Will the $60bn US military aid package turn the tide for Ukraine | FT

The FT's Christopher Miller explains how the US military aid is not a silver bullet for Ukraine and how the delay let Russia take advantage with its superior firepower and manpower to make incremental advances across the front line.
#ukraine #usmilitary #russia #ukrainewar #warinukraine #militaryaid
See if you get the FT for free as a student (ft.com/schoolsarefree) or start a £1 trial: subs.ft.com/spa3_trial?segmen....
► Check out our Community tab for more stories: / @financialtimes
► Listen to our podcasts: www.ft.com/podcasts
► Follow us on Instagram: / financialtimes'

[@misternevermiss12]

GIVE THEM EVERYTHING THEY NEED FFS

[@datsunlambchops4624]

They need men. You should go.

[@urbanobstacles]

Yeah no

[@misternevermiss12]

@@datsunlambchops4624 already here 😴

[@Palestineexists]

How about we take care of Americans. What happened with America First? Sending money for Zionists and Western Russians.

[@mayormccheese6171]

The money was never was for Ukraine. It is to keep American military contractors in the black for another year.

[@neres5795]

Actually only about 7% of all US weapon deliviries were aimed at Ukraine, most covering allies orders.

[@clean713]

Long live Russia!🇩🇪❤️🇷🇺

[@diagtula]

john already take its 10%

[@allanalegado5523]

Far too late, Ukraine will soon fall

[@misternevermiss12]

Been saying this for 2 years now 😴

[@snowtear8881]

No its about to go down 😮

[@clean713]

​@@misternevermiss12yea, because the west did support ukraine with weapons full through. Now the west is tired of ukraine lol and they stopped sending to much.
Did you really think Ukraine could have survived just with its own equipment?😂😂youre hilarious!

[@misternevermiss12]

@@clean713 no, obviously not. Why jump to such a conclusion?

[@andredeketeleastutecomplex]

I hope so.