Funny how var can’t see a blatant handball in a fa cup semi final but deems a slight push on the back enough for a review. Consistency in the country from officials is a disgrace
City - no handball against Grealish in the FA Cup semi final. Same stadium, same competition, same type of handball the very next day against United - handball awarded and penalty to Coventry. City vs Brighton City get a free kick for a player slipping over, which they then score from via deflected goal - apparently VAR can't intervene because it's not a "Clear and obvious error"??? On what planet is a player being given a free kick for slipping over NOT a clear and obvious error? Brighton get no penalty for a blatant foul in the City box - clear as day. Chelsea's first goal - offside by a margin, checked by "VAR".. The winning goal - a "foul" - also checked by VAR. The first check took some considerable time... yet in the FA Cup semi final the "handball" wasn't even properly checked and was "cleared" within 30 seconds, as was the Kyle Walker shoulder barge on Jackson I think it was, Walker was the last man and it was in the box as well. A slight push in the box is a foul... but a full shoulder barge to knock the player running through ON GOAL in the box ISN't a foul? City fans can f*ck right off with their "different gravy" crap - it certainly helps when not only do you have a team of good players but you get every decision handed to you. Coupled with the fact that City seem to get goals via deflection (Chelsea FA Cup semi, the "Free kickk" which was a player slipping over, was also a deflected goal), yet Chelsea mainly get deflected goals against them.... when you get almost no luck coupled with being cheated out of correct decisions, it's no wonder you can't win. I thought the foul on the player for the winning goal was a foul, but then equally i've seen worse "fouls" not given in the box...
@@Gtank941 It's a push. But to be fair when you look at how often shoulder barges in the box go unpunished.. Look at the Kyle Walker should barge on Jackson in the FA Cup semi final. Runs towards the player, more than the ball, barges into him leading with his shoulder... walker was the last man and it's in the box. No foul. But they give a foul when it's a push that leads to a goal, and yet won't give a foul for a push that might lead to a penalty. In the same way that they don't give a penalty for a blatant handball in the box, but the very next day, at the same stadium, in the same competition and at the same end of the pitch, they give a handball for an almost identical situation...
If a two handed push by Joelinton against Gabriel was not a foul according to pgmol and many opposition supporting pundits there is no way this is a foul.
Had the goal stood then the Villa manager and plenty of others would also complain that var wasn't doing its job. Impossible to please everyone with this one
Joelinton went up for a header and won the ball inches from the goal line, he had a hand on the back but there was very little force. Two very different scenarios that Arsenal fans still cry about.
@@NUFCOfficial very little force? Joelinton was pushing down on Gabriel while they were both going up for the header. That has more force than a push where the arms barely extend with little to no weight behind it.
A shoulder in the back as a player is about to head the ball is a foul. All goals are reviewed by VAR who correctly pointed out the foul so the ref can have a look. You can celebrate all yiz like but it's a foul. UTV
@@andyvilla4489 how do you explain a kick on Mac Allister by Doku, that was a clear foul but not a pen. Half of them teams are getting robbed through the entire season
@@thebeemothat’s not villas fault that the officials got it wrong there but when a player is about to head the ball and gets a nudge in the back it is a foul
Never heard anyone call me the PL the “toughest” league in the world. You mean competitive, which isn’t close to what you said. So you’re either stupid or, well, stupid.
A terrible performance from Villa,we were lucky to get a draw at the end,more injuries again, we're cursed this season,but still sit 4th & can't complain overall. UCL here we come...... up the mighty Villa!!! 😊
Starting to realise that the problem that arises with mark leading the brigade against VAR is that when there’s a valid VAR decision then it’s still being used as reasoning against VAR and discredits the whole movement mark is trying to embark on. As a Chelsea fan that goal was rightfully ruled out.
As a Chelsea fan I agree with you. It's just the inconsistencies going in certain team's favours is what does me.. City vs Chelsea in the semi.... no handball awarded for a blatant handball, checked and "cleared" within 30 seconds and no on field review even took place. Kyle walker shoulder barges Jackson I believe it was, to the ground in the City box. Walker was the last man and there was no other defender anywhere near - it was a goalscoring opportunity but they don't deem that a foul, despite that being more of a "foul" than the push in this game was. City vs Brighton - City get a freekick for a player slipping over. The ball deflects in from it and gives them a 2 goal lead when it should never have been a foul in the first place - VAR doesn't review it and intervene despite the fact it's a CLEAR and OBVIOUS error... Brighton don't get a penalty and VAR doesn't even look at it properly when it's a clear penalty. That's the kind of crap that we're fed up of... it's not that the likes of City aren't a good side - because they are, but it's the way in which almost every decision seems to go in their favour, regularly.
But why wasnt arsenals third goal against us ruled out, Gabriels foul on Madueke leading to their goal was way worse than tis one. I dont really complain about either decision, but the problem is that they reached different conclusions. Inconsistensy is the problem
@@robfortune6 for me personaly that wasnt a foul, but the problem is that it was different decisions made. For example Joelintons push on Gabriel earlier in the season was way worse than both of these decisions- but that still stood as no «clear and obvios» error. Considering that conclusion, its crazy that Badiashiles very soft push is clear and obvious mistake.
@@kongkiiingI think the Gabriel incident is irrelevant because Newcastle should've gotten a red card in the first half and the game would've been entirely different from there, I didn't think the push was that bad though, whereas Gabriel actually grabbed Madueke and pulled him to the ground, so that one is entirely different to a push and it is a foul tbh, the main reason I didn't care too much was because we were already 2-0 up and we would've won anyway, but it still shouldn't have counted. In terms of the Villa vs Chelsea incident, I already forgot it tbh, I'll watch it again in a while and see lmao
@@Vintage88611 because the Chelsea attacker didn't even try to get the ball but pushed the defender from the back in which we all know if he hadn't that would have never been a goal
Jackson is better than Rasmus you always complaining he doesn’t get any chances but truth is he isn’t playing with confidence he always pass as soon as he receives it
Poch From the beginning I see what he is trying to do every game ....but my manager tenhag he plays long balls he plays deep some games he tries to play out from the back.... just stick to your plan mate if any of these players can't do what u want then ur at the wrong club
Var need to start taking players reactions into account. Carlos didn’t appeal at all and neither did any other player. He’s got to be stronger there he knew it.
You can only go shoulder to shoulder. Not shoulder into someone's back who's about to head the ball. It's a foul. VAR review all goals and pointed out the foul for the ref to take a look who correctly disallowed the goal. You can celebrate all you like but it's still a foul.
Swear I haven’t seen anyone mention on that final goal the Aston Villa defender is constantly checking behind him and backs into badiashile he could’ve cleared the ball before the foul even happened the defender fucked it
Football is dirty and full of contradictions. I've seen players being held in the penalty area and the referee ignores this, but an obvious dive being given a penalty. Thats why I prefer tennis. Less BS
Wolves vs Man cityin 2019, where Wolves cameback to win 3-2, Look at the Jimenez goal, Adama Traore did exactly what badiashile did to carlos to Mendy and the goal stood. Very very soft.
Never a foul, yes he's challenging for the ball but it's only punished because the defender isn't challenging for the ball. What's the defender doing? Waiting for the ball to bounce in his box, come on this is ballbag
Funny how var can’t see a blatant handball in a fa cup semi final but deems a slight push on the back enough for a review. Consistency in the country from officials is a disgrace
Var is just an excuse to rig games and sometimes the make correct decisions to appear good
They gave it to Coventry the next day but didn't give it to United today.Jokers
City - no handball against Grealish in the FA Cup semi final.
Same stadium, same competition, same type of handball the very next day against United - handball awarded and penalty to Coventry.
City vs Brighton
City get a free kick for a player slipping over, which they then score from via deflected goal - apparently VAR can't intervene because it's not a "Clear and obvious error"??? On what planet is a player being given a free kick for slipping over NOT a clear and obvious error?
Brighton get no penalty for a blatant foul in the City box - clear as day.
Chelsea's first goal - offside by a margin, checked by "VAR"..
The winning goal - a "foul" - also checked by VAR.
The first check took some considerable time... yet in the FA Cup semi final the "handball" wasn't even properly checked and was "cleared" within 30 seconds, as was the Kyle Walker shoulder barge on Jackson I think it was, Walker was the last man and it was in the box as well.
A slight push in the box is a foul... but a full shoulder barge to knock the player running through ON GOAL in the box ISN't a foul?
City fans can f*ck right off with their "different gravy" crap - it certainly helps when not only do you have a team of good players but you get every decision handed to you.
Coupled with the fact that City seem to get goals via deflection (Chelsea FA Cup semi, the "Free kickk" which was a player slipping over, was also a deflected goal), yet Chelsea mainly get deflected goals against them.... when you get almost no luck coupled with being cheated out of correct decisions, it's no wonder you can't win.
I thought the foul on the player for the winning goal was a foul, but then equally i've seen worse "fouls" not given in the box...
Slight? Behave
@@Gtank941 It's a push.
But to be fair when you look at how often shoulder barges in the box go unpunished..
Look at the Kyle Walker should barge on Jackson in the FA Cup semi final.
Runs towards the player, more than the ball, barges into him leading with his shoulder... walker was the last man and it's in the box. No foul.
But they give a foul when it's a push that leads to a goal, and yet won't give a foul for a push that might lead to a penalty.
In the same way that they don't give a penalty for a blatant handball in the box, but the very next day, at the same stadium, in the same competition and at the same end of the pitch, they give a handball for an almost identical situation...
If a two handed push by Joelinton against Gabriel was not a foul according to pgmol and many opposition supporting pundits there is no way this is a foul.
Precisely. That being said they should both he considered fouls by the book
Yeah but this was a foul😂you can’t just push a player in the back mate…. It’s a foul. Chelsea are shit, get over it
Had the goal stood then the Villa manager and plenty of others would also complain that var wasn't doing its job.
Impossible to please everyone with this one
Joelinton went up for a header and won the ball inches from the goal line, he had a hand on the back but there was very little force. Two very different scenarios that Arsenal fans still cry about.
@@NUFCOfficial very little force? Joelinton was pushing down on Gabriel while they were both going up for the header. That has more force than a push where the arms barely extend with little to no weight behind it.
cucerella og 1-0: 0:06
jackson disallowed goal: 1:45
rogers 2-0: 4:59
madueke 2-1: 6:22
gallagher 2-2: 7:03
disasi dissalowed goal: 8:04
Legend
The first thing I look for every video! Well in mate
It is insane how they don`t even try to hide it. If that was city, the third goal would have never been denied.
Honestly I'm getting to the point of giving up watching the English football. Don't even enjoy it now because its constant BS
It doesn't favour the premier league if city win it so that argument is beyond silly
A shoulder in the back as a player is about to head the ball is a foul. All goals are reviewed by VAR who correctly pointed out the foul so the ref can have a look. You can celebrate all yiz like but it's a foul. UTV
@@andyvilla4489 how do you explain a kick on Mac Allister by Doku, that was a clear foul but not a pen. Half of them teams are getting robbed through the entire season
@@thebeemothat’s not villas fault that the officials got it wrong there but when a player is about to head the ball and gets a nudge in the back it is a foul
VAR is taking away all the excitement of goals in big games GET FUCKING RID OF IT
Until the next time you get an obvious wrong call go against your team
Never a foul. The games gone soft. Fuck var and their inconsistencies
Well they gave us 2 against United which weren't honestly pens so maybe it's karma.We should have used our chances
Then why did the Gabriel foul not get given which cost us at least 2 points in the Newcastle game? They're trying their hardest to script the league
It's 100% a foul. You can't push a player in the back the Villa player was under the ball just waiting for it to come down.
Theyve been saying games gone soft for maybe 20 years now, its not news that you cant assault players and get away with it anymore
NEVER a foul
chelsea were great and deserved to win
its so funny to see goldbridge being biased
And they call it the "tOuGhEsT leAgUe iN tHe wOrLd" with most physicalities..Prem is the softest league with physicalities propaganda branding
You haven’t watched LaLiga
Erm… they mean the fittest players not actually strongest. Take a look, English teams do more running than most.
Never heard anyone call me the PL the “toughest” league in the world. You mean competitive, which isn’t close to what you said. So you’re either stupid or, well, stupid.
Chelsea ROBBED big time
Biggest Robbery this season !!!
No where near
Not even close chelsea fans need to relax it wasn't even a robbery in the first place
Are you blind ??
Absolute daylight robbery
Chelsea once robbed united with 2 soft contact penalty. So chill
Are you sure man city isn't the owner of prem😂
Bizarre comment - what has any of this got to do with Man City?
can`t wait till next season!
A terrible performance from Villa,we were lucky to get a draw at the end,more injuries again, we're cursed this season,but still sit 4th & can't complain overall. UCL here we come...... up the mighty Villa!!! 😊
Thanks to the ref
Starting to realise that the problem that arises with mark leading the brigade against VAR is that when there’s a valid VAR decision then it’s still being used as reasoning against VAR and discredits the whole movement mark is trying to embark on. As a Chelsea fan that goal was rightfully ruled out.
As a Chelsea fan I agree with you.
It's just the inconsistencies going in certain team's favours is what does me..
City vs Chelsea in the semi.... no handball awarded for a blatant handball, checked and "cleared" within 30 seconds and no on field review even took place.
Kyle walker shoulder barges Jackson I believe it was, to the ground in the City box. Walker was the last man and there was no other defender anywhere near - it was a goalscoring opportunity but they don't deem that a foul, despite that being more of a "foul" than the push in this game was.
City vs Brighton - City get a freekick for a player slipping over. The ball deflects in from it and gives them a 2 goal lead when it should never have been a foul in the first place - VAR doesn't review it and intervene despite the fact it's a CLEAR and OBVIOUS error...
Brighton don't get a penalty and VAR doesn't even look at it properly when it's a clear penalty.
That's the kind of crap that we're fed up of... it's not that the likes of City aren't a good side - because they are, but it's the way in which almost every decision seems to go in their favour, regularly.
But why wasnt arsenals third goal against us ruled out, Gabriels foul on Madueke leading to their goal was way worse than tis one. I dont really complain about either decision, but the problem is that they reached different conclusions. Inconsistensy is the problem
@@kongkiiingI'm still undecided on whether or not that was a foul but it probably was, luckily it didn't really matter in the end regardless
@@robfortune6 for me personaly that wasnt a foul, but the problem is that it was different decisions made. For example Joelintons push on Gabriel earlier in the season was way worse than both of these decisions- but that still stood as no «clear and obvios» error. Considering that conclusion, its crazy that Badiashiles very soft push is clear and obvious mistake.
@@kongkiiingI think the Gabriel incident is irrelevant because Newcastle should've gotten a red card in the first half and the game would've been entirely different from there, I didn't think the push was that bad though, whereas Gabriel actually grabbed Madueke and pulled him to the ground, so that one is entirely different to a push and it is a foul tbh, the main reason I didn't care too much was because we were already 2-0 up and we would've won anyway, but it still shouldn't have counted. In terms of the Villa vs Chelsea incident, I already forgot it tbh, I'll watch it again in a while and see lmao
goldbridge rallying people to complain about var but won't talk about this, biased coward
Var ruined football honestly.... Screw this and the refs in england
Its absolutely incredible that he thought the Chelsea goal was onside, he does wear glasses tbf
Chelsea robbed
Chelsea been chelshit the whole season don't make excuses now
Actually no,that was a clear foul
@@theloner717 Didn't even call for it mate so explain how that's a foul?
Probably because he knew it’d be overturned. Using the logic that the player didn’t complain is moronic
@@Vintage88611 because the Chelsea attacker didn't even try to get the ball but pushed the defender from the back in which we all know if he hadn't that would have never been a goal
12 seconds is crazy
Jackson is better than Rasmus you always complaining he doesn’t get any chances but truth is he isn’t playing with confidence he always pass as soon as he receives it
call 999 for that absolute daylight robbery
If that was a foul then Doku challenge was a nudge right
We should see VAR from a bird eyes view…that would be interesting!
Poch From the beginning I see what he is trying to do every game ....but my manager tenhag he plays long balls he plays deep some games he tries to play out from the back.... just stick to your plan mate if any of these players can't do what u want then ur at the wrong club
Var need to start taking players reactions into account. Carlos didn’t appeal at all and neither did any other player. He’s got to be stronger there he knew it.
Var disgrace
Correct decision, well done VAR
Its clearly on 😂😂😂
Chelsea played better but that was a foul.
robbed
Why is that a foul its a very soft push thats absolutely normal
cause you can't push in the back soft or hard while making no attempt for the ball simple
You can only go shoulder to shoulder. Not shoulder into someone's back who's about to head the ball. It's a foul. VAR review all goals and pointed out the foul for the ref to take a look who correctly disallowed the goal. You can celebrate all you like but it's still a foul.
It’s one of them where if it happens in the Chelsea box, their fans are calling foul.
We’re football fans. We’re allowed to be fickle.
Swear I haven’t seen anyone mention on that final goal the Aston Villa defender is constantly checking behind him and backs into badiashile he could’ve cleared the ball before the foul even happened the defender fucked it
How many times are Chelsea going to get robbed this season.. VAR is ruining the game.
I can’t actually believe people are saying no foul 😂
Even Diego Carlos wasnt complaining till he saw someone in Villa complains...
How can that be a foul if that was a defender doing that to a attacker that would never be given as a pen
Football is dirty and full of contradictions. I've seen players being held in the penalty area and the referee ignores this, but an obvious dive being given a penalty. Thats why I prefer tennis. Less BS
Wolves vs Man cityin 2019, where Wolves cameback to win 3-2, Look at the Jimenez goal, Adama Traore did exactly what badiashile did to carlos to Mendy and the goal stood. Very very soft.
Newcastle vs Arsenal,it stood when Joelinton hopped on Gabriel's back
Rigged. If it was taking so much time to declare offside, then probably it is not
It just means it very close,
Why are you still watching premier league games when you've said its boring and corrupt?
OK wallace
Chelsea, how those two penalties vs United were penalties???
Looking for another dubious penalty vs a tired City who scored open goal vs u.
Never a foul, yes he's challenging for the ball but it's only punished because the defender isn't challenging for the ball. What's the defender doing? Waiting for the ball to bounce in his box, come on this is ballbag
That bit in saving private Ryan is awfull
That celebration is originally Morgan Rogers,but Cole Palmer copied it,fact.!!
Chelsea weren't robbed,, they weren't good enough. Simple.
Chealse we're great but so was Villa.
CHELSEA FFP CHEATS 😂
115 charges, have fun in league 1 ur club should be used to it
No way a city fan is talking about FFP 💀
115
🎣🎣🎣
Erm. What 💀 Man City fan saying this 💀
Don't stop the Chelsea hate don't worry we will soon see who's laughing