China's Fujian Supercarrier At Sea Is Stunning To Behold!
Vložit
- čas přidán 11. 09. 2024
- We answer some common questions about the Fujian and debunk the obvious myths. It is also a great opportunity to show high-quality images of the Type 003 underway.
Want to support the channel?
/ eurasianavalinsight
www.buymeacoff...
Keywords: Type 003, PLAN, PLA Navy, Chinese Navy, modern warships, naval technology, electromagnetic catapult, military, Sovremenny.
What a proud moment for the Motherland! I've never been more proud to be Chinese.
You proud for what .. proud for stealer.abuses .
Do you eat dog, cat, bat and cock like all the yellow chinese do??
Proud of one copy of a USA carrier. No pla admirals have naval combat experience except against Small Philippines ships. lol. Ccp fears USA naval and air superiority. Any ccp military facts from u?
@@danielb7253haha another western clown jealousy. Even our space station are better than yours . Cry harder clown 😂
@@danielb7253 if US so powerful then come fight haha
The Chinese talk less but they produce what they want in time and speed. Unlike some countries, they talk and boost like the things that pop out tomorrow, unfortunately it took them more than a decade, by the time they completed, it's going old and rusty.
Dream is good medicine for poor people.
Ccp and culture all about showing face. Talk less? Boast the most. lol
@@danielb7253 Someone said that , China stollen all US future's technology !😁😂
Umm, they took 2 decades to produce a carrier that's still inferior to the Nimitz class carriers produced 50 years ago. They don't have any aircraft that can even use CATOBAR equipment. Their sortie rate is inferior. The carrier is slower. It's non-nuclear with far less range. The electromagnetic catapult isn't even proven to work with combat levels of sortie rates and real aircraft and it's known not to work in range.
I’m India, You are calling me?
As a kid who loved big ships as a child in the 80s, seeing a Sovremenny Class destroyer brings a smile to my face.
I use to doodle the sovremenny class and the ss n 22 middiles 😂
The Fujian aircraft carrier features an integrated mast, which I haven't seen on other aircraft carriers.
Good reason. Costly and inefficient. I guess they could figure out how to make it modular like the rest of the world.
@@kitcarpo4745 China is a top player of electrical engineering. It is capable of such integration system. Don't worry
@@user-pq8lz3ip3q It's not that it's hard to do, it's the easier option to integrate it. In the long term the value of that boat is reduced and it's military impact the same.
@@kitcarpo4745 ever hear of stealth?
This proves that PLA already has a higher level of mature technology and a more reasonable system configuration, so that each device can not interfere with each other.
Though it is not a nuclear-powered aircraft carrier, it is still a great breakthrough for Chinese aircraft carrier development!
In the era of hyper-sonics, large ships are obsolete. The only thing broken through is the bank balance. Better to give that money to the poorest of society.
And soon China will steal more western technology. Tofu navy.
Ask indians and Americans to do that. :)
@@fungames24 China leads by example.... China lifted 800m out of poverty you might not have heard of it, your govs have hidden this fact, China isnt just spending and excelling, it is also helping its own people as well as other nations
China's carriers are designed for near shore defense oriented operation to safeguard sovereignty , not half a world away to invade, threaten other nations.
Would never get sick of the Fujian. Or this channel.
Yeah I came here to say that. It's super exiting to hear about a new aircraft carrier being launched, not matter what country is doing it.
As an aircraft carrier, it cannot sail alone and must deploy related frigates and submarines at the same time. And when the frigate is not nuclear-powered, it does not mean much just that the aircraft carrier is nuclear-powered, at least it does not mean much to the current Chinese Navy. The combat capability of an aircraft carrier battle group depends on training. The actual combat capability of U.S. aircraft carriers, except against Japan during World War II, is to shuttle between oceans. The combat capabilities of aircraft carriers during World War II were completely different from modern ones. Is that considered experience? The flight training time of Chinese pilots reaches more than 200 hours per year, which is almost the same as the training time of American pilots.
The experience of flight operations is the same. The naval exercises coordinating other ships is the same, save for the case where the operational endurance of the carrier is limited due to need to refuel. Then again, it gives the opportunity to practice underway refueling.
I’m told the flight hours of America fighter pilots have been reduced to 160 hours a year in recent years.
but wait-up!... the fourth one is being built even as we speak... and it will be nuclear powered... and the fifth one is being designed also...
Unfortunately, with the economic, social and political turmoil in China, CCP might not be around any longer. Chinese people deserve better governance and leadership than from Xi Jinping. #CCPDaysAreNumbered
The fourth is unlikely to be nuclear powered. It is most likely to be the same as the third. Chinese navy used to build 2 ships of same class for faster technology iteration with smaller steps. The fifth might be nuclear powered.
@@yuguan6013 i heard that this third one is actually a hybrid. the propulsions are diesels but the catapults are powered by small nuclear reactors.
@@yuguan60132nd been put on hold because of fund shortages
@@yuguan6013 It will be nuclear with Fujian shape. Fujian is the model for future Chinese nuclear carriers.
Very impressive to see the Fujian conducting their Sea Trials. Looking forward to see footage of the J35s and J15s EMALS launches and landing trials in the near future.
This GIANT AC STEEL IS NOT YET PROVEN IN COMBAT!
IT ONLY SATISFY THE EYES OF THE COMMUNIST CHINESE!
NOT EVEN IN THE CLASS OF JAPANESE PROVEN AIRCRAFT CARRIERS!
3 yrs and counting. USA ford has troubles also. But we have tons of combat experience and our admirals didn’t buy their ranks.
@@danielb7253 Buying rank? You mean like a lawyer became the head of NASA who recently claimed the dark side of the moon is always dark, as THE HEAD OF NASA, omg
@@danielb7253 I'll give that the uS has lots of combat experience chasing goatherders in Iraq and Afghanistan, but naval combat experience? When was the US's last naval engagement? Even the UK with its 80s Falkland wars with Argentina has more recent naval combat experience than the US.
@@JA-pn4ji forgetting Operation Desert Storm already? last large amphibious landing done by anyone last time 16inch guns used in battle
How can one get tired of amazing content on the Fujian? What a beauty!
I believe if they are going to build a nuclear Aircraft carrier, it would be a clean, efficient and safe nuclear generators powerhouse.
If
China should patrol the East Coast of USA with berthing rights in Cuba/Carribean, to guarantee Freedom of navigation near US waters.
China is not the United States, and China has no interest in hegemony
That's already happening....
@sydneystout4003 Ohh who is out there preventing container ships from docking? Oh yea, the Ansar Allah, but they are doing that to fight against a gen*cide, one started by a western colonial settler enthnostate and supported unconditionally by the collective west.
It is necessary to deploy an aircraft carrier base in the Gulf of Mexico
@@kingwing3203 >> The U.S. will never permit “aircraft carrier bases” in Cuba or Mexico. Educate yourself.
It's very clean and beautiful ship
这是一艘维护世界和平之舟，也是中华之盾。❤
_Should sail and dock around Asia and Africa to show them the U.S. no longer dominates the high seas_
Jy is dom, jy kan nie sien net in vlak water kan daardie verouderde drywende skip beweeg nie Dit gaan nie ver karma om leiers te beplan wat altyd ons vriende boelie nie
Won't be long before we all find out. It's going to be modified into a submarine.
OMG, what language is that?
Boerenl#ll€n taal?
its in test phase. of course it will sail around the world.
We don't want to spend the money protecting sea lanes for ingrate countries. Ours and our friends will be protected. Runes on gasoline? Will it ever run out while at sea? lol.
Will Nancy Pelosi still shout out, " WHAT A BEAUTIFUL SIGHT TO BEHOLD?"😂😂😂
Of course, it's happening in her country.
Sigh....another maga nutjob.......and even if she did, she would be right, the Fujian is a very beautiful looking ship.
Too many dirty politicians like her destroying America 🇺🇸!
@@职业喷子 😆 🤣 😂 😹 😆 🤣
Its already happening, look at US college campuses.
I am not a military strategist. But judging from the latest conflicts such as Ukraine, the next battle will be determined by satellites, radars, missiles and drone. Especially drones. The country with the better and most satellites, radars, missiles and drones will win. At this moment, China will come out ahead.
The country with SpaceX will win. In all fairness, China’s growth is impressive. The devil is in the details, though, as we say in the West.
And the capability to do emergency launchs of replacement satellites in case of 'battle' damage.
那是陆地上的战争，航母战斗群是海战。
Satelites dont matter. They cant be protected. Its simply impossible.
However drones are they key. Missiles too
We build the navy is preparing for the future space exploration in the next 30 - 50 years.
if you compare Fujian aircraft carrier superstructure on the starboard with it on Ford class, you will see a big difference, why? that's is because China has much advanced 5G and phased array Radar system.
That still changes nothing and American carriers can still win no prob. But the carrier is alright.
@@Obsidian_Official_ imagine a war between USA and China without using Nuks in 2035, the first wave of attack towards USA Carriers is dozens of Drone Carriers, the fleet may survey and destroyed all drone carries, but fired almost all ammunition, what the USA fleet can do to the second wave attack from aircraft carries, surrender or vanish in the ocean. the Chinese ship built capacity is 200 X then it of USA has. China drone built capacity is at lease 10 times then it in USA.
@@johnwe4431 You think US carriers would carry little ammunition? Bro think about it..
American carriers have enough force to bomb yemen for 3 days yet not enough for drones?
@@johnwe4431 Plus US carriers will never venture alone.. they atleast have 15 ships to guard them. Thats why its called a fleet.
@@johnwe4431 You think American carriers carry little ammunition? You must be dumb enough to think that
America is nearly $35 trillion in debt; it costs $1 trillion per year to service that debt. In say another 10+ years, it is conceivable the debt will rise to $60 trillion dollars and the cost to service that debt, will likely be $2 trillion per year. At some point where the debt and the ability to service it, one wonders how far into the path for default is America already descended into? Based on $5 trillion per year of revenue the IRS collects, if say half that is used to service the debt, descending into default is perhaps a hop, skip and a jump away. When one runs out of money, that has a way of shutting down the spending party and living the high life.
美国有战争机器保护核动力印刷机😂
It is accumulating up to 1 trillion every 3 months.
You're right. It is going to be funny to see America unable to support its huge budget and then they are going to cut into social programs, the only things keeping the country from going bonkers to save their MIC. Then the sparks will fly. Hundreds of millions of guns out there, a desperate population, a tone-deaf political elite, an insatiable capitalist class bend on hoovering up everything. I got my popcorn and soda ready for the show.
美国债务买单人将会是他的奴隶国，中国正在去美元化，再过几个月中国的美债全球第二将会被英国替代。
As long as the US dollar is the sole reserve currency of trade in the world as well as being the sole petrol dollar accepted by OPEC, then the US can afford its huge debt load.
You have to remember, America's number one export is not weapons, or cars, or grains and other food stuffs, nor raw materials ect, it money, the good old green back.
You want to buy crude oil from OPEC or foreign goods, then you need US dollars to: buy them.
And to get those dollars, you need to either buy them, sell your goods to 3rd party nations for US dollars or trade your national products, goods and services at a discounted rate to the US.
Here's the rub, as long as this state of affairs remains the status quo, the the US is golden.
The day the US dollar ceases to be sole reserve currency of trade, or OPEC decides to open up its markets to a basket of currencies such as the British Pound, the Euro, the Japanese Yen or even the Chinese New Yuen, then it is game over for the US and its economy.
And cracks have started to appear in the US dollar hegemony as various nations are signing trade deals with one and other to trade their goods and services in their respective currencies.
China and Australia had entered into such a deal, although I am not sure it still being honoured given the tension between the two at this time.
The BRIC nations are not only looking to expand their membership, but are actively working on developing their own currency along the lines of the Euro.
In the meantime, various members of OPEC are grumbling and making noise about ditching the US dollar and opening up their markets to other currencies.
Right now, the US is okay, but for how long is anybodies guess.
Like China, you’re copying others idea
The Fujian has an operational EMAL system.
US is still struggling with its EMAL system on USS Ford.
It is because the American EMALS system design is flawed. They use AC power and flywheel energy storage devices. While the Chinese uses DC power and supercapacitor. The Chinese design is more reliable.
Grab you're cock a bit harder, and you'll see Christ rise. f wit
@@Moeflyer6213Not flawed. My speculation is only the available technology. The Fujian laid its keel about 2018 while the Ford laid its keel sometime about 2010
"US is still struggling with its EMAL system on USS Ford."
Meanwhile the US Ford: launching Growler, Super Hornet, Hawkeyes, and Lightning II at the Mediterranean Sea.
So they claim ~ 😂😂😂😂😂
Well done China Super Carrier going Sea trials ahead of schedule. 💪💪👏👏👍👍💯💯♥️♥️
They have moved the goalposts 5 times. It was way over schedule same as Americas first electromagnetic flight deck.
tay3532... bravo china!
BRAVO to China 🇨🇳 PLA !!
Thanks, we do our best.
The steam generators may be used to drive electric generators and the electricity produced, to drive electric propellers. At present there are no means of knowing for sure. But if steam generators or oil-powered generators are used, they can be replaced in the future by a nuclear reactor (thorium reactor?) to convert the Fujian into a nuclear powered Carrier. This should also explain why the Fujian could also generate enough ready power to power the EMALS without breaking sweat so to speak.
Could be a hybrid carrier. China is at the forefront of electrification.
All the other ships are diesel powered. Nuclear is USELESS
this ship is no power,,a hunk of junk
@@williamblomster2387 so are you
@@soowo5942 you are a Chinese Communist
Good arguement on the topic of, the US has 100yrs experience. This carrier skipped over the steam catapult technology entirely. Hopefully it won't take as long to get these working as it did for the US's Ford carrier.
But carriers are expensive, and have a ~50yr service life. Unmanned fighter aircraft and unmanned bombers may dominate naval aviation in 10yrs time. All the time and money spent on 5 gen fighters for this carrier, might it be better to concentrate on the next step? Skipping over the steam catapult was a good idea. In the autoindustry, the switch to EV enabled China to leap ahead. Building a copy of the Ford carrier but 5 years later is a way to catch up. But it is not a way to leap ahead.
Except it's not a copy of the Ford carrier, if you care to understand the technological differences between the two.
This ship is bigger than I thought, China does not need to build anything bigger than this they can standardise this and build one more of this and two other nuclear powered of this. But this is China they can build big
003 is the first one with initial design, netizens in China social network have been complaining some designs that needs revise. the second one is being built with mod, which will be a little bit bigger and longer. hopefully we can see it late this year or mid next year.
Based on the pennant numbers, we're left with 15 slots for the aircraft carriers (16-30). China is going to need a fleet that can operate in the distant seas to safeguard its interests abroad
If China builds a Carrier bigger than the FORD class carriers,
it will SHATTER America EGOs bigtime.
That's what the BRI is for, so the west has a more difficult time thwarting other countries from trading with one another freely! @@EthanX1ao
I assume the type 004 will be this size or relative to it but nuclear powered, and the type 005 will be a nimitz sized one.
It said that Chinese method of Electromagnetic Catapult is more reliable than US EMALS
idk if its related, but some says China which have 4 Maglev line operational - one of them since 21 years ago
which gave them some first hand experience, of building and know how expertise on realibility of Electromagnetic acceleration
make me think there prob some truth to those claims
China follows the user propaganda methods of over estimating and straight-up lying about capabilities and statistics.
While ths usa has a long track record of underestimating its ability to the media in its form of propaganda.
Essentially if if the US claims a jet can go Mach 1, it probably does mach 1.5.
While China claim of Mach 1 probably means Mach .7, and full Mach 1 on a dive
This is a toy junk garbage 😂
They are not exactly the same, they are just tangentially related in that they both used Lorentz force to propel something forward but mastery of electromagnetic propulsion is not some sort of super duper secret. The science and math have been there for ages, it is the material science, the engineering know-how that are needed to make them practical to be used daily.
@@dexvilla8038"toy junk garbage" = your ÎQ
Tell us about the 2 2nd-hand carriers of little-D-boi's country.
🏳️1962🏳️
An awesome sight to behold.
They learn how to operate in time..nobody starts knowing all
Yup, it is such a dumb and obviously bad faith argument. Does the PLAN need more experience and training? Of course they do! Will there be accidents in the future? Sure they will be, carrier operations are dangerous and accidents are a matter of time.
Looks beautiful.
Forget about the one BS factor US forces and its allies boast about : nearly 100 years experience in operating aircraft carriers compared to PLAN one decade experience. If that’s the only advantage US navy and its allies have, the game is over.
What is 100 years experience ? Worst case scenario is one year experience repeated 100 X. Or at best 2 years experience repeated 50X. Add on to this experience nonsense, those sailors with experience in first 80 years are either retired or dead. So at most, experience gap may not exist.
Experience also comes with its burdens. That’s bad habit and mentality plus oldies have problems operating new technologies. US aircraft carriers today lack experience taking on another carrier challenging them as it only operates in support of counter terrorism operations with adversaries carrying light guns and wearing sandals.
Those sandal wearing fighters are a much tougher and far more fearless enemy than you little emperors lol
@@DCrypt1
The same toughness and daredevil attitude of the People’s Volunteer Army that went into Korea in 1950 against the heavily armed U.S. forces and its allies under the UN
@@markliuzx8789in recent years, American soldiers has experience in fighting insurgents using modern weapons while Chinese soldiers has experience fighting the Indians using medieval weapons.
So, which one is better?
@@paulsteaven they didn't gain that much experience as the Sikhs or Gurkhas (correct me if I'm wrong) either bashed or threw them down the cliffs of Ladakh. The wumaos really stepped up their keyboard propaganda since then.
When firearms are not permitted by both PLA and Indian army as per agreement, both sides resorted to medieval weapons which shows how tough and willing both sides are to fight bravely to protect their territorial claims. If firearms were not forbidden on LAC, casualties would be much higher.@paulsteaven
Ppl are forgetting the USS Kitty Hawk CV-63 was also a conventional powered Aircraft carrier and served many years before it was retired.. in the past Japan didn't allow nuclear powered carriers near it's bases, so Kitty Hawk was being non nuclear was stationed in Japan, but of cos this was later relaxed.
The Kitty Hawk was also 80,000 tons when fully loaded so the Fujian is like a USS Kitty Hawk with EM catapult
The Japanese are dumping nuclear sewage into the ocean
pretty sure the USN was a brown water non global navy with the kitty hawk class. That's that the experts tell me - can't be blue water without nuclear carriers
@@RichardsMiscCorner American Navy was blue water long before we had nuclear powered vessels. Nuclear power realized the full potential of what we already had. But, all of that has been negated by the EEOC and related agendas imposed on it.
congrats! China finally catches up to a 1960 USS Kitty Hawk carrier technology! Amazing!
@@BlackPill-pu4vi you must have completely missed the sarcasm.
I think the level of ship design is definitely superior to the Nimitz, not to mention the J-15 suppressing the F-18, J-35 pressuring the F-35, and the new early warning aircraft being much stronger than the E-2 of years ago. Moreover, their long-range missiles are far ahead. Not to mention their electronic warfare dominance over the US Navy. Once combat capability is formed, they have the upper hand against the Ford. Can't imagine what the next 4th aircraft carrier will be like.
this is all fake,,nothing real about this
You have no way of knowing that. Just more CCP talking points designed to mask their inferiority complex. It’s far more likely to be copy cat junk.
Yeah and the F-15 and F-22 suppressing and pressuring the J15 and J35 and also the chinese made aircraft is clearly inferior to american aircraft, i mean America has both quantity and quality. China has ok aircraft mostly because almost all of thier aircraft are copied from other countries designs.
Not sure about the J-15 being able to suppress the latest models of F-18's, as she is basically a development from the SU-33 model of Flankers. Plus the PLAN apparently only has 60 of them on hand.
And it should be noted that even the Russians now consider the Flanker line to have reached their development max and is now becoming an obsolete design.
Both the F-35 and J-35's have truely yet to be tested in combat. The land based version of the F-35 has seen some limited combat with the Israeli Air Force in attacking Iranian targets, but thats about it.
As for the J-35, she is still under development and is not yet ready for full fleet service. And like the J-15's, there is a very limited number of them available.
I would say it is a bit early to say which is the better combatant, the F-35 or the J-35. But for now the F-35 has the edge as it is already on deployment and its pilots are getting experience in using it.
A lot of the systems you are talking about again have not been tested in actual combat situtations, so their real world utility has yet to be proven. They maybe superiour, on-par with or even sub-par against currently NATO systems, only time will tell.
But yeah, I do agree with you, their gen 4 carriers shold be very interesting.
Good Lord, you don’t know any of that or if any of these Chinese weapons and sensors even work worth a damn. No doubt you were one of the people that made Putin and his weapons were 10 feet tall until they and Putin failed miserably in Ukraine.
*AWESOME Congratulations to China Navy*
Beautiful ship,but watch how westerners call this thing a useless piece of crap...
It's crazy how the collective west(and Japan) perceive China to be weaker than Uganda.
Nevertheless,a job well done by China!
Lo. Weaker than Uganda. lol. Poor comparison. China is stronger than Uganda. Chin a is weaker than the USA. And cannot fight nato alone.
@@danielb7253 >> They would not be fighting NATO, but their neighbors that don’t like them and the U.S.
Explain one thing CCP has invented in the last 100 years to help mankind? Telephone? automobiles? Tanks? Political system comes from Karl Marx a German but the Soviets used first and Mao copied them. Always copying.
@@jaybee9269 I know but easier than type all of them as I will now. China would fight against India, USA, Japan, Australia, New Zealand, Taiwan, PHillipines. NO WAY the CCP can win. In their doctrine is smililar to the USA. Perpetual warfare "enemies are everywhere" usually in their own hometowns. LOL.
@@jaybee9269 What if those are nato countries??
Beautiful aircraft carrier
BEAUTIFUL ship 🥰
If one considers the failures, capabilities and deployment of the US navy's resources, one shouldn't worry China's ability to compete militarily with the USA. For one, the much vaunted Zumwalt destroyer project was an unmitigated disaster and was abandoned due to bad planning and failed trials. The US carriers are not anything to be concerned about either, as they spend more time being maintained than deployed. The F35 project is also a massive failure as Lloyd Austin just admitted that only 25% of the fleet is deployable. Hence Matt Gaets' comment that it's a $1.5 trillion paperweight!!! I don't think Iran, Russia or China see the US armed forces as anything to be concerned about. The US has truly become a paper tiger!!
I wouldn't go quite as far. The US can still do significant damage. But yes, China has much reason to be confident in their own abilities to defend themselves.
THE US NAVY
The US is superior in propaganda and psychological operations.
If Zumwalt is a failure because they only made 4 then half the Chinese fleet is also a failure.
On purpose that’s what people are missing. They want a weak America and their getting it. Soyboys and transvestites. No one will fight for a country they hate so China has a bigger problem than America in that regard.
- In December 2023, China gave a high-profile commendation to the Type 055 Nanchang ship. On January 7, 2024, it was learned from the communication published by the North Sea Fleet PLA, in May 2022, with the cooperation of three satellites, the Nanchang ship paralyzed the US Navy's Nimitz-class USS Lincoln aircraft carrier battle group through electronic warfare. (The U.S. Navy's 2nd Fleet, together with the U.S. 7th Fleet, are causing trouble around China, including: Ticonderoga-class cruisers, Arleigh Burke-class destroyers, early warning aircraft squadrons, reconnaissance aircraft squadrons, and SPY-4A shipborne long-range air search radars) The Nanchang ship opened its missile silo, full tracking aiming and locking, It is similar to putting a gun on the head of the US Navy aircraft carrier battle group. For 20 consecutive days, It single-handedly expelled the aircraft carrier fleet eastward and out of the "second island chain". The PLA Navy currently has 10 Type 055 guided missile destroyers, and another 2 are being built. At present, the US Navy does not have the ability to suppress and strike electronic warfare through satellites.
- on July 11 2023, An article in the US magazine "The War Zone" reported that US Navy intelligence confirmed that China's annual shipbuilding capacity is 232 times that of the United States, reaching 23.2 million tons, while the United States only has 100,000 tons.
- July 2023, Charles Q. Brown Jr. (U.S. top military commander-Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, former Chief of Staff of the U.S. Air Force):
It is difficult for us to parry against our main opponent. The US military's ability to defend and attack in the field of electromagnetic spectrum has been weakened due to decades of decline. As a result, the U.S. military appears vulnerable in high-tech warfare, especially in Electronic warfare.
- The USS Carl Vinson aircraft carrier battle group is equipped with the most powerful carrier-based air wing in the US military. The electronic warfare capabilities of its VAQ-136 electronic warfare squadron are nearly twice as strong as other wings, it also makes the USS Carl Vinson aircraft carrier battle group in the most advanced position in the US Navy in terms of electronic warfare capability. Recently, in the South China Sea, it ended in a major defeat in an electronic warfare showdown with Chinese electronic warfare aircraft.
Afterwards, 21 December 2023 (Refer to the time of the first paragraph), it was confirmed through the official website of the U.S. Naval Institute confirmed that commander officer of Electronic Attack Squadron (VAQ) 136, Cmdr. William Coulter was relieved due to “a loss of confidence in his ability to command.”
- In March 2024, the USS Theodore Roosevelt aircraft carrier battle group came to the South China Sea for activities. When it learned that the PLA Navy had rushed into the Western Pacific toward Hawaii, the United States, to conduct 'long-range anti-submarine drills', the USS Theodore Roosevelt aircraft carrier battle group immediately turned around and fled the South China Sea.
Now, China have hypersonic nuclear missile technology, but the U.S. military lacks hypersonic missiles technology, so it does not have the ability to intercept hypersonic nuclear missiles, and can only be passively beaten.
About the YJ-21 hypersonic anti-ship missile of the Chinese Navy: Its flight speed can exceed Mach 6 and can exceed Mach 10 in the final stage. Its flight trajectory is very elusive and its defense penetration capability is very powerful.
China is currently the only country in the world that has the ability to intercept hypersonic missiles, the current interception success rate is 100%.
The United States lacks hypersonic missile technology. Without considering the insufficiency of the shipborne anti-missile system's ability to calculate changing trajectories in real time when facing an incoming Mach 10 hypersonic missile, just talking about the speed of the anti-missile missile itself, it cannot catch up with missiles flying at hypersonic speeds of Mach 6-10.
On July 2, 2023, U.S. Pacific Fleet Commander Adm. Samuel Paparo: Within a range of 3,000 kilometers, the Chinese Rocket Force DF-21 hypersonic missile can destroy U.S. aircraft carriers. If you don't worry about Dongfeng hypersonic missiles, you are a fool!
In February 2023, the PLA successfully test-fired the Dongfeng-27 land-based hypersonic anti-ship missile. According to the evaluation of the US military, the average speed of this missile reaches Mach 8.6 (sea level standard) and the maximum attack distance is about 9,000 kilometers (a nuclear warhead weighing about 0.8 tons), and it can already directly attack the U.S. military base in Hawaii off the coast of China (60,000 U.S. troops, Pearl Harbor Naval Base, U.S. Pacific Command, Pacific Fleet Command, Pacific The headquarters of Fleet Marine Corps Command, Pacific Army Command and Pacific Air Force Command.), within the so-called "third island chain", the US military has no safety at all.
The US military lags behind the PLA in areas such as missiles, radar, warships, space weapons, warplanes, UAV, UAV aircraft carrier, microwave weapons, laser weapon, electronic warfare weapons...
The quality of U.S. Navy crews has also seriously declined. The U.S. military is still short of 7,000 sailors recruited in 2023. U.S. Navy can't recruit even if U.S. Navy lower the standards, and take into account the lack of training time caused by the aging of warships. Do you still dare to say that the quality of the U.S. Navy is world-class?
On April 17, 2024, Secretary of the Air Force Frank Kendall admitted in the U.S. House of Representatives that only 29% (less than one third) of F35 fighters had combat capability.
Weakness and ignorance are not obstacles to survival, but arrogance is. - 'The Three-body Problem'
good comment make my cerebrum spin
Most of the information is specially marked with information sources such as time and people for those who want to see the truth to verify.
very imformative.some we already knew. like admitting 29% percent of f 35 has combat capa ilty and we knew type 55 destroyer single handedly defeated US carrier battle group
The military power of most East Asian countries ranks among the best in the world. Now, unless the West can be as smart and diligent as East Asians, there will be no chance for the West to surpass East Asia.
The performance parameters of the newly announced J-35 stealth carrier-based aircraft by the PLA comprehensively crush the US military's F-35, which means that the combat power of the PLA's aircraft carrier comprehensively crushes the US military's aircraft carriers.
Bravo China ❤💪💪💪💪💪
Japan is being trained for carrier flight decks by Americans plus the planes were bought from America until their stealth beast is ready.
Stealth beast ... good luck with that ~!! 😂😂😂😂😂
Just like taking off from ski jump carrier reduces the max load of an aircraft, vertical launch is even worse. The “stealth beast” can launch vertically from small carrier or use short take off without catapult or ski jump, but that would severely limit its takeoff weight.
Fujian great big technology carrier china. Very powerfully navy submarines
Yep "Definitely"
Wonderful accomplishment. I bet her crew are so proud. I hope they know that they are all "Plank Owners" now. I hope I get the chance to see her one day.
The Type 004 aircraft carrier will be nuclear powered. It has reportedly been under construction since 2017. Like the Fujian, the Type 004 will carry both J-15 and J-35 aircraft.
Type 004 being nuclear has not been confirmed yet.
@@gelinrefira too complicated for the ccp too copy. USA USA has 11!
@@danielb7253where did US copy aircraft carrier from?
@@yuguan6013 not the Qing dynasty for sure
@@danielb7253 so still copy. 😎
In the past, there were many problems in the international technical research related to electromagnetic catapult that have not been discovered or solved. The research team of PLA in China has discovered and solved these problems, and then launched a more mature and advanced small integrated intelligent power management system. In fact, in the field of power management technology, China has long been in a leading position in the world.
China has the only maglev track train in the world that has been put into commercial operation for 25 years, and its top speed reached 430 kilometers per hour 25 years ago.
According to the relevant information of the stealth fighter J35 released by the PLA, its performance data is significantly better than that of the F35, which means that there is an essential difference in the combat capabilities between Chinese and American aircraft carriers.
Very proud of Fujian aircraft carrier named after the southern province where my parents came from.
more fujian! this is the latest. no one else covering it. plus west is biased. probably second best carrier in the world atm. lets see how it goes.
the best PLAN analyst on youtube! thank you for your content!
great vid as usual, never get bored with this channel.
One thing that needs to be mentioned is that it may take another year or so to be commissioned, and then probably at least another year to be ready for combat deployment.
Longer than that.
The Great China ❤️ Taiwan forever .
Because , genetically speaking , China & Taiwan is absolutely one-blood one heart .
Get sick of seeing the Fujian??? NEVER!!! China has copied one outstanding Soviet/Russian technique in building their warships, they both build beautifully proportioned and elegant ships. I mean, just look at that Sovremenny Class destroyer, gorgeous! Great video ENI, thanks mate!
China has the right to defend itself.
Well duhhhhhh
So does Taiwan!
@@Porter92 no worry, China does it for Taiwan too 😄
@@Porter92 So do the Malvinas Islands, Cuba (Guantanamo), the Barbade Island, and also the Pacific Islands, the Virgin Islands, Puerto Rico, and so on.
And so does the Philippines
China is developing a more advanced nuclear propulsion, there is no point in matching the US by developing existing nuclear power.
Having steam turbines means the steam generation can easily be replaced with nuclear units. That is, if actually required, or incorporate into future carriers.
Congrats. It’sa carrier. It’sa big accomplishment, but don’t get carried away.
Another good update, thanks
It has a smokestack, how stunning!
(Former carrier sailor)
It uses gas turbines obviously it will have smoke
@@kanestalin7246 You're right, a smokestack is for smoke. My point is the ship is not a nuke. For a carrier, that's a serious disadvantage.
...and Gaza is belongs to iSrael
It is sad that China is forced to waste so much resources to defend itself agaist the US fleet patrolling the South China sea.
China learned its lesson from its Century of Humiliation when it was weak and destitute following the Opium Wars, Western powers invaded China and grabbed anything they could lay their hands on.
It isn't a waste of resources when it comes to defense, except to throw money to the Military Industrial Complex in the so-called Western democracy.
@@user-ne6xw1sv4u I was meaning it's sad that China is the target of US aggression and has to divert a lot of it's resources in defending it's coast line from a navy that shouldn't be there threatening it.
Never heard that its international waters? So everyone can sail in the South China.
You have no knowledge of China's coastal defense capabilities.
Great ship, the narrator makes too many excuses and is awful to listen to.
Very interesting. I would, however, point out that take off from a ski jump is different than catapult whether steam or EMALS. You can practice on land but it's not the same as when at sea. It will take the naval aviators some practice to nail this skill.
China has built catapults on land for training
Tell us about the 2 2nd-hand carriers of little-D-boi's country
@@llkk290 Like I said, practicing with catapults on land is not like on the open sea with the pitching of the ocean, unpredictable winds and the ocean’s basic lack of mercy.
Yamamoto’s Combined Fleet has 8 carriers to conduct decisive battle in 1941. Doctrine and martial aggression matters. Last year China’s shipbuilding industry produced 50% of global output or 42 million tons. By 1945 year end, US merchant fleet totals 39 million tons - excluding 3 million ton losses prior. China can produce entire US war effort in a year. Yet people are over excited about the first real carrier. Sad
Japanese shipbuilding in WW2 was hamstrung by the shortage of raw materials and fuel. The US and Allies used extensive submarine campaign in the Pacific and Indian Oceans to decimate Japanese merchant shippings. The US on the other hand had no shortage of raw materials and fuel at all because North America was a continent rich in natural resources. So it is never about how much the Chinese shipyards can build in peace time. At war, the critical factor on shipbuilding is how to keep raw materials and fuel reaching the shipyards.
equals to a strengthened kitty hawk
CCTV photographers' skill is so poor that they always make the ships look so small😂
Tell us about 🏳️1962🏳️
@@taiwanstillisntacountry wat?
haha ， maybe they doing this with reasons , just like lot media said the weight is not correct
@kevinyu-it8lc.indian toilet😂😂😂
Japanese Maritime Self Defense Force has the best photographers for Chinese ships.
The Fujisn is little more than an expensive experiment with next to no use. Because of its limited propulsion technology, it's vestumated not to have an at sea capability longer than a couple weeks at most of sustained operations. Resupply at sea is limited and difficult. This means that the Fujisn can operate only mostly within the first island chains and unlikely to venture beyond the second island chains.
The consequence is that the Fujisn would be highly vulnerable in any conflict. Aircraft carriers need to operate far at sea to maneuver at speed in the wide expanse of an ocean for defense. Instead, the Fujian is forced to operate even within range of well placed land based artillery band missile batteries.
And the other aircraft carriers are even more worthless.
The Lianong is little more than a training ship limited by its design and the Shandong's sea trials and training shows how inexperienced China is at carrier operations and that's besides the fact that both are even more limited than the Fujian due to same limitations of conventional propulsion and fuel consumption.
Maybe the Type 004 will be better designed and built but today's carriers have serious problems
The spirit of Admiral Zheng Ho is emerging
😂😂😂😂😂
That’s unintentionally funny since he was a eunuch.😂
While it is true the US is a war culture with massive military assets, the big question really is how long has it been since America trained to fight in a peer-to-peer War? 1945.
Well, we call your lot “near peer” adversaries. The Imperial Japanese Navy was impressive…but not really a “peer” after the Battle of Midway, though. It was just a matter of time and fortitude as Yamamoto knew very well. And only free countries develop truly new things in the long term…
1945 you mean when America was saving China from Japan. Ask the same question about China. Better or for worse America fight some war or conflict somewhere almost all the time.
@@rattlertech >> That’s why we should change “Department of Defense” back to “War Department.” Let’s be honest.
Sea Dragon arise.
China should practice freedom of navigation In Washington coat ,coat of Mexico, Hawaii, Alaska coast with Fujian on the lead.
❤
you can't skip generational catapults and have any experience, as it shows in the similar version catapult of US carriers-
Being steam powered makes it dependent on a fuel source close by which will limit then to the shore line, hardly a blue water navy-
The Us has been doing flight op for over 100 years, the Chinese are not going to learn this over night or the next 10 years, then they'll still be behind
Well, at least the damn thing floats. Time will tell about the rest.
Japan has a history of operating aircraft carriers until 1946 . . . only matter of adapting to present day technology & naval doctrines . . .
They don't have modern time experience even on jet engine fighters landing taking off let along Japan is only a vessel state of US which they will always under leash and never allowed to develop such tech.
China has no experience with operating these type of vesels in a actual hot war, or fighting any modern war for that matter.
Modi just announced that India would make a nuclear aircraft carrier to make Chinese carriers embarrassed. It's India. So, better take it seriously.
China has never seen India as a dish.，China's goal is to catch up with the US
Awww… Modi… spare us the joke… they couldn’t even get modern planes on their carrier, and now thinking of making another?
China is already laying the keel for its first nuclear aircraft carrier and a second is said to be nearing start up. If Modi is thinking of a nuclear carrier for India, he needs to put it into action not words to be true. Further, India has to buy its aircraft for its carriers because it has no indigenous aircraft carrier fighters---yet, China does.
I just feel ridiculous. It's not awkward at all. You will see Indian nuclear powered aircraft carriers launched in 30 years.
India's mouth is the best in the universe. I can't help but admire it.
China is also building two aircraft carriers at the same time. They call it 004 and 005
🏳️1962🏳️
She looks pretty good…in a Gomer sort of way.
It’s one thing to say you have these capabilities…..all unproven. It’s another to actually show those capabilities. Your electromagnetic catapult system is unproven.
Ask yourself why there is Chinese propaganda in English about the carrier before trying to rationalize the claims they're making.
So is the Ford.
So are the 2 UK carriers.
And the 2 2nd-hand carriers of little-D-boi's country.
Did you know the sewage system of the Ford still isnt working properly?
Jai Behind 🚽
Next, let's see it launch planes from its catapults!
People should not get over excited just because the Chinese are building many ships. We, as external observers only know the external appearance of these ships and not if the systems are equipment actually works as claimed.
One should remember that on paper Italy during WW2 had a formidable navy but it's incompetent crew meant that it was useless. The same could be true of Chinese crew who have no experience in naval operations 🤔
You jealous
kamu boleh mencobanya.
This is your last hope
Big deal! If one considers the failures, capabilitie and deployment of the US navy's resources, one shouldn't worry China's ability to compete. For one, the much vaunted Zumwalt destroyer project was an unmitigated disaster and was abandoned due to bad planning and failed trials. The US carriers are not anything to be concerned about either, as they spend more time being maintained than deployed. The F35 project is also a massive failure as Lloyd Austin just admitted that only 25% of the fleet is deployable. Hence Matt Gaets' comment that it's a $1.5 trillion paperweight!!! I don't think Iran, Russia or China see the US armed forces as anything to be concerned about. The US has truly become a paper tiger!!
Funny. In the past days you have ridiculed China's lack of technology in the Navy, now you turn to embraced empiricist nonsense. Do you really think that the people who can design and operate such a huge thing can't even push the right button in the right place? Answering something like 'the Chinese have no experience so they are doomed to do nothing' is an insult to my brain.
Serious admiration of the new Chinese ship and Chinese ability....the next ships can only be better, probably with nuclear power and with tech not commonly heard of.....one has to seriously admire the evolution of Chinese ship building and the purposeful steps taken....from ski jump to a flat deck though with a diesel engine,(not that a nuclear engine is beyond them it would happen in a couple of years) but the ability to construct and develop METHODS TO OPERATE these ships for commercial and strategic purposes is also key....the Indian might use methods on the aircraft carrier similar to the British but he has his own personal tweaks that allow him operate with success....and these personal tweaks(the Chinese characteristics) is probably why china built this.
congratulations ,always bigger 🎉🎉🎉🎉
核动力技术是有的。今年会开建一艘核动力集装箱货轮，先测试技术可行性。004会同003一样采用普通动力，中国目前只需要近海防御，不需要蓝海海军装备。
will look good at the bottom of the sea to
They don't want to meet the F35 below if not someone will scream it's not a professional engagement, too near and a dangerous maneuver.
Only if on top of you.
Ok keyboard warrior
или он может затонуть, как это делают обычные китайские бумажные кораблики.
谁知道呢
Through you, I know that your country is made of paper.
clown
It will be very interesting to see this ship conducting patrols. Also, to see it displaying its full potential.
Isn't the Fujian a more shittier version of the Gerald R. Ford?
It’s not that close.
@@jaybee9269 WDYM?
Time will tell! Wait another 10 years and see what happens. Chinese have many years of history, ten years is very short time to see what will happen. (Keep an open mind)
I think it was a big mistake to go non-nuclear propulsion
A great step forward for humankind.
A great little video excellent news from the mighty Chinese navy a great ship.
Yep definitely "Mighty"
AMAZING CHINA
Hey I was wondering whether you would pit your videos up on Bilibili. The PLA hype there is incredible.
Has this Chinese super weapon launch a jet yet? No. Nuclear power and still pursue electric catapults. Going to take 3000 sailors peddling bike generators.
100 years of experience , WW2 veterans are fast dying out and afghanistan chief loyd austin is suffering from prostate cancer …. It’s a wishy washy world when it comes to experience. 😂😅😂
A FEW DRONES WILL DISABLE THE SUPER CARRIER.
@Eurasia Naval Insight. Thank you for such an informative and professional video.
Agree with you that to base capabilities based on past experience is irrelevant. What is relevant is the current technology employed in the hardware; e.g. I reckon China is way ahead of UK.
Also agree that China 🇨🇳 should take well-thought incremental progress instead of reckless quantum leap.
Always enjoy your videos and look forward to more soon.
Keep it up 👍👍🛳️
*"Why isn't the Fujian nuclear powered?"*
US: "Because Chinese can't figure how to do that"
China: "Uh, we had NUCLEAR submarines since 1970s, u figure out why"
It isnt nuclear powered because China has no desire to go to the other side of the world to bomb countries that dont worship them
@@kanestalin7246 100% spot on
Фуцзянь 🇨🇳❤️🇨🇳❤️🇨🇳❤️🇨🇳❤️🇨🇳❤️
Whatever it is, Fujian is giving pentagon sleepless night.
Shes a sharp, clean looking vessel, no doubt about that
The next chinese carrier will be nuclear according to their learning curve so far.
Another excellent video. Keep up the great work. Love to see it !
As far as I'm interested, an electric drive to the propeller shaft is used in the case of gas turbine engines on board, but in the case of steam turbines and Boilers, a direct connection