Video není dostupné.
Omlouváme se.
WSU: 100 Years of Gravitational Waves with Rai Weiss
Vložit
- čas přidán 13. 08. 2024
- Nobel laureate Rai Weiss is best known as one of the original creators of the Laser Interferometer Gravitational-Wave Observatory (LIGO). Join him as he explores the history of this amazing project and the technology that made it a reality. #WorldSciU
This lecture was filmed on May 30, 2015 at the World Science Festival in New York City.
Experience the associated free online course at World Science U: worldscienceu....
0:00 - Start
From Einstein to LIGO - 00:00:05
Turning a Thought Experiment into Reality - 00:20:04
LIGO's Success - 00:38:54
Official Site: www.worldscien...
Twitter: / worldscienceu
Facebook: / worldscienceu
Instagram: / worldscienceu
Subscribe: / @worldscienceu
This was awesome. I got blasted, much of it beyond my understanding, but came out of it knowing a lot more than before. I can tell this guy really knows his field, and is excited about it.
Thank you Maria Spiropulu for this fascinating presentation incorporating the Higgs bosons particles in the in future direction of particles physics and condensed phases in the and symmetry issues ahead.
Relly awesome i knew very little of this before now. Thank you for getting lay people into science more..my grandkids thank you also!
Thank you for a great lecture, you are wonderful teacher. It’s amazing how physics of gravitational wave is expanding our horizon to understand the universe.
Pre-CMB stuff is gonna be awesome to know. Are we collapsing the wave by measuring it?
Just a small spark distorts space to me, even light gets distorted by light.
🤯🙏
❤😃👍
real life Dr. Robert Ford
😍🤩
I didn't know Einstein's wrote a paper in 2016.
He's not a very good speaker, he sounds doddering, mentioning important things almost as an afterthought at times, and his voice quavers sometimes, distracting.
I zone out when a speaker is good. This keeps me on my feet
He's made numerous errors as well. With regards to describing the calculation of the ratio of gravitation to mass. Also he referred to Einstein's 1916 paper as 'the 2016 paper'... Twice...
Who cares? Its good data and hes not THAT bad.
And hes talking without a script. Only prompted by the slides
@@RickBoat true enough, the data checks out. Those who care enough to pick apart little mistakes would likely be taking those mistakes out of context. I'd give him a B or C for effort.