Mike Tyson vs. George Foreman: Who wins in their primes? Mayweather Boxing Club predicts
Vložit
- čas přidán 3. 01. 2018
- Proudly sponsored by EpiPeppi.com. Check them out and get yours today! carefast.com/epi-peppi
Jeff Mayweather asks some of the guys inside the Mayweather Boxing Club who would win between Mike Tyson and George Foreman if they fought in their primes
For sponsorship opportunities, please contact Amer@laceuppromotions.com
MORE FROM THE MAYWEATHERS!
GET YOUR MAYWEATHER MERCHANDISE
proboxinginsider.com/store/
TONS MORE VIDEOS & NEWS
www.proboxinginsider.com
SUBSCRIBE NOW FOR MORE BOXING VIDEOS!
/ mayweatherboxingchannel
LET'S CONNECT! (If it isn't listed on here, it isn't a real account)
Jeff's Boxing Site ► www.ProBoxingInsider.com
Facebook ►
Jeff: / proboxinginsider
Twitter ►
Jeff: / jeffmayweather1
Pinterest ► / pbinsider - Sport
Lol Nate said prime Foreman didn't throw combos. He literally threw everything he had in his prime, he didn't start throwing 1-2s until his second career
it means he didnt do em smoothly throwing without timing was dumb like u
"It's suicide against Foreman if you're short and fight a swarming attacking style like Marciano or Frazier,"
- Cus D’Amato
@irish man frazier was faster and stronger and higher IQ.
@@azteka6103 Are you saying Frazier was faster than Mike or George?
@Legend of Awe Sheeet !!! that dude is a clown, if he cant come up with a counter he just copy and pastes exactly what you said back
@@cmoneytheman tyson would lose to george
@@zaipollizamabdulmalek5822 mental
I’m picking Gorge Foremen for this 🙏🏽
Tough call. People keep saying Mike Tyson is the same as Joe Frazier and while Frazier has the legendary will too fight, prime Tyson is much quicker with better footwork than Frazier so he could potentially land a lot more shot in than Frazier did.
@@MikeBrownLegend much better defense to whole different style dumb to compare them
@@MikeBrownLegend Exactly
@@cmoneytheman Reread what we wrote and make sure you understand what we're saying. Considering you're response it seems really weird that you didn't quite understand what we were saying.
@@cmoneytheman Who's talking about anyone called Tom? I don't understand your comment.
It took a very special performance by Ali to stop Foreman ..... Ali himself was special , so special person with special performance stopped George !
And the referee gave Foreman a very fast count that was like a 7 second count. Foreman could have continued although he would have lost a decision. George didn't know about controlling his tempo at this point in his career, so he would go all out and get completely exhausted. This played into Ali's strengths of precise punching and stamina.
@@maxv6837 Foreman was very good but Ali was street smart , he used his brains instead of getting carried away
@@russelindia Ali grew up in a middle class two parent home. He was not street smart. He did have a very high boxing IQ though.
@@maxv6837 count again man, try it whit your phone, is 10 not 7.
Notice how Ali didn't give George a rematch. Ali fooled him once but knew he had no other tricks to play on foreman
Big George!
loses i agree
Nah formen wins this
Tyson even said he didnt want to fight that animal reffering to George
@@poolplexer the young george def was weaker then his old ver u can see he had no real def in his young days
dwight fought like a better def version of dwight used head movement and angles so if joe used that same style he could have put down george
followers got mutiple points which was shown to be flawed
george height is advantage
pushes means he dominates
his power was to much
uppercuts and iabs keep take a person out fast
swammers lose fast
dwight showed if joe used the same defense he would have beat george cause I told u young george couldnt take damage even close to the old ver
and dwight was a better swammer then joe didnt used his block good u have to use angles to make George wide punches miss and he made him miss often and dwight blocked often joe didnt show these same def skills
they never bring up dwight and act like the match never happened he showed that dumb flawed quote of all swammers lose is crap and folks still say it I dont know why
dwight only lost cause he was tired he did better then joes both matches
dwight only lost cause he was tired he was winning rounds
george said for dwight
he said he had trouble hittin him
even tho george was taller then him and used the jabs another advantage yall say works for george
dwight showed height and coming in like joe did didnt matter
tom showed punches wide like tyson and hitting quick punches would show a effect on George
mike fought Smith who was slow and strong like George u weird people will say but he wasnt strong as George why do that matter as if if he had been as strong he would land no cause he was still slow
why is it everytime we make the point of who mike fought that was comparable to George like smith and trever who did pushes yall say it's wrong when it's on video showing trever did pushes and smith was slow and strong like George
but when yall say the blind quote of mike was like joe even tho they fought nothing alike that's right its hypocritical
why would mike who had the best defense of all time in hw lose to George and mike fought smith who was strong but faster then frank and frank was almost as slow as George and almost as strong and neither one could hit mike much so why would George
another proof is berbick which I exposed George wouldnt be able to keep doing that to keep space berbick abused it keep getting countered George was slower then berbick
dwight style like joe but better defense
ali and jim fast punchers and defense
frank real slow and almost as George
smith slow and strong
all people who show George would lose to mike if if nothing like I told u nobody to name who show George would even hit mike often
And no it wouldn't be anything like a joe or ken match cause mine fought nothing like them so why say that makes no sense see how you shouldn't repeat silly quotes you read like the man told you he was nothing like Joe so why keep saying it its on video all you have to do is watch
So no it he wouldnt win try watching these matches why would you even say a person like george would win is odd
I personally believe the older George foreman would've took Mike Tyson into deeper waters then the young George foreman!
I Think the same thing. Younger George would gas out if he didn't put him away within 7 rounds or so but older George was more resoursfull as Well as more durable
bro stfu 😭😭😭, u trynna sound different, sorry but thats just dumb!!
All anyone has to do is to watch the Foreman vs Holyfield fight. Foreman came very close to winning, but he was old when that happened. What would have happened if Foreman would've been in his prime? It would've been sleep time for Holyfield. And, just think, Holyfield DID beat Tyson.
@@cmoneytheman Props and respect to both. I think they're great so was Muhammad and Fraizer was a badass too.
I'm taking George because of his length and power, especially in the jab. But I could see a case for both guys. One thing for sure, this fight would not go the distance.
What about prime mikes unbelievable speed and boxing skills as a young fighter? Foreman was powerful but not quick by any means. It takes more than brute strengh to win a fight didnt goku teach you anything lol?
@@Djuane yeah, like I said, I could see a case for both because Tyson was an unbelievable athlete but he is only really dangerous coming forward in the beginning of fights, then he slows down quite a bit. I think Foreman would press with that size and constant power shots. Tyson can't fight going backwards but he maybe could make it inside fight and hurt George.
@@Djuane I personally have my money on Big George look at the frazer fight for an example. Frazer was fast not as fast as tyson but Georges style just counters Tyson. He would frame off his body and push him around mike can't fight even with his speed off balance.
@@Djuaneprime foreman wasn't as slow as people make him out to be. Mike slips a hook thinking its coming high then it lands low. Speed wont bail mike out of that
@John yeah but he still has a puncher's chance to win. There is really no parallel to his explosiveness that I've ever seen from a Heavyweight
I don’t even bother debating this topic. George Foreman beats Tyson every day of the week and twice on Sundays, and I’m 99.8% certain of this. Even Cus D’amotto believed that there was no way Tyson could beat Foreman. Tyson couldn’t bully Foreman, and Tyson being almost a carbon copy of Frazier would undoubtedly meet the same fate Smokin’ Joe did each time he fought Foreman. Tyson wanted nothing you do with Foreman, and that was very smart in his part.
Absolutely ! Styles Make Fights. A short-armed Swarmer/Infighter will only lose to a Rangy and Powerful Bruiser in George Foreman
The Fact that Cus mentioned this Fact was enough to avoid a Fight with George Foreman, and i mean the Old George.
@@cmoneytheman no one says that
@@cmoneytheman put a grappler and a boxer with equal skills in a fight and see just how styles win fights
@@cmoneytheman bruh what you said means nothing like what, I said equal skill cause that makes it the most fair and just shows that styles change fights, grapplers beat boxers if they're equal skill 90% of the time
George Foreman in his prime was so powerful and so angry but he was always calm 💯
I just can't see Foreman getting knocked out by 1 punch, and Tyson wasn't known for his long distance fights. George's head was a standing target in the Hollyfield fight, and Evander said in an interview, he could have gotten knocked out by George in the 10th, if he hadn't been smart and not trade with George later on in the closing rounds. I pick George in this one, in my opinion he is the GOAT.
u pick George to lose huh picking George cause other dummies do he would lose
Marjan Sarec ...No one ever knocked out George Foreman with one punch. Tyson wouldn't have done it, either!
I'd rather see 90's George vs prime Tyson, 90's George had all the grit and power of young George- but with more technique and strategy... Big George also was considerably taller and heavier than Tyson too... Foreman some took BOMBS from Holyfield and kept standing, so I'm not seeing Tyson ending the fight by KO... I see Foreman gridding out a KO in the later rounds... Foreman fought the some of the best heavyweights of all time, so I don't think Tyson will intimidate Foreman. Tyson had speed, athleticism, and great technique- where as Foreman had size, strategy, mental toughness, and experience- got to go with Big George!
90's George was literally told by Ali to not fight Mike Tyson.
@Graham James not doubting you, but would love to see evidence of that. There is video evidence of Foreman saying he wanted nothing to do with Tyson as well as Ali telling him to avoid him.
@@dalehammers4425 There's also video evidence of Foreman calling out Mike Tyson on National TV in 1989 while Mike was still undisputed champion.
George hung in there with a undisputed undefeated evander holyfield. I dont think george would have done better against a young mike tyson in 1989 it would have been bad and he would have left that ring busted up. Prime for prime my money is on george foreman
@@dalehammers4425 George wanted to fight him. Check out the David Letterman interview after he KO’s Cooney.
I could listen to Jeff all day. So funny.
George said himself, he was glad he didnt fight tyson, furthermore ali warned him off tyson for a reason. We talking about tyson in his prime with cus in his corner, not tyson when he was neglecting his training and doing drugs and mentally in the wrong place be real. Tysons style the peekaboo would have got foremen. And i love foremen, if they was to fight after foremen wins 💯 but in their primes noone beating tyson, watch tyson punching the bag dude throws like 6 punches in 1second with power in both hands and good foot work
the young george def was weaker then his old ver u can see he had no real def in his young days
dwight fought like a better def version of dwight used head movement and angles so if joe used that same style he could have put down george
followers got mutiple points which was shown to be flawed
george height is advantage
pushes means he dominates
his power was to much
uppercuts and iabs keep take a person out fast
swammers lose fast
dwight showed if joe used the same defense he would have beat george cause I told u young george couldnt take damage even close to the old ver
and dwight was a better swammer then joe didnt used his block good u have to use angles to make George wide punches miss and he made him miss often and dwight blocked often joe didnt show these same def skills
they never bring up dwight and act like the match never happened he showed that dumb flawed quote of all swammers lose is crap and folks still say it I dont know why
dwight only lost cause he was tired he did better then joes both matches
dwight only lost cause he was tired he was winning rounds
george said for dwight
he said he had trouble hittin him
even tho george was taller then him and used the jabs another advantage yall say works for george
dwight showed height and coming in like joe did didnt matter
tom showed punches wide like tyson and hitting quick punches would show a effect on George
mike fought Smith who was slow and strong like George these weird people will say but he wasnt strong as George why does that matter as if if he had been as strong he would land no cause he was still slow
why is it everytime we make the point of who mike fought that was comparable to George like smith and trever who did pushes they say it's wrong when it's on video showing trever did pushes and smith was slow and strong like George
but when they say the blind quote of mike was like joe even though they fought nothing alike its ok to use
why would mike who had the best defense of all time in hw lose to George and mike fought smith who was strong but faster then frank and frank was almost as slow as George and almost as strong and neither one could hit mike much so why would George
another proof is berbick which I exposed George wouldnt be able to keep doing that to keep space berbick abused it keep getting countered George was slower then berbick
dwight style like joe but better defense
ali and jim fast punchers and defense
frank real slow and almost as George
smith slow and strong
And no it wouldn't be anything like a joe match cause mike fought nothing like them so why say it these people have been saying that yet vid shows that to be wrong years ago
Young Foreman wrecks Tyson.
@@periechontology in ur dreams. foreman coulnt even beat jimmy young
Almost everything in this sentence id wrong. Except for the fact foreman lied about not wanting tyson when hes now a humble old man, tyson ducked foreman and foreman wanted tysons head in the 90s
Agreed 👍🏼 well put!
Foreman had much power but Tyson is too fast for that slow power foreman punch. Lets see Mayweather Sr vs Mike Tyson because Mayweather Sr like to show people that he still got it.
the young george def was weaker then his old ver u can see he had no real def in his young days
dwight fought like a better def version of dwight used head movement and angles so if joe used that same style he could have put down george
followers got mutiple points which was shown to be flawed
george height is advantage
pushes means he dominates
his power was to much
uppercuts and iabs keep take a person out fast
swammers lose fast
dwight showed if joe used the same defense he would have beat george cause I told u young george couldnt take damage even close to the old ver
and dwight was a better swammer then joe didnt used his block good u have to use angles to make George wide punches miss and he made him miss often and dwight blocked often joe didnt show these same def skills
they never bring up dwight and act like the match never happened he showed that dumb flawed quote of all swammers lose is crap and folks still say it I dont know why
dwight only lost cause he was tired he did better then joes both matches
dwight only lost cause he was tired he was winning rounds
george said for dwight
he said he had trouble hittin him
even tho george was taller then him and used the jabs another advantage yall say works for george
dwight showed height and coming in like joe did didnt matter
tom showed punches wide like tyson and hitting quick punches would show a effect on George
mike fought Smith who was slow and strong like George u weird people will say but he wasnt strong as George why do that matter as if if he had been as strong he would land no cause he was still slow
why is it everytime we make the point of who mike fought that was comparable to George like smith and trever who did pushes they say it's wrong when it's on video showing trever did pushes and smith was slow and strong like George
why would mike who had the best defense of all time for his style in hw lose to George and mike fought smith who was strong but faster then frank and frank was almost as slow as George and almost as strong and neither one could hit mike much so why would George
another proof is berbick which I exposed George wouldnt be able to keep doing that to keep space berbick abused it keep getting countered George was slower then berbick
dwight style like joe but better defense
ali and jim fast punchers and defense
frank real slow and almost as George
smith slow and strong
You couldnt trade shots with big george. Id put my money on foreman
Yes you could. Lyle almost took him out that way, and Lyle was nowhere near as fast or accurate as Tyson.
@@michaeltrumph121 yup these followers so dumb they dont watch matches just repeat dumb stuff saying how cause George beat joe he could beat mine they had way different style and skills
and mike wouldnt get hit much
@@cmoneytheman wouldnt get hit much? Mike was getting touched up in his prime with some hard shots from razor ruddock and he was getting stunned because of how hard a puncher he was. Now george forrman is known as one of the heaviest punchers ever.
@@Djuane
_Mike was getting touched up in his prime with some hard shots from razor ruddock_
Mike's prime was 87-88. After he fired Rooney, his skillset gradually degraded.
He also lost focus and did not train hard anymore.
He was completely unprepared for the Douglas fight. Got beat, then realized he needed to train again. Did that, but he still wasn't the same without Rooney.
The 90-91 Tyson that fought Ruddock was not as good as the 87-88 Tyson. That version stops Ruddock in 5 rounds max.
_Now george forrman is known as one of the heaviest punchers ever_
That's irrelevant if he won't be able to land.
@@michaeltrumph121 what a reach, you’re telling me tyson only had 2 years in his prime? Thats seriously a joke because he was top of boxing gaming in 91. Saying he wasnt prime because he was not under cus anymore is not a good argument. Hes still mike tyson
I’d say Mikes speed, combos and most overlooked headmovment would have been the deciding factor. I know Joe Frazier moved his head but it was nothing compared to Mikes. Love Big George also though 👊❤️
yea nothing compared to mike different style and skills
@@cmoneytheman 🤡
@@cmoneytheman You're under every comment lmao you weirdo Tyson fanboy
@@jwjxhdjxsns @You're under every comment lmao you Tyson fanboy
You're under every comment lmao you Tyson fanboy
I love Samuel Peter!
Original Nigerian nightmare
Styles Make Fights !!! George would've always have his Number!!! A short-armed Swarmer/Mauler(like Mike Tyson,Joe Frazier,David Tua) will constantly lose to a Very Powerful,Tall Bruiser/Slugger with Overwhelming Reach on you like George Foreman or Sonny Liston. Even a Rooney-Trained Prime Mike Tyson Cannot Beat an old George Foreman, he wouldve got the Joe
Frazier-Jamaica-Treatment.
George Foreman uses the most important Punch, the Jab , not (only) as a Rangefinder but more Like a Ramrod/Poleaxe-Jab to hurt the shorter Boxer, who desperately tries to get inside and continues to Assault you with his Crushing Uppercuts and Hooks. A Guy like David Tua, who never got knocked out in any professional match would lose dramatically against rangy Boxer-Sluggers like Sonny Liston and Big George. David Tua lost to the Great Cuban Felix Savón( great Left Jab and One of Strongest Straight Right Hands Ever) by Knockout. Or Sonny Liston knocked the Undisputed Champ Patterson in the first Round in their 2 Fights out.
Even Though Frazier gave Ali Hell and Trouble all the Time, Ali beat Foreman, but Foreman completely dominated and manhandled Joe Frazier.
Just because A beats B, and B beats C, does not necessarily mean that C gets beaten by A
Mike wasnt there to dance around........No way foreman could beat him.....foreman cant catch him
the young george def was weaker then his old ver u can see he had no real def in his young days
dwight fought like a better def version of dwight used head movement and angles so if joe used that same style he could have put down george
followers got mutiple points which was shown to be flawed
george height is advantage
pushes means he dominates
his power was to much
uppercuts and iabs keep take a person out fast
swammers lose fast
dwight showed if joe used the same defense he would have beat george cause I told u young george couldnt take damage even close to the old ver
and dwight was a better swammer then joe didnt used his block good u have to use angles to make George wide punches miss and he made him miss often and dwight blocked often joe didnt show these same def skills
they never bring up dwight and act like the match never happened he showed that dumb flawed quote of all swammers lose is crap and folks still say it I dont know why
dwight only lost cause he was tired he did better then joes both matches
dwight only lost cause he was tired he was winning rounds
george said for dwight
he said he had trouble hittin him
even tho george was taller then him and used the jabs another advantage they say works for george
dwight showed height and coming in like joe did didnt matter
tom showed punches wide like tyson and hitting quick punches would show a effect on George
mike fought Smith who was slow and strong like George weird people will say but he wasnt strong as George why do that matter as if if he had been as strong he would land no cause he was still slow
why is it everytime we make the point of who mike fought that was comparable to George like smith and trever who did pushes yall say it's wrong when it's on video showing trever did pushes and smith was slow and strong like George
but when they say the blind quote of mike was like joe even tho they fought nothing alike that's right its hypocritical
why would mike who had the best defense of all time in hw lose to George and mike fought smith who was strong but faster then frank and frank was almost as slow as George and almost as strong and neither one could hit mike much so why would George
another proof is berbick which I exposed George wouldnt be able to keep doing that to keep space berbick abused it keep getting countered George was slower then berbick
dwight style like joe but better defense
ali and jim fast punchers and defense
frank real slow and almost as George
smith slow and strong
Mike had trouble with rangy fighters who fought from range who had lateral movement who had good hand speed and who had good defense
They even say in the trever match which I described thats not the way to fight him he came nonstop forward
Wasnt that the exact same way george fought? He didn't fight off the jab or use any lateral movement while fighting from distance george would lose off of the breakdown and even said by the commentaries like I said
Mike wasnt joe his weaknesses wasnt a uppercut that he just kept running through especially not a slow easy to read one from a person as slow as george it was like I said a person who fought from range and who used good lateral movement
Nobody has anybody George fought that can compare to mike so how is it they said he would beat Mike where does it come from its based off of nothing which is odd
I just saw again the movie "When We Were Kings", and Ali was able to figure out Foreman, but those other guys that just went head to head and that's the way Tyson fought, you just can't beat a young 24 year old Foremen that way. And Tyson got knocked out by Buster Douglas. Part of Tyson's mystic is people were terrified of him even before they got in the ring. IN their minds they already lost even before the fight started. I remember that fight and Michal Spinks looked like he was about to cry even during introductions, like he was about to face Jason from Halloween, that's how scared he looked! Foreman would not be afraid.
Whenever there is a boxing comparison........ Ali vs , Foreman vs, Joe Louis vs, Klitschko vs, Fury vs, Marciano vs....... has anyone ever noticed the Gold standard boxer that they are all hypothetically compared to????? The reference point fighter makes it apparent who the greatest of all time is.
I really think foreman and mayweather have slightly similar careers from the standpoint of young floyd was more aggressive and wild while older floyd was more smart and technical same thing with foreman his younger days he would just gas himself out trying to land a KO while in his older days where he beat michael moore he was a more smarter boxer so the point im trying to make is that older foreman has a BETTER chance to beat tyson than younger foreman 💯 70s foreman would just tire himself out and mike probably would’ve gotten him outta there by the 7th or 8th round
Tough one. Leaning Foreman but I have to admit at 21 Tyson was Fast and George could be wobbled if he didnt get Mike 1st.
I really really think it would come down to who landed a hay maker 1st.
The only way George goes down is of you wear him down. And no way Tyson could wear him down. I'd give him 3 rounds
@@tavo.B mental
George better chin and more power. So Mike only has stamina on his side, and not by much. Foreman wins this
GEEEEOOOOORGE FOORRRREEEMAN
@@cmoneytheman George would destroy Mike
@@michaelcorvin951 mental
That last guy 🤣🤣
Both prime Tyson win but Old George VS Iron Mike from 95 to 97 is very hard to say
Man a lot of foreman’s. I took Iron Mike in his prime. Solid AF nasty combos that’ll knock out a rhino.
yea nobody should pick George no reason to he was to slow and easy to hit
@@cmoneytheman mike wouldn't have time to get close to george in his prime because george style was pushing away before they get close and hit them with his heavy blows
@@ruatsangapachuau3418 and pushing would put him right back to the range he liked to fight from dummy mike countered those who pushed him if u watched the matches
so stop saying dumb quotes u read dummy and George was slow he wouldnt land much dummy so yea Mike would have time sense he was a great counter puncher who was patient u idiot
see how saying dumb quotes u read makes u look real dumb George would have to have better speed and fight as a outboxer to beat mike idiot
@@cmoneytheman what quote are you saying mike was not that fast dummy george had reach advantage so he would put him out of range because george was way bigger than mike and he could move him around
@@ruatsangapachuau3418 multiple people had reaches and I already told u he would be pushing mike where he fought best at and he was slow wouldnt land much I said this already can u read and George was the same way dummy
he needs to not push why dont u get that it wouldnt work good stop sayin that it's a advantage for mike doin that moving him is bad George needs to box and not push stop trolling
Foreman ,hes got a better chin and hits harder
@@cmoneytheman George showed a far better chin against Holyfield than Tyson?! And yes he would hit, and with far more power
George's defense looked primitive but was technically effective for fighters like Tyson.
which people did George fight who was like mike
@@cmoneytheman no one exactly like Mike but style wise
Dwight Muhammad qawi
Bert cooper
Joe Frazier (twice)
@@cmoneytheman I'm pretty sure when Mike Tyson was first coming up into boxing every commentator was comparing him to Joe Frazier because of his style so you're wrong there
Qawi had a Bob and weave style which george specifically said he picked because he wanted to get ready for Mike tyson, so wrong again
Bert cooper also had a Bob and weave style it's just he had to adapt to a stick and move style when fighting george and when he did stand in front of george he got a severe beating every time, but I'll give you that he didn't fight in mike's style for the fight only in spurts
@@cmoneytheman I'm afraid this is an agree to disagree situation
@@cmoneytheman Joe Frazier lmao
Should of asked lennox vs big george. Lennox would of taken him down.
Easy george was to slow no defense
@@cmoneytheman yea I think lennox also but george could of hurt lennox
@@donkarlo7401 no cause george wouldnt land he was to slow and basic len would run though him
Tyson can win by decision, by using his head movement and footwork to stick and move, while evading Foreman’s punches. But if Mike thinks he can go in and and just knock Foreman out, or try to just pulverize him with combos, he’s wrong. It’ll be Joe Frazier/Ken Norton all over again.
the young george def was weaker then his old ver u can see he had no real def in his young days
dwight fought like a better def version of dwight used head movement and angles so if joe used that same style he could have put down george
followers got mutiple points which was shown to be flawed
george height is advantage
pushes means he dominates
his power was to much
uppercuts and iabs keep take a person out fast
swammers lose fast
dwight showed if joe used the same defense he would have beat george cause I told u young george couldnt take damage even close to the old ver
and dwight was a better swammer then joe didnt used his block good u have to use angles to make George wide punches miss and he made him miss often and dwight blocked often joe didnt show these same def skills
they never bring up dwight and act like the match never happened heshowed that dumb flawed quote of all swammers lose is crap and folks still say it I dont know why
dwight only lost cause he was tired he did better then joes both matches
dwight only lost cause he was tired he was winning rounds
george said for dwight
he said he had trouble hittin him
even tho george was taller then him and used the jabs another advantage yall say works for george
dwight showed height and coming in like joe did didnt matter
tom showed punches wide like tyson and hitting quick punches would show a effect on George
mike fought Smith who was slow and strong like George u weird people will say but he wasnt strong as George why do that matter as if if he had been as strong he would land no cause he was still slow
why is it everytime we make the point of who mike fought that was comparable to George like smith and trever who did pushes yall say it's wrong when it's on video showing trever did pushes and smith was slow and strong like George
but when yall say the blind quote of mike was like joe even tho they fought nothing alike that's right its hypocritical
why would mike who had the best defense of all time in hw lose to George and mike fought smith who was strong but faster then frank and frank was almost as slow as George and almost as strong and neither one could hit mike much so why would George
another proof is berbick which I exposed George wouldnt be able to keep doing that to keep space berbick abused it keep getting countered George was slower then berbick
dwight style like joe but better defense
ali and jim fast punchers and defense
frank real slow and almost as George
smith slow and strong
all people who show George would lose to mike if if nothing like I told u nobody to name who show George would even hit mike often
And no it wouldn't be anything like a joe or ken match cause mike fought nothing like them
so why say that makes no sense
Mike would destroy him in 1st watch the matches i said and you will see george has no chance
Mike Tyson could keep hitting Foreman's body,his precision punching would have been difficult to digest,as long as Tyson's motivation (killer instinct)was there everything would have fallen into place for him there isn't going to be any debate on that but if he wasn't mentally fit even a 12 years old girl would beat him,all of his problems started to happen because he lost control of his mind he let others steer his mind and that was his biggest problem...
He’d have to get inside while taking not Ali or Holmes like jabs, but blows that turn your head. George had the perfect defense for the swarmers. He’d use his hands like a wrestler and deflect their direction and push to keep them off balance. That’s when the big punches, like the uppercut, would catch them.
Watch the first Foreman/Frazier fight. You’ll see what I’m talking about.
Styles make fights. Tyson was all wrong for George. Ali handled tall sluggers (like Foreman) well but had problems with swarmers.
Tyson in his prime would have given Ali fits.
@@vgr112261 ...Tyson would have never defeated Ali, PERIOD!!!
@@brucescott4261 no mike will beat ali
@@brucescott4261 beat more advanced ver of him slow person
@@kennykross3306 Watch Tyson against Lennox Lewis who was older than Tyson...Tyson got schooled..Ali in Ali's prime would move, stick and Jab and wipe the floor with him...Who of any caliber did Tyson actually beat..? Even Holyfield was 4 years older than Tyson and had him bitting ears..Tyson was a good fighter, and a great retired fork lift driver destroyer..
Tyson was built for Foreman
Yea he was i argee he would win
but bags dont hit back
Nate Vasquez said it perfectly, no one could beat Mike Tyson in his prime.
You must share the same Iq, foreman was the natural counter of peek-a-boo, but there is no point to remind you that.
hah, what a sily argument, noone could beat him. like a child
@@azteka6103 You must share the same iq, foreman was the natural counter of peek-a-boo, but there is no point to remind you that.
Ian Kelly ...Douglas defeated Tyson. The latter was in his prime when he was knocked out by the former.
AJ
I’m a massive foreman fan. Usually I’d say George would win over Tyson mainly because of their styles. I’m looking at the Frazier and Norton fight. BUT. A PRIME mike Tyson? Mike Tyson would knock out Frazier just like he did Marvis Frazier. And Tyson is a different animal altogether. Tyson also has bombs and if he hit big George. I believe he would wobble him just like Ron Lyle wobbled foreman except Tyson would finish the job. And Tyson ain’t no fool. Even though George has a strong chin and would push Tyson back to pummel him. I believe Tyson would use his speed and find a way to get in and land one.
I’m a massive foreman fan. Usually I’d say George would win over Tyson mainly because of their styles. I’m looking at the Frazier and Norton fight. BUT. A PRIME mike Tyson? Mike Tyson would knock out Frazier just like he did Marvis Frazier. And Tyson is a different animal altogether. Tyson also has bombs and if he hit big George. I believe he would wobble him just like Ron Lyle wobbled foreman except Tyson would finish the job. And Tyson ain’t no fool. Even though George has a strong chin and would push Tyson back to pummel him. I believe Tyson would use his speed and find a way to get in and land one.
I’m a massive foreman fan. Usually I’d say George would win over Tyson mainly because of their styles. I’m looking at the Frazier and Norton fight. BUT. A PRIME mike Tyson? Mike Tyson would knock out Frazier just like he did Marvis Frazier. And Tyson is a different animal altogether. Tyson also has bombs and if he hit big George. I believe he would wobble him just like Ron Lyle wobbled foreman except Tyson would finish the job. And Tyson ain’t no fool. Even though George has a strong chin and would push Tyson back to pummel him. I believe Tyson would use his speed and find a way to get in and land one.
I’m a massive foreman fan. Usually I’d say George would win over Tyson mainly because of their styles. I’m looking at the Frazier and Norton fight. BUT. A PRIME mike Tyson? Mike Tyson would knock out Frazier just like he did Marvis Frazier. And Tyson is a different animal altogether. Tyson also has bombs and if he hit big George. I believe he would wobble him just like Ron Lyle wobbled foreman except Tyson would finish the job. And Tyson ain’t no fool. Even though George has a strong chin and would push Tyson back to pummel him. I believe Tyson would use his speed and find a way to get in and land
Marvis and joe were 2 different fighters, that's like saying Ali's grandson is the greatest of this generation simply because he is related to ali
Anitelu Falemei ...Marvis Frazier wasn't anywhere near his father, Smokin' Joe! Tyson would have never knock out out the latter.
Foreman tutta la vita
Tyson
yea and wouldnt last long anybody voted for George is crazy or blind maybe both
@@cmoneytheman fanboys, Foreman would do him the way he did frazier
@@mr.b9613 yup and doing that would get george koed try watching matches instead of saying silly quotes
Tyson had better speed than foreman but I don't know. If that would have made a difference so I'll go with big George to be the victor in the end!
the young george def was weaker then his old ver u can see he had no real def in his young days
dwight fought like a better def version of dwight used head movement and angles so if joe used that same style he could have put down george
followers got mutiple points which was shown to be flawed
george height is advantage
pushes means he dominates
his power was to much
uppercuts and iabs keep take a person out fast
swammers lose fast
dwight showed if joe used the same defense he would have beat george cause I told u young george couldnt take damage even close to the old ver
and dwight was a better swammer then joe didnt used his block good u have to use angles to make George wide punches miss and he made him miss often and dwight blocked often joe didnt show these same def skills
they never bring up dwight and act like the match never happened heshowed that dumb flawed quote of all swammers lose is crap and folks still say it I dont know why
dwight only lost cause he was tired he did better then joes both matches
dwight only lost cause he was tired he was winning rounds
george said for dwight
he said he had trouble hittin him
even tho george was taller then him and used the jabs another advantage yall say works for george
dwight showed height and coming in like joe did didnt matter
tom showed punches wide like tyson and hitting quick punches would show a effect on George
mike fought Smith who was slow and strong like George u weird people will say but he wasnt strong as George why do that matter as if if he had been as strong he would land no cause he was still slow
why is it everytime we make the point of who mike fought that was comparable to George like smith and trever who did pushes yall say it's wrong when it's on video showing trever did pushes and smith was slow and strong like George
but when yall say the dumb blind quote of mike was like joe even though they fought nothing alike that's right its hypocritical
why would mike who had the best defense of all time in hw lose to George and mike fought smith who was strong but faster then frank and frank was almost as slow as George and almost as strong and neither one could hit mike much so why would George
another proof is berbick which I exposed George wouldnt be able to keep doing that to keep space berbick abused it keep getting countered George was slower then berbick
dwight style like joe but better defense
ali and jim fast punchers and defense
frank real slow and almost as George
smith slow and strong
all people who show George would lose to mike if if nothing like I told u nobody to name who show George would even hit mike often
See how you shouldn't repeat quotes that make no sense next time watch before you speak
most of tysons knockouts came from his hook to the body then uppercut, tyson would not be able to really get off on foreman without taking a pounding. a young strong and mean foreman for my vote
the young george def was weaker then his old ver u can see he had no real def in his young days
dwight fought like a better def version of dwight used head movement and angles so if joe used that same style he could have put down george
followers got mutiple points which was shown to be flawed
george height is advantage
pushes means he dominates
his power was to much
uppercuts and iabs keep take a person out fast
swammers lose fast
dwight showed if joe used the same defense he would have beat george cause I told u young george couldnt take damage even close to the old ver
and dwight was a better swammer then joe didnt used his block good u have to use angles to make George wide punches miss and he made him miss often and dwight blocked often joe didnt show these same def skills
they never bring up dwight and act like the match never happened he showed that dumb flawed quote of all swammers lose is crap and folks still say it I dont know why
dwight only lost cause he was tired he did better then joes both matches
dwight only lost cause he was tired he was winning rounds
george said for dwight
he said he had trouble hittin him
even tho george was taller then him and used the jabs another advantage yall say works for george
dwight showed height and coming in like joe did didnt matter
tom showed punches wide like tyson and hitting quick punches would show a effect on George
mike fought Smith who was slow and strong like George u weird people will say but he wasnt strong as George why do that matter as if if he had been as strong he would land no cause he was still slow
why is it everytime we make the point of who mike fought that was comparable to George like smith and trever who did pushes yall say it's wrong when it's on video showing trever did pushes and smith was slow and strong like George
but when yall say the blind quote of mike was like joe even tho they fought nothing alike that's right its hypocritical
why would mike who had one of the best defense of all time in hw lose to George and mike fought smith who was strong but faster then frank and frank was almost as slow as George and almost as strong and neither one could hit mike much so why would George
another proof is berbick which I exposed George wouldnt be able to keep doing that to keep space berbick abused it keep getting countered George was slower then berbick
And no it wouldn't be anything like a joe match cause mike fought nothing like him
So no mike wouldnt take many shots it was stupid to say he would
@@ascendediam WTF are you talking about????
@@fenderboy68 WTF are you talking about????
i got george too, but how in the world the mike that fought douglas ,was prime mike , come on
@@cmoneytheman his chin was his defense. look at the Hollyfield fight and tell me how can someone take these punches and keep standing
U got him to lose
What’s a good way for a shorter fighter to beat foreman?
@@ascendediam You're fucking delusional it's crazy 🤣 foreman beats any version of Mike. period
@SpannerzIsHappy the young george def was weaker then his old ver u can see he had no real def in his young days
dwight fought like a better def version of dwight used head movement and angles so if joe used that same style he could have put down george
followers got mutiple points which was shown to be flawed
george height is advantage
pushes means he dominates
his power was to much
uppercuts and iabs keep take a person out fast
swammers lose fast
dwight showed if joe used the same defense he would have beat george cause I told u young george couldnt take damage even close to the old ver
and dwight was a better swammer then joe didnt used his block good u have to use angles to make George wide punches miss and he made him miss often and dwight blocked often joe didnt show these same def skills
they never bring up dwight and act like the match never happened he showed that dumb flawed quote of all swammers lose is crap and folks still say it I dont know why
dwight only lost cause he was tired he did better then joes both matches
dwight only lost cause he was tired he was winning rounds
george said for dwight
he said he had trouble hittin him
even tho george was taller then him and used the jabs another advantage yall say works for george
dwight showed height and coming in like joe did didnt matter
tom showed punches wide like tyson and hitting quick punches would show a effect on George
mike fought Smith who was slow and strong like George u weird people will say but he wasnt strong as George why do that matter as if if he had been as strong he would land no cause he was still slow
why is it everytime we make the point of who mike fought that was comparable to George like smith and trever who did pushes yall say it's wrong when it's on video showing trever did pushes and smith was slow and strong like George
but when yall say the blind quote of mike was like joe even tho they fought nothing alike that's right its hypocritical
why would mike who had the best defense of all time in hw lose to George and mike fought smith who was strong but faster then frank and frank was almost as slow as George and almost as strong and neither one could hit mike much so why would George
another proof is berbick which I exposed George wouldnt be able to keep doing that to keep space berbick abused it keep getting countered George was slower then berbick
dwight style like joe but better defense
ali and jim fast punchers and defense
frank real slow and almost as George
smith slow and strong
all people who show George would lose to mike if if nothing like I told u nobody to name who show George would even hit mike often
And no it wouldn't be anything like a joe or ken match cause mine fought nothing like them so why say that makes no sense see how you shouldn't repeat silly quotes you read like the man told you he was nothing like Joe so why keep saying it its on video all you have to do is watch
So no it he wouldnt win try watching these matches nothing to do with height
I too say foremen and I don't think Tyson will able to handle foreman bombs , no way
I too say you dumb I agree mike wouldnt handle george shots cause he wouldnt be getting hit much
Iron mike
yea how would George win to slow
A lot of people compare Mike Tyson to Joe Frazier or Marciano swarming style but you can't compare Tyson to them his defense was so much tighter and his combinations and speed would've been just too much for a young foremanIf a Jimmy Young could beat Forman and Ron Lye could drop him in their fight definitely Mike Tyson takes a young foreman out within 3 to 4 rounds
wouldnt take that long 2nd and everything u said is right these crazy followers dont watch just say mike was like joe it's easy to see they was nothing alike
I had to scroll down forever to find someone that I agree with that Mike Tyson would take Foreman.
I have no clue why everyone thinks George Foreman would take Tyson in their Primes.
Muhammad Ali took George Foreman. Mike Tyson is even faster and harder hitting then Muhammad Ali and he's got a better defense.
Tyson would absolutely take George Foreman.
@@steveh7108 ali and Mike had 2 totally different styles, look at floyd patterson (a swarmer) he got dominated by sonny liston (a slugger), look at frazier and foreman (swarmer vs slugger), styles make fights, slugger>swarmer
@@steveh7108 cause they mental and don't watch matches is why they pick george the man was way to slow and had no defense
@@cmoneytheman if you say stuff like "styles don't make fights dummy" you're making yourself look like a dummy, you just pretty much told me you know nothing about boxing, anybody with any boxing knowledge knows that floyd had the peek a boo style mastered better than Mike, Mike just had more power and I never said floyd and joe were the same so that's strike 2 dummy, learn to read
mike tyson would have made george miss a lot of punches and then tyson would go in for the kill.
george has a chance but not a good chance at beating tyson.
No chance to slow and easy to read
LOL, Tyson wouldn't even get in close enough for his uppercut. Big George would rock him with his right cross when Tyson walks in and then start the beating on little Mike.
@@fenderboy68 the young george def was weaker then his old ver u can see he had no real def in his young days
dwight fought like a better def version of dwight used head movement and angles so if joe used that same style he could have put down george
followers got mutiple points which was shown to be flawed
george height is advantage
pushes means he dominates
his power was to much
uppercuts and iabs keep take a person out fast
swammers lose fast
dwight showed if joe used the same defense he would have beat george cause I told u young george couldnt take damage even close to the old ver
and dwight was a better swammer then joe didnt used his block good u have to use angles to make George wide punches miss and he made him miss often and dwight blocked often joe didnt show these same def skills
they never bring up dwight and act like the match never happened he showed that dumb flawed quote of all swammers lose is crap and folks still say it I dont know why
dwight only lost cause he was tired he did better then joes both matches
dwight only lost cause he was tired he was winning rounds
george said for dwight
he said he had trouble hittin him
even tho george was taller then him and used the jabs another advantage yall say works for george
dwight showed height and coming in like joe did didnt matter
tom showed punches wide like tyson and hitting quick punches would show a effect on George
mike fought Smith who was slow and strong like George u weird people will say but he wasnt strong as George why do that matter as if if he had been as strong he would land no cause he was still slow
why is it everytime we make the point of who mike fought that was comparable to George like smith and trever who did pushes yall say it's wrong when it's on video showing trever did pushes and smith was slow and strong like George
but when yall say the blind quote of mike was like joe even tho they fought nothing alike that's right its hypocritical
why would mike who had one of the best defense of all time in hw lose to George and mike fought smith who was strong but faster then frank and frank was almost as slow as George and almost as strong and neither one could hit mike much so why would George
another proof is berbick which I exposed George wouldnt be able to keep doing that to keep space berbick abused it keep getting countered George was slower then berbick
And no it wouldn't be anything like a joe match cause mike fought nothing like him
So no mike wouldnt take many shots it was stupid to say he would
1:26 legg seg Amalie
sam peters should start training again , he would ko most of the bums today , including Joshua lol.
That Muslim say he don't smoke Marijuana but he clearly got the shivers and itches🤔
he obviously wasnt the youngest heavyweight in the world on accident
What about Marciano vs. Tyson in their primes.
stop trolling
Tyson by Homicide.
Tyson is too big and too powerful. Sorry but the Rock would have been a cruiserweight today. He would be an all time great at that weight though.
@@bobbywise2313 and mike was to fast and good at defense to be beat by son so you make no sense troll
I got Tyson in his prime. No one beats Tyson in his prime.
why would anybody pick george is crazy he was to slow and sloopy wouldnt land much
B M ...James "Buster" Douglas, February 11th, 1990. Tokyo, Japan. Tyson was knocked out in the tenth round by Douglas.
@@brucescott4261 I said in his prime pal. Tyson was not there mentally. Key work is PRIME
@@BM-vl6bo ...Tyson was twenty-three years old, when he fought Douglas. What is your version of prime? Tyson was knocked by a journeyman, who was older than your boy, and also ranked number seven. You're making excuses for Tyson.
@@brucescott4261 my version of prime is when your in your combination of best physical and mental shape. Most legendary boxing trainers say boxing is 70-90% mental. His mental was not there, hence not in his prime
50 year old Foreman wins heavyweight title. 50 year old Tyson stand up comedy in the guise of wisdom.....LOL!!!!!
50 year old Foreman wins heavyweight title. 50 year old Tyson stand up comedy in the guise of wisdom..... LOL!!!!!
There ain't nobody who could beat a prime 20-year-old Mike Tyson. Tyson was lightning fast and in his prime, he was hard to hit.
Ali - ultra-lightning fast!
Ali and George both would've fucked tyson up......
Shut the fuck up with this shit no most of the great heavyweights would not just beat knock hım the fuck out and thats what happend when he fougt all time great heavyweights he got knocked the fuck out he only beat out of shape 40 yo Larry Holmes other than that Lennox,Holyfield,Buster all of them knocked hım the fuck out
Ali was faster, and no way would tyson evade every single bomb a young george foreman would throw. Ron lyle found out you cant trade blows with big george
@@yasin_ucar Bro Tyson went longer against Lennox Lewis than Klitschko and Morrison.
once it turns to politics , its over
People saying Foreman would win against Tyson but no to Liston against Tyson. Just search what Foreman had to say about Liston. Liston is perhaps the most underrated HW of all time. And just see what Ali said about Liston in comparison to Foreman. No contest. Even in death Liston is disrespected
I think prime Sonny beats both of them. Sonny had the hardest jab of any heavyweight. Plus he had incredible reach.
@@bobbywise2313 doesn't matter what your messed up mind thinks video proves you wrong
mike fought a man named lorenzo he moved around lateral but had a basic come forward slow jab he was destroyed cause of it dont believe me watch the match
Son was easy to read and was more sloopy and had that same basic come forward jab it's no way you can really see him and lorenzo and cant see lorenz was more advanced and act like you see son was more advanced then him and think you see son able to survive its obvious son would be destroyed
Even old George would have took Tyson. And Tyson knew it. Don King got Foreman to sign up for the fight for 5million but Tyson turned it down.
What quote are you about? Watch the Letterman interview in '89. George publicly announced he signed to fight Tyson when Don King brought him the paper.
Watch another Don King interview where he says Mike told him "if you like George that much, then you should fight him"
Tyson himself said he was in the same mould as Liston. And so was Foreman. BUT after the Ali loss, George changed his style and became a wiser, fighter. He went 12 rounds with Holyfield. When Tyson got knocked out and bit his ear losing both times. And that's at age 42.
George was the hardest hitting fighter of ALL TIME. Holyfield said it.
@@cmoneytheman dont take my word on it. Look up Letterman foreman interview. And also look up Holyfield on foreman. At around the 8 or 9 minute mark he says "Foreman maybe the hardest puncher ever" his opinion matters because he fought and knocked out a lot of great champs including ttson twice. Tyson was like Conor McGregor- an iconic fighter but a flash in a pan.
Sonny Liston was undefeated for 9.5yrs before Ali. While Tyson only made it 5year.
Tyson wasn't in the same league as foreman.
Who did Mike beat? Old Larry Holmes and Spinks? C'mon. He told to the greats of the era. Lennox, Holyfield.
And Holyfields opinion means nothing? He faught them both. And was a great champion.
What makes your word more valuable than his. If he said foreman was the hardest hitter. I'm taking his word.
Remember his 'anywhere punch'? Foreman beat far greater fighters like Joe Frazier and Kenny Norton and all those guys in the golden age of boxing. Actually demolished them all. And won the championship at 45 again.
Tyson was past his prime at 25
@@cmoneytheman Holmes was a legend but he was 38 when he lost to Tyson. C'mon.
He also lost twice to berbick who I do not rate so highly either. Guess he was just not in his prime anymore. But he was a great fighter.
And holyfield beat Holmes. I rate holyfield highly as a fighter. Beat alot of greats and I'd take his word when he says someone was the best .
Foreman. Here’s why. Foreman beat fighters of all sizes. Tyson struggled with larger fighters. Foreman could take the punishment, which he displayed several times. Tyson, not as much. Love em both, but Foreman.
the young george def was weaker then his old ver u can see he had no real def in his young days
dwight fought like a better def version of dwight used head movement and angles so if joe used that same style he could have put down george
dumb followers got mutiple points which was shown to be flawed
george height is advantage
pushes means he dominates
his power was to much
uppercuts and iabs keep take a person out fast
swammers lose fast
dwight showed if joe used the same defense he would have beat george cause I told u young george couldnt take damage even close to the old ver
and dwight was a better swammer then joe didnt used his block good u have to use angles to make George wide punches miss and he made him miss often and dwight blocked often joe didnt show these same def skills
they never bring up dwight and act like the match never happened heshowed that dumb flawed quote of all swammers lose is crap and folks still say it I dont know why
dwight only lost cause he was tired he did better then joes both matches
dwight only lost cause he was tired he was winning rounds
george said for dwight
he said he had trouble hittin him
even tho george was taller then him and used the jabs another advantage yall say works for george
dwight showed height and coming in like joe did didnt matter
tom showed punches wide like tyson and hitting quick punches would show a effect on George
mike fought Smith who was slow and strong like George u weird people will say but he wasnt strong as George why do that matter as if if he had been as strong he would land no cause he was still slow
why is it everytime we make the point of who mike fought that was comparable to George like smith and trever who did pushes yall say it's wrong when it's on video showing trever did pushes and smith was slow and strong like George
but when yall say the dumb blind quote of mike was like joe even tho they fought nothing alike that's right its hypocritical
why would mike who had the best defense of all time in hw lose to George and mike fought smith who was strong but faster then frank and frank was almost as slow as George and almost as strong and neither one could hit mike much so why would George
another proof is berbick which I exposed George wouldnt be able to keep doing that to keep space berbick abused it keep getting countered George was slower then berbick
dwight style like joe but better defense
ali and jim fast punchers and defense
frank real slow and almost as George
smith slow and strong
all people who show George would lose to mike if if nothing like I told u nobody to name who show George would even hit mike often
See how you shouldn't repeat silly quotes and george wasn't tough he was hurt by Ron 1st ron all over the place close to end and almost fell and hurt every round after
Foreman
Yea he loses
I love Tyson, but im picking Foreman too.
U pick him to lose me to way to slow with no defense no way he could win that way
Crazy BS! Tyson from '85-'89 was the greatest heavyweight of all time. I like Forman as a person. Tyson is a lowlife. But, Tyson's speed neutralized all big men. Tyson is one of the greatest experts of the game.
Foreman was a beast! Mike was great but Foreman! WOE! I have to go with FOREMAN. He almost beat Holyfield when he was an old man! George would've beat Holyfield in his prime! Think about what George did when he fought Holyfield. George in his prime would've won! He ALMOST kicked his ass as an old man! What are you on about? lol
the young george def was weaker then his old ver u can see he had no real def in his young days
dwight fought like a better def version of dwight used head movement and angles so if joe used that same style he could have put down george
followers got mutiple points which was shown to be flawed
george height is advantage
pushes means he dominates
his power was to much
uppercuts and iabs keep take a person out fast
swammers lose fast
dwight showed if joe used the same defense he would have beat george cause I told u young george couldnt take damage even close to the old ver
and dwight was a better swammer then joe didnt used his block good u have to use angles to make George wide punches miss and he made him miss often and dwight blocked often joe didnt show these same def skills
they never bring up dwight and act like the match never happened he showed that dumb flawed quote of all swammers lose is crap and folks still say it I dont know why
dwight only lost cause he was tired he did better then joes both matches
dwight only lost cause he was tired he was winning rounds
george said for dwight
he said he had trouble hittin him
even tho george was taller then him and used the jabs another advantage yall say works for george
dwight showed height and coming in like joe did didnt matter
tom showed punches wide like tyson and hitting quick punches would show a effect on George
mike fought Smith who was slow and strong like George u weird people will say but he wasnt strong as George why do that matter as if if he had been as strong he would land no cause he was still slow
why is it everytime we make the point of who mike fought that was comparable to George like smith and trever who did pushes yall say it's wrong when it's on video showing trever did pushes and smith was slow and strong like George
but when yall say the blind quote of mike was like joe even tho they fought nothing alike that's right its hypocritical
why would mike who had the best defense of all time in hw lose to George and mike fought smith who was strong but faster then frank and frank was almost as slow as George and almost as strong and neither one could hit mike much so why would George
another proof is berbick which I exposed George wouldnt be able to keep doing that to keep space berbick abused it keep getting countered George was slower then berbick
dwight style like joe but better defense
ali and jim fast punchers and defense
frank real slow and almost as George
smith slow and strong
all people who show George would lose to mike if if nothing like I told u nobody to name who show George would even hit mike often
And no it wouldn't be anything like a joe or ken match cause mine fought nothing like them so why say that makes no sense see how you shouldn't repeat silly quotes you read like the man told you he was nothing like Joe so why keep saying it its on video all you have to do is watch
So no it he wouldnt win try watching these matches why would you go for a type that never beat Mike your weird
@ascendediam no
@@guitarttimman the young george def was weaker then his old ver u can see he had no real def in his young days
tom showed punches wide like tyson and hitting quick punches would show a effect on George
mike fought Smith who was slow and strong like George u weird people will say but he wasnt strong as George why do that matter as if if he had been as strong he would land no cause he was still slow
why is it everytime we make the point of who mike fought that was comparable to George like smith and trever who did pushes yall say it's wrong when it's on video showing trever did pushes and smith was slow and strong like George
but when yall say the blind quote of mike was like joe even tho they fought nothing alike that's right its hypocritical
why would mike who had the best defense at the time in hw lose to George and mike fought smith who was strong but faster then frank and frank was almost as slow as George and almost as strong and neither one could hit mike much so why would George
another proof is berbick which I exposed George wouldnt be able to keep doing that to keep space berbick abused it keep getting countered George was slower then berbick
Mike had trouble with rangy fighters who fought from range who had lateral movement who had good hand speed and who had good defense
They even say in the trever match which I described thats not the way to fight him he came nonstop forward
Wasnt that the exact same way george fought? He didn't fight off the jab or use any lateral movement while fighting from distance george would lose off of the breakdown and even said by the commentaries like I said
Mike wasnt joe his weaknesses wasnt a uppercut that he just kept running through especially not a slow easy to read one from a person as slow as george it was like I said a person who fought from range and who used good lateral movement
Nobody has anybody George fought that can compare to mike so how is it they said he would beat Mike where does it come from its based off of nothing which is odd
I agree with this one. Most people are saying George. That is common sense. Mike was great, but George was the best. Now George would have a better chance against BL. George was a beast!
the young george def was weaker then his old ver u can see he had no real def in his young days
dwight fought like a better def version of dwight used head movement and angles so if joe used that same style he could have put down george
followers got mutiple points which was shown to be flawed
george height is advantage
pushes means he dominates
his power was to much
uppercuts and iabs keep take a person out fast
swammers lose fast
dwight showed if joe used the same defense he would have beat george cause I told u young george couldnt take damage even close to the old ver
and dwight was a better swammer then joe didnt used his block good u have to use angles to make George wide punches miss and he made him miss often and dwight blocked often joe didnt show these same def skills
they never bring up dwight and act like the match never happened he showed that dumb flawed quote of all swammers lose is crap and folks still say it I dont know why
dwight only lost cause he was tired he did better then joes both matches
dwight only lost cause he was tired he was winning rounds
george said for dwight
he said he had trouble hittin him
even tho george was taller then him and used the jabs another advantage yall say works for george
dwight showed height and coming in like joe did didnt matter
tom showed punches wide like tyson and hitting quick punches would show a effect on George
mike fought Smith who was slow and strong like George u weird people will say but he wasnt strong as George why do that matter as if if he had been as strong he would land no cause he was still slow
why is it everytime we make the point of who mike fought that was comparable to George like smith and trever who did pushes yall say it's wrong when it's on video showing trever did pushes and smith was slow and strong like George
but when yall say the blind quote of mike was like joe even tho they fought nothing alike that's right its hypocritical
why would mike who had the best defense of all time in hw lose to George and mike fought smith who was strong but faster then frank and frank was almost as slow as George and almost as strong and neither one could hit mike much so why would George
another proof is berbick which I exposed George wouldnt be able to keep doing that to keep space berbick abused it keep getting countered George was slower then berbick
dwight style like joe but better defense
ali and jim fast punchers and defense
frank real slow and almost as George
smith slow and strong
all people who show George would lose to mike if if nothing like I told u nobody to name who show George would even hit mike often
And no it wouldn't be anything like a joe or ken match cause mine fought nothing like them so why say that makes no sense see how you shouldn't repeat silly quotes you read like the man told you he was nothing like Joe so why keep saying it its on video all you have to do is watch
So no it he wouldnt win try watching these matches common sense is mike wins
I have gone back on forth on this one just as I have prime Holmes vs. Prime Foreman.
Both Tyson and Foreman had short primes. For Mike it was 87 to 88. For George it was perhaps 73 till the fight in Zaire. George was not the same after that Ali fight. He was psychologically devasted by that fight. Mike began a decline shortly after the Spinks fight. Firing Rooney was the beginning of the end for Mike.
So for this fight I would have to take the George of Frazier 1 and Kenny Norton against the Tyson of Holmes and Spinks. Yes we could add the Berbick fight also.
This could go one of two ways. Mike could effectively cover using his peak a boo defense and counter with brutal body shots and then come up stairs. The double hook was his best punch. If successful he puts Foreman away inside of four rounds.
Or Foreman would use his reach and jab Tyson to help set up huge punches. He would push and wrestle Mike around to keep range. I must point out with prime George it did not matter if what he hit. I saw him knock a guy across the ring by hitting him on the shoulder. He could connect to the side Mike's head and knock his guard down with brutal punches. What Ali did in Africa was something no other fighter could have done. Even though the majority of his punches were not connecting some did. And even the punches to the arms and hips would devastate most fighters. Ali had super speed and skill to counter with very straight fast shots to George's face to further keep wear on him. But I can't think of any other fighter who would have survived those first 4 rounds like Ali did.
Of course Mike would not try a Rope A Dope or be an easy target like Frazier. But the question is would it matter if George was clubbing him. Even punches that hit gloves or shoulders do serious damage.
I could easily see this either way and both would be capable of knocking the other out. And there is no way this goes beyond 6 rounds. One of the two will be counted out or be out on his feet forcing the ref to stop the contest. If forced to pick a winner I would go with George. But I would not put much money on it.
I think a prime Sonny Liston could beat either though. His jab was one of the best ever.
the young george def was weaker then his old ver u can see he had no real def in his young days
dwight fought like a better def version of dwight used head movement and angles so if joe used that same style he could have put down george
followers got mutiple points which was shown to be flawed
george height is advantage
pushes means he dominates
his power was to much
uppercuts and iabs keep take a person out fast
swammers lose fast
dwight showed if joe used the same defense he would have beat george cause I told u young george couldnt take damage even close to the old ver
and dwight was a better swammer then joe didnt used his block good u have to use angles to make George wide punches miss and he made him miss often and dwight blocked often joe didnt show these same def skills
they never bring up dwight and act like the match never happened he showed that dumb flawed quote of all swammers lose is crap and folks still say it I dont know why
dwight only lost cause he was tired he did better then joes both matches
dwight only lost cause he was tired he was winning rounds
george said for dwight
he said he had trouble hittin him
even tho george was taller then him and used the jabs another advantage yall say works for george
dwight showed height and coming in like joe did didnt matter
tom showed punches wide like tyson and hitting quick punches would show a effect on George
mike fought Smith who was slow and strong like George u weird people will say but he wasnt strong as George why do that matter as if if he had been as strong he would land no cause he was still slow
why is it everytime we make the point of who mike fought that was comparable to George like smith and trever who did pushes yall say it's wrong when it's on video showing trever did pushes and smith was slow and strong like George
but when yall say the blind quote of mike was like joe even tho they fought nothing alike that's right its hypocritical
why would mike who had the best defense of all time in hw lose to George and mike fought smith who was strong but faster then frank and frank was almost as slow as George and almost as strong and neither one could hit mike much so why would George
another proof is berbick which I exposed George wouldnt be able to keep doing that to keep space berbick abused it keep getting countered George was slower then berbick
dwight style like joe but better defense
ali and jim fast punchers and defense
frank real slow and almost as George
smith slow and strong
all people who show George would lose to mike if if nothing like I told u nobody to name who show George would even hit mike often
And no it wouldn't be anything like a joe or ken match cause mine fought nothing like them so why say that makes no sense see how you shouldn't repeat silly quotes you read like the man told you he was nothing like Joe so why keep saying it its on video all you have to do is watch
So no it he wouldnt win try watching these matches to bad you people who pretend to be blind and slow cant admit the truth
You cant go over this breakdown of the matches cause its all true so your wrong and you had no reason to say that george would best a person he wouldn't even land on enough or one that gave Mike trouble
Mike had trouble with rangy fighters who fought from range who had lateral movement who had good hand speed and who had good defense
They even say in the trever match which I described thats not the way to fight him he came nonstop forward
Wasnt that the exact same way george fought? He didn't fight off the jab or use any lateral movement while fighting from distance you dont have to like it but its fact geoege would lose off of the breakdown and even said by the commentaries like I said
Mike wasnt joe his weaknesses wasnt a uppercut that he just kept running through especially not a slow easy to read one from a person as slow as george it was like I said a person who fought from range and who used good lateral movement
joe fought in a straight line
moved head to much and up and down
threw jabs and straight hooks
did 2 punch combos
Tyson fought in a straight line bkut once close punched from angles
moved head around not just simple like joe
didnt throw much jabs
threw wide hooks
jumped into punches when he was a distance from the person
mike did this
tyson would dodge while doin combos joe didnt do that ether
did 4 or 5 punch combos mike did this
joe fought from close range
mike was mid range
mike was a counter puncher
joe wasnt a counter puncher he was a ducking and then punch take 1 and give one
Not similar at all see how you shouldn't repeat quotes other followes who dont watch say so you had no reason to say a joe vs george match as it made no sense to compare
Foreman kill tyson 1 round
troll
@@cmoneytheman ur mom
ur mom
This used to be much longer and the consensus was for foreman
the young george def was weaker then his old ver u can see he had no real def in his young days
tom showed punches wide like tyson and hitting quick punches would show a effect on George
mike fought Smith who was slow and strong like George u weird people will say but he wasnt strong as George why do that matter as if if he had been as strong he would land no cause he was still slow
why is it everytime we make the point of who mike fought that was comparable to George like smith and trever who did pushes yall say it's wrong when it's on video showing trever did pushes and smith was slow and strong like George
but when yall say the blind quote of mike was like joe even tho they fought nothing alike that's right its hypocritical
why would mike who had the best defense at the time in hw lose to George and mike fought smith who was strong but faster then frank and frank was almost as slow as George and almost as strong and neither one could hit mike much so why would George
another proof is berbick which I exposed George wouldnt be able to keep doing that to keep space berbick abused it keep getting countered George was slower then berbick
Mike had trouble with rangy fighters who fought from range who had lateral movement who had good hand speed and who had good defense
They even say in the trever match which I described thats not the way to fight him he came nonstop forward
Wasnt that the exact same way george fought? He didn't fight off the jab or use any lateral movement while fighting from distance george would lose off of the breakdown and even said by the commentaries like I said
Mike wasnt joe his weaknesses wasnt a uppercut that he just kept running through especially not a slow easy to read one from a person as slow as george it was like I said a person who fought from range and who used good lateral movement
Nobody has anybody George fought that can compare to mike so how is it they said he would beat Mike where does it come from its based off of nothing which is odd
Foreman!
Yea he loses
I don’t mind that Sharif and Vasquez pick Tyson but there points are trash and it shows that they are not true students of the game of boxing . Even Angelo Dundee said George over Tyson and Liston any day he also said that if George had his younger self mixed with his older self than who could beat him. George was faster than he looked and he really didn’t waist his punches
Even cus didnt say that dumb follower thats a myth and no george wasn't fast and did waste punches alot liar both son and george was easy to read and slow
Even if cus said that dont mean mike would have to lose just cause a person said so u dummy
@@cmoneytheman you don’t know shit about boxing
@@Sldumas1983 you don't know shit about boxing
I don’t mind that Sharif and Vasquez pick Tyson but there points are trash and it shows that they are not true students of the game of boxing . Even Angelo Dundee said George over Tyson and Liston any day he also said that if George had his younger self mixed with his older self than who could beat him. George was faster than he looked and he really didn’t waist his punches
I don’t mind that Sharif and Vasquez pick Tyson but there points are trash and it shows that they are not true students of the game of boxing . Even Angelo Dundee said George over Tyson and Liston any day he also said that if George had his younger self mixed with his older self than who could beat him. George was faster than he looked and he really didn’t waist his punches
Ron Lyle put George Foreman on the mat twice. But Big George got back up and ended up winning the fight by knocking out Lyle. I don't think Foreman would get up from a Mike Tyson punch. And Mike Tyson probably won't get up from a Foreman punch either. But I believe Tyson would connect first because he's quicker than Foreman. So I'll have to put my money on Tyson.
wrong mike wouldnt never get dropped by George he was to slow George would get up twice but the 3rd time no
@@cmoneytheman I didn't say he would get dropped. And I said George Foreman wouldn't get up from a Mike Tyson punch. You didn't read carefully.
@@bradfordlee7384 I did read if I responded to u
@@cmoneytheman And didn't read correctly and responded irresponsibly.
@@bradfordlee7384 And didnt read correctly and responded irresponsibly.
I see Tyson winning but not knocking George out, maybe stumbling him a few times.
@@cmoneytheman styles makes fights, even Tommy Morrison hits harder than Ron but George was walking down Morrison and taking every he threw at him
@@cmoneytheman Young George would have taken Morrison's head off. George was way passed his prime.
@@cmoneytheman He knocked out Ron Lyle so what are you even talking about, lol.
@@cmoneytheman So by using your logic you believe that Ron Lyle hit harder than Tommy Morrison right? LOL. Also Fury knocked out Wilder but didn't even wobble Otto Wallin so this means that Otto Wallin would easily beat Wilder? Yes styles make fights and great fighters have off days but still manage to win.
@@cmoneytheman What are you even talking about? You seem to be struggling with basic reading and comprehension and if you think that someone winning a fight by KO is insignificant I really can't take you seriously. We're not talking about Tommy's ability to avoid attacks, we're talking about George Foreman being able to withstand multiple hard punches for 12 rounds which would have KO'd 99% of heavyweights but Lyle who doesn't hit as hard as Tommy managed to knock him down in his prime with far less punches. Not once did I say that styles were the ONLY thing that matters. GTFO with your nonsense.
ONE MORE OC THOSE R ON DRUGS. FOREMAN 2 SLOW 4 IRON MIKE.
Foreman ate smaller fighter like Frazer and Ken Norton for breakfast...He just pushed and closed them down, broke their rhythm, smothered them with the left and destroyed them, Tyson would go down in around 4 rounds and never wake up...Foreman only lost in his prime due to hot conditions and gassing, just a monster....Tyson couldn't beat Lennox or Holyfield, overrated he only fought retired fork lift drivers in his "Prime"...Yet he said after Prison he was in his best shape, Lewis was older than Tyson and demolished him....
Yep, Tyson was bling and overrated, good fighter but Foreman was on another level of brutal, and powerful with a tough chin..
@@roamingwildcampers2745nope not in days weak to hard shots
joe fought in a straight line
moved head to much and up and down
threw jabs and straight hooks
did 2 punch combos
Tyson fought in a straight line bkut once close punched from angles
moved head around not just simple like joe
didnt throw much jabs
threw wide hooks
jumped into punches when he was a distance from the person
mike did this
tyson would dodge while doin combos joe didnt do that ether
did 4 or 5 punch combos mike did this
joe fought from close range
mike was mid range
mike was a counter puncher
joe wasnt a counter puncher he was a ducking and then punch take 1 and give one
Not similar at all see how you shouldn't repeat quotes other followes who dont watch say so you had no reason to say a joe vs george match as it made no sense to compare
@@ascendediamyou wrote a senseless essay.....Tyson himself said " No way I would fight that monster!!!"..And Tyson's beloved smart trainer who built him up said- "It's SUICIDE against Foreman if you're short and fight a swarming attacking style like Marciano or Frazier," - Cus D’Amato ...Who did Tyson beat..? Did he beat Lennox Lewis who was 1 year older than him ? Did he beat Holyfield who was 4 years older than him? You are sucked into the hype....Tyson was a great boxer but up against Foreman as the vast majority of professional boxers and trainers have stated in this videos and elsewhere even Tyson himself, TYSON WOULD LOSE...
@@Namdor2012 the young george def was weaker then his old ver u can see he had no real def in his young days
dwight fought like a better def version of dwight used head movement and angles so if joe used that same style he could have put down george
followers got mutiple points which was shown to be flawed
george height is advantage
pushes means he dominates
his power was to much
uppercuts and iabs keep take a person out fast
swammers lose fast
dwight showed if joe used the same defense he would have beat george cause I told u young george couldnt take damage even close to the old ver
and dwight was a better swammer then joe didnt used his block good u have to use angles to make George wide punches miss and he made him miss often and dwight blocked often joe didnt show these same def skills
they never bring up dwight and act like the match never happened he showed that dumb flawed quote of all swammers lose is crap and folks still say it I dont know why
dwight only lost cause he was tired he did better then joes both matches
dwight only lost cause he was tired he was winning rounds
george said for dwight
he said he had trouble hittin him
even tho george was taller then him and used the jabs another advantage yall say works for george
dwight showed height and coming in like joe did didnt matter
tom showed punches wide like tyson and hitting quick punches would show a effect on George
mike fought Smith who was slow and strong like George u weird people will say but he wasnt strong as George why do that matter as if if he had been as strong he would land no cause he was still slow
why is it everytime we make the point of who mike fought that was comparable to George like smith and trever who did pushes yall say it's wrong when it's on video showing trever did pushes and smith was slow and strong like George
but when yall say the blind quote of mike was like joe even tho they fought nothing alike that's right its hypocritical
why would mike who had the best defense of all time in hw lose to George and mike fought smith who was strong but faster then frank and frank was almost as slow as George and almost as strong and neither one could hit mike much so why would George
another proof is berbick which I exposed George wouldnt be able to keep doing that to keep space berbick abused it keep getting countered George was slower then berbick
dwight style like joe but better defense
ali and jim fast punchers and defense
frank real slow and almost as George
smith slow and strong
all people who show George would lose to mike if if nothing like I told u nobody to name who show George would even hit mike often
And no it wouldn't be anything like a joe or ken match cause mine fought nothing like them so why say that makes no sense see how you shouldn't repeat silly quotes you read like the man told you he was nothing like Joe so why keep saying it its on video all you have to do is watch
So no it he wouldnt win try watching these matches to bad you people who pretend to be blind and slow cant admit the truth
You cant go over this breakdown of the matches cause its all true so your wrong and you had no reason to say that george would best a person he wouldn't even land on enough or one that gave Mike trouble
Mike had trouble with rangy fighters who fought from range who had lateral movement who had good hand speed and who had good defense
They even say in the trever match which I described thats not the way to fight him he came nonstop forward
Wasnt that the exact same way george fought? He didn't fight off the jab or use any lateral movement while fighting from distance you dont have to like it but its fact geoege would lose off of the breakdown and even said by the commentaries like I said
Mike wasnt joe his weaknesses wasnt a uppercut that he just kept running through especially not a slow easy to read one from a person as slow as george it was like I said a person who fought from range and who used good lateral movement
BIG GEORGE!!!
Loses yea I know
BIG GEOEGE!!!
If Cus was in the corner with Tyson I believe Tyson would have took him out to sleep.
Why wouldn't u george was slow and easy to read never would land much
@@cmoneytheman Tyson would never beat foreman
@SpannerzIsHappy the young george def was weaker then his old ver u can see he had no real def in his young days
dwight fought like a better def version of dwight used head movement and angles so if joe used that same style he could have put down george
followers got mutiple points which was shown to be flawed
george height is advantage
pushes means he dominates
his power was to much
uppercuts and iabs keep take a person out fast
swammers lose fast
dwight showed if joe used the same defense he would have beat george cause I told u young george couldnt take damage even close to the old ver
and dwight was a better swammer then joe didnt used his block good u have to use angles to make George wide punches miss and he made him miss often and dwight blocked often joe didnt show these same def skills
they never bring up dwight and act like the match never happened he showed that dumb flawed quote of all swammers lose is crap and folks still say it I dont know why
dwight only lost cause he was tired he did better then joes both matches
dwight only lost cause he was tired he was winning rounds
george said for dwight
he said he had trouble hittin him
even tho george was taller then him and used the jabs another advantage yall say works for george
dwight showed height and coming in like joe did didnt matter
tom showed punches wide like tyson and hitting quick punches would show a effect on George
mike fought Smith who was slow and strong like George u weird people will say but he wasnt strong as George why do that matter as if if he had been as strong he would land no cause he was still slow
why is it everytime we make the point of who mike fought that was comparable to George like smith and trever who did pushes yall say it's wrong when it's on video showing trever did pushes and smith was slow and strong like George
but when yall say the blind quote of mike was like joe even tho they fought nothing alike that's right its hypocritical
why would mike who had the best defense of all time in hw lose to George and mike fought smith who was strong but faster then frank and frank was almost as slow as George and almost as strong and neither one could hit mike much so why would George
another proof is berbick which I exposed George wouldnt be able to keep doing that to keep space berbick abused it keep getting countered George was slower then berbick
dwight style like joe but better defense
ali and jim fast punchers and defense
frank real slow and almost as George
smith slow and strong
all people who show George would lose to mike if if nothing like I told u nobody to name who show George would even hit mike often
And no it wouldn't be anything like a joe or ken match cause mine fought nothing like them so why say that makes no sense see how you shouldn't repeat silly quotes you read like the man told you he was nothing like Joe so why keep saying it its on video all you have to do is watch
So no it he wouldnt win try watching these matches nothing to do with height
@@ascendediam Cope harder
@@cmoneytheman Foreman beats Tyson
A reason why ali told foremen to avoid tyson
No cus'd amato knew Foreman what annihilate tyson coming in with those lethal uppercuts
And Foreman had the superior chin and get off the canvas to win a fight look at Lyle's fight against Ali Foreman lost due to exhaustion no cause he was seriously hurt
tyson never gets off the canvas to win a fight not ever
@@earth7551 😅
@@cardosuxxxxxx
U agree I know 👍👍
@@earth7551 left out Ron who hurt George 1st round with the first strong punch,and mike never got off the floor since he had to be hit mutiple times just to get their the man was ungodly tough,you slow follower
@@ascendediam what the hell are talking about tyson never won a fight after getting his ass knocked down even against journeyman
that's what I mean Foreman got up like a gladiator to k.o Ron out
tyson just can't overcome such things he quits
George foreman would make easy work of Mike Tyson
the young george def was weaker then his old ver u can see he had no real def in his young days
dwight fought like a better def version of dwight used head movement and angles so if joe used that same style he could have put down george
followers got mutiple points which was shown to be flawed
george height is advantage
pushes means he dominates
his power was to much
uppercuts and iabs keep take a person out fast
swammers lose fast
dwight showed if joe used the same defense he would have beat george cause I told u young george couldnt take damage even close to the old ver
and dwight was a better swammer then joe didnt used his block good u have to use angles to make George wide punches miss and he made him miss often and dwight blocked often joe didnt show these same def skills
they never bring up dwight and act like the match never happened heshowed that dumb flawed quote of all swammers lose is crap and folks still say it I dont know why
dwight only lost cause he was tired he did better then joes both matches
dwight only lost cause he was tired he was winning rounds
george said for dwight
he said he had trouble hittin him
even tho george was taller then him and used the jabs another advantage yall say works for george
dwight showed height and coming in like joe did didnt matter
tom showed punches wide like tyson and hitting quick punches would show a effect on George
mike fought Smith who was slow and strong like George u weird people will say but he wasnt strong as George why do that matter as if if he had been as strong he would land no cause he was still slow
why is it everytime we make the point of who mike fought that was comparable to George like smith and trever who did pushes yall say it's wrong when it's on video showing trever did pushes and smith was slow and strong like George
but when yall say the dumb blind quote of mike was like joe even though they fought nothing alike that's right its hypocritical
why would mike who had the best defense of all time in hw lose to George and mike fought smith who was strong but faster then frank and frank was almost as slow as George and almost as strong and neither one could hit mike much so why would George
another proof is berbick which I exposed George wouldnt be able to keep doing that to keep space berbick abused it keep getting countered George was slower then berbick
dwight style like joe but better defense
ali and jim fast punchers and defense
frank real slow and almost as George
smith slow and strong
all people who show George would lose to mike if if nothing like I told u nobody to name who show George would even hit mike often
See how you shouldn't repeat quotes that make no sense next time watch before you speak
Tyson ran from Foreman. He was terrified of him.
Wrong dumb follower that's a myth
They both are intimidating as hell, but I see George pushing back Mike with both of his tree trunk arms not allowing Mike to get close to unleash his combo. I see a push or two and a sledge hammer jab with a cross that will send Mike in a another dimension. Same fate as Joe Frazier. but end will come even quicker because Mike wouldn’t keep getting up to get beaten up some more.
the young george def was weaker then his old ver u can see he had no real def in his young days
dwight fought like a better def version of dwight used head movement and angles so if joe used that same style he could have put down george
followers got mutiple points which was shown to be flawed
george height is advantage
pushes means he dominates
his power was to much
uppercuts and iabs keep take a person out fast
swammers lose fast
dwight showed if joe used the same defense he would have beat george cause I told u young george couldnt take damage even close to the old ver
and dwight was a better swammer then joe didnt used his block good u have to use angles to make George wide punches miss and he made him miss often and dwight blocked often joe didnt show these same def skills
they never bring up dwight and act like the match never happened he showed that dumb flawed quote of all swammers lose is crap and folks still say it I dont know why
dwight only lost cause he was tired he did better then joes both matches
dwight only lost cause he was tired he was winning rounds
george said for dwight
he said he had trouble hittin him
even tho george was taller then him and used the jabs another advantage they say works for george
dwight showed height and coming in like joe did didnt matter
tom showed punches wide like tyson and hitting quick punches would show a effect on George
mike fought Smith who was slow and strong like George u weird people will say but he wasnt strong as George why do that matter as if if he had been as strong he would land no cause he was still slow
why is it everytime we make the point of who mike fought that was comparable to George like smith and trever who did pushes yall say it's wrong when it's on video showing trever did pushes and smith was slow and strong like George
but when yall say the blind quote of mike was like joe even tho they fought nothing alike that's right its hypocritical
why would mike who had the best defense of all time for his style in hw lose to George and mike fought smith who was strong but faster then frank and frank was almost as slow as George and almost as strong and neither one could hit mike much so why would George
another proof is berbick which I exposed George wouldnt be able to keep doing that to keep space berbick abused it keep getting countered George was slower then berbick
dwight style like joe but better defense
ali and jim fast punchers and defense
frank real slow and almost as George
smith slow and strong
Mike had trouble with rangy fighters who fought from range who had lateral movement who had good hand speed and who had good defense
They even say in the trever match which I described thats not the way to fight him he came nonstop forward
Wasnt that the exact same way george fought? He didn't fight off the jab or use any lateral movement while fighting from distance george would lose off of the breakdown and even said by the commentaries like I said
Mike wasnt joe his weaknesses wasnt a uppercut that he just kept running through especially not a slow easy to read one from a person as slow as george it was like I said a person who fought from range and who used good lateral movement
Nobody has anybody George fought that can compare to mike so how is it they said he would beat Mike where does it come from its based off of nothing which is odd😊
George by 9 or 10 round KO.
George by 9th or 10th round KO.
I think Foreman would win
@@cmoneytheman foreman
No foreman
Foreman
@@jonhlisa7182 tyson
Foreman 💯
Mike Tyson my all time favorite. That being said George Foreman is one of the toughest strongest men to ever walk the face of the earth. Both in prime could go either way. Older Foreman gets beat by decision. Morrison took Foreman the distance and same as Holyfield.
tyson would drop foreman like holmes
If u come to your conclusion based on how George beat Frazier then ur way off the mark.
joe fought in a straight line
moved head to much and up and down
threw jabs and straight hooks
did 2 punch combos
Tyson fought in a straight line bkut once close punched from angles
moved head around not just simple like joe
didnt throw much jabs
threw wide hooks
jumped into punches when he was a distance from the person
mike did this
tyson would dodge while doin combos joe didnt do that ether
did 4 or 5 punch combos mike did this
joe fought from close range
mike was mid range
mike was a counter puncher
joe wasnt a counter puncher he was a ducking and then punch take 1 and give one
Not similar at all,followers who dont watch have said that lie for years,yet we had video of both proving they fought nothing alike so why have followers still repeated that odd lie for years how they fought alike
the young george def was weaker than his old ver u can see he had no real def in his young days
another proof is berbick which I exposed George wouldn't be able to keep doing that to keep space berbick abused it keep getting countered George was slower than berbick
Mike had trouble with rangy fighters who fought from range who had lateral movement who had good hand speed and who had good defense
They even say in the trever match which I described that's not the way to fight him he came nonstop forward
Wasn't that the exact same way george fought? He didn't fight off the jab or use any lateral movement while fighting from distance george would lose off of the breakdown and even said by the commentaries like I said
Mike wasnt joe his weaknesses wasnt a uppercut that he just kept running through especially not a slow easy to read one from a person as slow as george it was like I said a person who fought from range and who used good lateral movement
foreman all wrong for mike,
u mean mike was for him
George foreman’s mummy style would’ve completely snuffed out Tyson’s LIGHTING like attacks. A lot of people don’t pay attention to his strategy but he completely prevents attacks from ever happening because of the the way he throws people around and shoved at their arms, and foreman is stronger than Tyson. I’m imagining Tyson shifting off line at jump speed for his death combo but then Foreman grabs Tyson and throws him right back onto center line and then rips his guard open and sends him to the shadow realm.
the young george def was weaker then his old ver u can see he had no real def in his young days
dwight fought like a better def version of dwight used head movement and angles so if joe used that same style he could have put down george
followers got mutiple points which was shown to be flawed
george height is advantage
pushes means he dominates
his power was to much
uppercuts and iabs keep take a person out fast
swammers lose fast
dwight showed if joe used the same defense he would have beat george cause I told u young george couldnt take damage even close to the old ver
and dwight was a better swammer then joe didnt used his block good u have to use angles to make George wide punches miss and he made him miss often and dwight blocked often joe didnt show these same def skills
they never bring up dwight and act like the match never happened he showed that dumb flawed quote of all swammers lose is crap and folks still say it I dont know why
dwight only lost cause he was tired he did better then joes both matches
dwight only lost cause he was tired he was winning rounds
george said for dwight
he said he had trouble hittin him
even tho george was taller then him and used the jabs another advantage yall say works for george
dwight showed height and coming in like joe did didnt matter
tom showed punches wide like tyson and hitting quick punches would show a effect on George
mike fought Smith who was slow and strong like George u weird people will say but he wasnt strong as George why do that matter as if if he had been as strong he would land no cause he was still slow
why is it everytime we make the point of who mike fought that was comparable to George like smith and trever who did pushes yall say it's wrong when it's on video showing trever did pushes and smith was slow and strong like George
but when yall say the blind quote of mike was like joe even tho they fought nothing alike that's right its hypocritical
why would mike who had the best defense of all time in hw lose to George and mike fought smith who was strong but faster then frank and frank was almost as slow as George and almost as strong and neither one could hit mike much so why would George
another proof is berbick which I exposed George wouldnt be able to keep doing that to keep space berbick abused it keep getting countered George was slower then berbick
dwight style like joe but better defense
ali and jim fast punchers and defense
frank real slow and almost as George
smith slow and strong
all people who show George would lose to mike if if nothing like I told u nobody to name who show George would even hit mike often
And no it wouldn't be anything like a joe or ken match cause mine fought nothing like them so why say that makes no sense see how you shouldn't repeat silly quotes you read like the man told you he was nothing like Joe so why keep saying it its on video all you have to do is watch
So no it he wouldnt win try watching these matches to bad you people who pretend to be blind and slow cant admit the truth
You cant go over this breakdown of the matches cause its all true so your wrong and you had no reason to say that george would best a person he wouldn't even land on enough or one that gave Mike trouble
Mike had trouble with rangy fighters who fought from range who had lateral movement who had good hand speed and who had good defense
They even say in the trever match which I described thats not the way to fight him he came nonstop forward
Wasnt that the exact same way george fought? He didn't fight off the jab or use any lateral movement while fighting from distance you dont have to like it but its fact geoege would lose off of the breakdown and even said by the commentaries like I said
Mike wasnt joe his weaknesses wasnt a uppercut that he just kept running through especially not a slow easy to read one from a person as slow as george it was like I said a person who fought from range and who used good lateral movement
Tysons style wouldnt do so well against foreman, he'd have to tire foreman out then go inside and win. But theres a small chance of that happening
the young george def was weaker then his old ver u can see he had no real def in his young days
tom showed punches wide like tyson and hitting quick punches would show a effect on George
mike fought Smith who was slow and strong like George u weird people will say but he wasnt strong as George why do that matter as if if he had been as strong he would land no cause he was still slow
why is it everytime we make the point of who mike fought that was comparable to George like smith and trever who did pushes yall say it's wrong when it's on video showing trever did pushes and smith was slow and strong like George
but when yall say the blind quote of mike was like joe even tho they fought nothing alike that's right its hypocritical
why would mike who had the best defense at the time in hw lose to George and mike fought smith who was strong but faster then frank and frank was almost as slow as George and almost as strong and neither one could hit mike much so why would George
another proof is berbick which I exposed George wouldnt be able to keep doing that to keep space berbick abused it keep getting countered George was slower then berbick
Mike had trouble with rangy fighters who fought from range who had lateral movement who had good hand speed and who had good defense
They even say in the trever match which I described thats not the way to fight him he came nonstop forward
Wasnt that the exact same way george fought? He didn't fight off the jab or use any lateral movement while fighting from distance george would lose off of the breakdown and even said by the commentaries like I said
Mike wasnt joe his weaknesses wasnt a uppercut that he just kept running through especially not a slow easy to read one from a person as slow as george it was like I said a person who fought from range and who used good lateral movement
Nobody has anybody George fought that can compare to mike so how is it they said he would beat Mike where does it come from its based off of nothing which is odd
Tyson will go unanime decision against foreman.
@@simonemiglioli1165 ko 1st round foreman was to basic and slow
@@ascendediam🤣🤣🤣🤣😂😂🤣🤣🤣
@@ascendediamMike went the distance against much weaker opponents but of course he knocked out an estimated top 10 heavyweight in just one round who had never been knocked out in his career. Tyson fan boys are hilarious 🤣🤣😂🤣🤣😂
What would Tyson do differently than Joe Frazier in a fight with Foreman? Unless he did something drastically different, it would be the same result that Frasier got.
you can't compare bruce lee with sammo hung....
@@KIDhot247that's a troll follower who never seen either
joe fought in a straight line
moved head to much and up and down
threw jabs and straight hooks
did 2 punch combos
Tyson fought in a straight line bkut once close punched from angles
moved head around not just simple like joe
didnt throw much jabs
threw wide hooks
jumped into punches when he was a distance from the person
mike did this
tyson would dodge while doin combos joe didnt do that ether
did 4 or 5 punch combos mike did this
joe fought from close range
mike was mid range
mike was a counter puncher
joe wasnt a counter puncher he was a ducking and then punch take 1 and give one
Not similar at all see how you shouldn't repeat quotes other followes who dont watch say so you had no reason to say a joe vs george match as it made no sense to compare
@@ascendediam it's just an honest question, I didn't repeat any quotes. I've seen Mike Tyson's fights. But I haven't watched Joe Frazier's fights nearly as much, mainly just his losses to George Foreman. If Tyson fought Foreman, he would have to get past that defense. Foreman just held Frasier back and bombed away.
@@gregjohnston455 joe fought in a straight line
moved head to much and up and down
threw jabs and straight hooks
did 2 punch combos
Tyson fought in a straight line bkut once close punched from angles
moved head around not just simple like joe
didnt throw much jabs
threw wide hooks
jumped into punches when he was a distance from the person
mike did this
tyson would dodge while doin combos joe didnt do that ether
did 4 or 5 punch combos mike did this
joe fought from close range
mike was mid range
mike was a counter puncher
joe wasnt a counter puncher he was a ducking and then punch take 1 and give one
It's always been odd to even compare the 2 since they fought nothing alike
Joe honestly looks very basic and flawed his whole era does compared to 80s
How can anyone be picking George Foreman for this.
George Foreman was beat by Muhammad Ali.
Mike Tyson is just as fast as Muhammad Ali and has even more moves and harder punches than Muhammad Ali.
I picked Mike Tyson to win over George Foreman all day long.
Cause they crazy is why he wouldnt land punches to slow and sloopy
Steve H ...Tyson wasn't faster than Ali. Explain!
george foreman .
weird
The Mike Tyson that beat Trevor berbick versus prime George Foreman you got to go with prime Mike
the young george def was weaker then his old ver u can see he had no real def in his young days
dwight fought like a better def version of dwight used head movement and angles so if joe used that same style he could have put down george
followers got mutiple points which was shown to be flawed
george height is advantage
pushes means he dominates
his power was to much
uppercuts and iabs keep take a person out fast
swammers lose fast
dwight showed if joe used the same defense he would have beat george cause I told u young george couldnt take damage even close to the old ver
and dwight was a better swammer then joe didnt used his block good u have to use angles to make George wide punches miss and he made him miss often and dwight blocked often joe didnt show these same def skills
they never bring up dwight and act like the match never happened he showed that dumb flawed quote of all swammers lose is crap and folks still say it I dont know why
dwight only lost cause he was tired he did better then joes both matches
dwight only lost cause he was tired he was winning rounds
george said for dwight
he said he had trouble hittin him
even tho george was taller then him and used the jabs another advantage they say works for george
dwight showed height and coming in like joe did didnt matter
tom showed punches wide like tyson and hitting quick punches would show a effect on George
mike fought Smith who was slow and strong like George weird people will say but he wasnt strong as George why do that matter as if if he had been as strong he would land no cause he was still slow
why is it everytime we make the point of who mike fought that was comparable to George like smith and trever who did pushes yall say it's wrong when it's on video showing trever did pushes and smith was slow and strong like George
but when they say the blind quote of mike was like joe even tho they fought nothing alike that's right its hypocritical
why would mike who had the best defense of all time in hw lose to George and mike fought smith who was strong but faster then frank and frank was almost as slow as George and almost as strong and neither one could hit mike much so why would George
another proof is berbick which I exposed George wouldnt be able to keep doing that to keep space berbick abused it keep getting countered George was slower then berbick
dwight style like joe but better defense
ali and jim fast punchers and defense
frank real slow and almost as George
smith slow and strong
Mike had trouble with rangy fighters who fought from range who had lateral movement who had good hand speed and who had good defense
They even say in the trever match which I described thats not the way to fight him he came nonstop forward
Wasnt that the exact same way george fought? He didn't fight off the jab or use any lateral movement while fighting from distance george would lose off of the breakdown and even said by the commentaries like I said
Mike wasnt joe his weaknesses wasnt a uppercut that he just kept running through especially not a slow easy to read one from a person as slow as george it was like I said a person who fought from range and who used good lateral movement
Nobody has anybody George fought that can compare to mike so how is it they said he would beat Mike where does it come from its based off of nothing which is odd
I believe Mike tyson would destroy anyone in his prime
@@cmoneytheman because foreman timed his hits, look at him and frazier everytime frazier ducked under he would be hit with an uppercut or something similar, floyd patterson had the peek a boo style mastered better than tyson, tyson just had more power and look what happened to patterson when he fought liston (george's sparring partner)
@@cmoneytheman styles make fights, foreman was a slugger, tyson was a swarmer, you should know sluggers counter swarmers
@@cmoneytheman and you got that backwards, Mike always threw straights, jabs, etc and frazier threw hooks and where did I say Mike and floyd were exactly the same?, I made a point saying sluggers beat swarmers, please elaborate on where/how I said they were the same?
@@jayembrown5395 because foreman timed his hits, look at him and frazier everytime frazier ducked under he would be hit with an uppercut or something similar, floyd patterson had the peek a boo style mastered better than tyson, tyson just had more power and look what happened to patterson when he fought liston (george's sparring partner)
@@jayembrown5395 because foreman timed his hits, look at him and frazier everytime frazier ducked under he would be hit with an uppercut or something similar, floyd patterson had the peek a boo style mastered better than tyson, tyson just had more power and look what happened to patterson when he fought liston (george's sparring partner)
George Edward Foreman, Sr. would have knocked out Michael Gerald Tyson, inside of two rounds at the most, PERIOD!!!
George Edward Foreman, Sr would have knocked out Michael Gerald Tyson, inside of two rounds at the most by knockout.
how would George win if he wouldnt land crazy idiot
@Bruce Scott ...Well, well, well!!! LOL!!! cmoneytheman, the ultimate Tysonite, trying convince me and the rest of the boxing world about Big George versus Iron Mike. You already know my answer! You're not a boxing historian. So, why are you wasting your time! Dont you have something else better to do?
@Bruce Scott ...Well, well, well!!! LOL!!! cmoneytheman, the ultimate Tysonite, trying convince me and the rest of the boxing world about Big George versus Iron Mike. You already know my answer! You're not a boxing historian. So, why are you wasting your time! Dont you have something else better to do?
@Bruce Scott ...Well, well, well!!! LOL!!! cmoneytheman, the ultimate Tysonite, trying convince me and the rest of the boxing world about Big George versus Iron Mike. You already know my answer! You're not a boxing historian. So, why are you wasting your time! Dont you have something else better to do?
George is the best ever
That’s if Foreman could hit Tyson…
the young george def was weaker then his old ver u can see he had no real def in his young days
dwight fought like a better def version of dwight used head movement and angles so if joe used that same style he could have put down george
followers got mutiple points which was shown to be flawed
george height is advantage
pushes means he dominates
his power was to much
uppercuts and iabs keep take a person out fast
swammers lose fast
dwight showed if joe used the same defense he would have beat george cause I told u young george couldnt take damage even close to the old ver
and dwight was a better swammer then joe didnt used his block good u have to use angles to make George wide punches miss and he made him miss often and dwight blocked often joe didnt show these same def skills
they never bring up dwight and act like the match never happened he showed that dumb flawed quote of all swammers lose is crap and folks still say it I dont know why
dwight only lost cause he was tired he did better then joes both matches
dwight only lost cause he was tired he was winning rounds
george said for dwight
he said he had trouble hittin him
even tho george was taller then him and used the jabs another advantage yall say works for george
dwight showed height and coming in like joe did didnt matter
tom showed punches wide like tyson and hitting quick punches would show a effect on George
mike fought Smith who was slow and strong like George u weird people will say but he wasnt strong as George why do that matter as if if he had been as strong he would land no cause he was still slow
why is it everytime we make the point of who mike fought that was comparable to George like smith and trever who did pushes yall say it's wrong when it's on video showing trever did pushes and smith was slow and strong like George
but when yall say the blind quote of mike was like joe even tho they fought nothing alike that's right its hypocritical
why would mike who had the best defense of all time in hw lose to George and mike fought smith who was strong but faster then frank and frank was almost as slow as George and almost as strong and neither one could hit mike much so why would George
another proof is berbick which I exposed George wouldnt be able to keep doing that to keep space berbick abused it keep getting countered George was slower then berbick
dwight style like joe but better defense
ali and jim fast punchers and defense
frank real slow and almost as George
smith slow and strong
Look it up all these matches since you like to keep repeating quotes that make no sense
joe fought in a straight line
moved head to much and up and down
threw jabs and straight hooks
did 2 punch combos
Tyson fought in a straight line bkut once close punched from angles
moved head around not just simple like joe
didnt throw much jabs
threw wide hooks
jumped into punches when he was a distance from the person
mike did this
tyson would dodge while doin combos joe didnt do that ether
did 4 or 5 punch combos mike did this
joe fought from close range
mike was mid range
mike was a counter puncher
joe wasnt a counter puncher he was a ducking and then punch take 1 and give one
Foreman wins
the young george def was weaker then his old ver u can see he had no real def in his young days
dwight fought like a better def version of dwight used head movement and angles so if joe used that same style he could have put down george
followers got mutiple points which was shown to be flawed
george height is advantage
pushes means he dominates
his power was to much
uppercuts and iabs keep take a person out fast
swammers lose fast
dwight showed if joe used the same defense he would have beat george cause I told u young george couldnt take damage even close to the old ver
and dwight was a better swammer then joe didnt used his block good u have to use angles to make George wide punches miss and he made him miss often and dwight blocked often joe didnt show these same def skills
they never bring up dwight and act like the match never happened he showed that dumb flawed quote of all swammers lose is crap and folks still say it I dont know why
dwight only lost cause he was tired he did better then joes both matches
dwight only lost cause he was tired he was winning rounds
george said for dwight
he said he had trouble hittin him
even tho george was taller then him and used the jabs another advantage yall say works for george
dwight showed height and coming in like joe did didnt matter
tom showed punches wide like tyson and hitting quick punches would show a effect on George
mike fought Smith who was slow and strong like George u weird people will say but he wasnt strong as George why do that matter as if if he had been as strong he would land no cause he was still slow
why is it everytime we make the point of who mike fought that was comparable to George like smith and trever who did pushes yall say it's wrong when it's on video showing trever did pushes and smith was slow and strong like George
but when yall say the blind quote of mike was like joe even tho they fought nothing alike that's right its hypocritical
why would mike who had one of the best defense of all time in hw lose to George and mike fought smith who was strong but faster then frank and frank was almost as slow as George and almost as strong and neither one could hit mike much so why would George
another proof is berbick which I exposed George wouldnt be able to keep doing that to keep space berbick abused it keep getting countered George was slower then berbick
And no it wouldn't be anything like a joe match cause mike fought nothing like him
So no mike wouldnt lose it was stupid of you to say that watch matches
Prime Tyson has a chance for sure...must get KO by round 3-4.Otherwise Foreman.
wrong Mike wins it is no chance
@Dynamite stop trolling idiot both was to slow and easy to ready stop saying dumb stuff you read online
Mike was a terror in his prime but if anyone had the right style to beat him it would be big George. He was just too strong and was such a heavy hitter that I think he had the perfect style to beat any of the "swarming" fighters, (Marciano, Frazier, Tyson, Dempsey) and he could take a punch too if Mike did land. There's a Foreman fight here on youtube of a fighter (I can't remember who) who was fighting a post Norton Foreman and in his corner he said to his trainers "you gotta stop this, this guy is going to put me in the hospital"
the young george def was weaker then his old ver u can see he had no real def in his young days
dwight fought like a better def version of dwight used head movement and angles so if joe used that same style he could have put down george
followers got mutiple points which was shown to be flawed
george height is advantage
pushes means he dominates
his power was to much
uppercuts and iabs keep take a person out fast
swammers lose fast
dwight showed if joe used the same defense he would have beat george cause I told u young george couldnt take damage even close to the old ver
and dwight was a better swammer then joe didnt used his block good u have to use angles to make George wide punches miss and he made him miss often and dwight blocked often joe didnt show these same def skills
they never bring up dwight and act like the match never happened he showed that dumb flawed quote of all swammers lose is crap and folks still say it I dont know why
dwight only lost cause he was tired he did better then joes both matches
dwight only lost cause he was tired he was winning rounds
george said for dwight
he said he had trouble hittin him
even tho george was taller then him and used the jabs another advantage yall say works for george
dwight showed height and coming in like joe did didnt matter
tom showed punches wide like tyson and hitting quick punches would show a effect on George
mike fought Smith who was slow and strong like George u weird people will say but he wasnt strong as George why do that matter as if if he had been as strong he would land no cause he was still slow
why is it everytime we make the point of who mike fought that was comparable to George like smith and trever who did pushes yall say it's wrong when it's on video showing trever did pushes and smith was slow and strong like George
but when yall say the blind quote of mike was like joe even tho they fought nothing alike that's right its hypocritical
why would mike who had the best defense of all time in hw lose to George and mike fought smith who was strong but faster then frank and frank was almost as slow as George and almost as strong and neither one could hit mike much so why would George
another proof is berbick which I exposed George wouldnt be able to keep doing that to keep space berbick abused it keep getting countered George was slower then berbick
dwight style like joe but better defense
ali and jim fast punchers and defense
frank real slow and almost as George
smith slow and strong
all people who show George would lose to mike if if nothing like I told u nobody to name who show George would even hit mike often
And no it wouldn't be anything like a joe or ken match cause mine fought nothing like them so why say that makes no sense see how you shouldn't repeat silly quotes you read like the man told you he was nothing like Joe so why keep saying it its on video all you have to do is watch
So no it he wouldnt win try watching these matches to bad you people who pretend to be blind and slow cant admit the truth
You cant go over this breakdown of the matches cause its all true so your wrong and you had no reason to say that george would best a person he wouldn't even land on enough or one that gave Mike trouble
Mike had trouble with rangy fighters who fought from range who had lateral movement who had good hand speed and who had good defense
They even say in the trever match which I described thats not the way to fight him he came nonstop forward
Wasnt that the exact same way george fought? He didn't fight off the jab or use any lateral movement while fighting from distance you dont have to like it but its fact geoege would lose off of the breakdown and even said by the commentaries like I said
Mike wasnt joe his weaknesses wasnt a uppercut that he just kept running through especially not a slow easy to read one from a person as slow as george it was like I said a person who fought from range and who used good lateral movement
Anyone that picks Tyson over Foreman don't know boxing
the young george def was weaker then his old ver u can see he had no real def in his young days
dwight fought like a better def version of dwight used head movement and angles so if joe used that same style he could have put down george
followers got mutiple points which was shown to be flawed
george height is advantage
pushes means he dominates
his power was to much
uppercuts and iabs keep take a person out fast
swammers lose fast
dwight showed if joe used the same defense he would have beat george cause I told u young george couldnt take damage even close to the old ver
and dwight was a better swammer then joe didnt used his block good u have to use angles to make George wide punches miss and he made him miss often and dwight blocked often joe didnt show these same def skills
they never bring up dwight and act like the match never happened he showed that dumb flawed quote of all swammers lose is crap and folks still say it I dont know why
dwight only lost cause he was tired he did better then joes both matches
dwight only lost cause he was tired he was winning rounds
george said for dwight
he said he had trouble hittin him
even tho george was taller then him and used the jabs another advantage yall say works for george
dwight showed height and coming in like joe did didnt matter
tom showed punches wide like tyson and hitting quick punches would show a effect on George
mike fought Smith who was slow and strong like George u weird people will say but he wasnt strong as George why do that matter as if if he had been as strong he would land no cause he was still slow
why is it everytime we make the point of who mike fought that was comparable to George like smith and trever who did pushes yall say it's wrong when it's on video showing trever did pushes and smith was slow and strong like George
but when yall say the blind quote of mike was like joe even tho they fought nothing alike that's right its hypocritical
why would mike who had one of the best defense of all time in hw lose to George and mike fought smith who was strong but faster then frank and frank was almost as slow as George and almost as strong and neither one could hit mike much so why would George
another proof is berbick which I exposed George wouldnt be able to keep doing that to keep space berbick abused it keep getting countered George was slower then berbick
And no it wouldn't be anything like a joe match cause mike fought nothing like him
So no anybody who picks george needs to watch the matches i said
Big G all the way
to lose yea
@@cmoneytheman George would win easily, even Cus knew that. Stop riding Tyson already
@@jwjxhdjxsns how would he win dummy and no cus didnt say that stop being dumb already
@@jwjxhdjxsns George would win easily, even Cus knew that. Stop riding Tyson already