I wish I could speak biblical language ( Greek-Hebrew ) as fluent as you do! Also retaining what you learn is a blessing, that’s why I like listening to you
As someone who believes tongues are languages, I am opposed to the interpretation you arrive of acts 2 that says Peter gave an interpretation of the tongues that were being spoken, I believe he gave an explanation of what was happening and why these unlearned people are speaking these different languages. I think to say Peter was giving an interpretation of the words that were being uttered is not right, because it's already said that everyone that was present heard their own language and heard that was was being said was Praises to God, therefore there would be no need for interpretation of the said language or tongue but an exposition of the event.
You are correct... He's too sure of his own head knowledge. Peter was simply teaching the crowd and shining light on this "new thing." The uniqueness of the tongues in that moment was specifically given by the Lord as an in the moment sign to the hearers... Thus, all that they were uttering was specifically spoken in all of the languages present... bearing witness of the one True God. Interpretation of tongues, as I understand, is done by the same one who spoke the tongue... and it is accomplished in the same manner as the tongue spoken -- without thought. The one who spoke the tongue then immediately speaks, in their own language, words of understanding without giving thought to what you will say. You just speak and the words are given to you by the holy spirit within you. Thus, the interpreter doesn't know what the Interpretation will be until the moment he/she gives utterance -- thats what i mean when say "without thought." It's not some pre-planned statement. It's purpose is for the believers present in the very moment and for their edification. Again, the one who spoke the tongues out loud in the gathering of believers is the same one who then immediately utters the interpretation.
That is one, very likely possibility. There is however, the possibility that there were others who did not understand what the apostles were saying. Ergo, the mockers said “they are drunk.” To say that Peter was translating and to say the he was explaining why the apostle were giving praises are not very different interpretations. It very likely that he was doing both.
Why would the Jews who were unbelievers need an interpretation hearing the words of their own language? It makes zero spiritual sense to say these Holy Spirit filled people were plainly speaking the Hebrew tongue.
@user-fu2ec1os9s Remember, in Mark, Christ said that one of the signs that will accomp those who believe is speaking in new tongues... Thus, the fulfilling of his words in their presence by those who followed him and were his disciples... Seeing other people of different languages bear witness to the men speaking about God... the God of Israel... was a witness to the Jews. These unlearned Gallileans SUDDENLY speaking in all these different languages bearing witness of God of Israel... the One True God. That's what it was for. Furthermore, the tongue spoken was NOT guaranteed to be Hebrew at all... in fact, it was not understood by the speaker, so it certainly would not have been Hebrew they would have spoken.
Actually interpretation started back in Genesis with Joseph and dreams and also spoke about in Daniel for the same subject. It is a gift of the spirit. ”For the prophecy came not in old time by the will of man: but holy men of God spake as they were moved by the Holy Ghost.“ 2 Peter 1:21 KJV Genesis 41:15 15 Pharaoh said to Joseph, “I had a dream, and no one can interpret it. But I have heard it said of you that when you hear a dream you can interpret Daniel 2:36 36 “This was the dream, and now we will interpret it to the king.
We would deffer there my good Sir, at least this time. On the what you say was being done by Peter: he was not giving an interpretation, the people around had heard already what was being said. He was simply explaining to the Jews that, basically to help them understand "prophetical time-lines", if I may say. Remember that Joel is giving a detailed prophecy, and then he says; "afterwards" then this will happen, "before" the dreadful day of the Lord. Basically he is saying this marks the beginning of the end, helping the Jews to also not only remember the words of Joel but of Isaiah 11:28 I believe. But as for the content of what they were saying, it was clear to everyone, there was no need of further interpretation. Thanks for your always helpful content Sir, God bless you.
1. What does the word interpretation mean? It means explain 2. What does it look like? Can you point to an example of this gift in the Bible other than Acts 2? No. 3. Do we have any other Spiritual gifts where there is no example of it in the Bible? No. After Peter explains why this is happening (Joel 2), what is he speaking about? He states what Jesus has done (The Gospel). Which is what happened earlier in tongues/languages. 4. What was the result of Peter’s explanation? The church was added to. To disagree you would have to conclude their earlier to tongues were empty words and not about the gospel, that They weren’t doing what Jesus said they would do, and that what Peter said was not directly related.
In Acts 10 Peter said that Cornelius received the Holy Ghost just as they have. The sign displayed by Peter and the others was speaking in tongues of a natural language. How else could he have made the connection if it where not a natural language? Acts 10:46-47 (KJV) For they heard them speak with tongues, and magnify God. Then answered Peter, Can any man forbid water, that these should not be baptized, which have received the Holy Ghost as well as we?
@@smartchristiansGod bless you brother Corey. They were recognizing the fact that the saints were speaking in their native languages. Even if some of them were bilingual, it still would not have been the gift of interpreting tongues, because the gifts are work by the Spirit. The men that were visiting had not received Christ until after Peter spoke; so they didn’t have the Holy Spirit yet.
What is the best translation of the Bible. I attended a class where the teacher said the KJV is the worst of all translations because King James had an agenda. I disagree. What are your thoughts, Min. Corey?
Corey uses the ESV I think. But regardless, the ESV is definitely a very good one. Don't fall for the hype that the KJV is the best. It is not a bad one but there are KJV purists who think anyone who doesn't use that translation is akin to a demon 😂😂
Hey. I've been attending Sanctuary Church in Longwood. Tomorrow I am visiting Journey Church in Fern Park..I just started my search for churches journey too. River of Life was also recommended to me which is in Orlando.
@@cierrahp9702 ”And in the same house remain, eating and drinking such things as they give: for the labourer is worthy of his hire. Go not from house to house.“ Luke 10:7 KJV
@@QueenLadySummer329 thanks for the Tip. Spent some time in seminary, and I lead my family through the Bible. I'm looking for a church or Bible following ministry.
Peter was simply teaching the crowd and shining light on this "new thing." The uniqueness of the tongues in that moment was specifically given by the Lord as an in the moment sign to the hearers... Thus, all that they were uttering was specifically spoken in all of the languages present... bearing witness of the one True God. Interpretation of tongues, as I understand, is done by the same one who spoke the tongue... and it is accomplished in the same manner as the tongue spoken -- without thought. The one who spoke the tongue then immediately speaks, in their own language, words of understanding without giving thought to what you will say. You just speak and the words are given to you by the holy spirit within you. Thus, the interpreter doesn't know what the Interpretation will be until the moment he/she gives utterance -- thats what i mean when say "without thought." It's not some pre-planned statement. It's purpose is for the believers present in the very moment and for their edification. Again, the one who spoke the tongues out loud in the gathering of believers is the same one who then immediately utters the interpretation.
@kgar5String He who prophesies is greater than one who speaks in tongues, unless he interprets, so that the church may be edified” (1 Corinthians 14:5). Operating the manifestation of prophecy (forth telling) is seen as greater than the one who ONLY speaks in tongues WITHOUT interpretation because no one understands the tongues (in most every case)... except he (the one who spoke in tongues) ALSO interprets because then the present hearers are edifices because the interpretation is in the understood language If another person stands and claims to operate the manifestation of interpretation of tongues of ANOTHER person they are false or, if genuinely from the holy spirit, they are operating the manifestation of interpretation of tongues, rather, they are giving a Word of prophecy. Of Note and good to remember... speaking in tongues was a sign to unbelievers not for believers. If you have an assembly of all believers, then someone giving a Word of Prophecy (again forth telling NOT foretelling in most cases) suffices because every there is a believer and does not need the sign of Speaking in tongues.
There seems to be also ONE example of “Interpretation of Tongues” in the Old Testament, with Daniel at Belshazzar’s feast. There seemed to be a tongue written on the wall, that Daniel had to interpret and give the meaning of.
Nobody can interpret gibberish, Acts 2:4-8 tongues is a knowable human language. Like with most other things the Pentecostals are wrong. Paul rebukes the pagan counterfeit (estatic utterances) in 1 Corinthians 14.
@hayeschrist1 that's not correct, angels always spoke in human languages, Paul is using hyperbolic language in that verse, again the point stands nobody can interpret gibberish so if the church follows his guidelines in chapter 14 it will solve the issue. That was what Paul was trying to do, to put the kibosh on the chaos.
@hayeschrist1 I believe in tongues but what the Pentecostals are doing today isn't it. Lucado is a woke false teacher who affirms Mormons and Trans people as "Children of God". Not a good example.
@hayeschrist1Pray for the interpretations of languages not gibberish. When Paul speaks of you guess of angels, he isn’t speaking literally of a “heavenly language”, as some want to believe, but is using a hyperbolic expression. Hyperbole is an exaggeration to make a point. Paul is saying that, no matter how gifted one may be, whether in in own language, in foreign languages, or in even in the hypothetical speech of angels, it’s all moot without love. The fact is that Paul used hyperbolic language elsewhere including in the very next verse, with his mention of faith “to remove mountains.” His exaggerations serve to emphasize the necessity of love. Showing love is more important than the grandest, most miraculous action imaginable. Here we are fighting for the ability to show our selves as special God servant’s where God’s inspired scripture is not information we need than what he gave us.
The gift of prophesying is to give a revelation to read scriptures? Only you don't have to have a gift to read the Bible. Joel Korytko is a Greek scholar who says James White was wrong in his debate with Flowers but you think James was right that John writes Greek In code.
I would pay better attention. I never agreed with White’s point that he was making in the Greek that was erroneous. Which has nothing to do with this video
I get more out of reading that context of the Bible in English than you do out of reading in the original languages. Point. Reading in the original languages doesn't give you any more authority and necessarily more insight than a person who can read the English text of the Bible. It is just as easy to misread from the original languages OUT of context as it is from the English bible OUT of context or as you do, to impose your own context and predilections on the text. For someone who says they run a channel aimed at getting christians to think, I hope Christians take the cue to apply this first to your expositions of the Bible and think about why your interpretations are not correct.
He gave an explanation to what he believes the passages are saying, if you don’t agree you can’t just say he’s incorrect, tell why you disagree and give an explanation so that we all can be edified.
@@BibleTruthChannel Where do I start? Let's just say Corey claims to be a "continuationist" but his interpretations and the consequences of everything he teaches are cessationist. He is not a continuationist. He doesn't even understand the gift of Interpretation of tongues that Paul speaks of in 1 Corinthians. This figures because he wrongly interprets tongues as human languages despite the overwhelming evidence from Paul's cues in the letter that they are NOT human languages and he hast to twist scripture within an inch of its life to make it read otherwise. "speaks not to men (not human languages) but to God, utters mysteries in the Spirit" he just can't take a hint. Interpretation of tongues is necessary because tongues are a spiritual language to God or from God, normatively they are not the miraculous ability to speak human languages you have never learned. God can do that, but it is not normative and Acts 2 was not a normative experience or Paul might have mentioned the cloven tongues of fire and the interpretation of human languages in 1 Corinthians. Are they 2 different gifts, that might be one alternative, but not one I subscribe to. So yes, I would charge Corey with NOT taking the full context of 1 Corinthians into account in arriving at his teaching about what tongues is or is not in the Bible. Its pointless to take this to him though because though he profusely denies it, he is uninterested in taking up this argument. I am over trying with him, so I am just now making comments like this to hopefully get people to think about why his interpretations might be wrong, because they are.
@@BibleTruthChannel Yes, you are right, I can say I don't agree. I can also say that there are very good contextual reasons for not agreeing. I can also point out that people watching this video should question it and point out some of the reasons why they should question it. Because, if you are a "thinking Christian" you should not just accept what I say or what he says as being true, you should have a look at all sides and develop reasons for your own conclusions, which you should be able to make an account of following the spirit of 1 Peter 3:15. You shouldn't think "Oh, Corey is using the original languages of the Bible, which I don't know, so he must be an authority" Christians need to question any authority in a positive and engaging manner. I don't believe Corey is genuinely doing this, dispite his claims to the contrary. What he does with that charge, I leave up to him, but I note that other commentators have made simmilar comments in regards to this video. I genuinely welcome people to question the things I put up on my channel and I respond to them. I believe you might know this from experience as I believe I have spoken to you before.
He is incorrect because he is talking about spiritual things but doesn’t realize these two things are connected. He started with interpretation and said it was only found in one place, right away those with spiritual ears and discernment recognize his errors. Interpretation has to do with dreams which is found first in Genesis with Joseph and also in Daniel 2 and 4 which has to do with Joel 2, and that goes back to Babel (when the languages were confounded and the nations scattered) and forward to Acts 2, where they were no longer confounded and were hearing from and speaking as the Holy Ghost gave them utterance. Jesus remove the partition. Because of Jesus we have direct access to the Father and can communicate with him just as the prophets of old did. Psalm 126 Isaiah 11:11 ”Then Peter opened his mouth, and said, Of a truth I perceive that God is no respecter of persons: but in every nation he that feareth him, and worketh righteousness, is accepted with him. The word which God sent unto the children of Israel, preaching peace by Jesus Christ: (he is Lord of all:) that word, I say, ye know, which was published throughout all Judæa, and began from Galilee, after the baptism which John preached; how God anointed Jesus of Nazareth with the Holy Ghost and with power: who went about doing good, and healing all that were oppressed of the devil; for God was with him. And we are witnesses of all things which he did both in the land of the Jews, and in Jerusalem; whom they slew and hanged on a tree: him God raised up the third day, and shewed him openly; not to all the people, but unto witnesses chosen before of God, even to us, who did eat and drink with him after he rose from the dead. And he commanded us to preach unto the people, and to testify that it is he which was ordained of God to be the Judge of quick and dead. To him give all the prophets witness, that through his name whosoever believeth in him shall receive remission of sins.“ Acts 10:34-43 KJV ”Now there are diversities of gifts, but the same Spirit. And there are differences of administrations, but the same Lord. And there are diversities of operations, but it is the same God which worketh all in all. But the manifestation of the Spirit is given to every man to profit withal. For to one is given by the Spirit the word of wisdom; to another the word of knowledge by the same Spirit; to another faith by the same Spirit; to another the gifts of healing by the same Spirit; to another the working of miracles; to another prophecy; to another discerning of spirits; to another divers kinds of tongues; to another the interpretation of tongues: but all these worketh that one and the selfsame Spirit, dividing to every man severally as he will. For as the body is one, and hath many members, and all the members of that one body, being many, are one body: so also is Christ. For by one Spirit are we all baptized into one body, whether we be Jews or Gentiles, whether we be bond or free; and have been all made to drink into one Spirit. For the body is not one member, but many.“ 1 Corinthians 12:4-14 KJV And it doesn’t say to the “whole body,” as he said but it says “maketh increase of the body [singular] unto the edifying of itself in love. Its just one body which is Christ’s, singular. ”But unto every one of us is given grace according to the measure of the gift of Christ. Wherefore he saith, When he ascended up on high, he led captivity captive, And gave gifts unto men. (Now that he ascended, what is it but that he also descended first into the lower parts of the earth? He that descended is the same also that ascended up far above all heavens, that he might fill all things.) And he gave some, apostles; and some, prophets; and some, evangelists; and some, pastors and teachers; for the perfecting of the saints, for the work of the ministry, for the edifying of the body of Christ: till we all come in the unity of the faith, and of the knowledge of the Son of God, unto a perfect man, unto the measure of the stature of the fulness of Christ: that we henceforth be no more children, tossed to and fro, and carried about with every wind of doctrine, by the sleight of men, and cunning craftiness, whereby they lie in wait to deceive; but speaking the truth in love, may grow up into him in all things, which is the head, even Christ: from whom the whole body fitly joined together and compacted by that which every joint supplieth, according to the effectual working in the measure of every part, maketh increase of the body unto the edifying of itself in love.“ Ephesians 4:7-16 KJV
You NEVER pray over those who follow you... you NEVER prophesy over them... You NEVER ask them, How's their Spirit... So you could teach them how to overcome the World... 💔 Who makes us a Disciple?? GOD Does!!! NOT man... ❤ who is a Prophet Subject too?? Other Prophets... I tried reaching out to you but it fell on death ears... God Bless You and your Family and this Ministry... You need to make some changes... Amen!!! ❤🙏🏼 Be Blessed by the HolySpirit of Truth!!! GLORY be to GOD!!! 🎉🎉🎉 REPENT and be Born from Above!!! Amen!!!
Men become so smart when they go to school or have books and computers smh What does the Holy Spirit say about the gifts? If all we were left with was the Bible how would you ever understand the word of god? It is not by the natural but the supernatural who is god that explains himself and his word. I think there’s a scripture about the wisdom of men and how god feels about it .. lolo yeah I know there are a few.. let me get the BIBLE an actual book bound in leather with pages that you turn with your hand and find them
While you are in the Bible, which I believe my examples were from the Bible, could you find either 1. A text that disproves the point I made or 2. An example of interpretation of tongues in the Bible.
@@smartchristians side note .. another terrible example of circle logic is suggesting the soldiers were not overtaken by the spirit of the lord and thus fell back because they didn’t have the spirit … how can you possibly come to that conclusion? If God is all powerful he can make anyone anywhere anytime fall back. If you encounter the lord I trust you will fall back, fall down, be overcome .. Every knee will bow.. how could you or I or anyone not be?! He is God! but even so, Saul didn’t have the holy spirt he was murdering and persecuting Christians.. and he was knocked off that horse how do you reconcile that event with the same theory applied to the soldiers? Impossible. The conclusion has to be they encountered the spirit of the living god who was Jesus and fell down either by compulsion or in unconscious uncontrollable reverence
In Acts 2, the disciples had stammering lips and spoke in other tongues, or languages as prophesied by Isaiah. It is not uncommon for those who are baptized with the Holy Spirit to speak in tongues and prophesy. In prophesying they magnify God by inspiration of the Spirit, and so is the case in Acts 2, except they prophesied in the languages of the hearers. So it is written, With stammering lips and another tongue will I speak unto this people... Isaiah 28:11. There was no interpretation of tongues, seeing that the interpretation of tongues is strictly for the edifying of the body of Christ, and those hearers on that day were not of the body. Moreover, not all interpret, and not all speak in tongues as a gift of the Spirit according to Acts 12.
Show us 1 other person who thinks Peter has the gift of interpretation? You're the only person. Just whatever you want to twist to fit your narrative manipulator manipulator
@@smartchristians I don't believe there is 1 that is my point. It's up to the person making the claim to prove with evidence the claim they are making. People don't just assume there are pink unicorns until someone proves them wrong. You believe that there are active participles that means a real believer. They enter into a continual state of believing. There are no such things in the greek. John is not using code when you believe that is believing the active participle.
You are attempting to cover various topics at once. Stick to one topic. To answer your comment on the Greek, your understanding is erroneous. Perhaps you will listen to one of the foremost authorities in Greek Daniel Wallace. In his discussion of the active participle's use in grammar, he covers John 3:16 and the use of the participle "beliving" / πιστεύων "Greek Grammar Beyond the Basics" by Daniel Wallace John 3:16 πᾶς ὁ πιστεύων The idea seems to be both gnomic and continual: “everyone who continually believes.” This is not due to the present tense only, but to the [p. 621] use of the present participle of πιστεύω, especially in soteriological contexts in the NT.22 22 The aspectual force of the present ὁ πιστεύων seems to be in contrast with ὁ πιστεύσας. The aorist is used only eight times (plus two in the longer ending of Mark). The aorist is sometimes used to describe believers as such and thus has a generic force (cf. for the clearest example the v.l. at Mark 16:16; cf. also 2 Thess 1:10; Heb 4:3; perhaps John 7:39; also, negatively, of those who did not [μή] believe: 2 Thess 2:12; Jude 5). The present occurs six times as often (43 times), most often in soteriological contexts (cf. John 1:12; 3:15, 16, 18; 3:36; 6:35, 47, 64; 7:38; 11:25; 12:46; Acts 2:44; 10:43; 13:39; Rom 1:16; 3:22; 4:11, 24; 9:33; 10:4, 11; 1 Cor 1:21; 14:22 [bis]; Gal 3:22; Eph 1:19; 1 Thess 1:7; 2:10, 13; 1 Pet 2:6, 7; 1 John 5:1, 5, 10, 13). Thus, it seems that since the aorist participle was a live option to describe a “believer,” it is unlikely that when the present was used, it was aspectually flat. The present was the tense of choice most likely because the NT writers by and large saw continual belief as a necessary condition of salvation. Along these lines, it seems significant that the promise of salvation is almost always given to ὁ πιστεύων (cf. several of the above-cited texts), almost never to ὁ πιστεύσας (apart from Mark 16:16, John 7:39 and Heb 4:3 come the closest [the present tense of πιστεύω never occurs in Hebrews]).
@@smartchristians I have 3 comments you responded to so I have more than 1 topic to cover. Is there any evidence that Peter has the gift of interpretation besides your wanting it to be there?
@@Jesus_is_God77is there any evidence that ANYONE in the Bible had that gift. Other than this example we don’t have one. You are trying to prove that isn’t what interpretation looks like but you don’t have an example of what else it may look like.
I wish I could speak biblical language ( Greek-Hebrew ) as fluent as you do! Also retaining what you learn is a blessing, that’s why I like listening to you
As someone who believes tongues are languages, I am opposed to the interpretation you arrive of acts 2 that says Peter gave an interpretation of the tongues that were being spoken, I believe he gave an explanation of what was happening and why these unlearned people are speaking these different languages. I think to say Peter was giving an interpretation of the words that were being uttered is not right, because it's already said that everyone that was present heard their own language and heard that was was being said was Praises to God, therefore there would be no need for interpretation of the said language or tongue but an exposition of the event.
You are correct...
He's too sure of his own head knowledge.
Peter was simply teaching the crowd and shining light on this "new thing."
The uniqueness of the tongues in that moment was specifically given by the Lord as an in the moment sign to the hearers...
Thus, all that they were uttering was specifically spoken in all of the languages present... bearing witness of the one True God.
Interpretation of tongues, as I understand, is done by the same one who spoke the tongue... and it is accomplished in the same manner as the tongue spoken -- without thought.
The one who spoke the tongue then immediately speaks, in their own language, words of understanding without giving thought to what you will say. You just speak and the words are given to you by the holy spirit within you.
Thus, the interpreter doesn't know what the Interpretation will be until the moment he/she gives utterance -- thats what i mean when say "without thought." It's not some pre-planned statement.
It's purpose is for the believers present in the very moment and for their edification.
Again, the one who spoke the tongues out loud in the gathering of believers is the same one who then immediately utters the interpretation.
That is one, very likely possibility.
There is however, the possibility that there were others who did not understand what the apostles were saying. Ergo, the mockers said “they are drunk.” To say that Peter was translating and to say the he was explaining why the apostle were giving praises are not very different interpretations. It very likely that he was doing both.
Do you have knowledge somewhere else other than your head? Are you saying we should be More stupid?
Why would the Jews who were unbelievers need an interpretation hearing the words of their own language?
It makes zero spiritual sense to say these Holy Spirit filled people were plainly speaking the Hebrew tongue.
@user-fu2ec1os9s
Remember, in Mark, Christ said that one of the signs that will accomp those who believe is speaking in new tongues...
Thus, the fulfilling of his words in their presence by those who followed him and were his disciples...
Seeing other people of different languages bear witness to the men speaking about God... the God of Israel... was a witness to the Jews. These unlearned Gallileans SUDDENLY speaking in all these different languages bearing witness of God of Israel... the One True God.
That's what it was for.
Furthermore, the tongue spoken was NOT guaranteed to be Hebrew at all... in fact, it was not understood by the speaker, so it certainly would not have been Hebrew they would have spoken.
ACTS chapter 2 / Joel chapter 2
Peter refers to what Joel said.
Actually interpretation started back in Genesis with Joseph and dreams and also spoke about in Daniel for the same subject. It is a gift of the spirit.
”For the prophecy came not in old time by the will of man: but holy men of God spake as they were moved by the Holy Ghost.“
2 Peter 1:21 KJV
Genesis 41:15
15 Pharaoh said to Joseph, “I had a dream, and no one can interpret it. But I have heard it said of you that when you hear a dream you can interpret
Daniel 2:36
36 “This was the dream, and now we will interpret it to the king.
Amen and Amen
NKJ bible is complete knowledge to live righteous / without intersection of tongues . ❤ ✌
KJV is only authorized bible, all the others are trash
Bro Corey, would you say that it was the Apostles only on that day of Pentecost who were speaking in these languages?
No, the text says it was ordinary diasporan Jews who had come to Jerusalem for the Passover from different parts of the Roman Empire.
We would deffer there my good Sir, at least this time. On the what you say was being done by Peter: he was not giving an interpretation, the people around had heard already what was being said. He was simply explaining to the Jews that, basically to help them understand "prophetical time-lines", if I may say. Remember that Joel is giving a detailed prophecy, and then he says; "afterwards" then this will happen, "before" the dreadful day of the Lord. Basically he is saying this marks the beginning of the end, helping the Jews to also not only remember the words of Joel but of Isaiah 11:28 I believe. But as for the content of what they were saying, it was clear to everyone, there was no need of further interpretation.
Thanks for your always helpful content Sir, God bless you.
My apologies for my poor grammar, but I hope the message is clear.
1. What does the word interpretation mean? It means explain 2. What does it look like? Can you point to an example of this gift in the Bible other than Acts 2? No. 3. Do we have any other Spiritual gifts where there is no example of it in the Bible? No. After Peter explains why this is happening (Joel 2), what is he speaking about? He states what Jesus has done (The Gospel). Which is what happened earlier in tongues/languages.
4. What was the result of Peter’s explanation? The church was added to. To disagree you would have to conclude their earlier to tongues were empty words and not about the gospel, that They weren’t doing what Jesus said they would do, and that what Peter said was not directly related.
In Acts 10 Peter said that Cornelius received the Holy Ghost just as they have. The sign displayed by Peter and the others was speaking in tongues of a natural language. How else could he have made the connection if it where not a natural language?
Acts 10:46-47 (KJV) For they heard them speak with tongues, and magnify God. Then answered Peter,
Can any man forbid water, that these should not be baptized, which have received the Holy Ghost as well as we?
Interpretation spelled incorrectly on thumbnail.
The gift of the interpretation of tongues works by the Spirit of God, but the men that were visiting, knew their native languages naturally.
Wouldn’t interpretation be in their native language?
@@smartchristiansGod bless you brother Corey. They were recognizing the fact that the saints were speaking in their native languages. Even if some of them were bilingual, it still would not have been the gift of interpreting tongues, because the gifts are work by the Spirit. The men that were visiting had not received Christ until after Peter spoke; so they didn’t have the Holy Spirit yet.
@@letgodbetrue8864bingo
You believe Paul was using the word prophesy like reading scriptures. As if you need the gift of prophesying to read the Bible. You understand right?
What is the best translation of the Bible. I attended a class where the teacher said the KJV is the worst of all translations because King James had an agenda. I disagree. What are your thoughts, Min. Corey?
KJV is the best translation
Corey uses the ESV I think. But regardless, the ESV is definitely a very good one. Don't fall for the hype that the KJV is the best. It is not a bad one but there are KJV purists who think anyone who doesn't use that translation is akin to a demon 😂😂
After doing my own research of this matter, all other versions of the KJB are corrupted, even the NKJV.
Looking for help finding a church in the Orlando area... if anyone can recommend.
Read your Bible.
Hey. I've been attending Sanctuary Church in Longwood. Tomorrow I am visiting Journey Church in Fern Park..I just started my search for churches journey too. River of Life was also recommended to me which is in Orlando.
@@cierrahp9702 ”And in the same house remain, eating and drinking such things as they give: for the labourer is worthy of his hire. Go not from house to house.“
Luke 10:7 KJV
@@QueenLadySummer329 thanks for the Tip. Spent some time in seminary, and I lead my family through the Bible.
I'm looking for a church or Bible following ministry.
@@cierrahp9702 thank you!! I'll look those churches up. I'm trying to avoid the mega churches and tongue babbling
Peter was simply teaching the crowd and shining light on this "new thing."
The uniqueness of the tongues in that moment was specifically given by the Lord as an in the moment sign to the hearers...
Thus, all that they were uttering was specifically spoken in all of the languages present... bearing witness of the one True God.
Interpretation of tongues, as I understand, is done by the same one who spoke the tongue... and it is accomplished in the same manner as the tongue spoken -- without thought.
The one who spoke the tongue then immediately speaks, in their own language, words of understanding without giving thought to what you will say. You just speak and the words are given to you by the holy spirit within you.
Thus, the interpreter doesn't know what the Interpretation will be until the moment he/she gives utterance -- thats what i mean when say "without thought." It's not some pre-planned statement.
It's purpose is for the believers present in the very moment and for their edification.
Again, the one who spoke the tongues out loud in the gathering of believers is the same one who then immediately utters the interpretation.
No where in the scripture do you read the one speaking in tongues is the one that interprets you added that.
@kgar5String
He who prophesies is greater than one who speaks in tongues, unless he interprets, so that the church may be edified” (1 Corinthians 14:5).
Operating the manifestation of prophecy (forth telling) is seen as greater than the one who ONLY speaks in tongues WITHOUT interpretation because no one understands the tongues (in most every case)... except he (the one who spoke in tongues) ALSO interprets because then the present hearers are edifices because the interpretation is in the understood language
If another person stands and claims to operate the manifestation of interpretation of tongues of ANOTHER person they are false or, if genuinely from the holy spirit, they are operating the manifestation of interpretation of tongues, rather, they are giving a Word of prophecy.
Of Note and good to remember... speaking in tongues was a sign to unbelievers not for believers. If you have an assembly of all believers, then someone giving a Word of Prophecy (again forth telling NOT foretelling in most cases) suffices because every there is a believer and does not need the sign of Speaking in tongues.
I don't have a problem with Corey I have a problem with false doctrine.
Read Acts 2
There seems to be also ONE example of “Interpretation of Tongues” in the Old Testament, with Daniel at Belshazzar’s feast.
There seemed to be a tongue written on the wall, that Daniel had to interpret and give the meaning of.
How Is It? People Can't Understand. PAUL Made It Abundantly CLEAR..
Please Understand What "Edification" Means. CHRIST Is Not DIVIDED! 12:19 AMEN!
Nobody can interpret gibberish, Acts 2:4-8 tongues is a knowable human language. Like with most other things the Pentecostals are wrong. Paul rebukes the pagan counterfeit (estatic utterances) in 1 Corinthians 14.
@hayeschrist1 that's not correct, angels always spoke in human languages, Paul is using hyperbolic language in that verse, again the point stands nobody can interpret gibberish so if the church follows his guidelines in chapter 14 it will solve the issue. That was what Paul was trying to do, to put the kibosh on the chaos.
@hayeschrist1 I don't know what language they are speaking but whatever it is it's not gibberish like Benny Hinn and Kenneth Copeland do.
@hayeschrist1 I believe in tongues but what the Pentecostals are doing today isn't it. Lucado is a woke false teacher who affirms Mormons and Trans people as "Children of God". Not a good example.
@hayeschrist1 are you seriously comparing smoking a cigar with affirming a false gospel? You need to examine yourself my friend.
@hayeschrist1Pray for the interpretations of languages not gibberish. When Paul speaks of you guess of angels, he isn’t speaking literally of a “heavenly language”, as some want to believe, but is using a hyperbolic expression. Hyperbole is an exaggeration to make a point. Paul is saying that, no matter how gifted one may be, whether in in own language, in foreign languages, or in even in the hypothetical speech of angels, it’s all moot without love. The fact is that Paul used hyperbolic language elsewhere including in the very next verse, with his mention of faith “to remove mountains.” His exaggerations serve to emphasize the necessity of love. Showing love is more important than the grandest, most miraculous action imaginable. Here we are fighting for the ability to show our selves as special God servant’s where God’s inspired scripture is not information we need than what he gave us.
Corey Minor IUIC wants to debate you !!!
The gift of prophesying is to give a revelation to read scriptures? Only you don't have to have a gift to read the Bible. Joel Korytko is a Greek scholar who says James White was wrong in his debate with Flowers but you think James was right that John writes Greek In code.
I would pay better attention. I never agreed with White’s point that he was making in the Greek that was erroneous. Which has nothing to do with this video
I get more out of reading that context of the Bible in English than you do out of reading in the original languages. Point. Reading in the original languages doesn't give you any more authority and necessarily more insight than a person who can read the English text of the Bible. It is just as easy to misread from the original languages OUT of context as it is from the English bible OUT of context or as you do, to impose your own context and predilections on the text. For someone who says they run a channel aimed at getting christians to think, I hope Christians take the cue to apply this first to your expositions of the Bible and think about why your interpretations are not correct.
So what did he speak out of context?
He gave an explanation to what he believes the passages are saying, if you don’t agree you can’t just say he’s incorrect, tell why you disagree and give an explanation so that we all can be edified.
@@BibleTruthChannel Where do I start? Let's just say Corey claims to be a "continuationist" but his interpretations and the consequences of everything he teaches are cessationist. He is not a continuationist. He doesn't even understand the gift of Interpretation of tongues that Paul speaks of in 1 Corinthians. This figures because he wrongly interprets tongues as human languages despite the overwhelming evidence from Paul's cues in the letter that they are NOT human languages and he hast to twist scripture within an inch of its life to make it read otherwise. "speaks not to men (not human languages) but to God, utters mysteries in the Spirit" he just can't take a hint. Interpretation of tongues is necessary because tongues are a spiritual language to God or from God, normatively they are not the miraculous ability to speak human languages you have never learned. God can do that, but it is not normative and Acts 2 was not a normative experience or Paul might have mentioned the cloven tongues of fire and the interpretation of human languages in 1 Corinthians. Are they 2 different gifts, that might be one alternative, but not one I subscribe to. So yes, I would charge Corey with NOT taking the full context of 1 Corinthians into account in arriving at his teaching about what tongues is or is not in the Bible. Its pointless to take this to him though because though he profusely denies it, he is uninterested in taking up this argument. I am over trying with him, so I am just now making comments like this to hopefully get people to think about why his interpretations might be wrong, because they are.
@@BibleTruthChannel Yes, you are right, I can say I don't agree. I can also say that there are very good contextual reasons for not agreeing. I can also point out that people watching this video should question it and point out some of the reasons why they should question it. Because, if you are a "thinking Christian" you should not just accept what I say or what he says as being true, you should have a look at all sides and develop reasons for your own conclusions, which you should be able to make an account of following the spirit of 1 Peter 3:15. You shouldn't think "Oh, Corey is using the original languages of the Bible, which I don't know, so he must be an authority" Christians need to question any authority in a positive and engaging manner. I don't believe Corey is genuinely doing this, dispite his claims to the contrary. What he does with that charge, I leave up to him, but I note that other commentators have made simmilar comments in regards to this video. I genuinely welcome people to question the things I put up on my channel and I respond to them. I believe you might know this from experience as I believe I have spoken to you before.
He is incorrect because he is talking about spiritual things but doesn’t realize these two things are connected. He started with interpretation and said it was only found in one place, right away those with spiritual ears and discernment recognize his errors. Interpretation has to do with dreams which is found first in Genesis with Joseph and also in Daniel 2 and 4 which has to do with Joel 2, and that goes back to Babel (when the languages were confounded and the nations scattered) and forward to Acts 2, where they were no longer confounded and were hearing from and speaking as the Holy Ghost gave them utterance. Jesus remove the partition. Because of Jesus we have direct access to the Father and can communicate with him just as the prophets of old did.
Psalm 126
Isaiah 11:11
”Then Peter opened his mouth, and said, Of a truth I perceive that God is no respecter of persons: but in every nation he that feareth him, and worketh righteousness, is accepted with him. The word which God sent unto the children of Israel, preaching peace by Jesus Christ: (he is Lord of all:) that word, I say, ye know, which was published throughout all Judæa, and began from Galilee, after the baptism which John preached; how God anointed Jesus of Nazareth with the Holy Ghost and with power: who went about doing good, and healing all that were oppressed of the devil; for God was with him. And we are witnesses of all things which he did both in the land of the Jews, and in Jerusalem; whom they slew and hanged on a tree: him God raised up the third day, and shewed him openly; not to all the people, but unto witnesses chosen before of God, even to us, who did eat and drink with him after he rose from the dead. And he commanded us to preach unto the people, and to testify that it is he which was ordained of God to be the Judge of quick and dead. To him give all the prophets witness, that through his name whosoever believeth in him shall receive remission of sins.“
Acts 10:34-43 KJV
”Now there are diversities of gifts, but the same Spirit. And there are differences of administrations, but the same Lord. And there are diversities of operations, but it is the same God which worketh all in all. But the manifestation of the Spirit is given to every man to profit withal. For to one is given by the Spirit the word of wisdom; to another the word of knowledge by the same Spirit; to another faith by the same Spirit; to another the gifts of healing by the same Spirit; to another the working of miracles; to another prophecy; to another discerning of spirits; to another divers kinds of tongues; to another the interpretation of tongues: but all these worketh that one and the selfsame Spirit, dividing to every man severally as he will. For as the body is one, and hath many members, and all the members of that one body, being many, are one body: so also is Christ. For by one Spirit are we all baptized into one body, whether we be Jews or Gentiles, whether we be bond or free; and have been all made to drink into one Spirit. For the body is not one member, but many.“
1 Corinthians 12:4-14 KJV
And it doesn’t say to the “whole body,” as he said but it says “maketh increase of the body [singular] unto the edifying of itself in love. Its just one body which is Christ’s, singular.
”But unto every one of us is given grace according to the measure of the gift of Christ. Wherefore he saith, When he ascended up on high, he led captivity captive, And gave gifts unto men. (Now that he ascended, what is it but that he also descended first into the lower parts of the earth? He that descended is the same also that ascended up far above all heavens, that he might fill all things.) And he gave some, apostles; and some, prophets; and some, evangelists; and some, pastors and teachers; for the perfecting of the saints, for the work of the ministry, for the edifying of the body of Christ: till we all come in the unity of the faith, and of the knowledge of the Son of God, unto a perfect man, unto the measure of the stature of the fulness of Christ: that we henceforth be no more children, tossed to and fro, and carried about with every wind of doctrine, by the sleight of men, and cunning craftiness, whereby they lie in wait to deceive; but speaking the truth in love, may grow up into him in all things, which is the head, even Christ: from whom the whole body fitly joined together and compacted by that which every joint supplieth, according to the effectual working in the measure of every part, maketh increase of the body unto the edifying of itself in love.“
Ephesians 4:7-16 KJV
You NEVER pray over those who follow you... you NEVER prophesy over them... You NEVER ask them, How's their Spirit... So you could teach them how to overcome the World... 💔
Who makes us a Disciple?? GOD Does!!! NOT man... ❤ who is a Prophet Subject too?? Other Prophets... I tried reaching out to you but it fell on death ears...
God Bless You and your Family and this Ministry... You need to make some changes... Amen!!! ❤🙏🏼 Be Blessed by the HolySpirit of Truth!!! GLORY be to GOD!!! 🎉🎉🎉 REPENT and be Born from Above!!! Amen!!!
Men become so smart when they go to school or have books and computers smh
What does the Holy Spirit say about the gifts? If all we were left with was the Bible how would you ever understand the word of god? It is not by the natural but the supernatural who is god that explains himself and his word.
I think there’s a scripture about the wisdom of men and how god feels about it .. lolo yeah I know there are a few.. let me get the BIBLE an actual book bound in leather with pages that you turn with your hand and find them
While you are in the Bible, which I believe my examples were from the Bible, could you find either 1. A text that disproves the point I made or 2. An example of interpretation of tongues in the Bible.
@@smartchristians side note .. another terrible example of circle logic is suggesting the soldiers were not overtaken by the spirit of the lord and thus fell back because they didn’t have the spirit … how can you possibly come to that conclusion? If God is all powerful he can make anyone anywhere anytime fall back. If you encounter the lord I trust you will fall back, fall down, be overcome .. Every knee will bow.. how could you or I or anyone not be?! He is God! but even so, Saul didn’t have the holy spirt he was murdering and persecuting Christians.. and he was knocked off that horse how do you reconcile that event with the same theory applied to the soldiers? Impossible.
The conclusion has to be they encountered the spirit of the living god who was Jesus and fell down either by compulsion or in unconscious uncontrollable reverence
Dr. Brown will say otherwise
You listen to Dr. Brown?
@@kgar5String yes, how about you?
In Acts 2, the disciples had stammering lips and spoke in other tongues, or languages as prophesied by Isaiah.
It is not uncommon for those who are baptized with the Holy Spirit to speak in tongues and prophesy. In prophesying they magnify God by inspiration of the Spirit, and so is the case in Acts 2, except they prophesied in the languages of the hearers.
So it is written, With stammering lips and another tongue will I speak unto this people... Isaiah 28:11.
There was no interpretation of tongues, seeing that the interpretation of tongues is strictly for the edifying of the body of Christ, and those hearers on that day were not of the body. Moreover, not all interpret, and not all speak in tongues as a gift of the Spirit according to Acts 12.
This brother is wayyyyy wrong. He has NO God given understanding pertaining to interpretation of tongues. It’s obvious.
Please give your understanding. Give us a Biblical example of Interpretation.
Please give us an example
The Tribe of Gad
Jahdo = Caddo
Ahi = Yaqui
Jews are the so called black people.
Hebrews have no negroid blood.
Show us 1 other person who thinks Peter has the gift of interpretation? You're the only person. Just whatever you want to twist to fit your narrative manipulator manipulator
Rather than just blocking a rude and insulting individual, I’ll simply ask you to give a BIBLICAL example of someone interpreting.
@@smartchristians I don't believe there is 1 that is my point. It's up to the person making the claim to prove with evidence the claim they are making. People don't just assume there are pink unicorns until someone proves them wrong. You believe that there are active participles that means a real believer. They enter into a continual state of believing. There are no such things in the greek. John is not using code when you believe that is believing the active participle.
You are attempting to cover various topics at once. Stick to one topic. To answer your comment on the Greek, your understanding is erroneous. Perhaps you will listen to one of the foremost authorities in Greek Daniel Wallace. In his discussion of the active participle's use in grammar, he covers John 3:16 and the use of the participle "beliving" / πιστεύων
"Greek Grammar Beyond the Basics" by Daniel Wallace
John 3:16 πᾶς ὁ πιστεύων
The idea seems to be both gnomic and continual: “everyone who continually believes.” This is not due to the present tense only, but to the [p. 621] use of the present participle of πιστεύω, especially in soteriological contexts in the NT.22
22 The aspectual force of the present ὁ πιστεύων seems to be in contrast with ὁ πιστεύσας. The aorist is used only eight times (plus two in the longer ending of Mark). The aorist is sometimes used to describe believers as such and thus has a generic force (cf. for the clearest example the v.l. at Mark 16:16; cf. also 2 Thess 1:10; Heb 4:3; perhaps John 7:39; also, negatively, of those who did not [μή] believe: 2 Thess 2:12; Jude 5). The present occurs six times as often (43 times), most often in soteriological contexts (cf. John 1:12; 3:15, 16, 18; 3:36; 6:35, 47, 64; 7:38; 11:25; 12:46; Acts 2:44; 10:43; 13:39; Rom 1:16; 3:22; 4:11, 24; 9:33; 10:4, 11; 1 Cor 1:21; 14:22 [bis]; Gal 3:22; Eph 1:19; 1 Thess 1:7; 2:10, 13; 1 Pet 2:6, 7; 1 John 5:1, 5, 10, 13). Thus, it seems that since the aorist participle was a live option to describe a “believer,” it is unlikely that when the present was used, it was aspectually flat. The present was the tense of choice most likely because the NT writers by and large saw continual belief as a necessary condition of salvation. Along these lines, it seems significant that the promise of salvation is almost always given to ὁ πιστεύων (cf. several of the above-cited texts), almost never to ὁ πιστεύσας (apart from Mark 16:16, John 7:39 and Heb 4:3 come the closest [the present tense of πιστεύω never occurs in Hebrews]).
@@smartchristians I have 3 comments you responded to so I have more than 1 topic to cover. Is there any evidence that Peter has the gift of interpretation besides your wanting it to be there?
@@Jesus_is_God77is there any evidence that ANYONE in the Bible had that gift. Other than this example we don’t have one. You are trying to prove that isn’t what interpretation looks like but you don’t have an example of what else it may look like.