the dealer, they agreed, but said the official response from Ford was that FORD was ok with that. I never bought a Ford again.
8 years into EV ownership with over 200k miles driven between 5 different EVs. 2 owned and 3 rented for long distance trips. The craziest thing to me is the cold hit to range and then the second biggest observation I have had is how much of a difference it makes on highways to stay behind a semi going long distances. You can do 65-70mph 3 car lengths behind a semi and be getting the same efficiency as doing 45-50.
Put another way, temperature, wind resistance, elevation, and speed, are the biggest factors when estimating the the range of am EV. The truck takes a brunt of the wind resistance allowing it to go further. Driving that close to a truck can be dangerous if it unexpectedly stops and it seems most EV drivers want to go faster than the trucks which leaves them in confusion why they didn't get the range advertised by the EPA.
@lancesbeataxes2901 Indeed, it can be dangerous staying close to the rear of a truck. Lucky at 35 I have a flawless driving record and always keep eyes forward. I'm not a distracted driver at all. I only use that method when I know I have to squeeze out a trip somewhere and back without charging.
Even not going behind a semi, but driving 60-65mph vs 70-75mph on the highway makes an enormous difference for EV range. I try to stay under 67 mph and go slower if that’s pace of the slower lane as long as it’s not super slow. I have a plug-in hybrid. So I try to save the fast highway driving of over 70mph for when the gas engine has engaged. And that really mostly only happens on overnight trips.
I use that method too, I’ll drive behind a truck or a school bus or something like that and get excellent range on the highway.
My first EV had a range of barely 30 miles. It was a '67 Mustang with a series wound motor and lead acid batteries. That was 30 years ago. My latest EV will go a month without charging unless I drive to the ball park and back.
A month? What ev
@@blink182bfsftw Pretty much all of them will do that. I drive 3,000 miles a year. Model 3 is my current model and I charge every other sunday whether I need to or not. Level 1 works for me.
I had a friend whos brother built a EV out of a VW van. It could go 100 feet until it ran out of electrical cord, LOL
Laptop Manufacturers: We never lie!
I just want to say, if we're worried about efficiency and reduced emissions, it's better to just ditch commuting by car and switch to walking, cycling, and public transit. For short distances, you can easily commute by walking or cycling. For longer distances, its far, far more efficient to transport dozens on a bus or hundreds on a train. This also reduces car traffic and pedestrian deaths/car accidents. Cities need to be designed right to make these safer and more reliable. Take a look at Tokyo or Amsterdam, a majority of the population do not commute by car or even own one, and the streets look beautiful. Cars are the wrong tools for the
You can't walk anywhere in so many parts of America. Walk-ability was designed out decades ago. The only places you can get anywhere on foot are the older cities (pre-WWI cities). Some places are starting to see the folly of those car-centric urban planning decisions, but it's going to take decades of hard work by thousands of municipalities before we start to see much of a reversal of the car-dependent system that's in place right now.
The cost of purchasing a new car today is very expensive, depreciation, insurance, maintenance, liability, and more. Car is a just a huge financial expense. An E-bike would more sense for a good portion of the population !
The average us commute is 27 miles each way in the USA.
@@franko8572 Thankfully, the average range of an E-bike is about 60 miles.
@@michaeloreilly657 Oh, good. I’ll just ride an e-bike on a highway, and across a toll road bridge, then I’ll plug it in to charge at my job where we have an abundance of charges.
Anyone know if aftermarket performance companies can elect to have the EPA test a car modified with their device? We have a device that we believe will improve both fuel economy and emissions over factory. How would you go about approaching the EPA on getting an official test done and how much would it cost?
Basically, the EPA need to consult with Bjørn Nyland (Teslabjørn) to get a good system nailed down.
13:23 - 13:42 How about a new required standard on that MSRP sticker: manufacturers must write a warning label to customers something like “Charge the EV at 20 percent”. Could help a bit with range anxiety for now. Or a software warning built into all EVs alerting the driver when the battery hits 20 percent, 10 percent, 5 percent, and finally at 1 percent. Could lastly offer suggestions to where the closest charging station is, too?
My 2023 Volvo S60 recharge is spot on - often I can exceed what the manufacturer says is possible.
Great reporting. I drive a Tesla, and don't really have complaints on my range estimates. But I also recognize that EV motors are far more energy efficient. The huge battery pack is equivalent to just a few gallons of gas. So when something that could impact a car's range (regardless of power plant) it is felt more significantly on the battery with it's added energy efficiency. I also don't have range anxiety. I know that if my car shows that I have 20 miles of range, and my next charge is 10 miles away, there is little I could do 'wrong' to burn that extra 10 miles of range before I reach the charger. And the car does a great job of moving me to a closer charger if I am 200 miles away and it thinks I won't make it to a charger that is too close to that stated range.
Hopefully this will put an end to the extremes both sides on this present. Car manufacturers are promising an unrealistic range or charge time. While the “take my gas and guns over my dead body” crowd claim that a rivian won’t go over 50 miles and takes 20 hours to charge. It will be nice to see a trusted third party be able to share some insight 👍
The rivian is a truck, when used as a truck towing or hauling it's range is diminished to nearly unusable.
“Take my guns over my dead body “ should be said by every free person..
learn history from 100years ago to today and you will still see government genocide in the millions ..
It is not flawed just that stated is ideal conditions, buyer must discount 30-50% of stated range as with time battery performance will decrease
Can’t wait until the EPA tests ranges for the Aptera. 400 mile variant to start and eventually up to 1,000 miles per charge.
whats amazing about EVs in my experience, lets say you are going to the mountains that's about 60miles. Going up could more or less meet 60miles on range because it could take some energy uphill.. On my way back home that says 60 mile, as we going down hill with regenerative breaking and more efficiency along the highway, I was only able to use 20 miles off the battery because I was gaining back so much energy back... that's amazing to me.
Yeah I was in Colorado and the Tesla app said that I had 71 percent battery. And when I would arrive at my destination, some 35 miles later, I would have 72 percent battery. At first I thought this must be some sort of terrible mistake. But then I realized that I'd be losing 6,000 feet in elevation for the trip. And when I arrived at my destination, damn if I didn't have 72% battery power. So I'd actuallly gained 1% batterty power after driving 35 miles. Amazing!
Did that very thing going to Mt Rainier’s paradise lodge and back in our Tes M3 LR
Of course, companies tend to exaggerate range than actual mileage especially Tesla models . I mean the gap between Tesla claims and EPA testing are getting smaller but there is still big difference. I trust EPA .
Just purchased a new model 3 rear wheel drive with all the rebates and tax credit I'm basically paying $28k for the car. My elect bill only goes up $75 more per month. A fun small car to drive and don't miss stopping at a gas station
For starters, the idiots at the EPA need to include a 70 mph constant speed test. That would better represent what one could expect to get on a highway trip with a mix of 75 mph running, plus some slow downs for construction and lower speed zones, etc.. Only the government can make it this hard to do such a simple test that actually would be meaningful. Of course there also should be a city driving rating.
This is why I keep searching for CZcams videos doing exactly these tests on both ICE and BEV cars. For my speed of interest, 130 kmh (80 mph) almost all BEV perform poorly and this is why I do not plan to buy a BEV in the near future. If I have to go slower than a bus, what's the point of paying for a car?
@@xynostasos9022Do you drive at 130kmh often?
@@anxiousearth680 I drive regularly at 130kmh-140kmh. And distances over 300km in total. The buses in my country drive at a constant 100kmh in the highways.
Anyone with a scooter like myself could tell you, it's never the actual range.. weight of the person(s) and other things like lights etc plays a factor for the effect its range. Especially, if you're staying on the same mph.
Not my observation - main factor is speed only - not constant / variable but speed - drive local streets 45 mph max with start / stop - you'll hit 330 m range - constant speed of 100 mph cuts it to 150 miles range
Range anxiety will truly be gone, once charging stations are as ubiquitous as gas stations. IMO the range of the vehicles aren't the problem but access to plentiful charging stations.
Yah, tesla owners don't have range anxiety.
The number of chargers won't change the inconvenience of using public chargers. It only takes 3-4 minutes to get enough fuel to go 300 miles in an ICE and the range typically drops less than 5% in winter and you can use essentially all of the fuel because you don't need a reserve to "precondition" a tank like an EV's battery when it's too hot or too cold. Even if every charger was a supercharger it would require at least five times the number of bays to charge the same number of vehicles daily and that would require a tremendous amount of energy and infrastructure vs a couple tanks in the ground and some pumps.
@@Noah_E except it does make a difference because not every car is in use all the time. Chargers at home (multiple at apt complexes) alone solves the majority of usage which is where most vehicles would naturally be charged at and more frequent chargers completes the gap. Again precondition isn’t an issue if chargers are plentiful because that preconditioning is taken care of while plugged in and at no real cost to your “tank” the biggest issue is reliable and plentiful charging because any and all public charging would be only necessary to get you to your next destination (home) to then complete the rest of your charging.
why do they have a driver in the car?? seems super weird for a test. use an actuator controlled by a computer and a standard test cycle.
You an tie a horse up on a treadmill and force it to run but that will never tell you how far it can go in a day. These so-called experts need to get out in the real world to test these cars and not be hiding in a building making worthless guesses.
Tesla EV shows 310mi range. In summer I usually get close to 310mi with methodical driving (not crossing 70mph, more lower speeds, sparing ac usage, no crazy acceleration). In winters it's about 10% lower at about 280mi if heaters are blasting else it's close to 310mi with preconditioned battery.
Overall Tesla is not bad. The software updates have made it less accurate and doing 75mph or 85mph does reduce range for sure. But it's also true in my gas car which has 360mi range. Drive bit more aggressive or at 80mph and you get lower gas mileage. If you're in traffic EV shines but gas fizzles in poor range. Gas is better at coming to ita range at 40mph to 65mph speeds.
there is no way you are getting 280 miles in the winter unless you live in Florida or something. what is your Wh/mile?
@@KC-zi4qb I do ;) I live in Northeast where it gets quite cold. My Whr/mi is about 242 Whr/mi. You have to precondition car with scheduled departure while it's plugged in. Then use heated seats and basically use heater sparingly. If you go ballistic without these then range loss is higher. Also if you commute longer the hit is lower opposed to quick 10m to 20m drive. My commute was about 65m each way
@@KC-zi4qb also sometimes depending on what I did it would even hit 300mi range in winter. Good driving practices have to be done for best EV result.
EV can take hit from poor driving just like gas. For my gas too hit was a lot (380mi range dropped to about 300mi if I blasted heater and drove without warming engine and crazy acceleration and high speed)
@@bryanholbrookwilliamschevrolet so I'm still on the original tires. I did have 2 incidents of nails through the tires. They're plugged at present. I ensure the psi is hovering around 42. ( I usually on cold morning set it to 43). It goes up after a long drive to about 45 and car seems zippiest and bouncy at that psi and seems to use least energy presumably due to reduced contact surface area with ground but some small %.
@@fr9714I don't have to pre-condition my vehicle, and I can run my air conditioning or heated seats heated steering wheel and heater. I get 450 miles, then stop for 10 minutes and get another 450. Keep that electric junk.
This discussion has no resolution. The variables factors are many. Take two identical F-150 trim level, engine, etc. trucks and one driver’s aggressive technique shall render an mpg up to 50% less than a driver with moderate technique. Change that to range and, just using numbers, a 300 mile truck shall have a 150 mile range. The reason to have EPA test under lab conditions is for consumers to have a comparison basis. I doubt any pickup owner selects the brand, model and trim level based on MPG test results. Take two Tesla Model Y’s and follow suit as to one driver cruising at 65 mph, in flat terrain, the other drives at 85 mph in hilly terrain. Range estimates from the lab go away. The range estimator in the car adjusts based on history. It’s not inaccuracy as to the software!
The EPA range should be after the degradation. It’s kind of a rip off to state the MPG on a new battery. ICE cars maintain their range for many years. I happen to own a Tesla Model Y long range. The range drops after 3 months and drops further for a little more time.
Charging habits have a very large influence on that. I have a model 3 LR with 14.9K miles after 13 months. No noticeable decrease in range yet.
They can do all the fancy talk but EPA range does not mean anything to a consumer. My model 3 EPA rated for 310 miles will give 240 miles.
They do the same with mpg on vehicles. High numbers you only see if you try to do granny driving to achieve it😂
The gas burning engine: shows a video of 5 alternators
Lovely music!
The EPA should investigate on how much pollution an EV produces from production til they are scrapped
Same for ICE cars, including the cost of drilling, machinery, oil spills , fuel used, refining and more.
Don't forget to add in the cost to society from air polution: 6 million deaths per year (lung cancer, emphysema, etc.). And global warming: house insurance increases, storm devistaions, beach erosion, etc., from ICE cars.
@@mauricelopez1745 And the cost to send military to fight wars in the middle east that is largely over oil supply security.
Don't forget the increase of atmospheric opacity that comes from blowing burnt gasoline out your tailpipe everywhere you go.
This test doesn't seem to take into account the vehicule mass and aerodynamics of it...
There are advantages and disadvantages to attaining as well as owning an EV, the first thing consumers may be concerned with is range. Tesla and the newly launched Lucid Motors are the only ones that have promised ranges of 300-plus miles per charge, while others can only provide 250-289 miles per charge. The next concern is maintenance not having an engine, transmission, or a physical connection for an all-wheel drive as such creates less stress the fewer parts the better until the battery dies. Cost Most new EVs are very expensive you would assume since they take fewer parts to make the cost would be reduced but that is not the case. The average price of a new EV is $38-$60k which is just for the standard class but for the premium class such as Tesla, Lucid, Audi, and more they start from around $60k-$80k or even $100K plus. Most new electric cars they are heavy on technology for many that is preferred like myself but for some, it can be overwhelming. Most EVs are completely operated via large immersive displays which are enticing at times but distracting most times, I am not saying there are not ICE vehicles out there with immersive displays that are just distracting one example: the 2023 S-class. At the end of the day, EVs do impact the plant via production and charging as do when their life cycle ends what happens to their heavy batteries. Evs still have a long way to go as do ICE even though they have been around for a century but for those who want to dip into EVs like myself, PHEV is a great alternative.
Tesla Model Y is $40k.
Tesla Model 3 is around $28k.
They aren't expensive.
It’s been documented in what happens to EV batteries after the battery has run it life cycle. Some get recycled and used in new battery cell production. Some get used in long term storage of excess electricity. It’s much like if you are throwing away your laptop you should bring the battery to a proper recycling plant and not just throw it in the trash.
@@FKS1994 The Model 3 starts at $40k but with EV incentives and saving drops to $28k so that’s a good starting point but moving up to a long range or performance model those start at $47k and $53k but with EV incentives and savings drops to $34K and $40k plus you have to include the choice the consumer chooses to purchased a vehicle most people, may finance or lease as well as purchase cash remember taxes plus fees.
@@99treb9 yes it is documented on the process of recycling old EVs batteries, but I’m sure a good portion of them still don’t get reused
@@gamelauncher9821 Average price of a new vehicle in U.S. is $47k. The Model 3 and Model Y are below that price. Obviously, upgrading to performance and long range can increase the price but the base models is what most people buy.
Financing, leasing, taxes, and any other fees happens with ICE vehicles as well so it's not exclusive to EV's which was ultimately what you were debating.
Fact :Non EV users have more range anxiety than actual EV users...Range anxiety disappears within weeks of starting to use an EV. Actually most EV users begin challenging themselves and their EVs to test the limit of the range by taking longer and longer rides in harder and harder terrains...the anxiety becomes thrill seeking experience. Of course, on some rare occassions range anxiety may happen if you have multiple exceptional scenarios...For example, the other day, I was getting less range(because of tyre pressures) and the charger I planned to reach was out of order...and then the second charger 20kms away stopped working for some issue 2 minutes after I plugged... I still reached the next charger...by riding very slowly with still some battery % left...but that was the first time I felt range anxiety in a year or so....but as I said these are extremely rare case...I reached safely even after 3 points of failures..and that's because I rode really slowly..and that's the beauty of EVs..you can double your usual range if you drive/ride very slow...which is more than enough not to leave you stranded.
more people would buy evs if the charging infrastructure wasn't dogshit
copium.
@@ockertoustesizem1234 The Tesla charging infrastructure is stellar. It's just the rest of the charging infrastructure that's dogshit.
@@BigBen621 i know
Whatnow? That's some seriously ignorant cognitive dissonance right there. Gasoline powered vehicles can fill up anywhere anytime in 5 minutes. I've been driving for decades and never once had range anxiety in any car I've driven. Never. Have you ever driven a car?
Interesting lab.
Do gas cars give same calmed mileage regardless or throttle changes, elevation change, traffic, etc? How can you expect Evs to give the same calmed range. It’s just an estimate.
The simplest way to get a real average would be to pull the data from say 100 different people in different circumstances living in different climates collectively you should be able to go to good sense of average highway and city numbers
I disagree. Standardized testing is the only real way for the consumer to compare one car to another. The tests are not intended to be a guide for the consumer as to how far they would be able to go on a single charge, but should enable the consumer to compare one vehicle's range to another.
@@Hans-gb4mv with a sample size large enough (as n approaches infinity), the statistical reliability of a measurement approaches 100%. All you need is to find the standard deviation, and with a sample size of just 2-3x that, you can be 99% confident that your estimate is accurate. It's basic statistics.
If you want to know real world milage for any of these there are a lot of tests done by people on ytube running cars from
100 percent to 0 on the same highway or course loops.
If you cannot control the variables, comparing the results would be irrelevant 🤔
absolutely - surely there's so much tracking these days that we can aggregate enough data to come up with some statistically sound real world numbers for different scenarios
Jessssus. Get a Tesla and no range anxiety. This is a term for companies that don't have charging infrastructure.
Epa tests average usage and by far most time spent by people is inside the city not on highways.
I want a real world test of range. With the batteries at 100%, drive from Columbus to Indianapolis on I70 at posted speed limits, with the AC or heat on like a normal person. To and back.
Teslas are rated at 110-129 mpge… if newer models are only getting 75% of epa range, I’d expect it to be closer to 85-100 mpge
Have Tesla Y = 330M spec range -> can make it driving 55, if to drive as usual 90-100 -> range closer to 160M
The problem is nobody is doing real world testing, it's all in a lab like the E.P.A. lab. Not realistic.
Real range test :
Bjørn Nyland, CZcamsr, Norway🇧🇻
Ice for Life
I'll support EV when law enforcement, fire and EMS make the switch. But they won't.
Weird comment. Do you wear body armor and carry around a defibrillator?
Hybrid cars seems to be the best as it can run in electric and petrol mode, people need not worry about running out of battery while traveling long distances. Electric cars take long time to recharge and this is very irritating when we want to go to some place very quickly or in an emergency. Hence car manufacturers must provide Hybrid cars instead of only making either electric or petrol cars.
Hybrid needs engine maintenance and usually they didn't have the most advanced electric power units like the battery and the motor. When you run out of the battery, the engine has to drag several hundreds KGs more of dead weight.
For comparison my Model 3 performance can charge 20-80% in 18 mins, my friend's hybrid requires 1.5 hours of charging to run 50ish miles. And when his battery ran out, the fuel consumption is higher than the other equivalent ICE vehicles.
There's tradeoff though. A plug-in hybrid, if only used for short trips, is carrying around an unnecessary combustion engine and wasting electricity. And EVs don't really "take a long time to charge" in a real-world sense if you can charge at home. You plug it in every evening, and have a full charge by morning. I do think hybrids have a place for at least the next 15-20 years in the USA (especially for those who cannot charge at home). Advancements are continually happening, we're getting higher battery densities at lower costs. Also, faster charging technologies are in active development. In 10-15 years, I wouldn't be surprised if we see non-luxury cars with 500 mile ranges and 10-80% charge times of 5-10 minutes.
And studies have shown that not many people plug in the hybrid nor do they invest in a home charger.
and yet they still cant get MPG/EV range right with all this high tech stuff.
rule of thumb for EVs
30F-95F subtract 15% off the EPA range
over 95F-100F 20% off the EPA range
over 100F 40-50% off the EPA range
youre welcome. an EV owner can figure this out better than the EPA does. they dont test things in the real world period.
seems about right, I live near California desert and no ev runs past 200 mi
I haven't been to a gasoline filling station in so long ever since I bought my Tesla. It's just a wonderful technology since I don't go on cross country trips. I fly for long distances and take uber. More convenient. My tesla is also faster than these hot rods so it's just a win/win kind of situation. My previous vehicle was a 427 edition Z06. The tesla is more fun by far.
If a Tesla, you have t assume only one half. If Elon say 400, it really means 200. Just cut in half.
Having done a few road trips using a Tesla, the range you get is generally similar to that of an ICE vehicle according to the EPA.
If you drive through middle America when the weather is calm and comfortable, you will get the EPA range, even at highway speeds. This is because it’s totally flat land, little wind resistance, and nice weather. Your gas car will get great MPG too.
But then when we both go up a mountain, we’re gonna burn more energy than going flat. Your range will not be close to what the EPA estimated. This is to be expected. The same happens in extreme weather.
With the number of chargers that exist, it’s not really a concern being able to do things in a timely manner. I can go to Sequoia National park and visit the trail of giants using my EV and make it back to charge with battery to spare. It’s not terrible.
You should mention that EVs don't need to drive to the service department.
Tell that to the people with broke down ev's.
What's the big deal about a 350-mile range EV? 350 miles is a distance greater than the distance between Raleigh, North Carolina and Savannah Georgia. Most people don't make that kind of a commute in a day, so with the potential for overnight charging at one's home or apartment: 350 miles should suit most people.
Personally, if I had to go 350+ miles to get somewhere: I would take a plane.
CAFE - never heard of that before. In some countries aggressive driving is 99% of the driving mode.
I would like to know what they consider as range.; The vehicle is at a dead stop in the middle of the road ? Nobody in their right would drive an ICE car like that. On my car I only need to see when the low fuel warning lite goes on and I am good for 50km. for sure at normal power.
I wonder if during their dynamometer tests simulating highway driving, if they account for wind resistance, which has a huge impact on range, and its magnitude varies depending on the car’ aerodynamics.
Here’s another factor that enters into play. Do they drive it until the battery runs out, or do they drive it until the indicator on the display says 0%? Because different manufacturers have different degrees margins of safety after you hit zero. My understanding is the Tesla has a higher margin than most. That could make it seem like it had a longer range than what most people experience because they don’t ever let it get down below zero.
Another factor that affects mileage is head and tail winds. My brother experienced a strong headwind on a long distance trip, and it had a dramatic affect on his mileage.
Stopping and going in traffic with lights and stop signs degrades performance in an EV, even with regenerative braking. Cities with a high density of lights and stop signs are going to give poor battery mileage results compared to those with fewer of them.
There really should be three tests, heavy city stop and go, light stop and go on country roads without high speeds, and high speed highway driving.
Being heavy on the accelerator pedal brings down mileage in an EV just like it does in a gas car.
Probably the biggest impact on EV mileage is going up a hill. If you’re climbing up into the mountains, your mileage is going to drop way way way down. Conversely, coming back down, you may actually recharge your battery a little.
Battery degradation is a factor too. I don’t think we have a very good handle yet on how fast EV batteries degrade.
I wonder about the highway surface. It sure seems like very nice smooth pavements produce better mileage than rough chain-damaged highways.
Super hot days with A/C on makes a big difference, as I’m sure super cold days do.
Yeah they should be. They can calculate the total driving resistance at speed by performing a coastdown test. Then on the dyno, they can simulate the driving resistance by applying the applicable load wheel torque.
@@brianwong6195 on the other hand they could do a wind tunnel test,calculate coefficient of friction and calculate the drag at different speeds. Also publish the coefficient of friction so we can compare one to another as part of our consideration of which vehicle to buy.
ICE engines only have about 30% effiency. I doubt the mpg falls as much going uphill as the mpkwh falls in an EV. In ICE the efficiency loss swamps everything else.
And, in cold, that waste heat from ICE is free heat.
@@andrewbell8837 Well that's one use case of EPA range numbers - a relative comparison between different cars. They use common drivecycle that all mfg test against. Does it mean you will get the EPA numbers? Maybe not, BUT they are a fair comparison between all cars.
The testers know all this stuff
It’s not that the ranges may be inaccurate, they are inaccurate. This has been tested by multiple people & the estimated range is on average 20% more than it actually is. This is not the case with ICE vehicles. This EV manufacturers need to stop this. Stop testing this stuff in a lab & do a real world test instead, because the numbers you get in a lab with no wind resistance or grade changes is not going to be accurate at all, as well as not placing any people in the vehicles. Also, they need a separate City/Highway range for all EVs, not listing this is simply irresponsible.
my Prius says i can get 550 miles but never do ?
Electric bikes and walkable neighbourhoods are greener than electric cars.
We should have all of the above. Safe bicycle paths, walkable neighborhoods with access to things people actually need, and electric cars when traveling longer distances.
Yes, but walkable neighborhoods are largely fantasies in the USA due to past zoning mistakes. If every municipality decided today to rectify this, it'd take 50 years to reverse those mistakes affordably.
@@Justinforsure yup, we're all stuck in that American mentality though that we need to go everywhere in a 4 to 6000 lb box
For a lot of suburbs, building multiple bike paths is difficult as everyone is spread out. Putting a lot of bikes on busy roads will not work
@@sevenflashowls The suburbs as they exist now, shouldn't. They are a cancer and contributes to bad city design, urban sprawl, and trafic.
wow
HMm, with the ability to send data to manufacturer why don't we use real drivers results to create a real world result? I assume once you get a few hundred cars running you might get a good sample.
What we need is a chart, not a single number.
There is temperature and speed.
Given temperature gives additional stress on the battery for heating and cooling. Test done at 20 degrees is max range, as most humans feel not need for heating or cooling at that temperature.
As for speed, there is simple math - rolling resistance (depended on vehicle mass) + air drag (depended on speed cubed). It comes out that at 20 degrees car going 130km/h needs twice the power than car going 100, which again needs the double than car going 80. So that is why most EV are limited to 130.
FYI, porsche does the 2 cycle with tht 0.7 factor, hence the published range is low but real world is higher. Tesla does the 5 cycle or multi cycle, hence they get lesser range than published in real world
Ill gust live in the same place i eork and buy an Ebike
Costs less than 4 tires (that are mandatory to buy every 4 years) vs a one time buy and 1,500mpge
My Tesla tires are eleven years old. Should I buy new ones? It's never been to the shop so maybe I should call them or better yet, wait until my car tells me I need new tires. Ebikes are cool. Really cool.
@@bingosunnoon9341 yeah, I've never been a car guy.
Then I learned about Tesla and fell in love.
Then I learned about how car culture is expensive (the 2 most expensive things you'll buy is a car and a house, road maintenance is paid for through Ponzi scheme growth, and 8 parking spaces per person that was bought by car lobbyists and paid for by the business that small businesses cant afford so there's no competition or walkability)
I find it really sad that every American loves the mall and Disney World, a place where there is no cars within but every American says that they would never give up their car.
EV's aren't just worse on the highway. They are abysmal on the highway. Range anxiety is not a thing. Its time anxiety. When you factor in the time, the cost per mile highway on an EV is roughly equivalent to a 1 ton gas truck. It is atrocious. EV's are great in the City, being roughly on par with 25+ mile all electric range PHEV's. Hybrids continue to be the lowest total city and highway cost per mile vehicles. Additionally performing cold and hot tests would greatly lower EV city and highway and PHEV city only economy. ICE and Hybrids will mostly retain their numbers. The EPA should rate in cost per mile and just use the national average kWh, gas, and diesel prices at the time, and should definitely factor in time for highway. It is not apples to apples to allow the EV to take a 30 minute break to charge every couple hundred miles while requiring the Hybrid, PHEV, and ICE to mush on. Total time of trip matters.
Um the file video at the beginning is just water
Just tell people usable battery capacity, and efficiency at different speeds and temperatures.
Tell me which ICE EPA rating is absolutely correct? There is NONE!!!
I've found Model Y to be accurate to 1 percent of predicted range over 200 miles on longer drives. It has greater accuracy on shorter ones. I don't use the miles remaining often, but this makes it within one mile of accuracy on a 50 mile trip. I consider this to be highly accurate and more accurate than any of the other three EV:s I have driven.
I never knew that Tesla was a type of EV range.
New Tesla model 3 Long Range : 420 miles range...
We need our nano back
EVs don't emit pollutants when they are being driven, but they do emit pollutants when they are produced, charged and recycled.
Gas cars also emit pollutants while being produced, re-fueled, and recycled just in different ways
Still way less than the production of a full EV
@brandontierney9489 there's a detailed video from Engineering Explained which compares the pollution from production and running long-term for both ICEVs and EVs.
czcams.com/video/6RhtiPefVzML/video.html
@@JetJiles Hence, use public transportation or work from home when possible.
But overall, over the lifespan of a vehicle, those total pollutants are much much less than that of a combustion vehicle. And technically, there is one often-over looked pollutant -- brake dust. But regenerative braking doing most of the slowing down of EVs gives of much less brake dust than a combustion vehicle (despite EVs being heavier to comparably-sized combustion vehicles).
Good now Toyota should make a Sienna EV.
owning a reliable hybrid car (Toyota Camry) is the best of both worlds without compromising range, battery & maintenance cost, or fuel economy! 😂
I'll still have to do more maintenance than a regular ev, but a regular ev will cost more to replace the battery
@@RyansTechReviews29don't forget the motors, those will fail after 100k miles.
My diesel 1500 Sierra blew epa rating out of the water. Could do almost 700 miles on a single tank. 35mpg on the highway and low 20s in the city.
@@cerisem7727 No they won't, electric motors are rock-solid. I think some of Teslas very early designs didn't always hold up well long-term, but those issues are in the past. And very few EVs will ever need new batteries. The batteries that need replacing are generally caused by manufacturing defects, and are generally caught before the warranty period has elapsed. Manufacturing is getting better all the time. And no, batteries will not need to be replaced due to degradation -- that's not a thing any more (you're thinking of Nissan LEAFs, which passively air-cooled their batteries). Everyone liquid cools their batteries now, and after reducing to about 85% of their original range over 5-10 years, they'll stay there for the rest of the cars general lifespan. Battery capacity will drop slowly, but most cars will be junked before the battery holds such little charge that it's not useful to either its current owner or a downmarket owner who finds the range acceptable. So much more can go wrong in a combustion car due to the increased complexities. EVs are able to get rid of so many complex systems. Now there's fewer complex systems, though there's still plenty of complexity.
@@cerisem7727just like, I don't know, look stuff up before you post randomness on the internet.
Ev's ranges are dramatically exaggerated offical figure's are no where near actual range in daily driving especially in adverse weather ev's have a place in motoring but are no where near ready to replace ice when everything is taken into consideration rushing ev's is the wrong way forward and the 2030 ban in new ice cars is madness no doubt most of them or their components will be made in China currently ev's are also way too expensive for everyday folk and they're no more environmentally friendly than ice unless you drive massive mileage even then it's not clear politicians need to rethink
Current Tesla is like Iphone 1. I’ll wait like 10+ more years to have better perfect product
world won't last that long. I'll drive the old Volvo til the world dies, and you and me with it.
Agreed, the tech is still too sketchy…
wow, the doomer takes in this thread. only 2 countries in the world are responsible for half of global carbon footprint, it’s not an impossible goal, we just gotta convince irresponsible and stupid doomers.
Yeah, I have the same feeling about cars. That's why I still have a horse.
I have no problem with ev. They work well for some people, and they don’t work for others. My problem is that people are pushing ev onto people. It should be an option to buy an ev, there should also be hybrid, PHEV, and gasoline cars available to buy as well.
I totally agree. Do not shove EV down the peoples throats! Give them options.
You have options now, your don’t have to. It an EV, but there are always future regulations or we would all still be driving Slant 6 and 426 Hemis. Things evolve.
You have all of those options right now. We're talking at least 15 years until pure ICE is eliminated for consumers (and plugless hybrids maybe a decade after that, so 25 years). Until infrastructure and charging speed improves greatly (which they will), I think PHEVs will make sense for most people for a long time. But man, let me tell you... if you can charge at home, a BEV can't be beat.
Until 2035 manufacturers can make all types of cars. You will be able to buy NEW until then, but there will be fewer and fewer choices as people decide electric is better. For some needs it will be a decade before electric is better, so buy something else until then. Shouldn't be a problem. Eventually, in a few decades, gas cars will have range anxiety as filling stations become scarce.
What’s most ridiculous is that there’s no infrastructure for the EV agenda they’re pushing. It’s a classic liberal tactic - superficial idea but once you scratch the surface there’s no substance to it…
They aren't wonderful for gas cars either. Electric cars are much better in town than on the highway. Even with the large battery's today I don't
see how they can run these more than 4 hours on cars with a claimed 300 miles range.
On a road trip, most people like to stop about every two hours to use the bathroom, stretch their legs, and grab a snack or meal. With a better charging infrastructure, and faster charging cars (like the 800V cars that do 10-80% in about 20 minutes in the warmer months), there's not much need for a car with more than 300 miles of range. 300 miles really is the sweet spot in my opinion. Unless you're a road-warrior always doing long hauls, any more battery than this is just going to be a drain on efficiency due to the increased weight of the battery.
This proto - industrial system was thus part of a network of commercial exchanges. It was controlled by members and goods were produced by a vast number of producers working within their family farms,not in factories. At each stage of production 20 to,25. Workers were employed by each merchants. This meant that each clothier was controlling hundreds of workers. 👍👍👍👍👍
I just completed a cross-country round trip, I think the US needs to examine dropping the speed limit closer to where it was in the 1980s. Save lives and energy.
The car companies should have to PAY and PROVIDE the FUNDS for the expansion and TESTING of ALL MODELS AND UPDATES!!! And ONLY USE the EPA Numbers. THAT would make it fair for ALL.
Future is EV'S 🎉
The heavier your foot the less range you have.
the music is TOOO loudd!
Most people don't appreciate how much money they can save by purchasing an EV versus a gas car, especially with the new tax credits. No maintenance and electricity costs are about 30 percent of what gasoline costs. Range anxiety is manageable with a bit of planning and research for charge points.
@@bryanholbrookwilliamschevroletI have had a Nissan Leaf since 2015. In that time I replaced the wiper blades, the tires, and a 9 V battery. Before that I had a Honda Civic. CV joints, clutch, full exhaust system (three times), numerous oil changes, brakes (the Leaf has regenerative braking, pads don’t wear). Must be about five more things I am forgetting.
@@bryanholbrookwilliamschevrolet yes he's right, I've been driving NexonEV in India, there's barely any maintenance unless your driving aggressively, probably I paid 100$ in last 2 years for service.
because of power regeneration in these EVs there more life left in brake pads and tires too.
the only problem early adopters are facing is charging infrastructure.
If saving money is your concern, you're probably a lot better off buying a 15 year old Corolla or Civic. EVs have a place, but they don't make sense for everyone. If I want to take my wife to Red Lobster for her birthday, I'm looking at a 400 mile round trip in likely sub zero temps on mostly interstate posted at 80mph. This means I would likely have to stop to charge on the way there and the way back adding hours to the trip. No thanks.
@@wirebrush HOW MUCH YOU PAY GOVT FOR OWNING A GASOLINE CAR...
To buy a car priced 15,000$
1)You need to earn -21,420$
Because Income tax takes away - 6,420$
of the car price, company & dealer get- 9,800$
Because taxes take away- 5,200$
If you drive the car for 1 lakh km you use fuel worth -7,550$
2)To fund that you need to earn -10,780$
Because Income tax takes away- 3,230$
of the fuel cost, taxes take away -3,920$
Income you need to own & use car (1+2) - 32,200$
Total tax govt collected on your car ownership comes to 58% - 18,780$
@@wirebrush for EV, because of insensitive and subsidy we pay just 5% to government, we got more than what we paid for, throwing money any fool can do
Terrible remote interview audio☹️ Please do better.
Basically what this tells me is EPA doesn't know how to test these things.
Give the same job to an independent company and results will improve drastically !
Until then, maybe we could have EV users update their data into chatgpt or smg and we can run an algorithm to provide an actual estimate based on where you live.
The EPA hires very intelligent people and they have a long history of doing a fabulous job (despite the attacks from republicans).
A private company would be under assault from the Fox News fanatics, they would not be capable of doing a good job.
You should do that. Algorithms are only arithmetic.
Its very bad if u store it outside
Some batteries are not supposed to be fully charged and fully drained. 20-80%
old tech. from 2018 onwards you don't have that
@@martirudaeven on the new teslas they recommend you don’t charge them past 90%
@@martiruda hmmm. My friend just bought a new model Y Tesla and they told him not to fully charge and discharge it. Owner manual said full discharging cam cause damage. The Tesla Model Y owners manual recommends setting the charge limit to 90% for daily use. This will minimise degradation and preserve the longevity of the battery. Occasional charging of the battery to 100% to maximise the car's range for longer trips should not cause significant degradation of the battery
@@mongo64071 Depends on which battery you have. Standard range has Iron phosphate- needs to be charged to 100% at least once a week. The LR and Performance trims have Nickle Cobalt formulation. Charging to 75% is ideal, and should not charge above 90% unless specifically needed for a long trip. The wear curve really picks up pace when going below 20% for either formulation.
@@constantbuzz after my friend got his model y I looked at one online in inventory and called the sales person at Tesla. They said they couldn’t tell me which battery type was in the in stock car until after I bought it. That sounds bizarre.
Its not hard. Theres external factors that are out of the manufacturers control. It wil always be an estimate
I don’t plan on getting an electric car because the infrastructure is not there and they are not as good as gas powered cars. For instance the heat and cold affects the range but with gas cars there is no guess work.
I race you with my EV in any ICE car you own I know i will win
My EV is already better than any ICE car ever made.
@@rory-red Shows how stupid EV Drivers are. Its not about racing. Its how well they handle long drives and the heat and the cold and sitting in traffic not moving for long periods of time. Get a life dude.
@@bingosunnoon9341 Yea no its not. I put no faith in EV's as they are all POS's. They do not do well in the heat or the cold and they are a pain in the butt to deal with. Perhaps in 15-20 years they will be better but for now no thanks.
you cant test it on a dyno... where is the wind and hills ?
That's why you test it on a dyno, to remove the dozen or more variables of real-world driving. This way they can run the tests a few times, instead of hundreds of times in order to average out the variability of real-world driving. Then, they apply a correction factor to bring it closer to real-world conditions (currently 0.7).