I never said, that both crashed... I said that one crashed. I didn't knew, that the second wasn't completed.... Thought that I have read, that it was also flying... But could be wrong...
Dominik MJ there is only one built as a "flying laboratory" to test new technologies. the second hasn't been ever completed, because one is enough for the tests.
Imagine if instead of Yeltsin, Russia had got putin immediately after ussr. They wouldn't have been broke by 1999. Imagine the completed jets they could have had, mig 1.44, this beauty
The advantage of the inverted arow wing is that the plane can perform better acrobatics at high angle of attacks with little loss of portance. Also, on a normal wing, the airflow tends to separate (detach) at the tip of the wing, wich makes turbulences around the entire wing; but on an inverted arrow wing, the airflow tends to separate and go on the jonction of the wing with the fuselage, and this gives the plane a better aerodinamic and less turbulences arround the wings.
I just love this airframe. One thing you can say: The Russians [even though it was more or less inspired by the X-29] pulled off, to make a much more impressive prototype. But yeah - only a couple of planes were built and just as technology demonstrator. Nothing more. I also don't really understand the hate here! Russian planes are rugged, good performing, they have their strengths as they have their weaknesses. American planes [and the few European airframes] are more delicate, more technological advanced. The raw power of Sukhois are definitely remarkable. On the other hand, it very much seems, that except of the performance peaks, American aircrafts are much more consistent - better overall performance below the peaks. And then it comes to the differences of believes and military doctrine: The American doctrine is focussed on the beyond the view tactics - with the dogfight as last resort. But if a dogfight occurs, the technology is assisting the pilot in any way, to let him focus on the action. The Russian doctrine is still more focussed on close combat [dogfights] - the planes are very good in the hands of a truly excellent pilot in a good condition - but a fight is not as easy to win, if the pilot is average and has to get his way through the overall flight functions. And then is the last point: both sides [Russia and the US] considered the wing forward sweep as too troublesome, to use it in real warfighters. The End!
***** Sounds again like propaganda! and myths! Well- not completely, as jamming is a common strategy, especially when the muster has to compete against e.g. a 5th gen fighter, which they might not "see". Jamming is actually a good strategy to increase the survivability - but you also derange yourself and your "comrades". Against an air superiority like the NATO [not only due to advanced combat planes but also due to AWACS, satellite link, etc] this might be their only possibility just to stand a chance...
***** Sorry, you seem like a nice guy, but I don't consider your reply as anything but wish thinking. No fighter is "un-jam'able" - and you need much more as the usual ECM jammer in a "normal" fighter jet, have a reasonable advantage [except of the fact, that the opponent combatant, can't lock on you]! These are usually the "electronic warfare airframes". I am not really sure, but I guess, this strategy might be also very vulnerable - as I guess an ARM missile, targeting the electronic emissions can make a very short [and catastrophic] end out of the situation! And Russia is pushing the development of the Sukhoi T-50 [system designation Pak-Fa] - very well - it is the first completely new developed fighter plane since decades and it is very much quite sophisticated [for Russian proportions]!
***** I think your idea about jamming is somewhat wrong! And every modern jet - if Russian, Chinese, European or American rely heavily on electronics and computers - and especially on high tech sensors, which are based on electro-magnetics and other highly "jammable" technologies! And - you shouldn't guess. The Russians are planning to deploy 60 T-50's and are on the route to develop an export version as well with the Indians. The Indians are anyway very helpful in fundiing latest military tech, to get their hands on it, for a much lower price than in the West [and they would not get the latest tech, as their security situation - e.g. when India looked for a new generation jet fighter [in the size of a F-35] the US didn't offered the Lightning II, but the latest versions of the Super Hornet and F-16 [Block 50]. The risk of unwanted technology transfer [to Russia] is just far too high in India.
***** agree with you on this, Russians are way less offensive. Lesser aircraft carriers and aircrafts but they can beat the shit out of any any country if they think of attacking Russia. Love their aircrafts though. Especially this one,Pak FA and Su 34.
Ognjen Davidovic I think, your comment shows, that you are delusional! Russian jets looked always better on the paper, as they really were. Theoretic performance was wow, while the real performance is meh. Just look at the documents, what you can find about the F-16 compared to the Mig-29. Real tests! In an air confrontation, the Mig-29 likely fall out of the sky, because "its superb engines" are so wasteful, that it runs out of kerosene before the enemy fighter can shoot it down, lol. But you have to take Russian airplanes, for what they are: robust, rather simple and cheap [compared to Western musters].
My No.1 favorite aircraft would have to go to this Su-47 Berkut. The F-4E & F-14 variants may have been endearing, the F-22A may be a pilot's dream come true... but for me, this is way more dramatic in every way. Yeah, yeah, X-29 & Tsybin LL-3 and all. This is the fighter that perfected the forward-sweep wings. I seriously wish this beautiful beauty made it to production. Here's to hopin'!
Он просто изумительный! Помню в далеком 2006-ом мы с одноклассниками играли в Generals Zero Hour, так там такие были, и мы просто восхищались его внешнему виду! Потрясающий самолет!
This plane uses (very) similar design principles to those of the Grumman X 29 research plane. To have predictable flight characteristics it must have computer sensing and control adjustments and the wings must be at once lightweight and rigid enough to resist tip flexing that would otherwise increase to the point of wing failure and/or uncontrolled pitch-up movements.
Аваков, Вениамин Богданович - конструктор, главный конструктор ОАО СКБК. Саркисов, Александр Александрович - генеральный конструктор, президент корпорации «Климов». Под его руководством и при непосредственном участии были созданы авиационные двигатели для самолётов, вертолётов и другой техники (Су-15, Су-25, МиГ-29, Ил-114, Ан-140, Як-130, Ми-8ТГ, Ка-32А, Ка-50, Т-80У). Агаджанов, Павел Артемьевич - один из основоположников советской космонавтики.
Most impressive. Fast, agile, well armed and technologically advance, worthy advisory to the F22 but in the end, it's not just the plane, it's mostly the pilot.
Man this is a really cool aircraft I love seeing it fly, its so damn strange. I wonder how many bees and/or wasps it could shoot out of the sky before having to rearm.
yeah, it's pretty good and combat tested, too. At least until Russian 5th gen fighters kick in :) Unfortunately, we lag behind in terms of advanced avionics in Russia (something like Thales Group). I still don't understand why France dropped plans for its own 5th gen fighter and chose the ridiculous over-priced JSAF program run by USA. France has everything it needs for domestic production.
I love the SU-47.... it may be a tad impractical but they just look bad ass :) my favorite jet of all time is the "Raptor" but i do have to say this jet gets mad props just for how intimidating it could be :)
они отработали то, что считалось мечтой, обратную стреловидность крыла и перешли к летающему крылу в т-50, отрабатывали в кб камова мечту о том чтоб убрать задний стабилизирующий винт на вертолете, использование граунд эфекта, как итог экраноплан и т.д. мы нация мечтателей и теперь отрабатываем на земле мечту сталина о телетанке в проекте армата, ведь основной проект только недавно раскрыли публике, армата это робот без экипажа, в крайнем случае(если бюджета не будет) это просто радиоуправляемый танк с большим радиусом действия(на данный момент до 125км от оператора), у нас много разных задумок и идей, только вот бюджет не резиновый
Я родился,когда страна назывался СССР,выучил язык,когда служил в советской армии.Неделю назад,через Грузии на автомашине вернулись из россии в Армению мои знакомые !Они интересный рассказ мне рассказали!Когда на дороге потерялись и хотели спросит правильный путь,из молодых людей ни кто слово на русском не понимал,им повезло,что встретили старых грузинов,которые объяснили!Я тоже хочу,что русский язык в Армении запретили,закрыли все школы,где учат русский язык,нам это не надо и ни к чему
Those basterds Donald trump thinks the f 35 is literally invisible fer fuk sake people made memes of him like and in general he's a fat fukin basterd just compare him to Vladimir putin😐
Современный воздушный бой происходит на расстоянии десятков километров друг от друга это борьба компьютеров и средств обнаружения . Пилотаж это только показ уха для ОРТ эпоха пилотажа подошла к концу. Будущее за боевыми дронами а все эти сушки для них лишь цели.
Ну это ты зря. Десятки километров для истребителя это ничто. Мы не знаем, как может проходить реальный современный воздушный бой на новых истребителях, так, как никто такого боя ещё не видел. И даже если допустить, что маневренность не столь важна в бою, хотя она является важнейшим критерием при оценке летных качеств самолёта, то она точно необходима при боевых взлётах и посадках, а так же при полётах на малых высотах, при работе по наземным и надводным целям. Да и показуха важна, так, как только наши конструкторы научили летать технику так, как им хочется, а всем остальным остаётся только смотреть и завидовать. А война дронов пока фантастика. Дорого и не надёжно, Ближайшее будущее за сверхманевренными истребителями.
шеф Давайте взглянем правде в глаза страна которая не может собрать надежный автомобиль, холодильник, телевизор, и прочее. Может ли такая страна создать современный военный самолет? Боевая машина это апофеоз сложнейших технологий электроника, компьютерные технологии. Наиболее обьективно оценено состояние российской авиации здесь ari.ru/news/82d7ff112 и здесь продолжение ari.ru/news/0bcb2121f так что уважаемый шеф не согласен я с тобой.
Валерий Золотухин Не совсем понятно, причём тут автомобили, это совсем другая отрасль промышленности, никакого отношения не имеющая к оборонке и к авиастроению. Так уж вышло, что оборонная промышленность у нас всегда финансировалась в первую очередь, и это оправдано. Кстати Камаз каждый год подтверждает, что является самым надёжным грузовиком в мире. Я конечно понимаю, что молодёжи трудно поверить сейчас в Россию, поэтому спорить не буду. Достаточно вспомнить, как в мире создавалось 4 поколение истребителей и насколько удачными получились МиГ-29 и СУ-27. По твоей ссылке ничего объективного нет, обычная пропаганда, расчитаная на тех, кто не интересуется авиацией.
Любой дальнобойщик плюнет вам в лицо по поводу качества камазов так что не надо откровенно врать. А автомобили и прочее тут притом что есть такое понятие как культура производства которая к сожалению полностью утрачена в современной России. По поводу оборонки тоже самое нет тех людей которые создавали действительно хорошее оружие и вы правильно понимаете совковая прапаганда совсем не действует на молодежь люди ездят за границу видят что там и что здесь.
Gone with the wind as all of russian propaganda vehicles xD In fact there're russian vehicles from 60s and 70s on ukraine right now. 2nd army in the world looting toilettes and TVs : - ))
SU-47 is a Soviet designed aircraft they only made one and it was discontinued because of the USSR’s collapse, it is an amazing feat of engineering but it most likely will never be produced again.
And after that, these people say that there is no propaganda in the West...toilets, televisions...Maybe you're also one of those who believes that the Russians are dismantling microwaves to get components for guided missiles?
Yes, it does. fairly limited though. The internal weapons bay helps a lot, and it also has a form of radar absorbent material coating the outer skin. Although it isn't as effective as the F-117 or the F-22 raptor..
Атаджанов, Лев Амаякович - один из создателей ТВ-техники для контроля земной поверхности с высоких орбит. Теоретически обосновал принципы построения высокочувствительной бортовой аппаратуры, работающей с пороговыми сигналами. Акопян, Иосиф Григорьевич - советский конструктор, внёс существенный вклад в разработку теории и практики создания радиолокационных головок самонаведения (РГС) для ракет класса «поверхность-воздух» и «воздух-воздух».
The American's made the first High Performance Stealth Fighter, the Russians made the first Reversed swept wing fighter. If we worked together that combination would be absolutely deadly. Amen to the creators of these two planes. Just goes to show what happens when you put your mind at it.
Гарсоев, Александр - главный «подводник» Советского Союза, первый проектировщик и конструктор советских подводных лодок. Иоаннисиани, Баграт Константинович (Иоаннисьян (1911-1985) - советский конструктор астрономических инструментов. Кемурджиан, Александр Леонович (1921-2003) - советский инженер-конструктор, один из авторов проекта марсохода. Кочарянц, Самвел Григорьевич - советский конструктор, разработчик первых советских атомных и термоядерных боеприпасов и ракетно-ядерного оснащения.
What an impressive machine, love Russian designs... Those vertical stabilizers and huge nose probably make it look like a TU-95 on radar... But what a badass jet!!
This is seriously one of THE most beautiful aircrafts ever made, realy love the forward swept wings!
All their aircraft are American copies, mostly. In this case, the Grumman X29.
@@briancoakley1524 who cares?
@@briancoakley1524 I'll tell you a secret the first fighter was invented by the Soviet Union and the Americans copied the technology
@@briancoakley1524 what are the Flankers copies of?
@@Jules-69lol maybe the Grumman X-29?
russian fighter planes are so aesthetically well-designed. i've been drawing them since a child and they inspire me to be an industrial designer
I hope you managed to make your dream come true
Vincelunceford did you end up as a designer in the end? 😊
Dream came true?
WOOOW , for me is this plane one of the best looking Russians planes !!!!
Your right! The all look shit
looks even more futuristic than the F-22
"looks even more futuristic than the F-22" O_o? It's based off a design built in the early 80's
Nope. It was developed before f-22
yes the stupid f22 is more modern but still if Russia had the money they would have been God's with the plane
‘Looks’ is different than ‘is’
@@redstonewatcher6651 I know.
I think this was more of a technology demonstrator, not intended for full scale production.
It is. Only a couple machines were built and one was crashed.
Dominik MJ The US fooled around with this in the 80's with the X29
Dominik MJ As far as I know the second one has never crashed. It wouldn't ever do, because it has never been finished besides the frame for airtube.
I never said, that both crashed... I said that one crashed. I didn't knew, that the second wasn't completed.... Thought that I have read, that it was also flying... But could be wrong...
Dominik MJ there is only one built as a "flying laboratory" to test new technologies. the second hasn't been ever completed, because one is enough for the tests.
Imagine if instead of Yeltsin, Russia had got putin immediately after ussr. They wouldn't have been broke by 1999. Imagine the completed jets they could have had, mig 1.44, this beauty
The turning is so beautiful, I am crying tears of joy.
I`m European myself but god..this is a beautiful aircraft, i realy like the forward swept wings, just beautiful.
Me to but I FUKIN LOVE RUSSIA!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Ingrid1983, it’s not as beautiful as you.
Agreed
@@HoLeeChit11 simp
@@Jules-69lol 😂
The advantage of the inverted arow wing is that the plane can perform better acrobatics at high angle of attacks with little loss of portance. Also, on a normal wing, the airflow tends to separate (detach) at the tip of the wing, wich makes turbulences around the entire wing; but on an inverted arrow wing, the airflow tends to separate and go on the jonction of the wing with the fuselage, and this gives the plane a better aerodinamic and less turbulences arround the wings.
De langue maternelle Française? “portance” is lift, “jonction” is junction. Bonne description du détachement de la couche liminaire.
The disadvantage is that the high speed performance suffers a lot, and they suffer from a lot of flutter
This is truly an amazing jet. I really dig those short take offs and incredible maneuvers.
I just love this airframe. One thing you can say: The Russians [even though it was more or less inspired by the X-29] pulled off, to make a much more impressive prototype.
But yeah - only a couple of planes were built and just as technology demonstrator. Nothing more.
I also don't really understand the hate here!
Russian planes are rugged, good performing, they have their strengths as they have their weaknesses. American planes [and the few European airframes] are more delicate, more technological advanced.
The raw power of Sukhois are definitely remarkable.
On the other hand, it very much seems, that except of the performance peaks, American aircrafts are much more consistent - better overall performance below the peaks.
And then it comes to the differences of believes and military doctrine: The American doctrine is focussed on the beyond the view tactics - with the dogfight as last resort. But if a dogfight occurs, the technology is assisting the pilot in any way, to let him focus on the action.
The Russian doctrine is still more focussed on close combat [dogfights] - the planes are very good in the hands of a truly excellent pilot in a good condition - but a fight is not as easy to win, if the pilot is average and has to get his way through the overall flight functions.
And then is the last point: both sides [Russia and the US] considered the wing forward sweep as too troublesome, to use it in real warfighters. The End!
***** Sounds again like propaganda! and myths! Well- not completely, as jamming is a common strategy, especially when the muster has to compete against e.g. a 5th gen fighter, which they might not "see".
Jamming is actually a good strategy to increase the survivability - but you also derange yourself and your "comrades". Against an air superiority like the NATO [not only due to advanced combat planes but also due to AWACS, satellite link, etc] this might be their only possibility just to stand a chance...
***** Sorry, you seem like a nice guy, but I don't consider your reply as anything but wish thinking. No fighter is "un-jam'able" - and you need much more as the usual ECM jammer in a "normal" fighter jet, have a reasonable advantage [except of the fact, that the opponent combatant, can't lock on you]!
These are usually the "electronic warfare airframes".
I am not really sure, but I guess, this strategy might be also very vulnerable - as I guess an ARM missile, targeting the electronic emissions can make a very short [and catastrophic] end out of the situation!
And Russia is pushing the development of the Sukhoi T-50 [system designation Pak-Fa] - very well - it is the first completely new developed fighter plane since decades and it is very much quite sophisticated [for Russian proportions]!
***** I think your idea about jamming is somewhat wrong! And every modern jet - if Russian, Chinese, European or American rely heavily on electronics and computers - and especially on high tech sensors, which are based on electro-magnetics and other highly "jammable" technologies!
And - you shouldn't guess. The Russians are planning to deploy 60 T-50's and are on the route to develop an export version as well with the Indians. The Indians are anyway very helpful in fundiing latest military tech, to get their hands on it, for a much lower price than in the West [and they would not get the latest tech, as their security situation - e.g. when India looked for a new generation jet fighter [in the size of a F-35] the US didn't offered the Lightning II, but the latest versions of the Super Hornet and F-16 [Block 50].
The risk of unwanted technology transfer [to Russia] is just far too high in India.
***** agree with you on this, Russians are way less offensive. Lesser aircraft carriers and aircrafts but they can beat the shit out of any any country if they think of attacking Russia. Love their aircrafts though. Especially this one,Pak FA and Su 34.
Ognjen Davidovic I think, your comment shows, that you are delusional!
Russian jets looked always better on the paper, as they really were. Theoretic performance was wow, while the real performance is meh. Just look at the documents, what you can find about the F-16 compared to the Mig-29. Real tests! In an air confrontation, the Mig-29 likely fall out of the sky, because "its superb engines" are so wasteful, that it runs out of kerosene before the enemy fighter can shoot it down, lol.
But you have to take Russian airplanes, for what they are: robust, rather simple and cheap [compared to Western musters].
The most beautiful looking fighter jet on earth.
I'm just going to say, that plane looks incredibly badass.
My No.1 favorite aircraft would have to go to this Su-47 Berkut.
The F-4E & F-14 variants may have been endearing, the F-22A may be a pilot's dream come true... but for me, this is way more dramatic in every way.
Yeah, yeah, X-29 & Tsybin LL-3 and all. This is the fighter that perfected the forward-sweep wings.
I seriously wish this beautiful beauty made it to production. Here's to hopin'!
Он просто изумительный!
Помню в далеком 2006-ом мы с одноклассниками играли в Generals Zero Hour, так там такие были, и мы просто восхищались его внешнему виду! Потрясающий самолет!
I never thought I'd find someone else who played Zero Hour here! Our clan is strong, haha! The Berkut is a beautiful bird, too.
Браћа Руси !!! Велики поздрав из Србије !!!
This plane uses (very) similar design principles to those of the Grumman X 29 research plane. To have predictable flight characteristics it must have computer sensing and control adjustments and the wings must be at once lightweight and rigid enough to resist tip flexing that would otherwise increase to the point of wing failure and/or uncontrolled pitch-up movements.
Bardzo ładny samolot. 👍🇵🇱🇵🇱🇵🇱
I have been looking for this video for years and it just popped into my feed!
If u want a protagonist vibe, go fly an F-22.
But if u want a final boss vibe, then THIS is the best 👍
Wow I love this jet . Russians you build great masterpiece
Beautifully designed aircraft, I wish I could see this bird in real life.
Машина безусловно впечятляет!
Best Looking Plane Ever ! Real Killer !!
Love those reverse-angled wings. :D
Excellently held high angle stall at 1:25, talented pilot.
Quite possibly the prettiest airplane ever made. I think the F22 is a close second.
Su-34 squeeeeeeezes between the two to take second place, sorry ;)
a least some one has an eye for beauty
Nope the YF-23 is prettier
This has got to be the most badass looking plane ever. It's like the Mi-24 of jet planes.
Should have 3D thrust vectoring as well. That plane looks so cool.
it have!
Goofy aah Wings....lol, Seriously tho this 5th Gen Fighter is one of the most interesting designs out there.
Basic
5th gen?
@@Ty-0813RAM coating
Я такой самолет симпатичный на картинках в детской книжке видел еще в 89году ))))
1:03 「わぁ、かっこいい」
I just love this aircraft, at least it looks a lot more like a real fighter jet then the F-22 to me
Nádherná mašina!
Avionics were actually up to date on it for the time, the aero was 5th/6th gen, with actual FBW tech. Only thing it was missing was full stealth.
Im so glad this is playable in multiple games.
2019 back to watching this still amazing
2024 here
Awesome plane! I love Soviet/Russian aviation!
хвала талантам!!! а самолетик старенький-в люфтвафе такой был,а наши-первые в мире кто сумл повторить...но прогрес налицо
Аваков, Вениамин Богданович - конструктор, главный конструктор ОАО СКБК.
Саркисов, Александр Александрович - генеральный конструктор, президент корпорации «Климов». Под его руководством и при непосредственном участии были созданы авиационные двигатели для самолётов, вертолётов и другой техники (Су-15, Су-25, МиГ-29, Ил-114, Ан-140, Як-130, Ми-8ТГ, Ка-32А, Ка-50, Т-80У).
Агаджанов, Павел Артемьевич - один из основоположников советской космонавтики.
благодарю! героев нужно знать!
ロシアの戦闘機はなんでこんなにかっこいいのか
OMG this looks so epic
Привет из 2015! Су-35 вахту принял!
Хотя его еще и сейчас, до сих пор не позно реанимировать...Он до сих пор фору многим даст-по сей день актуален.
I want a model of this, the PAK FA, the YF-23, the F-22A, the F-35B STOVL, and the J-20 up in my doorstep, NOW.
OmegaEGGY I can deliver it in 5 minutes. Pay me 5 million euro, NOW ;)
yog28
Dude, that's way too much for 1/72 plastic models. :P
Okay, can be 1 million ;)
yog28
lol, still too much. xD
OmegaEGGY How about 100$ ?
Most impressive. Fast, agile, well armed and technologically advance, worthy advisory to the F22 but in the end, it's not just the plane, it's mostly the pilot.
This plane is out of this world!
I realy love the Su series
What a beauty!
Man this is a really cool aircraft I love seeing it fly, its so damn strange. I wonder how many bees and/or wasps it could shoot out of the sky before having to rearm.
I built a kit model of this aircraft a couple of years back. Cool design. The US has one, too, but don't remember the number for it.
imádom az orosz gépeket.ők a legjobbak a világon.
it will be the best !
it's discontinued
Bon, alors le Rafale reste le meilleur...
yeah, it's pretty good and combat tested, too. At least until Russian 5th gen fighters kick in :) Unfortunately, we lag behind in terms of advanced avionics in Russia (something like Thales Group). I still don't understand why France dropped plans for its own 5th gen fighter and chose the ridiculous over-priced JSAF program run by USA. France has everything it needs for domestic production.
Oh, Russia...you're the Dodge of militaries.
What do you mean exactly?
This is just about the best Su-47 video I've seen. Most of them have poorer resolution.
I've got to say, Russians make some amazing things. They are also very innovative.
That is a pretty cool looking plane, I wonder if the wings swept forward like that add to performance or if it's just for looks.
Swept forward wings inrcease maneuverability at low speeds.
THE VIDEO IS 16YRS OLD
cool plane looks futuristic
Such a shame this plane never went into production, it’s an amazing machine!
another thing to be proud of my name.
BERKUT
looks so AWESOME!!!!!
Amazing.. Thanks 👍🇳🇿
I came here because of ace combat
Me too i love ace combat i have it in ps2 & 3
You should play Ace Combat 3: Electrosphere. The graphic on the ps1 was just a dream came true.
I played hawx 1 and2
I'm 12 and I played the ps1 it was probably good back then....
One of those birds can take down a whole fleet of craptors :)
When would a situation like that ever arise?
never, I hope :)
That's probably why they're planning on cancelling the craptors, meanwhile the T-50 is going all well as according to plan. What an embarrassment, no?
Says the guy with the nickname and profile picture of the nazi's armed forces.
Timothy Baranow
Oh no, I have an interest!
What a wonderful plane!!!
Beautiful flying art
*one of my Russian fighter jet :D*
SUPER RUSSIAN!!!
I would be so pleased to see it flying with a modern engine design. Truly makes me dreaming.
@kevin...its for both, the swept forward wings distribute the pressure differently than normal wings.
Походу просто крылья перепутали на заводе - и ничего - полетел...
Я горжусь своей страной,ВЕЛИКОЙ РОССИЕЙ,и Нашим много Национальным Народом
лэээ слыш ты че несеш приходи махачкала я тибе пакажу
I love the SU-47.... it may be a tad impractical but they just look bad ass :) my favorite jet of all time is the "Raptor" but i do have to say this jet gets mad props just for how intimidating it could be :)
the most beautiful aircraft ever made
W la RUSSIA! Abbasso USA
plus.google.com/107203290709497505775/posts/SPFHH81HiHG
+Maurizio Candido Grande Maurizio
RUSSİA molodsi!!!
Roman Pavlovic russkie lutchie)))
10 лет прошло а она все еще экспирементальная.В 50х годах за это время эпоха истребителей сменилась.
они отработали то, что считалось мечтой, обратную стреловидность крыла и перешли к летающему крылу в т-50, отрабатывали в кб камова мечту о том чтоб убрать задний стабилизирующий винт на вертолете, использование граунд эфекта, как итог экраноплан и т.д. мы нация мечтателей и теперь отрабатываем на земле мечту сталина о телетанке в проекте армата, ведь основной проект только недавно раскрыли публике, армата это робот без экипажа, в крайнем случае(если бюджета не будет) это просто радиоуправляемый танк с большим радиусом действия(на данный момент до 125км от оператора), у нас много разных задумок и идей, только вот бюджет не резиновый
Я родился,когда страна назывался СССР,выучил язык,когда служил в советской армии.Неделю назад,через Грузии на автомашине вернулись из россии в Армению мои знакомые !Они интересный рассказ мне рассказали!Когда на дороге потерялись и хотели спросит правильный путь,из молодых людей ни кто слово на русском не понимал,им повезло,что встретили старых грузинов,которые объяснили!Я тоже хочу,что русский язык в Армении запретили,закрыли все школы,где учат русский язык,нам это не надо и ни к чему
RUSSIA!!!
+Захер Хер .... sux
Up communism
Those basterds Donald trump thinks the f 35 is literally invisible fer fuk sake people made memes of him like and in general he's a fat fukin basterd just compare him to Vladimir putin😐
I'm takin about America
RUSSIAA!!! SUPPORT FROM THE FREE WORLD!!
Superb!
Красиво смотрится
Современный воздушный бой происходит на расстоянии десятков километров друг от друга это борьба компьютеров и средств обнаружения . Пилотаж это только показ уха для ОРТ эпоха пилотажа подошла к концу. Будущее за боевыми дронами а все эти сушки для них лишь цели.
Ну это ты зря. Десятки километров для истребителя это ничто. Мы не знаем, как может проходить реальный современный воздушный бой на новых истребителях, так, как никто такого боя ещё не видел. И даже если допустить, что маневренность не столь важна в бою, хотя она является важнейшим критерием при оценке летных качеств самолёта, то она точно необходима при боевых взлётах и посадках, а так же при полётах на малых высотах, при работе по наземным и надводным целям. Да и показуха важна, так, как только наши конструкторы научили летать технику так, как им хочется, а всем остальным остаётся только смотреть и завидовать.
А война дронов пока фантастика. Дорого и не надёжно, Ближайшее будущее за сверхманевренными истребителями.
шеф Давайте взглянем правде в глаза страна которая не может собрать надежный автомобиль, холодильник, телевизор, и прочее. Может ли такая страна создать современный военный самолет? Боевая машина это апофеоз сложнейших технологий электроника, компьютерные технологии. Наиболее обьективно оценено состояние российской авиации здесь ari.ru/news/82d7ff112 и здесь продолжение ari.ru/news/0bcb2121f так что уважаемый шеф не согласен я с тобой.
Валерий Золотухин Не совсем понятно, причём тут автомобили, это совсем другая отрасль промышленности, никакого отношения не имеющая к оборонке и к авиастроению. Так уж вышло, что оборонная промышленность у нас всегда финансировалась в первую очередь, и это оправдано. Кстати Камаз каждый год подтверждает, что является самым надёжным грузовиком в мире. Я конечно понимаю, что молодёжи трудно поверить сейчас в Россию, поэтому спорить не буду. Достаточно вспомнить, как в мире создавалось 4 поколение истребителей и насколько удачными получились МиГ-29 и СУ-27.
По твоей ссылке ничего объективного нет, обычная пропаганда, расчитаная на тех, кто не интересуется авиацией.
Любой дальнобойщик плюнет вам в лицо по поводу качества камазов так что не надо откровенно врать. А автомобили и прочее тут притом что есть такое понятие как культура производства которая к сожалению полностью утрачена в современной России. По поводу оборонки тоже самое нет тех людей которые создавали действительно хорошее оружие и вы правильно понимаете совковая прапаганда совсем не действует на молодежь люди ездят за границу видят что там и что здесь.
Ничего ты не понял, не вижу смысла спорить с малолетними извращенцами в ютубе, адью малыш.
Gone with the wind as all of russian propaganda vehicles xD
In fact there're russian vehicles from 60s and 70s on ukraine right now. 2nd army in the world looting toilettes and TVs : - ))
fake news
SU-47 is a Soviet designed aircraft they only made one and it was discontinued because of the USSR’s collapse, it is an amazing feat of engineering but it most likely will never be produced again.
And after that, these people say that there is no propaganda in the West...toilets, televisions...Maybe you're also one of those who believes that the Russians are dismantling microwaves to get components for guided missiles?
Yes, it does. fairly limited though. The internal weapons bay helps a lot, and it also has a form of radar absorbent material coating the outer skin. Although it isn't as effective as the F-117 or the F-22 raptor..
Beautiful aircraft.
Великолепная машина особенно в руках аса мастера. Русские рулят!
Атаджанов, Лев Амаякович - один из создателей ТВ-техники для контроля земной поверхности с высоких орбит. Теоретически обосновал принципы построения высокочувствительной бортовой аппаратуры, работающей с пороговыми сигналами.
Акопян, Иосиф Григорьевич - советский конструктор, внёс существенный вклад в разработку теории и практики создания радиолокационных головок самонаведения (РГС) для ракет класса «поверхность-воздух» и «воздух-воздух».
The American's made the first High Performance Stealth Fighter, the Russians made the first Reversed swept wing fighter. If we worked together that combination would be absolutely deadly. Amen to the creators of these two planes. Just goes to show what happens when you put your mind at it.
Боже какой же он красивый.
Гарсоев, Александр - главный «подводник» Советского Союза, первый проектировщик и конструктор советских подводных лодок.
Иоаннисиани, Баграт Константинович (Иоаннисьян (1911-1985) - советский конструктор астрономических инструментов.
Кемурджиан, Александр Леонович (1921-2003) - советский инженер-конструктор, один из авторов проекта марсохода.
Кочарянц, Самвел Григорьевич - советский конструктор, разработчик первых советских атомных и термоядерных боеприпасов и ракетно-ядерного оснащения.
Finally a Match for the F-22. It might be a head to head fight if they ever have to fight eachother.
خرافية
What an impressive machine, love Russian designs... Those vertical stabilizers and huge nose probably make it look like a TU-95 on radar... But what a badass jet!!
его не закрыли, он работает на полную катушку! =)
it looks so beautiful
This plane is sick
Pretty awesome