5.0L FORD HCI VS LS CAM-LET'S TALK TECH
Vložit
- čas přidán 8. 07. 2024
- WHAT HAPPENS WHEN YOU REPLACE THE STOCK HEADS, CAM AND INTAKE ON A 5.0l FORD-HOW MUCH POWER DO YOU GET? WHAT HAPPENS WHEN YOU REPLACE THE CAM ON A 5.3L LS? HOW MUCH POWER DO YOU GET? WHY ARE THEY THE SAME? LET'S TALK TECH
- Auta a dopravní prostředky
I have always thought the same thing. When the "5.0" came out in the Fox Mustang it basically saved the performance industry. I was there and the late 70's and it was horrible for the performance car world. Then this little H.O. hit the market and it had a 5 speed, limited slip and you could even with all it's whims and whatever that car turned around the industry. It was easy to work on, had some familiarity with a pushrod motor and the best it sounded freaking great.
I thought the true dual exhaust was pretty cool for the 1986 5.0 HO. It seemed more traditional than the F bodies single exhaust.
@@sbf_fox2434 Yes agreed. I was meaning the whole Fox Mustang platform which was not all true duals like you mentioned. Also I think the 351W firing order also help the sounds
.
I'm building a Australian 302 windsor at the moment I love my old small blocks
Yep.
If they design the engine much more efficient to begin with, they can then make it much smaller and still have the same amount of "required" power. But then since it's so much smaller in displacement it'll get much better fuel mileage and have cleaner exhaust emissions.
That's an example of using efficiency to get better fuel mileage.
But now if you put that same "efficient" design into a "larger" displacement engine, that would be an example of using efficiency to increase the engines power output.
Then if the whole engine is made of aluminum so that it weighs much less, that in an effect is another way of increasing it's efficiency, just in a slightly different way.
So if you can find an engine that combines all 3 of those factors, then you've really got a powerful and efficient engine, that should still get pretty good fuel mileage for the amount of power it can put out...
Bought a new set of flowmasters and the polished lx tips for one of my foxbodies a few months ago. Just a nastalgic sound.
They both go, you gotta know when to say when and when to say Whoa
Would I run a ford engine in a 5.0 mustang if I had one.
You're asking a cast iron boss block 4.125 Cleveland 427ci
Or run an aluminum LS..............
Can I use a life line on this question.... :)
Ive had a couple chances to put an ls in my 65 fastback. I just couldnt do it.
You should be ashamed for even considering that. 😂
Id rather do the surgery to put a 351w in it
No need to ls swap it. There are plenty of aftermarket heads available for small block Fords that make big power!!
@@randallmason9687 by the time you spend all the coin to throw the LS in, you could have a sbf platform making similar power and not have yet another gay LS swapped mustang.
I love the fox body’s and my brother in law is a fanatic about them he has a nice one like 504hp at the wheels but I’d run an ls all day everyday before I spend that money on another 5.0.
As long as you put that Chevy motor in a Chevy then cool keep them out of a ford unless you like transgender ckuhweer swaps 🏳️🌈🏳️⚧️
It wasn't the 5.0. The windsor platform is meh....but if you put it in a light enough car like a fox.....wel then it does ok.
I did see a video on here about low dollar mods to make a 4l60 handle 1000
not on this channel
No no I meant you tube there is a couple of bolt in parts for the 4l60 that nake it a powerhouse and capable of 1000.
Got a 5.0 with 11r heads 595/595 242/246 110° cam with a Holley sniper pro comp intake should make 400hp to the tires. Building a 408w stroker now cause I couldn’t do no ckuhweer ls swap I ain’t no “hOt rOdDeR”
4:53 I feel like the 806 headed LS1 I pulled from a wrecked B4C Camaro would need a bit more than a cam/ spring upgrade to get that +100hp gain on your dyno.
the ls1 cam is already more powerful than the LM7 cam-so it might be more difficult to get the 100 hp cam swap