ROLEX SEA-DWELLER 16600 REVIEW

Sdílet
Vložit
  • čas přidán 26. 08. 2024
  • CHECK OUT THIS BEAUTIFUL ROLEX SEA-DWELLER 16600
    THANKS FOR WATCHING
    amzn.to/2Dpw7qH

Komentáře • 24

  • @user-lw7ix5ev3n
    @user-lw7ix5ev3n Před rokem +4

    I want this Rolex ❤

  • @greatchalla3799
    @greatchalla3799 Před 3 lety +9

    16600 Sea Dweller.....a classic it’s probably the last of the old school dive watches with a great movement and understated style. Last year produced was 2008, with a no holes case. Crystal replacements don’t have the laser crown supplied by Rolex on a Sea Dweller I’ve just had mine recently serviced and the crystal is without a crown.

    • @closer71
      @closer71 Před 2 lety +1

      I have a 1998 (U-serial) but my original crystal has no crown either. Which year did they begin doing that? Was it like, 2006-2007??

    • @greatchalla3799
      @greatchalla3799 Před 2 lety +1

      @@closer71 ....Yea, James. Rolex started adding that laser etching on all its watches in 2001. Today the newer models all seemingly include it with exception of the Milgauss with the green glass.

  • @luisvenegas9379
    @luisvenegas9379 Před 3 lety +5

    My favorite Rolex model , I purchased one 3 months ago and is absolutely fantastic watch!! Great choice 👌!!

    • @greatchalla3799
      @greatchalla3799 Před 2 lety +1

      If you only ever own a one Rolex watch, the Sea Dweller 16600 is the one watch to acquire. Engraved on rear with “Oyster Case” stamped on closure back. Uncontested this represents the essence of what best exemplifies a true sport dive master piece. Certainly big brother to the more common produced Submariner. It’s rarity will make it a collector’s must have.

  • @Lovemy911
    @Lovemy911 Před 4 měsíci +1

    I bought this in 2002 '
    €2450 back then
    Its still my daily
    🇩🇪

  • @racebannon2332
    @racebannon2332 Před 2 lety +2

    Just acquire my 2008 16600 to complement my 116600. Beautiful vintage (ish) Rolex. I’m not enamored with the cyclops as I recently sold my Cermit & YM. The two SD are great additions due their comfortable size and movement. I’m also fortunate to have a 39mm Explore (full lume) and 41mm Sub (no date of course). The 41 actually wears much bigger than the two SD’s, especially the diminutive 16600.

  • @WatchricanPsycho
    @WatchricanPsycho Před rokem +2

    THE Perfection 😍

  • @OFD
    @OFD Před 4 lety +2

    I can't believe i just watched this!! Excellent Chris 😁👍

  • @LesterLovesWatches
    @LesterLovesWatches Před 3 lety +3

    I’ve had my 16600 for a year and love the way it feels on the wrist and its understatedness. They haven’t gone up much in a year, if at all. I’d like a bit of satisfaction on that score, even if it’s a long-term keeper.

    • @closer71
      @closer71 Před 2 lety

      Reference 16600 prices have increased quite a bit since I got mine, in 2018, and I’m willing to bet they’ll be quite a bit more expensive in another three years...

  • @1968jpy
    @1968jpy Před 4 lety +5

    This is a grail Rolex. Would much rather have this than a submariner 👍🏻

  • @jh-il5sb
    @jh-il5sb Před 4 lety

    i have a hard time believing people wouldn't recognize it as a rolex. it looks exactly like a submariner! enjoy it....it's a nice example!

  • @Laguna2013
    @Laguna2013 Před rokem +1

    what do you think about this vs the SD43? I love this one you have here but I love the ceramic bezel and milled clasp of the new ones what do you think

  • @leebirtles332
    @leebirtles332 Před 4 lety

    Great vid. I bought my 16600 about 5 months ago and dont regret at all . Its also a P serial number. I only have a 16cm wrist and its not oversized at all. I think people just assume its oversized when its not . Its my first Rolex and i wanted something under the radar and I see it being alot more special than the Sub. Its turbo brother if you like. Check out Michael S on youtube who does 2 or 3 great chats about this reference too.

  • @paultowns9880
    @paultowns9880 Před 4 lety

    Simply beautiful !

  • @jc2426
    @jc2426 Před 3 lety

    What the weight of the watch please?

  • @RobertGeez
    @RobertGeez Před 3 lety

    What a stunning reference. So much better than the ubiquitous Submariner.

  • @10tpm
    @10tpm Před 11 měsíci

    Doesn’t look good on your hand