Tolerance Stackup: Simple Assembly

Sdílet
Vložit

Komentáře • 62

  • @MPKFPV
    @MPKFPV Před 2 lety +21

    The phase of your explanation meets my understanding speed, thanks a lot for your time in making people learn what you gained. Awesome work 🙏🏽

  • @danc1279
    @danc1279 Před 8 měsíci +5

    (as one who for 8yrs. taught classroom CAD & co-wrote user guides) Really, really well done! smooth pace, good example & diagram, articulate easy to understand audio, even the very thoughtful 'quiet' jazz in background, further putting the listener at ease and makes the mind open. another 'like' & new subscriber here.

  • @Kamabushi999
    @Kamabushi999 Před 2 lety +19

    Finally, someone whose accent I can understand. Thank you very much, I am subscribed. The teacher is very important, we can't all learn from the same style of teaching.

    • @RDeanOdell
      @RDeanOdell  Před 2 lety +5

      Great to hear! I wasn’t aware I had a particular accent, but I’m happy the video works for you.

    • @Kamabushi999
      @Kamabushi999 Před 2 lety +6

      @@RDeanOdell
      I meant your enunciation is American
      and I can understand
      Most videos are from India and can not understand their pronunciation
      I am pretty much tone deaf i guess.

    • @ninadgadre3934
      @ninadgadre3934 Před 3 měsíci +1

      @@RDeanOdell All speakers have accents ;), only that we consider our personal accent as default, and other accents as 'accents'. Love your video, thanks for the simple explanation!

  • @joshuasaha5068
    @joshuasaha5068 Před 2 měsíci

    I've been a working engineer work several years and your videos are still helpful to reference! Thank you

  • @pratikbabhulkar2295
    @pratikbabhulkar2295 Před 11 měsíci +2

    Thank you so much for making this video. Four years of college and you explained it in under 7 minutes

  • @nishantbhosle1268
    @nishantbhosle1268 Před 2 lety +4

    Best video on WC analysis ever! Good job mate! Thanks for this video!

  • @praveenmuduli9255
    @praveenmuduli9255 Před 6 měsíci +2

    U made it so simple. Thank you for doing this.

  • @ajayramm1315
    @ajayramm1315 Před 6 měsíci +1

    Dude you made it more simple for worst case, thank you

  • @Gulam360
    @Gulam360 Před rokem +1

    Thanku sir i am from India 🇮🇳 it's very important knowledge for us i am working in R&D department in world top 10 tractor manufacturing company thanks

  • @harikrishnan-ur2mf
    @harikrishnan-ur2mf Před 2 lety +5

    The clean and clear explanation can you do more videos in assembly-oriented stack-ups...

    • @RDeanOdell
      @RDeanOdell  Před 2 lety +3

      Thank you! I’ll get some more tolerance stack up videos out soon.

  • @ketandeshpande6149
    @ketandeshpande6149 Před rokem +4

    The way of explanation is very simple and understandable. Lots of things to learn from you. Kudos!

  • @HurstNidec
    @HurstNidec Před rokem +2

    Thank you for this real world demonstration.

    • @RDeanOdell
      @RDeanOdell  Před rokem

      You’re welcome, thanks for watching!

  • @MechInvent
    @MechInvent Před 7 měsíci +1

    You would make a killer joker with that voice 😎
    But in all seriousness, thanks for the clear teaching video.

  • @anilkumarpasala
    @anilkumarpasala Před rokem +2

    Ur the best. I have learned the concept just with 2 videos. Definitely you don't have many views for your valuable videos because people are not interested in valuable content their interest is always on tiktok. Don't get dissatisfied please educate us

    • @RDeanOdell
      @RDeanOdell  Před rokem

      Thankyou so much! I'm thrilled my videos are helpful!

  • @larsjustesen297
    @larsjustesen297 Před 2 lety +3

    Thanks mate i just started a new job and what you are learning me is much better information than the old dudes in the measurements department ever could have teach me 😂

    • @RDeanOdell
      @RDeanOdell  Před 2 lety

      Great to hear! I’m glad you find my content useful at work.

  • @owaindavies7145
    @owaindavies7145 Před 14 dny

    Is there a reason why the slot dimension at 4:44 is +/- 0.2 rather than +/- 0.4?
    My thinking is that the two ends of the slot both have +/- 0.2, so regardless the gap must be +/- 0.2 from both end stops - so 0.4?

  • @mvmcali6900
    @mvmcali6900 Před rokem +4

    This dude is Tarzan with an engineering degree

    • @RDeanOdell
      @RDeanOdell  Před rokem +2

      Lol, I’ll take it. Thanks for watching.

  • @nguyentri5467
    @nguyentri5467 Před rokem +1

    Thanks for your teaching. Really appreciate

  • @vinaysalvi8203
    @vinaysalvi8203 Před 11 měsíci

    Thanks a lot for your hard work to explain it in such a simple way, also the inspection check which you do hands on really makes it easy to understand GD&T, really really thanks a lot for your efforts, please do make such videos which makes understanding engineering so easy and fun. Thanks a lot!!!

  • @imrghulam1
    @imrghulam1 Před rokem

    Great video. Lets say the nominal clearance is 1mm if the positive direction to right. By shifting the positive direction to left then the nominal clearance gives -1mm. So, how to determine the direction because the sign changes for the nominal clearance which depends of the positive direction.

  • @IndiTechValves
    @IndiTechValves Před 5 měsíci +1

    Great explanation. Easy to understand.

  • @handsnow
    @handsnow Před 2 měsíci

    I was just wondering if we could change 5+/-0.02 to 5.13+/-0.02, it seems also meet the requirement

  • @Kpax72
    @Kpax72 Před 5 měsíci

    What about hole to hole basic dims not called out from the datum? Stack error

  • @Reapwhatsown
    @Reapwhatsown Před rokem +1

    Thought he was going show the RSS calc that has worst case interference situation very improbable.
    For each part the MMC condition is ~2% probable.
    For them all to be at MMC simultaneously is much much less.

    • @RDeanOdell
      @RDeanOdell  Před rokem +1

      Hi, yes this is just simple worst case analysis. It is very unlikely everything comes in at worst case, but in my opinion, this gives some room for error in the stackup. If something is not accounted for, there is so much conservatism built in already that it should be okay.

  • @jon-williammurphy9780
    @jon-williammurphy9780 Před 11 měsíci

    Well, no, at 3:40 when you say "this part wouldn't work" - that's not true, statistically this part would work / not work HALF the time. Tightening the tolerances doesn't it just "might not meet the requirements" it's entirely identical.

  • @andrehansen2488
    @andrehansen2488 Před 6 měsíci +1

    Really good video. Thank you for that!
    Music a bit too loud

  • @learnkartmechanical1309
    @learnkartmechanical1309 Před 2 lety +1

    1.please explain with reference to Worst case and RSS method.
    2.What is Assembly shift in stack-up
    3.How to use cp and cpk process capability. for tolerances
    4.How to create vector loop (Shorter loop with examples)
    5.What is ppm Rejection how to understand it
    6.What to do in case if tolerances are not equal bilateral
    Thanks for your Efforts appreciated.

    • @RDeanOdell
      @RDeanOdell  Před 2 lety +1

      Hi,
      Let me see what I can do to address some of your questions.

  • @ud4458
    @ud4458 Před 9 měsíci

    Hi Mr. Odell. Can you recommend a resource if I want to learn to calculate a automotive wheel bearing and hub, the effects of circular runout on the overall hub runout ?

  • @connerg019
    @connerg019 Před 5 měsíci +1

    Holly fuck this guy is smart

  • @jojolicos3717
    @jojolicos3717 Před 2 lety +1

    thank you for this informative video.

    • @RDeanOdell
      @RDeanOdell  Před 2 lety

      You are so welcome! Thanks for watching.

  • @deathwrenchcustom
    @deathwrenchcustom Před 2 lety +1

    How is this beneficial over just using a unilateral tolerance such as 3.000 +.100 -.000 or a min/max dimension?

    • @RDeanOdell
      @RDeanOdell  Před 2 lety

      Hi,
      I use bilateral equal tolerances to save a step in calculation. If I use a unilateral dimension I would have to convert it into an bilateral equal tolerance to “fit” into the table to do the arithmetic.

  • @mfatih1068
    @mfatih1068 Před rokem +1

    Perfect!!

  • @OMR-ed4qs
    @OMR-ed4qs Před rokem

    what if you made it 3.08 instead of 3.09? The max will be 0.16 and min will be 0, so zero interference.

  • @josephtan7720
    @josephtan7720 Před 2 lety +1

    Simple and precise

  • @leak-proofengineeringindia2084

    Hello
    I'm using it for unilateral Tolerance but not working, plz suggest me the solution.
    Can I use it for bilateral unequal Tolerances?

    • @RDeanOdell
      @RDeanOdell  Před rokem

      Hi,
      Unilateral tolerances must be converted to bilateral equal tolerances to do the arithmetic in the stackup.

  • @raghavendrapalekar6739
    @raghavendrapalekar6739 Před 21 dnem

    Can you pls share one case study...

  • @user-to9me7xc8o
    @user-to9me7xc8o Před rokem +1

    Great

  • @Farshad-Parvin
    @Farshad-Parvin Před rokem +1

    Great video, would've been even better if it was in metric lol

  • @giridharpalvai7516
    @giridharpalvai7516 Před rokem

    Sir why we are using mmc and lmc in drawing

  • @barnardjoubert9849
    @barnardjoubert9849 Před 10 měsíci

    Cant watch with loud background music.

    • @fernandob4956
      @fernandob4956 Před 9 měsíci

      I agree. Very good instructor and lesson. But why the background music?