Sorry if it got a little convoluted around the composite function part. The simpler but less rigorous reason we can put the limit in the natural logarithm is because n can only be found within the natural log. Please give me your feedback on this one.😀
Great video sir 👍 I didn't get the inference of it being continuous and it's limits existing😅 like what does that means? Then I watched another video on it and it all clicked thanks a lot always found it strange that e^x is the same in differentiation 😮
nice vid tho i'm not sure this approach is correct: exponential is defined as a function f(x) such as f'(x)+c = f(x) what can be done tho is proving that e=lim n->0(1+n)^1/n or simply approximating the value of e, you can do that easily with tailor series i guess.
Sorry if it got a little convoluted around the composite function part. The simpler but less rigorous reason we can put the limit in the natural logarithm is because n can only be found within the natural log. Please give me your feedback on this one.😀
NICE! love the longer video bro!
just discovered your stuff very nice content.
Great video sir 👍 I didn't get the inference of it being continuous and it's limits existing😅 like what does that means? Then I watched another video on it and it all clicked thanks a lot always found it strange that e^x is the same in differentiation 😮
Nice video👍
nice vid tho i'm not sure this approach is correct: exponential is defined as a function f(x) such as f'(x)+c = f(x) what can be done tho is proving that e=lim n->0(1+n)^1/n or simply approximating the value of e, you can do that easily with tailor series i guess.
exp is ln^-1 so exp'(x)=1/ln'(exp(x))=exp(x)
thanks for the vid bud i requested it
You like math AND you're cute! Keep it up!
thomas u r gay
;)
nice hat. go hawks!
Go Hawks!