They are lying. I've called them out on it every single time they have claimed this. It's HALF the performance than the 10700. A measly 4 core is not going to beat an old 8 core that's clocked way higher. I pulled the cinebench scores and it's almost exactly half the performance of the 10700
â@@tenderandmoist5011 single core speed is almost exactly the same. The people in the video really don't know what they are talking about. The i3 is half the total speed of the i7
Yes bro he said at max settings 120fps but when I saw the same by seeing benchmarks it was around 90fps It is a good number but i dont think he said was true
@@ryzenpeak Actually, the i3 12100f is actually a beast band for the buck.. it can rival the ryzen 5 3600, and is very near the ryzen 5 5500 in terms of raw power
No shit Sherlock, he has the 3060 I wish I could have gotten my hands on. Nvidia being stingy with VRAM ruins your PC, I'd be in an unfortunate situation if I played more graphically intense games
â@@pugorilla8848 the 3060 12gb is going around for 280-330$. Id say its a good price for gaming and content creation. Else you woulf wanna get an amd gpu since they are gonna deliver more price to performance in games.
â@@thoz6363 ive found that if it doesnt land perfectly the first time you should throw your motherboard like a frisbee a few times. It helps loosen your muscles.
This is the 30 series, the 75 percentile of the 30 series wasn't very bad, infact it was good at times. 40 series was where it all went downhill and Nvidia will continue to ruin p2p through corporate greed
@@UhmAhctuallythey didnât say the 30 series was bad. They said there wouldnât be an Nvidia gpu if it was price to performance, which is true when AMD shit is cheaper
Intel gpu driver arenât still mature, so thatâs kinda questionable What isnât questionable is that 6650xt costs $100 less and performs equally as well if not better
@@roughandrrag i reccommend the ones this guy makeâs especially if you live in usa bc the price of these are really cheap and they have amazing hardware
"Great price to performance" "Best gpu for the mainstream gamer" So we're just gonna ignore that you can a 6700xt for the price of a 3060, and that it'll destroy anything up to a 3070 in raster performance? Additionally, you can get 3060 level performance from a rx6600xt which is significantly cheaper than a 3060. And for all the ppl that will argue: "but muh ray tracing", good luck doing ray tracing on a 3060. I bought one earlier this year, returned it and got a 6700xt for 50⏠cheaper. Never looked back.
@@israelsanabria1676 agreed, and it's a fact that nvidia destroys amd in ray tracing. But people forget that 60 series card and even bordering on 70 series cards won't achieve good framerates with it enabled.
@@rFactoRHostageBanger yup, as I said on another comment, if u care too much about ray tracing, well, go to Nvidia. If u don't, then AMD is ur option. In my case, I just want to play, so I got a 6700xt, solid 1080p and 1440p performance while playing
There are specialized power tools for PC building. They have very very low torque settings so you don't over tighten anything. Kinda like how a normal drill will start to ratchet if it experiences too much resistance.
@@Maggot00679 you're thinking of an impact driver not a regular drill and the "ratcheting" is the impacts that drive the screws further in. so really you're thinking of a torque wrench.
It was the 3060 for me â ïž This build is similar to mine except my GPU got Nvidia's greed-treatment though it costed 140 less, it's price to performance and efficiency isn't as good as 3060's.
Just got my custom build finished today ryzen 7 5800x3d, ventus 3x 4070, vengance pro ddr4 ram 32gigs, msi mag b550 tomahawk corsair 4000D airflow, arctic liquid freezer 240, sp120mm fans, and an hp reverb g2 for just over 2 grand and i couldnt be happier with it
@@captainvenom4377 What issues? People just can't admit that Nvidia is money milking machine that is literally stealing money from it's customers. Amd destroys Nvidia in budget GPUs. 3060 is currently 100$ more expensive than 6600xt while being slower card. Nvidia's only advantage is ray tracing which is useless on budget cards, the only price/performance card that is reasonable from Nvidia is 4090.
As someone who has used a 3060: Fortnite: 100-150 FPS Max Settings, 1440p Minecraft Bedrock: 400-600 FPS Max Settings, 1440p Apex Legends: 100-200 FPS Max Settings, 1440p CPU: Intel Core i5 10600K RAM: 64 GB (4 x 16 GB) DDR4
no it doesnt, any nvidia gpu that is a 3000 series is a trash gpu when compared to amd, he could have gotten a 6700xt or maybe a 6750xt for the same price as the 3060, and gotten much more fps and much more power. Also even the 6600 xt which is under 300 dollars is faster than a 3060, and at warzone a 6600 is probably faster because nvidia cards suck at warzone, their drivers arent the best and even a 6600 which is like 200 dollars would get more fps than a 3060
â@@RamSVermaOfficial bro just admit you are a hardcore AMD supporter. I owned rtx 3050 and 3070 from the rtx series and an AMD Rx 6600xt, after all this time using it and running shit, the rtx is just better
@@tronroom8084 Hardcore AMD supporter when i own a gtx 1650, owned 3050, 3060, and 3070, currently on 3060 and never used a AMD card once in my life, or a amd CPU. Thats amazing!
@@tronroom8084 So thats all you got "rtx is just better" Also its better for me because I stream and edit vids. But in gaming the rx is better in raw performance. RTX 3060 is currently the most popular good card right now, I understand but what if you don't want a 3060 and want more performance? or have a cheaper budget. AMD wins in that, the rx 6600 on 200, 6750 at 400, close to rtx 3070 performance. Now ofc this is for gamers. this comment was a month ago, tbh I have changed sides now, and I'm just giving reasons why amd is better. I can give reasons why nvidia is better but my topic isn't about it so no. But all you said was about you owning a 3050 and 3070, and a 6600, then saying rtx is just better. Without any reason why. Also a 3050 is literally trash. Slower than a 2060, and in laptop versions they only have 4gb vram. They are trash.
â@@tronroom8084 it really is better? Still not enough to convince me to upgrade to RTX 4000 card, Nvidia giving bad prices and low vram. Ill stick with my rtx 3000 card until Nvidia improves or Intel drops a good battlemage series lineup
@@goddammit Yea I accept that before December Intel ARC was the worst graphics card coz of FPS drops and currently I am using this GPU in my gaming PC. After the recently update it almost solved all the FPS Drops issues which made it beat 3060.
Stop saying it's gaming performance is better than the i7 10700. The i7 has twice the cinebench scores and all modern games can utilize all 8 cores. The i3 has slightly better single core performance but the multi core is nearly HALF of the i7. This is misleading to people, making them think they got an equivalent high end cpu from just a couple generations ago for an amazing price, when in reality they got half of that for the price of the lowest end I series cpu that's sold.
@Tron room you are not a pc specialist. I did my research, not like I even had to from what I know. The new i3 has slightly higher single core performance. The i7 has nearly twice as much multi core performance. Its faster in applications that only use 1 core (no modern applications use only 1 core). Games are multi threaded, so they can easily utilize up to 16, some even 32 cores. I3 is faster in single core, i7 is faster in multi core, games are not single core, they are multi core, end of story. The i7 could handle twice the fps before getting bottlenecked. This pc is a scam, the price is a scam, the performance claims are a scam, the marketing is a scam. The whole operation is a SCAM.
@andreamaral9725 the multicore is almost twice as much. I don't get my information anywhere, I do benchmarks and I compare the numbers, game are multicore applications that can use well over the 8 available cores on such cpus. Games don't benefit from single core. They are multi core workloads.
@andreamaral9725 it's not twice as much but it'd nearly twice as much. Last I checked the single core is only 3% higher, which is 12% if your comparing 4 cores to 4 cores, but the i7 has twice the amount of cores. Your single core bump only matters when you have the same or more cores as another cpu. Every single game since around 2008 has been able to use 8 cores. Modern games from around 2015 and on can use 20. I'm not wrong. Single core only matters when you are comparing cpus that have the same core count. The i3 is 4 cores. The i7 is 8 cores. It DOES perform better in all games, even excluding the fact it has extra power to keep background processes from stealing the cpu from games, because it has MORE CORES and MORE THREADS. Look at cinebench r23 scores for the cpus. The i7 is faster in all core workloads like gaming, rendering, encoding, compiling, etc. You can often find the i7 for cheap. It's absolutely pathetic that you've let some youtuber gaslight you into thinking a ever so slightly newer i3 performs better than a ever so slightly older i7. It doesn't. You are living a lie.
â@@Rougecombecause it is trash. Just because it has tensor cores doesn't mean that it can run ray tracing just like the 3090 or any high end card can, use some logic.
â@David Boscanin bru the i3 is in toe with a r9 5950x with single core. while having more chache, PCIE 5.0 compared to the 5500 3.0 and the i3 runs at lower watts and support for ddr5 all while being what? 20 bucks more
i had a 3060 and a i5 11400 with 16 gigs of carsair ram and it was clocked to 3200 MHz and at 1080p i could only get 90 fps on medium settings and being upscaled with dlss set to balanced at 1440p medium settings dlss set to balanced i got 75 to 80 fps but never 100 fps so this is lies the 3060 is a decent card not gonna lie but it wont get 120 fps on warzone 2
I remember the days when the top cpus were just 4 cores, cause if they punch hard thatâs all you need! People recommending 8 cores for gaming rigs are wasting money
@@Zebra_Paw Of course, you're getting more cores and threads with the 5600, unlike the 12100F, or even a 13100F. But I would go for a 6600 instead of a 3060. Just because of it's price to performance ratio. RX 6600 costs like 240$ in my country, while the 3060 costs like 360$ and up. But the performance is similar when it comes to gaming, but if you wanna do some productivity aswell, then 3060 is better. A770 or A750 performs good too, but they're still kind of unstable.
@@Zebra_Paw I personally own two cards. A 3060 and a 3080 Ti. And I can guarantee you that 3060 isn't a bad card. It's just the price tag what gives it a bad price to performance ratio. But if you really want that 4 GB extra vram, then 3060 is a much better choice. Other than that, 6600 any day. Sadly that 3060 8 GB is nothing but a gimmick. It's pretty much a renamed 3050 Ti. Just a waste of money. And even now, I will recommend the 3060 or RX 6600 over the new 4060 and 4060 Ti's. They're not worth the money.
@@thedecoder0 yes I don't like the 4000 series either. I just checked prices on the 3060 and wow they are still much higher than I thought, so yes, probably go AMD or buy used at this price point
I build my new pc this year with i5 12400F and RX6700xt(which I brought for 350$ in my case it's cheaper than 3060 which is 470 $) so far I'm really happy with performance
Is there any driver issues and other issues cz im planning to buy the same build with either rtx 3060 or rx6700xt but Iâm afraid to buy rx since ma y people say it has issues and idk what .. please be honest
@@BambooAgeShorts I have been using rx6700xt since January this year every game runs smooth this far no issue of overheating or driver issues (I brought the asrock phantom gaming rx6700xt because it was somehow cheaper than the asus one with 2 fans) the card looks cool and I'm getting more fps with less money
I wouldn't call the 3060 a good price to performance card. Even a 6600xt/6650xt would be better value aka cheaper and would provide way better performance than the 3060. Too bad people buy for the brand, not for the performance and this shop doesn't help to change that mindset. đ Also 120fps average on max settings on warzone 2? I seriously doubt that.
@@YumeCanPvp Lmao, good luck running pathtracing on a 3060 đ€Łđ€Łđ€ŁIt's actually funny how many people Nvidia has fooled into believing that raytracing is a viable feature for the majority of gamers.
Isn't AMD dealing with driver issues again? This time it's actually damaging 6000 series cards.... You get what you pay for and when you buy the cheaper product, you get the cheaper product.
â@@AtteroDominatus and some nvidia rtx 40 had and still have problems burning his own power cables? Like like they said 6000 had no problem with drivers right now having a 6600xt with out any issue
These cpus are quite powerful as there's always a bottleneck where the GPU is weaker than the CPU so the GPU has to work harder so it can use its full potential so the core i3 is perfect with this
@@mrcooshie8436 he said productivity not gaming because gaming you dont benefit a lot from core counts. 4C/8T vs 8C/16T is a massive difference in multi core applications
Thats the exact combo I have 13th gen i5 and the 12gb version of the 3060 I went with 32gb DDR5 6400 G.Skill RGB RAM, an AIO watercooler for the CPU, and some other goodies Full Tower case, NVMe M.2 boot drive, a 4tb HDD for backups and storage, and a Corsair 1000w fully modular power supply 80+ Gold rated My PC cost around $1600 for everything...and it has enough RGB to make a clown blush đđđ
â@@dustinodunne3572sounds nice but def not a budget build at1600 (USD?) A 3060 is going to bottleneck you with a 13th gen I5 and 1000watts is way over your requirements. Good news is you're ready to upgrade to a 3090/6900xt++ with that PSU
@@natheayn6111 thats the plan!!! I just couldnt afford a 3090 at the same time as everything else đ€Łđ€Ł 3060 was the best I could get. Im not really planning on using it for gaming though, Im using it for cracking hashes and brute forcing logins. Im in training to become an Ethical Hacker...so the 12gb of VRAM of the 3060 Twin Edge was a better call for me starting off than anything else. I believe the 3090, 4080, and 4090 are the only Nvidia cards with more VRAM. Im not sure about AMDs cards though. I might upgrade to one of theirs next, because theyve open sourced their drivers for use in Linux
@@natheayn6111 yeah, I looked into it, and the AMD 6800 XT and better are the only AMD cards with more than 12gb of VRAM. Also, the 6800 XT is like $160 more than the 3060 was when I bought it 2 months ago. So I couldnt have afforded it I had a set budget of $2000, and needed an entire setup, including monitor, mouse, and keyboard (and stupid state sales taxes đźâđš) I had to be frugal and get the best bang for my buck. I appreciate your suggestions though!!! Thank you!!
Bad GPU choice. The 6600XT is much better for less price. The 3060 is horrendous in price/performance. It's not even good enough in raytracing, and DLSS isn't very useful at 1080p.
Yeh the 12 gig version was retarded. Itâs always been an 8 gig card performance-wise. The processing power wouldnât be able to keep up with the vram usage at higher resolution. Pointless. Just get the 8 gif version.
I feel sorry for people buying 3060 gpu Just buy an old gtx1080 and be happy If ur gunna buy a garbage card might aswell buy used card for 1/4 the price
That graphics card sells for 389-399. For 385 you can get an RX 6750 with 12GB of RAM on Newegg. We need to stop brainwashing gamers that don't know better into thinking NVIDIA is their only option.
amd doesn't have dlss. DLSS is a massive upgrade from fsr so nvidia is basically the best choice. Even if and performs better in raw performance, dlss is just such an important utility that going for nvidia is objectively the better choice. And if u can afford a 40 series that has frame generation, there's obviously no argument for amd.
@@ashenzenden No they don't have DLSS. They have FSR that is now up to FSR 2.1 and bey close in quality. AMD is soon to release FSR 3 and it will add frames just like DLSS 3 but you won't need special ridiculously overpriced hardware to use it (4000 series cards only). There obviously is an argument or you wouldn't have replied. Look in videos just bullying us and people like you are letting them get away with it get a freaking education on hardware and realize you have choices. It's because of people like you the hardware prices have stayed so damn high. INVIDES will break, they've essentially tripled the price of graphics cards over the past couple of years because of the mining craze and COVID. The mining craze is gone and the only market they have left is gamers. They have pissed most of us off to the point where we don't want anything to do with them I will not touch an Nvidia card until the price comes down to something reasonable. I have no tolerance for getting bullied into paying three times the amount a card is actually worth.
Manâs really had to drop my cpu being slower then the I3 my feelings are hurt lol
still a good cpu dont worry man
It's only slower in single thread and barely too, your CPU still shit on the i3 in multi-thread tasks don't worry
Shit the new i5 and i3 are crazy compared to shit we had 2 to 4 years ago lol
They are lying. I've called them out on it every single time they have claimed this. It's HALF the performance than the 10700.
A measly 4 core is not going to beat an old 8 core that's clocked way higher.
I pulled the cinebench scores and it's almost exactly half the performance of the 10700
â@@tenderandmoist5011 single core speed is almost exactly the same. The people in the video really don't know what they are talking about. The i3 is half the total speed of the i7
i think you should do fps test in warzone in the end
Yes bro he said at max settings 120fps but when I saw the same by seeing benchmarks it was around 90fps
It is a good number but i dont think he said was true
@@arduinocoder247 My 6900xt gets 120fps ar 1440p.
I have an rtx 3060 ti i7-11700k 32gb ram build and I get 90 at best at max settings with anti aliasing
@@elmeap6147 yeah thats because you shouldnt play this game... only played first day nothin more
@@kudorshi why shouldnât i
I personally would have gone with a Ryzen 5 5500 and an rx6600xt... That gpu is actually faster for a lower price than the 3060
And why did bro use an i3? đ€Łđ€Ł
@@ryzenpeak Actually, the i3 12100f is actually a beast band for the buck.. it can rival the ryzen 5 3600, and is very near the ryzen 5 5500 in terms of raw power
Pretty much at every price/performance range, intel cpus win
@@ammonil1261 I don't think so. The ryzen 5 5500 is only$150 Australian and it's a beast
for a new build I'd recommend an am5 build.
Never underestimate a Core i3.
Budget won't ruin your gaming PC. Budget can't really ruin anything if you set the objectives right.
No shit Sherlock, he has the 3060 I wish I could have gotten my hands on. Nvidia being stingy with VRAM ruins your PC, I'd be in an unfortunate situation if I played more graphically intense games
@@pugorilla8848just get one then
â@@pugorilla8848 the 3060 12gb is going around for 280-330$. Id say its a good price for gaming and content creation. Else you woulf wanna get an amd gpu since they are gonna deliver more price to performance in games.
â@@pugorilla8848maybe you can settle on for a radeon gpu that has similar performances?
Besides that gigabyte mobo he got, any gigabyte mobo will ruin your pc. Awful company.
Jesus Christ DO NOT drop the CPU into the socket like he did
That hurt my soul
ikr
people who are stupid enough to take a short at face value deserves what they get. Watch a real video and learn in detail and not be lazy.
â@@thoz6363 ive found that if it doesnt land perfectly the first time you should throw your motherboard like a frisbee a few times. It helps loosen your muscles.
Itâs probably sped up to fit into the short
if it were truly price to performance, there wouldn't be an Nvidia gpu
This is the 30 series, the 75 percentile of the 30 series wasn't very bad, infact it was good at times. 40 series was where it all went downhill and Nvidia will continue to ruin p2p through corporate greed
@@UhmAhctuallythey didnât say the 30 series was bad. They said there wouldnât be an Nvidia gpu if it was price to performance, which is true when AMD shit is cheaper
Considering the a770 just got a price drop to $269 and objectively performs better than a 3060 it probably would've been a better choice.
got some driver problems intel GPUs right now, nvidia ones are more stable
@@NySeeee I'm still rooting for them. They're fixing the big ones
FUCK i bought an a770 for $350
@@NySeeee as an a770 owner, its really not that bad anymore, dont get intel for dx9 games though
Intel gpu driver arenât still mature, so thatâs kinda questionable
What isnât questionable is that 6650xt costs $100 less and performs equally as well if not better
The ARROW LVL: 5
Price in AUD - $1299
Price in USD - $850
Price in Euro - âŹ800
Price in GBP - ÂŁ720
Nice vids
Hi radium pc's! Do you guys ship to europe? since i really want a pc from your shop.
Do you sell it in india
@@roughandrrag i reccommend the ones this guy makeâs especially if you live in usa bc the price of these are really cheap and they have amazing hardware
@Radium PCs i see you have taken inspiration from that dude who asked for the euro price yesterday
Notice how he never even mentioned a price, not even a range of price đ
He made a comment saying the price goofy
I just upgraded to an i5 13400f and a 3060 12gb and its great, now is a good time to build a pc
"Great price to performance" "Best gpu for the mainstream gamer"
So we're just gonna ignore that you can a 6700xt for the price of a 3060, and that it'll destroy anything up to a 3070 in raster performance?
Additionally, you can get 3060 level performance from a rx6600xt which is significantly cheaper than a 3060.
And for all the ppl that will argue: "but muh ray tracing", good luck doing ray tracing on a 3060.
I bought one earlier this year, returned it and got a 6700xt for 50⏠cheaper. Never looked back.
Ppl get too focused on rtx, ignoring that AMD provides better performance for less price. RX 6000 series are not appreciated enough
@@israelsanabria1676 agreed, and it's a fact that nvidia destroys amd in ray tracing. But people forget that 60 series card and even bordering on 70 series cards won't achieve good framerates with it enabled.
@@rFactoRHostageBanger yup, as I said on another comment, if u care too much about ray tracing, well, go to Nvidia. If u don't, then AMD is ur option. In my case, I just want to play, so I got a 6700xt, solid 1080p and 1440p performance while playing
Well in my countryâs market 6700xt cost 120 dollars more so 3060 is perfect choice
6700xt is is 100 more expensive what is blud waffling about
lets make a budget pc
proceed to slap a 500$ gpu in the case
Unless you get the best 3060 out there, a 3060 is not for 500$ more like 370$
Yeah I got mine for 350 dollars
they literally go for 200 on ebay lmao
NEVER BUY A PC FROM SOMEONE WHO USES POWER TOOLS TO BUILD IT
it says a lot about effort if you won't use a screwdriver instead of a drill for such short screws.
it's a lot faster and much more intuitive.
true story
agree. maybe he just builds a lot
There are specialized power tools for PC building. They have very very low torque settings so you don't over tighten anything. Kinda like how a normal drill will start to ratchet if it experiences too much resistance.
@@Maggot00679 you're thinking of an impact driver not a regular drill and the "ratcheting" is the impacts that drive the screws further in.
so really you're thinking of a torque wrench.
Price to performance you canât have Nvidia in that đ
Yes you can!!!
@@shanestrains548 lmao no
@@nullpro7435 YES YOU CAN RTX 3060 Ti Pulling 160fps in GTA V on ultra settings on 1080p for $270
â@@shanestrains548 you can't get a new 3060ti for that money
@@shanestrains5482013 year game, nice man
You broke the bank with the first 3 pieces..lol
Same for me lmaođđ
It was the 3060 for me â ïž
This build is similar to mine except my GPU got Nvidia's greed-treatment though it costed 140 less, it's price to performance and efficiency isn't as good as 3060's.
âBudgetâ yet bro is using a Nvidia card
Bro can build an entire house of RTX boxes if he want
watching u guys have gaming pc while i only have dell working pc ;--;
Just got my custom build finished today ryzen 7 5800x3d, ventus 3x 4070, vengance pro ddr4 ram 32gigs, msi mag b550 tomahawk corsair 4000D airflow, arctic liquid freezer 240, sp120mm fans, and an hp reverb g2 for just over 2 grand and i couldnt be happier with it
This mf is the type of guy who will say âguys i am laggingâ when he dies in the game
Best price to performance but they used a 3060 over a RX 6600XT.
ngl amd has alot of driver issues
@@captainvenom4377 not really
@@captainvenom4377 What issues? People just can't admit that Nvidia is money milking machine that is literally stealing money from it's customers. Amd destroys Nvidia in budget GPUs. 3060 is currently 100$ more expensive than 6600xt while being slower card. Nvidia's only advantage is ray tracing which is useless on budget cards, the only price/performance card that is reasonable from Nvidia is 4090.
â@@captainvenom4377no amd drivers are insane and easy to use đ
My mans got hamza late night playing in background, real g.
Ay thatâs basically my exact build except Iâm waiting for my 3060 rn
As someone who has used a 3060:
Fortnite: 100-150 FPS Max Settings, 1440p
Minecraft Bedrock: 400-600 FPS Max Settings, 1440p
Apex Legends: 100-200 FPS Max Settings, 1440p
CPU: Intel Core i5 10600K
RAM: 64 GB (4 x 16 GB) DDR4
I have exact same specs and it is value fir money
no it doesnt, any nvidia gpu that is a 3000 series is a trash gpu when compared to amd, he could have gotten a 6700xt or maybe a 6750xt for the same price as the 3060, and gotten much more fps and much more power. Also even the 6600 xt which is under 300 dollars is faster than a 3060, and at warzone a 6600 is probably faster because nvidia cards suck at warzone, their drivers arent the best and even a 6600 which is like 200 dollars would get more fps than a 3060
â@@RamSVermaOfficial bro just admit you are a hardcore AMD supporter. I owned rtx 3050 and 3070 from the rtx series and an AMD Rx 6600xt, after all this time using it and running shit, the rtx is just better
@@tronroom8084 Hardcore AMD supporter when i own a gtx 1650, owned 3050, 3060, and 3070, currently on 3060 and never used a AMD card once in my life, or a amd CPU. Thats amazing!
@@tronroom8084 So thats all you got "rtx is just better" Also its better for me because I stream and edit vids. But in gaming the rx is better in raw performance. RTX 3060 is currently the most popular good card right now, I understand but what if you don't want a 3060 and want more performance? or have a cheaper budget. AMD wins in that, the rx 6600 on 200, 6750 at 400, close to rtx 3070 performance. Now ofc this is for gamers. this comment was a month ago, tbh I have changed sides now, and I'm just giving reasons why amd is better. I can give reasons why nvidia is better but my topic isn't about it so no. But all you said was about you owning a 3050 and 3070, and a 6600, then saying rtx is just better. Without any reason why. Also a 3050 is literally trash. Slower than a 2060, and in laptop versions they only have 4gb vram. They are trash.
â@@tronroom8084 it really is better? Still not enough to convince me to upgrade to RTX 4000 card, Nvidia giving bad prices and low vram. Ill stick with my rtx 3000 card until Nvidia improves or Intel drops a good battlemage series lineup
my 8700k is sweating rn
Meanwhile rx 6650 xt and arc a770 : am i a joke to you ?
You can also use Intel ARC A750 GPU similar performance to 3060 and 100$ cheap.
And be unable to run any good games
@@pavletrnic1433 The performace of A750 is similar to RTX 3060 and Radeon 6600XT
Multiple games run on it at good fps on 1080p.
â@@pavletrnic1433 this comment shows how ignorant you are, driver updates have rolled out and it now has direct x to vulcan translators
And also have massive driver issues! Maybe next gen đ
@@goddammit Yea I accept that before December Intel ARC was the worst graphics card coz of FPS drops and currently I am using this GPU in my gaming PC. After the recently update it almost solved all the FPS Drops issues which made it beat 3060.
Stop saying it's gaming performance is better than the i7 10700. The i7 has twice the cinebench scores and all modern games can utilize all 8 cores. The i3 has slightly better single core performance but the multi core is nearly HALF of the i7.
This is misleading to people, making them think they got an equivalent high end cpu from just a couple generations ago for an amazing price, when in reality they got half of that for the price of the lowest end I series cpu that's sold.
fr
Not totally... You should do your research even deeply, I myself am a pc specialist so I know stuff more.
@Tron room you are not a pc specialist. I did my research, not like I even had to from what I know.
The new i3 has slightly higher single core performance. The i7 has nearly twice as much multi core performance. Its faster in applications that only use 1 core (no modern applications use only 1 core). Games are multi threaded, so they can easily utilize up to 16, some even 32 cores.
I3 is faster in single core, i7 is faster in multi core, games are not single core, they are multi core, end of story.
The i7 could handle twice the fps before getting bottlenecked.
This pc is a scam, the price is a scam, the performance claims are a scam, the marketing is a scam.
The whole operation is a SCAM.
@andreamaral9725 the multicore is almost twice as much. I don't get my information anywhere, I do benchmarks and I compare the numbers, game are multicore applications that can use well over the 8 available cores on such cpus.
Games don't benefit from single core. They are multi core workloads.
@andreamaral9725 it's not twice as much but it'd nearly twice as much. Last I checked the single core is only 3% higher, which is 12% if your comparing 4 cores to 4 cores, but the i7 has twice the amount of cores. Your single core bump only matters when you have the same or more cores as another cpu. Every single game since around 2008 has been able to use 8 cores. Modern games from around 2015 and on can use 20.
I'm not wrong. Single core only matters when you are comparing cpus that have the same core count. The i3 is 4 cores. The i7 is 8 cores.
It DOES perform better in all games, even excluding the fact it has extra power to keep background processes from stealing the cpu from games, because it has MORE CORES and MORE THREADS.
Look at cinebench r23 scores for the cpus. The i7 is faster in all core workloads like gaming, rendering, encoding, compiling, etc. You can often find the i7 for cheap.
It's absolutely pathetic that you've let some youtuber gaslight you into thinking a ever so slightly newer i3 performs better than a ever so slightly older i7. It doesn't. You are living a lie.
Me realizing my Geforce rtx 3060 wasnât the best lowest price gpu i could find: âŠâŠ.
mine is 1 year old , and it was the best budget out there , great combo.
Would've used the 6650xt, better price to performance. At least the euro region.
True, raytracing on RX and rtx is Trash but the clock Speed in RX is alot more
@@Alex-fu2mr wdym raytracing is trash on rtx cards? its legit made for raytracing.
â@@Alex-fu2mrWhy does the clockspeed even matter between 2 different cards, it's not something comparable nor an argument for which card is better
â@@Rougecombecause it is trash. Just because it has tensor cores doesn't mean that it can run ray tracing just like the 3090 or any high end card can, use some logic.
Niiice you actually replaced the 5600
Painter: Which color you want the wall to be?
Him: Rtx
Bro an i3 faster than my i7 860 and my hd7860 đđđ
Just dont listen to someone that has only nvidia on their shelf. They dont know what they are doing. Most of them.
Stay away from any builders that drop a CPU in like they did in this vid.
I love it when they invent names for a pc
i3 and a 3060 man this guy must be joking
ĐĐŸĐșŃĐŸĐČŃĐč ĐșŃĐ»Đ”Ń ĐœĐŸŃŃŃđ
They be using that cheap a$$ Kingston ssd from their top of the line god tier builds to the bottom of the barrel i3 builds lol
That's always how system builders increase their profit margins, compromise on anything that isn't the CPU or GPU
Finally it's not the 6500xt
I love how u do Intel in most of the builds
Sure it'll get 120 but not 100% of the time on max settings
it definitely cannot, round probably 40
@@jaysen5949 60-85 fps đą
@@jaysen5949 Nah better than 40. Even my 2080 Super has a low of like 70-80
@@jaysen5949 i get 40 fps in 4k max settings without dlss (60+ with dlss)
@@jaysen5949 it gets 90+ all of the time
Are you joking
I have an i5 12400f and an rtx 3060 12gb
16 gb ddr4 3600 mhz RAM
I get maximum 80 fps on warzone 2.0 max settings 1080p
wdym 120 fps?!
You should be getting more than that, are your drivers updated?
DLSS?
â@Radium PCs I mean, Warzone 2 is so unoptimized it performs inconsistently with any and all setups
I have the exact same build i was wondering what fps i would get on warzone 2.0 if i install. Did you overclock your gpu or is it idle?
â@@radiumpcs3235 super unoptimized game.
This is... literally my pc
i cant believe i seriously gamed on an i3 9100f and i7 4770, in that order
It does annoy me that people decide what the performance of a cpu is by what 'i' it is. I bet some people would take an i7 950 over that i3...
No they wouldnât
Thatâs the whole point of the naming scheme
Im thinking of getting this
â@David Boscanin bru the i3 is in toe with a r9 5950x with single core. while having more chache, PCIE 5.0 compared to the 5500 3.0 and the i3 runs at lower watts and support for ddr5 all while being what? 20 bucks more
Bro I love your uploads, i want to get into pc building but as a job since it's my hobby got any tips?
i had a 3060 and a i5 11400 with 16 gigs of carsair ram and it was clocked to 3200 MHz and at 1080p i could only get 90 fps on medium settings and being upscaled with dlss set to balanced at 1440p medium settings dlss set to balanced i got 75 to 80 fps but never 100 fps so this is lies the 3060 is a decent card not gonna lie but it wont get 120 fps on warzone 2
I remember the days when the top cpus were just 4 cores, cause if they punch hard thatâs all you need! People recommending 8 cores for gaming rigs are wasting money
*GTX 1070 Super laughing menacingly: âIâm not just better, I AM THE WHOLE INDUSTRY OF THE BEST CARDSâ*
What is this elusive 1070 super đ€Ł and I know you aren't talking about the slower, less vram, and less power efficient 2070 super.
@@yeetus59 ah you see, the 1070 is really powerful, better than the GTX1650
Is it?
Incomprehensible comment
Rx 6600xt: exist
"yeAh BUt iTs AmD"
i built one almost the exact same as this, i just went with the 13100f as at the time it was on sale for the same price as the 12100f
Bro really just used an nvidia card in a âbest price to performanceâ build lol
Nvidia is more like price to multi task lol
bro you should've gotten the and radeon RX6650 XT because amd is WAYYYY better for gaming
âŠ
R5 5600 + RX 6600 would be a better choice imo
So true.
Or even with the 3060. The 5600 isn't underpowered for it unlike the 12100F
@@Zebra_Paw Of course, you're getting more cores and threads with the 5600, unlike the 12100F, or even a 13100F. But I would go for a 6600 instead of a 3060. Just because of it's price to performance ratio. RX 6600 costs like 240$ in my country, while the 3060 costs like 360$ and up. But the performance is similar when it comes to gaming, but if you wanna do some productivity aswell, then 3060 is better. A770 or A750 performs good too, but they're still kind of unstable.
@@thedecoder0 yeah I'm really not a fan of Intel Arc.
RX 6600 is a very good idea, but the 3060 is definitely not a bad card
@@Zebra_Paw I personally own two cards. A 3060 and a 3080 Ti. And I can guarantee you that 3060 isn't a bad card. It's just the price tag what gives it a bad price to performance ratio. But if you really want that 4 GB extra vram, then 3060 is a much better choice. Other than that, 6600 any day. Sadly that 3060 8 GB is nothing but a gimmick. It's pretty much a renamed 3050 Ti. Just a waste of money. And even now, I will recommend the 3060 or RX 6600 over the new 4060 and 4060 Ti's. They're not worth the money.
@@thedecoder0 yes I don't like the 4000 series either.
I just checked prices on the 3060 and wow they are still much higher than I thought, so yes, probably go AMD or buy used at this price point
I would LOVE to see that setup get 120 FPS on Warzone đđđ
It can
easily
Rtx 3060 just hits the sweet spot.
I build my new pc this year with i5 12400F and RX6700xt(which I brought for 350$ in my case it's cheaper than 3060 which is 470 $) so far I'm really happy with performance
Yoi did the right choice. 6700xt is 20%+ faster than filthy 8gb 3060
Is there any driver issues and other issues cz im planning to buy the same build with either rtx 3060 or rx6700xt but Iâm afraid to buy rx since ma y people say it has issues and idk what .. please be honest
@@BambooAgeShorts I have been using rx6700xt since January this year every game runs smooth this far no issue of overheating or driver issues (I brought the asrock phantom gaming rx6700xt because it was somehow cheaper than the asus one with 2 fans) the card looks cool and I'm getting more fps with less money
@@BambooAgeShorts I'd say buy rx6700xt and save money on GPU and buy a good pair of ram/ a good NVMeSSD
@@dio-sama5620 ok thank you đIâll definitely buy the rx
I wouldn't call the 3060 a good price to performance card. Even a 6600xt/6650xt would be better value aka cheaper and would provide way better performance than the 3060. Too bad people buy for the brand, not for the performance and this shop doesn't help to change that mindset. đ
Also 120fps average on max settings on warzone 2? I seriously doubt that.
Its for the realtime ray tracing, path tracing and dlls
â@@YumeCanPvp if you want ray tracing then don't get a 3060 it's just not powerful enough
@@vojtechjersak4618 then what gpu do u recommend for ray tracing?
@@YumeCanPvp Lmao, good luck running pathtracing on a 3060 đ€Łđ€Łđ€ŁIt's actually funny how many people Nvidia has fooled into believing that raytracing is a viable feature for the majority of gamers.
Iâm an intel die hard fan but talking about price to performance then an AMD build really win here.
6600xt is on par with 3060 while being cheaper
Isn't AMD dealing with driver issues again? This time it's actually damaging 6000 series cards.... You get what you pay for and when you buy the cheaper product, you get the cheaper product.
@@AtteroDominatus nope all the drivers are working perfectly fine and in the moment amd has so much better price to performance then nvidia
@@reaperthehell1951 you want to bet some money on this?. Should I also mention the 7000 series cards having heatsink issues?
@@reaperthehell1951 there's a link to jaystwocents. czcams.com/video/W8mlb19w0e0/video.html
â@@AtteroDominatus and some nvidia rtx 40 had and still have problems burning his own power cables? Like like they said 6000 had no problem with drivers right now having a 6600xt with out any issue
These cpus are quite powerful as there's always a bottleneck where the GPU is weaker than the CPU so the GPU has to work harder so it can use its full potential so the core i3 is perfect with this
what is the background music? ps love your pc's cant wait to buy
Does a price to performance build without showing the prices...
i sometimes ask my brother the game spec requirements but then i remember he has a 3070 ti and can run anything bruh
try for amd GPUs.
they beat price to performance if you include rtx, but you can also get much better price to performance if you ignore rtx.
@@simonhoel2704 yes but only if you dont get rtx gpus which i do
The i3 will be horrible for productivity and streaming, 4 cores and 8 threads wonât be good enough
Literally beat i7-10th gen tho research before spreading liesđ lol
Pre Built Gaming PC idk where it said work station in the title
@@mrcooshie8436 he said productivity not gaming because gaming you dont benefit a lot from core counts. 4C/8T vs 8C/16T is a massive difference in multi core applications
@@narwhal9852 in cinebench r23, i3 gets 8k and i7 gets 12k in multi core result
3060 has NVENC lol
Inshallah mai kharidu gaa yaa inshallahđđ
i3 12100F just 100-110 Usd in my country. Best price/performance cpu for gaming.
I wouldâve picked the i5 13th gen for about 40$ more you get about 30-40 more fps in wz2
Thats the exact combo I have
13th gen i5 and the 12gb version of the 3060
I went with 32gb DDR5 6400 G.Skill RGB RAM, an AIO watercooler for the CPU, and some other goodies
Full Tower case, NVMe M.2 boot drive, a 4tb HDD for backups and storage, and a Corsair 1000w fully modular power supply 80+ Gold rated
My PC cost around $1600 for everything...and it has enough RGB to make a clown blush đđđ
â@@dustinodunne3572sounds nice but def not a budget build at1600 (USD?) A 3060 is going to bottleneck you with a 13th gen I5 and 1000watts is way over your requirements. Good news is you're ready to upgrade to a 3090/6900xt++ with that PSU
@@natheayn6111 thats the plan!!! I just couldnt afford a 3090 at the same time as everything else đ€Łđ€Ł 3060 was the best I could get. Im not really planning on using it for gaming though, Im using it for cracking hashes and brute forcing logins. Im in training to become an Ethical Hacker...so the 12gb of VRAM of the 3060 Twin Edge was a better call for me starting off than anything else. I believe the 3090, 4080, and 4090 are the only Nvidia cards with more VRAM. Im not sure about AMDs cards though. I might upgrade to one of theirs next, because theyve open sourced their drivers for use in Linux
@@natheayn6111 yeah, I looked into it, and the AMD 6800 XT and better are the only AMD cards with more than 12gb of VRAM. Also, the 6800 XT is like $160 more than the 3060 was when I bought it 2 months ago. So I couldnt have afforded it
I had a set budget of $2000, and needed an entire setup, including monitor, mouse, and keyboard (and stupid state sales taxes đźâđš)
I had to be frugal and get the best bang for my buck. I appreciate your suggestions though!!! Thank you!!
Bad GPU choice. The 6600XT is much better for less price.
The 3060 is horrendous in price/performance. It's not even good enough in raytracing, and DLSS isn't very useful at 1080p.
But not so many games support AMD GPUs games are designed that they give smooth and stable performance with NVIDIA GPUs
Bro seriously said with i3 core he can give 120 fps on cod
That CPU install gave me acid reflux
Ok how can this do 120fps on mw2 with max setting but I have a 3060 ti and a 5600x yet I do high settings and only get about 110
3060ti has 8gb vram maybe that's the cause
what's crazy is that I was going to get this PC but I got a "no" from every single member of my family
Why tho? I mean if it's your money go for it
bro i have the same problem with you,but my family forbid me to buy gaming cpu
it's only a problem if you're using their money. If not, then why care about their opinion
pay for it yourself and they canât complain
Thanks for the suggestion y'all
I already asked to use my own money, still got a no
And eventually got over it realizing maybe it's for the best
Love you guys work đnever disappointed đđđ
GASP! DID YOU REALLY JUST INSULT MY CPU???!!?
Nah it isnât true the i7 10700 has much more cores and its faster maybe the i3 12100f has 1fps more or something
most games can run well on 8 threads, but when streaming or adobe software does not
Look bro i7 10th gen is overall slower compared to the I3 10100f.
I feel like that 3060 is getting severely bottlenecked
Nah itâs fine, the i3 is basically a 9700k-9900k
Bro that was an 8GB RTX 3060 đ
Yeh the 12 gig version was retarded. Itâs always been an 8 gig card performance-wise. The processing power wouldnât be able to keep up with the vram usage at higher resolution. Pointless. Just get the 8 gif version.
I feel so good about myself right now
I think a ryzen 5 5600x paired with an rx 6600 and 16gb of ram would be a lot better in terms of price to performance
That's true, the 12100F is only a quad core, which struggles for modern games.
You can even cut it down to an R5 5500 and it will still be better
I would go with the 6650 or 6700 for that price
We also have an RX 6700 Pre-Built PC for this price! đ
Unless you are playing game that AMD doesn't work on đ. 3060ti good card too
@@milescarter7803 3060 to is a beast I got it
â@@milescarter7803 ll there is no such game which runs in nvidea but doesn't in and card
â@@milescarter7803AMD works on all games
Wow. What a gorgeous PC!
Budget? That seems expensive
Do you hate amd cards or you are not sponsored by them cause rx 6600 xt just slams the 3060 by fair margin
they make multiple vids with amd cards wdym
I feel sorry for people buying 3060 gpu
Just buy an old gtx1080 and be happy
If ur gunna buy a garbage card might aswell buy used card for 1/4 the price
Imagine buying a 13100F when you can buy a 5600 for the same price and better performance. Talking about "price to performance"
Of course a chip 3 generations later will have better performance than the 10th gen chips that's how that works
the i3 only has 4 cores tho... đ
SoâŠđ this is gaming and i3-12th gen beat a I7 12 gen in gaming
I meant i7-10th
@@mrcooshie8436 yes
He is talking about performance not cores my man đ
@@flyingbird5449 performance is also about cores you bozo
"Not breaking the bank" đđđ this is expensive
Did he really just say i3 is better than an i7
For gaming it would be
Perfect, this should get me a full 20 fps in starfield
DO NOT BUY THE 3060 get the 6650 XT same price, better proformence.
DLSSâŠ..
Yes mom , this pc can handle my online class đ
Okay i am convinced i will never change my i3-12100f until failure
That graphics card sells for 389-399. For 385 you can get an RX 6750 with 12GB of RAM on Newegg.
We need to stop brainwashing gamers that don't know better into thinking NVIDIA is their only option.
amd doesn't have dlss. DLSS is a massive upgrade from fsr so nvidia is basically the best choice. Even if and performs better in raw performance, dlss is just such an important utility that going for nvidia is objectively the better choice. And if u can afford a 40 series that has frame generation, there's obviously no argument for amd.
@@ashenzenden No they don't have DLSS. They have FSR that is now up to FSR 2.1 and bey close in quality. AMD is soon to release FSR 3 and it will add frames just like DLSS 3 but you won't need special ridiculously overpriced hardware to use it (4000 series cards only). There obviously is an argument or you wouldn't have replied. Look in videos just bullying us and people like you are letting them get away with it get a freaking education on hardware and realize you have choices. It's because of people like you the hardware prices have stayed so damn high.
INVIDES will break, they've essentially tripled the price of graphics cards over the past couple of years because of the mining craze and COVID. The mining craze is gone and the only market they have left is gamers. They have pissed most of us off to the point where we don't want anything to do with them I will not touch an Nvidia card until the price comes down to something reasonable. I have no tolerance for getting bullied into paying three times the amount a card is actually worth.
I really belive the rtx 3060 is the new 1660
120 fps, max settings and of course DLSS: High performance