funny how int stans always saying that kpop fetishize young girl everytime theres a cute concepts but when koreans themselves have a problem with that suddenly its okay and its not fetishism lol
Bruh what? Lolita doesn’t fetishize kids aesthetics. Sure, there has been people who have done it within the Lolita community but that doesn’t mean ALL lolitas are like that.
Well lolita itself is related to sex or seduction. Lolita is a 1955 novel written by Russian-American novelist Vladimir Nabokov that addresses the controversial subject of hebephilia.
I think thry need to start learning differences between LOLITA fashion(which has nothing to do with the book) and coquette and nypmphette fashion(which is based mostly on thr movie)
Ppl rrly be finding anything to be angry about like damn 😭😭 let them breathe their just bloomers and beside I think their kinda going towards the whole Lolita theme. Lolita's fashion isn't fetishizing children, it's a long and complicated history just use goggle instead of trying to find issues with literally anything
@@xxxx-re2sp Only the name is the same. Plus, the name Lolita wasn't invented by Nabokov's novel and is a real nickname that real people have. Of course that doesn't mean that the fashion is the same as the novel or even remotely similar, but I think it's pretty hard to deny the possibility that the name of the fashion was inspired by the novel, even just a little.
funny how int stans always saying that kpop fetishize young girl everytime theres a cute concepts but when koreans themselves have a problem with that suddenly its okay and its not fetishism lol
So true.
Why are we looking thrre anyways, shows why theyre there
they legal in alabama
i think that's because they will fit their concept and cute outfits
yeah! weren't the netizens the ones who were complaining about the safety shorts looking bad?
Well if it's associated with lolita then it's not good. Search lolita if you don't know
I love lolita fashion
Bruh what? Lolita doesn’t fetishize kids aesthetics. Sure, there has been people who have done it within the Lolita community but that doesn’t mean ALL lolitas are like that.
Well lolita itself is related to sex or seduction. Lolita is a 1955 novel written by Russian-American novelist Vladimir Nabokov that addresses the controversial subject of hebephilia.
Aleast they have safety shorts on?!?
I think thry need to start learning differences between LOLITA fashion(which has nothing to do with the book) and coquette and nypmphette fashion(which is based mostly on thr movie)
Ppl rrly be finding anything to be angry about like damn 😭😭 let them breathe their just bloomers and beside I think their kinda going towards the whole Lolita theme. Lolita's fashion isn't fetishizing children, it's a long and complicated history just use goggle instead of trying to find issues with literally anything
of all the things kpop netizens love to complain about, this is the most touch grass complaint in a minute.
I don’t doubt that that is what the company was going for
Some Korean people need to learn that the Lolita fashion has nothing TO DO with the novel.
Lolita novel is where lolita comes from 😂
@@xxxx-re2sp Only the name is the same. Plus, the name Lolita wasn't invented by Nabokov's novel and is a real nickname that real people have.
Of course that doesn't mean that the fashion is the same as the novel or even remotely similar, but I think it's pretty hard to deny the possibility that the name of the fashion was inspired by the novel, even just a little.
The should copy nj safety shorts
its to match their dreamy concepts
It’s still better with those stafety shorts than none
fair enough but why are they looking their ???
????