Fastest Military Aircraft Above Mach 2 Top Speed Comparison 3D
Vložit
- čas přidán 3. 06. 2021
- SR-71 Blackbird is NOT the fastest.
44 fastest military aircraft above Mach 2 Top Speed Comparison 3D
Featuring
B-58 Hustler
Saab 35 Draken
Chengdu J-7
Eurofighter Typhoon
Chengdu J-20
F-16
Tupolev Tu-160
MiG-21
Saab 37 Viggen
Shenyang J-11
Sukhoi Su-57
BAC TSR2
Panavia Tornado ADV
Mirage 2000
F-104 Starfighter
Chengdu J-10
Northrop YF-23
Sukhoi Su-47
F-4 Phantom II
Mikoyan MiG-35
F-22 Raptor
Sukhoi Su-35
F-107 Ultra Sabre
MiG-29 Fulcrum
Lightning
F-106 Delta Dart
MiG-23 Flogger
Sukhoi Su-27
F-14 Tomcat
Shenyang J-8
F-111 Aardvark
Chengdu J-20
F-15 Eagle
MiG-31 Foxhound
XB-70 Valkyrie
Bell X-2 Starbuster
MiG-25 Foxbat
SR-71 Blackbird
Lockheed A-12
MiG-41
X-51 Waverider
Skylon
SR-72
HSTDV
X-15
NASA X-43A
SHEFEX
Avangard
𝐌𝐔𝐒𝐈𝐂
Whitesand - Vision- Inspirational Piano Music
Whitesand - Fireflies 2
Whitesand - My Spirit Is Free
Check out Whitesand Channel
/ whitesandcomposer
𝟑𝐃 𝐌𝐨𝐝𝐞𝐥𝐬
- own creations
- 3D Warehouse (Awesome)
Per section 1.B.ii of the 3D Warehouse TOC - "Combined Work"
Like, Share and Subscribe to 𝗔𝗺𝗮𝘇𝗶𝗻𝗴𝗩𝗶𝘇
www.amazingviz.net/
Help me Grow this Channel - Věda a technologie
He leaked top gun lol
He really did lol (I was searching for dark star from top gun and found this)
watched it yesterday, incredible movie
you mean the SR-72 sir?
Damn, you're right. 7:03
He did!
The faster they get ,the more they look like my paper airplane designs from primary school.
Everything goes full circle eventually
You had something figured out then lol
Your paper plane move slow
@@patrickorjaliza9174 nah man,fast and straight like an arrow.However now I think about it there was another design that was popular that looked entirely different to the other designs getting banded about that went for speed and distance.This other design (all were copied off friends) looked short and had a broad nose and went for a loopy slow flight.ahh the memories and hours spent.
7:58 this one 😆
This shows just how much ahead of their time engineers from the 50s and 60s were. Golden age for aircraft.
i completely agree,
Unless, of course, our advanced modern designs are not being disclosed for public consumption.
@@drkies super fast planes were used for reconnaissance, we now just use satellites.
Aliens helped
And for many other things too....cars, entertainment, people, etc.
The funny thing is, when it comes to combat, aircraft almost NEVER go supersonic. That's why the newest, most expensive fighters are actually slower than those from the 70's. Studies were done on battles during the Korean war and 0% of combat situations ever were done above mach 1. Even getting to and from fights high speed was rarely used because it destroyed fuel consumption.
The real threat for combat aircraft is ground AA. Even if all in flight combat isn't above Mach 1, having the ability to out maneuver and outrun ground to air missiles is a valuable ability in combat aircraft
Bruh the study was from Vietnam showing that F-4s fly mostly subsonic and sometimes reach Mach 1.2 during combat. There was no supersonic jets in Korea
there were no supersonic jet fighters during the korean war...
aircraft getting slower isn't because reaching mach 2 is useless, but there's more of a focus on ensuring aircraft can "supercruise" aka reach supersonic speeds without the use of afterburners. reaching mach 1.5 without afterburners is a lot more useful than mach 2 with afterburners
I believe the ability to turn a tight circle is the biggest advantage in a dogfight which is why fighters have vectored thrust now. The Japanese zero was a good example of this. British and American pilots were trained not to get into these types of maneuvers with a zero because the zero would always end up behind them.
@@daddyo1176 jets haven’t had a focus on dogfighting ability since the 50’s
I love how a human was the pilot of a thing that was almost seven times the speed of sound 60 YEARS AGO.
7 times the speed of sound is a lot for an airplane but it's nothing if you compare it to the speed of the rocket boosters that is flying towar space :D
Lmao, that's merely a dumb deduction. Scientists today realized that there are things more important than just speed to the aircraft.
It's also the fact the main principle changed, first they needed to go further, then higher, then faster, but the moment the anti air missiles made it all more or less useless, (and the general advance of rockets as carriers of nuclear warheads) they went back to fuel economy, better maneuvering and 'stealth'
All the pilot did was hit the rockets ignition switches, after that he was just a passenger
@@crazyfroggie6546 he still flew horizontally at Mach 6.7. that's insane
6:34
Origin: Rusia
First flight: ASK PUTIN
Well, fair enough
Well, you might as well ask the Holy Lord himself, as it is rather obvious that Mister Putin believe that he (Putin) plays in the same kind of league.. 😸😸 - 😉😉 - 😸😸
Th. Benjaminsson in Sweden - - - 🇸🇪🇸🇪 - 🇪🇺🇪🇺 - - -
Actually, including future aircraft was stupid. Half these aircraft will never fly.
Yes, that is undoubtedly true - but, regarding "Estimated" Top Speed Cabability of a certain Jet Fighter or comparable aircraft is always a mindbuggling work - what can be concidered being absolutely uncompromisingly correct in all imaginable situations?
Th. Benjaminsson - Sweden
* 🇸🇪 * 🇸🇪 *
First flight is expected in 2025.
@@Daan_DV Putin said- Middle of the 20's. Ramjet.
SR 71 has got to be one of the most futuristic looking jets to exist
The XB-70 Valkyrie has the SR-71 beat in the futuristic category. It looks like something straight out of the Imperial fleet in Star Wars.
The F-4 was was ahead of it's time for it's all around capabilities. Incredible service life.
Mach 2+ in 1958 was so far ahead of its time that it took 50 years to retire it! I worked fire control on most of the N/J/S models.
@@earl2688 Going mach 2.2 isn't really "being so far ahead of its time" considering Mig21 was made 3 years before and it could reach a top speed of 2.1 already.
Going at mach 0.10 or 0.15 faster isn't that huge of an "innovation".
Lol MiG-41 First flight: ask Putin. Nice job lol, that made me laugh
лет через 8 я его увижу ;)
@@Otpevatel Он уже есть и летал. Только в 1 экземпляре. Просто это лишком секретно, так как сам понимаешь- Гиперзвуковой истребитель..... У нас есть ещё один интересный истребитель "Чёрная чума", о нём тоже почти ничего не известно, только то, что он патрулирует Арктику.
@@_Vinter_ i dont speak russian
@@_Vinter_
Privyet
@@8Fist
I guess this means hello
Fun how the Blackbird was actually designed to leak fuel like a sieve while on the ground, and had to actively be fueled right up till takeoff. To keep the all-metal construction from tearing itself apart mid-flight, it was built with loose tolerances so that the heat of high speed flight would cause the metal parts to expand and seal themselves back up. They actually had to refuel midair right after takeoff because they used lightweight landing gear to save weight that couldn't handle a full fuel load. They had to make sure everything was operating smoothly after takeoff before they refueled because it wouldn't survive landing with a full load.
We saw the video thanks.
Just imagine how many people would get healthcare with the money spent on development this apparatus!
Miracle of engineering
@@Protein33 that wasnt in the video...
@@Protein33 Your eyes must have been closed because that wasn't in the video
People don't realize how fast the F14 Tomcats were. In a straight line, they'll blow the doors off of all but a handful of the fastest modern jets. Their twin Gen Elec F110 afterburners could produce around 125 kN of thrust EACH.
agreed - what an amazing aircraft, clearly ahead in so many ways, I was blown away to learn it was developed and sketched in the 60/70's ?
The ‘published’ max for the F15 is 2.5 yet there is a safety wired switch labeled ‘VMAX’ in the cockpit that raises some of the limits on the engines and airframe that will allow it to move quite a bit faster. If the safety wire is broken, testing must be done to ensure continued serviceability.
FYI the F 15-A was a mach 5+ fighter. Been there done that twice...
@@kinkusdudeus Really.... I worked on them for over 7 years.... did you fly them? I knew several that did. And worked on all the avionics and instrumentation. NEXT ?
@@fanman421 I was an O T & E crew chief.
@@kinkusdudeus Yeah, I was part of the operational test of first of the A’s and B’s at Luke AFB, 58 TFW, Then the first NATO deployment of two squadrons of B’s. Many good memories at both bases. I would imagine there were many times you pushed the button on the failed unit indicator panel in the nose wheel well, and called out 081, 041, and 022, to be pulled for test and repair. When they were delivered to the shop, the guys would connect them to the test stations to check them out and replace parts as needed. My AFSC, 32670, Integrated Avionics Aerospace Ground Equipment Specialist, was for maintenance of the test equipment itself. The tech school for that was 9 months long at Lowery in Denver. 😉
@@fanman421 Yeah those damn buttons. When were you at Luke? I had the joy of working on 74-111 for Fred when nobody else could make that broken pos flight worthy. I stole new engines from the engine shop and would swap them out the night before he was going to fly so he had good engines. And steal radar parts and any avionics that had failed also. Anything to make it fly.
I love the Mig 41
"Origi: Russia"
"First flight: Ask Putin"
Hilarious! 🤣
Hey! Don't laugh! If mr. Putain said so it must be true 😡🥳
Ya 🤣🤣🤣
Не обольщайся. Скоро премьера. Записывайся на тест-драйв.
P.S.: Если не трус, конешно.
@@Pekokakko q.q..
@@mihail3588 пфф. Мультики как всегда?
The SR-71's true top speed was and still is classified at mach 3.2+. Remember the airstrike on Libya in 86? The pilots exceeded mach 3.2 when some SAM's were fired at it. I remember one saying they were approaching mach 4 when they throttled back. I was stationed at The Blue Cube at the Satellite control facility in Sunnyvale, Ca.at that time and we were in contact with JCS and HQ USAF during that mission. Can't hit it if you can't see or catch it.
That’s exactly right. Also very cool that you got to witness it as it was happening.
Idolized the SR-71 when I was a kid. I built many jet models and would hang them from my bedroom ceiling. The SR was one of my favorites as well as the F-4 and F-14. Of course Top Gun is still the best movie ever made.
The man who gave the orders for the Libya air strike was a patient of mine. He told me the “real story”!
Altho the manual for SR-21 is in public domain
A velocidade máxima relatada em um Blackbird é de MACH 3.9.
The issue here is that with the exception of the SR-71 and perhaps the Mig 31, none of these speeds are cruising speeds. They are just the maximum speeds at the right altitude that can be maintained for 1 or 2 minutes at most.
The Foxbat could do Mach 3+ but it destroyed it's engines in the process so it's maximum safe speed is around mach 2.8, the same as the Foxhound
there was a reason pilots for the SR-71 had to wear spacesuits.
@@seekerpro486 mig 31 and 25 pilots also wore spacesuits (light)
Fun fact: The US has actually breached mach 31. Its called Apollo 11. They reentered at 24 thousand MPH. Although, we have gone even faster. We have gotten up to just under mach 38.5 with the Stardust return capsule. Yeah. Rockets go REALLY fast.
"Have you seen the Black Bird in flight?"
Of course not that's like going in the speed of a bullet but times 3.5
Me: "of course not, It was 1965"
I wish we would have seen it from the outside at 85,000 feet passing something slower and then video from behind of the colossal engines in full ramjet mode.
I sat in one and saw it fly at Norton AFB.
@@journeyquest1 Kkomrade o7
He actually meant a bird
They got one on display in Georgia. Absolutely beutiful
The mig-25 is old and still is impressive the things it can do
Imagine what it could’ve been if the Soviet made a higher quality variant of it that doesn’t made out of nickel steel alloy and engines that didn’t last just around 150 hours. Sure as an interceptor it really does not need high maneuverability but those weight reduction could’ve pushed the aircraft even faster.
@@dannyzero692 that's the MIG-31, another "a lot of records" breaker plane, that is the actual interceptor of Russia
@@dannyzero692 adding to my last comment, the MIG-31 has since it's introduction 1975 some stuff that where new and introduced today planes like targeting enemy planes for your group or guiding allied misiles shot, a navegation computer (Rita) that talk to the pilot. The mig-31 has been modernized several times with newest radars, engines, sensors, led screen interfaces, with the newest sensors it's the chassis of a 1975 plane that reach match 3.5 and reach altitudes of 123500feet. Search mustard CZcams channel and his video about the MiG-25, at the end he talks about the mig-31
@@internetisinteresting7720 The 25 was an interceptor as well, and was official until the 31 took its place. The engines used were R-15-300s, which were limited use, missile engines, rather than dedicated jet engines. And yes, the 25 also had low maneuverability due to the heavy, structural wings and heavy material choice. The 31 corrected a lot of these issues
@@dannyzero692 a long way to describe the MiG-31
The SR-71 is my favorite aircraft. Maybe not as heavily armed as the Eagle but it's gonna sneak up on them MiGs real quiet like and shoot them with its camera.
My neighbor is an old F-4 Phantom pilot. He saw a little action in Vietnam. I keep telling him to write a book. He had his share of close calls and narrow escapes from MiGs.
These are my 3 favorite aviation books:
- Her Majesty's Top Gun by Sharkey Ward
- Phantom II by Val Ross Johnson
- Great Fighter Jets of the Galaxy 1 by Tim Gibson
Lol russia entered the chat
I just learned of the Skylon SSTO with this video and as a Kerbal Space Program fan, I am very excited to see something like this exists
" *Drops a tiny screw* "
*GONE TO A DIFFERENT DIMENSION*
Now that's speed.
The F15 model you used was my unit's flagship plane. Very cool to see the 173FW represented in one of your videos!
Very cool!!!
Were you part of 1999. mission over Yugoslavia?
Do you know if the f15 or 16 were stealthy on radar. The f16 is labeled as a stealth in the video and I've never known anything about that
@@XxSoGRAMBOxX wow
Looks like they're stationed in Oregon? The inside of the tail looks like the State of Oregon
So SR71 being that fast in 1964,just imagine what they're hiding from us in 2022.
0:50 J-20 goes Mach 2.0
5:20 J-20 goes Mach 2.5
such acceleration!
The SR-71 is still my favorite. Nothing you can say will change my mind.
You know it's badass if the X-Men use one for their main transport vehicle.
SR-72
I remember hearing SR-71 pilot Brian Shul get asked how fast the plane could really go and and he just chuckled and said "faster than the book says it can."
Little known fact but it was meant to be the RS71, but they made a typo and stuck with SR71.
Nice, if not very maneuverable...
Amazing that after all these years, the X-15 still rules supreme... Above that, only unmanned. Missiles should've not been included in this video, not exactly "aircraft", and they only fly once... But since we include suborbital vehicles we should include the Space Shuttle (Mach 28) ate the top of the list, and it is a crewed aircraft.
I would say that technology demonstrators like the X-43 count
So the Chinese claim. LOL!! India? They can't even pick up their trash they scattered all over the Moon. 😆😂🤣
Hey you from which country
@@SUNDARAN.. China.
@@MAGGOT_VOMIT I don't know if you're trying to trigger any Indians, but one thing I must say is that China is no better than anything :)
I love when it goes over the top - like the x-51 at mach 5+ with a guy riding it like a horse! :)
Oh yeah!
*MiG-41*
First flight: Ask Putin
Sure, the next time we catch up for Vodka i will remember to ask
Ah yes the MiG-31, my favorite speedy boi
Ahhh yes ekpic plane made to chase the sr1/blackbird.
@@riccccccardo the mig-25 was the speedier boi, chasing blackbirds
Mine is mig-29 cus of how cool it looks
@@kingofallgodzillas9901 yeah mig-29 is hella sexy. Heck, every fucking russian aircraft looks hella sexy. Maybe not the mig-21 but everything else for sure.
Nah, X15.
I love the little character cameos, those are a nice touch.👍
agreed 🛩
@@supercheese905 👍👍👍
I love how all of Russia's are hypothetical 😂
Proud to see India in top 5 of the list.... Jay Hind 💫🇮🇳
*Sees J-20 twice*
Me: Confused screaming
😁😁😁
There were two versions of the J20, the fast and faster J20. Lol.
There are two versions, one with the AL-31 saturn (prototype and initial production) and the faster one with WS-10A (current production). I didn't see the second J-20 so I don't know if it's accurate.
@@Gongolongo
Take a look again. Pls. 😊
@@Gongolongo I can't see the WS-10 being faster when the WS-10A has lower thrust than the AL-31F in the J-20
Notably, you missed the North American A/RA-5 in your list of military aircraft capable of Mach 2.0+ speed at 40,000 feet. On 13 December 1960, an A3J variant set the world altitude record of 91,450.8 feet (27,874.2 m), carrying a 1000 kilogram payload. According to Wikipedia and other sources, the crew, Navy Cmdr. Leroy Heath, pilot, and Lt. Larry Monroe, navigator/bombardier, accelerated the Vigilante to Mach 2.1 and then flew upward in a ballistic trajectory until the engines flamed out. At the top of the arc it rolled on its back and nosed down. Heath righted the aircraft and restarted the engines. They landed safely.
They also mussed the MIG-25 Foxbat, literally the fastest fighter craft ever made
@@DrRaccoon-ux9gq 6:07
russia best
You forgot Mach 33: Me when my girlfriend's husband gets home.
My 2 very favorite plans in existance are the F-4 Phantom and the A-10 Warthog/Thunderbolt. Beautiful planes... My dad was on the USS Constellation, and it was the first aircraft carrier deck to ever launch an F-4 Phantom... He's proud of that one
@Freddie Bloggs lol that's what everyone says, but I think it's a damn sexy looking plane. I love it man
US Marine Corps. I served in all three Marine Air Wings. Phantoms will forever be my favorite combat aircraft. The Harrier is a strong second place and in third is the A-4 Skyhawk. Both were the kings of Marine close air support in their day.
Great to see these visualized and their history summary given!
However... I don't usually think of the F-16 as "Stealth"...
Ground breaking avionics but it having stealth capabilities slipped by me also👍
Ah yes, the F-16 stealth air superiority fighter
I was thinking the most unstealthy stealth fighter
1974 technology in modern age global aerospace technology.....garbage. Meanwhile, record military budgets, more than any other nation.
@@plutonium8879
US aircraft from the 1960s cannot even be matched by other nations today. There is a reason why the US has twice as many fighter aircraft as the Russians and Chinese combined.
The US welfare state costs 2.5 trillion per year and the military budget is nothing compared to it.
Lol ikr
@Cody Mcconnell The maker of these videos is obviously either russian, or a russian jet fanboy. Saying that a study in 2008 found that each Su-35 (from the 80s) could shoot down 2.4 F-35s? And most other american planes say little more than "was fast", "made a lot of them", or have some mostly negative connotation about it. The F-14 for example "with wings swept back it could make the mach 2.4 speed requirement set by the navy". Or the SR-71 "Could only be flown once per week because of the heavy maintenance. Often came back with rivets and parts missing". Because those are clearly the most interesting facts about those aircraft.... But yet almost every russian made aircraft has some.fact about it basically being better than some western made plane, other otherwise states how more better than everything else it is. LMAO
Don't forget the Space Shuttle @ Mach 25.
For those wondering why interceptor aircraft were faster in the 1960s, they discovered during Vietnam that essentially no dogfights occurred at speeds faster than the speed of sounds. But more importantly, fuel efficiency decreases exponentially past the sound barrier, which significantly reduces the operating range of aircraft, which in the age of hypersonic missiles is substantially more important than speed. This is why the F-4 Phantom from the 50s is substantially faster than the modern F-35.
People want to be fast, but sometimes you must stop to see real beauty... or video like this 😉
Bandit where is my fucking cocaine.
@@StormFox_1 uhhhh... Drugs? I dont know, man. Where did you buy it? Maybe, you should ask your dealer...
Auf Wiedersehen
@@bandit327 You are my dealer damn it.
This comment is so..
Cringe
Okay fortune cookie Maverick
The X15 was flown in 1959 at Mach 6.
Think about that.
It was manned.
They had no clue what Mach 6 would do to a person.
And just two years later they launched a dude all the way to orbit. Crazy shit.
What I wouldn't do to be a fly on the wall when they were briefing the piolet
That knew what mach 6 would do to a person, nothing. Its not velocity that is a problem for humans, its acceleration. Right now you are moving at over 1000 mph because of Earth moving but you don't notice it. Velocity doesn't harm people. You must watch too many movies.
@@Nick-tm2sw
So you’re telling me he started flying at Mach 6???
Or did he have to accelerate to Mach 6???
Per your words..
Acceleration is the issue.
At best he started at Mach 1.
Still needed to go thru 5 more Mach levels.
Did they have the flight suits they do today to compress blood to keep form blackout??
@@mikemosley535 the problem is the sudden change in velocity not the top speed. Sitting in a plane going mach 6 would feel no different than one going 500km/h.
Every one says that the X-15 is the fastest but no, the SR-71 is the fastest AIRPLANE, so that declairs it the fastest because the X-15 is a rocket engine
F4 phantom was technically capable of mach 3+, and was recorded at mach 2.9 in Sept 1960
Bullshit.
Proud to see an Indian program in top class ,
🇮🇳🇮🇳🇮🇳
Pity the Avro Arrow was canned before it was allowed to set records. It was going to be comfortably a Mach 2.5 plane and was heading into the Mach 3 brigade.
Only Canadians care.
@@matthewdavies2057 Yes, Canadians do care, because the cancellation of the Arrow gutted their entire aerospace industry and destroyed a huge amount of technological design in Canada.
@@CyrusdVulture I'm Canadian and it does get tiresome. Nobody is stopping us from getting back in to aviation in a big way...oh wait we had that federal election a few days ago. 😏
@@CyrusdVulture agreed. All our talent went to the Americans and the Brits fostering the biggest increase in aerospace technologies. Just not in Canada. Thanks Diefenbaker.
A lot the engineers went to Nasa furthering the space race
Music got unexpectedly epic as we approached Mach 3 and above, lol!
The Apollo shuttle reached Mach 32 on re-entry with a crew of three in 1969. The Space Shuttle Challenger reached Mach 23.5 before its explosion. The Space Shuttle missions performed both civilian and military missions. The Avangard is an unmanned missile.
such high speeds caused by lunar escape
@@weseethehypeoutside True on the Apollo shuttle which used lunar escape to reach that speed but the Challenger was being propelled by its engines right after take off when it exploded.
@@weseethehypeoutside They have a glide vehicle in the top slot, so shuttles should be included, or the glide vehicle removed.
@@toddjones1480Don't forget, here we are shown objects which reach those high speeds within the atmosphere, not in space where there is no air resistance and friction.
Looks like the author had to put Russian flying device as fastest, because he may be a Russian nationalist. Don’t forget there is a war going on in Ukraine. Let’s pray for to the war to end, and Russia to lose it. Fuck Putin.
Nice vid! One small point: The single-seat A12 did not have those notches in the chines up by the nose. It's the YF-12 interceptor that had those notches.
You forgot the aircraft for which I served as a Plane Captain on in the US Navy. The RA-5C Vigilante was a high-altitude Mach 2.1 reconnaissance aircraft that began as a high-speed nuclear bomber. It served from 1961-1979.
Thank you for using my aircraft
Cool story bro! 👍🏻
who asked
@@RedBeardBookie Sorry. I forgot to ask your permission. Next time I will.
Hey what about the The RA-5C Vigilante?
SR-71 blackbird always been my fav!! but seeing the father of the Blackbird, never saw that before!! I have to look up that history!
It may seem like they were way ahead in the 60s and 70s. Imagine seeing what what is classified in modern aircraft.
"pure glide vehicle"
ok. So is the Buran and the Space shuttle. The latter of which was designed to military spec and for military purpose.
Buran was powered
@@Can_E_ only on the way up.
Both shuttles glided back.
I imagine the X37B falls in this category also... The speeds obtain are beyond human endurance... The Space Shuttle was a remarkable vehicle in its own right...
@@t.d.phillips7283
It's not speed that can get beyond our endurance, it's acceleration.
Skylon probably won't be built as is post spacex but that was going to be human rated and it's orbital sprint is Mach 5 to Mach 25.
Which'll certainly put a smile on your face, regardless.
@@MostlyPennyCat with acceleration like that I wouldn't worry about the smile on my face as much as the residue in my lower suit...
Just reminding that the first airplane is invented just 100 years ago.. I remember watching a video where people thought that it's probably impossible to break the sound barrier yet here we are, casually going supersonic..
And to think, supersonic is now boring. All about the hypersonic lol.
@@dylan-5287 i know - high hypersonic
I keep seeing the XB-70 listed as a bomber. . . .but at Wright Patterson Air Force Museum, the display says there is no bomb-bay area. . . it is all engine and gas tank . . and the plane was built only as an experimental platform for large tonnage sustained supersonic flight. . .and it only theoretically could only have Hound Dog "pre-cruise missiles" on external pylon mounts.
Admit it, You guys came here after watching TOP GUN: Maverick to see how fast is a F-14 and a F-22 Raptor
4:41
Maverick. Goose
"Top Gun"
🔥🔥
Lets talk about actual aircraft not pipe dreams, until it flys, the MIG41 is a pipe dream.
Add the scam that is Skylon to that list as well.
Did you ask Putin?
@@INdaBORZOM The X-15 was man controlled?
@@danielmayfield8262 Somehow yes it was
@@danielmayfield8262 *Yes.*
Off the subject but am wondering who made the melodies in the back ground ?
It’s amazing how much war pushes innovation
I remember those F-104s breaking the sound barrier when i was a kid back in the 60s....they also made a howling whistle sound that was ear candy to a Kid! 😆
They crying wolf was nicknamed...
They kind of wrecked this by
-putting in planes that haven’t even been built -and some sort of glide vehicle that fundamentally doesn’t even fly, it’s simply controls it’s drop, like a fancy brick.
- And the X43A data is quite misleading, it takes a plane and a booster to get it high where the air is thin and then when there it flips on its engines and though it goes very fast this only lasts for 10 seconds before the engine dies and then it begins to glide and eventually crash land in the ocean…is this really a plane?
Really confuses the video and devalues it.
I mean yeah if gliding things are valid, the Space Shuttle Orbiter beats them all its wings taste atmosphere when its still going 22x sound.
@@filanfyretracker military
I vote the U.S.S. Enterprise (not the carrier). Warp-9 ftw.
@@shinji5217 The STS way very military-focused.
@@tankpenguin175 is et
Fun fact about the SR-71 (aka blackbird) was that the actual name was supposed to be called RS-71, but the president said this incorrectly at the time so it was renamed what we know it as today. 😎
Imagine what the U.S. has now that we just don’t know about 😧
After all this time I still love the look of YF23 and SU47.
YF-23 is at 2:46
They are wacky in design but look hella cool. What pretty cool is that Putin himself flew in the su-47. Yes, one of the most important people on the planet flew in an experimental aircraft.
Be funny if it just scrolled over a random ass X-Wing out of nowhere.
That was fun to watch, thanks for making it.
the mach 20 one at the last looks like the paper aiplanes we used to make as kids.
Ok am I the only one that spotted Ironman hanging onto the f22 wing? 😂😂 @3:24
Nope. But you missed Hulk at 03:06.
Glad you included HSTDV, actually it was flown to mach 6.5 just for validating the scramjet technology, HSTDV is actually just a tech demonstrator, it will be taken to mach 10 in the next test
Edit- not mach 10 but mach 12.
Amazing
Yes it was just a preliminary test flight -Proud Indian
Rookie numbers ! On our planet we achieved warp drive technology
@@iamasmurf1122 On your… planet?
@@spartannige3296 easy there m8, just a joke.
I wonder how the Skylon SSTO would be able to reenter atmosphere with its engines exposed at the wing end?
Just a minor note; The starfighter had Canadian markings not American. Although the Canadiens did buy the Starfighter off of The Americans. Also you may want to include the Avro Arrow that flew from the 50s to the killing of the project in 1959. With the Iroquois engines it was to break mach 3.
I loved the F-4 Phantom shot, with The Hulk sitting in a WWII Jeep.
Reminder that Blackbirds top speed is still classified, and people who worked on it laugh at videos like this.
Indeed.
I watched a documentary on the yf-23. They said that they couldn't give numbers due to confidentiality but said that it was much faster than the f22.
Technology is a monster. In less than a 100 years we went from primative wooden planes to planes that can fly fly into space to mass produced commercial planes that can be used as weapons of mass destruction. It's too much change too soon
I remember as lad in the 50's Peter Twiss becoming the first man to do 1'000 mph in level flight in the Fairey Delta 2 .🇬🇧
Very beautiful plane
Always always always take Chinese specifications with a grain of salt.
To be fair, you probably can't make these claims nowadays without some satellite verifying their flight speeds from space.
the SR-72 hasn't even been flown and claiming mach 6, now that's suspect
Because it's too bland ?
better than over estimate than underestimate
Wait the dark star went Mach 10 not Mach 6.0
Can't fool me by putting a missile and a glide vehicle ahead of the X-15. You just didn't want an American aircraft to be number 1 huh? It is though, and we all see that.
Yep! I noticed that too
Straight up, these lists always try to downplay US accomplishments and it's so weird...
To be fair the X-15 isn't even a true plane, it got launched off a carrier then reached that high speed, same with that rocket and that 2 megaton 20,000 mph highly maneuverable overpowered glider
so, if is not amercian not count? don't try, if the americans build a glide or missile that runs fast like this, people like you would make the greatest scandal of all times.
americanist aways complaining about nonsense, CHILDISH!!!
by X-15 and X-43 being in the list, even X-43 with controversial information was included without question, also even though both are not airplanes, this video was very friendly to americans.
btw, i'm not from rus or usa, 'm watching the fight from outside and your complaint is pretty pointless, a lot.
Another great job! It seems like the schemes you like to use are similar to current RC Plane models (Arrows F-15 for example) 👊🏻💥👊🏻
6:55 love the Empire logo on the wing 😂
VIDEO HELPED ME OUT ALOT!!! KEEP THE CONTENT COMING!!!
The Mig 25 Foxbat is just a engineering miracle, what an aircraft...
123k ft altitude that's insane for a soviet era airplane.
@@darkguitarist3476 And those limitless Rockets only capped by fuel lol
F22 and F23 actually have a higher max speed...it's just that their afterburner stats are secret. All the other US fighters are using their afterburner speeds
yes, of course.. And only the Russians and the Chinese merge the true performance of the aircraft into the network.. Neither the author nor you know or recognize the real characteristics.. So keep fantasizing..))
Yeah, theres AB probably melts ,like F35 Hahahaha......
Il est oi le meilleur avions de chasse au monde :le rafale(bien meilleur que le f22 raptor)
Every platforms have their own advantages and disadvantages
We don't want a war to happen so peace guys
@@user-qi8nz8gm7h it’s not it’s speed it is it’s electronics warfare Suite that truly makes any fighter these days. Thats why the F22 was never sold or left unattended in allied hangers, or ours as well. We ETechs had a saying when I was still ‘in’. “Leave it in the Cellar till it ripens to a true ambrosia fitting of the times. Just let it chill a while longer”. China just might cause us to drag some of it out!
Миру Мир ! Птички красивые. Сколько труда ушло на создание этих машин , представить сложно.
Hahah 😂
И не говори. Кажется порою даже, что весь гений человека направлен на полет.)
@@pickle6599 и все равно при этом до совершенства ещё ой как далеко
@@user-yn5jc9rs1r почему же? Мы достигли совершенства в стремлении мочить друг друга... Почти все птички военные. Хотя не спорю, красиво. Но все же жаль, что мечта о сверхскорости "после работы сгонять за час на другой континент помочь коллегам решить научную проблему" выродилась в "догнать и замочить, чтобы, хм... партнёры с тебя последние штаны не сняли".
@@Art-RR и не говори
The Skylon is definitely an emergency orbital escape pod.
Whats the difference between fighter, interceptor, and air superiority classes? In this presentation they are discussed as different while I think they are more or less the same (purpose: win air-air engagements)
The French strategic nuclear bomber Dassault Mirage IV is missing, able to reach Mach 2.2...
Mirage G at 2.34 too
Strange, nobody remembers the French...
No, the data was classified.
Perhaps
Also missing
Mirage III max speed Mach 2.2 first figth 1956 introduced in 1961
Mirage 2000 max speed Match 2.2 fist figth 1976 introduced 1984
The Foxbat in Ace Combat was crazy fast but handled like a schoolbus in a Nascar race.
7:17 fun fact, the sr-72 will be optionally manned, so a pilot could fly it but is not required to
Apollo 11 travelled at Mach 31, with 3 men aboard, although it didn't spend much time in the Earth's atmosphere.
In 1970, I was first introduced to the B58 Hustler as a young kid which happened to be my first model airplane.
@@applicationuser9764 ayo??
I think i saw one a long time ago at Wright Pat in Dayton Ohio.
I had one of those models. Do they still make plastic model airplanes?, or are they all gone?
@@keithfaulkner6319 They still make model airplanes, albeit mostly the more popular models of old and of course the newer models. As for the B-58, I've not seen a model kit in well over 10yrs if I recall correctly. I wish I still had the patience, eyesight & space to do this hobby again. If you want a model; Ebay has them brand new ranging from $20-100 depending on scale.
@@artierodriguez8334 thank you. I too got old. I don't trust ebay. Then again my only contact with the outside world is my not-so-smart-phone.
@@keithfaulkner6319 Ebay like any other site has its flaws; but they do protect buyers more than sellers. As an Ebay seller; I say this from experience. If you ever find you would like to try to build one; try Ebay with confidence. I may just do the same sometime in the New Year.
Thanks for this, but it would be good to have an indicator of which are implemented. A couple of these are concepts right now, and their performance is a wish-list.
The SR-72 has been flying for several years. The MiG 41 is a thought concept.
@@dragunovbushcraft152 that is false. The SR-72 has not flown as it has not been assembled yet. It's suggested by some to fly by 2023 or 2025, but those dates are gonna vary anyways.
@@Sam_McCall Seen too many "donut on a rope" trails in Cali, to believe you.
@@dragunovbushcraft152 well it's probably something else then.
@@Sam_McCall Nothing else makes "Donut on a rope".
The perfect combat fighter can fire and hit successfully from a distance, be unseen and then escape out of range quickly.
7:57 Love the Mr. Putin with his shirt off next to a bottle of vodka.
Although I'm an Indian but at 7:22 I'm surprised to know that India also has one Hypersonic flight system.
Yes 😳
Wtf u haven't heard about hsdtv test 😢😢 of drdo
I think it’s a drone
Am also seeing this first
It is hypersonic glide vehicle
loving how the destroyed quality of the last music piece compared to the original makes it more badass
"THE GREAT............WESTERN..........TRENDKILL.......THAT'S RIGHT!!"
where did you get your information from?
27 махов!!! Это просто невероятно! Их чего должен быть сделан корпус чтобы не сгореть в атмосфере Земли при такой скорости?! Это же около 9 км в секунду!