Mazda CX-30 - What Took So Long? (ENG) - Test Drive and Review
Vložit
- čas přidán 22. 08. 2024
- Mazda CX-30 is the long-awaited compact crossover, which the Japanese manufacturer probably didn't even plan on making. It rides on the same platform, as the new Mazda3, and slots between the CX-3 B-crossover and the Toyota RAV4 rivalling CX-5. Mazda CX-30 goes after competitors like the Toyota C-HR, Peugeot 3008 or Volkswagen Tiguan.
Starting price: 24 290 euro
As tested: ~33 000 euro
Also watch:
Mazda3 • Mazda3 2019 - New Prem...
Mazda CX-3 • Mazda CX-3 (ENG) - Tes...
Mazda CX-5 • Mazda CX-5 2017 (ENG) ...
Mazda CX-9 • (ENG) Mazda CX-9 2015 ...
Toyota C-HR • Toyota C-HR (ENG) - Te...
Toyota RAV4 • 2019 Toyota RAV4 Hybri...
Citroen C5 Aircross • Citroen C5 Aircross - ...
Peugeot 3008 • 2017 Peugeot 3008 (ENG...
Honda CR-V • 2019 Honda CR-V (ENG) ...
Volkswagen Tiguan • Volkswagen Tiguan 2016...
Volkswagen T-Roc • Volkswagen T-Roc (ENG)...
Volkswagen T-Cross • Volkswagen T-Cross - S...
Follow me:
www.wieruszews...
/ marekdrives
/ mwieruszewski
/ marek_drives
#MarekDrives #Mazda #MazdaCX30
Thanks for watching Marek Drives reviews. If you liked it, here are several other channels you may enjoy: Autophorie, Autogefühl, Bob Flavin, Carfection, Doug DeMuro, Driven Car Reviews, Fully Charged, TheSmokingTire, TheStraightPipes, VINwiki. - Auta a dopravní prostředky
Thank you for reviewing the "base" engine and not the out of reach premium variant that most reviewers get.
I think people prefer SUVs to hatchbacks not only because they're trendy now but for some practical reasons as well. Most people don't buy cars for racing but to go from one place to another, like going to work, take the children to school, shopping, holidays... And they want the cars to be comfortable, roomy, and safe. And if possible easy to drive around. Compact SUVs are all that. That's why they're so successful. In my humble opinion. Thanks,for showing, Marek.
Easier ingress/egress, and a slightly higher riding height that gives you better visibility compared to the hatch it is based on. Usually more boot space and you can fit in taller objects. The 3 hatchback's C-pillars doesn't help rear visibility, and makes the rear passenger area feel more claustrophobic. For CUVs/SUVs, the higher ground clearance, bigger and fatter wheels/tyres, and the bottom plastic cladding, helps in the urban jungle (aka bad city roads). They also usually have higher resale values now, compared to all other normal kinds of cars and MPVs.
@@AccuCat Yeah. That's what I mean. Thanks.
Mazda is really on top of their game. All their cars look sleek, handle great and have excelent interiors. I swear the current Mazda 3 is better put together and feels better than a BMW that is double the price.
You swear on cars that you've never owned? I love both Mazda and BMW but you're delusional here. So many noobs think luxury brands are double the price only for the badge, they couldn't be more wrong. The badge factor is probably no more than 10%. You cannot get away with delivering actual good products simply by having a badge in a highly competitive industry.
@@dailyrant4068 Well, I had sat in a Mercedes C class before, not once or twice, but on at least a monthly basis, and was shocked at how creaky the interior plastic was for a brand that calls itself "premium". Mercedes aren't on Toyota's level of reliability either so what was he paying for then? Doubt that BMWs would be much different... What's BMW anyways? A company that puts certain features behind a paywall in your OWN CAR deserves no respect. I have zero respect for these pathetic excuses for cars. Their old cars are legendary, but their new cars are simply atrocious both on the inside and on the outside... Sure, their interior might be comfy and well built unlike the "cheaper" Mercedes(at least as far as I remember my friend's father's 2011 BMW 5 series was quite nice), but at what cost?
Edit: typo
@@IWishIDidntExist2333 you haven’t really made a point. So you either got an old C class or a defective one. Bottom line is car manufacturers can’t get away with poorly built products without being called out. I’ve owned 3 BMWs and never had major issues. I also have a Tesla which like you would read about in forums, have crappy built quality. You can generalize and stereotype all you want, statistics are there for you to see
@@dailyrant4068 The car is from 2019 and by no means a defective one. You can't say that it is not taken care of either, because there are no kids or pets in it, and it isn't even a daily driver. Since you called me out on my "generalizing" (how awful am I for speaking up about my experiences with overrated german brands, smh), I'm politely asking for those "statistics" you are talking about. All the statistics I see are about their decline of quality and reliability plus the astronomical maintenance costs, and them being filled with overengineered sophisticated features that will probably start to fail once the warranty has run out. And, before you slit my throat for having a negative opinion of the brand that is close to your heart, I must disclose that what I've written above is solely my opinion/experience with german premiums, therefore, it's not written like a law, it doesn't have to be exactly like that. I'm happy that you had fun with your BMWs and that there were no issues.
And on the topic of Tesla... Tesla is kinda similar to these german brands, as they are quite controversial. I have heard, that they are outrageously overpriced and hyped, however, I had also heard that some people love their Teslas so much that this brand will be the only one they'll buy from. With that being said, I do agree with your point, their quality is quite lacking, considering their relatively high price.
Well done Mazda. 2.0l engine is really a big deal nowadays in Europe. The new 2008 has a 3 cylinder engine and then Mazda comes along with this lovely 4 cyl. Nicely done
Just for you to know. From all the channels related to cars I am subscribed (English, French’s, Italians... even Brazilian ones) your channel is by far my reference. Thanks for sharing these so honest and professional test. You’ve got a happy follower in Madrid
Thanks. Have a great Sunday!
One of my favourite reviewers for sure. Well researched & informative, funny and so much more. Marek deserves a whole lot more subscribers and views(videos).
Thanks for taking the time to drive the Skyactiv-X version too, I've been hard pressed to find any good impressions of it online and I'm currently looking very hard at the Mazda 3 with it. But I have to wait until the Skyactiv-X hits the dealerships here in Denmark in October.
Definitely drive it first. It's miles better, than the G, but as far as everyday usability is concerned, it's like any modern turbo engine. Reliability remains a great unknown.
Thank´s Marek! The CX-30 is a Mazda 3 with normaly ground clearance. That´s one reason why more people buy SUV´s or Crossover. You just have to compare the ground clearances from older compact cars and new SUV´s , it is very similar :) Normally, a Mazda 3 or Corolla would be enough, but you have even in the city a limited range of action.
Thanks for the Skyactiv X explanation in this video. Sounds like a big step forward for petrol engines.
Dude, I completely forgot about the cx7 until now. I hadn't thought of the empty void between the cx5 and cx9
TFiPW I used to own a CX-7- hahaha
This guy seems very picky, particularly with Mazda products I notice. A Euro car fanboy evidently. I have read a few UK press reviews and they appear to rate the Cx30 very highly in all regards. Only thing they seem to criticise is practicality compared to rivals.
Yup, and the only guy to notice any vibration when the cylinders de-activate too.
Gets the thumbs down from me.
@@Logan.Ninefingers in fact, you should thank him for this obdervation! And that is what differentiate Marek from others. He can get sometimes very picky but it is helpful for those who realy want to buy a car so they not find out the "picky things" after already buying it.
I think being picky is a good thing, as it shows the manufacturers what to do and what not to do
Dilivered and picked up the cx30 X. Special detail said was: THE
COMPRESSED IGNITION WILL START AFTER 500KM, before that it will use the
spark plugs.
The black cladding gets on my nerves, I love everything else though..
Very cheap looking.
I’d rather have small scratches on my car that I can fix than having all that black cladding that messes up the looks of the car
I like it. I think it adds bold contrast.
Try not to let it worry you, or lose any sleep!
Just don’t buy one…let everyone who does like it do the buying! 🙄
@@ricetea1 Yeah, ok! 🙄
The 2 l standard engine rates in Thailand 165 HP for the Mazda 3 and 156 HP for the CX-3 - and this is quite good.
So this CX-30 is based on the new, latest Mazda 3, unlike the CX-3 which is based on (now older) Mazda 2? Did I get it right?
That's correct.
Accu Cat Thanks for the comprehensive response. I haven’t heard about this model in the U.S. but I might imagine it replacing our current CX-3 which is just too small for its class here.
@@MarekDrives , I think You seemed to fail to mention at the start.. that its a Hybrid . Thats the whole point of this car !
Excellent review. We appreciate it from the United States.
I will wait for a 2.5L version of this - hopefully not too far away. 👍
I want the 2.5 turbo AWD M-hybrid :)
that end of the car ( door and mini window behind the second door) should be on new Mazda 3. and I am in.
Absolutely. They never leave stent to the consumer.
Your reviews are the best !
I appreciate that!
What is the value of Fast closing trunk gate? I think slow is advantage as if it goes slow: 1st advantage - it will not "bump" kids hard on their head = safer. 2nd advantage - if you want to take out big box with both hands - you press close - and have enough time to grap and get out. So slow closing - is advantage
Depends on the use case scenario.
1. If kids are dumb enough to stick their heads in the boot, when the lid is closing, they'll learn the hard way.
2. Some brands have sensors or a delay function allowing you to take out whatever you need, before the lid starts closing.
For me the problem with slowly closing tailgate is that I may have the car out of sight, before the tailgate actually closes. And that's a safety/security risk.
@@MarekDrives you can always use 4 seconds of your time and wait for it to close properly before leaving.....I mean, really dude?????? At least it closes by itself, which is more than I can say for most cars.....
Interior quality, style, standard equipment and driving are far beyond anything VW and Honda do in this segment. I like Honda's petrol engines and VW's diesele but somehow they started selling hard plastics borring boxes. Personaly I was very disapointed by T-Rock's quality and driving and I can hardy relate it cx 30 which feels far more mature and premium.
Well said and agreed. But I'll add that (negatives) VW's long-term reliability, and the refinement and interior material quality in many Honda models are quite bad, the compact ones especially.
I was never on an SUV side, but after owning 4 sedans, I am getting bored of the concept, they are all the same. SUVs, however, are becoming more and more economical, dynamic, good looking and you can't escape the idea of practicality and comfort.
In other words, SUVs are becoming more and more hatchbacks/estates.
Due to the fact that SUVs are so popular and that market is very competitive this is where car manufacturers put their most research and development. So there is a higher chance that an SUV will be simply better than a sedan in their respective segments. An example on the US market is VW with their Passat and Atlas models. Passat's last refresh has been a huge disapointment and Atlas is praised by many as one of the best SUVs in its class.
In Australia the CX-5 sells like crazy.
The music is annoying
Purchased the Premium cx30 exterior gray metallic, interior white leather. Extremely smooth and quiet, plenty of power, comfortable and well laid out. Better looking than the cx5. One pet peeve NO Navigation unless you buy the card for another 400.00 bucks, that is what is known as a rip off.
Nice video, you should make review on new Kia Xceed and compare it to cx-30 in your comments. It would be great!
As a "mature" guy, the main reason I prefer a crossover is that they are easy to climb in and out of.
Actually a minivan jest much better (like a Golf Sportsvan or a BMW 2 Series Active Tourer or Mercedes-Benz B Class), because you don't have to lift your feet as high, as in a crossover, but crossovers are more trendy.
If the massive black plastic cladding was an exterior option, I'd be more than happy to fork over $35K
I cant wait for them to officially announce the 2020 Mazda CX-5! I think it will have that new infotainment and dial, which I have been waiting for forever now. I hate the infotainment we have right now in the 2019 mazda cx 5.
The cx5 is the top selling suv in Australia... however the new rave 4 is starting to pose a threat
Yes, the RAV4 hybrid version will undoubtedly take the crown, at least before the next generation CX-5. I see the NON-hybrid RAV4 models as far less desirable than the Mazda unless one really does need a bit more space. I no longer need a big car or one particularly fast so the CX-30 is really appealing to me - it looks good, is comfortable, easy to park, goes well enough (2.5ltr engine) and has a touch of class. I'll likely buy it if I get a decent trade-in price offer. My only wishes are for the options of the red interior available in the Mazda 3 hatch and ventilated front seats. In which case I couldn't get to the local dealer fast enough.
Just about every other reviewer of this car talks about how much fun it is to drive and how well it handles and that it is VERY similar to the 3 which another reviewer who races cars said carves fast corners like a knife through butter (their words).
The more I think about it, the poorer the analogy :)
I find it hard to relate to "every other reviewer", since I haven't seen their reviews.
the CX-30 with the 2.0 litre Skyactiv-G petrol engine produces 163 hp at 6,000 rpm and 213 Nm of torque at 4,000 rpm.
Mazda 3 is a superb car but too low. In UK roads full of potholes and speed bumps... CX 30 much better.
..not only in UK :) If I compare the ground clearance from older compact cars and new SUV´s , it´s almost the same.
Some people like crossovers because they feel pressured to buy them as their friends have them and they have to copy them as they cannot think for themselves
For a certain percentage, yes. But for others, there are a lot of reasons to get one. I personally have a crossover city car, a low riding sportier exec sedan, and a 4x4 diesel SUV with low range, for long distance drives and off-roading/camping. All to be used within the family of course. Most times when we are in the city, we would all be fighting to use the B-segment CUV of course :)
We bought 4 Mazda's for the company, 2x cx3, the 6 and a cx5.All with the sky active motors. 3 of them the camshaft broke. Not a lot of service from Mazda. We ditched the Mazda's and bought kia's and ford's.
I pick mine up today, AWD premium trim, trading in my GT 3 hatch. I have been waiting for something like this, the cx5 costs too much and is too big, and the cx3 is too small.
Black cladding does not bother me. Mazda paint is usually thin.
My top car brands is 1. Lexus 2. Toyota 3. Mazda 4. Suzuki 5. Subaru 6. Ssangyong 7. Porsche 8. Audi
haha. what about Honda ?
@@green323turbo i forgot 7 honda .. 9 audi
Why Suzuki?
@@cat8308 good quality . this list is quality list . not a driving feature
This is the Mazda CX-30... This is the Mazda CX-30 with massive, out of proportion, black plastic cladding...
Nice review as always
I think the exterior use too much plastic cladding and a disproportional glass size.
I and I think most people agree with you on the exterior bottom black plastic (I still want to wait to see it in person a few times before finally judging it), but I like everything thing else about the exterior design, proportions, length, etc. of this CX-30.
I think it's useful for everyday use. Those areas on my current car are one could say damaged in a way that they have some scratches and similar from door opening in tight spaces and who knows what else and not by my fault. So many times I saw cars park next to my and door from those cars hit my car in those areas whem opened. So it may not be beautiful but it is practical. Plus winter use and damage from rocks.
Regular 5.5 to 5.8ltr p/100km achieveable on this Rav4 by using radar cruise control. Leave in Eco mode also. Base spec, 'Luna' in Ireland, has no lumbar support, which is a big miss. Great over taking ability when in power mode. Road noise can sometimes be intrusive, but it is a great car overall. My wife loves hers.
To many so called car experts who are not experts. This guy is talking but he has very little real knowledge. He likes the Citroen but I bet he doesn't own one. Mazda actually builds many of it's cars in Japan. Also Mazda rarely uses turbos as any mechanic will tell that expensive turbo chargers are not likely to last as long as most well engineered naturally aspirated engines. The top Japanese car manufacturers engineer their cars to last 200,000 miles! Without problems! That's why they are on top of reliability charts and have excellent resale. Mazda's Sky Active X engine has 3 important features. Superior power, superior economy and ultra clean burn producing far less pollution than any other combustion engine. If Mazda's new engine design proves as reliable as OHC Japanese engines are known for. This engine could provide a real bridge allowing battery technology to further improve so ranges will extend, without the penalty caused by normal combustion engines. You are a lazy car showcase! Shame!
Actually I own a Mazda, so your rant loses some of its impact :-)
Excellent review I just purchased a used top (sp) model in Thailand today. Skyactive g is the best they have so I I'm hopping for the best. Thanks David
Have fun!
Anyone else feel the vibrations in two cylinder mode? I know I did, they were really bad at times, sometimes would shake the dashboard. There is now a TSB out for updated radiator mounts and software that helps to reduce the vibrations. If you have this issue, ask about this fix. I think some vibrate more then others
I was surprised that this newest Mazda is not that great driving car because of the torsion beam suspension in the back. In case of Mazda 3, I read few opinions that the rear torsion beam suspension is so well dialed in that you can't tell. Also, cylinder deactivation in a 4 cylinder engine is not the best idea.
Mazda3 understeers, which I suspect may be a way to mask the torsion beam working. In the CX-30 if you push it, it's all over the place. Controllable in the dry, but if someone is brave enough to drive it hard in the wet, it's going to end up in a ditch.
But note of course, that the European tuning could be different compared to other countries. Either for more comfort or better handling. Still and yes, Mazda wants to go upmarket now and challenge some of the players who have more refined and comfortable cars - and that will come at the expense of handling, and even the steering feel and weight. I have yet to read a review on the AWD CX-30, and I wonder if that will still have a rear torsion beam?
@@AccuCat I appreciate Mazda targeting the premium market but let's face it, it's an uphill battle destined for failure. Let's not kid ourselves, no matter how nice the cars will be, nobody will look at Mazda and think premium or luxury. This route has been traveled by VW with Phaeton and Hyundai with Genesis model. Personally, I would like Mazda to concentrate on making best driving cars and for premium/luxury market resurrect their Xedos sub-brand or Millenia name which I believe was a single model.
@@BrokenFiddles Luxur"ious" though is not luxury 😁 I travel to many countries/states in Asia, Australia and NZ regularly where Mazda is doing very well and among the best sellers in their class, and respected for their reliability, exterior and interior design and quality, Zoom-Zoom feel, and growing refinement with certain models like the CX-9 and new 3/CX-30. Most don't even consider the other Japanese non-luxury brands competition for them, and they compete in that weird upper-middle ground with VW (whom Mazda are better Spec'd against and rate better for reliability), and even take some sales from BMW and Mercedes among others.
I "wouldn't" bet against Mazda in the long-term, and their plans and for initial future models like the 6 are out there - Google. Mazda are also in a powerful alliance now with Toyota/Lexus, Suzuki, Subaru, etc. to counter the Nissan, Renault & Mitsubishi alliance, and Honda who have been doing very well.
In many of these places I visit (and read car news/reviews on or hear from the locals), high quality China cars like Geely are already available, or will be coming in soon. Also, Japanese brands like Daihatsu (fully owned Toyota subsidiary now) or Suzuki (Maruti Suzuki dominates in India), are making even better quality cars now with higher levels of spec/included kit, and we haven't even mentioned the Koreans. All of these factors and a few more, affect the sales of cheaper Mazda models. For example, they even pulled out their Biante MPV for example in countries where those kind of vehicles still sell decently well, and there is no new Biante or Mazda compact MPV in the horizon. Mitsubishi, Daihatsu, Suzuki, Renault and Nissan are still competing in this Compact MPV segment by the way.
Anyway, Mazda probably thinks it has no choice but to go more upmarket, but they will probably still have the entry trim to compete with VW, and the high-spec priced close to BMW rival model. Most cars are getting more expensive anyway, but note that Mazda prices/packages/deals in many countries in these region, are better than in Europe.
Nice review Marek, greetings from Romania
How would you compare mazda cx30 with honda hrv, confort engine, leaving aside the looks where mazda in playing in it's own league
In terms of practicality I'd say Honda wins hands down. Mazda has better quality interior and (subjectively) more interesting design in and out. But as one German engineer put it: if it's not useful, it's not design :)
Mazda needs to realize that moving upscale and more premium usually means minimizing all that black trim to be less noticeable or not there at all. Look at luxury SUVs, most have no plastic cladding at all or just a very thin lip of such around the fender. Mazda decided to go give this car a heavy dose of black cladding....more then any other Ive seen aside the Honda Element....no thanks.
Volkswagen Tiguan is based on the Passat and is larger than the CX-30. It's direct competitor is the CX-5, which it beasts on interior space - especially rear passenger space. Same goes for the 3008. This is more a response to Toyota C-HR, Honda HRV, Subaru XV, VW T-Roc. At 430 L the boot is clearly smaller that the CX-5 506L (480 with spare wheel) wich in turn is smaller than the Tiguan's 521L boot, with the seats all the way back and 615 with the seats all the way in front. Where do you get your info? Are you comparing with the 2012 Tiguan?
Great camera angles with the CX-30 X motor.
Finally someone pronouncing Mazda and not Marzda
I imagine that the LCD screen was purposely set back so far to PREVENT people from trying to operate the screen, leaning forward, while driving. This would cause a significant distraction and cause an accident. This is the mentality of controls being on the steering wheel such as radio operation and leaning to the radio vice thumbs coming off the outer ring of the steering wheel and towards the hub.
Mercedes gives you a choice. MBUX can be operated via touchpad on the center console, touchpad on the steering wheel or touchscreen. Or voice commands. And it all works.
Hi, great review!
I have ordered a skyactiv-x, fwd, manual version, likely
arriving in December. There was no way I could have tested it yet, but I did test mazda 3 with skyactiv-g engine. Did notice slight roughness in 2-cylinder mode.
I am curious though, did you test a skyactive-x model with automatic gearbox? I think I noticed paddles on the steering column. I expect fuel consumption somewhere around or even slightly below 6 liters per 100 km with manual.
Also, the tech data I got clearly states that skyactive-x also comes with cylinder deactivation. Are you sure it doesn't?
Did you notice any occasional knocks in your preproduction model?
Yes, it was an automatic.
G and X are mild hybrids, but cylinder deactivation is only on the G. I double checked the technical specification.
Another great video.. thanks, I am considering buying a cx30 against a Kia Niro or possibly a Honda Civic
Love your reviews. This is a cute car, but there is strong competition for 2020 small crossovers. In US the standard engine is reported to be the 2.5L with 186 hp and 186 lb-ft of torque, so more fun to drive than the 2.0 you tested. It will be nice when the Skyactiv-X becomes available; it really should become the standard engine. I would rather have a CR-V hybrid or RAV4 hybrid; better use of interior space for passengers and cargo, plus more power and mpg. Mazda needs to join the hybrid revolution.
your attempted character assassination on the CX-5's and Mazda's fun car reputation sounds oh so clever but leaves me as confused as your state of mind. The entire video is full of ridiculous comparisons fueled by an obvious and bizarre bias.
Driving a SUV admittedly too fast through a turn then complaining the vehicle's handling isn't up to it, has no value to the viewer. It can showcase your review of the vehicles limits, but only when it is framed as such. Reviewing a car isn't akin to a journey through the aisles in Target knocking items off the shelf only to complain to assistant manger Karen, that the store is a mess.
To use your analogy, CX-5 is a Target store, where Karen the manager told the staff to watch out for clients behaving silly.
Kind of agree with you he seemed a little hard on the CX-30 about attacking corners. Of course it’s not designed for taking fast corners as he said. But he also told us the twist beam is less advanced than the independent suspension. He mentioned Mazda was about driving fun but that driving fun doesn’t sell as well as driving comfort. I push my 2019 Tiguan hard around corners and it’s fun but it’s not carving the corners like a BMW obviously. I feel confident the buyers of this CX-30 won’t drive aggressively.
In Australia a 2.5 litre naturally-aspirated engine is available. I understand this is quicker than the SkyactivX.
I'd say it's as bad :)
The 2.5 NA (it's the top engine for the Mazda6 here in Europe) is mated to a 6-speed auto, and it's just a dog. You have to rev the hell out of it.
They just introduced a 150 hp Skyactiv-G, which should be the sweet spot between the gutless 120G and overpriced 180X.
@@MarekDrives Thanks for responding. I think the preferred engine you refer to is the one on sale here (we only get one the option until Skyactiv-X arrives around October). It is a 2.5 Skyactiv-G but the HP converts to 186 (torque also 186 lb-ft), same as the one sold in the U.S. Over here those figures are quoted as 139KW/252NM. Maybe it is tweaked for different outputs in different markets? Anyway, hopefully it should be OK for power, even though the maximum torque comes in at a lot higher revs than a turbo engine.
Very well done
Can't really say I understand your comments on the electric tail gate 🤔
leonardleonunu he says it opens up too slow
Filmed with Panasonic Lumix GH5: amzn.to/2L6iNar
DJI Phantom4: amzn.to/2ZqUWaT
and Insta360 One X amzn.to/2WI5EwX
Edited on MacBook Pro: amzn.to/31zYWrR
And my sunglasses, because some of you are asking Ray-Ban Justin: amzn.to/2WrSlvE
(The above are affliliate links. If you buy products through them I get a small commission at no extra cost to you. Thanks!)
7:20 - look at the background, Chemtrails in the sky .
This car was on our short list for our new family car but finally we decided against it. Mainly because we didn’t want the Skyactive G spec engine but the Scyactive X spec engine but as it is brand new, we don’t want to be beta testers for Mazda. Finally we decided we buy a new Volvo XC40 and we ordered it recently. We like the look & styling of the CX-30 a lot and our CX-5 was a great car. But now we are looking forward to get our Volvo. It will be our 4th Volvo in 20 years.
Too many manufacturers now making cars that look far too similar to the model above or below it. Makes me admire something like the mx5 if only for being a bit different.
Far too many manufacturers make cars that look similar in general. I've just watched the new Ford Escape launch video, and I had to check whether Mazda and Ford are still cooperating :)
Specifications will differ where the car is made, where we live ours will be made in Thailand, our country does not even have the manual transmission option only the auto.
Ive got 2009 2.4 honda accord that does 5.1ltres per 100km...whats going on with new cars. Mine has definatley payed back the environment at its age now. Are we being lied too?😂
Amazing. 18 minutes. All you get to see of the interior dashboard is the infortainment screen. Sorry a car review needs to feature the CABIN POV. at least once.
😔 Why oh why is there no USB port in the rear 😳
The problem is the space inside, if you are tiny like this guy it fune but if you are 6'5 there is no space in the back left.
Every review on the web implies that, an otherwise great small suv, is let down by the engine range... Do you share the same opinion? Would you prefer the skyactiv-x over the bmw x2 s18i? Thanks!
X2 is crap regardless of the engine.
CX-30 is let down by the engines and handling.
so witch suv in this price range is fast and good to drive in corners then ??? you keep saying its no good so what is your favorite one then in this PRICE RANGE
I don't know why people choose SUV over MPV. Does MPV out of fashion? Everybody seems to take care of nutrition, stay fit, trying various environment friendly things but still buys SUV with easy access which is important for older or with disabilities people.
MPV os practically dead segment... This is the new mpv... raised up hatchbacks if you will. More space, bit more comfy... Increased ground clearance etc... Sales figures say that people want them and that's reasonable. Less and less people choose to sit so low like they are in racing cars... Take new 508 for example, saeting height is criminally low, like it's not a bloody sedan... just for example... sedans aren't comfy as they used to be and ground clearance also... I know it's meant to be some kind of 4 door sporty sedan/coupe but...
@@JohnyMcNeal I agree. Some of those SUVs look like lifted MPV with dark plastic protective parts. Yup some sedans pretend to look sporty. Maybe because some manufacturers abandoned coupe segment.
Looks good, but a 2 litre engine with 122bhp? The 2 litre Ford Sierra my Dad bought in 1990 made more power than that! Progress...
Well this one uses significantly less fuel and emits far fewer emissions for the same power. So that's where the progress went. Which is fine with me.
Nothing wrong with 120bhp
markomarko Each to their own.
All that black plastic on the whole bottom half of the car and around the wheels makes it butt ugly! Reduce it to half or less and it would look 1000x better Mazda!
Dear Mazda , please replace the CX-5 rear with this one. Thanks.
The CX3 is way too small.
Then get a CX5
Clearly a eurocar snob...
He's the European version of Alex on Autos lol
@@LuisGonzalez-sb9lx LOL :)
Do not like the big plastic wide wheel well cladding! Ugh!
I see 10x more cx5 than rav4 ...
I don't know where you live, but here in Florida there are 10 times more RAV4 than CX 5. I was even considering a RAV but told myself I wanted something a bit less common.
Thank you!
At 5:07 I can see the door trim flex. Or is it the door underneath flexing?
The majority of the people who complain on this video about the car can not afford it. Keep your stinking useless complaints to yourselves. Black cladding this black cladding that. The 2l engine is too slow yada yada yada. Shut up and go buy your preferred cars.
Not great, not terrible
The skyactive engine was the reason i didnt get the cx5. Underpowered!
Nice. But lack of back seat space
I hate the plastic trim around the wheel. To big!!!
*too
A huge pass just like the little CX3 I wouldn't even bother with either CX5 is the best choice. As the CX3 AND CX-30 failed the moose test both almost flipping over, the only one that passed was the CX5 . Don't believe me check out the test yourself here on CZcams.
This looks nice but I think I’ll be keeping my 2019 VW Tiguan until VW releases their new Atlas Cross Sport w/ available V6 and ventilated front seats with cavernous cargo capacity and large 2nd row seats!!! I can’t wait! Thanks for this thorough review Marek! I agree the CX-30 should sell well for Mazda here in the United States
This is Mazda CX30 with massive black plastic cladding, This is CX4 without massive black plastic cladding, .... CX4 hands down has a better appearance, and is only available in China, which begs the question how soon can Mazda bring the CX4 to North America? If sales tank due to the mysterious black plastic plastic stuck on the exterior of the CX30, it could be sooner than we think
Absolutely not, the CX-4 is based on the older platform, they are not going to bring it in, especially now that they have 3 SUVs in such close proximity.
How does it handle compared to cx-5?
Both are underpowered, but at least the CX-5 can corner fast(er).
Nice mazda car
China cx30 are full independent front and rear right... tortion is a big mistake
Probably CX-4.
120 hp is Very under powered by todays standards ... most people hate the CX3 low HP engine in America , this is a heavier car ..WTF ?
@10:16 you're saying the boot is larger than on a Tiguan? The VW has a rated 615l (back seats pushed forward) boot space and ~500l with the seats in normal position.
My mistake. Someone pointed it out already. I have no clue what came over me.
Stefan P. I own a 2019 Tiguan and I was wondering about this comment. My Tiguan cargo area looks larger to me. And huge with my back seat folded down. I am not sure how accurate his comment is.
@@2004cyrus, He already answered Stefan's inquiry, 3 months ago, and admitted that he made a mistake with the cargo area comparisons. That answer is right above your comment.
I just want the CX-7 back....
I have the cx 7 and love it
The CX-7 is basically the CX-5 now, but in other markets, Mazda sells another model called the CX-8. CX-8 is along the lines of the Santa Fe and the Highlander
correct me if i'm wrong.. 2L naturally aspirated engine with only 120hp? my 2009 beatup still surviving 1.6L Kia Cerato Forte sedan is 124hp. or did he say wrongly?
I said 120 hp. Mazda says they have a high compression ratio, which is supposed to make the car feel more dynamic despite low horsepower. I'll take my turbo, please.
@@MarekDrives interesting. Thanks
If it were your money would you take a T-Roc 1.5 TFSI over the Cx 30?
I'd probably take the T-Cross, and keep the change.
The CX-30 comes very well equipped, while the T-Roc add-ons are more expensive, and inflate the price by quite a bit. And its even a smaller looking and a shorter length SUV.
Instead of square T-Roc with horror interior I would buy a Dacia Duster and keep the change.
11:32 drone cam following?
360 camera. Link in the pinned comment.
So essentially it's a heavier, more expensive, taller, ugly plastic cladding galore, Mazda 3 hatch?
Yup.
@@MarekDrives hahaha Marek this is why I love. Greetings from the States. Great work as always
Nice car
Cx 7 2020????
Mazda bang on about SkyActive. But the flame path is off centre in the combustion chamber. Which we have all been told is a bad thing. For an even burn. And judging by the unremarkable performance and MPG of no real advantage.
Not true. Mazda's skyactiv units have some of the best real world economy figures, compared to downsized turbo petrol units which are inefficient a lot of the time. Very difficult to get near the claimed economy figures with small capacity turbos...
cx30 just looks like a cx 3 in a cx5 scale.