"Legal Expert" Turns A Traffic Stop Into An Arrest For No Reason
Vložit
- čas přidán 18. 10. 2023
- Spotify: spoti.fi/439TpHT
Second Channel: / @johnlang6593
Patreon: / audittheaudit
Twitter: / audittheaudit
Submit your videos here: auditheaudit@gmail.com
Sponsorship inquiries: audit@ellify.com
Welcome to Audit the Audit, where we sort out the who and what and the right and wrong of police interactions. Help us grow and educate more citizens and officers on the proper officer interaction conduct by liking this video and/or subscribing.
This video is for educational purposes and is in no way intended to provoke, incite, or shock the viewer. This video was created to educate citizens on constitutionally protected activities and emphasize the importance that legal action plays in constitutional activism.
Bear in mind that the facts presented in my videos are not indicative of my personal opinion, and I do not always agree with the outcome, people, or judgements of any interaction. My videos should not be construed as legal advice, they are merely a presentation of facts as I understand them.
FAIR USE
This video falls under fair use protection as it has been manipulated for educational purposes with the addition of commentary. This video is complementary to illustrate the educational value of the information being delivered through the commentary and has inherently changed the value, audience and intention of the original video.
Original video: • Driver Demands On Call...
Real Body Cams’ channel: / @realbodycams
Sources:
Court records- bit.ly/3NXSIeb
Pennsylvania v. Mimms- bit.ly/39nFjsF
Okla. Stat. tit. 21 § 268- bit.ly/44dhvBQ
Reams v. State- bit.ly/3rl41FB
Okla. Stat. tit. 21 § 540- bit.ly/3XJlKTe
Tucker v. Oklahoma City- bit.ly/44Its2m
State v. Nelson- bit.ly/3O2oSFu
Okla. Stat. tit. 47 § 12-206- bit.ly/43w6GJZ
Thornton v. United States- bit.ly/3WUcmM5
U.S. v. Cone- bit.ly/3NTBRsW
Graham v. Connor- bit.ly/3vk7YaX
Mecham v. Frazier- bit.ly/46V4Bdu
Helvie v. Jenkins- bit.ly/44A0Qsy
Davis v. Clifford- bit.ly/3Ola6e8
Imagine being a police officer that gets an A on one of these videos. I'd put it on my resume.
Not very hard to do. You can get an A if you threaten a cyclist with a K9 for a burnt out light. The standard is very low on this channel.
@@nativeboy36which vid is that?
@@nativeboy36 I'm not going to lie sometimes I disagree with the grades on here but for the most part most of the time they are Fairly graded. The video you speaking of I have not seen it, I'm curious what video it is.
Part of the issue is that I think ATA is being as objective as possible. The problem is that police are held to such a low standard and their policies are so lenient that an officer can technically do nothing wrong even if the interaction and their treatment of people is horrifying and infuriating, if that makes sense.
Something I always think about in situations like this is how some departments needed to implement policies prohibiting officers from having sex with their detainees. Excluding the obvious, I can’t think of a single other job that you could possibly think it’s ok to have sex with anybody on the clock and very likely in company property (their cruiser), much less a situation with a power dynamic like an officer and a detainee which is a situation that’s impossible to properly consent. How can something like this happen so often a policy needed to be created? I mean imagine just these two possibilities:
A: Cop says if we have sex I’ll let you go or drop some charges, suspect agrees. They finish and cop continues to take them to jail, cop lied.
B: Cop and suspect have consensual sex with no expectation of quid pro quo, they finish, later suspect accuses cop of rape.
The video being referred to above is one where a cop tried to pull over a bicycle for not having a white light at night and the guy kept riding and the cop got out and tackled the rider to the ground and separated his shoulder (the cop's shoulder) and added the felony charge of something like resisting causing bodily harm to a cop or something like that along with eluding and another charge or 2 that were technically justified and the cop got a good grade while the rider got an F. In all technicalities the cop did legally allowed things but pretty clearly used a bit of excessive force and got injured by the choice to tackle that he made instead of trying to grab and stop instead. There were a lot of comments on the video that said the cop deserved a much worse grade for tackling as a first option and adding as many charges as possible to a guy who didn't pull over for not having a bicycle light. I suppose technically the cop deserved like a B but got a higher grade and people didn't like it. I would say he deserved a C because that's average and being excessive as a first option is average for police and often justified legally.
"Call the FBI" is the craziest thing I have ever heard over a alleged brake light out.
He wanted the FBI because he was being illegally arrested. The brake light worked… 15:12
He's a sovereign citizen, they often say things like "call the sheriff" or "call the ___" in this case the fbi
@@Iam_Dunnhe hadn't been arrested at that point at all and if he did think anything in this situation was done improperly, you fight that in court, not on the side of the road. And definitely not with the fbi which wouldn't even have jurisdiction here because of the 10th ammendment.
Also the brake light was only the initial issue. He clearly stated he didn't have a driver's license (because he's a sovereign citizen), that's why he was asked to step out of the vehicle and then he refused. He brought the situation on himself.
he probably heard in a youtube clip someone wanting to talk to a supervisor and went from there
@@SpencerfromEarthThe 1's I've watched ,they always say over & over that their ' sovereign ' citizens . So IDK about this guy .
I was stopped in a convenience store parking lot for the exact same thing. I carry bulbs, and fuses. I acknowledged the officer observation and said I wasn’t aware it was out, but could correct it. The officer used her flashlight to aid me. I thanked her and we both moved on. We say hi when we see each other now.
It can be that simple and should be that simple.
I was pulled over for a "third brake light out". I knew it wasn't out because I had just replaced all of my car's lights a week prior. Additionally, the third brake light was not a single bulb, but five bulbs connected in parallel. Veey unlikely chance that all five brand new bulbs had burned out in one week. I didn't argue it. I received my ticket and went to court. I FOIA requested the dashcam from the officer's patrol vehicle. Footage showed all of my brake lights working. Citation was immediately dropped.
Nice story Tom but you’re the .01%. The other 99.99% of the time police are fishing.
@@jpz5173 same town, different officer stopped me for speeding; I was by 12 miles/hr. He asked for my license only. I had a three year old in the back. Let me go with a verbal warning and a smile. Maybe spending my life as a social worker taught me how to relate to people, maybe this town really hires good people and trains them well. I’ve had very negative interactions with cops also, especially when I call them for help. I’m done with that, and won’t purposely jam up anyone with a cop call.
@@exisfohdr3904 Couldn't you have reported or filed a complaint against the officer?
At least leave a paper trail for anyone else they falsely accuse.
Clearly the cops only got an A- because they didn't call the FBI.
Right? They should’ve definitely called the FBI and DOJ for him
I thought it was because the third brake light was actually working. You can see it at 15:12.
@@cjoller2701 Why? The FBI/DOJ don't exist lol.
@@AUSTIN-ss2zd oh they exist… they only work for democrats
I only answer to the President himself!
I encourage people to use their rights however, I encourage people to actually know their rights.
💯. "That's against my first amendment!" 😂
If you are in the drivers seat & get pulled over, you do have to ID. If he had just done that, he probably would have got a fix it ticket.
Thank you, Brent.
Sorry for not being versed in what the king allows. Oh, go to HELL.
I'm pretty sure my rights are whatever I assert with confidence they are....
"first amendment fourth amendment etc etc."
Spoken like a true CZcams researcher
Wrong, youtube researcher would not be this dumb.
Like you?
@@mattbrown5511 No?
I'm not the one who spewed half coherent nonsense acting like it's my right to be an entitled baby lol.
I'm no boot licker, but this dude was an idiot and the cops handled it fine
The great thing about CZcams is anyone can upload. The worst thing about CZcams is anyone can upload.
We the people etc etc
While driving VW bus in my hippie youth, a cop pulled me over. I immediately started to rant about why a cop would waste taxpayers’ money pulling over a vehicle that couldn’t possibly break the speed limit if it tried and why he wasn’t chasing perverts and real criminals. He stood there quietly listening to me go on and on until I ran out of shit to say then, he calmly said, “I pulled you over to tell you your engine is on fire.”
For real?
😂😅😅😂 seriously??
Impressive! I've driven (maybe) impaired once or twice (where's the wink wink emoji?) but NEVER so fu*ked up that I wouldn't have noticed that my engine was on fire. Please forward the name and number of the guy you bought that from - gotta get me some of that! 😂😂
Great!!!
Good one 😂
I couldn't stop facepalming when he was calling on his 1st amendment rights. Unfortunately if you're gonna stand up to cops you have to know your stuff 100%.
Yep, you do, because most cops know almost nothing about the law.
@@MrEkzoticexactly MOST there's always a chance the officer knows his stuff which means you should always be prepared during an interaction.
That's the problem it shouldn't be necessary for you "to know your stuff 100%". It's real simple no victim no crime. But we've had the wool pulled over our eyes. Made to believe that we have to follow all arbitrary rules and regulations someone at some point in time wrote down somewhere.
From "The End of all Evil":
Truth is always simple. All people recognize truth because all people are intelligent beings. It is the nature of evil to create artificially complex ideas. It does this to hide or obfuscate the freedom it destroys.
At least 50%😂😂
@@endemion06463you’re right they go after our great booze cruisers even when they didn’t harm no one
I laughed out loud at his statement that “you’re violating my first amendment rights”. Yes. A broken taillight is an expression. A work of art, really. Nobody can ever take that away from you.
I once told an officer that I didnt use my blinker because I didnt want to tell nosey people where I was going. So, I do somewhat see how thats expressive, lol
Performance art.
@@waltwoodward-np2qg “Sir, why didn’t you stop at the stop sign back there?”
“Officer, do ~you~ believe everything you read?”
If he can prove his religion requires a broken taillight he might have a case 😂
I laughed out loud when he said call the FBI
"You're gonna have to call the FBI." I'm fucking dead 😂
Dude turned a verbal warning, or at worst a "fix it" ticket, into an arrest and criminal charges.🤣
That tends to happen when you're just smart enough to be an absolute idiot. Dude would be dangerous, if he had half a brain.😂
That's truly impressive. I am willing to bet the Officer would've gave him a "fix it" ticket and then they both would've gone on with their day. But, nope. This guy decided to take the law into his own hands thus making himself look like an idiot.
I can't believe that the body camera failed to call the FBI when the suspect told it to.
This legal scholar turned a warning/small fine into thousands of dollars in legal fees and court costs. BRILLIANT!
We call that idiot alchemy 😂
Just comply comrade. Welcome to the United Communist States of America.
Dunning-Kruger is amazing.
Ya, but he defended our 1st amendment…etc etc etc
@@The_Bugsy_Show🤣 damn it that 'etc etc' is gonna make me laugh every time I'm reminded of it rofl
I sincerely appreciate the range of police interactions you provide, showing videos of both parties acting like fools.
Unlike lackluster lmao
I wouldn't call it a range. It's more of a 20 to one bad encounters vs good encounters. He just throws a crumb out once in a while in order to claim he's not biased.
@@favoritesfavorites6451I would argue he is the least biased police content channel out there, save for maybe code blue cam who has barely any commentary
Bootlicking the bootlicker, that is a new one.
@phillipwhite8463 you like echo chambers huh.. I know this guy running for president that sells trading cards, you should buy some, your kinda crowd.
"1st Amendment, 4th Amendment. Whatever." "Then I would like you to call the FBI" This man is a rocket surgeon.
You should make playlists organized by states, since you’re very good about finding laws based on where police encounters occur.
Anyone else feel more confident in their own police encounters after watching this channel?
I just put my hands on the wheel where they can see them. Have my papers ready. Be polite and agree with everything they said I did. I also keep my papers in a trump wallet bc cops love trump. I have been pulled over a lot and never once got a ticket always a warning.
@@jhuntley575If you agree with everything they say you did, it can be held against you. No need to talk.
Not really, I always legally carry a gun. (I don’t have to tell the police, but… it might be a good idea depending on the cops attitude) so my stops always have a 50% chance to go sideways.
But I record every interaction just in case. And this channel made me look up all the traffic/gun laws I have questions on.
@@jhuntley575 I can get pull over a thousand times, and I would never hav anything associated with that traitor near my body.
@@jhuntley575Trump wallet 🤔 good idea
Having some knowledge and applying it incorrectly is often more reckless and dangerous than having no knowledge at all. This guy deserves everything he got.
💯
Seems like he a good reason to try anything to get away 😅
@@Defy5he had a better chance of getting away if he cooperated from the start he might of only got a warning from the officer about his vehicle brake light needing replacing
what part of "1st amendment, 4th amendment, etc etc" do you not understand?
He was likely looking at a warning or fix-it ticket had he not tried to block or obstruct them at every turn. I could see saying it isn’t a stop if you were legally parked somewhere for 5 minutes before the police rolled up, but “I turned off the road seconds before your lights went on” doesn’t work for that.
Lmao at the guy yelling "bodycam, call the FBI", "dispatch, call the FBI".
I don't always agree with the grade you assigned but I gotta say that this one is spot on! Thank you for consistently posting these videos. They are very entertaining and educational.
It feel like the officer was originally just giving him a warning to fix his lights.. and he escalated it to a whole other level by wanting to be difficult. He was seeking a problem and promptly found one.
It’s amazing how playing dumb can get you out of tickets. Not this dumb though.
100%, the officer's tone from the start was impeccably polite. I'd put good money on this being a warning to get his 3rd brake light fixed and then he'd be on his way. WTF is this jabroni on?
That is what people are saying, he probably was only going to get a verbal warning, a courtesy "hey man one of your 3 brake lights are out, if another goes that will be a ticket best get that fixed soon. Have a nice night." Contrary to popular belief (and due in no small part to the media mostly just covering the bad things, the hot topic things police do) police can actually just be wanting to give you information about something when they pull you over. @@1SCme
@@1SCmeWatch the video again. If his vehicle is equipped with a 3rd brake light as original equipment it has to be functional.
At the 15:13 on the video, the brake light is working. Why was he really pulled over is my question.
As usual, you contine to crush it and remain unbiased. You are the golden standard of this kind of content, and your work is important for helping inform citizens, and hopefully police as well.
Thank you very much for what you do, and the hard work you put into it!
I like Lackluster better, but this channel is in my top three.
This channel is not unbiased because the fact he couldn’t give these cops an A+ but gave them an A- show his bias. Though I’m surprised this channel gave this citizen an F because I have seen this channel give sovereign citizens C and D before.
In a video where a girl driving on cocaine gets kidnapped by cops he doesn't mention they're kidnapping her.
@@MrEkzotic Lackluster leans towards ACAB to me. I might have to give him anothr chance.
@@AUSTIN-ss2zdwhat video? Couldnt they just arrest her. Why kidnap lol?
This is why I like this channel: You´re evaluating cases as fair as possible.
Feels weird seeing a cop that knows the constitution better then a citizen.
Or the law in general.
Based purely on what this channel publishes, in most cases where the officers have a better grasp of the law, the suspect is a sovereign citizen 😅
LEOs tend to know the constitution. They bend or ignore it at their own discretion. Typically using verbal phrases that allow them to have you give up your rights. And letting the courts settle it later. All in the name of expediency.
Oh, they know the Constitution and, most of the time, the law. However, they do lie about it or ignore it all the time!
He's a sovereign citizen, hardly counts
You’re not “home free” if you get to a parking lot or your own driveway before police actually stop you. This is hilarious!
I'm just imagining someone stepping over the line of their property saying, "Can't get meeee" and then jumping back and forth
LPT: Live next to a bank. If you can rob it and get back to your house before the cops arrest you you get to keep the money. If they give you any grief, call the FBI.
But if you can get inside your house, then you are home free. Sortof. Thanks to a relatively recent Supreme Court decision that says running from a traffic stop does not give cops the exigent circumstances that are required to break down your door without a warrant. But hey, you at least get a reprieve. Maybe they'll wake up a judge for the warrant, maybe not. As a cop friend once said "I ain't chasing someone across a highway and over fences all over a 15mph speeding infraction where they probably have a misdemeanor warrant or outstanding child support they're running from--we've got their car, and they're going to want it back. We'll pick 'em up then after they've calmed down".
If only he had been able to pull into a body shop and erase his wanted level.
I wonder what happens if you park and go into your house and 2 minutes later a cop pulls up with a traffic violation.
These tyrants should be fired and put in prison for life for violating his 1st Amendment right to demand they call the FBI and unlawfully addressed him when he was on base.
@invictusbp 1 prop143, The driver contends that the officer who stopped him must explain to him why he was stopped before surrendering his license. In general, law enforcement officers must have reasonable suspicion of a crime or traffic violation to make a motor vehicle stop. Unless there is a department policy, that the officer must inform the driver of why they were stopped. Technically the driver doesn't have the right to dictate to the officer that he's going to wait for a police supervisor or an FBI agent before surrendering his license. There is no law or case law that requires a police supervisor or an FBI agent to be present at the scene if a driver requests it.
U should add a 😂 smiley face at the end so dumb people know you're making a joke
Well done sir, I give you a grade of A+ for not recognizing sarcasm.@@robertortiz8540
@@rossrobertson674Or one of these 👌
@@spencertherren6806 👍
I absolutely love your channel dude.
Knowing which amendment is which, is a good first step for when you want to argue about them being denied.
Exactly. I'm not sure why he was asserting the 1st amendment.
"You are violating my first amendment rights"
"Your first amendment is freedom of speech sir"
I died 😂
Its not just freedom of speech, its the freedom to religion, press, assembly, and petition for redressing grievances.
I can't believe how long it took these guys to arrest this man. He's lucky he didn't get shots or something
Great work ATA
I get so frustrated by other channels like these because they will have their narrator do a voiceover, but they add absolutely nothing to the video and inserting their own opinions on the matter. ADA is so high quality with their very matter-of-fact and sterile narration that actually provides good context that been researched properly. 10/10 every time.
I know more about US laws than my own countries laws thanks to this channel haha
as an aussie, same lol
As a Texan samsies
Same
@@grantpowell4135isn’t Texas in America?😂😂
@@Gofftits69yes but our laws are different in every state. The cops are terrible in Texas because they can arrest you over traffic infractions. There's another channel that a retired cop has Good Luck America,I don't agree with everything he says but he's a wealth of knowledge. Rick Gore.
I laughed my ass off when he yelled call the FBI from the back seat. It’s also probably a good idea to know what each of the amendments are before trying to invoke one of them. Lol
i think the 5th Amendment would have worked pretty well for him in this case 😂
I think some of these people might have mental illness though. That makes it a lot less funny to me.
@@satekeeperI hate when people like you say dumb shit like this. The guy in the video showed signs being of sound mind and was punished for his actions accordingly.
Maybe you hate it because you aren't understanding. Mental illness isn't something that has effects that scream at full volume, as if all that exists is severe schizophrenia and psychosis or else being 100% fine. Loads of people with severe issues pass relatively unnoticed by others most of the time.
With this particular person, I do not know what is going on with them. Maybe nothing, maybe something. As a matter of maintaining good social order and peace (the goals of law enforcement) prevention and treatment often are far superior to trying to solve every problem with handcuffs and jail. That's really more of a North Korea solution.
@@silencedogood711
@@SeenGodcomedy Gold 🤣
Nice to see an interaction that demonstrates correct behavior by law enforcement. As always really enjoyed your analysis.
FBI shows up .... Step out of the car"
Suspect: I demand the US Army show up.
This channel is my favorite, while you do call out bad cops, you do also recognize the good cops, unlike some other channels.
I think the Good Auditors do recognize & point out the good cops . There just haven't been that many .
@vivianpatton5692 no, there are many good interactions online. The problem is they don't get views, so you have to dig for them. It's the nature of getting views online, rage and sensationalism will always draw views and multiple channels will cover those events. ATA is great because its all about the laws followed/missed and the knowledge of how they are applied.
lackluster 😂
There are no good cops. They are all guilty for every event their comrades (yes, those kinds of comrades) commit. If they actually stopped and arrested (publicly) those "bad cops", I might have some sympathy for the "good cops".
Anyone else ping back and forth between AtA, lackluster, and channels like Police Activity?
"I hate cops!"
"I feel sorry for cops!"
"Cops are tyrants!"
"I love cops!"
I like that you use statutes and court decisions that are local to the jurisdiction in question whenever possible. These videos must take an insane amount of research, and this sets you apart from other police interaction channels. Keep doing good work.
dude its fkn 100% unlikely that any PIG cop knows ANY case law, nor do they even know what case law is
I’m Canadian. I have yet to find a decent Canada auditing channel. The civilians think they’re all Americans and I’ve seen them try to invoke their constitutional rights. (We don’t have those)
The “defense” lawyers tell us that it “may violate the charter of rights & freedoms, but just obey the nice officer.”
However, according to statute 2.1 section 3.7...
@@madtabby66 There aren't any, due to Canada's laws surrounding privacy. It's rare for media outlets to get ahold of bodycam footage (usually only in very publicized cases), let alone CZcams channels. Usually most of the interrogation/bodycam footage released to the public comes from the CBC which usually releases it with little to no commentary (hence why Canadian footage is sometimes seen on these channels). AFAIK, this is due to research showing that publication of violent crime only encourages more violent crime in the area in which the initial crime occurred, along with our focus on rehabilitation (if someone's name is out there for something they did as a teenager 20 years ago, it makes it impossible for them to get a job.). Whether or not you agree w it is up to you ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
@@sydneatoThis is not true. You can use the Access to Information Act federally, and your provincial equivalent (eg Ontario's Freedom of Information and Protection of Privacy act) to request body cam footage. Also, any time a criminal charge occurs, the bodycam footage (if it exists) is part of the dislosure- at which time you are free to disseminate it as you wish unless a specific order by the court restricts you from doing so.
I was able to get every down to the transcripts that mentioned my friend over police radio during the G20 protest (we both got settlements as part of the class action, she has enough to file a separate case of higher $$ but didn't bother).
Spotify! Awesome! My wife and I love your channel and we’ve been saying you should get a podcast or something of the sort!
I’m glad to see the other side of a video from this channel with an A- for the police and an F for the person.
Thank you for sharing both good and bad police encounters.
More like good and bad citizen behavior.
This guy is a case study in what NOT to do after watching ATA.
Honestly this guys made me think something i never have before because he got me so aggrivated. This man really had me thinking "I get why some cops walk around pissed off all the time."
On the other hand , I believe, that the police had no real reason to tell him to get out other than to escalate and to establish dominance. Maybe they should have just written him a bunch of tickets. But he probably would have refused to ID and the same thing would have happened anyway.
@@markmixon1121Are you serious? Did you watch the entire video? The driver was intoxicated, driving with a suspended license, drugs etc.
@@mikewayne6608 to be honest I didn't watch the whole video.
@@markmixon1121 Thanks for being honest.
@@markmixon1121even if you didn't watch the whole thing, almost immediately he says he doesn't have an ID. Cops CANNOT let you drive away if you don't have a license.
This was very informative.
Poor guy is very confused. These cops are very patient.
Well , he Did have a ripped shirt .
He's a classic sovereign citizen, thinks he knows all the laws but doesn't understand any of them
He's drunk and potentially baked.
@@SpencerfromEarth you should brush up on the “classic” sovereign citizen. He didn’t engage in any of the typical SC behaviors. He was just ignorant, or was deliberately trying to get the cops to pull him out in the hopes of cashing in on a lawsuit.
@@GenXDaddyO he definitely was not a sovereign citizen
“Your third brake light is out”
“No it isn’t”
😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
But the most important question still stands...........
was the FBI called🧐😅
LT shows up to stop, officer tells him my supervisor just showed up
Ace legal scholar " Well them I'm gonna need a supervisor"
This dude needs to run for president.
Thank you! Exactly my thoughts when he said, "I'll arrest you for resisting." It's obstruction, not resisting.
It's nice to see that now that you are working with an actual lawyer you are more reasonable in your assessments of the interactions.
This guy needs to watch your channel more to better understand what his rights are exactly.
It is your first amendment right to touch home base. If you pull over before the lights go on that's like touching home base in tag so you can't be arrested. Read the constitution!
I see no reason to believe he would understand what he was watching, declaring 1st Amendment leads me to believe it would all be over his head.
Sovereign citizens like this guy never learn.
I'm amazed he didn't claim to be a sovereign citizen and also quite curious on what did he expected to accomplish by calling the fbi
I still have more respect for sov citizens than any cop.
Ai, a brake light is not required when we be travelling the black tarmac seas in our road ships
My guess, as misguided as this gentleman was, is that he wanted the FBI because the FBI investigate civil rights violations by the police. So he probably remembered some of that, but not all of it, kind of like him claiming 1st Amend when he meant 4th Amend, even though he was wrong on both accounts in that case. I'm just trying to infer what he was thinking, which is hard because he was way off base on so many things.
I’m more curious as to how he knew the phone number by heart 😂😂😂😂😂
@@kevinhamlin1561 but the FBI are the CIA and aren't so civil
"I'm gonna have to ask you to call the FBI"
Wow, just...wow.
the third break light is lit every time tyhe body cam shows it
Thank you so much for posting this. We need to see the difference between knowing your rights and watching a bunch of CZcams videos. This is why you're the one I trust the most. You post things without bias and explain every single detail about it with case law references. Thank you for all you do buddy!
He's one of the few channels I've ever seen that Praises cops when they're good and criticizes them when they're bad along with the people too many people just say either all cats are good or all cops are bad there's a lot of Grey
@@TheBeastDen365all cats are good tho😂
What I like most is the actual references to case law and highlighting them on the screen, and the acknowledgement of how subtle and conflicting some of it can be.
@@teridoster5840 i dunno, i have some pretty ruthless felines at my house, they’re cold-blooded killers 😂
This, ah... this IS a youtube video 🤨
My man is trying to claim home base but doesn't realize he's driving not playing baseball.
He’s trying to claim checkmate on the board while his move hangs the queen.
12:58 🤣 maybe he should have tried with "Alexa" 🤣🤣
Imagine thinking the FBI would be less currupt than a small town PD lmao
This is why I love this channel it shows the truth and has no biased opinions.
He couldn’t give the cops a A+ even when they did their job correctly. That’s right their is pure biased. I’m surprised he gave the citizen a F honestly because this channel is full of bias against police. I believe it very important to expose bad police behavior but I’m not at the point to be bias when I see a cop actually do he job correctly. The A- grade shows this channel bias.
"I'm going to ask that you call the FBI" 😂
Sir, this is Wendy's.
The funny thing about this story was that he wasn't even driving, he was travelling. If he told cop he was travelling, he probably would have been let go immediately.
🤦 just stop
I lost it when he asked for the FBI after a supervisor didn't allow him to get away with a misdemeanor... That's the manliest Karen I've ever seen
He’s using the first amendment when he should be using his right to remain silent 😂
I know, did he think they were going to stop him from filming even though they didn't even mention the phone.
I’m pretty sure he thought the first amendment protected him from illegal detentions
I was thinking the same thing. Lmao.
If I were the officer on scene, I have said, "Sir, it seems like you have a command of the first amendment, but you lack the knowledge and understanding of your first amendment rights. If I were you, I would exercise my fifth amendment right to remain silent." 😂
I don’t really think he had the capability of remaining silent at the point.
He should have just been normal and gotten a verbal warning
This is one of those "a little learning is a dangerous thing" situations. The guy had a vague, hazy idea that cops like to violate people's rights (often true), but didn't know what those rights are, let alone if the cops were violating them. Every time he said they were violating his _First_ Amendment rights, I winced. Meanwhile the cop at least knew enough to say that it was _case_ law that let him order the guy out.
Agree with your comment. PA vs Mimms is terrible case law. At the very minimum it should have required cops to be capable of articulating a reasonable basis for believing that the occupant is both armed and dangerous - which would be in-line with Terry vs Ohio regarding the basis for a frisk.
@@interestedparty00 Agreed, but in this case the guy not only refused to show ID, he sort-of said he didn't even have a license, which would be an arrestable offense. I'd be willing to bet that's the reason he ordered the guy out.
The thing is, the third light is on at 5:37, so the reason the cop gave for pulling the guy over was BS.
@@Bacteriophagebs Good catch on the light.
@@FJamison1 Someone pointed out that some trucks have the white reverse lights on either side of the third brake, and the video does make it look white, but those would only be on if the truck was in reverse, so I'm _pretty_ sure it's the brake light that's on.
He's a sovereign citizen
6:50, supervisor wasn’t enough, bro wanted the damn FBI💀
this is why i love channeps like this and auditors like long island audit. They don't just show the screwup cops, they will show the grewt ones and good interactions.
I live five thousand miles away and I still marvel at the fact that I know better what to do in a traffic stop in the USA than so many people there, often including the officers themselves. Congratulations on the impartiality of the channel, greetings from the other side of the pond!
I'm planning on traveling to the US to put my knowledge to the test.
@@aboner2551gotta get that 3 billion lawsuit before my visa expires
Hey now, these guys are just a very very annoying and vocal minority.
The moment I heard he wanted to see the FBI, I knew he was on drugs 😂
Nice to see a difference in who’s right and wrong.
lmao yelling at the bodycam and dispatch like he’s summoning Alexa.
"Body camera, call the FBI, aliens are impersonating police officers in Oklahoma! DISPATCH!"
I love it when Audit the Audit says "however"
What the actual f**k does the first amendment have to do with ANYTHING here!?
"I am going to ask that you call the FBI" "NO". This is my favorite part
These guys are super patient can’t help but feel like I’d have been ripped out of the vehicle by the time 7 minutes rolled around
Yeah I'm surprised this cop only got an A- I'm not sure I would have kept my composure as well with someone like that :p guess it's good I'm not a cop too
I was pulled over for a tail light out, but when I showed the officer I had the replacement bulb but no tools, he took the time to help me and sent me on my way. No ticket, no warning. A nice handshake. Never argue with police
Lol I can tell this cat grew up thinking he was something he’s not. 🤦🏾♂️🤣🤣 he even got the tone of voice down lmao.
i’ve been pulled over from a broken tail light & i never refused. the police officer gave me a ticket & said you have 30 days to fix it send proof & your ticket will be dismissed & that’s exactly what i did & no harm was caused.
Cops were surprisingly patient
ATA is a great way to start the day. Let’s sort out the who and what, and the right and wrong of police interactions. 😮
Someone is about to display a fundamental misunderstanding of something….
*Conga or bongo drums*
“I’ve been pretty reasonable the whole time” ha!…what a scream.
Great Job Edmond PD
I didn’t know it was possible to fail out of the CZcams School of Law, but this guy actually did.
Wow this dude did EVERYTHING wrong
yeah, the cops and the driver.
Nah, he could have snorted some coke, pulled and gun, and tried to flee. That would have been worse.
@@RedboneUnincorporatedwhat did the officers do wrong?
My man is speaking with the confidence of someone who doesn't know how dangerous his actions are.
You mean he acted just like so many cops that don't know the laws?
@@mattbrown5511 yes, exactly. That situation is MUCH more dangerous when you're NOT the cop!
Life’s hard. These folks make it sooo much harder. Amazing.
Why would a brake light out equal this?? Used to be back in my day, cops would pull you over and say you have a light out, get it taken care of. Now it's a criminal offence, like you just killed someone.
I love that the whole time the cop is arguing his 3rd light is out the other cops camera clearly shows his 3rd light working.
How is this not discussed in the video analysis?
@audittheaudit
Right? That third light is clearly on in several shots. That driver was definitely an idiot, but I feel like he was pulled over under false pretenses
So im not the only one that noticed. Yeah, pretty insane.
Brake lights aren't tail lights.
The officer said the third brake light was broken not out.
"Woah, woah easy fellas 🤠🤠" you should've thought about that before arguing about a legitimate equipment violation and refusing lawful orders 😂😂
insane how people still think they can call "base" when dealing with the cops. "Your lights weren't on" or "I was already parked" is basically the same thing as "you can't give me a ticket I'm in my driveway"
I've learned so much from this channel!!
Ditto my guy, I didn’t realize how many rights I have had violated by these race soldiers until I started watching these vids, in other words I just got “woke”. 4:49
Him shouting " dispatch call FBI!!!!! " was absolutely hilarious
I was speeding 150 in the 45. But I pulled into a private parking lot so now I didn’t speed. Yup that’s definitely how that works.
Lmao do you know how out of touch with reality you have to be to recommend calling the FBI for your traffic stop 😂
You’ve done *so much* to dispel misunderstandings with the law for every day citizens 🧡 thank you
Fight it in court, not in the streets.
We’re well beyond that point. Our courts are corrupted. Time to take action.
fighting in court is getting to the point where cops aren't being held accountable.
I commend the police officers for their patience and for providing enough opportunity to the driver. Great policing, thank you.
"Get me a supervisor"
"I am the supervisor"
"Then call the F.B.I"
WHAT???? LOLOLOLLOLOOOOL🤣🤣😂😂
I love the thorough and unbiased content on this channel.
Even after they went through all the hassle, the cops remained calm and composed.
I lost it when one of the cops said "That would've been helpful like 5mins ago, Sir"
who sent out the memo to "them" that all they have to do is be completely disrespectful to law enforcement if pulled over ?
The pig said he was resisting arrest although the pig did not state that the man was under arrest. For one to be charged with resisting arrest one must first be under arrest....
Rumor has it he still wants someone to call the FBI
LOL
"There # is 297... it's not that hard."
This guy may have some mental health issues...