Murder and Perceptions, A Country Where People Can Kill Others (Kino's Journey)
Vložit
- čas přidán 10. 12. 2019
- The first episode of Kino's Journey takes on a pretty wild ride making us doubt our own ideas and thoughts, but could it actually be the best country to live?
Thanks For Watching! Please Like and Subscribe and share your opinions in the comments!
Follow me on Twitter: / thedubbedcasual
Thank you to the wonderful YvetArts for doing all the artwork you see on the channel!: / _y_ve_ta_rts
1am Anime Playlist: • 1am Anime
What Anime Says About YOU Playlist: • What Anime says about ...
Why I Love Playlist: • Why I Love
Cartoon Casuals Playlist: • Cartoon Casuals
WHY DOES THIS EXIST Playlist: • WHY DOES THIS EXIST?! - Zábava
It's simple really. There are no laws against killing in that country, hence the only way to make sure that you will not be killed is to be kind and not be an ass. Because yeah no law will protect anyone against being killed by you, which also means that there are no laws protecting you from being killed.
Well said
So basically the country is the streets itself if you know what I mean
a double edged sword
so basically....the principles behind the 2nd amendment in the USA, walk softly, yet carry a big stick
By making it such that the injunction against murder is kept on no law book, but on the hearts of the people, it ensures that murder will only be used as a preventative measure to keep the bad apples in check. Think of all the arguments the people against guns make, and realize that the places THEY live are often the most violent and deadly, while the people they denigrate live in places where violence is rare, and when guns are used against the innocent, more often then not the guns of the innocent are used against them in defense.
When those who would harm the public realize that they will be killed the moment they violently step out of line, they learn to either behave, or be removed. It's an entire nation run on the 'castle' doctrine.
I saw it more literally. The episode tells us that even if a country or city has a bad, sometimes dangerous reputation doesn't automatically make the general population bad or dangerous.
It's dangerous alright, but not for me. *Draws gun*
Yeah kind of.
@@whannabi or Latam
Well, also consider that a lot of the people who go there probably go there specifically go there to murder and take advantage of what looks like a lax law. Some of them probably make it out and then spread the idea that the country is more dangerous than it is. If you go there and just don't cause problems, you're probably gonna be fine.
This is where laws actually compliment social values which is the whole purpose of laws.
@Gage King The reason i said that was because it was a 100% agreement consensus. Not a majority and minority existence like the united states does. Which in turn creates tension' a good example was the previous election and current.
In reality there will be a lot of rival families, clan, or groups , and there will be a lot of civil war society will be messed up af Imagine How hard it is to have a job or even walk onto your nearest Walmart if that's the case
@@viktornikolayevich5933 if the law had been enforced impartially, then over a sufficiently long time the amount of murder will get saturated. Meaning those who perky wanted to kill be purged like in video. If one family/gang wanted to rule then they will be target of everyone else. Until the society is formed in the harmony that we see
But the question is can the law survive the turmoil times being impartial and if the people outlive the turmoil themselves.
Clearly this country is an example of a society which achieved it.
@@akarshjv6999 broo its easier said than done there's a 10,000 religions in the world , millions of cultures ,millions of environment, millions of ideologies
It's not just one country with size smaller then a city with one backgrounds which is cowboys in this one
@@akarshjv6999 don't forget about big companies, or as basic as vegans lifestyle which is turning into a cult right now
it's far more complex then just "Then over sufficiently long time"
Never considered the citizens as cultists, seemed more like citizen soldiers or citizen police. Only problem would be what happens in private away from the public, then again that's already how things work.
The brilliant part is that its reputation encourages troublemakers into the open allowing for quick cleanup. It has to be almost routine for them.
Actually the majority of them are all criminals of some sort.
@@The_Evening_Sun but they changed their ways well most sins can't be redeemed but atleast striving to become a better person is better than keep doing those sins
@@shouldi9283 oh definitely, my point was simply that they're not doing it to have a sort of citizen police force but rather they made the rule with the intention that it would keep themselves and others in check, by knowing that if they accidentally slipped back into their old ways they'd be taken care of by their fellows.
“Humans are unpredictable and interesting creatures” - Someone probably
I'd personally say that "Human nature is so predictable yet so chaotic."
Me🖐🏼
Ryo from deathnote
Sounds like something a alien would say
Korekiyo, Danganronpa
Reading the comments really goes to show how thought-provoking this all is. I like the atmosphere this video has fostered.
Thots provoking indeed
The only reason I'd settle their is because they serve a large piece of cake.
There*
It’s kinda weird how there’s people correcting grammar in comments like they’re some kind of grammar god.
Can’t they just mind their own business since most of those mistakes are from autocorrect?
I guess they can’t?
They’re too busy seeking recognition and pointing out other people’s mistakes.
A sad world we live in.
But the mistake was so easy to avoid, it just looks REAL bad...
@@kriptionite8412 that looks real bad?
Wow.... a perfectionist
As long as the sentence constructed is understandable, then it’s fine
@@Schniffers you're a hypocrite.
It was nice allegory presenting that people don't need authorities. Because we are naturally social creatures that need to live in group.
Rules like:
-don't kill
-don't steal
-don't rape
-don't cheat
Those rules will exist in every society. People will instinctively form groups and societies. There will always be some law and order. Strict law, will not make citizens safer as rules like this will exist always.
Do you know that innocent people can died because vigilante ?
hellatze there wouldn’t be vigilantes if authorities figures actually do their job the thing is they don’t, they clean up after. (Prompting vigilantes to arrive)
@@Sam-vw4ks Big BIG facts
And if they dont follow.
WE KILL THEMMM
In London's history, before the police, the city had a long policy to let the citizens help themselves. The idea was that when somebody did something criminal, the citizens would stop the criminal and handle the criminal themselves. But there were problems in that policy.
An armed society is a polite society. The great equalizer works when everybody has an overwhelming force on their side.
Politely screwed up. Its kind of weird seeing people having pieces of metal hanging off their dong
It’s why we have the second amendment in the first place.
@@theheroneededwillette6964 Enemy invasion, drug dealers, Bandits. Guns are amazing.
@@TheSquidPro self defense from that kind of crap is very important.
@@yondabigman4668 it's not weird, it's comforting
What an interesting country, but not that far off from many states in the US. I live in Iowa a stand your ground state that allows easy purchase and carrying of guns to defend yourself. I myself always carry a gun yet never want to shoot anyone but just like the people in the country wouldn't hesitate to if it was to defend someone or myself. While there are definitely nuances that make this country more safe and allow it to be different and perhaps safer from the US. Many things such as no trial or legal action for killing does certainly raise many questions about society and morals. What an interesting concept, its similar to our real lives yet it goes just a tad bit further.
The only real difference about this anime and the US is that Murder isn’t illegal, or at least “Not permitted”, the US is “prohibits Murder unless _____” Usually the blank is filled with Self defense.
Cept they do hesitate. Even in most 2nd Amendment state we still have mass shoots. A good guy with a gun is pretty much just a fantasy.
A judge is just a normal person like you and I that dresses himself up in spooks of authority. He is no more just than others, but has merely spent time following the dogmatic beliefs of the legalsystem.
@@konata736 not really since 3 million crimes are stopped each year by a person defending themselves with a gun. The media will never tell you that a lot of tragedies were stopped by weapons because that doesn’t fit the narrative.
@@supergamergrill7734 that number comes from an estimate published in 1995 by criminologists Gary Kleck and Marc Gertz. one of the big criticisms against this was that their estimate was over twice the number of people killed and/or treated for gunshots combined. Its a well known problem in Epidemiology that if somethings a rare event, and you just to ask how many people have done said thing, you'll get incredibly high overestimates.
Some dude paranoidly flashing his firearm at some dude crossing the street isn't "stopping a crime", for instance, but Kleck was still counting shit like that.
Of course, its hard to find evidence against gun ownership being good... but thats because since the mid 90's Congress has put restrictions in place that effectively block agencies from supporting gun-violence research.
"The Media" won't tell you that part though.
I just love how they turn his exact argument against him. He thinks nobody should care that he's gonna kill someone since it's legal, without realizing they can just as easily kill him because, well, it's legal!
Oh the irony.
"Not prohibited" does not equate to "permitted"
*_jaw began to drop right there_*
Murder could not be prohibited in this town,
But if you try to exert your right to kill , you could be killed in return, that way criminals and murderers could understand their actions and consequences, while being treated as prey, it‘s a good bait
Law doesn’t represent social order and vice versa in simplified form.
A country where murder is legal but morality is reinforced by the people not a corrupt government.
“Evil people can do good things
And
Good people can do evil things
There are no Good or Evil in this world just people
People are infinite like water they can have infinite actions and words.
But in this world there is just People going about there lives
I don’t believe in the concept of good and evil but I believe in life” Sun Tuzu
... you... do realise that the reason governments can be corrupted is because they are made up of people?
People who would be no less prone to corruption just because there's no big government for them to work around?
Just look up the Witch Hunts to see how well that works out. Or the Wild West, for that matter.
@@Siathuan people aren’t perfect, in every age there will always be good people and bad people
Crimes are bad but they can also be Justified.
Ooh that's shits fire as ffuck
@@Siathuan you didn't get the point at all young man. Learn to listen and be less reactionary
@@darththunderstorm6331 true; law and moral are not necessarily the same. Just because it is legal doesn't make it ethical, and just because it is ethical doesn't mean it's legal.
I see this as a MAD(like the one between US and USSR) between every single citizen.
A town inhabited by former killers who wants a simple life, has a delicate and dynamic balance. When something crosses the line, everyone else crosses as well to kill the problem maker, making this a self rightening town, a system only possible because every single citizen is a retired killer, thus impossible to replicate in the real world.
i watched the original and was looking for this scene and you made me more excited to watch this version of kinos journey
damn they do keep their rifles by their sides.
Some home guard/militia units in Europe used to do that. Or you have some place out in the woods where the local platoon stores their stuff.
One of the ways to get illegal weapons in the 70's and 80's was to break open a home guar depot so they've moved from little concrete boxes to more central depots.
And rifles are heavy! People don't want to paint fences or pick apples with a rifle on the back day in and day out. A lot of these guys don't seem to own rifles either. But two dudes up in a window with crossbows is still pretty threatening.
If armies forage in a really hostile land, they had armed foraging parties. For every forager you have a few armed and armoured people who don't work but only work security.
That moment when the DUB feels right:
Me: I must be going nuts, me liking DUB?
It is okay to like anime dubs, I think they have come a long way.
Some anime dubs do a great job
Some anime it's the standard to listen in dub. Like Yu yu Hakusho or Cowboy bebop
@@Highzen they've been good since dragonball z and full metal alchemist
@@chriskoloski32 Black Lagoon, Michiko and Hatchin, Samurai Champloo are good examples too!! 😁
Favorite quote in fallout “ an armed society is a polite society.”
Ive heard that in gta too
Reaistically, it would be a nation where entire families, and their relatives, are slaughtered in blood feuds. And where people are killed over relatively small disagreements, before they can explain themselves. One good thing about courts and checks and balances, is that people can take their time to investigate fault, rather than jumping to conclusions, or being manipulated into a mob killing.
On that note, I'd like to see the mayhem that erupts when the mob disagrees, strongly, about whether to kill someone.
I like that self defense is taken as a personal responsibility and that the whole community takes up that responsibility, but I find it troubling that there is no court system.
Maybe, but I don't think it necessarily is the case that it would evolve into mass slaughter and blood feuds. That country is noted as being "Not very big", that along with each country in Kino no tabi being more akin to a city state would put that countrys population at maybe 10-100 thousand. I would guess that in that country everyone more or less knows everyone else. I also thinks the knowledge that everyone in the country caries weapons and coulld kill you without remorse, encourages diplomatic solutions.
If I were to kill someone, their friends, family, neighbors etc would come after me armed to the teath. That could as you say lead to blood feuds and clan wars. But i think the threat of complete anarchy is enough to keep the peace in this case. I also think that might be why they so fiercly protect the community from those that might do it harm.
It's not a perfect system and i don't think it would work in our modern society, but in a feudal/medieval one ... maybe.
@@blomman1719 Blood feuds were certainly a big factor in the number of homicides in ancient civilizations. That's why courts and laws were so important, so those who were wronged had a system to seek retribution instead of murdering an entire household.
@@marfin4325 I agree that courts are important. I didn't know that blood feuds were that common in ancient civilization, so thank you got the information.
I still fell like that country could work. BUT that depends on the people in it. In the end of the episode Kino meets a man that came from a violent country were he had been forced to kill in order to survive. A person that was tired of violence and just wanted a peaceful life. In a country full of people like that this might work.
@@marfin4325 Could the capability for violence be a factor in that difference too? As in, in ancient times it was more difficult to kill someone, like you had to be either strong or crafty to do so, and in inequal states between the familys they could think they would have no repercursions from killing or attempting to kill everyone, im not sure i explained myself too well, let me paint a picture
There are two families of 5, the first one only has one man, the second one has two men, the man from the first family killed one of the men of the second one, and in retaliation the other man from the second one killed the first man, and in a blood rage or whatever decided to kill the rest of the first family, and he can do so because the risk of repercursion is lower or minimal, since kids and women would be easier to kill than a fighting man (since men were seen as the capable to kill because of their strength)
In todays time we now have access to guns, which invalidate the strength requirement to kill someone, and thus killing is accesible to everyone, so now the man would have to weight the risk of any other member of the family fighting back, and short of being stupid, would probably decide against further action instead of just trying to kill everyone, if anything, he may not even kill the man out of fear of reprisals, hell, maybe there wouldnt havent been a murder at all
Of course my hypothetical is also an ideal scenario, maybe one member of any of the families is just crazy and just goes killing because it wants to, and maybe the other is too scared to fight back, but the existence of a mutual level of threat is already a good deterrent, like another comment said, this on a world scale already works and is the reason we have peace, i think at country level this wouldnt work because it needs a certain level of unity in society that is hard to maintain country wide, but in a town or city scale it probably could work well, since there is already a sense of unity just from seeing each other faces their whole lives
TLDR: i think the fact that murder is easier for everyone disuades one individual from killing, and if it were applied to ancient civlizations, a court system would not have existed since there would be no need for it, under threat of mutually assured destruction, people would naturally try to seek diplomatic solutions
Basically, be humble and respectful, don't commit any crimes, and don't disturb the peace.
There are no crimes. The thing he did was attack someone, which is frowned upon, just not illegal. It’s like how free speech isn’t the same thing as free from consequences of speech
@@DeathnoteBBIn this guy's case it was best just to keep his mouth shut.
@@lonesoul663 Well yeah, but obviously he thought the citizens wouldn’t care. He was incorrect.
Nice video! It seems like an interesting anime to watch 🖤
If everyone's a predator, there will be no prey. If everyone knows how to use a gun, a sword, a means of defense, yet chooses not to, is the meekest place on Earth.
There's always gonna be someone with a bigger gun or team. There will always be prey
I feel other ppl might agree and its a good thing sounds like peace to others but as i see how about false accusation? Yes they can think as one as citizens but criminality is also flexible how about a citizen moved in and then town trusted him/her until she was keeping a secret to do bad things like kill someone without revealing him/herself. Of course ppl will estimate and think by votes and one but i can assure not all of em are verry smart to pin point out the suspect that may lead to start againt false accusation then kill them until the crime is continuing. Ppl might get insanity barely accusing everyone. Ever heard of salem history and old europe where witch beliefs exist, the results of their actions might be similar to this.
Where can i find this anime anyway i cant find any source? Love the plot tho but i just pointed out for those who thinks that its ideal town but for me maybe they were in a trajedy before making themselves into this situation but good, bad; right, wrong; true, false; should , and shouldnt are just moral ambiguity and flexible not enough to justify an action hence its not peace at all. Gaining freedom acquires responsibility therefore freedom is not freedom at all
(Ps. Sorry if it sounds nonsense)
Those are good points, Kino's Journey tries to bring up questions and problems like that with each new country. You can stream it on Funimation!
It looks like they have an informal leadership. The little old "alderman" that sits down to have a chat with Kino. Clans and village sociteties often have informal or consensus-backed leaders. You got your council of family elders, your local reeve, the alderman etc.
True that the real life examples of dark ages and salem witch trials happened with mob lynching happened when people tries to enforce their own morality.
But here, everyone's a retired killer. No one's good and everyone' a witch except their own perceived ideal of 'goodness'.
Instead, it seems more like a typical society where your own safety is your own responsibility and the person with the faster reflex wins or the one with a larger group wins or the one who gets away with it wins kind of deal.
@@ZackTanTYZ so it's kinda like the "survival of the fittest, only the strong survive".
@@grass5697 Despite how it looks, it always has been.
Violence is not the answer it's question and the answer is yes
Libertarian paradise
I just want to know if I can tell my neighbours not to do little nuisance things. Can I tell a bloke to not feed a bear or divert rainwater and the many other little ease-of-life laws we got.
I'd like to think that there's specific rules genetically engraved into our systems. Basic rules of living you know? Don't touch the giant cat that can rip your arm off. Don't walk off of cliffs, shit like that. 😅
@@michelveilleux1275 It's not engraved. You need to dress down people now and then for small things like that.
Yes... willing to kill for freedom and peace turn it off. ... kill your oppressors
Because when everyone has a deadly weapon and trained to use it, everyone has no choice but to be polite
This entire video is a textbook example of why the American Second Amendment is so important, it enables you to protect yourself and those around you.
Damn why haven’t I heard this show before
This country is basicaly a single team fighting game with friendly fire on! :D
I like the OST you have deliberately used.
this is genius, i love it.
In summary: killing and murdering do not mean the same thing.
Nice Video!
This episode reminds me of Hercule Poirot, Murder on the orient express.
Thats a big over simplification. The killer here didn't kill anyone yet or know the group plus in the book the guy was murdered in the night not in broad daylight.
I feel like the town knows that they are able to kill each other with no consequences but just don't do it. Why? Well they all know each other really, but for travellers they would always take that opportunity to kill someone. And if the town sees someone try to do it, they'll basically just kill them.
All in all, shut up and don't try to find the loophole in situations.
Beautiful, indeed.
Just because you could kill someone doesn’t mean you should. It’s like saying you can yell in public but you don’t have to because you know it isn’t necessary to yell in public. Also everyone has a weapon and has knowledge of how to kill another person. So in a weird way they understand each other and are able to come to an equal ground.
This also goes into great detail about the mindset of legalizing guns in general. Guns were made to kill people better, faster, and more efficiently. But now that war is over, guns are either a recreational use, such as a fun time at the shoot range, or home defense, and self defense.
If America was a country where guns were fully legal, and in the situation that everyone had one, and knew the safety of handling one. A person like the one mentioned in the video, wouldn't have the chance to misuse it. But, we are humans, and we are far from perfect, so this fictional piece doesn't hold up in reality. Maybe in a small town, but that's all I'm seeing that this would actually work.
The world works on this idea though. Everyone in the high forms of government has nuclear weapons that could wipe millions of people off this earth, and that weapon is why we all live in peace today, because if anyone caused a ruckus, or tried anything dastardly, the entire world could fall into a nuclear winter.
the world of kino in some form is kinda alternate reality of that. kinos world as you watch/read of each city its heavily hinted a world war did happen long ago (if correct approx 100-120 years ago in that sea city and the AI governing it told about it.) that it caused alot of damage and ppl were scare. the cities with large walls, mobile or hidden were made to protect the ppl and stand off against potential invaders. each city in its history were built on any inventions/experiments formed like kino home city. ppl were at the start of being a teen are urged to go through a surgery to be a "respectable" adult but its actually (if using term right) lobotomizing them to be obedient and follow orders by who ever in charge. this assumes the city long ago forced civilians to become obedient solders, follow the commander and die even if say the commander order you to jump into a mine field. the AI floating city existed to get the children long ago during the war away from it with plans to return and drop them off but the children that became adults became to reliant on the AI and decide to stay even though the war is over. the AI program to keep them safe decides so be it let them stay and hundred years later the city is decaying and one day those ppl will drown and die.
some of them are good, bad, advance, still old fashion or even futuristic depending on the knowledge and resources they city had from the war years and develop it when it ended. the world is filled with the unknown, terrifying, wonderful sights and discovery. its peaceful but deadly at the same time with anything can be out of the ordinary (like the battle sheep) to perfect clear day. its reason this world setting ppl liked about it and hopefully see more of it either novel, manga and anime. or with trend now these days in america if get license to make a live action series on netflix or another at least make it an anthology series with each episode the viewer is unprepared to see what is shown and goes down in this world.
It seems more like a typical society where your own safety is your own responsibility and the person with the faster reflex wins or the one with a larger group wins or the one who gets away with it wins kind of deal. It's just that the group with better intentions are the winners this time.
@@ZackTanTYZ it depends of what good intentions means, there are a lot of genocides started with the best intentions for a country, a group, a religion.
And that's why you can't make it fully legal. You said this: Guns were made to kill people better, faster, and more efficiently.
The situation that everyone had one and knew the safety of handling one, is a fantasy scenario, also you can't expect that everyone have the value of a peaceful life or good intentions.
And also, we have the nuclear weapons, but we understanded what a threat was just after being used againts people. That form of terror and war crimes is what stopped the world to fall into another war, not the weapon itself. The delusion was how the goverments keept improving a way to destroy us all, afecting more innocent people in the way.
In that fear of the destruction of humanity, Gojira was born as a protest againts proliferation of nuclear weapons.
@@chikitronrx0 @Pablo Alberto Chavez Miranda You're right and wrong. Think of the example of herd immunity in vaccines. Most of the population has them, but the few can't get them because of an allergy. I assure you, that most people can be educated on proper gun safety, and understand it. Most people wouldn't even get the chance to use it on another person. Again, it's a fear tactic. 'Don't endanger the lives around you, and your life won't be in danger.'
Your opinion of the average person is quite low, and I don't think you are giving them the benefit of the doubt. How can you say that the 'majority'of people do not have good intentions, and proper testing can rule those people out.
Your take on nuclear weapons being a different example than guns isn't set on a solid foundation. People are well aware already even without training on how dangerous a gun can be when used.
The criteria that would be hard to implement is choosing people who would use it correctly and completely. Which those who have a complete control of their emotions. One example is marines, but even them don't always have the best intentions.
It can happen in steps. Half the people who are responsible with weapons will make up the first wave. And the second wave will introduce more people, with more lenient tolerance of the emotional of the group, but still strict. The third group will have the same training as what is going on today with gun control.
Robbers, or terrorists, school shooters. Won't have the idea of trying anything, and if they do. The people won't allow it.
Plus I believe that it will have an added effect, of the government actually doing what is responsible, because the nation will now be armed.
The concept of unjustly sentencing people, bills that take advantage of others instead of benefitting all. Companies selling a product that doesn't even work. Critical race theory being taken out of schools.
People who have malicious intentions of hurting others, physically, or through our own system will decrease. It's as close to a utopia, and country or county peace as you can get.
I know one thing. That America is the only country that can make it happen.
Their only law is, "Get off of mah lawn!"
This reminds of the way death is viewed in the John Wick universe. It’s nothing personal and it can happen to anyone at any time and if you don’t respect the rules, it certainly will happen to you.
Heard a burp on 2:55 😆
Funny that I actually went back to check it but alas I didn't let something THAT embarassing into the final video
I think the book version of this show calls this chapter “The law of the Jungle.”
Also imagine the kids raised up in a place like this, What would their views on murder and killing be like? It would be nice to see a child’s view about this town.
The Wild West pretty much.
I can imagine that this be how the Minutemen would think back in Fallout 4
I always kind of thought that the people liveing there were people for one reason or another came from rough circumstances like the gladiator. Thy Came from a background were thy had no choice but to kill or hurt to survive, or maybe they had enjoyed it in the past, but came to regret their actions later in the future. A broken kind of town we’re thy have been in those situations and expenced first hand the harshness of killing but necessity of being able to protect yourself and your own peace. Thuse thy created a town where they could protect themselves and had an understanding with each other that the others would do the same and help protect them if they were put in a bad situation again.
The society is interesting to me the way they interact and live. They are fine with it. There no person trying to stroke a flame. Occasionally they just need to deal bad apples that come into town.
It would absolutely suicide for someone to make an enemy of these people.
I heard you burp when you said "head out" 2:53
....
This country is the definition of "read the fine print"
Yes . This shows us laws dont create lawlessness in any country but it is the the citizens moral principles that matters the most.
Best country ever ... With responsible gun owners
Try that in a small town. This town is literally Texas.
I've always felt that this style of law is basically just the people taking protection into their own hands. Criminals will be criminals. They'd kill regardless. So it's almost an unspoken rule of safety for the people, you just have to be willing to step up to the killing bat. Of course though everything has its pros and cons. Anyone want to chip in to make a list of such pros and cons?
does anyone know where i can watch this anime?
You can stream it legally on Funimation
if dexter morgan was a mayor
Great, it only gets messy when diversity and a shewed sense of justice comes up.
Cause in my mind if something bad happens and people can’t figure it out exactly their first thought is to prosecute the “guilty party”
Which is why the justice system exists. Their will still be a need for a justice system or a detective group
This is where I want to be during the purge
What's this anime called??
Kino no tabi or Kino's journey, read the title lol
@@FahesHorizon oh 😂 cheers bro
The reason I enjoyed this series so much is because Kino’s Journey explores sociology and philosophy so deeply, without relying on a lot of other elements. It’s a good anime to just sit back with, relax, watch, and think.
its like Walter the angel of death just isekai after his death then turn into who just have enough doing the wiring thing, probably he thought it seems that doesn't suits him anymore since he's a girl.
Well at least
These people just want to live a life. Anyone that causes chaos (specific types) die.
You know what’s scary your dealing with a group of people always analysing and judging whether you friend or foe. They don’t need to worry about each other they are more focus on you whether your a danger to the whole. To pity that you had to be killed for being dangerous and how your home society created a danger. God the children probably take pride in that. From there childhood to trust your people and equally judge new people.
Killing is legal in that country but it never said anything about robbery.
So being mean and disrespectful to individuals will result in death and the whole sequence are constantly scrutiny by each individual citizen.
Well, it is not fair for sure, but justice will preserve indeed. Justice is blind for reasons after all.
No they can have problems with each other but they only kill you if you try and kill an indecent person
everyone there's a retired killer. No one's good and everyone had done some bad and got away with it while enforcing their own perceived ideal of 'goodness' and 'scrutiny'
Instead, it seems more like a typical society where your own safety is your own responsibility and the person with the faster reflex wins or the one with a larger group wins or the one who gets away with it wins kind of deal.
Oooh so this place is Texas no wonder this was super familiar to me
It literally looks like a wild west film. Most people would assume its texas
I understand and agreed with that city.. is something wrong with me?
Basically, argument against gun control law. Perfect ...
The important bit is how the town works. The "alderman" sounds like he's been talking with other locals when he finally sits down to figure out Kino and find out what she intends.
How? The bad guy has a gun. The good guy used a sword. The bad guy is shot with an arrow
lmao Ian was one country off
I loved that country
peace aint free
The warrior concept had always been quite peculiar to me since childhood as even though killing is bad we somehow say it is terrible if done by individuals
Living in Singapore where we need to serve two years of our time as conscript we were told if something bad happen we will need to kill others . But outside of military we were told that murder is bad.
Fighting for survival doesnt necessarily means it is a good thing as well.
Well, the practicality of the job and the actual benefit of a soldier aside. Whethet murder is allowed or not really depends on culture and the state of the society they in isnt it.
The human psyche need to demonize and dehumanize others to murder another. Even killing animals is hard for some while easy for others.
Economics, social values, market demands, limitation of resources are all factors that push people to kill. And human as a whole is malleable, they get use to things even in the worse of situation...if they survive haha
Another good example will be viking society isnt it? Myth like Odin and Valhalla are kinda coping mechanism and justification for a warrior way of ljfe. Not that it is wrong. It was just how it is back then. Different time different values
It is always better to be a warrior in a garden than be a gardener in the battlefield
This episode makes it simple by writing up the easiest, most obvious villain possible. The man is not hiding his intent. He is pulling out a firearm in the middle of the street, in broad daylight. There is no need to investigate him or any need for resources to pursue him outside the town border.
The scourge of early towns and cities was pickpockets, highwaymen, burglars. We don't get to see how much of the road the town militia can police.
These guys at least take an interest in new arrivals and it seems like they keep an eye on Kino. The "alderman" she talks with sounds like he has gathered enough background from the other villagers and wants an excuse for a face-to-face meeting for last.
Tel me anime name plss?
Kino's journey
2nd Amendment in a nutshell. Safety by the people, for the people.
wait isnt kino a boy?i think i heard people calling him boy, him etc.
Only a citizen with a gun can stop a bad guy with a gun.
Statistically speaking unarmed citizens and gun control laws stop bad guys with a gun
@@DeathnoteBB I can’t tell if your being sarcastic or you are just that liberal
@@AmbroseBoaBowie I… Bro it’s just like, a fact. Also you know liberals are right-wing, right?
A polite society, is an armed society
This show did it so well with that old man.
You don't have a weapon that can kill TO kill people. You do it because the future is a scary, potentially dark place, that you might have to choose between an innocent and a monster. What person would choose the innocent to die? You MIGHT be able to prevent an innocent person's life. And that chance is more than enough reason for me. It could be my mother. Or yours. Or brother, father, son, why should they die because I refused to be able to protect them? This is why the Founding Father's gave us American's that inherited right, because they saw horrible things happen to their own people by the ones who said they shouldn't be able to defend each other. They dreamt of a country so united, all states would be as family, where people could do as they do in Kino's Journey, and never have to wait for the cops to "legally" kill someone while innocents die.
Canadian huh.
Kino in the USA
This is exactly what America should have been
Not a cult... vigilantes and a posse.
Early european cities used vigilantes under variations of hue and cry. If you see a crime, you and the local citizenry are supposed to grab the dude collectively and pull him to the alderman. If it is a capital crime it might get pushed up to government courts but you can handle small stuff yourself. The old man here looks like your typical alderman or reeve with the informal backing of his town.
The limit to the system was scale and increasingly sophisticated crime. Townies have their day job to do, they can't be out on the road patrolling for highwaymen. Investigating a crime is hard, even if the "alderman" here is doing a nice checkup on Kino.
its all well and good if all the citizens are a hive mind, but human individuality will eventually disagrees maybe not their current generation but the next or the next, and soon, if if boy from family A had a disagreement with boy in family B, and it escalated to a point where boy A kills boy B, vengence will soon come upon boy A, from boy B's family members..and if both families have friends it will be all out blood feud or blood war, where each side wants to eradicate the other, since killing is legal, and killing for protection and for pre-supposed justice is allowed, nobody will stop both families in enforcing their own justice upon the other, and again their friends will join in the war of eradication, and even if you have successfully eradicated family A, their friends that joined would have had their own vengence to take upon their own loses in the war, and the cycle continues, this is what our modern laws is trying to prevent by making killing ill legal..
The only possible solution, even though it sounds horrible, would be to vanish both families from the country, without the root of the disaster, the other citizens will have not conflict at all.
@@croxmor you cant banish them, by law they did nothing wrong, in the age of the dane law in britain, they have a thing called "wergeld", where the offending party will pay reparations to the family of the deceased, and during these time and the following generation had a form of legal killing in the form of dueling "Holmgang" this could be to the death or until one yields, but still this still does not solve all revenge killing, as not all people will honor the holmgang, yeah i came to realize that what they are showing here is not that killing should be allowed, but they are saying that there are no perfect government..
Basically, Texas done right.
an armed society is a polite society
What a lovely country. 😅
Unfortunately in a reality where everyone has gun, only bad guy get to shoot first...
As for the good guy who only use gun for self defense?
...
Nevermind, Lets jump to the next 5-6 good guy...
Is kino a girl or boy
Girl, but she using word boku ("Me" in japan using by boy or gender neutral people).
You can use she or them to refer Kino
Girl
Kino is female.
^
Dub :0
An armed society is a polite society
Isn’t that related to President Duterte?
Hindi
2nd Amendment Country
This anime is a perfect example to why US government politicians should not take away the rights of every US citizen to posses a fire-arm
It's also complete fantasy, as in reality the exact opposite happens when you have a lot of guns around.
Havent learn from recent Atlanta shooting hm ?
I think the best crime-preventative measure in here is the "alderman" taking personal time to ask Kino what she's up to. It sounds like he's been talking with the other townies, and wants to finish with a face-to-face talk.
It only works for a small town, not for a very large nation
Bruh it’s a fictional show
All I could think of was
Ew, english dub
It's not bad
I'm grateful for dubs. I hate reading subs and couldn't care less how Japanese sounds.
This scene is horribly contrived, there are numerous opportunity for ian to save or defend himself and kill at least a few of his murders before he died. But instead they make him incompetent, why would he not immediately run after the arrow shot his arm, who wouldn't immediately grab the gun with your other hand and take cover to return fire. This scene is too stupid to exist naturally, it's far to conceivable that ian would go on a killing spree in the town given the proliferation of weapons, especially with some being near silent, that would have been a far better end for this town
Kino use they/them not in the dub apparently and its poorly communicated even in the sub. though not the point of the video which was well done.
Fun Fact:if you have the money and pappers you can create a country with ANY laws :D 100% ilegal alowed
Also there is a area in the world where murder is legaly alowed because there is to much crime
Interesting. But it would've been better with a protagonist that is not a fkn 10 yo
Doesn't their law mean that whenever somebody is too poor to afford a necessary commodity (food, clothing e.g.) and they aren't given it for free by a shop owner for example, that they have the right to kill that person because that is technically murder?!?
With "laws" like that you can defend literally any killing. It is "Freedom" as an excuse for personal failings.
Nobody is given the right to kill anyone, skill and power decides that, not rights. The question isn't whether or not you are allowed to kill, but whether or not you *can* kill. If the shopkeeper is a better shot than you, it's over for you.
@@Gurgleschlortz So what you're saying is that it's okay if the "weak" perish and the "strong" survive?
Everyone's a retired killer in that anime. No one's good and everyone' a witch except their own perceived ideal of 'goodness'.
Instead, it seems more like a typical society where your own safety is your own responsibility and it's your own fault if you can't take care of yourself.
While the person with the faster reflex wins or the one with a larger group wins or the one who gets away with it wins kind of deal.
@@ZackTanTYZ M8 in typical society your own safety isn't even wholly your own responsibility. The simple fact that things in a society that have a strong effect on individuals are far away from the control of individuals (e.g. Deflation which in turn can have effects on the decision making of employers to not employ or fire their employees which in turn means that these now jobless people can't afford food anymore) is enough to disprove this.
Argumentation like yours are just horrid justifications of social darwinism
@@yaboimaboi2816
Bruh, I'm not justifying about this but explaining how much of a wild west or dark ages kind of mentality they have.
I don't really care how much you dislike it or how horrid it is, it is how it is. It had happened before and I'm pretty sure this mentality has happened in some places now and I'm sure it's the only mentality they have to rely on when there's no one else to count on but yourself, not even your boss.
wtf is wrong with the comment section. Can you Americans stop talking about your politics? No one cares.