What Can We Do About Gun Violence? | The Problem With Jon Stewart | Apple TV+
Vložit
- čas přidán 11. 11. 2021
- The Problem With Jon Stewart is now streaming on Apple TV+ theproblem.link/GunsEpisode
Bad guys have guns, good guys have guns- we all have guns! Guns in America aren't going away anytime soon. What we can do NOW is focus on harm reduction, and enforcing the existing laws that could save lives.
Watch the full first episode of The Problem With Jon Stewart for free, for a limited time, on Apple TV+.
Listen to The Problem With Jon Stewart podcast on Apple Podcasts, where available.
theproblem.link/GunsPodcast
Subscribe to The Problem with Jon Stewart’s CZcams channel:
theproblem.link/CZcams
Follow The Problem With Jon Stewart
Instagram:
theproblem.link/Insta
Twitter:
theproblem.link/Twitter
Follow Apple TV:
Instagram:
theproblem.link/AppleTVInsta
Facebook:
theproblem.link/AppleTVFacebook
Twitter:
theproblem.link/AppleTVTwitter
Giphy:
theproblem.link/AppleTVGiphy
Follow Apple TV+
Instagram:
theproblem.link/AppleTVPlusInsta
Apple TV+ is a streaming service with original stories from the most creative minds in TV and film. Watch now on the Apple TV app:
apple.co/AppleTVapp
#TheProblemWithJonStewart #Podcast #AppleTV - Komedie
When he made the OJ joke, Norm up there started laughing.
I thought the exact same thing, comedy right now is very quiet. I wouldn’t be surprised if that was an ode to him honestly.
😁
It's not the gun violence, it's the hypocrisy.
Omg remember when OJ tweeted something ending in “my mother was the only one to call me that name” and norm was like “…and lived to tell about it” ugh I miss him so much
@@hannah4087 hahahaha, g-d I miss him.
I feel the same way. I said to myself after sandy hook, “if people can overlook the slaughter of children and accuse their loved ones of being crisis actors then we are all lost.”
I think they got the guy that committed that.He's dead.
@@mikezaloudek4893 There are people who don't believe that.
@@ferox965 that should be fine. People are free to believe what they want.
@@mikezaloudek4893 Yes, they can believe anything, but spreading it around the world cost one dickhead a LOT...
Freedumb. It's not an absolute right.
Recently I was in a police station in Bangalore, India for my passport verification and I remember seeing the crime statistics on the wall. The #1 crime registered, you guessed it, Domestic violence! Thanks for pointing this out Jon, it's a global issue and a great place to start introspection on how we live our lives!
And that is in India where beating your spouse is socially accepted in not reported in large parts of the country.
@@azynkronit's not socially accepted.. which Era do you even live in lol.
When I worked for a youth organization, the saddest day I’ve ever had at work was going to the funeral of a mom with 3 kids in our program, who’s father shot and killed her over a rumor after they were separated. I watched a 7 year old climb on the coffin, screaming Mommy! Arming women is NOT the answer.
That's depressing.
God, that’s awful.
That's heartbreaking 💔. I hope those kids are ok now.
That just sound horrendous and heartbreaking. 😢
Please tell me how you arrived at we shouldn’t arm women?
"Are you taking OJ's side?!" I literally choked on my drink.
I had to read that twice.
And right after he said 'not his ORIGINAL weapon of choice'....
We also have to make sure that while enforcing these laws that law enforcement isn't exempt from these same laws.
Also criminals. We need to make sure that they arent exempt from this law. Oh wait...
Investigating crime report maps in any given city reveals that certain neighborhoods have disproportionate amounts of crime to an exponential degree. Perhaps having the military patrol high crime neighborhoods will bring peace to those neighborhoods seeing as how the police are ineffective at keeping crime at bay.
I've long lost patience with the failures of our nation to solve problems and approach all political angles and issues as a fixer of problems. We need clear and direct solutions, not waffling or weak handed approaches.
Ending the era of limp wristed politics and instead focusing on direct, hard, scientific solutions to problems should be the goal. Fundamentally I blame libertarianism and the libertarian mindset for most problems in the world. Anti-vaxxers are one thing, but abolish the police is another bad idea just as bad as anti-vaxxers. All of these toxic movements are destabilizing society to the point where cracks are starting to appear because people are promulgating bad ideas to an exponential degree, which results in deteriorating conditions... Rising crime, political destabilization, economic disorder, etc.
Cops have a bad reputation for committing domestic violence and other cops cover up for them.
@@ninjacats1647 So you propose full blown maximum efficiency big government authoritarianism then? From limp wristed to ruling with an iron fist. Yeah that would work great...Oh and blaming things on people who value civil liberties, personal responsibility, and small government was my favorite part. Hahahaha holy shit 🤣
Lol good luck. Cops are notoriously great at policing themselves. HAhahahahaHAhaHAhaHAhahaHA .... ahaha. ... ..
I have to say you are right Jon. My landlords late husband was an NYPD police officer in the 60s and '70s. And he told her domestic dispute calls were always the most dangerous calls you could ever get. That right there pretty much confirms what you said. I think it's time that we enforce those laws.
I wanted to be a cop when I was 10 years old but not because of carrying a gun; it was the the keys to the evidence room👍🏻... For better financial future you have #TDBank💳... 🌎💘💰
Best indictment of the whole "good guy with a gun solves bad guy with a gun" argument is the 2019 shooting in Dayton, Oh. A man opened fire on a crowded outdoor bar patio and cops responded quickly and had shot the guy 32 seconds after he opened fire. THIRTY TWO SECONDS between the first shot being fired and him being killed by the good guys with guns.
In that time he killed nine and injured 17 more. The absolute best case scenario for "good guy solves bad guy" is 9 dead and 17 injured.
The moment the bad guy with a gun pulls the trigger the good guy with a gun has failed. That phrase the NRA push is such bullshit.
cherry pick much
@@AnvilMAn603 Yes - it's cherry picked, I agree. OP (LazySleestack) has cherry picked the *best* case that has actually occurred, and shown just how much damage the shooter can achieve in that time. Pick some other cases and the good guy with a gun premise is shown to be even more useless. For example Buffalo (retired cop with handgun failed to stop shooter due to body armour and then lost his life in the process) and Uvalde (total sh!tshow failure by the cops, Border Patrol eventually defied orders to stay out and went in but 77/78 minutes had elapsed).
@@AnvilMAn603 20 "good guys with guns" stood in a hallway for an hour while the children in the class were shot to shreds. Need any more cherries?
@@dutube99 no you guys are doing a good enough job picking out the best case scenario for your scurrilous arguments
Having Jon Stewart back on TV is like a tall, cool drink after a day in the desert.
This issue is BullSh@3 czcams.com/video/ikTFpMc5NWQ/video.html
@@KennethGottfried your comment is a bullshit, naked attempt to drive people to view your own channel. Shouldve just stated your position here instead. Won't be clicking in it BTW.
He's the Moses of activist comedy.
(He'll love that comparison)
He's like January after a dry December
Yeah, Like He Said!!!! : ) Blessings All.
My dad was a cop for awhile in the early 1960’s and he hated domestic dispute calls. He said they were by far the scariest.
Domestic disputes are scary with or without firearms. I was taught as a teen to be very hesitant to intervene into a domestic dispute because the person being abuse can turn on you.
@@conchobar I was going to say the same. DV is the rare call where the victim will stab/shoot you.
@@conchobar Wait what. Why would they do that? o.o
We did domestic violence training to be a military police officer. Always the most sketch situations you’ll encounter as law enforcement.
@@captainzork6109 happens all the time.
Sorry Jon, if we kept domestic violence offenders from owning firearms then Police Officers would not be allowed to own firearms.
Jon is back in perfect Daily Show form. I missed this!!!!
I don't know how many more "disappointed in Humanity but still trying" Jon has left in him 😔
Especially when he had to fight so hard just to get 9/11 responders health care.
More like “disappointed in America since most of the problems on his show are uniquely American’s”
I think that's why he left the daily show for a rest... but I think we all knew he'd be back.... so glad...
@@takealeftatthelight5284 so fund pokice?
@@tuawacheteochitnotl3004 If police handle health care, then sure. But since they don't, your comment has no relevancy whatsoever.
I didn't realize how much I missed Jon. So glad he is back.
I realized.
I second that opinion
I don't always agree and sometimes I think he's just playing wrong but the important thing is at least John is a independent thinker and that's more important than being I think correct because we're human were fallible we're going to be wrong at times and we're going to disagree and we aren't going to necessarily know who's wrong or right this is an elementary school where the teacher can grade you and like yeah 2 + 2 is 4 and 3 + 3 is not 5 we don't always have a book that tells us the answers either so it's more important to have at least independent people think independently and you can be respectable and respect one another
So sad we still have such a desperate need for his voice on these topics.
Right?!?
Thanks for the information. Didn't know of the statistics between police and domestic violence calls. Really eye-opening. Really appreciative of your show, Jon.
And that's only the ones who were caught or willing to report it.
it isnt the guns...its just the type of power trip dudes that want to be a cop to begin with.
That's a very open ended theme he's brought up. Most domestic situations are not about firearms, but disputes, violence toward women(who should be armed)), and children who fall victim to... violent older boys.
Can't call them men. Most cops assume firearms are possible but Stewart paints that a bleak story each time to lean toward officer safety...which wasn't he hating on cops in 2020-21?
So JS hates guns and us who own them, but if he ONCE ever had a security detail, then he needs to be called out.
He is so self righteous, I'd love to know more of his personal (real) life outside of TV and this platform
As a domestic violence survivor, me having a firearm would have backfired on me. Why? Because my ex always went through my things and if I hid anything, I would have been in more “trouble”. Also, he was quicker than me- he would likely get to my gun before me. My daughters school gave me a phone for emergencies only. They told me not to tell him. Had I NOT told him, he would have broke the phone when he found it (not if) and beat me. I had to tell him. At least though he knew it was from the school and that they were suspicious of him, so he likely wouldn’t have done anything to it. Or would have relied on me telling the school it fell in the toilet or our daughter broke it.
@@echoface1670 the issue is that there are guns everywhere in millions of households. you pair gun presence with the possibility of domestic violence and you get fatal shootings. it's the same reason why americans living in a home with guns are significantly more likely to commit suicide than those who do not have access to a gun.
My God, he is such an intelligent, brutally sarcastic, and extremely fun person! Had no idea he is back!!!
I missed the intimacy that Jon Stewart brought to Comedy Central. He was always my favorite host, because he was sincere.
You might not agree but you always value his opinion. He's great. No one else on tv i could say the same.
His arguments are always valid.
And that's long gone, but everyone here is still oblivious to how he has changed. He got famous for standing up to the media, not for shilling misleading propaganda.
@@CHMichael He literally said compared the pro government lockdown side to the pro choice side, and said the people who dont want vaccine mandates are propaganda. He has become a shill because he cares more about making people laugh than being smart. This is the guy who talks mighty about liberal values then attacks his staff for partaking in the writers strike. This guy doesnt have a real spine, his most viral moment was mentioning Ron Paul but most people didnt actually watched his show, because he stopped reporting on Ron Paul damn quick himself, he only ever became famous because his comedy was more real than the news, but now he is becoming fake news without being funny. Apparently it was the comedy central writers that made him and Colbert funny, because these guys are complete shat.
Coming from someone who ACTUALLY watched him, unlike you and almost everyone here. every single night on CC for 10 years. Now I know Jon is an idiot, he isnt even a good comedian, he just had good writers.
@@davidjohnson8655 you should make a list of your accomplishments and compare them to his and also see how many people would agree with your opinion
@@davidjohnson8655 i dont get why you feel the need to exaggerate or invent how much you used to watch abd like jon stewart. No offence but i call bullshit on someone who watched jon Stewart everyday for 10 years (like you claim) and now subscribes to Charlie Kirk, OANN, Tim Pool, Project Veritas etc.
I dont get it, why lie about your previous viewing history? What did you gain by pretending?
I worked EMS for 30 years and I also had cops who are friends...we all agreed on this...the scariest calls are domestic violence...bar none...
And men who are found guilty of domestic violence who are forced into counseling, only about 2% make any progress...
So let's step back, and ask why men are growing up to become violent toward women? IMHO it starts with these words: "big boys don't cry". Forcing little boys to suppress their feelings rather than learning how to grow emotionally, just might be a problem...
Of course, if boys who have fathers who beat their mothers, and they grow up modeling that behavior, that is a problem too.
They say that violent video games don't play a role, but if it's okay in a game, why not in real life? Not everyone can draw that distinction.
@@ericjohnson6665 There are absolutely no scientific evidence that video games contribute to any sort of violence as far as I know, and people have tried so hard to make that connection for a very long time.
Lead water pipes couldn't have anything to do with this issue. (link between lead exposure and violence)
@@ericjohnson6665 Japan/Korea play video games by the millions and have virtually no gun violence: guess what? Not having guns helps to keep the statistics low. Stop defending the 2e. There is no viable defense.
@@ericjohnson6665 Absolutely agree that we need to allow boys and men the full range of feelings. When you hear feminists use the term "toxic masculinity" this is what they are referring to. As well as finding ways to interrupt the cycle, as you said. On a cultural level, it's not just video games but all media glorifies violence. How do we tackle that?
0:35 “Every kill begins with ‘k’ “😂
Jon we need you to keep pointing out the absurdities of our world. You have more of an impact than you can realize.
Not the world. Just USA.
@@tracim3080his world is the USA.
jon saying i've really missed that warms my heart
THANK YOU JON STEWART. I am a survivor of DV and I feel like I’ve been screaming this into oblivion and no one seems to understand that if we took DV as the serious crime it is we could be preventing mass violence, LE violence, serial killings, etc. DV is our first contact and our opportunity to intervene. Cops can predict who are most likely to shoot them and it is DV calls. I have a family negotiator in LE and every time he is called out I know it could have been prevented. Our DV laws are 40 years old and need an update ASAP.
Lol it is taken seriously and you loose your gun rights as a result.
@@johnlast8578 Like John said, we have the laws for it just no enforcement.
Here in Louisiana cops arrested me for being beat up and calling them. I got the message, never called them again.
@@teresathayn5170
Lol no they arrested you to protect you, as you were probably acting irrational.
@@johnlast8578 if you meant what you said here you are part of the problem. Shaming the victim is abominable.
Domestic violence not only involves a spouse but the children are also traumatized. DV perpetuates when ignored or tolerated. We should be doing everything to stop this abuse and stop all the killing!
That was BRUTAL. Never have I ever heard this prospective before. This changes everything.
It changes nothing. He addresses nothing of importance. Black on Black violence and Black on White violence. That "gun" violence DWARFS the minuscule numbers of school shootings. How many non whites were murdered in Chicago last month? By whom? How about Philly? Buy hey, you can live in your bubble.
The king of talk shows is back, and he's pissed
Well, there's so much to be pissed off about!
It’s just that all the other late night hosts are terrible. They just suck.
@@fessick2848 they don't suck, you just don't like them
@@redakdal fair
I like how he zeroes in on a very specific way to reduce violence significantly rather than targeting guns broadly.
and completely takes away any counter argument so there is basically no reason at all not to act on it
After years of calling for bans on guns and severe restrictions.
@@pjetrs but it is already being enforced today. The church shooter in Texas was barred from owning a gun from a domestic violence record while in the military but someone screwed up and didn’t transfer that record to the system that does back ground checks. Regardless background checks which are needed for all gun purchase except for individuals selling their guns require a back ground check and in most states it is illegal to sell a gun privately to a felon.
@@paulkearney7594 it's being enforced.. but oh wait somebody screwed up?
Someone screwed up..
Someone screwed up..
Someone.. screwed.. up..
An excuse as old as time.
Nothing will change. Nothing will happen. You know why. And it'll never change. Someone screwed up..
@@paulkearney7594 It's federally illegal to sell a firearm to a felon, privately or otherwise. As is buying a firearm for another person that is barred from owning one.
I used to work in a domestic violence therapy clinic and a common response to why did your husband beat you was that their football team had lost.
In my state if you get accused of domestic violence, they take your guns until you either have a hearing or the charges are drop.
Parts of Australia are really wishing that they hadn't given up their guns right now
As someone who works in the DV field, thank you so much for highlighting this issue. In my state of Georgia, sadly, it is often a non-starter even with LE officers who are allies and work with DV advocates and organizations. It is so infuriating and heartbreaking at the same time. Courts also have a hard time disarming DV perpetrators who are making a living with a firearm (police officers, military, private security), for fear they will not be able to "make a living."
I rarely look at YT comments but I scrolled down to see if anyone would mention the pesky problem with DV that police officers have themselves.
Working in the DV field must be taxing mentally. Speaking as a former Marine, DV, is a kiss of death, to a career. All Marines are rifleman, hence, DV disqualifies you for further duty. Off base, the Marine, faces double jeopardy. We do our best to enforce DV. Yes, the military has a higher rate then civilians. We offer counseling for both, it's up to the Marine to control him/her self. If not, consequences will follow. "Semper Fi"
Here in Colorado even if you are charged with anything DV, your guns are taken away. Seems pretty straight forward to me. Not sure why other states cannot get onboard with that. I support the right to have guns in the hands of the right people, but people who commit violent crimes, even while only charged, should not have access to guns. Honestly after serving in the military and having grown up around guns and hunters, it perplexes me why people who do purchase guns do not have mandatory training and safety awareness. If there is one thing that should have safety over done it is gun ownership. There should be a mandatory two week training done for anyone buying a gun. That is less then the amount i had prior to even going into the military.
@Custos Vitiosus Do you drive a vehicle? You had to have training, a medical exam and pass a test showing competency to be licensed! This is the minimum that should be required for guns!
@Custos Vitiosus so if you read a history book or two, you would know the right to bare arms being about owning a personal gun was essentially invented by the NRA in the late 20th century. One conservative supreme Court justice called it "the greatest swindle of the American people to date"
Thank you for this John + team. This kind of legislation actually has a chance to pass and would do so much to help the situation.
It already is the law and you don’t enforce it. You suck.
With all that is wrong with the world today ... having Jon back makes some of it just 'alittle bit' better. Thank you Jon. We've missed you !
I wanted to be a cop when I was 10 years old but not because of carrying a gun; it was the the keys to the evidence room👍🏻... For better financial future you have #TDBank💳... 🌎💘💰
We've missed you so much, Jon.
czcams.com/video/xiNAdtaZ9AA/video.html
Jon is doing O.J. jokes in a way Norm would have appreciated.
The more I hear about this OJ guy, the less I think he should have a gun.
In Walnut Creek California anyone who turns in his gun can now get you free therapy. And anyone who does not turn in his gun can get free anything. -Norm
O.J. jokes remind me of that tragedy...
Nah. If Norm did an OJ,joke it would have involved hookers.
RIP Norm
Jon Stewart for president! ❤
Amen Jon, Amen!
6:51 - A refrain I often hear from gun owners (a group of which I too am a member) is that we don't need new laws, we just need to enforce the ones we already have. If this law isn't being enforced somewhere than enforce it.
I mean, it's not easy to prevent someone from loaning their gun to someone for target practise or because they feel threatened by someone. The problem is that 99.9% of gun violence already is illegal, but Jon doesnt have his a team writers with him so he sounds like a shill. You guys must all still be Colbert fans too, because this show is making a mockery of Jon's legacy as a moderate.
The problem with this argument is 1) if they're not following tbe current ones, they won't follow the new ones. 2) it's not just the law that needs changed. You can't just change the law and expect people to just roll with it, you gotta change the mindset first, because i got some bad news, it does in fact need changed.
@@davidjohnson8655 jon was never moderate, not in the way moderation is typically used in context of US politics
@@xamislimelight8965 Yeah, without changing the culture and the attitudes there will be no reductiin in gun violence. I'm a gun owner and I grew out of the "gubbermint and bad guys is out to git me" a loooooong time ago.
@@davidjohnson8655 John was never a moderate. He was just always reasonable. The right has swung so far to the right… you’re brushing up against fascism. The entire political spectrum in the US has moved to the right, sadly. Progress is good. Too bad conservatives don’t understand this.
Jon Stewart is sounding, and looking, more like George Carlin every day! I love it :)
@P Mar Everyone dies
Jon is great, but I say Chappel is the next George Carlin, Jon is the next George Burns.
Jon is the only guy that cuts the crap and always to the point. He never walks around the bush like other hosts
This video was 6 months ago, and it feels it was released days ago. WTF
The domestic violence argument is something even my pro second amendment family is pretty in support of. If you have a history of multiple domestic violence complaints and convictions then it should be far more difficult, if not outright banned for you to have a gun. The issue is the percentage of these domestic violence situations where the culprit already can't own a gun for prior felonies and still has one. Having a gun illegally during the commission of crime should be an automatic 15 year sentence.
A "complaint"? That's pretty slippery
I can bet you people would cry false accusations from women about banning domestic abuse offenders from having guns.
Yeah they need to greatly increase the penalty for having a gun illegaly. Is there anything else we can do to reduce the amount of gun violence from folks with a history of DV?
@HunterBidensCrackPipe this is true. I've seen false accusations of DV on pro athletes but, that is a small percentage to be fair
@@mirawenya they did. fucking ignore the horses asses!
Incidentally, a disproportionate amount of police officers beat their intimate partner...
over 40%...
And there's the rub.
@doof goobins there is no justification for abuse. It's a personal choice.
@@carissahowell That is a simplistic response. Many of these cops have emotional problems that go untreated because of a culture not willing to acknowledge weakness or vulnerability. The person being abused is suffering at the hands of someone who is also likely suffering. You want to solve one, solve the other.
@The Insult Pigeon That is also a ridiculous and statistically untrue response from a either an obvious troll or another person with simplistic responses.
I’m at work and left my gun at home. Sure hope nothing happens while I’m gone.
Anyone else here after Texas elementary school shooting?
The solution is self-imposed, weapons should be distributed to the children in schools. Had the children been armed they could have resisted the attacker and this would not have happened. Better not give the NRA any ideas. Something is rotten in the state of Denmark. American! I meant American.
No one does it like you Mr. Stewart. You are s true gem, and I missed your commentary and humor.
Aside from how informative this was, I love how Mr. Stewart not only shows the negative crowd reaction, but works with it to make them laugh. God-tier confidence and improvisation. I’m happy again.
you dont really believe that was ad-libbed do you?
Can be hopeful for an honest audience, the chaos could be entertaining.
He's putting out propaganda. He's not informing you of anything you already don't "know" or want to believe.
gOD is one tier below Jon.
Informative, yes, but generally incorrect regarding the domestic violence angle. You need a reason to restrict someone from having a gun which means the suspect would have had to have already been convicted of a DV crime. You cant just look at a person who has committed a crime and say "That person shouldnt have had a gun". That's hindsight.
Norm Macdonald is smiling down from heaven listening to that OJ joke
Love this! Thank you!
This Jon Stewart guy is pretty good! He’s got a future in this game
nice to see a young whippersnapper making a name for himself
I don’t think he’ll last. I mean, he’s no Craig Kilborn.
Too bad he's totally wrong on this one and used fake arguments and half truths to prove his points.
@@Skenderbeuismyhero So are you siding with domestic violence perpetrators?
@@BaiginLong Haha, when did I say that? It's already illegal to own a firearm if you have any domestic abuse felonies or misdemeanors. It's misleading to suggest that it isn't illegal like he does throughout this video. The people who want to take guns away are also the ones that have been pushing for and making bail "reforms" and letting out violent criminals over and over. Law makers and judges are undermining the criminal justice system and new laws for things that are already illegal won't change anything. Also the chart they showed for a second was extremely misleading. Jon says that studies show that more guns means more deaths but that chart specifically shows gun deaths. Switzerland is much higher on the chart than the UK even though they have 1/4th the murders that the UK has and the overall murder rate of the UK is much closer to the US than this chart shows. Just another example of people using statistics out of context to prove their improvable points.
Excellent conversation Jon Stewart, I was in 2 abusive relationships and both men had guns, it's amazing I'm alive today. ✌️Thank you Jon.
@Adam Cohen Is your argument that you are siding with murdering people?
did you press charges for their abuses to help protect other women in the future?
Jon Stewart for President 🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸
2:12 - somewhere out there, Norm Macdonald is laughing at that OJ joke
The world has been suffering a severe Jon Stewart shortage in recent years, thank god thats finally being remedied.
He was really good at what he did when he did it back in the day. Now it is a crowded field with the people he developed to do what he did that are doing it now.
I missed Jon so much. So glad he's back.
I'm going to get Apple TV just for John Stewart!!!
I woulda died if the diamond commercial said "and just in case she says no .." 😂
37 years ago today my father shot to death my mother and one of her friends, thinking he was her lover. Except his wife and kids were there to witness it and beg for their lives. 37 years ago, and the issue of domestic violence and gun violence are still seemingly impossible to address in any meaningful way. As always, Jon Stewart hits this one out of the park. 🧡
Imagine if his wife or kids had a firearm to protect themselves, how things could be different
(I hope you were joking,@@yohanthegr8959) Nothing brings a family closer than a shootout. All that would be needed is Doom music in the background.
@@BrianHolmes Sadly, I was being serious. How many cases do we hear about home invasions that end when the mother or teenager are able to access a firearm and defend themselves? You cannot be shown 1 singular statistic without viewing all of the statistics surrounding Domestic Violence cases where one party protected their lives with one. More importantly, this entire debate is disenfranchised to begin with. To make a case that domestic violence perpetrators wouldn’t have been able to kill if they didn’t have a firearm, is suggestive that they were legally allowed to have one to begin with. Criminals don’t care about laws. I’m tempted to believe criminals don’t even care about the punishments anymore, because of (in my opinion) the lack of public display and severity. We need common sense reform, and the issue is not the firearm.
Edit: let’s be clear, personally, I would never wish for a shootout. I pray I never have to use my firearm in self defense. But good people who carry protection, are not the ones making those decisions. Or do you believe they are?
@@yohanthegr8959 it would be easier to just NOT HAVE GUNS to begin with. You apparently didn’t get the message of the video: it’s impossible to distinguish the good from the bad guy. What did Australia do after such a shoot out? The banned guns altogether and lived happily ever after.
@@yohanthegr8959 There are laws that aren't enforced and there are mental health issues never addressed in this country. To say that the best course of action is more weapons is ludicrous to a rational mind. In my opinion the amount of weapons in our hands is untenable, what is necessary now is thorough education on the safe handling of these by society. Hell, we don't even have the basic training for actors when it comes to firearms and you want to arm family members in the name of security? Full out authoritarian legislation won't stop this nor will more unenforced laws.
As a gun owner, wasn’t sure where you would go with this… I like it and fully support it.
Why do you own a gun?
@@MartijnHover ...short answer, protection. Long answer is I have children, friends and family that depend on me and need me alive to do that. If someone wants to stop me from being alive, I have to object to that.
@@SGxShadow are you in danger? Statistically, having a gun in the house puts your family at a huge increase for being shot.
@@nemowindsor8724 Statistically, by the time you realize you’re in danger it’s too late to go out and purchase a firearm.
@@SGxShadow It's usually informed by instinct rather than logic, in the same way we tend to be fearful of planes even though cars are far more dangerous. Gun ownership psychology is usually informed by a location/environment where one doesn't feel safe and thus the gun provides a sense of being secure. Over time we have seen this just isn't true, but it's just how the brain works (and thus why people shouldn't have guns; I can attest to the fact that my fears and paranoias get the best of me, and I can end up doing some irrational things, and hell for all we know the op lives in an area where crime is high, so at the very least I can empathize with the impulse to buy what you think is protection). We aren't rational actors, unfortunately, that's why we need to look out for each other. The self is unreliable. (If op sees this, sorry if it feels I'm assuming a lot about you. To make it clear, this isn't a judgement. This is data informed, I don't think it's healthy to assert moral authority over others when you can't possibly know their situation; your reasons are likely understandable, but the research is in. I'm sorry you feel so unsafe that you believe a gun is necessary, that's a sign we are failing as a society to ensure the comfort of each other, truly I am sorry)
(Here's some interesting facts on the psychology of Gun Ownership by the by: www.theguardian.com/science/brain-flapping/2015/oct/07/gun-demanding-control-firearms-psychology)
I missed you Jon. So glad you are back.
I would love to see Jon debate Colion Noir
Jon Stewart and his writing team are the definitive Edu-tainment News-Comedy team. Perfect balance of a sound, well reasoned argument about an important social issue, without spinning every systemic cultural problem into a catastrophe, and keeping on topic with relevant humor throughout the segment, rather than detouring into absurdist nonsense. Just great stuff.
More people need to appreciate just how clear the leading indicators for violent outbursts are. Domestic Violence is a signal that the individual and family culture views violence as a normal form of social interaction, and a means to an end. And as always, theres an underlying socio-economic problem at the heart of domestic violence. "Lock them up" and "take their guns" are important measures for the end of the process flow, but the real change is made upstream, identifying why these young men and women are growing in environments that normalize violence and abuse.
Really wish it wasn't on Apple TV. No matter how many things they put out that I really wanna see I refuse to get it.
Glad at least some of it is being put on CZcams!
"go f*** yourself". Yeah amazing sound argument.
Almost as good as just being able to take guns away from domestic abusers, before theyre domestic abusers. And its not like domestic abuse victimes are killed by knives, blunt weapons, the abusers hands. nope. take the guns away and abusers will stop being abusers. Johns got aol the answers.
Don't even get me started on him basing "who is a good guy" on who some nut job celebrities say is a good guy. At this point any celebrity thats claimed to he a good guy should be treated with suspicion. Yet its people like jon And these garbage "late night comedians" who push this idea that celebrities are good people.
Do I sense the need for a form of piracy that doesn't require guns?
"And I don't wanna be judgy, but I think it's gotten absurd."
(plays commercial about Lee Ann's Fine Jewelry giving away a gun with a jewelry purchase)
🎵 "Every 'kill' begins with K" 🎵
I figured it was getting absurd when I was watching _The Tonight Show_ (back in the days when it was still hosted by Jay Leno) and he said, "This is why the rest of the world thinks we're nuts, ladies and gentlemen," and showed us an ad from a local paper with an infant (quite literally an infant) holding a revolver across his lap with the print around it saying, "From our family, to yours."
My local gun nut store has billboards every Christmas showing “pretty” AR15’s s as ultimate Christmas gifts.
lemme guess, the picture was taken in a trailer home.
@@CharlesClemens Nothing says Christmas like superior firepower.
We don't think you're nuts. That boat has sailed. On this subject we know!
If you understand what the gun in ads represents, you wouldn't be so offended by it.
It's literally why you have the best life one could have ever hoped for since...........man first walked this earth.
But you've been made to believe the opposite...
It's not your fault. The bad in this world always go after the good...
It makes total sense. If DV offenders are willing to harm the people closest to them, why would they have any respect for the rest of us?
Love, love, love John. We all know someone who has a gun, who shouldn't. We all know that guy....
That'd be half of South Chicago where guns are totally banned.
I'm a certified gun nut and I so much appreciate Jon Stewarts take on this. It's a real solution we can get behind and he's not talking condescendingly to gun owners or arrogantly swinging around his ignorance of firearms. Seriously great to have him back.
Bot speak.
I think you mean CONDESCENDINGLY...condicentantly isn't a word...
@@Penguin_of_Death chill out
how can u tell a bad guy from a good guy? seems pretty easy to me? if they are pointing a gun at you or shooting unarmed people?
Jon Stewert is so good. Holy fucking shit.
I agree. But good gracious… he doesn’t have to use all this conflation!!! He has an argument without the cheap media tricks and oversimplified points. The last 2 minutes or so, was all that was needed.
@@LibertyGoose If two minutes is all that was needed there wouldn't be an issue. Your criticism is noted.
Oh noooo. 12 deaths per 100k vs 1 death per 100k. How terribly worse we have it here. I don’t like the the NRA, their logic is also… but this is just lazy statistics.
This issue is BullSh@3 czcams.com/video/ikTFpMc5NWQ/video.html
I was going to comment the same thing and knew there'd be someone who had the same gutteral reaction. SO. GOOD.
Thank you!
Thank you, Jon.
Love this. It's very fact based and also proposes a solution. I'm an extremely pro 2A person but I can't argue with this logic. Yeah let's crack down on those people
I'm a gun owner but possibly less gung ho about the second amendment.
What are your thoughts on a real gun registration and ghost guns?
Many "extremely pro 2nd amendment" people are also strongly against the registration of guns and many are very pro ghost guns.
I ask because if I were to say we shouldn't have to register guns because they are a right and I should be allowed to manufacture my own guns without having to then register them, how would we implement these laws at all?
I could have one registered gun and 5 ghost guns. The cops show up because I'm a domestic abuser and take the one gun on my list and I still have 5.
So how do we address those inconsistent views?
Did you know, a lot of judges deciding dv cases (injunctions/restraining orders) think that abusers have a right to their guns despite believing abuse occurred. If you're an attorney before such judges, bring the fed rules with you to help remind the judge. It works (usually).
That might be a possible way around the underlying problem, which is that state and local cops don't have to enforce the Gun Control Act of 1968 -- which is the federal law that says DV offenders may not buy or own guns -- because it is not written into the Constitution itself. It's thus their 10th Amendment right to refuse to enforce it. But yes, if a local judge tells them to, then that might be a different story, since they were ordered by the local court.
Still, without state and local laws that say the same thing as the federal law, you're going to have lots of instances where local cops and/or judges don't want to take a DV offender's guns, and, since the 10th Amendment says they don't have to anyway, they may not do it, even when asked. Then, it will be voluntary for the offender to give up his guns, which is of course just another way of saying that he won't have to.
He can likely also get a new gun through a private sale or a straw purchaser, even though if he tries to get one at a store, the NICS check will tell the dealer -- who is licensed through the ATF, and thus has federal (not local) law enforcement looking over his shoulder -- not to sell to him. Thus, the commercial dealer is the only likely barrier to the DV offender who wants to get a gun, and there are multiple ways around him.
@@archerj.maggott1372 I can only provide an example for Florida, and the law for dv says if an dv injunction is granted against you, you cannot be in possession of your guns. Some judges like to say it's not a must but a suggestion of the max that can be ordered against the abuser, but it's not. And when you remind them that it is not just a local state law but federal, they are more inclined to follow the law in fear of being appealed.
You still have some judges who don't care and believe the survivor doesn't have the means to pay for an appeal.
Doesn't hurt to be prepared at all levels, especially if you want to preserve the record for appeal.
You are right, injunctions do little to protect the abused when law enforcement will not do their part in enforcing it. A lot of victims don't even know how to use the order to protect them selves. Lots of education is lacking in this area and you need all boots on the ground involved to find the holes and solutions for the holes.
Gun control...yeah well we know that's always been a problem and not enough is ever done to fix it.
John Stewart for President!
Best video I've ever seen on the subject. Bravo, Jon
YES! John is back with his usual critique of media using tv clips. So insightful and enganging. I have missed it.
As someone who is very pro gun, I'm totally onboard with this.
Thank you!
ditto
right there with you
All gun laws are unconstitutional. All of them. Don't like it? Get out of my country.
@@pwrserge83 Majority of people here want to change the laws. Don’t like it? Get out of our country.
@@odysseus9176 the constitution isn’t up for a vote commie. The “majority” can sit on it and rotate.
Owned a firearm for twenty years. Never pointed it at anyone.
The Terror watchlist doesn't require any type of actual evidence to be placed upon it. That would be a violation of due process not just the second amendment.
Jon at his best pointing out the BS and Hypocrisy. A brilliantly analytical mind, and a compassionate human.
Thank you, Jon.
I'm not sure if he's that great of an analytical mind, more a funny guy who's done some good things for people who were ignored by the govt.
He isn't good at research. He wanted to see an assault weapons ban yet the federal ban was let to expire because of governmental study stating it did not accomplish what the law was outlined to accomplish and therefore was allowed to expire on the grounds of being ineffective. Why someone would support a bill already proven in effective at the time it was allowed to expire is beyond me.
Really? like Obama and Eric Holder and "Fast and Furious?
@@1911GreaterThanALLDo you support domestic violence offenders owning guns? Yes or no?
@@thethirdman225 What does that have to do with ineffective federal assault weapons ban?
yeah Jon. Everything is NOT fine. Thank you for using your voice to land a spotlight on domestic violence - the giant elephant in the room borne primarily from child abuse and at the heart of so much death and loss in our country. We need resources, prevention education, and a clear EFFECTIVE path to safety & security for victims. We're losing, women are losing, kids are losing - and men are losing too. The resulting damage just feeds the cycle.
Not losing enough the damn population keeps skyrocketing
@@firefly9838 yes, who could forget that age old hypocritical problem of being pro-life and pro-guns. John was not sarcastic about that fact that this problem is killing women, children and cops. Is that the part of the over-population your talking about? If it is gtfo!
@@nicklang7670 I’m saying who cares if people die. Not our problem.
Preach Sister!!!! Web Of Causation, Is The Most Nessessary Tool, To Solve This "Plage" Of Domestic Violence. In Every Oppressed Society, We Have Lateral Violence. The Supremist Policies Must Cease And Desist. Whoever Is Not Afforded, Quality Education ( Critical Thinking) Is The Slave Wages Labor Force. With A Boot On The Back Of The Neck. Policy Makers Are In Their Ivory Towers, Telling Folks To Pull Themselves Up By Their Boot Straps... And They Have No Boots. The Mentality IS... You Are Poor, Because You And Yours, Have Done That To Yourselves. And The Shame That Comes With Poverty IS, Well... Demoralizing. It Is Much Harder To Make Healthy Choices And Disisions, Whilst Living In Shame. Not Being Able To Provide, Through No Fault Of One's Own. A Broken Child Cannot Become A Healthy Adult, Without Alot Of Work. Societies Are Barely Addressing This Fact. Blessings To You And Yours. : )
@@candyrosefreeman7232 poverty is NOT a character flaw. With you all the way.
The eye roll when everyone cringed at the OJ knife joke. 😂
Damn. THANK YOU.
First of all, that Lifetime joke was *chef’s kiss*. Second of all, I am as pro 2nd amendment as anyone and I completely agree with Mr. Stewart’s assertion. More gun laws mean nothing if we aren’t willing to enforce the laws we already have on the books against people like domestic abusers.
Watch your step my friend. The slope is slippery today
@@KIDKorRupt24 As a history teacher, I completely understand. Trust me. But “enforce laws that are already on the books” is perfectly reasonable in my eyes
This is the reason such laws can't be enforced. A lot of domestic abusers are either in law enforcement or former armed forces. I thought Jon would touch on that when he mentioned the danger towards law enforcement.
@@MBustos828 It's actually the usual NRA blathering about being against tougher gun laws... "We don't need any more gun laws, enforce the laws on the books", and then when they are, the NRA pisses and moans about "infringements on our Second Amendment rights"
The reason the current gun laws aren't enforced is simple. They don't deter criminal behavior. Stricter, more restrictive gun laws don't affect the criminals' behavior, only the law abiding gun owners, which is exactly the aim of gun control proponents.
This seems to me like the least controversial take on gun control ever while also doing serious harm reduction if implemented. Damn, he's good.
Yep. A novel concept that doesn't remove the rights of law abiding citizens. Which is probably why it won't ever get any traction.
It would certainly be better than the "red flag" stuff, which seems to be a bunch of "he said / she said" with no proof required.
@Shinshocks it would have to be on conviction. Otherwise there's no due process, which is a violation of your basic human rights.
He basically said: Enforce the laws already on the book. That what gun owners have been saying all along.
@@stimproid pretty much. Many States have laws related to Domestic Abuse being a felony, and Federal laws prohibit gun ownership if convicted of a felony or some domestic violence misdemeanors.
So... Yeah. Enforce the laws that are already there.
He’s a National Treasure.
One of the biggest problems is that we run around saying we need to solve this kind of violence or that kind of violence, like there is some kind of violence that is OK. We need to understand that violence is not a solution period
Love this man!
Don't know where ya been the past few years but, I'm glad your back Jon.
He's been fighting for 9/11 first responders
He was working on his wife's animal rescue farm. But now he's back and better than ever!
he said he was retiring but he has been busy. he did the independent film and as the other people mention he has been quite active. glad to have him back though.
I know, he's been involved in the veterans community and has done lots of awesome things, I just ment it's good to see him doing his thing more often again is all.
I'm so glad John Stewart is back. I don't agree with all of his politics but at least we are getting an authentic version of his opinion rather than some twisted partisan BS. It's tied to logical conclusions. Got to say he's a good dude. Thank you for coming back.
Are you saying we need to get him a gun?
@@tvanbroekhoven yes
Jon you're the best brother! ❤
Perhaps a Law requiring Mental evaluations before allowing anyone to own one.
Yeah, you can't do that. People won't submit themselves to government shrinks which are going to deny as many people as possible.
As a gun owner, this was a more thoughtful segment than I was prepared for.
There’s hope!!
Most liberals are actually very rational about guns. There are very few who advocate for a total ban on firearms and those very few people don't understand how impossible that would be in this country. It's okay to staunchly fight gun violence and still be an owner. I'm an Army veteran and fully support ownership, though I also think people should have mandatory training that is provided by the government and held to a very high standard because you shouldn't have to pay for a Constitutional right. I also think existing laws need to be enforced, especially regarding domestic violence.
@@wiltarthebarbarian1988 Yeah, because no woman has ever lied to a judge about "domestic violence"... ever... Here's an idea... quit propping up feminazis who got what they deserved.
I also am a responsible owner of several firearms and I do agree with Jon on this issue.
As a former law enforcement officer I believe we do not need more gun laws but simply need to enforce the ones we have.
I do however think gun owners should be required to receive proper gun safety training and obtain a permit to purchase a firearm.
My wife and I both obtained our CCW permits even though she does not carry one I believed it important for her to have it.
I am uncomfortable with people who should not be allowed to have a firearm, such as a convicted felon, purchase one from an individual.
I personally would not sell a firearm to anyone who did not have a permit to carry one since a felon cannot obtain a permit.
I know people go crazy over the constitutional carry idea but we need to be practical.
Firearms are fine in the proper hands and I know that no law will prevent criminals from getting them but we could make it a little more difficult.
@@931tow I know people are crazy over constitutional voting, but we need to be practical, voting is fine in responsible “non-diverse” hands. That sound ok to you commie?
That ending made me spit out some cabbage I was munching on.
Given recent events in my home state of Texas: I have zero confidence that this problem will be solved. Also, don't we already have a lot of "good guys with guns?" Like, the police? We can't trust many of them, either.
“Good guys” stop active shooter incidents 34.4% of the time.
@@theconstitutionalcupheadCitation or it didn't happen.
We could try thoughts and prayers. They've worked well with other issues.
It's kind of scary when you couple this information with the domestic abuse statistics within the police force.
Occupations of top 3 DV perps - police, military and prison guards. Go figure - all gun related work.
I'm in Texas. An Auto-Zone employee shot a surly customer after the customer displayed his "Constitutional Carry" pistol.
Showdowns at the Auto Parts Corral... JFC.
(Where'd Jon get that grey shirt?)
I've been looking into this story. I have yet to find a single source saying that an actual weapon was produced by the victim, only that he lead the gunman (the autozone employee) on to believe he may have a weapon based on how he may have reached, drawn or patted himself in some fashion. I'm finding lots of variations of the same story but they all sound similar and all fail to mention an actual weapon was flashed by the victim.
The only point in my post/reply is that a very important detail in the original post (the brandishing of a weapon) cannot be confirmed, perhaps someone else can point to another source?
@@dirtydish6642 CZcams deleted my reply.
To repeat: Just 2 dudes flexing about shooting until one got shot.
And I tried to get a battery tested at that auto parts chain and they pulled a knife on me. If not for my trusty bullwhip, I'd have been gutted.
(See if that gets immediately deleted)
Sometimes Jon knocks it out of the park when it comes to sensibility. This one is a grand slam. Well done.
Omg!! Seriously LOL at the Oj jokes!! Spot on Jon!
I miss Stewart and his way of discussing his opinions. I disagree with almost all his political point of views, but he's my preferred source to hear opinions opposing to mine. Talking to me and presenting information is how you can convince me, not labeling me as something I'm not and talking over me.
If you disagree with almost all of his political point of views you are not only letting him convince you, but continously listening to him despite this makes you as reasonable as Mr. NRA! Think about it ...
You realize hes (stewart) is making fun of you (you) if you agree with the jackasses he snips into his bits.
If youre not smart enough to realize.... well then... thanks for coming out of your echo chamber and not learning a damned thing.
Wow, the dude praises John's ability to present his points with humor in a way that elicits thoughts and rethinking your position and the replies in the thread miss the point completely and attack the OP for having different opinions and still watching John. Fucking hell.
@@JoeWolsing I hear you, but I'm still willing to listen. I need to hear it from someone or I'll be in a bubble, and there's not many reasonable people to listen to anymore.
@@JoeWolsing You make absolutely no sense. If he considers Jon his preferred source to hear opinions opposing to his, that means Jon didn't convince him of anything. He has an open mind, hears multiple opinions to an issue and decides for himself, instead of some on the left and almost all on the right whose minds are already made up because they listened to only one view.
So glad Jon Stewart is back!
The good guy is the one not shooting unarmed people in let’s say a mall. The good guy is typically not going to yell his set and then randomly fire into a crowd or a home. A good guy with a gun would typically be the one firing at those people.
To stop a bad guy with a gun it takes a good girl with a gun 😂