Could the EU military conquer the UK? REACTION!! | OFFICE BLOKES REACT!!
Vložit
- čas přidán 8. 09. 2024
- Comment Below with More Reaction Ideas!
Show some support and sign up to our Patreon for exclusive videos not on CZcams, Access to our Banned Videos and to guarantee we react to your request
/ officeblokesreact
Link to original video: • Could the EU military ...
Recorded at Atlantic Podcast Studios: info@atlanticpodcaststudios.com
/ office_blokes_react
/ officeblokespodcast
For all enquiries email: officeblokesreact@gmail.com
Copyright Disclaimer Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, allowance is made for "fair use" for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing. Non-profit, educational or personal use tips the balance in favor of fair use. No copyright infringement intended. ALL RIGHTS BELONG TO THEIR RESPECTIVE OWNERS
"We'd never invade you guys either!"😂 all love from across the pond haha
There’s NO WAY the U.S. would stand by and watch the U.K. be attacked by anyone - wouldn’t happen in a million years.
Yeah, I'd like to think that would be true regarding any Western European nation or Japan, and possibly South Korea. Not Canada though, they need to start learning the hard way that it'll take more than syrup and hockey to survive. (jk)
@@ahoyforsenchou7288 I don't know. You can do a lot of damage with syrup and a hockey stick.
@@williamjordan5554 as someone who was once knocked out and concussed by a hockey stick I can confirm this. Those things are fucking lethal 😂
It never will happen we’re always there for them no matter what
Unless the UK starts, then they would ally with the EU first and foremost. Thankfully no armed conflict will likely ever occur between the 2.
I get the jokes about France. We say the same thing about them in the U.S. And it's not like there haven't been a few instances where they have given up rather easily. But France actually has an *excellent* military. One of the best in the world. And they always have an abundance of combat-seasoned veterans (unlike the U.K.) due to their continual involvement in anti-terrorism operations in North Africa. They're actually pretty tough.
@Patrick Wieland This is a actually an excellent point. The U.K. relies heavily on Germany (Heckler and Koch, Ruger), the U.S. (Colt especially), and Turkey (Tisas, etc.) for its armaments.
Not to mention much of its artillery (and other heavy equipment, with the exception of light fighter aircraft) being manufactured by the U.S.
It’s a running joke that started because France got wrecked by the 3rd Reich during WW2 but this joke currently has no basis in reality. Nowadays, the French arguably have the most powerful military in all of Western Europe.
There have been only a few instances of France surrendering easily. France has won more wars than any other nation(1.115).
They are just very Nationalistic which is smart. They don’t want to fight except for their own country benefit. Yes they have that mercenary army as well which is unique, they take anyone from Europe, many criminals join
3 million guns in the UK here in Colorado that is like one gun show. I work with a guy who buys at least 3 guns every week. He gets approval right away he purchases them so much.
I think type of gun makes a big impact too... a 9mm vs a bolt action rifle shooting .30-06 or an AR15 is going to be a big difference. I'd be curious to see how many pistols vs rifles vs shotguns in the UK.
Meanwhile, Russia notices all the EU's forces in the west, and they roll into Poland and Germany. Oops.
no Poland and Hungary not a big loss :)
@@didierlemoine6771 And then Poland has to go through another foreign occupation for 100 years. Seems like you like the EU.
@@American-Orthodox-Christian im european and i like Europ with no borders for people :)
@@didierlemoine6771 you also seem to forget why poland is nationalistic in the 1st place.
@@American-Orthodox-Christian Poland does not care of EU like Hungary
The British Navy is way better than most EU countries. Therefore no beach landings. There are 11 major ports in Scotland for mass unloading of troops and supplies. The British Navy and Air Force could easily turn these ports useless in less than a day. Scotland has 11 major airports too. Even IF transport planes got through the RAF, these airports would been rendered also useless by British bombers. More so, the EU doesn't put much into vessels to invade beach heads because they're land locked with potential enemies.
Canada, USA, UK, Australia, and New Zealand are like family. Ireland's like a weird uncle that shows up for Thanksgiving Dinner once every few years.
I know part of the rules of video was no ally help but realistically the United States would not just watch one of their closest allies get attacked by an entire continent and not intervene.
3 million guns in the UK? There are over 300 million guns in the US. The Second Amendment was placed in the US constitution for this very purpose of defense.
The purpose is overtake by the fact the biggest ennemy of US armed citizen are US armed citize.
@@tm.8399 The price we pay to stay unconquerable even by our own government theoretically.
@@williamjordan5554 Your gun would be useless against your gov, unless your ar 15 can damage a tank, helicopter etc...which it doesnt, that was effective 200 years ago when it was musquet again musquet, and even saw, the regular army won (civil war), because of the the training, the cohesion and experience of their leaders. No country in the world is unconquerable on its own. And your private gun would be absolutely useless against a regular army.
The price you pay is killing more people than a real war for your own country, only thing topping that would be the covid.
@@tm.8399 300,000,000 guns could cause a lot of trouble for an occupying force of whatever origin. Think Vietnam multiplied by thousands. And don't think some national guard forces with their armories and ex-military won't flip sides. You don't know Americans.
@@williamjordan5554 Vietnam is a jungle where tank and armored car can't progress. Vietnam were heavily armed and reinforced by China. Much more that any civilian in the US can use now, from lmg to tanks and heavy artillery.
You are in a world full of hypothetical coup d'état by the army, some national guard may or may not accept it, whily you are imaging a world full of biaised view, you are killing each other.
What the scenario doesn't take into account is that unlike with the US, the UK could land some blows on EU soil.
@Prof81Wil you did not understand their comment.
The US can touch EU territory easily.
@@williamjordan5554 the US will be with EU, always economical interest first
@dobatag no America will see its interest first :)) and England is small and poor :)
The point is - with US v UK scenario, the UK can’t really attack US mainland, but with UK v EU then UK can attack continental EU
The nuclear triad is not a defense system it is the 3 way they can be used, bombers, subs, and ICBMs
Too many friends across the pond here whom are raised in a gun culture that would come to the aid of our UK brethren, without being asked ;) fuck.... you'd be fine if we just sent Texas lol
I don’t give a fuck we would come and help no matter what!!!! We love 🇬🇧 much love from Oklahoma!!!!!
I’d like to think so, but that is not certain. The current US President was part of an administration that didn’t support Brexit, Mr. Obama even came to England to support the Remain vote before the Brexit vote.
@@anthonyhantonh brexit was an idiotic idea thought up by the equivalent of Trumptards in the UK. We suffered through Trump, they gotta suffer through Brexit.
@@Vendrix86 so you agree. Biden, in this hypothetical scenario, is more likely to side with the EU. That’s what I was saying.
@@anthonyhantonh I mean the whole point of this unlikely scenario was no allies/nukes so not really.
No offense but both the EU and UK are allies, from a pragmatic point of view the EU is the better choice.
It's cute that 3 million guns = a lot.
Love, USA. :-)
There were 19 million guns sold in just the first 6 months of 2020.
@@krayzy932 a lot by first time owners to
It’s cute how excited you are about how many guns Americans have you must really be in love with your guns
@@johnwhite345 it’s cute how smug you are about the comments, you must really love yourself more than anyone else does.
No, the US would support the UK in anyway nessasary. Secrect money, secret supplies... hell, secret people if needed.
But this is a no support battle
@@someonerandom7351 The US wouldn't allow the UK to go it alone. They just wouldn't.
@@jaydisqus3353 oh trust me I know we won’t we always have each other’s backs, hell I’ll go over there and help B)
@@someonerandom7351 Even a peacenik like me would support arming up and heading over. These videos are really honest about what would happen.
@@jaydisqus3353 but thankfully that would never happen, I hope
The last bit about the British people assume that those densely populated areas survive bombings and tanks and such.
I like to think of the US, UK and Canada as brothers. UK is the older mature brother. We the US are the middle child who's got their shit together for the most part. Canada is the younger child, who Mom and Dad were worn out by time they came along and let them get away with more. We may bicker amongst each other,but when shit gets real. We've got each others backs. Then there is Australia, they're like the half brother from Mom and her new husband. We love him but he's a little on the strange side. We're all one big happy dysfunctional family.
The U.S.A. and the UK are best friends, so bring it on EU.
while meanwhile the one who"s really winning are the covid-19 not even the military can stand a chance against that one
Haha. "Best friends." I think you have to consider a whole lot of other very important factors that will show you that in this scenario the UK would not really be the USA's best friend.
And at the last minute, the UK fires off all its nukes.
this is why US are such big allies us
bigger allies to EU than britain for sure !
The UK doesn't provide a lot strategically for the US, but the EU countries do.
@@MaSsiVeGaming1 eu countries also don’t meet the money Target for Nato. Security uk usa are the only countries to do it
Fair vlogs Uk UK cheats about its NATO military spending. UK spends less than 2% nato requirements. only USA, France, Poland, Estonia, and Greece spends the 2% nato target.
so u need to post a real stats instead of ur Brit propaganda stuff.
Lol Dave's dad's army would get their asses kicked in about 5 days against a real properly trained military
Don't worry, UK friends. The US will come to your aid.
Sure but can you first protect your capital before you make any commitments.
@@kenich2611 those dweebs were let in lmao
No, it wouldn't. It's pure logic.
You assume that the U.S. would be on the U.K. side, but they would be as neutral as possible, only giving financial aid and trying to find a solution, because the U.S. wants to keep both parties as allies.
I don't think so, they will stay out of it for a long time and if only support Finaziall.
Because the EU is a much more important trading partner, strategically more important it would be more difficult and worse to implement because it is strategically ineffective.
And it would only bring disadvantages to most countries, especially the US.
They would lose a lot of control over the world, they would lose markets and it would be extremely costly.
The countries would take a lot of money and losses, although the countries with both parties work closely together and have many common projects.
And the other important nations would also interfere, which could be the end of the US hegemony, which they would not risk.
@@Janoip Exactly. That's what I said in another comment.
It wont happen because the EU would buckle and collapse under its own beaurocracy to unite for a concentrated effort
Nah, Germany would essentially put themselves in charge of any major war, and the rest of the EU would agree because they know Germany could get it done (plus, they have the largest military).
@@Leon-bp6kb Yes, it was tongue-in-cheek.
sigh....it's a hypothetical war assuming EU is fully united against the UK....something you and the bloke with the hat doesn't understand for some reason.
And hypothetically russia will definitely invade to regain those fallen communist countries.
@@dmarklatham Yeah, given that in regards to strength and unity Germany is the weakest it's probably ever been. I mean, just imagine following Angela Merkel into war. Big yikes!
Lol Dave is way too patriotic for these types of videos he said the same thing after the video "could the us invade the uk" the answer to both question is yes the US could conquer the uk and so could the eu. It's just a numbers game. It's not personal.
100 million Americans own over 300 million guns. Give them free flights to the UK and provide them room and board.
And much as we bicker, England and her sons will always stand together. It would would take the entire world to try and beat the UK, Canada, Australia, and The U.S.A.
@dobatag tip top
ANGLOSPHERE UNITE
llies.
I don't think so, they will stay out of it for a long time and if only support Finaziall.
Because the EU is a much more important trading partner, strategically more important it would be more difficult and worse to implement because it is strategically ineffective.
And it would only bring disadvantages to most countries, especially the US.
They would lose a lot of control over the world, they would lose markets and it would be extremely costly.
The countries would take a lot of money and losses, although the countries with both parties work closely together and have many common projects.
And the other important nations would also interfere, which could be the end of the US hegemony, which they would not risk.
Binkov's stuff is great do more! He made an EU vs USA video that's good!
That guy forgot we keep 2 B-2s over there and they could decimate at least 2 based a night
You should try the US vs EU video and the US vs UK video by the same guy. Or actually anything by this guy, Binkov is really good.
They have reacted to him before. Particularly the US vs UK one.
In the US there’s more guns than people, so that would be interesting to see someone try to invade.. lol
Not to mention the oceans on either side. Any invading force would have to deal with the same issues that the U.S. did in the "Could the U.S. take the U.K." video, but they'd have a much weaker military to try to accomplish it with.
China is the only one that might come close, but they really only have troop numbers, not greater aircraft, ship, and armament numbers than the U.S.
U.S. carriers are also more advanced and greater in number, so an invasion from the West would have to dodge all of our bases in Korea, Japan, Hawaii, the Philippines, etc., as well as the West coast. And if they do manage to land their troops onto U.S. soil (because 100% nobody is winning a naval or air war in U.S. territory) then they'd be greeted with hundreds of millions of guns.
A ridiculous scenario completely cut off from reality. I expect to see this guy’s next video “Could 1” tall Games Workshop Space Marine models conquer the UK?”
Yes, I believe that's exactly what the narrator means when he says "we're talking about a fantasy world" lol
I know the rules of the scenario say no allies. But I'm curious what the US would do if the EU invaded the UK unprovoked. Like say attacked to forcibly keep them in the EU? Cuz the US and UK special relationship. I can't see a scenario the US doesn't come to the UKs defense?
@Patrick Wieland I'm not sure exactly what you are trying to say? If you meant what would the EU do if the US attacked the UK unprovoked? Attacked should go before unprovoked. Or say attacked without provocation. This is all hypothetical. Then the little dig about the US and oil? You sound like Fred Armisen in a low budget Rob Schneider movie. You mad? Why the hate?
@Patrick Wieland I feel I may have stuck my foot in my mouth. I misinterpreted your comment. My mistake and my apologies.
If a minor country did it the USA would support the UK. If the EU did it the USA would support the EU.
@@MaSsiVeGaming1 I have to respectfully disagree. I do not see a scenario where the US does not support the UK or vice-versa. Our fates are tied together.
@@Blue_Eyed_Chippewa Of course, it's just a hypothetical scenario and we have the tendency to apply our own biases to it. Not to mention a scenario with any million possible outcomes. However, I think if we apply sense and reasoning to the scenario, in realistic terms with world consequences, then are two slightly more plausible scenarios to consider. 1.) Neutrality. The USA becomes a passive observer to the conflict, whilst perhaps (and plausibly) supplying the UK war effort indirectly, but at the same time avoiding tensions with the EU to minimise the risk of direct conflict and ensure its economic, trade and strategic military ties remain intact to protect its global interests. 2.) The USA sides with the EU politically to ensure a peaceful resolve to the conflict and protect its global interests.
these vids never take into account things that we could easily do for example use nukes as boobytraps at key points since you only need the explosion/fallout to make land pretty much impassable
This scenario assumes the Republic of Ireland would cooperate with the EU. They may value their relationship with Canada, Aussie, and USA more than following suit with the EU.
The US sees our British brothers in trouble and says “ hold my beer”
Why make someone hold your beer you finish that shit then take care of business
@@wickedkotton5998
Even better. Long as there’s a fresh coldy waiting after.
I'm just curious what the Irish folks think about having UK or EU Coalition troops in their country.
I don't think they'd be too happy about British troops returning to their lands. Looking at the history I reckon they'd prefer the EU troops 😆
If this scenario did happen, and Republic of Ireland didn’t sign a peace pack with us than we have no further to choice to send troops into Northern Ireland, I love my fellow Irish cousins but I know the history will not agree with us in circumstance.
It should include the common wealth i.e. Australia canada india ect, basically matching the EU
Any chance on that 'Bad Wolves - Zombies' react? :')
Like most thought experiments, this battle is outside the realm of realistic possibilities. The British _do_ have nukes, and they _do_ have America on speed-dial. This kind of battle is like trying to decide who would win a battle between Thanos and Superman. Might be interesting to think about, but it's never going to happen in reality. Besides, Thanos would win.
@Patrick Wieland Naw, you can't have a dictatorship while you have a queen. And their queen seems immune to both retirement & death, so she's not going anywhere. Besides, death is not the impediment it once was. Keith Richards has been dead for 15 years or so, yet he still shows up at Stones' concerts.
There is one slightly more probable outcome in this scenario... The USA would INEVITABLY join the EU to "friendly tackle the UK" in order to protect their global hegemony and secure ties with their allies.
@@MaSsiVeGaming1 and how would that make sense, Two great powers like USA and EU going against a small nation of 65 million people.
Firstly, It will take only a day for the EU to completely roll over the entirety of UK because of size and power between the two sides.
secondly it makes sense to compare a war between the great powers like EUvs USA or China vs Russia.
Thirdly, it’s laughable to compare the UK military power to that of the European Union.
How does China is weaponizing the belt and the road initiative that should be watched following the last China video I mentioned
They also didn’t take into consideration how much of the EU military hardware is controlled by the US, that would be shut off with a switch. That wouldn’t count as an “ally” situation, just that the EU “completely independent military equipment” numbers are vastly over inflated.
And the US military bases all over the EU make up a large amount of their defense.....also would those bases also be overtaken first by the EU or are they counting them as EU defense numbers? By my reckoning they are doing the latter so it’s incorrect.
You assume that the U.S. would be on the U.K. side, but they would be as neutral as possible, only giving financial aid and trying to find a solution, because the U.S. wants to keep both parties as allies.
I don't think so, they will stay out of it for a long time and if only support Finaziall.
Because the EU is a much more important trading partner, strategically more important it would be more difficult and worse to implement because it is strategically ineffective.
And it would only bring disadvantages to most countries, especially the US.
They would lose a lot of control over the world, they would lose markets and it would be extremely costly.
The countries would take a lot of money and losses, although the countries with both parties work closely together and have many common projects.
And the other important nations would also interfere, which could be the end of the US hegemony, which they would not risk.
Brits depend on America to protect them so we will be getting a phone call telling us they need help
Honestly would've never guessed there were 3,000,000 privately owned firearms in the UK. I've only heard complaints about how hard it is to own guns over there. Hell, I've recently been looking into getting an air gun (pellet gun) and found out that you guys can't even own pellet guns with over 12 ft/lbs of power without some special license! That's hardly enough force to kill a squirrel! We give those to children here lol. That said, you have a pretty robust air gun community over there. But, I've been cringing hearing stories of people with beautiful $2,000 air rifles talking about how they had to nerf them to 12ft/lbs when in the states the same gun comes stock with over 60ft/lbs. It's like paying for a finely crafted expensive BB gun lol.
Croatia itself defeated England in 125 minutes *drops mic* :D
lol..
nah mate 5 of our RM lads could wreak havoc agaisnt a hundred strong of any force.
No i dont´t think the US would risk getting involved to help the UK, they would lose way more than they would gain from that.
Btw this scenario is ridiculous, the UK could have the best military in the world and it would do no difference, strength in numbers people.
how does UK has the best military in the world? what are u smoking my friend?
@@siadwarsame2045 You should probably read that again cause that's not what I wrote.
How would US bases in the UK react to an attack on the UK? The US would open a can of whoop-ass. EU beware.
The US also has many more bases in the EU I personally would disagree with any war with the EU/UK and would likely side with the defender in a war.
Individual countries we'd beat only France would be a real threat combined we'd get hammered quite obviously
Get get em Daz
never, ever happen...Uncle Sam wouldnt have it it Blokes! Our friends? I'm already enlisting....
No we would send you help
Yes but unlike America your citizens do not have firearms. And we have high end weaponry with our citizens
We do have firearms. They're just not as prevalent. The firearms we do have though are hardly outdated. We still have some hefty firepower 😆
Daz would at least have a pass cuz of his American kids.
Call US and let us know what you need I think you got this
I was curious how many guns Americans owned, when you started talking about there being 3 million guns in the hands of civilians in the UK. I looked it up. There are 393 million guns in the hands of 72 million Americans. No point, I was just curious.
On a side note, no way we'd let you fight the EU without us.
I want to just see, UK and Germany. You know, for old times sake.
I would have to say as an outsider here while strategically invading Ireland makes sense in this do you as brits think that would end well? Lol
No 😂 no it wouldn't. We only just patched things up with Ireland, if we sent troops back there I'm sure they'd join the EU Coalition
The EU almost fell apart withBrexit
All this is hypothetical, I understand, but just to note. Given UK helped us Estonians during our war for independence and is based here right now to ensure our independence, it is very unlikely Estonia, even though EU member, would not ally with UK in this scenario. We are small nation, but I it is important to note that EU is not that homogeneous. But fun comparison still, just to give perspectives.
:54 Simply no, the UK would have the backing of the US. Hence WW2 part deux!
I think the US has more stock in the UK as an ally than the EU. Then again that depends on who is in power. The left tends to lean EU and the right UK. Either way, You have my full support. We may be a different country but many Americans are of Irish, English, Scottish, and welsh ancestry and would most likely back their heritage.
Not at all. The U.S. needs the E.U. *way* more than the U.K. due to it being the gateway for every major combat theatre in the eastern hemisphere, and to serve as a buffer against the Russian Federation. Not only that, but a ton of our military resources are located in Germany (and to a lesser degree, France). It makes the U.K.'s strategic value and potential contribution to American hegemony look rather small in comparison.
@@willsofer3679 Buffer from the Russian Federation? how so, the Russian Federation is a risk to the EU, not the US. Worst case, the Russians take over and we're buying wine from a guy named Igor instead of a guy named Marcel. The Atlantic Ocean is our buffer from the Russian Federation. The only reason to fight in Europe at all is to defend Europe. Your argument boils down to "Europe is more important because we need access to Europe to defend Europe". It's a tautology, not an argument.
@@NVKyleBrown I'd be inclined to agree with you, but that's not actually what I meant. The U.S. military divides the world into regional theatres, and the Middle Eastern/Central Asian (arguably the most important), the African, and parts of the Indo-China theatre are accessed through Europe. It's a matter of logistics, and the strategic value of where Europe is in relation to the rest of the world. It's why we allot so much of our overseas resources to places like Ramstein. It's not actually about Europe itself.
It serves as a buffer because that's where Russia has most of its expansionistic goals. It's a first front, but mainly in the case of the U.S. securing resources elsewhere, and the interest in securing Europe in order to do so. Europe is also a major regional military power, so helping them helps us with both projection and aid in conflicts.
@@NVKyleBrown Given how hostile the US reacted to our nation trading with Russia it appears that Russia is more of a threat to the US Empire than to Europe. Without Europe the US empire returns to a pre-WW2 state, while the Russians take over (not that I think they could, but let's assume for a second) and become a superpower once more. Russia-Europe and China vs. the US doesn't seem favourable. The US very much benefits from denying Europe to a third Superpower - that's Geopolitics 101.
Where did you find this video? UK has three aircraft carriers for a start, what a load of garbage!
First of all we have two carriers not three and when the original video was made the second one wasn’t in service
It's interesting to contemplate about but also a totally silly and unrealistic scenario. This would never happen. The UK has long standing allies in the EU and the EU is very important ally for the UK.
It is fun to speculate and add rules into the scenario, but again.. Real life it would be really hard because US and Canada would 100% intervene. If you look at the world war and Ops in the middle east and around the world, you always have US, UK, Canada, and even Australian always doing joint-ops. Yes US does Joint-ops with others as well, but US and UK do Joint-ops all the time lol, they are literally like cousin countries when its all said and done in the world view.
We Dutch will never invade you England, the Land of Beautiful Soccer, the land of Good Humor and Jokes, the Land of Sir Tom Jones and Very Good Music, We will fight with you and don't forget the Scandinavian Country's, they will protect England as well.
🇳🇱🤝🇬🇧❤️
lel
Britain only invades the Dutch for pancakes with stroop and a quiet smoke😉🥞
Now, wouldn’t Commonwealth nations quickly transport as many forces they could to England?! I don’t really know what responsibilities the Commonwealth nations have towards England.
That said, I’d like to see America/United Kingdom vs the European Union.
@@Diomedene That war game allowed the US to attack other countries to cut off supply to the major military powers while this one would not. Not to mention the US vs EU would most likely be asking if the US could invade the EU which means it’s on the offense trying to occupy countries rather then defend against them.
@@notanoob8163 The scenario is everything. Taking over another country, vs defending yourself from that country invading are two very seperate propositions. But, taking over a country with the US helping to defend that country is tipping toward "invading the US" in terms of difficulty. With serious US support, there would be very few countries that could not mount a successful defense against any other hostile.
The commonwealth, I don't believe have any military obligations to the UK, however I can't see them backing the EU Coalition in any way.
@@Diomedene A highly unrealistic outcome only a dummy could come up with...
bro wth are these comments "Very nice 😍💋 💝💖♥️❤️" "I'm single 😥😥😥😥😥" is this channel getting bombarded by bots or something??? lol, anyways great video
Yeh bots
if you are a boy yes bots if it is a girl boys xD
They can try... ⚔️
The only reason eu is sad about UK leaving the EU with have Nukes and EU wants them.
France has nukes. Germany has voluntarily none and could produce them within 2 month. Same with spain. We are talking about western industrialized countries here.
France has more nukes than uk snowflake! and EU doesn’t care about little Britannia lol.
US will have UK's back
The UK has better and more trainingmore focus
A war like this would never take place in Binkov's perfect scenario. Pure fantasy.
For god's sake it's unrealistic because that's the point, it's supposed to be a fun hypothetical scenario to think about, not an actual milliary evaluation.
They literally say in the beginning 'it's a fantasy war.'
Hahaha luv it Daz nope never i agree
The EU wins this but the premise itself is ridiculous
And here come the Yanks.
No coz we just did in an election 😈
Trident not triad.
Office Blokes..."The US would never invade the United Kingdom"
(Oil is discovered in Ireland)
USA... "We're going on a gas and Guinness run...Dublin, here we come!"
Office Blokes... "um"
😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
I'm pretty sure the us at this point sits on the largest oil reserve followed by Russia then Saudi arabia
@@wickedkotton5998 Yeah...that is part of the joke...but you have obviously never seen the US&Oil memes 💯✌
Is this why Harry left for America?
The US and commonwealth countries would support the UK over the EU.
I don't think so, they will stay out of it for a long time and if only support Finaziall.
Because the EU is a much more important trading partner, strategically more important it would be more difficult and worse to implement because it is strategically ineffective.
And it would only bring disadvantages to most countries, especially the US.
They would lose a lot of control over the world, they would lose markets and it would be extremely costly.
The countries would take a lot of money and losses, although the countries with both parties work closely together and have many common projects.
And the other important nations would also interfere, which could be the end of the US hegemony, which they would not risk.
France would surrender then Germany would turn on the rest
What a joke. I'd bet on Britain. When has the EU ever been able to pool its resources like what the video proposes? There's a reason the US has to constantly do the heavy lifting for Europe militarily (even in the wars against Serbia). Germany and France would endlessly bicker about who gets to take the lead. They likely don't have enough fuel to operate 1400 aircraft and so many ships, so their efforts would be bottlenecked. I suspect a lot of that aircraft and naval ships are obsolete and left over from the Cold War. The quality and training of EU troops varies wildly so it's not a 1 to 1 proposition.
The UK should join the US as a single member state or 4 different states (England, Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland)
these battles would never take place,( I hope), but this series is very informative about military powers. the puppet is awesome. I would like you guys to react to the knuckle head assholes who attacked the US Capital building. I would like to hear your feeling on the tragedy. i get it if would rather pass because you don't want to get f-ed with.
This Russian dude need to learn how to use a comma because it's super annoying when he's trying to display statistics.
REACTION ZERO GRAND BEATBOX BATTLE CHAMPION 2020 COMPILATION
I'm single 😥😥😥😥😥
Very nice 😍💋 💝💖♥️❤️