The Catholic Church’s UNTOLD Roles in Slavery (A Forbidden Tale)
Vložit
- čas přidán 28. 08. 2023
- The Church, as an institution, has long presented itself as a sanctuary, a beacon of hope, spirituality, and moral guidance. Its grandiose architecture and soothing hymns can inspire a sense of tranquillity and comfort, drawing believers seeking solace from the trials of the world. Yet, beyond the facade of serenity, lies an ominous tale that reveals a complex and often troubling reality.
In the annals of history, the painful legacy of slavery casts an indelible shadow over humanity's past. Regrettably, the Christian Church, particularly the Catholic Church, which holds a long and influential history, was not exempt from involvement in this dark chapter of human existence. The tragic tale of slavery and its ties to religion reveals a profound contradiction between the Church's teachings of love and compassion and its historical support of human bondage.
🤝 We need your support! Please consider buying us a coffee to help sustain and grow our content. Your contribution directly fuels our work, and motivates us to deliver high-quality content 🙏
🤗 buymeacoffee.com/blackjournals
👉 Visit Our Merch Store: black-journals.myspreadshop.com/
Join me on a transformative journey as we honour our black ancestors and reclaim our world through the lens of Africa. Through engaging dialogue, we will explore the rich tapestry of African history, culture, and worldview, discovering their profound relevance in our lives today. Together, we will share our thoughts and knowledge, fostering a new culture of awareness and reclaiming our collective narrative.
Let's celebrate the vibrant heritage and enduring legacy of Africa, forging a path of enlightenment and unity. Together, we can shape a future rooted in understanding, respect, and shared heritage.
Follow Us On Twitter And Facebook 🤗
👉 / blackjournals01
👉 / theblackjournal
👉 Visit our website: theblackjournals.com/
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sources:
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Christi...
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dum_Div...
www.nytimes.com/2003/11/01/ar...
npr.org/2003/12/15/1548811/the-curse-of-ham-slavery-and-the-old-testament
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/George_...
www.scielo.org.za/scielo.php?s...
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Richard...
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Ca...)
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Selina_...
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
#Africanhistory #BlackHistory #BlackCulture
![Eminem - Houdini [Official Music Video]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/22tVWwmTie8/mqdefault.jpg)
🤝 We need your support! Please consider buying us a coffee to help sustain and grow our content. Your contribution directly fuels our work, and motivates us to deliver high-quality content 🙏
🤗 buymeacoffee.com/blackjournals
👉 Visit Our Merch Store: black-journals.myspreadshop.com/
Please do a video on professor Tony Martin's work!
You would be my hero...
Before the fake bots come: the vatican is behind everything maybe blackjournals hasn't figured it out but they're behind the civil war , taking Moses tablets from the americas to the west.
We never came from Africa We are the true and only native americans look up the gullah gullah wars for context😂
Wait brother hold on now , this what I'm watching this this is complete bullshit bro they took us from America over to west Africa we are shemites or from the seed of yahshem aka shem from the sons of noah😂
Why are you hiding WHO the Catholic Church made war on. Why no cites from primary sources like the Spanish Inquisition and Portuguese Expulsion? You sir, are either a bullshitter, ignorant, or worse. Prove me wrong.
Well researched.
I grew up in the Catholic Church. I will never step foot in another Catholic Church...
It's anti Catholic propaganda .
@@Downey-2000 ...facts are facts...even if it hurts.
FUCK ROMAN CATHOLICISM.
@@Downey-2000 Tell me you know nothing about history without telling me you know nothing about history.
@@Downey-2000 From The Last Sermon Of Prophet Muhammad (p.b.u.h.)
"All mankind is from Adam and Eve, an Arab has no superiority over a non-Arab nor a non-Arab has any superiority over an Arab; also a White has no superiority over a Black nor a Black has any superiority over a White except by piety and good action. Learn that every Muslim is a brother to every Muslim and that the Muslims constitute one brotherhood. Nothing shall be legitimate to a Muslim which belongs to a fellow Muslim unless it was given freely and willingly."
Don't you ever forget what they Did!!!
How can we with confederate flags and statues everywhere down south. They glorify/idolize their sins.
Christianity
The first victim of their hate is themselves. Pity the racists because they are killing themselves at over 60 seconds a minute Tick Tock.
@@willmallory9085; Upstate NY, too; makes one feel like you are driving thru the heart of Dixie; get off the HWY & check out "their" roads, confederate flags hanging from windows, porches & yard poles.
@@barbaraaharris9616 WOW, I didn't know.
Keep these videos coming brother. Our history will not be diminished and tainted by people who only seek to control the story for their own benefit. I appreciate you posting these videos. Keep up the good fight.
Blacks need to first forgive the Africans who enslaved them. Dr Livingston worked to stop Africans from enslaving other Africans.
Hey, us white folks are interested too. Though your problems are a bit closer for me. I’m old enough to remember when anti-Italian prejudice was common in Canada. Never as bad as what you folks put up with, but no fun.
Our history has already been tainted, if you take a look at the judges faces hat were erased to suite them, and was diminished back in the Greek and Roman days. But it's only a temporary setback.
I've been on this earth for quite some time and no god or gods (if exist) has ever CONTACTED ME DIRECTLY and told ME they INSPIRED HUMANS to write books called BIBLE, QURAN, or TORAH that I should subscribe to and follow.
No god or gods (if exist) has ever CONTACTED ME DIRECTLY and told ME
I should join a religion, pray, go to buildings call churches, give my money to buildings call churches, worship them, repent, get saved, I'm a sinner, follow them and a man name Jesus, sing gospel music, or listen to humans call pastors, popes, preacher etc.
You read that right. No God or Gods has ever told me any of this.
So, if GOD or GODS did not CONTACT ME DIRECTLY telling me all these things, WHO DID?
OTHER HUMANS... and that's why at a very young age I stopped subscribing to and believing what is, in my opinion, nothing more than a bunch of HUMAN INVENTED FOOLISHNESS and CRAZINESS. 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
what are you going to go to untainted your history?
Keep on telling the truth about our Black History and the Church.
Don’t spare Islam either. Christianity on one side, Islam on the other
And Judaism to this day
I agree.
The Truth 1000 years of Islam slave trade get them to
🎯
Facts! Read Dr. Walter Williams books, "The Historical Origins of Christianity, and also the Historical Origins of Islam, excellent reads, and of course, anything by Dr.Ben.
Thank you for this. Just truly horrible and devastating.
Agreed & they check for every excuse tew Defender that emottagen violent belief 19:24
Popes have talked against slavery at the time. There were Catholics that did slavery but the church never officially said to do it. The popes at the time spoke against it. But from 1435 to 1890, a succession of popes condemned the slave trade and slavery in no uncertain terms. The first pope to do so was Eugenius IV (r. 1431-1447), who in his 1435 bull Sicut Dudum demanded that Christians free all enslaved natives of the Canary Islands within fifteen days; failure to do so would incur automatic excommunication. Thus, fifty-seven years before Columbus’s first voyage, the Roman pontiff unequivocally prohibited the enslavement of native peoples.
In 1537, Pope Paul III (r. 1534-1549) issued a bull, Sublimus Dei, which taught that natives peoples were not to be enslaved. In 1591, Gregory XIV (r. 1590-1591) promulgated Cum Sicuti, which was addressed to the bishop of Manila in the Philippines and reiterated his predecessors’ prohibitions against enslaving native peoples. In the seventeenth century, Urban VIII (r. 1623-1644) promulgated Commissum Nobis (1639) in support of the Spanish king’s (Philip IV) edict prohibiting enslavement of the Indians in the New World.
The need for cheap and abundant labor in the colonies is what led to the African slave trade. This new form of bondage was also condemned by the popes, beginning with Innocent XI (r. 1676-1689). In 1741, Benedict XIV (r. 1740-1758) issued Immensa Pastorum, which reiterated that the penalty for enslaving Indians was excommunication. In 1839, Gregory XVI (r. 1831-1846) issued In Supremo to condemn the enslavement of Africans. Pope Leo XIII (r. 1878-1903) promulgated two bulls condemning slavery in 1888 and 1890.
@@ev3goddess Popes have talked against slavery at the time. There were Catholics that did slavery but the church never officially said to do it. The popes at the time spoke against it. But from 1435 to 1890, a succession of popes condemned the slave trade and slavery in no uncertain terms. The first pope to do so was Eugenius IV (r. 1431-1447), who in his 1435 bull Sicut Dudum demanded that Christians free all enslaved natives of the Canary Islands within fifteen days; failure to do so would incur automatic excommunication. Thus, fifty-seven years before Columbus’s first voyage, the Roman pontiff unequivocally prohibited the enslavement of native peoples.
In 1537, Pope Paul III (r. 1534-1549) issued a bull, Sublimus Dei, which taught that natives peoples were not to be enslaved. In 1591, Gregory XIV (r. 1590-1591) promulgated Cum Sicuti, which was addressed to the bishop of Manila in the Philippines and reiterated his predecessors’ prohibitions against enslaving native peoples. In the seventeenth century, Urban VIII (r. 1623-1644) promulgated Commissum Nobis (1639) in support of the Spanish king’s (Philip IV) edict prohibiting enslavement of the Indians in the New World.
The need for cheap and abundant labor in the colonies is what led to the African slave trade. This new form of bondage was also condemned by the popes, beginning with Innocent XI (r. 1676-1689). In 1741, Benedict XIV (r. 1740-1758) issued Immensa Pastorum, which reiterated that the penalty for enslaving Indians was excommunication. In 1839, Gregory XVI (r. 1831-1846) issued In Supremo to condemn the enslavement of Africans. Pope Leo XIII (r. 1878-1903) promulgated two bulls condemning slavery in 1888 and 1890.
Thank you very much .
A must . One documentary that every Christian and specially Catholic should see .
The Arabs would castrate the black slaves and not the white slaves. Mohammed said only white skin goes to Heaven, watch Christian Prince.
Man heart is desperate wicked wolf in sheep clothing strong delusions judgements double said the lord at hand 🇪🇹 🖤. Emanuel I am.
Also understand the Daniel chapter 7 forewarning about the fourth beast or kingdom upon earth. Which was & historically is the Roman Empire and where the Roman Catholic Church + European unbiblically supported mainstream version of Christianity byway of the Protestant movement all came from or trace back to
To be fair, you must remember that it was President Abraham Lincoln and thousands of white Americans ( most of them Christians) who died fighting to abolish slavery in the USA.
Popes have talked against slavery at the time. There were Catholics that did slavery but the church never officially said to do it. The popes at the time spoke against it. But from 1435 to 1890, a succession of popes condemned the slave trade and slavery in no uncertain terms. The first pope to do so was Eugenius IV (r. 1431-1447), who in his 1435 bull Sicut Dudum demanded that Christians free all enslaved natives of the Canary Islands within fifteen days; failure to do so would incur automatic excommunication. Thus, fifty-seven years before Columbus’s first voyage, the Roman pontiff unequivocally prohibited the enslavement of native peoples.
In 1537, Pope Paul III (r. 1534-1549) issued a bull, Sublimus Dei, which taught that natives peoples were not to be enslaved. In 1591, Gregory XIV (r. 1590-1591) promulgated Cum Sicuti, which was addressed to the bishop of Manila in the Philippines and reiterated his predecessors’ prohibitions against enslaving native peoples. In the seventeenth century, Urban VIII (r. 1623-1644) promulgated Commissum Nobis (1639) in support of the Spanish king’s (Philip IV) edict prohibiting enslavement of the Indians in the New World.
The need for cheap and abundant labor in the colonies is what led to the African slave trade. This new form of bondage was also condemned by the popes, beginning with Innocent XI (r. 1676-1689). In 1741, Benedict XIV (r. 1740-1758) issued Immensa Pastorum, which reiterated that the penalty for enslaving Indians was excommunication. In 1839, Gregory XVI (r. 1831-1846) issued In Supremo to condemn the enslavement of Africans. Pope Leo XIII (r. 1878-1903) promulgated two bulls condemning slavery in 1888 and 1890.
Since Christophe Colomb we all know the story, I just don't understand why people still go to the Catholics church and why Catholics still exist
continuing to promote the gay agenda
Same with islam. Islam introduced the enslavement of Afrikans to the europeans, i.e., portuguese, whom they hired as mercenaries to capturw and kidnap Afrikans!!
Especially, since they also allowed children to me molested for decades by priest and did nothing about it.
That is a good question .
ALL ROADS LEAD TO ROME. They now control the entire planet, and the planet is doomed.
I love history stories and how religion relates to slavery, and the part the churches played in slavery, keep these videos coming, thank you for sharing
Popes have talked against slavery at the time. There were Catholics that did slavery but the church never officially said to do it. The popes at the time spoke against it. But from 1435 to 1890, a succession of popes condemned the slave trade and slavery in no uncertain terms. The first pope to do so was Eugenius IV (r. 1431-1447), who in his 1435 bull Sicut Dudum demanded that Christians free all enslaved natives of the Canary Islands within fifteen days; failure to do so would incur automatic excommunication. Thus, fifty-seven years before Columbus’s first voyage, the Roman pontiff unequivocally prohibited the enslavement of native peoples.
In 1537, Pope Paul III (r. 1534-1549) issued a bull, Sublimus Dei, which taught that natives peoples were not to be enslaved. In 1591, Gregory XIV (r. 1590-1591) promulgated Cum Sicuti, which was addressed to the bishop of Manila in the Philippines and reiterated his predecessors’ prohibitions against enslaving native peoples. In the seventeenth century, Urban VIII (r. 1623-1644) promulgated Commissum Nobis (1639) in support of the Spanish king’s (Philip IV) edict prohibiting enslavement of the Indians in the New World.
The need for cheap and abundant labor in the colonies is what led to the African slave trade. This new form of bondage was also condemned by the popes, beginning with Innocent XI (r. 1676-1689). In 1741, Benedict XIV (r. 1740-1758) issued Immensa Pastorum, which reiterated that the penalty for enslaving Indians was excommunication. In 1839, Gregory XVI (r. 1831-1846) issued In Supremo to condemn the enslavement of Africans. Pope Leo XIII (r. 1878-1903) promulgated two bulls condemning slavery in 1888 and 1890.
The Catholic church owes the children of those slaves reparations.
They don't owe us anything. We have to take account for our forefathers sins and also ours today. The prophet Jeremiah was given word by the most High on that issue for disobedience to Him, Just as the heathen nations today will pay for that which was done to our fathers by their ancestors and those of whom are here today , as spoken by the prophet Isaiah. We of the Diaspora have to finish our time here, For no man can buy us out of slavery as written by Moses
Good luck with that one 😂
@@meanpopsimogreensimmons5959 No offense, but fuck all that bullshit you talking about.🤔😂🤣😂
Africa owes descendants of slaves reparations too.
They were Jewish companies doing this .
Truth be told . All that’s been hidden will come to light .
Popes have talked against slavery at the time. There were Catholics that did slavery but the church never officially said to do it. The popes at the time spoke against it. But from 1435 to 1890, a succession of popes condemned the slave trade and slavery in no uncertain terms. The first pope to do so was Eugenius IV (r. 1431-1447), who in his 1435 bull Sicut Dudum demanded that Christians free all enslaved natives of the Canary Islands within fifteen days; failure to do so would incur automatic excommunication. Thus, fifty-seven years before Columbus’s first voyage, the Roman pontiff unequivocally prohibited the enslavement of native peoples.
In 1537, Pope Paul III (r. 1534-1549) issued a bull, Sublimus Dei, which taught that natives peoples were not to be enslaved. In 1591, Gregory XIV (r. 1590-1591) promulgated Cum Sicuti, which was addressed to the bishop of Manila in the Philippines and reiterated his predecessors’ prohibitions against enslaving native peoples. In the seventeenth century, Urban VIII (r. 1623-1644) promulgated Commissum Nobis (1639) in support of the Spanish king’s (Philip IV) edict prohibiting enslavement of the Indians in the New World.
The need for cheap and abundant labor in the colonies is what led to the African slave trade. This new form of bondage was also condemned by the popes, beginning with Innocent XI (r. 1676-1689). In 1741, Benedict XIV (r. 1740-1758) issued Immensa Pastorum, which reiterated that the penalty for enslaving Indians was excommunication. In 1839, Gregory XVI (r. 1831-1846) issued In Supremo to condemn the enslavement of Africans. Pope Leo XIII (r. 1878-1903) promulgated two bulls condemning slavery in 1888 and 1890.
I have regular debates with my own Caribbean family about the Catholic church and Christianity in general. 2 family members recently went on a trip to visit the Vatican and I thought to myself if I won tickets to go on an all-inclusive trip to the Vatican I would either:
a) Try to sell those tickets online and put the money to good use or
b) Burn the tickets in my backyard then jump up on down on the ashes if I didn't manage to sell them.
Just wondering why so called curious individuals fail to read the last testament. It has ALL the explanation they need. It is the only book that claims that it represents the direct words of the Creator himself and it has been faithfully preserved and memorized to the letter.
Islam instantly cures racism, alcoholism, drug addiction, pornography, fornication, adulatory, abortion, single-parent families. elderly neglect, wokism, homosexuality, gang culture and all other ills of this society.
Popes have talked against slavery at the time. There were Catholics that did slavery but the church never officially said to do it. The popes at the time spoke against it. But from 1435 to 1890, a succession of popes condemned the slave trade and slavery in no uncertain terms. The first pope to do so was Eugenius IV (r. 1431-1447), who in his 1435 bull Sicut Dudum demanded that Christians free all enslaved natives of the Canary Islands within fifteen days; failure to do so would incur automatic excommunication. Thus, fifty-seven years before Columbus’s first voyage, the Roman pontiff unequivocally prohibited the enslavement of native peoples.
In 1537, Pope Paul III (r. 1534-1549) issued a bull, Sublimus Dei, which taught that natives peoples were not to be enslaved. In 1591, Gregory XIV (r. 1590-1591) promulgated Cum Sicuti, which was addressed to the bishop of Manila in the Philippines and reiterated his predecessors’ prohibitions against enslaving native peoples. In the seventeenth century, Urban VIII (r. 1623-1644) promulgated Commissum Nobis (1639) in support of the Spanish king’s (Philip IV) edict prohibiting enslavement of the Indians in the New World.
The need for cheap and abundant labor in the colonies is what led to the African slave trade. This new form of bondage was also condemned by the popes, beginning with Innocent XI (r. 1676-1689). In 1741, Benedict XIV (r. 1740-1758) issued Immensa Pastorum, which reiterated that the penalty for enslaving Indians was excommunication. In 1839, Gregory XVI (r. 1831-1846) issued In Supremo to condemn the enslavement of Africans. Pope Leo XIII (r. 1878-1903) promulgated two bulls condemning slavery in 1888 and 1890.
The architecture is breath-taking but then you have to question why the church doesn’t liquidate assets to help the poor and starving. It’s so strange.
That’s why we must trust in God alone and not corrupt men!!!
God, not some saviour they created to subjugate us!
Which god out of all the religious cults?
Popes have talked against slavery at the time. There were Catholics that did slavery but the church never officially said to do it. The popes at the time spoke against it. But from 1435 to 1890, a succession of popes condemned the slave trade and slavery in no uncertain terms. The first pope to do so was Eugenius IV (r. 1431-1447), who in his 1435 bull Sicut Dudum demanded that Christians free all enslaved natives of the Canary Islands within fifteen days; failure to do so would incur automatic excommunication. Thus, fifty-seven years before Columbus’s first voyage, the Roman pontiff unequivocally prohibited the enslavement of native peoples.
In 1537, Pope Paul III (r. 1534-1549) issued a bull, Sublimus Dei, which taught that natives peoples were not to be enslaved. In 1591, Gregory XIV (r. 1590-1591) promulgated Cum Sicuti, which was addressed to the bishop of Manila in the Philippines and reiterated his predecessors’ prohibitions against enslaving native peoples. In the seventeenth century, Urban VIII (r. 1623-1644) promulgated Commissum Nobis (1639) in support of the Spanish king’s (Philip IV) edict prohibiting enslavement of the Indians in the New World.
The need for cheap and abundant labor in the colonies is what led to the African slave trade. This new form of bondage was also condemned by the popes, beginning with Innocent XI (r. 1676-1689). In 1741, Benedict XIV (r. 1740-1758) issued Immensa Pastorum, which reiterated that the penalty for enslaving Indians was excommunication. In 1839, Gregory XVI (r. 1831-1846) issued In Supremo to condemn the enslavement of Africans. Pope Leo XIII (r. 1878-1903) promulgated two bulls condemning slavery in 1888 and 1890.
Thank you my brother, and I would like to address the issue of continuing to call ourselves Black, African American, or Hispanic, because those are all labels from our oppressors!
Neither one of such labels are found in the Constitution, or in the Bible, but what is found is that the constitution calls us Moors, Africans called us Hebo's, and the Holy Bible calls us Hebrew Israelites.
I don’t care what y’all call yaselves! I care about protecting the children yall raping and trafficking 🤷🏿♀️🤬
We are Africans in the diaspora
Popes have talked against slavery at the time. There were Catholics that did slavery but the church never officially said to do it. The popes at the time spoke against it. But from 1435 to 1890, a succession of popes condemned the slave trade and slavery in no uncertain terms. The first pope to do so was Eugenius IV (r. 1431-1447), who in his 1435 bull Sicut Dudum demanded that Christians free all enslaved natives of the Canary Islands within fifteen days; failure to do so would incur automatic excommunication. Thus, fifty-seven years before Columbus’s first voyage, the Roman pontiff unequivocally prohibited the enslavement of native peoples.
In 1537, Pope Paul III (r. 1534-1549) issued a bull, Sublimus Dei, which taught that natives peoples were not to be enslaved. In 1591, Gregory XIV (r. 1590-1591) promulgated Cum Sicuti, which was addressed to the bishop of Manila in the Philippines and reiterated his predecessors’ prohibitions against enslaving native peoples. In the seventeenth century, Urban VIII (r. 1623-1644) promulgated Commissum Nobis (1639) in support of the Spanish king’s (Philip IV) edict prohibiting enslavement of the Indians in the New World.
The need for cheap and abundant labor in the colonies is what led to the African slave trade. This new form of bondage was also condemned by the popes, beginning with Innocent XI (r. 1676-1689). In 1741, Benedict XIV (r. 1740-1758) issued Immensa Pastorum, which reiterated that the penalty for enslaving Indians was excommunication. In 1839, Gregory XVI (r. 1831-1846) issued In Supremo to condemn the enslavement of Africans. Pope Leo XIII (r. 1878-1903) promulgated two bulls condemning slavery in 1888 and 1890.
Honestly most of the time you don't need a supernatural evil.... Mankind can be the very definition of evil......
Popes have talked against slavery at the time. There were Catholics that did slavery but the church never officially said to do it. The popes at the time spoke against it. But from 1435 to 1890, a succession of popes condemned the slave trade and slavery in no uncertain terms. The first pope to do so was Eugenius IV (r. 1431-1447), who in his 1435 bull Sicut Dudum demanded that Christians free all enslaved natives of the Canary Islands within fifteen days; failure to do so would incur automatic excommunication. Thus, fifty-seven years before Columbus’s first voyage, the Roman pontiff unequivocally prohibited the enslavement of native peoples.
In 1537, Pope Paul III (r. 1534-1549) issued a bull, Sublimus Dei, which taught that natives peoples were not to be enslaved. In 1591, Gregory XIV (r. 1590-1591) promulgated Cum Sicuti, which was addressed to the bishop of Manila in the Philippines and reiterated his predecessors’ prohibitions against enslaving native peoples. In the seventeenth century, Urban VIII (r. 1623-1644) promulgated Commissum Nobis (1639) in support of the Spanish king’s (Philip IV) edict prohibiting enslavement of the Indians in the New World.
The need for cheap and abundant labor in the colonies is what led to the African slave trade. This new form of bondage was also condemned by the popes, beginning with Innocent XI (r. 1676-1689). In 1741, Benedict XIV (r. 1740-1758) issued Immensa Pastorum, which reiterated that the penalty for enslaving Indians was excommunication. In 1839, Gregory XVI (r. 1831-1846) issued In Supremo to condemn the enslavement of Africans. Pope Leo XIII (r. 1878-1903) promulgated two bulls condemning slavery in 1888 and 1890.
@@princessc660 I honestly didn't know this .... The Catholic Church seems to mostly be on the right side of history when it counts
While, we go after and demand reparations for FBA here in America, our target isn't just the American government. Every level of government in the slave states from local to state. It doesn't end there. We are coming after businesses and corporations who were created because of American chattel slavery and they are still around today. There are alot of them still around today like your major banks and insurance companies. You know top ones based out of NYC! We also coming after the Catholic church as well! They all had their hands in our demise, subjugation, deaths, destruction, chaos and etc.
America, cut the check!
@@I2AmUS Not just checks.
Land as well.
The whyte boy has stolen more than 800,000 acres of land from us.
Think of where we would be today if that land wasn't stolen from us.
The wealth gap wouldn't be as large.
The Christian church period. ThT Baptist church lol
@@rahimi4762 You find something funny
@@johnt2831 that blk ppl keeping visiting and believing even after facts were presented. I will tell anyone of us that we need to visit Jamestown, VA
Since the age of 16, I removed myself from the church
and Christianity...
smart, took me a little longer! God Bless!
hei not all christian
Popes have talked against slavery at the time. There were Catholics that did slavery but the church never officially said to do it. The popes at the time spoke against it. But from 1435 to 1890, a succession of popes condemned the slave trade and slavery in no uncertain terms. The first pope to do so was Eugenius IV (r. 1431-1447), who in his 1435 bull Sicut Dudum demanded that Christians free all enslaved natives of the Canary Islands within fifteen days; failure to do so would incur automatic excommunication. Thus, fifty-seven years before Columbus’s first voyage, the Roman pontiff unequivocally prohibited the enslavement of native peoples.
In 1537, Pope Paul III (r. 1534-1549) issued a bull, Sublimus Dei, which taught that natives peoples were not to be enslaved. In 1591, Gregory XIV (r. 1590-1591) promulgated Cum Sicuti, which was addressed to the bishop of Manila in the Philippines and reiterated his predecessors’ prohibitions against enslaving native peoples. In the seventeenth century, Urban VIII (r. 1623-1644) promulgated Commissum Nobis (1639) in support of the Spanish king’s (Philip IV) edict prohibiting enslavement of the Indians in the New World.
The need for cheap and abundant labor in the colonies is what led to the African slave trade. This new form of bondage was also condemned by the popes, beginning with Innocent XI (r. 1676-1689). In 1741, Benedict XIV (r. 1740-1758) issued Immensa Pastorum, which reiterated that the penalty for enslaving Indians was excommunication. In 1839, Gregory XVI (r. 1831-1846) issued In Supremo to condemn the enslavement of Africans. Pope Leo XIII (r. 1878-1903) promulgated two bulls condemning slavery in 1888 and 1890.
I am an Indonesian about 80% of people in Indonesia has Africans DNA. We have a difficult time when the Netherland colonized and making Slavery Bussiness in Indonesia and millions of people has been killed.
In Islam Mohammad said you have to be white to get into Heaven. Blacks come from the left side. Mohammad was a red headed man who owned black slaves. Watch Christian Prince
😔
It's Terrible what happened in Indonesia.
My grandfather escaped from Indonesia.
I was born in Netherlands I am 25% Indonesian coz my grandfather married a Dutch woman.
Many of them are Israelites. Look at this scripture Deuteronomy 28:64 And the LORD shall scatter thee among all people, from the one end of the earth even unto the other; and there thou shalt serve other gods, which neither thou nor thy fathers have known, even wood and stone.
@@aoikaze416 sounds like it wasn't so terrible after all.
If your grandpa got to marry and live in Dutch society.
This further PROVES that Christianity was forced upon The Ancestors...
the Bible is black history
Popes have talked against slavery at the time. There were Catholics that did slavery but the church never officially said to do it. The popes at the time spoke against it. But from 1435 to 1890, a succession of popes condemned the slave trade and slavery in no uncertain terms. The first pope to do so was Eugenius IV (r. 1431-1447), who in his 1435 bull Sicut Dudum demanded that Christians free all enslaved natives of the Canary Islands within fifteen days; failure to do so would incur automatic excommunication. Thus, fifty-seven years before Columbus’s first voyage, the Roman pontiff unequivocally prohibited the enslavement of native peoples.
In 1537, Pope Paul III (r. 1534-1549) issued a bull, Sublimus Dei, which taught that natives peoples were not to be enslaved. In 1591, Gregory XIV (r. 1590-1591) promulgated Cum Sicuti, which was addressed to the bishop of Manila in the Philippines and reiterated his predecessors’ prohibitions against enslaving native peoples. In the seventeenth century, Urban VIII (r. 1623-1644) promulgated Commissum Nobis (1639) in support of the Spanish king’s (Philip IV) edict prohibiting enslavement of the Indians in the New World.
The need for cheap and abundant labor in the colonies is what led to the African slave trade. This new form of bondage was also condemned by the popes, beginning with Innocent XI (r. 1676-1689). In 1741, Benedict XIV (r. 1740-1758) issued Immensa Pastorum, which reiterated that the penalty for enslaving Indians was excommunication. In 1839, Gregory XVI (r. 1831-1846) issued In Supremo to condemn the enslavement of Africans. Pope Leo XIII (r. 1878-1903) promulgated two bulls condemning slavery in 1888 and 1890.
Lies if you look at Christianity history. Before slavery there was councils in Carthage hippo these were in North Africa
@@princessc660the doctrine of discovery issued by the Pope and Columbus diary says different
Thank you so very much for sharing this. Catholic church were some of the best at torturing people as well.
In addition, both Inquisitions were brought to the world courtesy of the Catholic Church!
@@cactusqltr M Muhammad
Absolutely right.
@@cactusqltr....The Catholic Inquisition was launched by Pope Innocent III in 1203, and streamlined about 20 years later by Pope Gregory IX. Their are the bust's of 2 Popes in the US Capitol. They are Innocent III and Gregory IX. But we need to give Innocent IV a shout out because it's said he came up with some of the most brutal ways of torture.
@@cactusqltr...Actually their were more than 2 Inquisitions, but yes, the Catholic Church is responsible for all of them. I'll bet you don't know at least one that you missed, although it wasn't called a Inquisition, it was called a califait, and non beleivers were called infadels and not heratics.
We need to forgive the Arabs too. They would castrate the black men and force African slaves to walk across the desert. The Arabs were vicious to the black slaves. The problem today is Libya is again selling black slaves.
The Bible is not religious it is a way of life for a certain group of people, the Israelites!
Yes It has to do. With hebrew bible the old testament, apart the phrophets that talked in the name of the LORD
I will never except THERE SO CALL GOD
Or any god for that matter
On BD
Popes have talked against slavery at the time. There were Catholics that did slavery but the church never officially said to do it. The popes at the time spoke against it. But from 1435 to 1890, a succession of popes condemned the slave trade and slavery in no uncertain terms. The first pope to do so was Eugenius IV (r. 1431-1447), who in his 1435 bull Sicut Dudum demanded that Christians free all enslaved natives of the Canary Islands within fifteen days; failure to do so would incur automatic excommunication. Thus, fifty-seven years before Columbus’s first voyage, the Roman pontiff unequivocally prohibited the enslavement of native peoples.
In 1537, Pope Paul III (r. 1534-1549) issued a bull, Sublimus Dei, which taught that natives peoples were not to be enslaved. In 1591, Gregory XIV (r. 1590-1591) promulgated Cum Sicuti, which was addressed to the bishop of Manila in the Philippines and reiterated his predecessors’ prohibitions against enslaving native peoples. In the seventeenth century, Urban VIII (r. 1623-1644) promulgated Commissum Nobis (1639) in support of the Spanish king’s (Philip IV) edict prohibiting enslavement of the Indians in the New World.
The need for cheap and abundant labor in the colonies is what led to the African slave trade. This new form of bondage was also condemned by the popes, beginning with Innocent XI (r. 1676-1689). In 1741, Benedict XIV (r. 1740-1758) issued Immensa Pastorum, which reiterated that the penalty for enslaving Indians was excommunication. In 1839, Gregory XVI (r. 1831-1846) issued In Supremo to condemn the enslavement of Africans. Pope Leo XIII (r. 1878-1903) promulgated two bulls condemning slavery in 1888 and 1890.
As far as I have researched, slavery was also present in countries that were predominantly Protestants. We should not forget that focusing on the wrong done by one group. They were all wrong. 😟
You neglect the fact the Catholic Church existed before all others, and they engaged in holy wars before all. The stole religious writing and relics, they still maintain this collections, they keep them locked away but a few people... Showing the draw of power and the greed, corruption built one of lie: god never created the catholic church, a Roman Emperor did... they been bullshiting the world ever since.
Popes have talked against slavery at the time. There were Catholics that did slavery but the church never officially said to do it. The popes at the time spoke against it. But from 1435 to 1890, a succession of popes condemned the slave trade and slavery in no uncertain terms. The first pope to do so was Eugenius IV (r. 1431-1447), who in his 1435 bull Sicut Dudum demanded that Christians free all enslaved natives of the Canary Islands within fifteen days; failure to do so would incur automatic excommunication. Thus, fifty-seven years before Columbus’s first voyage, the Roman pontiff unequivocally prohibited the enslavement of native peoples.
In 1537, Pope Paul III (r. 1534-1549) issued a bull, Sublimus Dei, which taught that natives peoples were not to be enslaved. In 1591, Gregory XIV (r. 1590-1591) promulgated Cum Sicuti, which was addressed to the bishop of Manila in the Philippines and reiterated his predecessors’ prohibitions against enslaving native peoples. In the seventeenth century, Urban VIII (r. 1623-1644) promulgated Commissum Nobis (1639) in support of the Spanish king’s (Philip IV) edict prohibiting enslavement of the Indians in the New World.
The need for cheap and abundant labor in the colonies is what led to the African slave trade. This new form of bondage was also condemned by the popes, beginning with Innocent XI (r. 1676-1689). In 1741, Benedict XIV (r. 1740-1758) issued Immensa Pastorum, which reiterated that the penalty for enslaving Indians was excommunication. In 1839, Gregory XVI (r. 1831-1846) issued In Supremo to condemn the enslavement of Africans. Pope Leo XIII (r. 1878-1903) promulgated two bulls condemning slavery in 1888 and 1890.
But ain't Pope Francis one of those who wear the red shoes???? People, go look that up and you will see why wearing this type of shoes is questionable...especially when saying that the person is speaking out against slavery...😑
You are soooooooo right. He is just like the Democrats who actually owned all the slaves, who are now pretending to care about them so they can start a race war. The current Pope was a bouncer at a nightclub when he was younger, and led many socialist's revolutions in South America, and has lots of blood on his hands. He is Catholic and a Jesuit Priest, as was Stalin.
Thank you for sharing,,my parents worked on plantations and I did to and got paid no moneys
Pope Francis does not wear the Red Shoes. He chose to wear the same Black dress shoes he has been wearing for decades, recently Pope Francis had new soles on his shoes. He literally had worn holes in the soles of the shoes. The frames of Pope Francis glasses are also many decades old. Pope Francis has two cassocks, that is the White garment that are worn by the Pope. Pope Francis chose to live in a Monastery rather than the Papal apartment, he eats with the brothers in the Monastery, rather than having meals prepared for him by the Papal cook. Pope Francis is a Jesuit Priest, who took a Vow of Poverty. Perhaps you might wish to do some research yourself, before casting stones at a man who seeks to lead the People of God in humility & preach the Gospel to lead souls to the knowledge of Salvation through Jesus Christ. 🎚
Did look it up and don't see anything alarming. Why do you just say it, whatever it is?!
@@annielathan5172 , The Civil War ended in 1865, how old & your parents & how old are you? I wrote earlier, the Catholic Church came out against slavery before any of these other denominations, there is no validity to this video. My ancestors were serfs & nearly worked themselves to death, the British Crown & hierarchy based society seized all property. Burning the shacks & lean toos they called homes. They were forced to leave or die at gun point. The British Royal family forced my family off their Islands & across the sea. My family is about 1/3 black & got no money. We want money too!
All nations that had a hand in this will answer for their deeds. They may have gotten by, but will never get away. Spiritual law always even out the score.
Great Job keep Exposing the Corruption
Popes have talked against slavery at the time. There were Catholics that did slavery but the church never officially said to do it. The popes at the time spoke against it. But from 1435 to 1890, a succession of popes condemned the slave trade and slavery in no uncertain terms. The first pope to do so was Eugenius IV (r. 1431-1447), who in his 1435 bull Sicut Dudum demanded that Christians free all enslaved natives of the Canary Islands within fifteen days; failure to do so would incur automatic excommunication. Thus, fifty-seven years before Columbus’s first voyage, the Roman pontiff unequivocally prohibited the enslavement of native peoples.
In 1537, Pope Paul III (r. 1534-1549) issued a bull, Sublimus Dei, which taught that natives peoples were not to be enslaved. In 1591, Gregory XIV (r. 1590-1591) promulgated Cum Sicuti, which was addressed to the bishop of Manila in the Philippines and reiterated his predecessors’ prohibitions against enslaving native peoples. In the seventeenth century, Urban VIII (r. 1623-1644) promulgated Commissum Nobis (1639) in support of the Spanish king’s (Philip IV) edict prohibiting enslavement of the Indians in the New World.
The need for cheap and abundant labor in the colonies is what led to the African slave trade. This new form of bondage was also condemned by the popes, beginning with Innocent XI (r. 1676-1689). In 1741, Benedict XIV (r. 1740-1758) issued Immensa Pastorum, which reiterated that the penalty for enslaving Indians was excommunication. In 1839, Gregory XVI (r. 1831-1846) issued In Supremo to condemn the enslavement of Africans. Pope Leo XIII (r. 1878-1903) promulgated two bulls condemning slavery in 1888 and 1890.
If you like and support channels like this, watch the ads for them if you can't support them otherwise. It helps a lot.
I will never recover from the Abuse I and my siblings received at the hands of the Catholic Upbringing, the Nuns and Catholic Brothers at Boarding School. The Abuse they allowed to Flourish by the other Boarders, etc!!!
Popes have talked against slavery at the time. There were Catholics that did slavery but the church never officially said to do it. The popes at the time spoke against it. But from 1435 to 1890, a succession of popes condemned the slave trade and slavery in no uncertain terms. The first pope to do so was Eugenius IV (r. 1431-1447), who in his 1435 bull Sicut Dudum demanded that Christians free all enslaved natives of the Canary Islands within fifteen days; failure to do so would incur automatic excommunication. Thus, fifty-seven years before Columbus’s first voyage, the Roman pontiff unequivocally prohibited the enslavement of native peoples.
In 1537, Pope Paul III (r. 1534-1549) issued a bull, Sublimus Dei, which taught that natives peoples were not to be enslaved. In 1591, Gregory XIV (r. 1590-1591) promulgated Cum Sicuti, which was addressed to the bishop of Manila in the Philippines and reiterated his predecessors’ prohibitions against enslaving native peoples. In the seventeenth century, Urban VIII (r. 1623-1644) promulgated Commissum Nobis (1639) in support of the Spanish king’s (Philip IV) edict prohibiting enslavement of the Indians in the New World.
The need for cheap and abundant labor in the colonies is what led to the African slave trade. This new form of bondage was also condemned by the popes, beginning with Innocent XI (r. 1676-1689). In 1741, Benedict XIV (r. 1740-1758) issued Immensa Pastorum, which reiterated that the penalty for enslaving Indians was excommunication. In 1839, Gregory XVI (r. 1831-1846) issued In Supremo to condemn the enslavement of Africans. Pope Leo XIII (r. 1878-1903) promulgated two bulls condemning slavery in 1888 and 1890.
That is why they said their Jesus is white and they are white and we are black and in their Bible slavery is ok written by who?
In Islam Mohammad said you have to be white to get into Heaven Blacks come from the left side. Mohammad was a red headed man who owned black slaves.
Exactly! our people are brainwashed, giving our power to caucasians who have done nothing but brutally torture us and kill us during their relatively short “civilisation” our people are literally dying of ignorance!
He was a Schasu ..Arabs that did take out Hurrians and Hittite(Europeans) of Canaan and did take their women ...how would you describe the descendants of that ...breed
@@dorianduka The Arabs would castrate the black slaves, not the white slaves. Mohammed said only white skin goes to Heaven. He said blacks are cursed. Blacks fail because of envy.
@sparkling...by White European Invaders who else? Look up who wrote the Bible & Serapis
Then go from there
Ham had three other sons that were not cursed. Cush, Mizraim, and Phut. Only Canaan was cursed.
And he settled Canaan (Israel) while the others went to the African Continent.
Where can we find this information? I'd like to know more.
@@fvfr6294 The Bible. They were ALL his GRANDSONS. Ham's sons.
Remember that Canaan was cursed by Noah, not God.
@@ModernHamite Good point cause 'for what God has blessed NO MAN can curse!'
This is so very sad,An which is still going on....
This video is good, but fails to state the historical facts that the Catholic compiled the Bible by including some texts and excluding other ancient texts. These slave verses were put in the Bible to serve the purpose that they were used for. They did not take Bible verse out of the context that those who put the Bible together intended. We worship the Bible instead of worshipping God in spirit and in truth. Religion and politics are companions that work together to keep the masses in mental and physical bondage.
I agree with you
Love thy neighbour. Easy. Unfortunately there are wolves in sheep's clothing pretending to be pious that try to justify their evil by twisting the teachings of Christ.
I always knew they us the Bible for their hate.
The Bible is a weapon but if you know the Bible they can't fool you you will win against these devils
The scar will remain in our hearts forever.
Thank you for a succinct summary of the issue. We may discuss and debate the issues the video highlights, but I would like to stress that we all have a moral imperative NOW to end human bondage. The UN estimates that over 40 million people are in some ways enslaved today. Child sex trafficking is the most odious and heinous expression of modern slavery. I encourage everyone to get involved in ending human trafficking. It's one thing to condemn the corrupt nature and apathy of people of the past toward slavery, but quite another to step and join the fight today!
But there is still a lot of work to be done as we witness today's onslaught of black people,pope francis or any other pope didn't do enough to alleviate slavery, as a matter of fact most of them promoted slavery.
What slavery are you talking about with pope Francis ?
I'm black but Portuguese.... When people ask me if I'm proud of being Portuguese I just tell them yes and no...
Cause our history is much more than slavery and stealing resources. But much of our history known to people in the world is more about slavery which is embarrassing to a black person ...but yeah great video !
Not 2 fba, we're the strongest peepl in the world and we are not ashamed of the injustice that our ancestors lived thru, it only made us strongest 🤬💯🎯
Jij ben aan het ontkennen je zij je zwaart en Portugees het kan gewoon niet om te zeggen ik zwaart maar te gelijk Chinees ,alleen wij zwarte denk zo stom een Chinees zal nooit zeggen ik ben Chinees maar ook een europeaan
My grandfather was born in Germany and raised in Portugal.
I'm learning a lot and my heart breaks. I love being black for so many reasons no matter how we historically been attacked we are still here and strong.
I am so glad there lies have came to the light.....❤😅
Florida is afraid to teach this to their white students. Keep telling our history. We will never forget.
Mybe School's should teach about Masa Musa or Tipu Tip, or mybe how slavery is still ongoing in Africa today or the slave trade in Libya; how about how it was the Europeans who fought to stop the Atlantic slave trade, while the kings of Africa refused, yes School should teach the truth.
I think they're more afraid to teach it to the Black students.
@@dhonda250r You know you've f*cked up when you have to resort to whataboutism.
‘Roman Catholic’ here,( Cape Verde) was used as a port for the trade. For, whom didn’t know or wasn’t at least aware of this?
Also, if anybody’s curious; I’ve seen things you’d never believe me or imagine you could do, when you learn what they keep secrets. No I’m not no damn bot lol
They wrote the bible with many councils . Is the bible historical?
@@toniportis6363 I wouldn’t say it’s not. I would say they keep the actual ‘real prophecies’ hidden for themselves and give us scriptures accordingly to the world (Pope and the elites governors) orders’…
@@toniportis6363Yes, that's why they took certain books out. It spoke and speaks of them. Our Father gives eyes to see.
I live on Church road. I never did and never will visit this church round the corner. No matter what.
Yeap ... The Spanish and Portuguese went to the Pope at the Time and asked Permission to import and Export Commodities and within the List was African Slaves and Permission was Granted in early 1440's ...
Excellent Video ... 👀🧐👍💯🔥
Nope! Give historical evidence. Popes have talked against slavery at the time. There were Catholics that did slavery but the church never officially said to do it. The popes at the time spoke against it. But from 1435 to 1890, a succession of popes condemned the slave trade and slavery in no uncertain terms. The first pope to do so was Eugenius IV (r. 1431-1447), who in his 1435 bull Sicut Dudum demanded that Christians free all enslaved natives of the Canary Islands within fifteen days; failure to do so would incur automatic excommunication. Thus, fifty-seven years before Columbus’s first voyage, the Roman pontiff unequivocally prohibited the enslavement of native peoples.
In 1537, Pope Paul III (r. 1534-1549) issued a bull, Sublimus Dei, which taught that natives peoples were not to be enslaved. In 1591, Gregory XIV (r. 1590-1591) promulgated Cum Sicuti, which was addressed to the bishop of Manila in the Philippines and reiterated his predecessors’ prohibitions against enslaving native peoples. In the seventeenth century, Urban VIII (r. 1623-1644) promulgated Commissum Nobis (1639) in support of the Spanish king’s (Philip IV) edict prohibiting enslavement of the Indians in the New World.
The need for cheap and abundant labor in the colonies is what led to the African slave trade. This new form of bondage was also condemned by the popes, beginning with Innocent XI (r. 1676-1689). In 1741, Benedict XIV (r. 1740-1758) issued Immensa Pastorum, which reiterated that the penalty for enslaving Indians was excommunication. In 1839, Gregory XVI (r. 1831-1846) issued In Supremo to condemn the enslavement of Africans. Pope Leo XIII (r. 1878-1903) promulgated two bulls condemning slavery in 1888 and 1890.
Nope don't need to ... There is this thing called Google but at least you know how to copy and paste ... 👍🙄... 😀😂🤣
They must be exposed. All day every day.
The Arabs would castrate the black slaves and not the white slaves. Mohammed said only white skin goes to Heaven, watch Christian Prince.
Yes, we must all keep on exposing them everyday until we get rid of them and their generations and take back our position of which stolen by them.
The Jews . You're right
Crossing the Red Sea Bible Story from the book of Exodus. Moses is chosen by God to lead the Israelites out of slavery in Egypt
But we don't come from Ham we come from Shem!
Faxx
I come from Ham.
What an insidious deed they did,as well those whom fought to abolish this act bless them for they are some of the ancestors we remember & won't soon forget as we continue to separate the wheat from the teres surge on!!¡!!!
The Catholic and the Christian churches have really not changed. They just made their message more generic as they watch Blacks in United States of Amerikkka, systematically murdered by white supremacy and it's race soldiers. I do not see these churches marching for justice for African Americans. They sing sweet hymns that don't mean ish, speak on scriptures that they do not even follow and put prayers in for Black people as they actively do nothing but read it in the news and MAYBE feel bad for Black people, Although I highly doubt it.
I have talked to Christians about these issues and they change subjects because they don't want to get involved as long as it is not them that is being persecuted. Many of them use that BS of pulling yourself up by your own bootstraps, which is clearly a phrase that was made originally for people that could not stand on their own without help from someone else or be in a system where fairness was actually a reality ( i e. Not the United States of America).
Christianity is a joke. It teaches blacks to put everything in " the hands of the Lawd". It mentally subjugates Black people into a sense of waiting on some magical baby that went into the sky and will redeem us to come help us one day. This is ish!
Again, the church has not changed. It supports slavery, economic and physical, all over the world, child abuse through pedophilia, and inequality all over the world against Blacks.
Although there are a few individual churches that fight these things, most churches are only worried about the dollars that they collect from people and the way they are able to bring people under their thumb for absolute control.
I am disgusted by the Christian Church by their lack of ineffectiveness and and purposeful lack of support for the things that go on in the world for Black people. It just doesn't seem to bother them or any other white supremacist organization to watch black people being systematically murdered, maimed, incarcerated, raped, traffic and these people never speak out about it. But they do give thoughts and prayers! 😳 Should we be grateful?
🎓😡😤😭💰💰😍🤣
Mohammad owned may slaves. In the Arab world Muslims sold both Black and White slaves by the millions. The word slave comes from the Slav. Africans bought millions of Slavic people.
Should we be grateful? No
so true
I'm black and I'm also angry at Christians because they do not fight injustice as Jesus has preached we should that is completely left out in Christian doctrine
Indeed the church did commit systemic wrongs.
Eye-opening video!
Popes have talked against slavery at the time. There were Catholics that did slavery but the church never officially said to do it. The popes at the time spoke against it. But from 1435 to 1890, a succession of popes condemned the slave trade and slavery in no uncertain terms. The first pope to do so was Eugenius IV (r. 1431-1447), who in his 1435 bull Sicut Dudum demanded that Christians free all enslaved natives of the Canary Islands within fifteen days; failure to do so would incur automatic excommunication. Thus, fifty-seven years before Columbus’s first voyage, the Roman pontiff unequivocally prohibited the enslavement of native peoples.
In 1537, Pope Paul III (r. 1534-1549) issued a bull, Sublimus Dei, which taught that natives peoples were not to be enslaved. In 1591, Gregory XIV (r. 1590-1591) promulgated Cum Sicuti, which was addressed to the bishop of Manila in the Philippines and reiterated his predecessors’ prohibitions against enslaving native peoples. In the seventeenth century, Urban VIII (r. 1623-1644) promulgated Commissum Nobis (1639) in support of the Spanish king’s (Philip IV) edict prohibiting enslavement of the Indians in the New World.
The need for cheap and abundant labor in the colonies is what led to the African slave trade. This new form of bondage was also condemned by the popes, beginning with Innocent XI (r. 1676-1689). In 1741, Benedict XIV (r. 1740-1758) issued Immensa Pastorum, which reiterated that the penalty for enslaving Indians was excommunication. In 1839, Gregory XVI (r. 1831-1846) issued In Supremo to condemn the enslavement of Africans. Pope Leo XIII (r. 1878-1903) promulgated two bulls condemning slavery in 1888 and 1890.
Thanks!
Thank you 🙋🏽♀️
This video should have a part 2 and 3
I am thankful to hear what really happened to our ancestors. I appreciate the history of what happened to our people.
This education needs to be spread to all social media platforms because it is not taught in public schools. Every race needs to know their ancestral history! Reach out to as many as possible
It is an abomination that they used religion to accomodate slavery it is sad and horrible and horrific 😢
What a lesson, thank you, brother.
Popes have talked against slavery at the time. There were Catholics that did slavery but the church never officially said to do it. The popes at the time spoke against it. But from 1435 to 1890, a succession of popes condemned the slave trade and slavery in no uncertain terms. The first pope to do so was Eugenius IV (r. 1431-1447), who in his 1435 bull Sicut Dudum demanded that Christians free all enslaved natives of the Canary Islands within fifteen days; failure to do so would incur automatic excommunication. Thus, fifty-seven years before Columbus’s first voyage, the Roman pontiff unequivocally prohibited the enslavement of native peoples.
In 1537, Pope Paul III (r. 1534-1549) issued a bull, Sublimus Dei, which taught that natives peoples were not to be enslaved. In 1591, Gregory XIV (r. 1590-1591) promulgated Cum Sicuti, which was addressed to the bishop of Manila in the Philippines and reiterated his predecessors’ prohibitions against enslaving native peoples. In the seventeenth century, Urban VIII (r. 1623-1644) promulgated Commissum Nobis (1639) in support of the Spanish king’s (Philip IV) edict prohibiting enslavement of the Indians in the New World.
The need for cheap and abundant labor in the colonies is what led to the African slave trade. This new form of bondage was also condemned by the popes, beginning with Innocent XI (r. 1676-1689). In 1741, Benedict XIV (r. 1740-1758) issued Immensa Pastorum, which reiterated that the penalty for enslaving Indians was excommunication. In 1839, Gregory XVI (r. 1831-1846) issued In Supremo to condemn the enslavement of Africans. Pope Leo XIII (r. 1878-1903) promulgated two bulls condemning slavery in 1888 and 1890.
You should Google the name of the first slave ship, very telling
Yes. Yes. Yes. U have to teach the younger ones their history
the older generation also ✌🏿✌🏿
Thank you for doing God’s work
Which god?
Thanks for the Great Great history lesson💯🙏🙏
Popes have talked against slavery at the time. There were Catholics that did slavery but the church never officially said to do it. The popes at the time spoke against it. But from 1435 to 1890, a succession of popes condemned the slave trade and slavery in no uncertain terms. The first pope to do so was Eugenius IV (r. 1431-1447), who in his 1435 bull Sicut Dudum demanded that Christians free all enslaved natives of the Canary Islands within fifteen days; failure to do so would incur automatic excommunication. Thus, fifty-seven years before Columbus’s first voyage, the Roman pontiff unequivocally prohibited the enslavement of native peoples.
In 1537, Pope Paul III (r. 1534-1549) issued a bull, Sublimus Dei, which taught that natives peoples were not to be enslaved. In 1591, Gregory XIV (r. 1590-1591) promulgated Cum Sicuti, which was addressed to the bishop of Manila in the Philippines and reiterated his predecessors’ prohibitions against enslaving native peoples. In the seventeenth century, Urban VIII (r. 1623-1644) promulgated Commissum Nobis (1639) in support of the Spanish king’s (Philip IV) edict prohibiting enslavement of the Indians in the New World.
The need for cheap and abundant labor in the colonies is what led to the African slave trade. This new form of bondage was also condemned by the popes, beginning with Innocent XI (r. 1676-1689). In 1741, Benedict XIV (r. 1740-1758) issued Immensa Pastorum, which reiterated that the penalty for enslaving Indians was excommunication. In 1839, Gregory XVI (r. 1831-1846) issued In Supremo to condemn the enslavement of Africans. Pope Leo XIII (r. 1878-1903) promulgated two bulls condemning slavery in 1888 and 1890.
Thank you for the video 💜
The reality is that the church enjoyed the privilege and reward of free labor. Why do you think they never took a stand against slavery back then.
Churches and Christian organizations also pays like zero taxes even back then. All of this while selling stuffs like pardon papers, holy water, stamps, cards and so on, essentially doing business and profitting from it but without any financial form of liability.
Juan, you can answer your own questions best by doing your own research....GOOGLE
There is a Big difference between a Modern Slave and a Biblical Slave / Servant!
Not what they did but what we "Still" allow them to do 😮😮😮😮😮
Curse was not on ham it was on his son cannan
By Noah not God.
@@ModernHamiteGod allowed it though.
@@tiffanydennis4227 Even if he did it no longer applies today.
Descendants of Canaanites today are not Cursed, they're people just like everyone else.
@@ModernHamite that’s because their curse has been lifted! And black people are still treated like shit!
Thanks because people dont know .
THIS WAS EXCELLENT! THANKYOU!!!
Can you do Islam next a lot black ppl don’t believe the atrocities that were committed in the name of Allah
Rape, murder, slavery
Thankfully someones said it😊
If black people supposedly descended from Ham and Ham,Shem,Japheth were brothers wouldn’t Shem and Japheth descendants be “black”as well?
We shouldn't ever forget these things for the sake of our children. So we may know what our enemies are capable of.
The Catholic church was not involved in slave trade, they sanctioned it!!! They provided the conscience for this atrocity!!
That's right .
It was not just the colour of skin, it was their possessions, gold, diamonds ect.
Excellent work.
Outstanding video
Thank you 😊
This is why they don't want this taught in school 🏫🏫 real history 🙄
Thanks brother for the info
This is amazing history and I’m so thankful to all of the information giving . With this I can help myself to understand better of life and how much each and every single one of us come to live with a special giving opportunity of life . Why I say this is because of different history, of different countries and their beliefs. With the slaves all over the world come different history .
Interesting narratives
I love your narratives a lot ❤❤❤
Payday is coming, thank God.
I was born catholic and baptised catholic as a child but I have never in my life identified as catholic nor do I believe in catholic.
I just feel there is a lot of evil in that religion no one wants to admit
This was perfect, thanks for this grreat work, big shout out from brazil
They made themselves GUILTY of manslaughter, why, because they all knew, WHAT WAS WRITTEN, and they took advantage of God's WORD( John1:1📜), and excecuted it, as they had the rights to do so.
Now all whom did and are still doing this atrocity, had and still have blood on their hands. To die in your SINS,... know that there are and will be NO INTERCESSOR to FREE YOU from ETERNAL death. May Jesus open their ( the living ones) eyes, and REPENT, for their guilt is committed is still at hand. Amen. Glory be to God. 🙏🏿🔥❤️
The TORAH is the legislative authority of the Bible
In Deuteronomy Chapter 15 | Verse 12 says 'that slavery lasts a maximum of 6 years'
** 12 If thy brother, a Hebrew man, or a Hebrew woman, be sold unto thee, he shall serve thee six years; and in the seventh year thou shalt let him go free from thee.
If you read Verse 18 carefully, you will see that 'a slave' is a day laborer for half the applicable daily wage.
Sincerely,
My heart is breaking. How can they treat black people like an animal, even animals has freedom than our own black people. I get very angry,whenever I watch such heartless video clip.
Popes have talked against slavery at the time. There were Catholics that did slavery but the church never officially said to do it. The popes at the time spoke against it. But from 1435 to 1890, a succession of popes condemned the slave trade and slavery in no uncertain terms. The first pope to do so was Eugenius IV (r. 1431-1447), who in his 1435 bull Sicut Dudum demanded that Christians free all enslaved natives of the Canary Islands within fifteen days; failure to do so would incur automatic excommunication. Thus, fifty-seven years before Columbus’s first voyage, the Roman pontiff unequivocally prohibited the enslavement of native peoples.
In 1537, Pope Paul III (r. 1534-1549) issued a bull, Sublimus Dei, which taught that natives peoples were not to be enslaved. In 1591, Gregory XIV (r. 1590-1591) promulgated Cum Sicuti, which was addressed to the bishop of Manila in the Philippines and reiterated his predecessors’ prohibitions against enslaving native peoples. In the seventeenth century, Urban VIII (r. 1623-1644) promulgated Commissum Nobis (1639) in support of the Spanish king’s (Philip IV) edict prohibiting enslavement of the Indians in the New World.
The need for cheap and abundant labor in the colonies is what led to the African slave trade. This new form of bondage was also condemned by the popes, beginning with Innocent XI (r. 1676-1689). In 1741, Benedict XIV (r. 1740-1758) issued Immensa Pastorum, which reiterated that the penalty for enslaving Indians was excommunication. In 1839, Gregory XVI (r. 1831-1846) issued In Supremo to condemn the enslavement of Africans. Pope Leo XIII (r. 1878-1903) promulgated two bulls condemning slavery in 1888 and 1890.
Wow!
THE CIVIL WAR
The historical fact is that the Civil War was a conflict between TWO slave nations - the USA and the CSA. The USA had already banned slavery in some states, but the same movement was growing in some CSA states as well. Historical revisionists have spent a little over 100 years trying to paint the Civil War as some idealistic righteous crusade against the injustice of slavery. That image doesn't hold up to the historical facts.
Pope Pius IX...
He called Jefferson Davis by the customary title "Honorable."
He acknowledged him as president of a nation.
In doing so, he effectively recognized the Confederate States of America as a sovereign entity, separate from the United States of America.
The pope's letter to Jefferson Davis was accompanied by an autographed picture of the pope.
Pope Pius IX was a revered figure in the post war South. General Robert E. Lee kept a portrait of him in his house, and referred to him as the South's only true friend during her time of need. Davis was frequently visited by Southern Catholic nuns during his imprisonment, who delivered messages for him and prayed for his release.
The Civil War was not fought over slavery. the Papacy who backed the South wanted to keep slavery because there was big money in it. This is where the issue of slavery came in at. Alexander H. Stephens a Catholic and VP of the Confederacy, was pro-slavery and a Papacy puppet. That's why the Confederacy was keeping slavery when it broke away. But once again, it was the Papacy making slavery as the object of the Civil War, when it was actually started over State Rights and the Federal Government trying to run the States and over taxation. Lincoln was imposing a tax to sport the failing northern economy as soon as he got in office. Slavery was already on the way out. The North also owned slaves, so tell me was the South fighting the North to get rid of Slavery in the North and vice-versa? I don't think so.
Lincoln: "From the beginning of our civil war, there has been, not a secret, but a public alliance, between the Pope of Rome and Jeff Davis, and that alliance has followed the common laws of this world affairs. The greater has led the smaller, the stronger has guided the weaker. The Pope and his Jesuits have advised, supported, and directed Jeff Davis on the land, from the first gun shot at Fort Sumter, by the rabid Roman Catholic Beauregard. They are helping him on the sea by guiding and supporting the other rabid Roman Catholic pirate, Semmes, on the ocean. And they will help the rebellion when firing their last gun to shed the blood of the last soldier of Liberty, who will fall in this fratricidal war. In my interview with Bishop Hughes, I told him, 'that every stranger who had sworn allegiance to our government by becoming a United States citizen, as himself, was liable to be shot or hung as a perjured traitor and an armed spy, as the sentence of the court-martial may direct. And he will be so shot and hanged accordingly, as there will be no exchange of such prisoners'. After I had put this flea in the ears of the Romish bishop, I requested him to go and report my words to the Pope. Seeing the dangerous position of his bishops and priests when siding with the rebels, my hope was that he would advise them, for their own interests, to become loyal and true to their allegiance and help us through the remaining part of the war. But the results have been the very contrary. The Pope has thrown away the mask, and shown himself the public partisan and the protector of the rebellion, by taking Jeff Davis by the hand, and impudently recognizing the Southern States as a legitimate government. Now, I have the proof in hand that that very Bishop Hughes, whom I had sent to Rome that he might induce the Pope to urge the Roman Catholics of the North at least, to be true to their oath of allegiance, and whom I thanked publicly, when, under the impression that he had acted honestly, according to the promise he had given me, is the very man who advised the Pope to recognize the legitimacy of the Southern Republic, and put the whole weight of his tiara in the balance against us in favor of our enemies! Such is the perfidy of those Jesuits. Two cankers are biting the very entrails of the United States today: the Romish and the Mormon priests. Both are equally at work to form a people of the most abject, ignorant and fanatical slaves, who will recognize no other authority but their supreme pontiffs. Both are aiming at the destruction of our schools, to raise themselves upon our ruins. Both shelter themselves under our grand and holy principles of liberty of conscience, to destroy that very liberty of conscience, and bind the world before their heavy and ignominious yoke. The Mormon and the Jesuit priests are equally the uncompromising enemies of our constitution and our laws; but the more dangerous of the two is the Jesuits the Romish priest, for he knows better now to conceal his hatred under the mask of friendship and public good: he is better trained to commit the most cruel and diabolical deeds for the glory of God. "Till lately, I was in favor of the unlimited liberty of conscience as our constitution gives it to the Roman Catholics. But now, it seems to me that, sooner or later, the people will be forced to put a restriction to that clause towards the Papists. Is it not an act of folly to give absolute liberty of conscience to a set of men who are publicly sworn to cut our throats the very day they have their opportunity for doing it? It is right to give the privilege of citizenship to men who are the sworn and public enemies of our constitution, our laws, our liberties, and our lives?
The 1830's and 40's saw nearly a million of immigrant Catholics from Ireland and elsewhere arriving desperate and poor in U.S. cities. The Irish numbers brought more influence to the Papacy and brought fear. Violence broke out to keep the Papacy's power in check, in the North and South. Catholic Churches were burned and other anti-Catholic sentiment.
The Civil War only exacerbated tensions between some Catholics and Protestants. Many nativist believed the Irish and other Catholics were disloyal and had no interest in fighting for or preserving the Union.
The abolition movement was also growing in the South before the war. The 13th Amendment that legally freed the slaves, (not the Emancipation Proclamation), was ratified by many Southern states before many Northern states. With the Emancipation Proclamation, the aim of the war changed to include the freeing of slaves in addition to preserving the Union. Although the Proclamation initially freed only the slaves in the rebellious states, by the end of the war the Proclamation had influenced and prepared citizens to advocate and accept abolition for all slaves in both the North and South. The 13th Amendment, which abolished slavery in the United States, was passed on December 6th, 1865. This all happening while the war was in progress
The beginning of slavery I believe started with Nimrod, since he was given the first kingdom on earth and he made slaves of his own kin.
Genesis 9:25 And he said, Cursed be Canaan; a servant of servants shall he be unto his brethren.
Nimrod came from that line and there has been slavery since that time and there will still be at Yahweh's return, proven by the next verse.
Revelation 6:15 Then the kings of the earth, the princes, the generals, the rich, the mighty, and EVERY SLAVE and every free man hid in caves and among the rocks of the mountains. They called to the mountains and the rocks, “Fall on us and
Muslims were enslaving black Africans long before any slave ships sailed for the New World. Over 28 Million Africans have been enslaved in the Muslim world during the past 14 centuries.
While much has been written concerning the Transatlantic slave trade, surprisingly little attention has been given to the Islamic slave trade across the Sahara, the Red Sea and the Indian Ocean. While the European involvement in the Transatlantic slave trade to the Americas lasted for just over three centuries, the Arab involvement in the slave trade has lasted fourteen centuries, and in some parts of the Muslim world is still continuing to this day.
A comparison of the Muslim slave trade to the American slave trade reveals some interesting contrasts. While two out of every three slaves shipped across the Atlantic were men, the proportions were reversed in the Muslim slave trade. Two women for every man were enslaved by the Muslims.
While the mortality rate for slaves being transported across the Atlantic was as high as 10%, the percentage of slaves dying in transit in the Transsahara and East African slave trade was between 80 and 90%!
While almost all the slaves shipped across the Atlantic were for agricultural work, most of the slaves destined for the Muslim Middle East were for sexual exploitation as concubines, in harems, and for military service.
While many children were born to slaves in the Americas, and millions of their descendants are citizens in Brazil and the USA to this day, very few descendants of the slaves that ended up in the Middle East survive.
While most slaves who went to the Americas could marry and have families, most of the male slaves destined for the Middle East were castrated, and most of the children born to the women were killed at birth.
Slavery has been justified by Mohammed’s example, as laid out in the Koran and in the records of the Islamic prophet’s words and deeds called the “hadiths.” In addition, Mohammed’s father was named by what has become a common Muslim appellation, Abd-Allah or Abdullah, which means “Slave of Allah,” a moniker proudly worn by millions of Muslims. Islam itself means “submission,” as in being a slave to Allah’s will.
“A believing slave is better than an idolater…”
Muhammad, Quran 2:221
“…you may marry other women who seem good to you: two, three, or four of them. But if you fear that you cannot maintain equality among them marry one only or any slave-girls you may own.”
Muhammad, Quran 4:3
“Blessed are the believers…who restrain their carnal desires (except with their wives and slave-girls, for these are lawful to them…)…”
Muhammad, Quran 23:1
“Prophet, We have made lawful for you the wives to whom you have granted dowries and the slave-girls whom God has given you as booty…”
Quran 33:50
“Mohammed had many male and female slaves. He used to buy and sell them, but he purchased more slaves than he sold, especially after God empowered him by His message, as well as after his immigration from Mecca. He once sold one black slave for two…. His purchases of slaves were more than he sold….”
Ty 4taking thetime 2write outthat History-
Hopefully manywill takethe time2 readit.
Myron Fagan-
A 50 year old recording
From 1967
runsthe rabbit2 thebottom ofthe hole.
Lucifers seed-
Adam Wieshap- jesuit founder ofthe illuminati-
Beye ofgood courage-
~THE~KING~
Yashua HaMashiac
shall. return.
HalleluYah
Some of the most important passages that either directly or indirectly address slavery were most likely left out of what the slaveholders read to their slaves. They passed laws against allowing slaves to learn to read in part to hide these passages from them. Here they are.
1. Whoever kidnaps a man, whether he sells him or is found with him in his possession, shall surely be put to death. Exodus 21:16
There would have been no slave trade without kidnapping. This passage is pretty clear about how God sees kidnapping people and then selling them as slaves.
2.But if you are able to gain your freedom, avail yourself of the opportunity. 1 Corinthians 7:21
This speaks for itself. God wills for us to live in freedom, not bondage.
3.Truly, I say to you, as you did it to one of the least of these my brothers, you did it to me. Matthew 25:40
4. Love your neighbor as yourself. Mark 12:31
It is impossible to stand before the Lord God on the day of judgement and claim that you loved your neighbor as you loved yourself if you enslaved another human being and committed the atrocities that these slaveholders did. If they died unrepentant, there is a place in hell waiting for them.
Please do not blame a loving God for what wicked people who claimed membership in a particular church have done.
Sick culture.
Truth!
Ecclesiasticus 12:10 Never trust thine enemy: for like as iron rusteth, so is his wickedness.
I’m actually curious about this one.
I'm a Catholic, but I need to know the truth.
The truth is your religion is a fraud .
You are not going to find the truth here.
Do your own research I hope you are prepared for the truth
I remember as a child in the 1950's when a White Bus driver told my mother to get off and go to the back door to get on. She just did it even though it was wrong and the law said she didn't have to.
Thank you
Was there ever a black Pope?
No. They too racist for that and they still are. Praying to a Mary and all those RITUALS.
Fu..k no
All Western nations owe reperations to formerly enslaved people.
You speak to truth.
Never forget!!
God never cursed anyone for the color of their skin. Also. Man does not have that power to curse someone because they are misbehaving. That's why God says do not add to the Bible or take from it. This is what you get if you do - lies!
Black people ruled for centuries until 1492. If anything I can say, we were punished because of idolatry. That punishment is gone!***read your bible****
@@flowersandcandyPlease pray for me seriously. I BACKSLIDDer and had the holy Spirit but TRICKED they are Poisoning me and I need healing and back how I was not sinning Destruction. O WOULD NOT HAVING DONE THIS. WHY WOULD GOD DO THIS and not let me me Spiritually whole and stop. He knew I don't want to be on the WOLRD and I want my soul life. This is not me.
@@flowersandcandyWhat idolatry?
@@mljm_mljm Worshipping false God's. Look it up. It's all in the OT.
@@TriciaRP 💕You are not a backslider, a sinner, or anything else negative. Please do not listen to European lies and nonsense all made up to keep us (Black People) brainwashed and enslaved. Black Africans had the so called Christ consciousness for hundreds and thousands of years before there was any such thing as caucasians or such thing a white man allegedly dying on a cross for us - it’s all fairytales. If you can, please trying and sit quietly and meditate. You’ll find your own answers and healing. Please stay safe. Peace and blessings. 💕