The Turkish Origins Of India's Partition | Abhijit Chavda | Genocide Of Kashmiri Hindus |Moplah Riot
Vložit
- čas přidán 28. 01. 2020
- India's undemocratic partition - instigated by Jinnah, accepted by Gandhi and the Congress Party, and midwifed by the British - was a traumatic, epoch-making event that vivisected the world's oldest civilization. It opened wounds that have never healed. Its effects reverberate to this day, in the form of "the idea of Pakistan" and calls for "Jinnah wali azaadi" in India.
Partition did not solve anything. The nation was broken up, and India still finds itself in a state of undeclared war with Pakistan over seven decades later. What caused Partition? What forces impelled it? Who were the principal actors? The answer is surprisingly complex.
In this talk, Abhijit Chavda shows how a sequence of seemingly unrelated events set in motion centuries ago in Arabia, Central Asia, and Turkey, eventually culminated in India's partition and the unspeakable violence and atrocities that accompanied it.
About the Speaker: -
Abhijit Chavda is a theoretical physicist, technologist, and writer. His work in theoretical physics involves research on the topics of dark matter, dark energy, black hole physics, quantum gravity and physical cosmology. He has authored and co-authored several research papers on these topics. He has extensive experience in the field of information technology, having worked in diverse roles on numerous technologies and platforms.
He is also a writer and researcher of history and geopolitics. He writes articles for several publications including the Asian Age, the Deccan Chronicle, IndiaFacts, Indic Today, MyNation, OpIndia, and Swarajya. He has written several influential articles debunking the Aryan Invasion / Migration Theory on the basis of science and empirical evidence.
Abhijit is a member of the consultative group to the Principal Scientific Adviser to the Government of India. He is also a public speaker, a CZcamsr, an influential tweeter at @AbhijitChavda, a TV panelist on NewsX, Republic TV and Times Now, and a regular participant in literary fests such as the Jaipur Dialogues and the Pondy Lit Fest.
Subscribe to our CZcams channels:
CZcams English: / sangamtalks
CZcams Hindi: / sangamhindi
Follow Sangam Talks on social media :
Telegram : t.me/sangamtalks
Twitter: / sangamtalks
Facebook: / sangamtalks
Instagram: / sangamtalks
Website: www.sangamtalks.org
Donate: www.sangamtalks.org/donate
#SangamTalks
![[Q/A] The Turkish Origins Of India's Partition | Abhijit Chavda | Khilafat Movement | Moplah Riot](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/_5sFP8UVVhE/mqdefault.jpg)
![[Q/A] The Turkish Origins Of India's Partition | Abhijit Chavda | Khilafat Movement | Moplah Riot](/img/tr.png)
“Mahatma” Gandhi always preached ahimsa to Hindus but he never dared to preach it to Muslims
Neither he ever went to fast challenging them as he did with Hindus. He knew they wouldn't give a rats ass for him and will happily just let him die.
A cunning hypocrite.
But according to records he was AGAINST the partition and did call a " necessary cleansing " any escalation of hostilities toward Sunni Muslims.
You're a lying. Gandhiji was for peaceful India for everyone. The extremists want to destroy India.
@@SZAS1978 Gandhian policy is so peaceful that India got crushed by China in 1962.
He conveniently closes his eyes.We believed them this Ghandi and Nehru cheated us.
Great speech. You have stripped Gandhi naked without undressing him. Let our country men think beyond Gandhi and we will identify that concept called non violence is itself a bullshit.
I am not advocating violence but true meaning of non violence is not to hurt others until they hurt you and for no fault of of you.
He Failed baloch and Sindhi's.
Even the national anthem has Sindh but is it Indian
Netiji.. subhash Chandra Bose is real father of nation.period...sadly no mention of him in our history books.
Well said sir
This dude is talking like a sanghi.
@@warpdrive9229 what wrong did he say? You are saying it was good that we let the thieves beat us to crap for decades and do nothing but protest with a candle to gain freedom?
Wow, as an old(er) American, who grew up in the 60s, this is in a remarkable explanation of what happened. Really facinating. Many thanks.
As an Indo-American I caught a lot of lies in our history textbooks during school. Even in college. Thanks to Google, they were easy to prove. It’s designed to churn out misinformed citizens so that the ones in power can continue to build empires without getting caught. A vast majority of world history is conveniently skipped.
Same with media coverages. It’s thoroughly misguiding. Having a solid and wide ranged knowledge of history, economics, and geopolitics helps to discern the truth relatively easier compared to a vast majority of citizens. It’s important to understand the coverage of the same matter from external sources as well.
So that is the reason most Turkish people who don't look like Turks but have Turkish names and customs..
Love from Hindus🙏❤️🕉️🚩
No one can be a father of the nation, we all are sons and daughters of MAA BHARATI🚩🇮🇳
@lzydwg who are mlechhas ? If you mean muslims ,then they also have Indian DNA
Correct.
@lzydwg u r ryt
Gandhi is the father of pakistan
Definitely not MKGandi
Netaji Bose was Indian version of Atatürk. Very well researched speech. Thanks.
Edit: I made this comment when I was just 2 minutes into the video. I didn't know they were also going to talk about the dark side of Gandhi 🤪
‐---------
@lzydwg May be. But that was not all the options left. We had Sardar Vallabhai Patel! Yes, the iron man. During the last Congress party leadership election before independence, he sweeped the entire nation in favor of him. But there was one soul supporting Nehru and requesting Patel to let Nehru become the first PM. That one leader outweighed the wish of the entire Indian subcontinent. If he had not been biased, Patel may have taken India in a different path.
I'm never against Gandhiji. But there are many decisions like this that makes me unhappy.
We had BR Ambedkar too.
Super true
If not divided, what would have present political scenario of "undivided India"
@Family ghalsasi You should watch the video again. Bose was not indian version of Ataturk. The current prime minister of india is the indian version of Ataturk, who is product of hindutva ideology.
No wonder Ataturk refused to meet Gandhi in 1933 as he saw Gandhi and congress as procaliphal and British agents.
Great observation sir.
HOW CATHOLICS CREATED ISLAM👉czcams.com/video/IksrzGhLs7E/video.html
czcams.com/video/L7RWfZoJICc/video.html
A Vatican Priest was killed due to revealing this
@@navinasimoes Gandhi was maintained by British government after he was beaten and driven out of South Africa for more than an year. Then in srl lanka for 6 months. He sneaked into congress party.
@suviram das what made u think that i am Christian? I exposed catholic n islams connection
@suviram das yes christianity is stupid.. have u heard about jesuits? Or secret societies?
Believe it or not, After I visited Turkey in 2013 and returned, I immediately started comparing Ataturk and Gandhi and Gandhi stood no chance...I felt it was an insult to Indians, calling Gandhi the father of the nation, while on the other side Ataturk was actually the father of their nation..
91rummy You understand Atatürk lheritage
My skin crawls with absolute DISGUST when people refer to that Shameless Fraudster Gandhi as Father of the nation in India. Sick vile man.
@@ulgenkoc2893 Battle of Haifa the iNDIANS DEFEATED THE SHIT TURKS WHILE INDIAN TROOPS WERE OUTNNUMBERED LOL.
Who is Ataturk?
@@sahashranshubarik9204 Ataturk is actually the title...His name is Mustafa Kemal. In short, He was the one who rejected the Caliphate, transformed Turkey's education, economics and set the country on the path to prosperity.
I cancelled my plans of Cappadocia(Turkey) and went to Georgia instead ......Jai hind 🇮🇳
Good for you! Don't feed snakes.
Good
@@ss-if6ns Nope bro Turkish people are good ones & are very secular in nature, Erdogan shouldn't be yardstick to judge Turks who actually like Indians
But Cappadocia is amazing.
Turkey is amazing.
@@vichitramanava4272
TOTALLY AGREE WITH YOU!! THAT IS TRUE!!
A person who cancels Turkey don't know what they are missing!!
Well Croatia nice too of course. (Not visited but it's nice too, I know) But I would NEVER cancel a journey to Turkey. I loooooooove Turkey! 🙏💛💖💛🙏🇹🇷🇹🇷🇹🇷🇹🇷🙏💛💖💛🙏 Fantastic country! Lovely ppl. Wonderful culture. Food. Music. Nature!
Forget the politics. It's separate thing!
My suggestion is: Visit both Turkey and Croatia! Why not! 🤷
🙏💛🌸💖🌸💛🙏
This lecture brilliantly explains why Indian muslims & anti-nationals love Gandhi so much. Think about it.
May be this is the reason why Indira Rajiv Antonio MainoUrf Sonia now Raul carefully preserve and attach gandi to their names as if it is a title
@@ravs5882 Rajeev Gandy and Antonia Maino
Muslims never followed Gandhi , but openly said ' we don't need Gandhi but Gandhi needs us '
So all who called him Mahatema were anti-national. What lunatic asylum had releases you.
@@dr.m.gopichandgopichand7214
Correctly said
Even now true history is not taught in schools in India.
I failed in History subject. Now I am happy 😃
Techno Mobile ~😃 not feel Bad Bt, it has interesting subject & none can be escape its a view point, nothing else
Yes fake history is taught... n it will take some time to change... because no many know the problem.. but untill then learn true history yourself n others...
HOW CATHOLICS CREATED ISLAM czcams.com/video/L7RWfZoJICc/video.html
Petition PM Modi. Get as many signatures as you can.
If this be the case I can only apologise as a Turk. I can see that this strife between Pakistan and India was unnecessary. There should have been no partition. The role of the British was of course to divide and prevent a strong India . That's unarguable. I checked the role of Gandhi and again I can only praise one thing. He transcended Indian regionalism. He failed India in 1919 and after that was an obstacle. Willingly or unwilling he was a tool of separatists and the British. It's very sad. I hope for peace there.
🙏
Thankyou brother, Eurasians are noble people
Laanat upon kemal the jew ✡
@@abdullahlaghari1445 leave the infidel youtube, pork lover
@@abdullahlaghari1445 Mustafa Kemal is not a Jew.
OMG. Mind blowing. He stripped Gandhi completely naked without uttering a single word of abuse or anger. What a speaker, what a scholar. This is how its done, folks.
Srijan please arrange his lecture on Aryan invasion myth. He has written books about it.
Very very knowledgeable man. A scholar in his own right.
Why did Gandhi came back from South Africa? What he was doing in SA?. If he didn't came back to India from SA where he settled initially, what would have the situation of Indian history and his own history?
India paid for Gandhian blunders of khalifat movement and quit India movement by giving up territories of Pakistan and Bangladesh
Even then indian voters BLINDLY VOTE FOR CONGRESS N SUPPORT GAANDHI AS FATHER OF NATION !
@@enjoyparents True. Because everybody rely on his leadership, which Nathuram Godse understand and wiped him out. But his ideology continued with most secular & liberals.
@@satyam1529 Godse by killing Gandhi weakened Hindu movement. Hindus had to bear the guilt of killing Gandhi for 70 years.
Khilafat was a horrendous blunder, but the two nation theory was around much earlier, as articulated by Syed Ahmed Khan in a speech of 1888. He even had suggested that Muslims could not live under Hindu rule, but could easily conquer the Hindus. AIML itself was formed in 1906, although it demanded a nation state for Muslims only later.
Now you should enunciate how Partition could have been avoided. It couldn't : Only a well planned and organized peaceful mutual exchange of populations could have been attempted, with a debatable degree of success .
@simba1 What I said was what SAK spoke. But definitely, after the British rule, they would have captured some of the current Pak territories, and a blood bath would have been unavoidable. Khan was referring to those regions. where the Muslims had superior strength: The fact is they had will and motivation for a war. So it had to be a peaceful separation or civil war. That was what Ambedkar recognized, when he recommended an exchange of populations. But what I stressed was, the idea of separation existed with Muslims decades before Khilafat even through armed conflict.
बहुत बढ़िया और स्पष्ट है।
कृपया इस तरह के महत्वपूर्ण भाषणों का हिंदी अनुवाद भी करें,ताकि ज्यादा से ज्यादा लोग लाभान्वित हों।।
धन्यवाद
Sab wahi krenge kyaa,unke paas funds ki kami hai bahut. Kripa khud hindi anuwaad kre aur subtitles bhej de inko
I am a proud "Hindu" but when 1st time I read about Ataturk on the internet who is a "muslim", it seemed that he was inspirational and a very good leader.
People of Turkey in the 1st half of the 20th century were lucky they had such a great leader while at the same time people of India were unlucky to have GANDHI as their leader.
And very much thankful to Abhijit Chavda Sir for his research and explanation of it in such a descriptive way.
My God. This needs to be heard by everyone & a chapter in school history books! What an amazing Orator and brilliant content. 🙏
It will never be allowed because this man is heavily biased against Muslims and Islam. Notice how he trashes the Ottomans as blood thirsty; they were not. As empires go, the Ottoman empire was perhaps the most humane of them all.
Brilliant!! Insightful, thought provoking talk. Very grateful to Mr Chavda & Srijan. How did he find so many unknown connections between India, Saudi, Central Asia & Turkey?? Our history is very poorly represented in textbooks. Real history is hidden from us.
I have seen Chavda speak eloquently about science in Pondicherry. Here he gives a brilliant lecture about history. How he explained leadership & exposed fraud GANDHI is genius. I wont be surprised if he can teach bodybuilding too. We need to see more of him. No shortage of multi faceted talent in India. Jai Hind.
Eye opener about the history. Those who do not learn from the history they will have to pay the same price. History repeats itself.
Dear Indians, I´m from Austria in Europe. This lecture was indeed very interesting. While we Austrians were unable to keep together our most important states after WW1, Mustafa Kemal Atatürk was not only able to secure the Ottoman heartland, which is Anatolia and "little Asia" but also to keep it ethnically homogenous. Please don´t understand me wrong, but I think that Ghandi also wanted to keep India as homogenous and big as possible and he knew that the partition was inevitable as the English had planned it in secret. Austria was decimated to insignificance which fostered Hitler and the evil faschist regime. India is still vast and you have plenty of opportunities inside your giant country. Europe and the US are stagnating economically, China is a brutal dictatorship - so the future belongs to you. Once you become economically really successful, Pakistan and Bangladesh will beg you to rejoin. Just my opinion, please correct me if I´m wrong !
No sir, you have spoken absolute truth.
Great lecture deeply analyzed I am so thankful that I was able to listen and learn the history in different perspective
India will have its day soon...economically and rest of world acceptance in 25-30 yrs...but Muslims in the neighbourhood will not join...because thier faith is such....but Indian Muslims will see the light of day in Dharma...a better way if life 🙏
@Redwan Rahman By allowing people to enter /lnfiltrate India for shedding their burden and better their own economy
Thanks for sharing your thoughts on how you perceive the state of affairs in this context.
Economics is just one part of the narrative. But that wasn't the main factor for separation of Pak and Bangladesh.
The factors were fundamentally of religious exclusivity. No matter what you do, and how much ever you portray secular outlook, Islam will not let them remain even as equals. Domination and conversion to Islam by any means is a duty. A religion that doesn't accepted realities and lives in the past will not let anyone have independent thought.
One of bollywood celebrity actors have named their son taimur...what great patriotic citizens of present India...but they continue to flourish here
And his wife is hindu :}
Beautiful people we have ese hi bc 800 saal gulami nhi ki
Today also some Shia clerics take orders from Iran, few Sunnis clerics are funded entirely by Saudi Arabia, Qatar, UAE etc
Hindus take command from banaras
@@taufeeqkhan2629 m.economictimes.com/news/politics-and-nation/lucknow-shia-muslims-protest-against-us-on-iranian-general-qasem-soleimanis-killing/videoshow/73101465.cms
Kindly make substantiated claims. Also banaras is in India so our loyalties reside in India. Do you even know how much money comes from Saudi to promote Wahabi Ideology in India. Atleast 1 bn dollars a year. Recently Saudi prince has said that he'll slowly cut back on that money
I have friends whose whatsapp status most of the time is the speeches from Clerics of Iran
@@taufeeqkhan2629 The Science of Sanatan Dharma is Hinduism. We don't have any managers of God nor commandments. *We follow our Conscience. For us God is within ourselves.* Namaste.
Arun Krist In my opinion by birth every human being is a sudra. It is by education and upbringing that one becomes 'twice born', that is, a dvija, designated to a person based on one's aptitude, quality, mental state and characteristic. Namaste
*Caste and Hinduism explained* czcams.com/video/k7q_LtZUJZw/video.html
Salute to you my dear Author. An extraordinarily important historical issue which was ignored , is brought into light.
Occasionally in life we meet a superior man, who informs us, challenges us and makes us think. Thank you for the enriching experience, Adhijit Chanda.
Superman or historian with an agenda?
@@stuarthastie6374 I don’t know Adhijit Chanda. I am not well enough informed to see where he is going with this. Good question though.
@@bobjuniel8683 No account of history, in the history of History, has ever been entirely free of some sort of bias. Take it as it is, an interesting perspective and addition to the ever shifting mandala of how people view the past. I liked it.
@@spoonman-youtubechangedmyhandl ✅
@@stuarthastie6374 what part of his presentation is agenda? Before 37:00 which is basically the history as approved by west or the latter part which is the truth about Gandhi, which if you ask any well read indian today, will tell you that Gandhi was the biggest scam in the name of peace and freedom.
Very insightful talk. 👏🏼👏🏼👏🏼👏🏼👏🏼👏🏼👏🏼 👏🏼👏🏼👏🏼👏🏼
Every Indian actually understands the blunders done by Gandhiji but no one could talk about it. Our history definitely needs to be rewritten.
they are ignorant, don't wanna know the truth that in bengal 1971 most hindus died, in khilafat most hindus died, in kashmir pandits died.
Most common were the brutal rapes against hindu women, while most librandu hindu writers support sickularism and don't accept these genocide, IRONY
Truth never dies...
Gandhi's first re-tweet (!!) of Khilafat movement (KM) led to the "popularizing" the movement and soon after KM dropped Gandhi (as usual) and started allegiance to outside India Khilafat and demanded Pakistan... Everything starts and ends with Gandhi..!!!
Ironically ended with Godse .... Killing Bapu , the Mahatma who never thought of this treachery by those who betrayed Mahatma after utilising him thoroughly and dumped him , to make him food for thought , I still salute Bapu who only wanted brotherhood in our motherland. Those who blatantly misused this angel of ahimsa to promote the dynastic rule and still falsely claim following Gandhian policies .
Fortune to have the treachery undone step by step by the right thinking people veho put the nation first ,and oppose adapting laws of others born to other blood being the blood of our great grandfathers of our sacred land of mortality .
Stripped the hypocrite called Mahatma!!
Yes sir, totally exposed the fake mahatma. Very grateful for this talk.
Gandhi was a monster in a saint's guise!!
Duratma Gandhi`s picture should be removed from our currency notes.
this fool is now god figure for many other fools.
not gandhi...but gandhu
A superb presentation by the inimitable Abhijit Chavda ji. He is truly the best history teacher i never had!
Revisiting this talk today after several months. I learn something new every time I watch this. Especially - WATCH THE LAST 5 MINUTES - Simply BRILLIANT. The speaker is a true thought leader.
Need more talks from Dr. Chavda. Also, thanks Sangam talks for asking him to do a talk about Aryan invasion myth. Too good.
Very nice and beautiful analysis
There's no much difference between Maulana Azad and the Ali Brothers
And Gandhi too .
And the worst part is that useless maulana became our education minister !! No wonder we are in a pathetic condition
@@livingpiano it is part of appeasement politics of scamgress
@@livingpiano Even Quaid e millath and jinnah /liaquat factions were on the same page wrt their ummat interests against India's interests...
Bhaio Maulana Azad aur APJ Abdul Kalam ko isse alag rakho...
Inko Nehru aur left ke thekedaaro se mat joro ....
A wonderful presentation especially the last 10 minutes where he breaks down the issues at hand bit by bit with comparisons to reveal the quintessential truth. He has the makings of a great public speaker.
bravo barath, we need this channel to grow exponentially as soon as possible. ALL talks have to be translated to all the major languages of the world. The potential potency of soul quenching topics have a reach like non other. Congrats and God Speed to all&all.
Brilliant analysis! Honest and evidence based. Makes perfect sense. It is rewarding to watch a balanced and unbiased explanation!
Is this why the nations looters still run to and are protected from Indian Law in Britain?
Think so. British coffers are filled with other countries' looters and tax evaders. Otherwise, how can such a SMALL country be a GREAT Britain.?
@@samvensesh5438 One should consider the fact that Congress wasn't in piwer when Mallya fled to Britain even when a travel ban exists against him. Means everybody, beyond political and ideological, borders, belong to the elite ruling community's hands are dirty! While vouching for patriotism all are appeared to be collaborators in one way or other.
@@samvensesh5438 JJ j
@@samvensesh5438 6:21
How terrible, we're suffering because Gandhi supported the Khilafat movement. We've been through genocide , how and why did Gandhi support Khilafat movement. Didn't he have a heart and foresee our suffering . I would call him nothing short of ' a cruel person '.
Now you think about nathuram godse & find his last lecture From CZcams
& asked is he kill Gandhi or Save us?
it's a million dollar question?
Time will tell that...
Now another proof we have _ Aryan invation theory by which the western people divide us was not correct( false).
Dravirian & north indian are same race.....
Gandhi was a British agent. He was invited to come to India from South Africa by Gokhale, a staunch pro-British
Never learned much of this great history lesson here, but your facts and effective analysis and conclusions were very good. I learned a lot from this presentation and now see more of both sides of this story, a view not often shown. Thank you!
I have been listening your podcasts since last 48 hours non stop. Each episode from Mongols to WW2 and recent Indo - US evolving geopolitics is succinctly depicted with deep knowledge and insights of truth.
The great game for India to reach its super power status is to create an adaptive yet sentient supply chain system
OMG god, wonderful wonderful. The end cleared out my long time inner mind debate and settled me.
It was a wonderful presentation, with deep insights of Historical transition and transformation,that impacted Hindustan. Inspired to say that, inspite of so many invasions, Conquests, Conversions, Hinduism still thrives in full bloom.We should be grateful to all our ancestors,who hung on to Hindu faith and belief,under extreme circumstances and hostile environment. Let us do our bit of setting things right, by being with people like Mr.Chadda,who are calling a spade a spade.Jai Hind !
Wowwwww what a speech by Abhijit sir specially when he showed the promise of bhagwan Krishna I got goosebumps
Sins of one gujrati(gandhi) is being corrected by another gujrati(modi).
@@NativeVsColonial Pakistan aur China ko sidha kar diya aur kya chahiye
Pakistan was also created by one converted gujrati named Jinnah!!
Yes
@@pkk5612 yes Pakistan will be undone by another Gujarati Amit Shah
taroni look how that turned out. Where is Pakistan now.😂😂
Wow excellent talk.
Wow. This is a fantastic analysis. Great learning - thank you for the deep historical research and wonderful questions at the end.
Interesting and too good....just loved it. Looking fwd for more such talk. Best thing is that the speaker has left the conclusion of talk to viewers and allow them to contemplate and correctly concluded the assessment of talk without bais and enforcing his view. Godspeed Srijan.
Shepard serves the owner of the sheep . The motives of the owner of the sheep is not the welfare of the sheep as he will happily send them to their slaughter for a few pieces of gold !
Cannot be more true sir.
1400 saal pehle cruel mindset.
Abhi bhi is desh meh aise log rhte hn, jinkhaa peechaa kiyaa jaanaa chaahiye !
I love the way you show your support on every topics concerning India's history and legacy ❤.
@@masterclass299
Thank you 🙏
@@roserosarosen5637 I want to connect with you. Are you on Twitter or insta
Brahmins mixed with Siva aachariyarghal in 9th century for working in temples.only aacharis wrote sanskrit lingùist to brahmins.u might be native so check ur histroy
@chesster instead of chest keep ur name nut skull.brahmins are well educated in which,from where did they get their knowledge.know the history properly kid.she will understand wat said.
Thank you so much for presenting so much of history in short and factual manner. Well done
So much new information. Finally verdict Ataturk of Turkey was a great visionary leader than Gandhi and Nehru.
Gandhi and Nehru were just perverts...
Absolutely thought provoking lecture! Bow to your wisdom.
I wondered in school why India has to worry about a Islamic tyrant system especially at a time when Indians were busy fighting British also Indian were busy fighting Social evil and rediscovering lost heritage of India. This Great Mahatma has sowed seeds of Partition which will haunt India for next 500 years. Jinnha was just a slog over batsman but actual long innings was played by Gandhi..
Gandhi was a British agent from beginning. He was planted by the britishers in india.
Eagerly waiting.
You are a gifted speaker and thinker.
My guru maharaj AC Bhaktivedanta Prabhupad has taught us just as you have. Jai Hind Vande Mataram
Yes he had said India became free due to Netaji not Gandhi.... even hindol sengupta has written a biography of prabhupad.
Brilliant work. I wish to be part of such research.
Then you should read Rajiv malhotra books
Truly outstanding, extraordinary!!!
Straight facts, brilliant mind. Big ups, big fan !
That's Brilliantly explained.
Would be great if there are follow up lectures depicting how it influenced independent India, current leadership and what the presenter thinks should be the furure course of our actions under current world order.
Thanks for such an insightful research Mr. Chavda.
This is an excellent lecture. There is something relentless about the Islamic desire to rule the world...handling with a firm hand has to coexist with sincerely fostering democracy
Thank You Abhijit Sir. Wish the voters of delhi had listened to at least the last 5 minutes of your talk
The best video I have ever found which has very diplomatically destroyed the false narrative we Indians have been fed for many decades by people who are supposed to be our own people. Loved the video sir🔥🔥.
I was in Turkey there is an absolute respect and love for India and Indians...a great place and engagement as a strong india is the way forward
Normal citizen of Turkiye loves both India and Pakistan
@hariharans4962
But then what happened to Erdogan, was he not born to Turkish parents?
@@danielrauf4094
Yeah, only the
Abnormal citizen only, of Turkiye loves Pakistan but not India.
@@MrPoornakumarhe is a product of muslim brotherhood
He has used ppl to gain power and then removed those who helped him
Example
Gullen
fascinating insights on history. this is a great channel. what a boon to live in an internet age. by means of these type of channels, who need the corrupt books that we are taught history.
Excellent. I am having goose bumps
Thank you for talking of tengrism , few people know about it.
@Rage of Zeus yes
Excellent coverage and perfect delivery of the subject.
Thanks. A very thought provoking lecture.
I was in Turkey recently and found a lot of tourists there, mostly from US an India but all were Muslims. After interacting with them, I understood that although they are Indian by birth they believe and owe allegiance to Turkey. I thought this was elated to the Ottoman links with the adilshah and nizam shah of India. I did not think about the khilafat movement!
Great talk Mr. Chavda..It was really an experience to listen to you. The manner in which you connected the dots and brought forth the real picture from behind the stage..
If Sardar Patel had become India’s first Prime Minister, Nehru would have become its second - shortly after we became a republic.
One of the simple facts we miss is that Sardar Patel was much older [by 14 years] and by 1947 was less in good health compared to Nehru. Patel died in 1950 - after living a good long 75 years. This is one likely reason why the Mahatma prevailed over Patel to give up the top post to Nehru. A young nation needed someone to take it further and in Nehru the Mahatma found someone who could take it much further than the other founding fathers.
And Patel as the Home Minister got almost what he wanted. He was primarily focused on Hyderabad and Junagadh - two overwhelmingly Hindu majority regions within India whose rulers had an impractical desire to join Pakistan. Unlike Kashmir, these regions didn’t share borders with both the countries and entirely within India. Patel got the resources to fight for them and get them successfully integrated into India.
With due respect to our Prime Minister Modi, Sardar Patel did not actively seek Kashmir [Sardar Patel’s Kashmir Dilemma]. It didn’t make that much sense to fight for a territory that was not a Hindu majority at a time the nation had bigger priorities. It was Nehru’s war and his idealistic notion that India should be a home to even regions that had a Muslim majority.
Reference: Quora
Facts checked by me on WikiPedia
PS: #self_research_matters
Great lecture with full of insights in the Indian history.
Mr. Abhijit Chavda, it's not easy to prepare and to present the way you've here. Thanks so much for educating a lot of people like me, appreciated!
Excellent unbiased fact based discourse .. makes complete logical sense. Kudos to the effort 🙏🙏🙏
How educational! A lot of history has been hidden from us in Indian history textbooks! Thank God! CZcams is teaching me so much nowadays!
Abhijeet sir never disappoints 💥🚩🚩
Wonderful talk must for everyone who loves this Nation. I wish students in school are taught such lessons.We will automatically get much cleaner Nation politically and culturally.
Jai Ho Abhijit Chavada Ji 🙏🌹
WoW amazing ending loved it!! Thank You.
In the book *"Islam the story that must not be told" Ambedkar writes; The blood-curdling atrocities committed by the Moplahs/Muslims in Malabar, Kerala against the Hindus were indescribable.* As usual, Gandhi failed to produce any satisfactory response to Ambedkar's charges. The conduct of Gandhi during the Moplah riots, and his views on them once the carnage had subsided, remain a blot on Gandhi. Ambedkar was an apologist, he spared no one, not even Gandhi, who he blasted for giving into the selective bias.
"He [Gandhi] has never called the Muslims to account even when they have been guilty of gross crimes against Hindus on several occasions."
Again, these and many such double standards of Gandhi never form part of our history books.
So what was the 'atrocious crimes'? Care to explain?
@@ariadneseven9389 .Do your
own research.
@@raijagat4905 Exactly. No evidence... Thanks for proving my point.
@@ariadneseven9389
Refer massacres during Moplah revolt
You can read opinion of such issues from
" Pakistan or Partition of India "
- B R Ambedkar
@@ariadneseven9389 convertion and destruction of temples, buring of the royal palace of valluvanadu, and taking the rule to the muslim hand in order to establish Islamic state. And fyi I am from Kerala and from Malappuram. But history is history the violence cannot be justified but as a society we have to move on
Gandhi had given overt support to the Khalifat movement of 1920 and became a rebel without a cause. The Ali Brothers were too radical and wanted to establish an Islamic state after British exit.
HOW CATHOLICS CREATED ISLAM👉czcams.com/video/IksrzGhLs7E/video.html
czcams.com/video/L7RWfZoJICc/video.html
A Vatican Priest was killed due to revealing this
@Susmita Nath tell this to Modi to make India super summer
Even today, we have Ali brothers in our midst. We have to find out and eliminate them.
Most impressive research! Totally eye opening video
Very concise and educational lecture. Thank you.
Absolutely brilliant speech , very informative , thanks🙏🙏
Beautifully unveiled the truth by this researcher. Great applause
fantastic analysis. It's high time to give gandhi his right place. Gandhi threw us to the wolves.
thnks chavda sir and shrijen team you are verily following the concept of ancient sangam. which is really inspiring and your guests are really one of the erudite of the India .your discussion are truly in sense thought provoking
Brilliantly done 👏
LAST 3 MINUTES ARE THE GOLD.
Great information and thanks for the presentation. One humble advice to work more on your presentation style. Thank you.
Brilliant lecture! Great usage of analogies!
Netaji Subhas Chandra Bose was possibly a leader like Ataturk Kamal Pasha. That's the reason behind Netaji's resignation as president of Congress. Due to inferiority complex, Gandhiji pressurized him to do so.
A great lecture by a very smart speaker.
The question at the end is very thought provoking and interesting.
I'd like to answer it:
Q. What if India had a leader like Ataturk in place of Gandhi?
A. India would be a genuine secular republic (and not an apartheid state). The muslims, Christians and all those who submit to foreign cultures would be asked to leave Hindustan, or live in a Hindustan where only the indigenous culture would be promoted and protected.
Q2. What If Turkey had a leader like Gandhi in place of Ataturk?
A. All those who were not part of Turkish civilisation (the Greeks, Assyrians, Armenians etc) would be allowed to live in a pseudo-secular Turkish republic, where the native Turkish culture would be suppressed in order to appease the foreign ethnic groups.
Any Turk who opposed this would be called communal.
👍
Perfect answer.
Great analysis that everyone needs to know.
This is very powerful information and history. I was glued to my screen. Thank you.
That analytical evaluation of leadership tags given to MK Gandhi and Ataturk in the end.. was wonderfully incisive and brilliantly insightful..
Brilliant presentation of India's woes, of yesterday, today and tomorrow. Especially succinct is the narration of the history of Ottoman Turks and the liberation of enslaved Turkey by Kemal. Impartial comparisons of the 'Fathers of the nation'
Impressive academic treatment and critical analysis of India's misfortune. Unfortunately the herd of sheep bred by our ancients are still very much alive today. Plus they are more vocal than ever before. Are we ever going to right the wrong? Such a long journey
We are building up getting stronger everyday journey is long for sure but we will reclaim our ancient glory.
@@prankstereddy I like the spirit and optimism. Yes stay positive and support mother India in every way we can. The weight of the burden in now on the shoulders of our youth. The way forward ...........
Turkey was never enslaved by the ottomans but rather protected
@@mohamadwadiwala962 turks kicked out ottomans now .
Fantastic eye opening talk with the potential of a paradigm shift in the national discourse.
Guruji looking handsome.
Very good presentation. The story of the national traitor who indirectly or not so indirectly caused the massacre of many of his fellow countrymen finds example in a few countries. If you dig deeper in the personage's life you will find the root of his enmity. Ghandi, was the son of a successful merchant but someone should search his family line. To me he looks nothing like an Indian and totally like a Maghreb middle eastern. I bet his ancestors were muslims traders who settled in India. Maybe he knew something about his ancestry that we will never know. You don't betray people unless you believe you are not one of them.
@goognamgoognw6637
Here is a response to your convoluted & preposterous thesis.
Either you say that his parents or grandparents were once Muslims, is wrong (his name is Gan`dhi & not that spelling reeled out of your bloody mind).
No Muslim (itinerant) trader remained in India & only the converted Hindus remained, as Muslims. Again you are wrong.
You are used to seeing national leaders, suited, booted & what not. Even this Gan`dhi was like that when he studied law in London (have you heard of London like you heard of Damascus, Cairo or Medina) & was practicing Law in South Africa. After returning to India he was moved by the sight of a majority villagers (then India was a nation of villages; even now there are 600,000 of them) in abject poverty & he adapted their traditional, simple attire - to identify himself as one of them & to be one with them. He began appearing in that attire, with which he went to London as guest of the queen(you may not invite him to your home even). In 1947 when Gan`dhi lived, at least some 300 million Indians (Indian population then) looked "totally like a Maghreb middle eastern" of your description, with your knowledge of a mouse-brain. Does it mean that 300 million Maghreb middle eastern men lived in India then and none else? You can only "bet" as if it is your birth right with your limited exposure & ignorance of the wider world (your utterances reveal it amply, "I bet").
As per your other assumption, indirectly hinting that he (Gan`dhi) might by a bas tard (not born to devout Hindu parents but Maghreb middle easterner or at least his ancestors that is worse), you're totally wrong & I don't know about you (please confirm).
He was not a MUSLIM TRADER but born as the son of a rich diwan(in a princely "state"), otherwise his family who don't even touch a Muslim, would not have sent him to London.
Sir, it was eye opening lecture.
Very well brought out Abhijit! An eye opener!
Thank you Abhijit and Srijan talk to cover this wonderful intellugent master piece with the sequense if his speech very well versed and enlighten an individual innocent mind