It's here! INAV 7.0 RC1
Vložit
- čas přidán 22. 07. 2024
- 🔗 www.MrD-RC.com 🔗 / mrd_rc
In this video we take a look at INAV 7.0 RC1, if you should install it, what you may need to do if you do install it.
✈️ Contents ✈️
00:00 Introduction
00:29 Should you use INAV 7.0 RC1?
01:23 Where can you find the information for RC1?
01:50 How do you download INAV 7.0 RC1?
02:44 If you do use Release Candidates, make sure you keep up to date
03:24 Where to find the release notes
03:59 What are the major changes in INAV 7?
11:45 Other changes to be aware of
14:50 Where to report issues if you find any
16:03 Conclusion
Thank you for watching this video. Time is precious, so I hope that you got some benefit from this video. If you have any questions, please leave a comment and I'll do my best to answer. Please try to keep questions relevant to the video in, as they may also help others who have the same question.
✈️ In this video ✈️
🔗 Releases and reporting issues video: • INAV: The different re...
🔗 INAV Firmware GitHub: github.com/iNavFlight/inav
🔗 INAV Configurator GitHub: github.com/iNavFlight/inav-co...
✈️ Help other RC pilots find this video ✈️
If you found the video useful, I'd appreciate a thumbs up. This will help CZcams share this video with other RC pilots who may find it helpful. If you would like to get more videos when they become available, please subscribe and click the notifications bell icon. If there are links above, they may be affiliate links. If you click them, it will help me and my channel at no additional cost to you.
✈️ Supporting me and other resources ✈️
🛩 There are more tutorials on my web site at www.MrD-RC.com.
🛩 You can also join like-minded people at the Fixed Wing RC Rebels group and INAV Fixed Wing Group on Facebook.
🛩 Join the channel's discord server at / discord
🛩 Liking the video, subscribing, and clicking the bell icon can help greatly. This shows CZcams that the video is helpful, so it will be shown to more people, who may have the problem dealt with here.
🛩 If you found my video useful, you can become a Patreon at / mrd_rc
🛩 If you prefer, you could always buy me a Coffee at www.mrd-rc.com/go/ko-fi/
🛩 I also have merch at mrd-rc.creator-spring.com/ This include branded items as well as general fixed wing RC apparel.
Thank you for your time, and don't forget to fly it like you stole it!
#INAV #INAV7.0 #INAV7.0RC1 - Jak na to + styl
Once again Darrin, you do not fail to impress sir. Your thoroughness and delivery are spot on. I REALLY appreciate your contributions to our wonderful hobby sir.
I agree 💯 percent
Another clear, detailed and well explained video. Many thanks for your hard work and that of your co-developers. It is appreciated. For those who have not already done so, don't forget to support these guys and buy them a coffee.
I finally took the plunge and flashed iNav7 onto my Speedybee F405 v3 (after happily flying Betaflight 4.4.3), eager for features like RTH, cruise, and altitude hold. Unfortunately, my excitement took a nosedive within an hour.
During the first throttle test, a major malfunction sent shivers down my spine. Simply nudging the throttle up and back down caused the motors to go berserk. They kept revving uncontrollably, even with the stick firmly grounded at the lowest position. This happened with both Dshot300 and Dshot600 protocols.
Needless to say, my nerves were fried. Had I not been holding the drone down, it would have been a one-way trip towards oblivion! I promptly switched back to Betaflight, immensely grateful for the backup plan.
While iNav7's features still beckon, I'm giving it a few months for this experience to settle. Maybe then, I'll be brave enough to revisit it.
It sounds like your throttle bump was enough to activate airmode. If airmode is activated, that behaviour would be expected. Please don’t do tests like this with props on. Its not safe.
@@MrD I have Air mode always on with the Betaflight firmware on the same craft and that doesn't do this weird spin up. How can that be explained? With Betaflight, a nudge on the throttle is a blip of the rpm and that's that. Exact same physical conditions.
@Sleeperknot in INAV. airmode is permanently enabled too. But, there still has to be an activation trigger. If it is active on the ground, it will behave badly. In BF, that trigger may just be higher than in INAV. I’ve not checked the default settings for BF, as there’s not a nice document with the settings and their default values. Using BF as a direct comparison is not a good thing to do. Even similar systems can behave differently.
It sounds to me like your blip of the throttle is enough to trigger airmode, which then has problems because the quad is on the ground and it has been disturbed. In INAV, the throttle threshold to activate airmode is 1150us. So if your blip is over 15% throttle, airmode will activate. When the throttle is lowered it will try to stabilise the craft on the ground, as the air pushing against the ground has disturbed it.
[EDIT] I have found some CLI, but can’t guarantee these are the defaults. But it appears that BetaFlight doesn’t enable airmode until the first passing of 25% throttle. So that’s 10% higher than INAV.
If you want to be sure. Just disable airmode in INAV and see if the behaviour is still there.
Great news! Thanks for all the hard work....
Thanks JD 👍🏻
🎄 Merry Xmas ..another informative video thank you👍
Merry Christmas David 👍🏻🎄
I love the alignment tool. Beats using CLI for FC positioning.
New to all this and first of all thank you for all your hard work and videos on this. Got me back into the hobby and setting up my very first plane. That being said after the initial FW upgrade and reboot, it ask the type of device that will be configured and then it just sits there "saving default settings" how long does this take?
thanks man
Sounds good Darren. Will update in the future but I don't like the changes at the moment unless I'm hearing it wrong. Really like the idea of a quad auto tune but wish it was a full tune or full'ish tune. The "re-maping" stuff not a fan of.
Hi Darren, would it be possible to get a debian version of Inav 7 as I have great difficulty trying to install a Tar GZ version, Thanks.
Any set up videos coming for Inav Darren.
has the configuration for the DJI 03 Air Unit changed from when you spoke about it for iNav v6.0? I cannot seem to get it to work following those instructions.
No, it's the same.
Hi. "ahrs_inertia_comp_method" for multi-rotor platform selection ADAPTIVE or VELNED ? Thanks.
It looks like pre-INAV 7, multirotors used VELNED. But now in INAV 7 they also use ADAPTIVE.
Hey great news. Question about 6.1 that I have in my S800. There is little or no difference in travel between acro horizon angle or manual. Auto launch is a dive into the ground. Matek wmn on first fc with these issues Speedybee 405 wing on current fc. Same issues on both setups. Got it flying yesterday with a manual launch. Without flying fast it barely stayed in the air and loss of control. I had another S800 on Inav 5 and it flew great. Noticeable movement change between modes. It’s like once it’s in the air the travel on elevons is way less then on the bench. One other person mentioned this issue on same aircraft . Shelving it till the new release is out . I watch your videos only for my builds. Less confusing this or that howto. Thanks for your efforts in being part or the Inav team
I've replied in the INAV Fixed Wing group. Can you make a video of your throws in manual and post it there. Check out the comments about the linkages too. The supplied rods with the S800 bend quite easily.
Hi, nice Video
As a Survey Engineer I have to correct you on the GPS Topic.
1. The naming screme is wrong in Inav. It called everything related to positioning via Satellites GPS. That technical wrong. The over all name for those systems is GNSS (Global Navigation Sattelite System) - As a result the whole Menu should be called GNSS instead of GPS
2. GPS, GLONASS, Galileo and BeiDou are all GNSS Systems. Every System is recaiveble globally, implied by the name GNSS.
So you call out to activate the GNSS System thats based on you reagion is just WRONG. There are regional Sat Systems (QNZZ and a other one what name I forgot) but there are only above Japan and India, but that is out of topic here.
The right suggestion would be: Check what GNSS Systems are supported on your Recaiver and check it on in iNAV acordingly.
With you suggestion an American User would enable only GPS and would miss all the sattelites provides by the other GNSS Systems. That a huge diffence and would perfome like a 2004 Recaiver that only could prozess GPS. Today almost every Recaiver can at least prozess GPS and GLONASS, also called 2G. More modern Recaiver have 3G (Most of the time the 3rd G is Galileo) or the M10 Ships will have the Tag 4G and they can prozess all GNSS.
The positiv effect on having more GNSS Systems availeble should be obvious. More Sat to chose from - resulting in a faster and more stable "fix" Position.
I do not want to sound like a smart ass, but these the Topic of GNSS is always handeled with half knowlege and leeding to wrong settings to Users who does not know better.
Best Regards
Dave
@davidn7795 Yep you sound like a real smart arse.
There all selectable in the GPS area in Inav,have you even looked in there.
@@M-H433 I looked in there and they are all selecteble. Seems like you do not get the point of my critism. In the video Mr D is sayinig that you should select the GNSS that fits your region, what would be wrong and will cut your GNSS Recaiver performance dramaticly. All 4 GNSS listed are working globally and you should select the one that are supported with your recaiver. In most cases that would be 2G alias GPS and GLONASS. With a more modern Recaiver it would be 4G - resulting in selecting all 4 GNSS options.
Hi David,
Technically you are correct. The term should be GNSS. But, for people in day to day life, that acronym is pretty unknown. Whereas you say GPS and everyone knows what you’re talking about. It’s kind of like the Hoover/vacuum cleaner or Google/search engine situations. I guess it stuck because GPS was the first GNSS.
Pretty much all GPS modules you can buy in the hobby support GLONASS and Galileo. The former maybe not being so reliable at the moment. As from my understanding they were repositioned to focus on an area just east of Europe at the moment. That may or may not be true. Just something I’ve heard.
Hi @@MrD ,
thanks for your reaction.
That why I wrote the comment/critic.
Maybe a short explanation to reason myself for it.
GPS was the first GNSS Build bei the USA. Goal was a positioning system that works world wide. At first with a military background idea. That was archived and was open up to civil use in April 2001 for many reasons.
GLONASS was the 2nd GNSS System. The Russians whanted to have their own GNSS for the same reason. A GNSS that will work just fine on its own.
Now there are 2 GNSS up and running, availeble gloabal. The whole world are using it. And whole industries are relient on it. Big Player like the EU and China are afraid, that in some worse case scenarios maybe the USA or Russia will shut down their system in some way - > crippling GNSS in a whole. Resulting in a big blackmail potential. So the EU and China where eger to do their own GNSS, just to be not reliant on other Systems and consequently to other contrys (USA/Russia).
EU was building up Galileo, and after a long time they got the GNSS Status. What means, just with Galileo, anywhere on the world at any time, are at least 4 Sat visible. Resulting in the ability to calculate a position. China with BaiDou did the same.
So because of the condition to work on the whole world (to be a GNSS) there is no "best fit" or something like that on a specifik region. There are supporting regional systems, but they are a whole other topic, that most of the time is not relevant in this hobby RC scenario.
The signal of all Sattelites are there, all the time, and can be recaived from anyone. They are just flying beacons. So anyone can build a GNSS Antenna and a recaiver, that will translate the signals. So in a bit of an effort (A lot of effort) it was possible to prozess the GPS and GLONASS signals in the same algorythm to calculate a position.
Yeah! you now have doubled the potential Satellites to use.
When Galileo and BeiDou where online the same happend. Collect all 4 GNSS Signals, prozess them all together and calculate a position. With 4 times the Sat count.
So every GNSS can work on his own. Sure with much less Sat, but it will work.
But as long as the GNSS are running, use alls GNSS in your settings. You will get more Sat resulting in a faster and more stable "Fix"
Best Regards
Dave
Darren - A simple question you may ask but how do you save my INAV 7.0 FW & Configurator that I've installed on my Quad & computer without re-flashing this is after closing every thing out - if you know what I mean - if I keep the work Minimised everything comes back up again
Sorry Joe, I don’t follow you. You install Configurator on your computer. Then flash the firmware on to the flight controller. When you connect the flight controller to the computer and update it via Configurator. The settings are saved on the flight controller. After disconnecting, you can shut down Configurator. It doesn’t remember anything on the flight controller.
@@MrD- So I've loaded the FW onto the FC using the Configurator - played about with the Quads settings etc - then disconnected the Configurator, unplugged the FC but now I want to make more adjustments to the FC settings - this I cannot do cos am unable for the FC to communicate with the Configurator again - The configurator only presents me with COM1 for comm's even though there are a bunch of COM Ports ''not in use'' how do I select and possibly use one of these spare Ports ...joe
how do you set the alignment tool in Inav 7.0.1? My direction home arrow is off in the OSD. Just checking to see if it is set right.
The board alignment is set based on the flight controller in the aircraft. The home arrow is calculated from the GPS. Which video system are you using?
@@MrD Analog
@@mysticguido1 have you set up a pan servo or pan servo offset?
Is this using a compass?
@@MrD I have a new Atomrc Swordfish, first time using Inav. The plane is stock it is the RTH version. I added the camera and VTX which came from a stock Rekon 6. In betaflight it worked and now not like it did.
Please tell me where the switch was removed, use medium throttle to hold the advanced settings tab
Sorry, I don’t really know what you mean. I don’t remember a medium throttle setting. Only cruise, min and max navigation throttles and the launch throttles on Advanced Tuning. They’re all still there.
@@MrD Multirotor Navigation Settings, slider - Use mid. throttle for ALTHOLD
Sorry, I’ve not used multirotor settings.
Thanks for all the new goodies we can test now 😊. Just to confirm: is it safe to move my settings from INAV 6.1.1 to 7RC1 using DIFF ALL?
Yes
Remember the part in the video about reading all the release notes 😉
@@MrD Hahaha, you didn't put your "read the release notes" T-shirt on 😊
Does inav support FRSKY ACCESS 24ch sbus?
No, not yet.
This WS-M181 unit does not work stable on my F765! Mostly only 5Hz and it wiggles between 4.5 or 5 to 12.5. Uart speed 115200 or 230400, it does not make any difference.
Strange as I have the WS-M181 attached to a Matek F765-WSE in my Baby AR Wing Pro. It does run at 5Hz, that’s a known in 6.x (can be faster in 7.0). But it works very well and I get satellites quickly. Even indoors. The port’s baud rate is at 115200 too. Maybe you have something near the GPS that is causing interference?
A GPS is just a peripheral. So how well it works is not related to the MCU of the flight controller it’s connected to.
@@MrD Same here, I have them in 2 builts (one running 7.0RC1) and both are working fine.
@@MrD ..well. seems to be ok, mmosca answered on this , " that update rate is calculated based on how often the navigation messages are delivered"
Got it working at 10Hz.......but only if it is set to UBLOX7 !!
доброго времени ! помогите решить проблему . полетный контроллер speedybee f405 wing не входит в DFU РЕЖИМ а конфигуратор пишет (Failed to open MSP connection) ..... zadig и прочие утилиты не помогли решить проблему....может быть есть какая то возможность через CLI исправить ситуацию? команда какая нибудь ....например сброс настроек или до заводских настроек.? помогите, жалко из коробки ведь не работал....может там какая то защита стоит
спасибо!!!
Попробуйте отпаять все провода от всех юартов и перевести в дифю режим
@@user-jn6hp9ig6m started with the battery connected.....thank you!!!!now problems with gps BN880 does not connect is lit red.and when the compass is connected, the barometer is cut off, I don't know what to do