4K vs 21:9 Ultrawide Monitors - Which is Better?!
Vložit
- čas přidán 13. 02. 2016
- 4K and Ultrawide monitors both have their advantages, but which would you prefer?
MS Tech Posters (best designs ever) - www.mstechshop.com
Twitter - / mstechyt
Instagram - / mstechyt
For Business Inquires - matthew.alex.schaefer@gmail.com
Song - Tobu - Seven [NCS Release]
Link - www.youtube.co.... - Věda a technologie
ultra-wide just looks 10x cooler lol
+Steven Van You also don't need a magnifying glass to read text
+Alex Hamilton Oh was I sposed to be reading, oh forgive me I was looking at her ummm....
+Alex Hamilton I don't need a magnifying glass on my 4k. You change the text size to 150% and it looks incredible. Text will look WAY sharper on a 4k.
+Craig Miller Not all apps scale properly. I am using 3x of this 4k monitor in this video.
Jack Burton yea but 3-4K monitors is also dope
No hateful comments directed towards others will be tolerated on this channel. I don't mean hate comments towards me, I mean those directed at other members of this community. If you choose to to make a discriminatory or cruel comment towards another, you will find yourself reported and banned. No exceptions.
+MS Tech Good :D
Be a man!
+MS Tech I wouldn't suggest banning, hateful comments may be filled with ignorance, but once in a while you may learn something. Keep up the good and helpful videos!
+Kermit lol
+Kermit no chill dude
How about a 5120x2160 21:9 Monitor ? :D
That would be 5120x2160, not 3840x2160
Alexander Vlasopoulos He edited it, before he said 3840x2160
+Brian Patrick van Oers correct ;)
Fiqih Trihanda i can barely watch 1080p videos with my shitty Internet ^^
+Fiqih Trihanda really? cus i watch youtube videos just fine on my 4k monitor on a 780 classified card. not even a 980 ti. it's your cpu that does the rendering for the videos and not the gpu.
Definitely rather the ultra wide ..I mean that 16:9 is now starting to look like a 4:8 after looking at the 21:9 ...looks blend
***** lol:) that's funny, you know what it is..16:9 is amazing forsure. But after seeing the 21:9, I almost feel like wow! 16:9 doesn't seem wide or cinematic anymore, its like standard. Is almost like how 1080p is the New norm. Can't even imagine when those 4k ultra wide panels start hitting the market, how amazing their going to look.
ultra wide looks so ridiculous. 16:9 is good enough where you don't have to turn your head to see everything.
4K Ultrawide 144Hz OLED 1Ms Response rate
possible with a small loan of a million dollars
+JealousBishop also curved!
+JealousBishop And also G-SYNC and FREESYNC at the same time
and two titan x's built in with a couple of 24000 mAh power banks in it for a wireless display support
and inbuilt usb hubs and bluetooth so u can keep ur pc in the other room too..
and
stop imagining its done now.
VTL I would love to see the link.
For the horizontal timeline thing, you actually get more of the timeline on the screen at a time with a 4k monitor than a 1440p ultra wide. 3840 > 3440. Depending on your UI scaling I guess.
But for most people, maybe dual 1080p is a lot cheaper and still capable of quite a few jobs?
For web browsing, just one window each monitor; for video editing, use one monitor solely for the timeline and another for everything else; for photo editing, place everything other than the photo on the second monitor; for gaming, monitor 1 for the game and monitor 2 for game guides XD
Just my personal experience though... By the way, 4 1080p monitors seems to be cheaper than a 4k.
Ultrawides still have a low DPI issue. Even the 1440p 34 inch ones look like 24 inch 1080p monitors to me.
Nay, what I do is use ultrawide resolutions on my 4k monitor. I usually play games at 3840x1440 or even 3840x1080. If you don't mind the black bars on the top and bottom (which you forget about when you start playing games) it's freakin awesome.
Ultrawide for everything is way better ... And the 3440x1440 to 4K it isn't such a big difference .... Gaming also on 21:9 is way better on every type of games Shooter , Racing games , and YEAH 3rd person and MMO games that we can see more world from up side . I was on 40 " 4K TV monitor with 23ms and going to LG 34UC98 was 10 times better . still I use 60 hz on the other hand :)
Mpamphs Kangourosaurous 60hz ain't bad, more is still better. though for some games its better to do 60hz, much less of a headache to deal with imo. especially Bethesda games.
I am happy with my Phillips 40 inch 4K monitor. I always thought that ultra wide screens needed more height, just felt like something's missing :-)
jokes on you i cant afford niether
pantuflacosmica lol
Your three main uses, web browsing, video, and photo editing... obviously benefit more from a 4K 16:9 screen since you simply get more pixels, higher PPI so crisper images, and more screen real estate.
My main uses for my computer are gaming, and watching movies.... so obviously my 21:9 3440x1440 @ 100hz benefits those things more due to cinema-equivalent 2.35:1 aspect looking amazing on it with no black bars, having a wider aspect ratio for games which is incredible, and better refresh rate than what is currently available on 4K screens.
So clearly it depends entirely on what you're using the computer for as to what you should go for. I think you made a great choice based on your usage, but for me I will definitely stick to my ultra-wide :)
There are so many wrong things here.
First of all you are comparing aspect ratio vs resolution.
Comparing different sizes of monitors.
Comparing monitors with different pixel counts (8294400 vs 4953600).
You will still have more editing space for videos on 4k monitor because of higher horizontal resolution (aspect ratio doesnt matter but the number of pixels)
Try comparing 32" 21:9 (3440x1440) vs 32" 16:9 (2560x1440)
Or by pixels 3440x1400 vs 2944x1656
Few more downsides are that 16:9 32" or up are just too large for desktops (category of tv's) while 21:9 can easily go 34" or more
Also 3440x1440 is much more easier on graphic card than 4k and still better than FHD
You could compare 2160p 21:9 vs 16:9 2160p when some monster of a graphic card comes that could handle it
Anyway you could just say bigger resolution is better
are there any 21:9 (5120x2160) monitors on the market? 4k is all about pixel dencity imho. so combining the 21:9 ratio and/or curvature cuz there are curved 21:9 screens with the pixel density of a 4k monitor should be a gold zone for enthusiasts.
Nope, best there is ATM is: 3840 x 1600 in the LG 38 inch ultrawide.
Which pixel density wise is the same as 34 inch 3440x1440. :)
Then what about a 4 k ultrawide?
+Banterinatoor 420 GG
;)
they dont exist....yet
here is 32 inch UHD 4K....awesome
www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16824236457&SortField=0&SummaryType=0&PageSize=10&SelectedRating=-1&VideoOnlyMark=False&IsFeedbackTab=true#scrollFullInfo
nope
So... 4k screen has 3840 horizontal pixels, the Ultrawide you mentioned also has 3840 horizontal pixels, but you say the Ultrawide would have more horizontal space? How exactly? You know that pixels matter, and not the physical size, right?
I just got an Ultra Wide monitor today, and the extra room on screen with Logic X is going to make it very useful, things could feel a little cramped before. really enjoying the width of it right now with normal applications.
is it just me or does he talk a bit like MKBHD? just the hand gestures and motions. nothing wrong with that just an observation haha
+Keith I feel like he is the opposite of him- blue and white theme instead of black and red
+Keith Even mimics the same facial and hand gestures.
+Keith So many tech youtubers do this. It's not a surprise whiteboy here tries the same.
Oh wow, I thought this same thing within the first 15 seconds.
gaming is definitely better on ultra wide because of that extra peripheral vision (FOV 120 instead of 90), it doesn't matter what type of game you're playing it's better, its also not as taxing as 4K which displays 8,294,400 pixels compared to 4,953,600, it's definitely something you have to consider but more importantly make sure your monitor has an IPS panel and g-sync(NVIDIA) or freesync(Radeon) seriously gaming's much better with g-sync or freesync because even when you have low FPS it's barely noticeable, its a much smoother experience
That wider FOV is just an optical illusion isn't it? It's not really there because both have the same number of pixels width wise.
no its not you actually see more on a ultrawide because of the aspect ratio of 21:9
I prefer 35" 21:9 2560x1080 because I'm used to working with the pixel density of 1920x1080 on a 27" screen and 2560x1080 on 35" gives me roughly the same density. It also gives me much better headroom for getting great FPS with awesome graphics settings in games. When comparing 2560x1080 (21:9) to 2560x1440 (+25%), 3440x1440 (+45%), 3840x2160 (+67%) and 4096x2160 (+69%) I don't think the extra pixels gives me anything I really need while the extra FPS I can get from 2560x1080 does.
I have an ASUS ROG Swift PG348Q (UWQHD) as my main monitor and ASUS ROG Swift PG27AQ (4K) as my secondary. I tested them both for gaming, and although the PG34 is pretty "valuable" at 1300€, it is the best investment I've ever made in regards of gaming. It's an absolute blast.
The monitor has G-Sync, 60-100Hz, ISP Curved Panel, 34 inches and 3440 x 1440 (21:9) resolution, which is the absolute best for gaming. Why? I tell you.
I tested them both, and the image on both monitors is almost the same, maybe even better on the ultrawide. Resolutionwise you can only see a difference when you turn down Anti Aliasing in games.
Now the huuuge pros for the Ultrawide:
-> Much, much wider view, bigger image, more immersion!
-> ~20% more performance on the ultrawide! You can have a bigger and just as good image on the ultrawide as the 4K, with an even better refreshrate!
Of course I could tell you over and over again how much "better" (it's pretty objective) Ultrawide is, but you really have to see it yourself, it's an experience, like the jump from 4:3 to 16:10/16:9! I personally can't wait for what's to come in the future, more and more games that come out now and came out this year already support 21:9, so don't be afraid of black bars, it's worth it!
***** What are you talking about... there's no confusion about any of this, and we weren't comparing resolution with aspect ratio. o.0
And you can't "hack registry" in order to get rid of black bars. You have to manipulate some INI files and even that sometimes doesn't work the way it's meant to be. However there's always a tool called "flawless widescreen".
Sooo yeah... what the hell?
Look for a program online that resize correctly some games that do not support 21:9 like Diablo 3.
What about Apple's 5K monitor on the 5K iMac?
I'm loving my LG 1440 ultrawide panel, I was wondering whether 4k screens support running in a letterbox mode that doesn't squash the content so that games can run natively in 21:9 and have the benefit of more viewing angle etc? Correct me if I'm wrong, but a 1440 ultrawide is basically a 4k with the top and bottom cut off? I'm still going to keep my ultrawide because the vertical real estate actually really irritates me, getting at menu bars and closing / minimising windows become a bit of a chore. another advantage for me (but not for everyone) is that I find the ultrawides are much less impactful on the feel of the room, the height of 4k monitors in 16:9 in a big enough size that's going to make any sense at that resolution just looks a bit clumsy and demands attention from the whole room. Great video though, I will be interested to see whether you switch back to 21:9 when the features catch up with conventional panels.
Just got my Acer x34 predator, soo happy with it! 3440x1440
Yeeeeeeuhhhh me too! This thing is disgusting, in the best possible way.
Props on your videos. You have a very logical and articulate way of carrying yourself, your setting is elegant, and all your information is portrayed well. Very classy. One question, what chair are you using? Do you like it?
4k ultra wide (flat and curved) are all over the place now so a 4k comp between 21:9 vs 16:9 would be really helpful nowadays. Thanks
Gaming in 4K or Ultra wide depends on the game, just like you said.
But it's not just the form factor.
Responce time in milliseconds (ms): How fast can it change from black to white and back to black.
Or as currently commonly known GtG (Grey to Grey). The lower this number the better it is for fast paced games.
Refresh rate in Hertz (Hz): Every gamer want to reach that magical number of 60Hz, or 60 FPS (Frames Per Second) and higher. All to ensure a smooth gameplay.
Syncronize: In order to prevent 'screen tearing' where the refresh rate of the Graphics card exceed the monitor, you get a broken line in your view. To fight this, many gaming monitors have either G-sync or AMD-freesync. so the monitor and GPU communicate with each other to match the framerate.
Needles to say, but G-sync only works with NVidea cards and Freesync on AMD cards :P
i actually think for rpgs (like witcher, skyrim, tomb raider, some horror games ...) is an ultrawide monitor actually more fun cause it gives you more atmosphere and better landscapes :)
Very informative video...I'm in this very predicament. I am looking to upgrade my 27" 1440P (16:9) monitor and am looking at either getting a 32" 4K 16:9 or a 34" 1440P 21:9 monitor. My question is regarding scaling. On a 1440P monitor, I have no scaling going on. Now, of course text is going to be smaller on a 4K, even at 32", but how much smaller is it? Do you use scaling? TIA.
where do you get the monitor has 9 inches tall ?? ( 1:38 )
as I have understood the common a monitor 34 inches ultra wide screen have
33.7" x 15.5" x 3.3"
So absolutely no mention on how you perceived the difference in resolution?
So I took some time to read the comments. thank you for waisting my time people. I came here to hear feedback on monitors and instead people are taking about their thoughts on someone's sexuality. It is real simple, not your business. If you stop trying to understand everything, you will realize it is easier to get alone. I don't need to understand why/how a person can be a homosexual, I just have to respect the person.
I have a setup with a 42" AH-IPS with two 34" 21:9 monitors on either side. I use a KVMP (Keyboard, Video, Mouse, Printer) switch to alternate between my work PC and my gaming PC. For productivity stuff, I love 4k. Eve if it’s just browsing windows, or going huge with a mega excel spread sheet. For gaming, I really think I like Ultrawide. I have a 6700k Dual GeForce 1080SLI that can actually drive my Ultra 4k, but I’m noticing that I start to get motion sick if I sit less than 2ft from my 4k monitor.
(Which I do for desktop stuff all day long). ALso, my neck does get a
bit sore from looking up at the angle to take in the top 20% of the 4k screen. I visit a chiropractor about once a week because my neck is getting all jacked up from my multi-monitor setup if I stare off at the three-o'clock position for 2 hours because I’m multitasking in my right screen. For as rarely as I use the top 20% of the 4k screen for production stuff (I tend to keep it within my natural peripheral vision), I think that an UltraWide would be the ideal if your are looking at a comparison to a 42" 4k. Now... if you are thinking about a 29", 32" or 35" 4k, I suspect it’s a different argument. But, the pixel size starts to get rather tiny for desktop stuff at that point. 42" 4K is the sweet spot for size and imagery.
I am not sure you are right about the shooter style of gaming. With a 21:9 monitor you would have a wider field of view but this would reduce your reaction time due to having to process more information before making a decision. I think that mmorpg's, slower paced games and simulators benefit more from the immersive experience of 21:9
just get a 4K 21:9 Ultrawide Monitors
You should have a "Stay Classy" poster :D
+Propz Will definitely make that!
+MS Tech I would love to see that :p
+MS Tech yo what's that webcam you use?
This video is exactly what I was thinking about recently. I have a 4K but thinking Ultrawide. Probably best to stick with the 4K for now.
Great vid dude. Keep it up!
I can't decide for the life of me to get this monitor or the lg 34UC98...I do some photo editing, but primarily its used for youtube, excel and web browsing. no gaming. I love how cool the widescreens look but not sure if i can take a step back from 4k.
You earned a sub my friend! You deserve way more subs than what you have now!
if i wasnt worried too much about mixing resolutions for the eventual fix for nvidia surround to allow it to work monitors of simmilar res and differant aspect ratios i would have gotten only one rog PG278q and an ROG PG27aq (the 4k variant) instead, so i have jigh refreshrate 1440p for games like CSGO, gorgeous 21:9 for games like witcher 3 as well as video editing and productivity and 4k for photo editing and 4k 16:9 content (if i didnt already have the TV for 4k netflix and stuff)
cant wait for ultrawide 4k monitors
Kinda new to your channel. I love the decency in your videos. "Stay classy". Great video.
i tested 34 inch ultrawide curved monitor, i must say it was nice. but after i tried a 16:9 4k 27 inch. i found out it was more relaxing to use the 27 inch.
@MS Tech....you are right that 4k is the future however in the present 21:9 is the way to go for these reasons:
1. Movie watching will look a lot better on 21:9 on widescreen movies which almost every movie that has come out is in.
2. 4k is still a novelty and especially on a screen smaller than 30" you wont be able to tell the difference from a 1080p.
3. 4k is constantly improving due to new standards such as HDR and HDMI 2.0 so most current 4k monitors cant handle both those specs.
4. For gaming 4k is currently unsupported by graphics cards, good luck getting 30 fps on 3840x2160.
5. Newer games are coming out instead in 21:9 such as league of legends which allows wider views which 4k cant address.
6. 4k displays tend to be more expensive than 21:9 screens.
I bought three ultrawide to be used solely for gaming. Still waiting for it to be delivered though. I could have bought a fourth one as an accessory display, luckily they were out of stock. I might buy a 4K as an accessory display now. Nice overview btw.
Does anyone knows the brand of that mouse? Which model/brand is that mouse?
Great comparison btw, I've kept both UW and 4K, 4K works better for PS.
i'd only consider 4K (1) if I used a mac for my work (they handle font scaling better) and (2) if ultrawide didn't exist.. I'm sure there's a use case for 4K, but whatever it is - i don't use it
I dig the stands on your studio monitors, where'd you find them?
I don't know why we can't have a 4k ultra wide already, I have a 4k tv that is setup for a high end htpc. I absolutely LOVE it, the crispness is hard to explain if you just haven't seen it. At the same time I have a Asus i7 laptop with a nvidia 1060 in it, I have a 21:9 monitor hooked up to it, and I really like it, but with a 34 inch screen it's really starting to show the pixels. Smaller screens you probably wouldn't notice, but with ultra wides you really need a VERY large screen or the height of the monitor looks really small.
so i might be copping me one of these in the next few days and was just wondering how streaming online videos and watching TV goes on this, like.. is it that bad? (mainly going to be using it for Music Production,Browsing,Watching Tv Shows and a LITTLE bit of gaming)
YAY you changed the font!Thanks for listening to your subscribers!
is it ultrawide monitor worth it for music production with Cubase?
Hey idk if this is a me thing but I've never really been interested in anything pat 1440 I have a 1080p monitor and have seen a qhd display before. Yeah it's nice but I don't really get the need for it. I do understand a ultra wide though. Is a 4k monitor one of those things you have to actually see to understand?
So far great name re branding! Now to change your profile picture :D Its been there FOREVER!
We just need to wait 1 more years and we will have a 4k and ultrawide in one monitor (2in1) :D
I just got an ultra wide monitor. Acer predator X34. And I freaking love it. I don't do any editing of any kind but do, do a lot of web browsing, youtube/netflix, and gaming. Right now, I mostly play MMOs like world of warcraft and star wars the old republic and also playing a bit of star wars battlefront and the newer tomb raider games. I don't think the genre of the game matters at all - on an ultra wide aspect ratio, FPS, MMO, whatever it doesn't matter - it is too awesome, it can't be beat. However, some games don't work perfectly well at that aspect ratio, or even at all, in which case obviously id rather have a 16:9 monitor. But, outside of SWTOR, all the games I listed above work flawlessly ultra wide. The extra horizontal, perifial real estate, without bezels is amazin. And 4k monitors can't do above 60 fps right now, plus pretty much every single card solution out there right now will only get you 45 to 50 fps anyway.
by "every single card solution" i mean the very best single graphics card will only get you those amount of FPS with settings turned all the way up, on the most graphically demanding games today.
just a thought but why you compare a resolution to an aspect ratio compare one to one and one to another
Matt, stay classy. Ban whom you want, because those of us who appreciate and benefit from your insightful videos will stick around. Something tells me that your future does not depend upon your CZcams audience, and so your insistence upon standards of decorum and 'class' will simply ensure that your current audience remains loyal. I agree with one comment ... offer posters for sale with your logo and the "Stay Classy" catchphrase, you have a buyer here. Great job, young man!!
hi there, How about watching movies? Which is better for blue rays. Subscribed:)
how you do not do gaming when you own a tech channel?
Exactly the type of comparision I was looking for! Good vid
Dude, you know that the 4k has more res than the ultra wide and what you think is more room, is not. It's all in your head. first the 4k is smaller so any comparison is in error by 2 inches. you might not think that means much but it should.
what photo editing software are you using? To me it didn't look like Photoshop.
Out of interest, I'm currently trying to sell my Asus pg348q ultra-wide monitor, how and where did you sell yours? If you did indeed sell it at all?
hi and glad i found your channel, would you still recommend this monitor ? i do video editing and productivity apps .. looking for this size category, price no object.
thank you :)
I use a 42 inch TV for editing. A little pixely up close, but the amount of workspace is heavenly!
+Tim McGovern A cheap Seiki 42" 4K is better then some outrageously priced 4K monitor.
Exactly. Mine is 1080p right now, but that's my next planned upgrade. It's not great for gaming and color accuracy could be better, but it's worth the massive amount of workspace.
+Tim McGovern But you actually don't really get more workspace. Everything just becomes bigger.
Goyomojo Tech Exactly. More physical workspace is what I mean. Since everything's bigger, I need less pixel-for-pixel real estate per window.
haha Im using a 27inch 4k. Works really well for me
I'm using a 42" UHD TV as a monitor. Give me the higher res any day. Aspect ratio isn't that important to me as long as it's a reasonable ratio. Besides, that UHD monitor can be turned into an ultra wide simply by masking the top and bottom of the display.
And the ultrawide can be turned into 16:9 by letterboxing. Not why you want it though.
That's true. But at the size of display I'm talking about the 16:9 display encompasses the 21:9 display. So I will take the greater number of pixels if the price is similar. In your scenario, you would be getting a smaller display by adding pillars on the left and right.
Kobayashi Maru True. Depends on the price though, and right now, ultrawide monitors are relatively more expensive than 16:9 monitors, so you are correct :-)!
Thanks for your tips and sharing your experience. Keep posting.!
but if i dont want to spend a lot of money on 4k should i just buy like dell 1080p or and ultrawide? i mean 25 inch lg ultrawide
25 inch ultra wide is actually pretty small, go for a 24 or 27 inch regular modek
ok thank you
+Martinesse I was initially going for the 25" LG Ultrawide, ended up picking the 29" version instead. You'll love it, especially if you game on your computer. If you don't, you will enjoy the full size windows side-by-side, productivity, and multi-tasking.
+Zuby A maybe will save some money and get it
sweet monitors both of them, the ultra wide and 4K. I like the size of 32in. I use a 32inch 1080p TV for my PC monitor. I don't do video editing or photo editing much. For my price budget I want to get the Vizio M series 4K TV for my PC monitor, as it is under $1000 and is bigger than 32in.
Hi, I have a question what do you think is better a 4k monitor or an ultra wide for programming, study, systems administration etc. Im studing informatic and systems engineering.
I'd go with dual monitor setup for extra productivity. Or if you prefer having just one monitor go for ultrawide. No need for extra resolution in your case. It's better to have more work space than more pixels especially for writing reports or programming
I'm new in monitors and i want use one of them
so I'm searching of 4k curved monitor 27inch with cheaper price
which one do you recommend it for me
I've had both and I'll say movies/ games = ultra wide. Productivity, editing, animation, youtube, desktop use= 4K
Someone has to make a 4k ultrawide monitor for Matt.
Use a custom resolution via CRU or Nvidia control panel to turn a 4k screen into a 21:9 image if you absolutely need ultrawide.
what is the thing plugged in to the front panel usb on your computer?
Love your new intro Matthew :D
Higher resolution always wins. What is a few pixels on a higher res screen might not even be showing on a lower resolution screen. THAT'S an advantage.
what about 3 4k monitors vs 1 ultrawide?
Is the resolution jump to 4K noticeable?
Whats the scaling level you are using with this under Windows 10? 125%
Conclusion: McD - "Im lovin' it"
Great comparison tho.
Spot on mate. Using an UW is a joke when you can just get a larger 4k of the same width.
Ms Tech: buys 3 to 4 4K or 1440p monitors and switches between them
Me: using a 1337x768 laptop monitor
Wat ._.
This monitor is awesome! Sick video Matt :)
nice graphic examples for explaining 16:9
This is why all rich people should have an ultrawide curved monitor in the middle and a 5k monitor on each side surrounding it #SetupGoals
if i lower the res to 1440p will the refresh rate be over 60hz?
I have a question. What is the best cheap vlogging camera and the best cheap video editing laptop?? Great video by the way!!😄
Hey what Desk do you have in this video!?
What do you think is the perfect size for a 4K monitor?
32 inch. No scaling problems. Lower sizes you get higher DPI though.
What is the model number for your Ben Q 4k?
It bothers me that you are pitting (at least is speech) a resolution (4K) against an aspect ratio (21:9). Why couldn't you just title it like this: "16:9 VS 21:9 Ultrawide Monitors - Which is Better?!"?
Since i own the lg monitor you had i am assuming you must enjoy not having that much lightbleed on your screen :D
Hi what is the chair you have? Thanks
My perfect monitor would be something like this:
4K, IPS, 120 Hz, curved.
Same here. Don't forget somewhat affordable, because the predator X34A comes close, but is very expensive...
***** extra milk, please.
you made a mistake should have kept the ultra wide
I feel the same. After some minor issues with the ACER Predator, I sent it back. Seeing all the horror stories with quality control, I got a refund and bought a Samsung 4K. No regrets at all. 4K is more of an upgrade from 1080p.
Thoughts on the LG ultrawide 4k?
What do you think about a 4K ultrawide monitor scaled right? which would be 5040x2160 ?
***** Wouldnt it be 3840/16*21 = 5040?
***** but thats not how it works lol..