I just love the way you're presenting here in this particular video (and the first part). If I may say so, your voice here is very calming and nice to listen to. The recommendations are outstanding, I didn't really connect to Armageddon when I first watched it a few years ago, but La Jetée was mindblowing and such a great recommendation.
Hello and wow you are very kind!! I am not at all to the level of a gentleman though I strive to be. My failings outweigh my successes though I try to better myself. Still, I am very honored by your kind compliment! I also saw your previous comment about the film KWAIDAN. Thank you so much for your time to visit my channel!!
I think Onibaba should have got a mention in your horror suggestions, but otherwise I love all of your recommendations! I'm a big sci-fi/horror/fantasy fan, so I enjoyed these videos even more than your usual ones :)
Surprisingly I don’t own any science fiction films from Criterion, so this video is very helpful to me. I think I’ll look into gettingThe Man Who Fell to Earth and The Blob for my first sci-fi Criterion films, just to sort of get a little taste of what they have to offer with sci-fi. So thank you again Daisuke for another great video. Also, if you haven’t seen Interstellar from Christopher Nolan, I think you may enjoy it. It’s very interesting and quite a spectacle to watch, like all of Nolan’s films. It’s just a very fascinating film to experience in my opinion.
Good luck getting TMWFTE it's OOP and going for north of $150 right now. Studio Canal released a good blu ray last year, but I hope Criterion reissues it at some point.
Yes, The Man Who Fell To Earth on Criterion is a bit hard to get without paying a bit of money for it. But there are other non-criterion releases that I think could be good. In any case, it is worth trying to hunt down because it is an unexpected film with so many surprises and David Bowie!
Daisuke Beppu I’ll look into getting The Man Who Fell to Earth however I can. I remember seeing it once before and recall enjoying it. I just never owned it and I hope get it so I can enjoy it again as well. Again, thank you for the great selections Daisuke.
Hi Daisuke, hope your day is going well. Thank you so much for your incredible and extensive recommendations! Your choices have given me a lot to go on for my next purchases. Thank you once again, it really is an honour to hear your detailed thoughts.
Christopher, I must apologize to you here as well for being late with my reply. I hope you can forgive me. And it is my pleasure to have been able to meet you my friend. I hope you are well.
You spoke eloquently and beautifully about Solaris. A film I have fallen asleep to- and also been extremely moved by. It contains one of my favourite film sequences- the long car drive through Tokyo. Thank you for mentioning World on a Wire and Robocop.
Hello Gareth, and please accept my apologies for the lateness of my reply. You are very kind with your comment. I hope this message reaches you and that you are well. Cheers my friend.
Hi Daisuke - Stellar suggestions as usual. I would only add GODZILLA and REPO MAN to your list. I don't understand all the hate for ARMAGEDDON from Criterion enthusiasts (as well as for other unpopular CC titles). To me, it's like arguing colors or composers. ARMAGEDDON is a fine film for what it is. SOLARIS it is not but It doesn't try to be.
The same thing happened to me on my first viewing of Solaris. I understand stood it a lot more on my second viewing and I think I’ll understand it more with age and more viewing. And I agree with everything you said about it. Also I’m surprised Stalker didn’t make the list for science fiction.
ARMAGEDDON is my greatest guilty pleasure - my most loved “bad movie” and I am dying to see it get a blu ray version on Criterion! Believe it or not this movie makes me cry every time? You probably know which emotional scene I’m referring to.
do you like Kubrick's 2001: A Space Odyssey ? Godard's Alphaville was a bit complex...i think Tarkovsky achieved the ideal line of making a sci-fi film.
Hello and yes, I do. I have not spoken at all about Kubrick on this channel, which I really need to fix. But, to answer your question, yes I do. Very much.
Love these videos my friend! Sold my soul at the criterion crossroads to get a copy of the face of another and the 3 films by hiroshi teshigahara! Can’t wait to watch it. Stay well good sir!
Horrorable Show, my dear friend, thank you so much!!!! Likewise, be well and talk to you again very soon. By the way, I subscribed to your YT channel, so if and when you have a new video, let me know. I look forward to anything you have to say about the horror genre my dear friend. Cheers and be well.
@@DaisukeBeppu that’s so kind man thank you! As always I don’t want anyone to feel obligated to watch my content if I support theirs! Our lives are very busy and I know we could watch everyone if we could! Thank you so much! Cheers!
I also felt the same way about Solaris when I first saw it. It was a little intricate at times and difficult to understand, but I mostly understood the main themes of the film. I agree with you on the themes of Solaris; it does have some very deep themes to it (I found it to be about the importance of human relationships, and our ability to succumb to our past memories). Overall, it's definitely a good movie for me to put in my collection.
Really surprised you didn't mention Brazil. Which I'm sure many would classify as Fantasy Noir. But with all the gadgets and gizmos, guts behind the walls, and ducts feeding everything, I'd say that's sci fi right there. Solaris I admit I watched a bit of once and couldn't get into it. I was surprised to see the remake with George Clooney come out. And was thinking that might be easier watch, and may make me more appreciative of the Russian version. Have you seen the more recent? Is it faithful to the original? Easier or harder to take? And lastly, your Man Who Fell To Earth, that's the version without the book? I was so excited when Criterion issued that one, I think I was third in line when it came off the press. So surprised it went OOP so fast as well.
Good point about Brazil, though I think I don't immediately classify it as "science fiction" but I think I should. And regarding Solaris, when you say "faithful to the original" are you referring to the novel? While I have read the novel only once, I think that the newer version has elements that are closer to the novel than Tarkovsky's work. While I really love the new version, I think for me in the end the Tarkovsky film cannot be beat. As for The Man Who Fell To Earth, I only showed the digipack blu ray, but I do have other versions of it (the plastic case blu ray, the DVD with the book, and the laserdisc). Yes, it is a shame that it fell OOP.
I was referring more to the original film, though the book sounds interesting as well. So would you recommend the Clooney version to watch first, then get into the earlier goods? Reminds me of the movie Sorcerer. It was okay, with a cool soundtrack. But when I got Criterions Wages Of Fear, that just blew my mind as you would say. So maybe same thing might happen with Solaris I wonder?
@@DungeonStudio, oh I see. Your story about Sorcerer/ Wages of Fear is a good comparison to make. Yes, if that is the kind of approach you are looking for, then, yes, perhaps it would be a good approach to watch the Soderbergh version first (which is really good I think) and then watch the Tarkovsky film.
Wow, didn't even know Soderbergh did the remake. Definitely like his catalog! Was really amazed how Friedkin tried to retool Wages Of Fear to be modern day, with back stories, and gruelling stunts. Yet it doesn't seem to go anywhere? With Clouzots version, it's much slower and more methodical, and how that tension builds! So I'll definitely give Solaris a go that way, and get back to you with my thoughts on both. Due to finances currently, it might not be for a while though. ;-)
@@DaisukeBeppu Hello Daisuke! I hope all is well with you (and your family) We have the Barnes & Noble sales going on right now here and I watched Parts 1 & 2 of your horror /sci-fi on Critrerion maybe to get some ideas...I am responding to this comment re your many versions of The Man Who Fell to Earth. Do any of these versions contain the theatrical version? I really like them both.... Your passion for Solaris is making me consider it as a purchase.
What you did with Solaris i kinda did with The Virgin Spring, didn't fall asleep just shut it off after about 20 min. For some reason though, having done so nagged me for years. Now its one if my 10 for sure, maybe 5, fav films of all.
So glad you ended with Solaris. I too fell asleep upon first viewing. Today, I cannot get enough of this film. Something about those reeds floating in that deep pool of water. I can never grasp why that scene gives me the chills. When the main character is seen staring at this pool of flowing reeds, I always get the feeling he see's himself as being like those reeds. Forever moving with that flow of life, unable to break free from the constant tide of human existence. When he arrives on Solaris and looks upon that never ending ocean planet surface, he will become like those reeds back on Earth. Forever trapped in Solaris never ending ocean of despair. So much has been written about this film. My take may seem trite, but that is one aspect always brings me back. Why does the main character look so deeply into that pool of reeds? I love this film.
Hi Daisuke, great video :) I need to check out the first Blob movie, I've only seen the 80s remake (which was good fun). I do own Solaris but haven't gotten around to watching it yet, I'm looking forward to it though. Was wondering if you had any plans to do a collection video on the 88 Films Asia Collection like you did for the Slasher Classics and Italian Collection?
Hello! Yes, the 80s version of the Blob is so scary and fun. I remember seeing it as a kid and it freaked me out! As for the Asia Collection, yes I want to do a video on my collection, but at the moment I am having some issues receiving the latest releases. Once I have received them, I will try to do a collection video (as well as, hopefully, an update video regarding additional acquisitions I made on the other 88 Films collections). I apologize for working so slowly with my videos, but I haven't forgotten the Asia Collection! Thank you for the kind reminder though. I appreciate it.
@@DaisukeBeppu I totally understand and no need to apologize! Your video output is great, keep it up. I'm really looking forward to hearing your thoughts/comments on the films. I actually haven't seen any in the Asia Collection myself but am about to delve into it with The Oily Maniac and Seeding of a Ghost :) Looking forward to seeing what you upload next :)
@@matthewregan4136, Oh, those films are zany and wild. The Oily Maniac... wow... talk about a film that is so UN-politically correct! If one can go along for what the film is, then I think it can be such a campy funny film watch. A very unforgettable experience!
Hello Eric, and thank you. I hope you enjoy it and please let me know what you think after you have seen it. I would love to hear your thoughts on it anytime.
Hi Daisuke, I love your video as always it’s always a highlight of my day whenever you upload. If you are so kind could you please recommend any Indian cinema directors other than Satyajit Ray as this is a severe gap in my knowledge. Thank you so much again. :)
@@DaisukeBeppu No problem at all my friend, you did answer this on another comment section video back when this video was uploaded so it's all fine. You recommended Ritwil Ghatak I believe. Thanks again. :)
I bought the new 4k restoration of Alphaville from Kino Lorber, and what a great movie it is!! Things To Come and World On a Wire are RIGHT up my/that alley; will have to check them out! Finally I'd like to give my 2 cents worth about the idea of films being or not being "Criterion Collection worthy": What utter nonsense! We can (and do..) all have ideas about what is and what isn't "worthy" of being in the collection, but it's all film, and all thought-provoking. I would personally never buy Armageddon, but would be happy to see/own Jellyfish Eyes. Someone else would see that differently. Oh, and I own Solaris; a masterpiece, if a hard-to watch, digest and consider, one.
I was very interested in your comments on Solaris and how you found it difficult to get into the first time you watched it. I had the same experience. Are there other films you didn't get into, disliked or even abandoned during the first viewing that you later fell in love with? I think that could be an interesting topic if you haven't dealt with that already.
Hi dear Daisuke, I hope you're doing well I'm sorry, it may sound defective to say this here, I was wondering what your thoughts are on Alejandro Jodorowsky, Andrey Zvyagintsev and Ken Russel filmographies...do you think they're being snubbed by criterion or not? If you're a fan, then what are your favorites among them?
Oh, gosh, what a great question. First of all, while I don't necessarily see it as being "snubbed", I still think that it is undeniable that these directors have made films that are "Criterion worthy" (whatever that phrase means). I have seen Leviathan and it was very powerful and memorable. I should watch it again. As for Jodorowsky, I remember when I was living in New York, I went to the theater to see El Topo and The Holy Mountain. And in fact Mr. Jodorowsky was there to take questions, and it was amazing. He was so full of life and energy and you could tell he was so happy to see these films being released again after so many years. As for Ken Russell, I love his films so much. I know Women in Love is now in the Criterion Collection. But of course there is always room for more Russell in the collection. I think the one that has always been rumored (but I do not know how realistic this is) is THE DEVILS. If this can get a proper release by Criterion, I think I would be so happy.
@@DaisukeBeppu Thanks for response, I'm such a fan of The Holy Mountain and El Topo, and of course later jodorowsky's... and it's would be wonderful if we get The Devils in Criterion Collection. Btw check The Return, The Banishment if you haven't yet. They're just marvelous! particularly The Return!! I'm looking forward to share more thoughts on films & cinema in general with you and discover more about its power and facets. Keep up the good work sir and "Don't drink all the coke".
Oh yes. Armageddon. I like this one a lot too, and I hope it gets an upgrade. This was also a CC laserdisc and so it does have a strong connection with the CC.
For All Mankind makes me want to go somewhat off topic and give a shout out to First Man. Love it so much, did not deserve the false bs it got from the media (shocking, i know) pre release. Makes a great double feature with For All Mankind. The moon landing sequence in First Man is an all time great.
As fun as Armageddon is to watch, it has no right to be even considered as an addition to the Criterion collection. I can only guess it's inclusion was experimental at the time.
+S Mido, thank you! Yes, this is a controversial entry, and I hope to talk about it soon. Incidentally this was also released as a CC laserdisc (it happens to have been the last CC spine numbered laserdisc that was released).
I think it's not the standard Criterion uses. Well I understand why the majority of people (including myself) will only 'mark' a film as a masterpiece if it's artistic, deep, meaningful, technically impressive, and influencing. Those are the films that will have above 90% in RT and the films that will get tons of analysis. But the thing is, to be criterion worthy, a film just needs to be exactly what the director wanted to be in the first place. And that's what Bay wanted in this movie. This movie doesn't pretend to be a deep or moving or emotional action movie, it is literally the epitome of classic over-the-top action that is just what bay intended to be. It isn't 'fake'. Another example is starship troopers but the acting in it is very ...... Wooden-like which really no directors will ever want the actors to do a bad job. Jellyfish eyes I guess is also a fun, kid sci-fi movie that's intended to be a fun, kid sci fi movie. I haven't seen it but I heard a lot of people saying that the acting is good and that it's enjoyable. So yea, criterion is putting up all the movies that define what cinema is. It is more about the director than about a viewer's standard of films
I just love the way you're presenting here in this particular video (and the first part). If I may say so, your voice here is very calming and nice to listen to. The recommendations are outstanding, I didn't really connect to Armageddon when I first watched it a few years ago, but La Jetée was mindblowing and such a great recommendation.
Thank you so much. That is very very kind of you to say! Cheers and warmest regards.
Your collection is marvellous! It’s like a movie library very impressive
You are very kind. Thank you very much!
Love the intro of Satie. You seem like a true gentleman and there are so few of them around these days.
Hello and wow you are very kind!! I am not at all to the level of a gentleman though I strive to be. My failings outweigh my successes though I try to better myself. Still, I am very honored by your kind compliment! I also saw your previous comment about the film KWAIDAN. Thank you so much for your time to visit my channel!!
I think Seconds (1966) deserves a mention as it is both part horror and part sci-fi
What a great suggestion!! Yes, I agree 100%!!
I think Onibaba should have got a mention in your horror suggestions, but otherwise I love all of your recommendations! I'm a big sci-fi/horror/fantasy fan, so I enjoyed these videos even more than your usual ones :)
Awesome addition regarding Onibaba. I agree completely. Thank you!
Surprisingly I don’t own any science fiction films from Criterion, so this video is very helpful to me. I think I’ll look into gettingThe Man Who Fell to Earth and The Blob for my first sci-fi Criterion films, just to sort of get a little taste of what they have to offer with sci-fi. So thank you again Daisuke for another great video. Also, if you haven’t seen Interstellar from Christopher Nolan, I think you may enjoy it. It’s very interesting and quite a spectacle to watch, like all of Nolan’s films. It’s just a very fascinating film to experience in my opinion.
Good luck getting TMWFTE it's OOP and going for north of $150 right now. Studio Canal released a good blu ray last year, but I hope Criterion reissues it at some point.
Yes, The Man Who Fell To Earth on Criterion is a bit hard to get without paying a bit of money for it. But there are other non-criterion releases that I think could be good. In any case, it is worth trying to hunt down because it is an unexpected film with so many surprises and David Bowie!
Infametheus thanks for the heads up.
Daisuke Beppu I’ll look into getting The Man Who Fell to Earth however I can. I remember seeing it once before and recall enjoying it. I just never owned it and I hope get it so I can enjoy it again as well. Again, thank you for the great selections Daisuke.
Hi Daisuke, hope your day is going well.
Thank you so much for your incredible and extensive recommendations! Your choices have given me a lot to go on for my next purchases. Thank you once again, it really is an honour to hear your detailed thoughts.
Christopher, I must apologize to you here as well for being late with my reply. I hope you can forgive me. And it is my pleasure to have been able to meet you my friend. I hope you are well.
@@DaisukeBeppu No problem at all, we all have a life! I too hope that you are well. Looking forward to your future videos!
You spoke eloquently and beautifully about Solaris. A film I have fallen asleep to- and also been extremely moved by. It contains one of my favourite film sequences- the long car drive through Tokyo. Thank you for mentioning World on a Wire and Robocop.
Hello Gareth, and please accept my apologies for the lateness of my reply. You are very kind with your comment. I hope this message reaches you and that you are well. Cheers my friend.
Hi Daisuke - Stellar suggestions as usual. I would only add GODZILLA and REPO MAN to your list. I don't understand all the hate for ARMAGEDDON from Criterion enthusiasts (as well as for other unpopular CC titles). To me, it's like arguing colors or composers. ARMAGEDDON is a fine film for what it is. SOLARIS it is not but It doesn't try to be.
Great suggestions regarding Godzilla and Repo Man!
And thank you for the comment about Armageddon. Great comment.
I wish they could put together a classic 50's sci fi collection.
That would be awesome! A great idea!!
The same thing happened to me on my first viewing of Solaris. I understand stood it a lot more on my second viewing and I think I’ll understand it more with age and more viewing. And I agree with everything you said about it. Also I’m surprised Stalker didn’t make the list for science fiction.
Thank you so much for this great comment my friend.
Thank you for these recommendations my friend!
There are some that I'm not familiar with so I will have to check them out.
Thank you very much, and I apologize for the lateness of my reply. I hope you are well.
ARMAGEDDON is my greatest guilty pleasure - my most loved “bad movie” and I am dying to see it get a blu ray version on Criterion! Believe it or not this movie makes me cry every time? You probably know which emotional scene I’m referring to.
Haha!!! Yes, Victor!!!! I know I know, and I feel the same way.
I cried too.
@@machiwoomiapoo thank you for the comment, my friend!
do you like Kubrick's 2001: A Space Odyssey ?
Godard's Alphaville was a bit complex...i think Tarkovsky achieved the ideal line of making a sci-fi film.
Hello and yes, I do. I have not spoken at all about Kubrick on this channel, which I really need to fix. But, to answer your question, yes I do. Very much.
Love these videos my friend! Sold my soul at the criterion crossroads to get a copy of the face of another and the 3 films by hiroshi teshigahara! Can’t wait to watch it. Stay well good sir!
Horrorable Show, my dear friend, thank you so much!!!! Likewise, be well and talk to you again very soon. By the way, I subscribed to your YT channel, so if and when you have a new video, let me know. I look forward to anything you have to say about the horror genre my dear friend. Cheers and be well.
@@DaisukeBeppu that’s so kind man thank you! As always I don’t want anyone to feel obligated to watch my content if I support theirs! Our lives are very busy and I know we could watch everyone if we could! Thank you so much! Cheers!
I also felt the same way about Solaris when I first saw it. It was a little intricate at times and difficult to understand, but I mostly understood the main themes of the film. I agree with you on the themes of Solaris; it does have some very deep themes to it (I found it to be about the importance of human relationships, and our ability to succumb to our past memories). Overall, it's definitely a good movie for me to put in my collection.
Thank you so much for the comment!!
Really surprised you didn't mention Brazil. Which I'm sure many would classify as Fantasy Noir. But with all the gadgets and gizmos, guts behind the walls, and ducts feeding everything, I'd say that's sci fi right there. Solaris I admit I watched a bit of once and couldn't get into it. I was surprised to see the remake with George Clooney come out. And was thinking that might be easier watch, and may make me more appreciative of the Russian version. Have you seen the more recent? Is it faithful to the original? Easier or harder to take? And lastly, your Man Who Fell To Earth, that's the version without the book? I was so excited when Criterion issued that one, I think I was third in line when it came off the press. So surprised it went OOP so fast as well.
Good point about Brazil, though I think I don't immediately classify it as "science fiction" but I think I should.
And regarding Solaris, when you say "faithful to the original" are you referring to the novel? While I have read the novel only once, I think that the newer version has elements that are closer to the novel than Tarkovsky's work. While I really love the new version, I think for me in the end the Tarkovsky film cannot be beat.
As for The Man Who Fell To Earth, I only showed the digipack blu ray, but I do have other versions of it (the plastic case blu ray, the DVD with the book, and the laserdisc). Yes, it is a shame that it fell OOP.
I was referring more to the original film, though the book sounds interesting as well. So would you recommend the Clooney version to watch first, then get into the earlier goods? Reminds me of the movie Sorcerer. It was okay, with a cool soundtrack. But when I got Criterions Wages Of Fear, that just blew my mind as you would say. So maybe same thing might happen with Solaris I wonder?
@@DungeonStudio, oh I see. Your story about Sorcerer/ Wages of Fear is a good comparison to make. Yes, if that is the kind of approach you are looking for, then, yes, perhaps it would be a good approach to watch the Soderbergh version first (which is really good I think) and then watch the Tarkovsky film.
Wow, didn't even know Soderbergh did the remake. Definitely like his catalog! Was really amazed how Friedkin tried to retool Wages Of Fear to be modern day, with back stories, and gruelling stunts. Yet it doesn't seem to go anywhere? With Clouzots version, it's much slower and more methodical, and how that tension builds! So I'll definitely give Solaris a go that way, and get back to you with my thoughts on both. Due to finances currently, it might not be for a while though. ;-)
@@DaisukeBeppu Hello Daisuke! I hope all is well with you (and your family) We have the Barnes & Noble sales going on right now here and I watched Parts 1 & 2 of your horror /sci-fi on Critrerion maybe to get some ideas...I am responding to this comment re your many versions of The Man Who Fell to Earth. Do any of these versions contain the theatrical version? I really like them both.... Your passion for Solaris is making me consider it as a purchase.
What you did with Solaris i kinda did with The Virgin Spring, didn't fall asleep just shut it off after about 20 min. For some reason though, having done so nagged me for years. Now its one if my 10 for sure, maybe 5, fav films of all.
Thank you so much again, Mark. Very interesting about your approach to the Virgin Spring. Cheers and I hope you are well.
So glad you ended with Solaris. I too fell asleep upon first viewing. Today, I cannot get enough of this film. Something about those reeds floating in that deep pool of water. I can never grasp why that scene gives me the chills. When the main character is seen staring at this pool of flowing reeds, I always get the feeling he see's himself as being like those reeds. Forever moving with that flow of life, unable to break free from the constant tide of human existence. When he arrives on Solaris and looks upon that never ending ocean planet surface, he will become like those reeds back on Earth. Forever trapped in Solaris never ending ocean of despair. So much has been written about this film. My take may seem trite, but that is one aspect always brings me back. Why does the main character look so deeply into that pool of reeds? I love this film.
thank you so much for your kind words and great comment my friend. Cheers, Edward, and I hope you are well. Warmest regards.
Hi Daisuke, great video :) I need to check out the first Blob movie, I've only seen the 80s remake (which was good fun). I do own Solaris but haven't gotten around to watching it yet, I'm looking forward to it though. Was wondering if you had any plans to do a collection video on the 88 Films Asia Collection like you did for the Slasher Classics and Italian Collection?
Hello! Yes, the 80s version of the Blob is so scary and fun. I remember seeing it as a kid and it freaked me out!
As for the Asia Collection, yes I want to do a video on my collection, but at the moment I am having some issues receiving the latest releases. Once I have received them, I will try to do a collection video (as well as, hopefully, an update video regarding additional acquisitions I made on the other 88 Films collections). I apologize for working so slowly with my videos, but I haven't forgotten the Asia Collection! Thank you for the kind reminder though. I appreciate it.
@@DaisukeBeppu I totally understand and no need to apologize! Your video output is great, keep it up. I'm really looking forward to hearing your thoughts/comments on the films. I actually haven't seen any in the Asia Collection myself but am about to delve into it with The Oily Maniac and Seeding of a Ghost :) Looking forward to seeing what you upload next :)
@@matthewregan4136, Oh, those films are zany and wild. The Oily Maniac... wow... talk about a film that is so UN-politically correct! If one can go along for what the film is, then I think it can be such a campy funny film watch. A very unforgettable experience!
I just blind bought Things to Come, can’t wait to watch it!
Hello Eric, and thank you. I hope you enjoy it and please let me know what you think after you have seen it. I would love to hear your thoughts on it anytime.
Armageddon is a masterpiece, I don't care what anyone says. Cool to see it featured on your channel!
Hello again my friend and thank you so much as always!
Hi Daisuke, I love your video as always it’s always a highlight of my day whenever you upload. If you are so kind could you please recommend any Indian cinema directors other than Satyajit Ray as this is a severe gap in my knowledge. Thank you so much again. :)
Oh gosh, I am sorry for replying to this comment of your so late!!! I hope you can forgive me! Cheers my friend.
@@DaisukeBeppu No problem at all my friend, you did answer this on another comment section video back when this video was uploaded so it's all fine. You recommended Ritwil Ghatak I believe. Thanks again. :)
I bought the new 4k restoration of Alphaville from Kino Lorber, and what a great movie it is!! Things To Come and World On a Wire are RIGHT up my/that alley; will have to check them out! Finally I'd like to give my 2 cents worth about the idea of films being or not being "Criterion Collection worthy": What utter nonsense! We can (and do..) all have ideas about what is and what isn't "worthy" of being in the collection, but it's all film, and all thought-provoking. I would personally never buy Armageddon, but would be happy to see/own Jellyfish Eyes. Someone else would see that differently. Oh, and I own Solaris; a masterpiece, if a hard-to watch, digest and consider, one.
Thank you so much for commenting on this older video! Wow... I am so appreciative of it my friend. Cheers and have a great day.
I was very interested in your comments on Solaris and how you found it difficult to get into the first time you watched it. I had the same experience. Are there other films you didn't get into, disliked or even abandoned during the first viewing that you later fell in love with? I think that could be an interesting topic if you haven't dealt with that already.
Patrick Doherty thank you again!! May I address this comment in a future video?
@@DaisukeBeppu absolutely. I'd be delighted. I look forward to hearing your thoughts on the topic.
Hi dear Daisuke, I hope you're doing well
I'm sorry, it may sound defective to say this here, I was wondering what your thoughts are on Alejandro Jodorowsky, Andrey Zvyagintsev and Ken Russel filmographies...do you think they're being snubbed by criterion or not? If you're a fan, then what are your favorites among them?
Oh, gosh, what a great question. First of all, while I don't necessarily see it as being "snubbed", I still think that it is undeniable that these directors have made films that are "Criterion worthy" (whatever that phrase means). I have seen Leviathan and it was very powerful and memorable. I should watch it again.
As for Jodorowsky, I remember when I was living in New York, I went to the theater to see El Topo and The Holy Mountain. And in fact Mr. Jodorowsky was there to take questions, and it was amazing. He was so full of life and energy and you could tell he was so happy to see these films being released again after so many years.
As for Ken Russell, I love his films so much. I know Women in Love is now in the Criterion Collection. But of course there is always room for more Russell in the collection. I think the one that has always been rumored (but I do not know how realistic this is) is THE DEVILS. If this can get a proper release by Criterion, I think I would be so happy.
@@DaisukeBeppu Thanks for response, I'm such a fan of The Holy Mountain and El Topo, and of course later jodorowsky's... and it's would be wonderful if we get The Devils in Criterion Collection. Btw check The Return, The Banishment if you haven't yet. They're just marvelous! particularly The Return!!
I'm looking forward to share more thoughts on films & cinema in general with you and discover more about its power and facets.
Keep up the good work sir and "Don't drink all the coke".
You mention some I need to check out like Solaris. Keep hoping Armageddon will get a blu upgrade from Criterion one day.
Oh yes. Armageddon. I like this one a lot too, and I hope it gets an upgrade. This was also a CC laserdisc and so it does have a strong connection with the CC.
I just got/watched Twilight Times 80's version of the Blob and it's great. Need to get Criterion original version.
I remember that version! I saw it as a kid and it scared me so much! (The scene with the sink drain, and the scene with the telephone booth!)
For All Mankind makes me want to go somewhat off topic and give a shout out to First Man. Love it so much, did not deserve the false bs it got from the media (shocking, i know) pre release.
Makes a great double feature with For All Mankind.
The moon landing sequence in First Man is an all time great.
Thank you so much and yes, FOR ALL MANKIND!! And thank you so much for the suggestion of that double feature.
hi
Hello!
What about stalker?
Oh yes! A great one. If I am able to update this video I’d definitely include it.
As fun as Armageddon is to watch, it has no right to be even considered as an addition to the Criterion collection. I can only guess it's inclusion was experimental at the time.
+S Mido, thank you! Yes, this is a controversial entry, and I hope to talk about it soon. Incidentally this was also released as a CC laserdisc (it happens to have been the last CC spine numbered laserdisc that was released).
I think it's not the standard Criterion uses. Well I understand why the majority of people (including myself) will only 'mark' a film as a masterpiece if it's artistic, deep, meaningful, technically impressive, and influencing. Those are the films that will have above 90% in RT and the films that will get tons of analysis. But the thing is, to be criterion worthy, a film just needs to be exactly what the director wanted to be in the first place. And that's what Bay wanted in this movie. This movie doesn't pretend to be a deep or moving or emotional action movie, it is literally the epitome of classic over-the-top action that is just what bay intended to be. It isn't 'fake'. Another example is starship troopers but the acting in it is very ...... Wooden-like which really no directors will ever want the actors to do a bad job. Jellyfish eyes I guess is also a fun, kid sci-fi movie that's intended to be a fun, kid sci fi movie. I haven't seen it but I heard a lot of people saying that the acting is good and that it's enjoyable. So yea, criterion is putting up all the movies that define what cinema is. It is more about the director than about a viewer's standard of films
Sir, I feel like I want to learn rudimentary Japanese just so I could have a conversation with you in what I assume is your native tongue.
Thank you my friend!