Prosecution gives closing arguments in the Samantha Woll murder trial
Vložit
- čas přidán 8. 07. 2024
- After nearly four weeks, the prosecution gave its closing arguments in the Samantha Woll murder trial on Tuesday. The prosecutor spoke for nearly two hours in a final plea for the jury to convict Michael Jackson-Bolanos.
If he innocent he sure screwed him self in that interrogation, that interrogation made me doubt his innocence
I mean that and the fact that he’s consistently lied from the start… he just happened to find a dead woman while committing crime in the night… hmm 🤔
That's what I don't understand she came home from a wedding why was she in a hoodie and jogging pants. Who was with her? Attorney Brown grazed over that. She was not alone. OR She was expecting someone to come over she was not going to bed in jogging pants and a hoodie. That's the biggest thing right there and I think that there has to be evidence that they didn't put in to court from her phone it has to be more evidence either she was with somebody at her house or she was waiting on somebody to come over. that man is innocent find a real guy because she had company. The prosecutor talking about common sense which he clearly does not have and his rebuttal at the end was terrible. Sheesh....
The only incident that I can't overcome is the fact that you let the real killer get away. The prosecutor say this is a common sense case but the prosecution didn't use common sense lol at all. Even some of the witnesses didn't have common sense attorney Brown was literally getting frustrated because he's saying the things clear as day and they wanted to put the dumb roll on make this make sense😂😂😂😂 the evidence is not powerful its very weak and uninvestigated. the real killer came forward and y'all let him go let's just call it what it is
End of Oct in Detroit after midnight, I would put sweats on too if going to living room to watch a movie. Pull them off later before getting into bed sometime in the middle of the night. Poor girl.
Agree 💯
This is not an intelligent take. She probably wanted to get comfortable on a cold night and then fell asleep. You did not make a good point here.
@@michelero4297 it's not that cold In Detroit in October, and she was in sweats AND A HOODIE, who sleeps like that?? And if she was cold why would she leave her door open?? EXACTLY, now go back and try again
This prosecutor's actions are deeply troubling. The suspect, Herbstman, effectively admitted to the crime when he stated, "I don't remember; I don't remember anything." Despite this, the prosecutor appears to be unfairly targeting a Black man, suggesting a bias that undermines justice.
Who's lying, the defendant, or the prosecutor?
The defendant.
Prosecutor has very weak case and gave boyfriend immunity even though he confessed
The defendant
That’s all thieves do is Lie and Connive who ever they can! Then come back for your eye sockets!
@@Ruby-60 let's keep politics out of this, not speaking of 45!
The prosecutor's argument that if the defendant had blood on his hand it couldn't have transferred to his jacket or backpack is pretty weak. You could easily brush your jacket sleeve with your hand or touch your backpack as you're adjusting it or taking it off and transfer blood onto it. Not a great argument.
@@murderwiththecourt7834 l did EMS for years. I’ve checked pulses of many actively bleeding patients and have treated several different types of wounds including knife wounds. Never had to wash my jacket from having so much blood on me. Like the defendant i was always wearing disposable gloves too. You wouldn’t get blood all over you from checking a quick pulse. Also let’s not forget that the guy who actually called 911 touched her and didn’t have blood all over his clothes either. AND he washed the jacket. And on top of that i find it highly unlikely that it just so happens on the night of her murder he wasn’t carrying a knife even though he’s been shown to carry knives on his person regularly. You’re telling me he was out breaking into cars, in Detroit, at night, and didn’t have any means of protecting himself? Yea i call bs. Not only that but they raid his home and find a knife very consistent with the knife used to kill the victim and slash the tires of a car he was proven to be standing next to. Too many coincidences.
Seat belt cutter,what a total load of BS
But why would a car thief stab side walls? It can’t be patched and can’t be driven . Usually thugs stab sidewalls cuz they angry at owner and wanna hurt them with financial stress of having to buy tires.
Maybe he was testing the knife? Maybe he wanted the car stranded for some reason? 🤷🏾♂️
@@lennysmith8851 Or maybe he just did it cause it was there and he was hiding behind it. Its not like this guy was out walking his dog during the night time. He was out committing crimes and openly said so.
Oh boy was out there moving like a crackhead 😳
Brilliant argument
Did they check the bonfire. 🤔
Nope. They never checked to see what was in there
Now I think he did it..but why
Door was open and he walked in, thinking no one was home. They startled each other and he went crazy, to keep from being found out and arrested.
Listen to defense closing
@@joanbaczek2575 i listened to both and a few other hours long testimonies including Jeff Herbstman’s. The defense attorney is very good at his job and certainly created enough doubt to cause at least 1 of 12 jurors to vote not guilty. But after hearing the prosecution out fully: MJ did that shit. He claims to never have gone inside the house but it just so happens the moment he’s within 150 of her residence (breaking into cars w/ a knife no less) the motion detector goes off. And now he’s got a significant amount of blood on him in places where u’d expect the killer to have it? The defense had me going for a sec but nah way too many coincidences.
Because the prosecution has a solid case based on evidence and common sense and the defendant has nothing but misdirection and “Trust me bro”
@@lennysmith8851he had two small specks of blood on his jacket. How would that be possible if there was blood splattered all over the house including the walls? Of course after hearing the prosecutor you would have doubts because that’s what he’s supposed to do. Too much of this does not add up to MJB doing this. I personally think the drops of blood was planted on his jacket so they could close the case.
When is The Predator attorney making his closing
He did it,hes a liar, a thief who goes out to break into cars with just a flash light just checking doir handles ? BS,he has a long record of this and he only gets into cars just by checking door handles is total crap,he went out that night with more than a flash light,he went out with protection too just incase and he just happened to see a woman on the floor so he thought oh ill check her neck oh there's bloid on my hand now,Bs,thats the hand that stabbed her thats why there is blood on your hand.liar,as if he checked her neck bs
DNA don't lie, defendants do.
He was out at night looking for an opportunity to steal and stumbked across a door that was open and went in to steal and she saw him and he killed her because she saw his face and he's trying to make us believe he saw a woman on the floor and touched her neck and oh ive got blood on my hand BS,its the hand you had the knife.
OMG why didn’t you testify to what you saw that night ? You were there right ?
@kimboyd5985 he's a liar,lies after lies,if you have been watching you would see it for yourself, from interrogation to court he has changed what he has said and also he's the only one with blood on him and his clothes,you really believe he saw a body and checked for a pulse ? Lol,that is his excuse for having blood on him which is total bs,the only way his lawyers can try and paint another picture is putting the murder on one of her exes and portray them as doing it where there is no proof but there is proof on MJ as he was there,had a knife,blood on him.If he's lucky he will get a hung jury.
@kimboyd5985 was you there ? The jury there?,his lawyers there ? No, but they are saying he didn't do it, so your comment is naive and childish.lusten at interrogation what he says and what he says in court, lied and changed many many times.he definitely did it but that leading police woman's attitude in court is terrible, and that ex boyfriend is very sketchy,if I was one if the jurors I'd say he did going by evidence but I'd want a retrial so the cop and ex boyfriends can be looked into where they were in that night.
@@mikeymike1854 if you were one of jurors you would vote to put a man in jail who (MAY) be Innocent ? With that sketchy investigation and a crazy drug abusing , obsessed, depressed , scorn ex who Admitted he did it and ( MAY) be guilty? I’m not saying that the defendant is NOT a criminal, even if he was at the wrong place at the wrong time he was still doing a crime , I might even feel childish enough to ( that’s what he gets for breaking into peoples cars) I’d say it should be a hung jury’ and I hope Ms. Woll gets justice, but not by sending a innocent man to jail , and MIKEYmike I am in No way naive , I know reasonable doubt when I smell it and it’s 💩 all over this trial …
@kimboyd5985 I told you what I'd do. You think he's innocent because he's black, and I bet you and the rest of the black community were wanting Oj Simpson to be acquitted, too, when he was obviously guilty.
Guilty!
Damn. He convinced me, give me my dollar back.
Hey! Leave the dollars there
❤️✊🏾
Wow even the jacket is telling a story the blood stain are consistent with what the defendant indicated when he said he checked her neck for pulse
Triumph of science and technology
Triumph of an investigation 😂
Dude stop!
It kind of is tho
So he didn't leave any evidence of himself? Who did all the shoe prints belong to? You mean to tell me that he was so smart that he did not leave any evidence of himself inside of the apartment but was so dumb that he couldn't get all of the blood off of his jacket? So you mean to tell me that even though clearly there was a blood spray he was able to absolutely and perfectly remove every last drop of blood that was on his jacket or in his hair or anything all the way off of him and his shoes and everything and he did it so good that only one drop was left on the sleeve? What kind of laundry is his girlfriend doing? Is she using disappearing dust? If his jacket is so water resistant or liquid resistant then how could there be any blood or any type of liquid or anything on the jacket? Where is everyone else's DNA and footprints? Since when is there no absolving or reasoning about any other suspect it seems like there are some points missing in the prosecutor like where did they get that picture of that guy leaving whether he was getting out of a car or not he was there at 1:20 why didn't they question every single last person or figure out what the guy was wearing the x? There are just too many too many questions and common Sense will appoint all of that out in the very least!
Have you watched the trial? The blood "spray" was only on a lower part of one wall. All the wounds except 2 were covered. I think he was stabbing her from behind as she was trying to flea. He had gloves on and covered head to tow like a hazmat worker in black.
@@michelero4297I still think Jeff was responsible for her murder. I think they snuggled on the couch and he stabbed her while laying on the couch behind her. The wounds correspond with that, and there’s a lack of evidence showing that Michael ever entered the house at all. So much unanswered here.
Shameful.
He says don't look the other way? while he turned his head away on the other suspects, he's case is so poor, yes he lied about the cars at first because he was scared about going to jail for 20 years, and the detectives who interviewed him had lied to him saying the interview was about stolen glasses, of course after knowing the real reason he was there he said the truth about why he was there and everything he said can be corroborated from the videos. He is innocent!
ALL THESE LIES AND THE MAN IS INNOCENT! MY GOD WHAT A INJUSTICE! YOU SHOULD BE ASHAMED OF YOURSELF CALL YOURSELF STATE LAWYER DISGRACE!
MJB blew it when he said he didn’t know if she was German or anything else? He also gave his own motive for murder, he couldn’t get caught because of the habitual offender act , he killed her because she would’ve called police.
You can’t tell nationality by looking at someone! I’m polish yet people think I’m Native American or Spanish because I have dark hair and dark skin 🤦🏾♀️
He couldn’t call 911 when he found her cuz then he’d be in trouble when they ask him what he doing at odd time of night. Car thief only steals cars that chop shop requests based on demand which changes often. He’s a habitual petty thief which is a big leap to murder
@@joanbaczek2575 play with fire enough, bound to get burnt.
The Wayne County Prosecutors Office has been CAUGHT lying for years and nobody at does anything about it.
Is today the first day that the prosecutor will be honest?!
Seem like that's all they do is lie the prosecutor witnesses but then when the defendant lie all hell break loose and they are liars
The prosecutor is Gaslighting
@@Nahtassja nah he’s following the evidence and forming a very reasonable common sense argument
Wow i was doing my best to believe him but hearing him talk and got me thinking bro…..
Maybe him & the ex boyfriend both was in on it 🤷🏾♂️
Dammn bro i was believing u but now u suspect
One thing this whole trial that was bothering me was the way Samantha Woll was stabbed screams personal. I mean 8 times? That’s gotta be rage. Sounds a lot like a jilted lover right? Then it hit me: MJ is an ex felon. Spent time in prison and carries knives. Not sure how many of you are familiar with prison/jail stabbings but that’s how they stab their victims. Repeatedly & quickly then they bounce. He’s lying about not entering the home and he’s lying about not having a knife. Michael-Jackson Bolanos is guilty!
Or someone knowing he will go to prison for 20+ for just creeping into her house and he's determined to NOT go back to jail. Leave no witnesses.
Le procureur est hautain et sarcastique !il est froid et on sent le racisme en lui!
Of course everything’s racism
@@jimmypruzzo7703trust me… a lot is
@@jimmypruzzo7703all I see is “pinned on the black man”. No it just so happens that the man lurking in the early hours, climbing over, trying car doors, blood on him is black. 🙄
Not guilty, clearly shown on video/his own words. Notice he doesn't state the amt of blood. Notice he's being vague on supposed evidence. Not guilty!
Yup the blood not even visible if he stabbed her he’d be cover and marked up she fought. That much blood stains it don’t wash out. He would have had to throw that jacket out. No blood on shoes or pants . This prosecutor must be special needs. People should never talk to cops always get lawyer first it don’t mean guilt it’s a right.
@@joanbaczek2575did you watch this entire video?
@@joanbaczek2575 Did you watch the trial? Don't go by opening/closing arguments from attorneys, you have to see the evidence presented and listen to the people to see if they are creditable .
A big part of the jury instructions is how to see if someone is creditable or not. What to do if they decide someone is not telling the truth or the whole truth and how to proceed. A large part of a jury findings is based on the jury instructions.
This is why they went over the lies, again and again, counting up to over 25.
Prosecution failed to prove anything other than the defendant is not guilty really. And this dork here knows it so he resorted to just writing the words liar in big red letters over pics of MJB and mudslinging stuff he did as a minor. So many liars in this trial but the one he labeled spoke truth. Many prayers for the jury that they can see past all the distraction the weasel tried to give. While they waste time pointing fingers at an innocent man there is someone out there who really did this and as things get worse he or she who ever it is will panick and probably do it again to get rid of witnesses. Watch. This is not over. But if any more blood does get spilt I blame Detroit's finest for their predjudice and failed police work and this group of lawyers who refuse to look at the one runnjng from the scene. Calling some one a liar when you have nothing else is just really like a child having a fit they can't tattle and lie. The only lies in this room came from prosecutions scared witnesses who all passed the buck claiming they don't have memories and it was not their job.
So how do you explain the motion detector INSIDE the home going off exactly as the defendant is tracked to be within 100 feet of her home? Why do you think he lied about seeing the body? He already admitted to scoping out cars to the police so why lie? How do you explain the blood all over his jacket to the point of needing to wash it? Do honestly believe that a car thief, at night in Detroit did not have a knife on him? It’s not like they just chose a random black person to prosecute. They are following evidence
@@lennysmith8851 i believe it happened the way defense said I believe she fell passed out regained consciousness and went outside.
@@Gwen19764 What about the motion detector tho? And the blood on the defendant?
@@lennysmith8851 did you watch the whole trial? It's been explained all of it has by the defense. He saw her and took her pulse. The blood on his arm was a splootch smaller the tip of an ink pen. In that blood they identified Sam's DNA but also unknown male DNA that DOES NOT match MJB. We believe someone met up with her and came home with her. The three minutes they give for MJB to have dint this 8 times and hit her and struggled room to room.... And made it to Greek Town Bridge with no blood anywhere but I. His sleeve! You buy that crap?
Also they never bothered to test the unknown DNA to Jeff .. sweet old jelouse Jeff. They have a man running away on camera from the scene. And MJB is across the street in the frame at the same time as the guy who is running away. You can see it's not him but they never bothered to look into that man who strangely looks similar to Jeff in that camera. and keep in mind they don't give innocent people immunity. MJB is a thief but he didn't hurt that girl or go into her house. And explained to me please how did his three inch pocket tool leave a 6 inch in depth hole in her neck? And not have any trace of blood on it after? They got so much pressure they rushed. And he makes a good suspect but they didn't finish. Now the one who really did it runs free while we waste time here. And he will panick and he will harm again. It's just a matter of when now. Think about it.
Whatever man he is still innocent. No evidence that proves he was in the apartment and furthermore he would’ve taken all or some of the valuables that were laid in plain view.
Not if he committed murder
After he had to ensure there were no witnesses the last thing he wanted was to be caught with any of her property so he left it or tossed it.
Innocent
Reasonable doubt 💯
if he didn't do it the circumstances are very damning, he suspect them cuts by the tire he was near plus there no other suspects on video in the area they would've seen him on all this video damn prosecution closed the shit out of this...GUILTY!!! HE EVEN KNOWS HES CAUGHT
Damn prosecution open the shit out of this case pointing straight to the real killer the ex Jeff great job people like you who think this black man did this lets me know you already without listen to the case had in your mind mjb is guilty just sad on all levels i pray the jury listen to the case and not just say mjb is guilty