THE BEATLES - ELEANOR RIGBY | REACTION
Vložit
- čas přidán 28. 06. 2024
- THANK YOU GUYS FOR COMING AND SUPPORTING MY CHANNEL. MAKE SURE TO PLEASE HIT THAT THUMBS UP AND SUBSCRIBE!
IF YOU WOULD LIKE TO DONATE TO THE CHANNEL HERE ARE MY LINKS DOWN BELOW. THANK YOU SO MUCH FOR YOUR SUPPORT
VENMO - Chod-WilburnJr
PAYPAL - www.paypal.me/wilburnc2011
CASHAPP - Chod Wilburn Jr
PATREONS - / wilburnreactions
FUNNY CHANNEL- / chodwilburn
MOVIE REACTION CHANNEL - / wilburnmoviereactions
VLOG CHANNEL - / @journeywithchod
FACEBOOK @CHODWILBURNJR
INSTAGRAM @WILBURN_LEGACY
SNAPCHAT @I_AMCEE
TWITTER @WILBURNREACTION
This is a reaction video used to educated and give my feedback on the song and artist
||COPYRIGHT DISCLAIMER -
www.copyright.gov/fair-use/mo...
UNDER SECTION 107 OF THE COPYRIGHT ACT 1976, ALLOWANCE IS MADE FOR "FAIR USE" FOR PURPOSES SUCH AS CRITICISM, COMMENT, NEWS REPORTING, TEACHING, SCHOLARSHIP, AND RESEARCH. FAIR USE IS A USE PERMITTED BY COPYRIGHT STATUTE THAT MIGHT OTHERWISE BE INFRINGING. NON-PROFIT, EDUCATIONAL OR PERSONAL USE TIPS THE BALANCE IN FAVOR OF FAIR USE.
||DISCLAIMER
ALL VIDEOS ARE FOR ENTERTAINMENT/ NEWS PURPOSES PROTECTED BY FAIR ACT *FAIR USE* COPYRIGHT DISCLAIMER UNDER SECTION 107 OF THE COPYRIGHT ACT 1976, ALLOWANCE IS MADE FOR “FAIR USE” FOR PURPOSES SUCH AS CRITICISM, COMMENT, NEWS REPORTING, TEACHING, SCHOLARSHIP, EDUCATION AND RESEARCH. FAIR USE IS A USE PERMITTED BY COPYRIGHT STATUTE THAT MIGHT OTHERWISE BE INFRINGING. NON-PROFIT, EDUCATIONAL OR PERSONAL USE TIPS THE BALANCE IN FAVOR OF FAIR USE.
License
Creative Commons Attribution license (reuse allowed)
*Copyright Disclaimer Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, allowance is made for "fair use" for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing. Non-profit, educational or personal use tips the balance in favor of fair use. No copyright infringement intended. ALL RIGHTS BELONG TO THEIR RESPECTIVE OWNERS*. - Hudba
This version of the song is not the Beatles. John had died four years earlier. This was a version done just by Paul McCartney and a backing string section. It was done for McCartney's 1984 film called "Give My Regards To Broad Street".
Thanks for the info. On bar two I was like what the heck. Old(er) Paul? Cheers
Yep, not the original. You can definitely hear the difference.
Thank you, knew I knew it from something. Been decades, but him in the car scene?
@@garyarnett1220 I know the scene turns into Eleanor's dream, with Paul, wife Linda, Ringo Starr and his wife Barbara, dressed in old-timey (19th century?) clothes. Linda, Ringo and Barbara go over a waterfall to their death. Don't ask me.
Nevertheless, it's a Beatles song from "Revolver". "Give My Regards to Broad St." is an interesting film starring McCartney and Ringo.
this is not the original version. I'm not sure if it's just an early mix, or a much later live version. In any case, the original on the album is one million times better.
Yep.
Yep.
Definitely not the album version of this song. Lots of the instrumentation is missing. This sounds like a McCartney only version harmony wise. And then the extra violin solo is not part of the original.
This is Paul McCartney solo from the movie Give My Regards to Broadstreet.
@@debjorgo Paul should have starred himself in a Rutles movie.
This is not the officially released version by The Beatles, which is far superior to this. This may be Paul McCartney's later version from the film, Give My Regards to Broadstreet.
I've never heard this version; it sounds like something in the studio where the song wasn't complete. That definitely sounds like Paul McCartney, but I can't be 100% sure this is The Beatles at all
czcams.com/video/cAlmqVmszaU/video.html
It isn’t The Beatles’ original version. It’s a later Paul McCartney remake. 🤗
That"s from Give My Regards To Broad Street, 1984 film soundtrack
Please do the original. It's a true classic & you need to hear what millions of us heard & loved back then & over the years.💙☮
Back in the 40s' thru 60s' women used cold cream when putting on and taking off makeup. It was came in a jar, and in the case of Elenor, she kept hers in a jar by the door. The phrase is about makeup and becoming someone else. Elenor picked up the rice from someone else's wedding pretending the wedding was for her, (...lives in a dream.). This song I have always felt was a lyrical masterpiece! Both a sad lonely girl and a Minister that could not reach his congregation because "nobody came".
Spot on. Excellent comment.
I STILL use cold cream to take off my makeup!!
I believe this is a recording from the Paul McCartney album "Give My Regards to Broad Street". Not the Beatles, but a studio re recording by Paul. 1984 time period. Sounds good. "For No One" re recording is very good also.
This is just a shadow of the original version.
I prefer the version from the Revolver album with John harmonising with him. Sounded more powerful!
Next Beatles song to do. “She’s Leaving Home”
Ya Chod this version sounds very strange,..parts missing.
The original release really emphasize cello and violin. Really rich sound!
The Vevo video with 63M views is the version you need to react to it's the album version. This some stripped down version.
What everyone else said. You need to listen to the album version. I think this may have been a mix used in a film or cartoon.
It's from Paul's 1984 movie "GIVE MY REGARDS TO BROADSTREET, starring Paul, Ringo, Barbara Bach (Ringo's wife), Linda McCartney, Tracey Ullman and Bryan Brown. George Martin is also in the movie. After Paul sings Eleanor Rigby it segues into "ELEANOR'S DREAM" where George Martin arranged a long and beautiful instrumental version that is played over scenes of the daydream Paul is having while singing it.
The Beatles were pioneers in finding new uses for strings and horns in pop music. This is not the original mix of the song, it sounds like an alternate version.
One of the ways in which the Beatles changed music was in evolution of their content. They began with very catchy but somewhat shallow and fluffy pop songs and began to develop deeper and more meaningful ones. They helped music to mature into the more progressive content of the late ‘60’s and ‘70’s.
Wilburn. Can you at least get the Beatles version. It’s not too hard these days brother
Almost all attempts at reacting to actual Beatles songs are blocked on here.
Weird version, never heard it before.
You got it absolutely right! It’s simply an ode to all the lonely people, which is a subject of very deep, dark waters! The string arrangement courtesy of Sir George Martin, their producer!
The violin was meant to mimic the sound effects in the “Psycho” shower scene. Powerful. (And I see everyone has noted this is Paul’s solo version, not The Beatles version but it’s still amazing.) Nice reaction.
This is a rehearsal version.
THIS IS NOT THE BEATLES!!!!!!
This is not the original version guys.. it's good but you missed to mark on this one.
The Real "5th Beatle" was Producer/ Engineer George Martin. He had worked extensively with Symphonies and Classical Recordings. He had a great ability to add classical sounds to Rock Music. A real Genius!
I've got a picture with me and Eleanor rigby. Had to pop to Liverpool and I saw her sat on a bench.
Great song and one of the best albums of all time, pick any so g off Revolver and Enjoy! You need to hear the original though, not sure where this take is from. Also from it try She Said She Said, Tomorrow Never Knows and for Dee, Here, There and Everywhere. Utterly great songs, top 10 album of all time. Enjoy! 🎵🎤🎸🎹🎶
Whoops! This is not the original version. The original one was much much better! 🎧🪕🪕🎵🎻🎙️🎶🎻
This song led rock music with an orchestra behind them!😊🤗🎸🐬🌵🙏🙏🙏
there my favorite and cool one on CZcams right now the best CZcams ever in the world
You never know what you're going to get with The Beatles, but you know it's going to be great!
Except this isn't the original recording for the Revolver' album, it's much later re-recording that Paul McCartney made for 'Give my regards to Broad Street'
I think Paul's inspiration for this was when he was walking past some gravestones and saw her name.
If he did it was very subliminal and not a direct inspiration. McCartney has always claimed it was a combination of two names, Eleanor Bron, the British actress who had appeared in the Beatles film 'Help', and a store in Bristol called 'Rigby & Sons' which was near the theatre that his then girlfriend, Jane Asher, was performing at.
@@MrDiddyDee That is correct. He has said he never noticed that there was a gravestone with that name on it, (possibly because it is a family gravestone which has MORE than one name on it. He also said that perhaps it was a subliminal memory, but really picked the name as you stated.
I really like this stripped down version of the album original. This is the first time I've heard it. I also thought at first hearing it, it was an unfinished version of the original. As a 15 y/o teenage when this song first came out. The thing that hooked me was the classical flavor George Martin infused in the production of the song. Not just the vocals.
Great comment.. always simple and always complex. In a nutshell.
This wasn't the Beatles version, this was the solo Paul McCartney song from the 'Give My Regards To Broadstreet' movie, recorded 18 years after the original....... Although it is basically a copy.....
This song is in my top 5 Beatles songs
Elenor Rigbys grave is in Liverpool…. Paul probably say the name at some time in his life snd just liked the name and used it
This version is NOT the Beatles. This is from Paul's movie Give my regards to Broadstreet.
What is this the “great Value “ version are sure this is even the Beatles 🧐
❤May I have this dance❤ (Class of 71)🩵💙 2024😊
Wonderful
John wrote the line, wears her face in a jar by the door. There never was a wedding!
Oh wow she's so pretty looks good
The songs of the past become prophecies for the future. Listen to them and understand the now.
I just listened to the first few bars. Not the original release for sure. Could be a remix or an isolated track recording, but I think it's actually a cover, done by some unknown person.
PS. I guess others recognize this version as something Paul did for some other project much later.
can you do a reaction to Hi Hi Hi by Paul McCartney and Wings
This is not the Beatles. This is Paul doing it later as a solo project.
I've always thought that 'wearing the face that she keeps in a jar by the door,' was about putting makeup on. It could be interpretted as the face that she shows to the world but not how she actually looks.
I think Eleanor had no visitors but still put on her makeup everyday.
Never heard this version before but it doesn't take away from the song and meaning. Dee, this is the Beatles in transition. They had left behind the happy mop-top image of themselves for a maturing and more expansive sound and subject matter. The themes of love were still there, but as the studio reshaped the groups sound, it allowed for a freedom to be themselves as to reinvent themselves. Gone was the mania that swallowed up their creativity in the early part of their career. No time do anything except manufacture singles and keep going on to the next, and the next, and the next, whatever that happened to be. They really didn't have time to breathe and felt smothered in the process. This music presented after 1966, when they stopped touring, is the Beatles taking charge of their music and themselves. The Beatles breathing new life into the Beatles. The studio became the place to experiment and branch out from the formulaic jingles and allow the full pallette to mushroom and blossom. They were recording artists now in every sense. Looser but not loose. And greater because they cared enough to not be afraid to change, and simply trusted themselves and each other and just breathe, deeply. To just be their real authentic shelves. Until the end of the long and winding road.
Next up, PAPERBACK WRITER,
OH! DARLING,
& I FEEL FINE. Enjoy.
Like you guys! ❤ But where did this odd version come from?
The 'face that she keeps in a jar by the door' to me indicates an expression that she has when she expects someone to arrive (who is it for?) whether they arrive or not. In other words it's not her normal expression, perhaps more hopeful, more expectant or happier but we assume that no one came. I always wondered why 4 young men at the prime of their lives and the height of their fame wrote a song about loneliness. The range of their subject matter was surprising.
This is just Paul, his song so he can do what he wants. I think this is from his movie Broadstreet.
This song was written in the day when people still did darn their socks.
First time I have ever heard this version.
"All the Lonely People" - another masterpiece from the Beatles. IMO, the Beatles were in the stratosphere above all other performers/songwriters. I recently saw an interview with a well known writer from NNM (New Music Express), respected British music publication. He said " The Beatles were the greatest all round band, but my personal favorites were the Small Faces, they were brilliant"!! Couldn't have said it better, hint, hint!! From their biggest cheerleader...
Yay! My favorite Beatles song! So glad to hear you loved it, BUT…you MUST listen to the studio version which sounds WAYYYYY better! ❤️✌🏻✌🏻❤️
Keeps her face in a jar by the door written by John.
Ray charles does a really nice cover of this song, must listen
I honestly don't get why some reactors choose this version when the original is literally the first result 💀
As a drummer Chod, you should check out the band "Calexico" especially the song "El Cascabel" from Live at the Barbican. They are a band from Tucson, Arizona.
What a bummer. Have they ever rectified this? They had to have read the comments by now
Why didn't you listen to the original recording by the Beatles? This is Paul McCartney's re-recording in the 1980s. Their 1966 recording from 'Revolver' is just brilliant.
Reminds me of this character Miss Havisham, in Charles Sickens'
novel "Nicholas Nickleby".
Wandering, ghost-like, in by decrepit mansion....covered in cobwebs.
I'm just like Elanor. Because I know the majority of people are assholes, after so much time that is true beyond a shadow of a doubt. It's very easy to become like this in society. But nobody really gives a shit about anything but themselves. As far as the song, it's a bit different and fuller on the original Beatles recording. But close, in this one you can really hear Paul's voice better.
Unfortunately, I agree with you completely. I used to be optimistic about the human race and believe the best in people, but I honestly don't know how anyone can make it through life these days and not be fully aware of how horrible and self-centered the majority of people are.
I suggest to you that you research rock music history. Go back to the mid to late 50's and see what was available in rock and roll music back then. Also, notice that rock and roll music was under fire from the establishment and religious types and there were campaigns to ban some radio stations from playing the records. Also parents were stopping their kids from listening, associating it with crime and trouble makers. So there was an all out assault on rock music. Follow it all the way up to the early 60's, say 61 t0 63 and once you experience that take a measurement of how you think it progressed along the way. Then when you get to Feb. 9 1964 Watch The Ed Sullivan Show from that evening. This is the moment that all of that changed for the better. The door holding everything back was about to be kicked in. This is the moment that we were set free, as young people, from the shackles of the old guard. All of the music that came after grew from this moment. With The Beatles leading the way and breaking down barriers for the ones still to come. Keep following that path of rock music history all the way up to 1970 and beyond. Learn what really went down! Then you will see why The Beatles get the love and respect from fans and a multitude of major artists who still sing their praises to this day. Listen and learn! That was not the original release by the way. It was an outtake from a rehearsal or a run through. You must react to the original! Peace! Your wife has good taste in music! So do you!
Hey there!! This is NOT the Beatles. This is Paul McCartney ... rearranging a song that was mostly composed by himself with the work of Mr George Martin and backing vocals at least from John Lennon who was murdered in 1980. I would bet that if John was alive and well by then, he would not allowed that very easily . The ORIGINAL one's on the REVOLVER ALBUM,. along with yellow submarine , was the major hit single from the record ☯️✌ take care
Beatles "Everybody's Got Something To Hide Except For Me And My Monkey" will blow your mind
Did you notice that that song has no drums, guitar keyboards or bass guitar. It’s all classical string instruments.
This is Paul McCartney solo, I believe.
Hi Guys, Paul once said the name came from a grave in a cemetery near where he lived, but the meaning was yes loneliness, as Elenor puts on a different face when going outside, lived in her own world alone so yes for all the lonely people can relate to today where so many live in the world of the internet only not mixing in the REAL world especially in this pandemic.
Keep Safe Keep Strong 🦘🦘🦘🦘🎶🎶🎶🎶
On a different note... This song was in my 10th grade English book and discussed in class as a poem.
I absolutely love the Beatles, have since the early 70's. You should do the actual Beatles one of this song.
Need to do the original version off the Revolver album. This was not the Beatles. It was a remake Paul McCartney did in the 80's
A great song like this could have different meanings to different people. I agree with your interpretation, though. It's a beautiful song, but kind of melancholy at the same time. Music is feelings...
l already read the comments, so, sorry to say I won't be staying for the reaction, because apparently, this was a substandard version of the recording.
Should of done the official version on the Revolver album. Much better…😢😢😢
beautiful woman!
Not sure what version you have there. It's a bit off from the actual original
Noticed immediately like everyone else, not the original version which is much better although this one does hold its own.
On this version you can definitely hear what a great singer McCartney is, but nothing beats the original.
Yes. Y'all would do well to check out the original version. This sounds like a knock-off. As much as you like this you will like the real version even better.
VERYYYYYY COMPLEX CHOD, YOU SHOULD DO : A DAY IN THE LIFE 😊
Love the playful ? tension between you two
Ray Charles renditions of beatles-songs are the best. You should listen to Ray perform this song.
It's very tough to find many true Studio versions of Beatles songs even on CZcams these days because of how tightly protected copyrights are on Beatles music.
This version is a vocal guide by Paul with added instrumentation for the "Love" project.
This is a re-recording done in 1984 for a movie called Give My Regirds to Broadstreet. It has nothing to do with Love.
For the 'Love' album it was mash-ups using the original studio takes. This is however is a 1984 re-recording McCartney made for his 'Give my regards to Broad Street', film and album project.
I was a pre-teen when this came out. Even then I thought it was a disturbingly sad song. Probably not the words I would have used at that age, but it invoked that emotion.
Ditto, not the best version but still nice,Dee so pretty tonight, thanks for the great music and I enjoy your channel 👍😀❤️
No this is not the Beatles version but it's still very very good!
This isn't the Beatles version from the classic Revolver album
Great song! Now, though, you should give a listen to Vanilla Fudge's cover of it. Fantastic!
If you want to hear a killer version of this song listen the version by Zoot. Unique and unforgettable.
Weird version not the original which was truly haunting.
Listen to The Beatles version this was done later by Paul !
Nice to hear a version that I don't have memorized.
Most of Beatles albums are "mono" recorded... Best versions... But the catalogue has been remastered
Since the original version of this song, the use of cellos in particular in rock and pop will elicit remarks like, "Sounds Beatle-esque."
Watch the clip using animation from their movie 'Yellow Submarine', using the original studio version, even if just for yourselves. Watch the whole movie, especially if you have kids past toddler stage, maybe even if not. It's colourful, great music, obv., not too scary. Made a splash at the time. Ads carried a quote from George Harrison: "It's all in the mind, y'know."
I could be wrong, but I think that is a cello and not a violin. At least that's what it sounds like to me. Violins tend to have longer drawn out notes and a bit higher pitched. I suppose you could tune one to sound like that, but I digress...
Listen to the version from their Revolver album. Much fuller sound.
Ray Charles dose a great cover of this song you guys should check out
Not the Beatles version