5 Logical Puzzles That'll Take Time to Crack
Vložit
- čas přidán 16. 08. 2024
- Test your logical skills with these tricky brainteasers. Only the smartest people can solve these mind-blowing puzzles. These brainteasers would be easy and straightforward if it weren't for all the conditions you have to take into account so that they don't contradict each other. Are you ready for the challenge?
TIMESTAMPS
True colors 0:20
Magical land 1:43
A strict king and a clever merchant 3:03
Who’s the murderer 4:44
Which box is the toy car in? 6:42
SUMMARY
-Can you figure out what color shirt each man is wearing?
-How many lions and sheep will you find when you come back if you leave the animals alone for some time?
-Figure out how did the merchant manage to escape without being killed by the sharpshooter.
-You have 20 seconds to solve the murder case.
-Find the toy car in one of the 3 boxes.
Subscribe to Bright Side : goo.gl/rQTJZz
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Our Social Media:
Facebook: / brightside
Instagram: / brightgram
5-Minute Crafts CZcams: www.goo.gl/8JVmuC
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
For more videos and articles visit:
www.brightside.me/ - Jak na to + styl
TIMESTAMPS
True colors 0:20
Magical land 1:43
A strict king and a clever merchant 3:03
Who’s the murderer 4:44
Which box is the toy car in? 6:42
The bow was number 3 i knew it!!!
Box****
BRIGHT SIDE and
9 truo 3
alllllll........
#2 is so dumb how can you just “figure out” that lions would understand the consequences
Exactly. I thought there would be 11 sheep in the end, 10 of which would be dead.
Yeah one would think that but it said in the beginning that they were “intelligent and rational”
Cyndi Garcia at least one person in this convo is smart. I assumed it would've been 1 sheep and 10 lions.
I agree, but for a different reason. The infographic intentionally lead us down the garden path.
They are magical!!!! , he said
Riddle two: Any answer is correct, as long as there is a magical power that you can explain your answer with.
Dozo G i
Dozo G the lions wanted to become sheeps
The lions weren't together.
the sheep bit the lion
All the lions did bite the sheep at the same time? Since they figured out that all the other lions would go for the lonely sheep, and they didnt want to be without a bite.
logic would not prevent the lions from eating after seeing one eat the sheep and turning even if they saw the feeding -- no where does it say that the rest of the lions were watching when the first one ate nor does it state that the rest of the lions wanted to be the king of the jungle.
Exactly. And what if I decided to separate the sheep and lions by USING LOGIC.
By the same logic a lion would be safe if he ate a sheep since the other lions didn't want the same fate....
rericks the nerd the Lions would starve if they didn't eat a sheep
In some places lions are king of the Jungle but not everywhere. Some areas Elephants are.
Nor does it state that the rest don't wamt to be turned into sheep
2nd puzzle requires an understanding of motivation not presented to solve. I can't know that the lions don't want to be lions until you tell me.
They were described as highly intelligent. Thats your motivation. You are inserting bias.
@@commenteroftruth9790 Maybe they were so intelligent they understood lions have an insanely higher basal metabolic rate than sheep, which leads to them constantly being under pressure to hunt. Where as sheep, as unintelligent as they are, are given food and shelter by the sheppard, and therefore, they long to become the sheep
@@jacobrichardson5018 knowledge and intelligence are different things. You shouldnt need to know the deeper biology or hunting habits of a lion for a riddle.
That was a riddle rather than puzzle
The only really logical puzzles are the "True colors" and the "Box with the toy car".
The "Who's the murderer" doesn't tell you that Michael is the one killed.
The other ones rely on nonsense ("Lions and magic", "A bridge guarded 24/7 and well lit...")
So a rational being would starve instead of turn into a sheep?
GameWorks12 That's what the Devil would have you believe...
Tim Owen so the person who made this video is.... him?
Ghost Angel No but every human can be influenced by the Devil. Have you ever seen the news?
If any lion ate the sheep due to hunger, he would transform into a sheep too, and this cycle would repeat itself over and over again until only 1 sheep is left alive (and 10 dead sheep)
This question doesn't really make much sense in the long run xD
@@jax8668 yep, end answer is 1 sheep. Of course if you came back before the end, you would have 1 sheep any number 1 to 10 lions depending on when you returned.
There once lived a very strict king
Me: 1. he looks like a 5 year old 2. He looks very friendly
Me.. Is he kimjungu (however his name is spelled)
Kim jong un
Well, the lions would starve to death, so eventually there Will be 1 sheep 0 lions
Melis Derveni nope 2 sheep and 0 lion because first one of lions must eat in order to be lesson for others 😁
Black [B] it would eat the sheep, making it the only sheep
Hey guys! Did you solve at least one riddles? Who solved all of them?
2
I answered the second one NONE cause if they eat each other there will be none of them
1 😣😣😣
The one in the thumbnail
I couldn't.. Plz give some easy puzzles only the 99% cn solve😂😂😂
#3: you clearly said “no citizen is allowed to leave” so does that mean the merchant isn’t a citizen? It’s smart, but choose your words wisely or else the riddle is LITERALLY impossible.
Unless there are multiple people with amputated legs in that room, why would the detective need multiple clues beyond "the murderer underwent a leg amputation a month ago" to figure out who the murderer was?
#2 is more of a riddle than a logic puzzle. interestingly #4 also has more than one way to reach the conclusion, for instance michael couldn't be the murderers brother, since he lived in a rural area and jack and his brother grew up in chicago
That is the way to go!!! He is even wrong in the video with his interpretation that Michael is dead and Jeffrey alive.. Assuming that Jeffrey killed Micheal but he forgot that both Micheal and Jeffrey can be alive and that one of the 2 Marathon runners is murdered..
Also I think that none of them are the murderer because it said that the murderer had gone to jail
@@waternelon213 it's says before moving to the city...
No, you make the assumption that he was living in a rural area before moving to the city. He could have just been living in a suburban house far from the city and wanted to practice farming.
In number 4, I was able to follow the logic about who the murderer was, but I can't figure out what logic was used to determine that Michael was dead. By my logic it could be either Michael or Damian that could be the victims and there's nothing in those statements that could narrow that down.
#2: 2 sheeps (1 dead + 1 alive) and 9 lions, unless 1 or some af the 9 lions wants to be a sheep
#4: Amputees do run marathons (www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-4422126/Marine-amputee-runs-Boston-Marathon-American-flag.html), not everybody runs to win, some do others reasons like support for a cause, training for ironman or just to be able to tell themself "I did a marathon".
Damien was the killer. He had a prosthetic leg when he ran the marathon. It also said that he was with "one of the innocent people in the group" you could imply that he isn't innocent because it doesn't say "another innocent"
No.4 can be done in two other ways if I'm correct. Other way 1: say to Jack who his brother is, he is in isolation so he should break after awhile. Other way 2: if the murderer got a leg amputation we could look through all the hospitals in the town looking for Jack's last name because they're brothers until they find the murderer's name.
Third way: look at their legs.
The Melon God yeah really that’s what I was thinking
Trent Lindsey that was my exact thought and idea to solve it lol
Not to mention that the one with one leg is discriminated against. It's only logical if you assume he wouldn't run a marathon.
0:53 figured it out as you were speaking. Mr. Blue is wearing red. Mr. White is wearing blue. And Mr. Red is obviously wearing white.
or you could do it like this the text balloon from the guy in the middle says: Mr Blue, you're right. Giving us a hint that Mr. Blue is on the right side from the middle guy.. which is the one with the red shirt.. then the other 2 are obvious..
#4 You came to the right conclusion but by the wrong means. Micheal is not the killer but not because Jeffrey plans on building a computer with Ben but because the killer grew up in Chicago with Jack and Michael was considering becoming a farmer before moving to the city which means he didn't grew up in the city.
Like the rest of the comments said riddle #2 is incorrect. If ALL the animals are intelligent and rational then multiple answers could occur. They could rationalize to share the sheep eating it simultaneously, the sheep could bargain with the lions to not eat it at all and become herbivore (remember Narnia is a magical place), or none of them could eat the sheep and they decide to eat the guy watching all them YOU.
He went under the bridge?
Or swam...
Or killed the sharpshooter...
Or bribed the sharpshooter...
The way Problem #5 was stated was rather confusing. Might've been better to label the boxes with 1,2,3 and the assertions with A,B,C. At first, it kind of sounded like there was some connection between each box and assertion.
That merchant who crossed the bridge without documentation was GENIUS 😂🤣😂🤣
COULDN'T HAVE SOLVED THAT MYSTERY EVEN AFTER MONTHS!!!
NICE VIDEO
He could have just NOT crossed the bridge.
Riddle: A man enters a shop, wants to return some items, but is declined cuz he doesn't have the receipt and left the shop with the items. The thing is that he had the same amount of money before and after getting those items. How did he do that?
Answer: he just took, them, pretended to own them and got out of there
#3 The guard knew that the King would not want anyone in the town who ran that way.
The last one was the easiest one.
The murderer is Jack's brother. Got that wrong.
This is not what logic is. This is what a nine-year-old thinks logic is.
In the magical land of Narnia... All moose/reindeers wear sunglasses, mustaches, and dress shirts with a tie
Last one:
Box 1: said had toy car in it
Box 2: said didn’t have you car in it
Box 3: said Box 1 had no toy in it
Box 3 said Box 1 had no toy in it, excluding Box 1
Box 2 said there was no toy inside
The answer must be Box 3, because none of the boxes said Box three had the toy inside.
Lucario Gamer yeah I agree. I don’t like that question because of the answer.
That’s not the Riddle works. He said that only one of the boxes is telling the truth and the one that is telling the truth is box 3, but since the other two are lying and box 2 said it isn’t in there he is lying and the car is there
Exactly.
Dosen't matter because it said that it was in box one; correct answers: either box one or three
But the riddle says that only 1 of the boxes is telling the truth. If box 3 has the toy, then boxes 2 and 3 are telling the truth. That breaks one of the riddle's rules. If it were in Box 2, then only Box 3 would be telling the truth.
#2: what if the lions have memory loss or are hungry af, you can't chuck in "oh they are smart" into the equation
1. Easy, you just need to use a table.
2. Also easy, because the lions will know the consequences. Only 9 lions and 2 sheep.
3. Oh…
4. This was hard.
5. Easy.
for the lion one; its dumb
the answer SHOULD be 1 sheep, since if every lion ate a sheep and became a sheep that would leave one left, since the others are eaten
The first one is funny because it literally tells you the answer as it's giving the riddle. "Mr. Blue, Mr. Red, and Mr. White, who all want to be the French flag" like,,, he names them in order.
For no.3, I thought the merchant sold a fake watch that had a minute hand that moved slow.
I thought he either killed or bribed the sharpshooter.
And I though he wasn't a citizen of that city, so he could freely go home, as the prohibition were only for citizens
I thought the merchant was also the sharpshooter
1: Blue, red, white
2: 11 sheep, 0 lions ohhhhhh
3:He went on a boat under the bridge oh aokee
4:Damian??? Umm, someone can still run a marathon with one leg
5: Box 2
Narnia is a magical land where all animals live in peace with eachother. Lions would not be eating sheep in the first place.
I Solved 3! Did My Hardwork To Solve It! (Atleast I Tried My Best! :D)
The clever merchant could of swam
He could have swum across, not could of.
*If he was a clever merchant that would mean he is most likely rich and could've have bribed the guard or escaped at a winter night so it's really dark and the guard probably couldn't see him. The merchant could've also just swam over the river or called someone outside the city and asked someone to pick him up, there are too many ways you could solve this but yeah... they went with the weirdest one imo. He could've also killed the guard or make up a distraction inside the city near the walls or something.*
Caspersreunite Bravo👏
MsBettyR. He could’ve swam across, not swum.
I figured he would have either gone under the bridge where the guard couldn't see him, or the complete other side of the wall where again, the guard couldn't see him, because the ONE guard is keeping an eye on the bridge, so therefore the far side of the town would be unguarded.
Riddles where the answer is whatever the person wants them to be. Can’t run a marathon with one leg....tell that to all the one-legged marathon runners.
7:48 Ironic how the only one saying they didn’t have it, had it
*HEYYYYY ☺️I wanted to wish everyone here a wonderful day today full of happiness! Don't forget to smile and BE AWESOME 😍💕*
-love from a hungry youtuber in Hungary trying to reach 10k! 🙈💕
❤️
Kasey Chen love your channel!
Kasey Chen - I’m smiling because of you
Wow I love you channel tooo
My existence is pain
😂 these puzzles are so confusing like my chemistry book
Writer's pouch what grade chemistry?
i got A+ 😂 by mistake
Writer's pouch please tell me you’re joking and aren’t really this dense, please.
My Argument for your second one - Since all animals are rational, and the Lion their King, NO LION WOULD EAT THE SHEEP IN THE FIRST PLACE, as THEY ALREADY KNOW THAT IS GOING TO TURN THEM TO SHEEP.
Why is Jeffrey the murderer? That's my name! You should have made up names, like, Kiki, and Fretty, and Oppoli, and Jammey, and Sewew.
I stopped at question #2. In the presentation of the riddle, you showed continuous gobbling of lion-turned sheep. Now the deciding answer to the riddle is when will it all stop? And I don;t think it is logical to conclude that lions don't want to become sheep if they are intelligent.
The lions would know after the first, that if they became sheep, the other lions might eat them.
I'm the 1000th comment :D
I FEEL SO SPECIAL
also I want nothing I'm just stating facts =)
XD
Lol my solution for #4 was a lot darker:
I thought that Michael was the murderer and Jack was the murdered. You technically ARE in isolation if you're 6 feet under and you need both your legs to run a farm, which Michael was going to do but decided not to. I figured the murderer would be in jail so I thought it couldn't have been Jeffery or Benedict because Jeffery planned to make a computer for Benedict next week, and one of the facts said that they had constructed their last computers together. I just assumed the two computers were the same... XD And like the video said, you need both your legs to run a marathon, so it couldn't have been Damian.
For number 3 there are 2 ways!
1. The way they did
2. He can walk for 5 mins an the duck under the bridge and then when he goes inside and walk the rest of the way
How do we know who died in the 4th night one, you never say
The2kGod Raah it killer can be michael too. Or damian could be killed
Michael can't be the killer because he had been wanting to be a farmer BEFORE moving to the city. Meanwhile Jacks brother is the killer, his brother whom he had grown up with in chicago.
I legit did a whole grid of possibilities for that one and the only logical conclusion i came to was jeff being the killer, everyone else had reasons as to why they COULDNT be the killer.
What is the reason for Damien not being the victim?
Mahissimo that's my very question also! I believe the uploader haven't paid attention to that
He mistook potential killers for potential victims
I also believe that, originally, this riddle was meant to be that as the killer grew up in Chicago, he wouldn't be the type of guy that would consider becoming a farmer (Michael's description), but even that explanation is kind of lame..
Michael moved to a city. So he didn’t grow up there.
The murderer misses a leg. Most marathons can’t be runs by somebody with one leg. No matter if he has a fake leg
Except marathons HAVE been run by people with one leg, meaning Damian is can not be excluded.
For #3 don't merchants have to go outside to TRADE WITH PEOPLE!!!!!
2: wanting to be a lion is not "rational", it's an aesthetic choice
The #2 solution is not the intended one. It makes it look like you copied this riddle without reading the answer thoroughly. It is clear Bright Side has never read The Chronicles of Narnia before.
This is a classic game theory problem where the endgame can determine whether the first sheep is eaten.
Assuming all lions are rational and know that all other lions are also rational:
If there is 1 lion, then it will obviously just eat the sheep.
If there are 2 lions, then neither lion will eat the sheep as the other lion will just eat it afterwards.
If there are 3 lions, then the first lion to get to the sheep will eat it, reducing this down to the “2 lions” scenario, where neither of the 2 remaining lions will try to eat the newly made sheep.
Continuing down this path of logical reason, for if the number of lions is even, then the sheep will not be eaten. However, if it is odd, one lion will eat the sheep and no other lions will eat the new sheep.
Because the scenario in this video has 10 lions at the beginning, the sheep will not be eaten, and the 10 lions will stay lions.
QED
If the lions were not aware that if one ate the sheep they would also turn into a sheep, then in the end there would be 8 lions, 1 living sheep, and 2 dead sheep
Yeah I'm so bad at this.😐I only managed to get num 5 correct😥😥 **sigh** ... Oh well
For number 4 you can also tell its not Michael because he moved to the city and Jack and his brother grew up in Chicago. If you move to the city, that means you are in a rural area prior to moving. If Michael grew up in Chicago, he wouldnt be able to move to the city because hes already in the city
The lions would have to resort to eating each other if they want to survive.
TIP, DO THE THUMPNAIL FIRST, DAILYDOSEOFINTERNET DOES THAT TOO
King Ling oh yeah
where is the logic in saying that Damien can't be the killer because he ran a marathon... that was the day before, it means nothing.
David Osborne Damien isn’t the killer because he ran a marathon while the murderer is supposed to have had a leg amputation a week ago!!
well, the leg amputation was a month ago, not a week, and while that might be pushing it, it doesn't pass for logic in my book.
What I can't see: Why is Michael the victim? He could be, but so does Damien.
Mahissimo The question here is who is the killer.. the victim could be Damien or Micheal! It doesn’t matter.
Yes, the question doesn't ask for the victim. But in the solution, they say that it was Michael. So either I missed some clue, or they made a mistake.
he is not a strict king... he is a sweet king
But what’s to say, in 4, that Damian is still alive. All it says is that the he ran a marathon the day before with an innocent person. And that he WAS a heavy drinker. It could be that he is no longer because he is dead. And in that case, the murderer would still be Jeffrey (it could’ve been Michael if it weren’t for the fact that he moved to the city and the murderer grew up in Chicago with Jack, since it could be that he gave up on becoming a farmer when he lost his leg.)
I got only 2
What's the BRIGHT SIDE of this?
Plenty of one-legged people have run marathons.
The merchant and the murderer ones were really tricky.
Great. Thank you for sharing!
Food For Healthy
Gods sake, on the first one when the guy said "yeah you're right" I thought u were supposed to take it literally, like, he was talking to the guy on the right and said Ur right, and because on the French flag it's red on the right, the guy on the right would be Mr red, and I went from there
It says nowhere that Michael couldn't have killed Jeff instead. Michael and Jack could have grown up together, but that doesn't mean that they live with eachother.
The merchant can just go outside and wait until the guard shows up. No need for him to walk for 5 minutes on the bridge.
the sharpshooter checks the bridge every 5 minutes, it takes 9 minutes to cross the bridge. it’s impossible for someone to be at the gate without the sharpshooter seeing them cross the bridge.
3:22 *cough cough* North Korea *cough cough*
OKM 5406 Exactly and he was like “Sound familiar”😂
The 1st one is easy
Well isn't that nice.
Grace Leota all you had to do is put them in the order the narrator said them
Who said I didn't get it?? Lol
Who said an amputee can't run a marathon? You've probably heard of the Paralympics and from those some people questioned if people with prosthetic limbs actually had an ADVANTAGE over uninjured people from how the prosthetic can weigh less.
#3 No one said the king is dumb- because the sharpshooter doesn't see the merchant entering the bridge so he assume the merchant was trying to escape and shoots him.
I solved 1 riddle
Me too
How?
GoldenFox 09 me too i solved the toy car in the box because i saw it before which one did you get
GoldenFox 09 me too
‼️HEY GUYS PLEASE HELP ME GET TO 1000 SUBS WITH NO VIDEOS BECAUSE THAT WOULD BE AWESOME SO PLEASE DO IT‼️
White isn't a colour
Bertram0804 yes it is. For example, what if you had a black chalkboard and you used a white chalk? Isn't it the same as using a blue chalk? If you could use a chalk that's blue, which is a color, than using a white chalk means that they're the same and they are both colors.
Actually, white and black are not colors. They are both an absence of color. The only difference is that one reflects the light, while the other repels it.
Purplepuppyunicorncataphmau 101 You realise there are two versions of “color” right? the american one and the british same as airplane and aeroplane
Purplepuppyunicorncataphmau 101 it can be spelt that way too
It's a neutral color duh
I would argue that Damian could be the murderer because he could have had his leg amputated from an accident he was in after drinking heavily and it's unfair to say an amputee can't run a marathon and the innocent person could have been his brother there for support.
The man will go in 5 mom and act like he is coming
First people where you at?😀
czcams.com/video/PRjr8IBumq4/video.html watch this...too funny 😂😂😂
R SD 😂😂
You would always be first since you're the first viewer, well the 2nd viewer might not even comment on this comment, so the next person that will be commenting on this comment might be 3rd 4th and so on
Not with you, that's for sure.
Wait... the last riddle by me: the second one can not be it, because it says it. The first one could be it, but the third one says it isn't in it. But noone said anything about third one. That means it is in the third one! If you tell me it is not then I am done with my brain
abdul ahad I'm glad that i am not alone :)
The second box has the car and the third statement is true. I’ll tell you why. The argument states that only one of the three statements can be true.
If statement 1 is true:
If statement 1 is true then the other two statements must be false. Only when statement 1 is true, only statement 3 is false. It’s true that if the car is in box one that the car cannot be in box 2 so statement 2 is true. That means the car is not in box 1.
If statement 2 is true:
If statement 2 is true then the other two statements must be false. Only when statement 2 is true, statement 3 is also true. If the car is in box 2 then it is not in box 1. That means that statement 2 must be false. The car must be in box 2.
If statement 3 is true:
If statement 3 is true then the other two statements must be false. This is the only case in which this term holds true. If it is true that there isn’t a car in box 1, then statement one is false. The car must be in box 2 making statement two false. That means that only statement 3 is true and that the car must be in box 2!
London Withers I got lost but thanks for making time to explain me how the right answer is! :)
Jan Endrych hahahah finally that knows the Good answer.
iluvperkushun what
To be fair, if the answer to the "lion and sheep" riddle is "they're rational and would understand consequences. . ." Well, don't the rational animals in Narnia TALK? The sheep could probably just tell those lions what would happen, and nobody would get eaten. I like riddle #3, though -- that is clever.
There's no stipulation that the denizens of the town don't have paperwork to enter their own town, or that the guard waits for them to get there when he sees them coming instead of merely checking to see what's going on.
#1 he’s trying to leave so obviously he’s not bringing paperwork to get in. #2 if the guard didn’t wait for them to get there then the merchant could’ve just turned and ran after the sharpshooter left his post.
4th
No you're nit
Katy Perry.
Didn't spend more than 2 sec on each one of them resulting in skipping lots of the video ;o
Aren't you clever.
Problem 3. “Only with paper work”...not anymore!!!
Man I’m on the bridge one and if they hit me with a “he was the king” imma snap
3rd box has car in it.
This is a poorly made riddle. If only one is true, it can be in either the first or the third box
you are right....3rd box has the car in it
I thought it's three because only one rule applies to each box
Explanation:
Only one sentence is correct. Other two are lies. The 1st box can't have a car inside, because that would mean that the second one is a lie.
The 2nd box sentence can't be true, because that would be a nonsence (try it). The 3rd sentence is true because:
1: not in this one(it's false)
2: in this one (false)
3: not in the first one(true).(this is thr only one that can be correct, others are false)
Answer: the car is in box number 2.
Evan Vassil Wrong. If the first is true, then the second has to be true. If the second was true, the first and third can not be both wrong. If the first doesn't have it, as a lie, it would make the third sentence true. If the third sentence lied, the first would be true. So in the process of elimination the third is true. But that doesn't mean the car is in that box. If it is true, it is not in the first box. So the 2nd is lying just like the first. In conclusion, the answer is actually the second box.
Thumbnail is neither because theyre all on the outside
Kay Boo its just a picture on a box
Number for could also be that Jeffery is the murderer and jack was he one who died. If he’s been dead since the crime then he would most likely be in isolation. Damian ran a marathon( not the murderer). Benedict got equated with jack six months ago (not jacks brother). Micheal didn’t grow up in the city which means he didn’t grow up with jack. So Jeffery killed his brother
Writing down my answers before I hear the solutions
1. Man in white is Mr. Red, Man in red is Mr. Blue, man in blue is Mr. White
2. Either 1 sheep & 10 lions or 2 sheep & 9 lions
3. The merchant went under the bridge
4. Jeffrey is the murderer
5. Box 2
So I got 2 and a half right
You won't pin this comment
Tyga Baguio and he didn't
Tyga Baguio nope
Tyga Baguio yeah, you’re right
number 4: the only factoid that is relevant is the fact that the murderer is an amputee.
it's not that difficult.
#1 Nine Lions and TWO sheep..You did not ask how many LIVE Lions and Sheep
Not sure Bright Side understands what a good riddle is.
I was expecting a LOGICAL PUZZLE
While watching this video, I remember my symbolic logic class during college days.
Okay that strict king looks and acts way to much like Kim Jong Un
Who else is watching the video and scrolling down the comments / for the answer
Box 3 has the true statement, but the car is in box 2 according to all of the statements combined.
The first one could also be Mr. White = Red Shirt, Mr. Blue = White Shirt, Mr. Red = Blue Shirt
Murderer grew up in chicago? Sounds about right.
Okay first of all, this is about the first question, as you can see Mr. White is all the way on the left, Mr. Blue in the middle, Mr. Red is on the right, based on this information, it should be that the man in the red shirt when he takes his jacket off is Mr. White, the man in the middle with a white shirt when his jacket is off has to be Mr. Blue, and Mr. Red is in a blue shirt when his jacket is off unless in this scene they switched places.