Stephen Hawking view on God | Science vs God
Vložit
- čas přidán 22. 01. 2023
- Around 13.8 billion years ago our universe born from the big bang. If big bang was true, then who triggered that.
Many people perceive the struggle to understand our Universe as a battle between science and God. But this is a false dichotomy. Stephen hawing- one of the great scientist. In his final book “Brief Answers to Big questions” explains his view on God in the topic of “Is there a God?”.
And He said during an interview with El Mundo in 2014: “Before we understand science, it is natural to believe that God created the universe. But now science offers a more convincing explanation. What I meant by ‘we would know the mind of God’ is, we would know everything that God would know, if there were a God, which there isn’t. I’m an atheist.”
Even though he is a great scientist, can we accept that what he said is right?
@Klonusk
Mail : Klonusk@gmail.com
#god #stephenhawking #godexists - Věda a technologie
Bro I don't get it why this CZcamsr does not get likes cause he makes such good content
Zero is the sum of positive and negative. Wow! That's an inspiration! ❤🥰
Mankind will never stop asking questions. That’s how God created us
That's what made God God
This video touches on complex topics that intersect science and philosophy, two different domains with divergent methods for approaching truth. I wanted to provide some perspectives on the issues raised:
- Stephen Hawking did not attempt to disprove God using scientific theories. As a scientist, he understood that God is by definition outside the scope of scientific inquiry. However, Hawking preferred empirical scientific explanations over metaphysical ideas.
- There is no scientific consensus that the universe was created from "nothing." Furthermore, the concept of creation lies more in the realm of religion rather than science. Scientifically, one assumes matter and energy exist in different forms rather than being created.
- No evidence in science points to the universe or its rules being consciously created. As mentioned prior, creation falls under a religious framework, not a scientific one. The prevailing scientific view is that the matter and energy preceding the Big Bang expanded to form the observable universe today.
You could not evolve even a single gene randomly from scratch. Let us calculate the probability of doing so. One of the simplest viral RNA sequences is only 400 base pairs long (and represents a very poor ribosomal molecule). Let's say this is all you need to start life, which is obviously not enough (we'd need at least 250 more genes at ~1000 base pairs each for a functional cell). Let there be a trillion trillion Earths, each with an ocean made entirely of amino acids (1.4E24 kg ocean per planet, 110 DA per amino acid, yielding 7.7E45 amino acids per planet). Let the entire sequence of these amino acids be combined into a single chain on each planet, giving the highest possibility of forming at least one correct sequence in the entire chain. Let these Earths randomly recombine their sequence of amino acids at a rate of a million times per second for 100 trillion years (until the last star dies). You are left with approximately 7.7E89 total combinations across this period. Now, let us set up the odds of assembling the correct sequence. The odds that an event occurs can be approximated as one minus the odds the event does not occur after a given number of trials. Let the probability that we get at least one sequence of 400 base pairs in this situation be: P = 1 - (1 - 1/(4^400)) ^ 7.7E89. Compute this formula in Wolfram Alpha to see what the odds are of life arising randomly. To those who will argue the Universe is infinite / infinitely cyclical, this would mean you also believe Planet Mountain Dew, Star Wars, and the Purple Flying Spaghetti Monster were/are/will be real. Yet you still do not believe an unmade creator / eternal designer is real? Let me put it this way. It is more reasonable to believe in a creator God than it is to believe life evolved randomly.
You're ignoring the arguably more bleak probability that a planet has all of the prerequisites to sustain life, not just long enough to support basic microbial life, but for the planet to harbor life long enough for evolution to reach a point where a species becomes sentient. That said, that's a horrendously bad reason for saying there has to be a God. I also never understood how people can tell themselves that the belief in a creator is somehow a more simple, elegant belief than a simply spontaneous universe because, were it true, it creates a host of new questions to be answered.
@@ESFoxwell I’ve come to the conclusion that God is more of some kind of inherent law, or unmade structure, from which all things arise. And it just so happens to be that such a structure / law is capable of producing intent. If natural laws created order from chaos, and humanity, who have intent, how much harder is it to believe a supernatural law, the fundamental law, from which physical reality projects, could produce order and intent? And if it is indeed true, then why not explore it? Tell me the last time we learned something new about the truth and had less questions because of it. You will find such thinking is a property of a dogmatic / religious mentality!
@@ESFoxwell The universe may not be full of intent, that is until you look at life itself. If astronauts were to discover a pile of rocks on the moon vaguely representing the message “HELLO HUMANS,” they could assume such a message was either left there randomly or intentionally. Indeed, the odds of rocks from a nearby volcano landing in that particular arrangement (assuming they are within a 5x46 grid, yielding an odds of about 1/2^(5x46)=1.8E-69 chance) which is still about 3.7E171 times more likely to occur than a single RNA gene arising spontaneously. Just because an ordered design is “naturally occurring” and microscopic does not make an unintentional, or causal, process an appealing solution. What I’m saying is, if you found that message on the moon, what would you believe? Are you in the “natural causes” camp? Not just any arrangement will do.
Unless life is abundent all over the universe. It might start quite easily under the right conditions.
Your lack of evolutionary knowledge is astounding
Thats very intellectually appealing and balanced conclusion for looking at the universe in all modesty. Though I hope you could touch over the point of human consciousness as well. We all believe as if we or other living creatures have 'will' to work against what is physically determined from the time of Bigbang and trust its 'rationality' behind it. If it is indeed a some kind of substance or realm, we truely have something beyond matter, space and energy. However if it is really just about nothing other than those matters, as we are also strictly obeyed by the same principle, it will be irrational to believe that our brain is formed such a way that it can function as the rational tool and do something of its own will. I'm very intrigued by this idea. Nonetheless, these are the questions many brilliants come out with and suggest unthinkable answers. And I think it's wonderful to have open mind over these questions rather than use them as weapons to opposing ideas. I like your videos!
The physics of the universe determine our behavior, including the persistent illusion that we have free will.
@TheShinedownfan21 Yes. According to the suggested hypothesis, our mind can be illusion and have no 'free will', which I have no problem understanding. However, my real question is where does 'rationality' thereby come into play as nobody is actively engaging in purposeful discussions but cause-effects of physical properties. I still do feel like what we access and achieve as human beings are purposeful in many ways. The fact that you are putting that comment to perhaps 'convince others' is because you trust your own rationality and believe that you can access the truth. But in what basis do we trust our own when all of these are byproducts of determined chain reactions of Bigbang?
Here's what truly perplexes and enrages religious people of all faiths: Even if there is a god, it's nothing remotely like what's in your particular superstitious texts. Even if a deist agrees that there might be a god, there's zero chance that it's like the monsters described in the bible, the quoran, the Torah or any other man-made book of nonsense. So, believers, I'll grant you that there's a god, but it's not the one you get to describe and create out of your fevered, terrified minds. Amen.
Read the book 📖 of genesis
Agreed. Although according to some religions the bibles are supposed to be god-made… (or god inspired) There is a little to no chance that any bible on earth is actually real. I am christian, but i still believe that my religion probably isn’t true (it is a 1 in almost a billion chance considering how many religions there are) It is simply the religion i have the *most* faith in, but this statement seems the most-likely. Well put. 👍
yeah that's what seems most reasonable for me. There's too many human made god(s) and goddesses etc and there's literally a 0% chance a real god is accurately described by any of them. But it doesn't mean there isn't some form of a god or gods.
I respectfully disagree. While I look at certain religions, such as Islam, I see an obvious pyramid scheme that got Mohammed quite rich. I don't see that with early Christianity, which implies there could be something to it.
People die for false beliefs because they genuinely believe in them, or at the very least had a very good material gain to get out of it.
The early Christians would've known if it was for real or not yet died for their faith and had no real hope of material gain to really justify it. They could've been crazy, but that wouldn't explain how admittedly well the New Testemant was put together, shared delusions or just weird factors like Saul of Taursus converting and the early Christians at the same time not immediately stoning him.
If there is a God, at least one that cared about humans, I would think he would've made an attempt to communicate with us, so, really, I think it's quite likely one of the major religions would have the moral answers to everything.
Proof that it is false? (I'm Muslim so don't say the bible is false because I already know that)
Hawkins was true about God not having enough time to create the universe, except for him thinking that God works inside time space. God created time. So he is beyond time. That also says that God doesn't need a past creator necessarily. Because there is no past for God. The whole timeline is present to him. He has created the past, the present and the future for his creations.
Than why doesnt he make the future good so people dont starve and have pointless wars, if he is the creater? Also why is the earth not in the center of everything since that is his most talked about creation?
@@denice.a3620He will. Read Revelation
@@denice.a3620Because people have free will they can do good or bad things. But there's a limit to what will by law and morality of human minds. Second to your question. Our world is not defined as the only being in this universe. We are just mirrors of different planes of existence.
@@youraveragejoe6470 people have free will to do bad and good? What is bad and what is good everyone has a different view on that so on what is that based. does it count for babies as well?? And for the mirrors of different places it is not explained that does exist in the book
@@youraveragejoe6470 plus that doesnt explain it still he could have made us so we would not do bad. We are "his" creations after all you guys say, so he created the bad in us he made a mistake in making us than.
Timestamp to Steven hawking view?
Click bait.
7:20 "He (Hawking) concluded that God would not have had time..."
Before I was baptized in California, I met a false god who called himself as crazy monk in Taiwan university's second graduate
student's dormitory when I was watching TV. After that I realized that spiritual persons' existence. So I believed God finally.
What is the sense brother...here there is not such a thing for believing in god by these occurred event😂😂you have gone through a spiritual person so what happened??you will start to believe in the existence of god😂😂......DAMN BROTHER 🙏
8:40
How about speed of black hole?
“Absence of Evidence does not mean Evidence of Absence”
Dr. Carl Segan
also, there isn't much absence of evidence, as Eucharists have turned into heart tissue and AB type blood quite a few times.
9:12 "I believe that human minds need it [God]" - that's right, as a child's mind needs Santa Claus, the Tooth Fairy or ... whatever it needs.
Yes there seems to be something innate in humans since the beginning of time to believe in this delusion
Guys, just let people believe what they believe and don’t harass them for it. They wont hurt you. 😊
@@mario_fan-qq4hq But many do harass atheists for their beliefs, just check this comment section.
@@somethingelse9228 I mean don’t harass ANYONE for their beliefs. I am an atheist.
the universe required no creator
Your life is the most miracle God ever did, much more than the creation of the universe
@@Gustavocalifornia101 what a ridiculous statement. no equivalency there
@@petermartell568 do you really think that the whole universe, stars, planets, black holes, the dimensions like space and time, the laws os physics like gravity and the quantum world, the humans being and life itself, came all by chance?
All of this matchs perfectly in a structure that even can be described in the mathematics. Are you such ignorant to not aknowlodge The God as the creator?
@@Gustavocalifornia101 No I do not think that everything came by chance. I see how natural forces and changing conditions caused these things. Chemical interactions ambient temperature fluctuations, physical forces such as gravity causing ecretions to form stars and planets, evolutionary patterns driven by natural/sexual selection, mutations, epigenetics, etc, over long periods of time. I do not believe in a conscious, compassionate all-powerful, spaceless eternal hidden sky fairy had anything to do with anything. Fortunately, I do not have your level of gullibility to believe such an absurdity. Sad that you do. And mathematics is the discovery of man recognizing patterns
@@Gustavocalifornia101 some people think they are being smart and progressive by saying God is not real…
No matter how you try to explain the universe, there still has to be a cause..
And the structure of the universe show sings of a highly intelligent structure despite entropy.
Science has no need for supersition.
Do you think nothing exists outside of science?
@@SaltyTubeSock Yes
@@SaltyTubeSockthere likely are some alternative dimensions or universes out there where some act of nature we can’t explain yet through science caused our universe to appear. A sky wizard philosopher who’s completely all powerful creating the universe is ridiculous and illogical. The Bible is moral philosophy, nothing more
Which universe are you referring to; there has been not one but many, and they did not come from nothing but dependent on on other factors.
where tf does that particle before the big bang come from tho
The question assumes that there was a place for it to come from. And that problem is infinite because even if you had an answer, the question remains. It's not a question of why or how it simply is.
I really appreciate your videos. Hopefully your subscribers and viewers will keep increasing 🇴🇲 ❤
Humanity is on a journey and the unmistakable target and inevitable destination is Enlightenment: an Ultimate Answer to the Big Question of life, the Universe and Everything.
"The Theory of Everything would be the ultimate triumph of human reason, for then we would truly know the Mind of God" - Stephen Hawking.
Subsequently the Thing-in-itself at the centre and origin of the Universe will be revealed, in all of its beauty and simplicity, and all the Supernatural Sky-Gods will vanish in a puff of logic - leaving Humanity Enlightened and liberated from the chains of primitive superstition for the rest of time.
Sike, why can't humans make a nonliving thing into a living thing(consciousness, also explain)? If we can't even make a nonliving thing turn to a living thing with all of our knowledge, why trust nonintelligent processes to suddenly make DNA which is at least 3.2 billion thingamajigs long without a conscious mind to decide and guide it in the first place? Also, we can talk about the moral argument if you want.
Also, God is not a sky-god you atheists assume to believe lol, God is MORE than that. First of all, He exists outside the Universe and sustains everything.
@@user-qui91pvsw which god(s) specifically are u talking about?
also we are doing that with AI
God is a spirit,energy.
Where his parts come from???
I like the video and you earned a sub.
corresponds to the fear of god which reduces crimes, make a powerful laws in the whole world for those crimes. Then this god thing will come to an end.
9:55 At the same time, many people do bad things thinking they are good things that their god wanted
that's what's unfortunate about religions ... there is also some bad. the terrifying thing here is bad can varies .. from simple .. to absolutely catastrophic .
@@cgiguyWell, people will believe what they believe.
What is the possible goal of nature. IS IT TO UNDERSTAND ITSELF?
Is there even a goal?
Your last question, "who created God?" ...Like you cook fish 🐠, who cooked you? ... Creator n Creature is not same. U cannot apply same rules on creator n Creature..
Yes.... Who created God? This my all time question from childhood when my mother told me about god.... I thought I would find the answer in future with the help of highly qualified peoples....
But now I understand that our brain doesn't support that "answer" ... because of our limitations in this reality of life.......
Well I'm happy that I know many things better than average people who believe in "faith"
imam Ali was asked how do you see God he replied :
Eyes can never see God, but hearts with proper belief can recognize God. God is close to everything, but not attached to things; is away from everything, but is no stranger to them; is a speaker, not through thinking or thought; is determined, not by desire or wish; is creator/maker, not by hands or legs; is kind and friendly, and that is not secret or hidden; is great not by oppression; can see but not with external senses; is kind, but not touchy; the heads and faces fall down (prostrate) due to God’s greatness; and the hearts are restless due to fearing God
Creator did not fully fact check this video. Aristarchus lived 300bc, not 3000bc.
The physics stinks, too
@@davidkurz2977coz you can't understand it
YAH!!
BUT CAPTION IS ALL WAY CORRECT!!
@@davidkurz2977 may be it is because physics is not your cup of coffee
Science proves the how and what of the universe, while god proves the why and who of everything
Sometimes it feels scientists and science students has very limited or restricted thoughts self imposed on themselves when they illogically tries to negate an extra-universe entity called GOD without a rational response to the biggest question how anything including matter, energy, space, time and nothing came into existence. Can anyone has logical and firm reply how matter is created, how life came into being, how consciousness created itself!!!!? Biggest questions, not for those who are preoccupied in thinking themselves to be thinkers and scientists.
All your questions will be answered eventually. I'm sure there will not be any god needed in those equations.
we don't exist for nothing is all we need to understand....
@@millepill typical refuting response.
@@shaoorehsan9114 Well, so far there hasn't been a need for a god to answer any scientific question. In the natural sciences, one always continues to ask questions and further increase knowledge continuously. Eventually we will get answers to all scientific questions like how the universe came into being, how it will end, what fundamental particles exist, how all forces including gravity work and how life started. It is surprising that religious people think they have answers to everything by reading a book that was written in a time when we had no idea about physics like today.
@@jeffriesj75 There is no other meaning to life than to live it. We humans look for reasons for everything. I feel sorry for people who cannot find their own meaning in life. We are insignificant in and to the universe. All that exists is cause and effect; biological, chemical or physical.
Why we ask , "who" created the ....
Why is always "who"
Why "who" is necessary ?
Plz somebody answer my silly questions
Where did zillions of tons of mass come from? And different types of mass.
I wouldn’t ask the Pope’s opinion on Cosmology. Nor do I put great stock in Hawking’s religious views. The question of Go’d existence is not a scientific issue.
However. The Vatican Does have a telescope/observatory.
It's called "The Vatican Telescope"... ?
I like _klonusk_ . Interesting and none of these videos see to be aimed at any particular age group which is nice
the big bang occurred around 14billion years ago.
by definition 14billion years is infinitesimally small on an infinite time scale , even if we say time started at the big bang.
so our our life and the life of the universe is so small it cannot exist.
God is a psychological coping mechanism invented by men, a symbolic character in the dramas we create about our own desires and fears. Just because Gold is a product of the human mind doesn't mean he isn't "real," other products of the human mind, such as language, law, art and customs, are real and not to be dismissed.
That’s the thing though, being in this earth isn’t about self. Because if it’s about self, that’s exactly how you wind up with people using God(of any religion) to justify their own personal desires even if if it’s wrong
Then where did people come from
The big bang sent soooo much recourses- wow ❤
Big bangs usually produce trouble.
But that time it was different. ❤❤❤
Actually men believe because they encounter , there are many Sumerian and Ancient texts that tells the the visitors of the stars and even the greatest and genius civilisations believed in God
So due to the title I'm inclined to add , the Bible said "the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God." " theory says nothing created something , and it spread out based on dark matter spacing plus solar systems .. (Essentially). The word is a vibration, on a wave length far greater than what we understand it's crazy science can agree 1 plus -1 is zero. But we can't recognize that vibrations/frequencies , are what pull our universe (s). God constructed his law for order , it would make sense the universe has law and order. I'm just saying multi theory and black holes are amazing to learn about. I'm failing to see the disconnect between religion and science. Maybe you can't fully understand the universe until you try to look at it from all angles . I'm just saying there's a connection between God and God's alike and our solar system(s)
It is a strange thing that no one has control over the universe, even if there were other universes. A powerful and resourceful being would not emerge from a another universe and become intelligent, resourceful, and resourceful to the point of learning how to control universes and times, learning how to create new universes, and learning technologies above everything we can imagine and have perfect biology. It gives him the possibility to live forever. The idea that our universe is out first and only one and there is not successful beings that overcome the nature of everything still confuses me. Or maybe becuse God gave us these perfect conditions and all of this is not luck.
These answers came from the mind of Man called science. However there are things beyond our understanding. Unexplained phenomena that seems to defy logic. Things like feelings and emotions. Thought. Life and death. Good and evil. These concepts are what Professor Hawking wonder about.
Him?
Well, he knows the answer now undoubtedly
(O people, an example is presented, so listen to it. Indeed, those you invoke besides Allah will never create [as much as] a fly, even if they gathered together for that purpose. And if the fly should steal away from them a [tiny] thing, they could not recover it from him. Weak are the pursuer and pursued) quran 22 . surat alhaj(the pilgramige)
Rubber Dinghy Rapids, bro.
Hawking said creating negative and positive, but man and woman is not created by such logic. And this topic mentioned about where is God from? God is existing from the beginning when there is no logic. And every life and matter are created by God.
Even nothing has to come from something no matter what god is real 🖤
Nothing by definition doesn't come from anywhere.
Science is never about proving God is or is not. Science and religion are two completely different spheres of knowledge each trying to explain causality in it's own different ways. So bringing in an argument like a scientist does a research to prove or disapprove God wouldn't be a logical enough argument.
hawking stated that
'philosophy' is dead -
only science and materialism
explain the whole universe,
little that he knew that
he had proclaimed his
own flawed, atheistic philosophy.
Everyone has a flawed philosophy to some degree or another.
@@freznelite Absolutely agree. Hawking's 'flawed' philosophy - being an eminent figure - had added fuel to atheistic movement to a 'greater' degree.
"They professed to be wise but
they are nothing but fools!"
Increase the frequency of videos to show CZcams that you're more active and ultimately let it's algorithm to push your videos and add hook in the starting 30 sec of the video
Hawkings concept of god is the multiverse, totally un-provable...I kinda find this amusing , the two sides are not so different these days.
EVEN SIMULATION THEORY IS VALID, WHO CREATES THE SIMULATION?
Elon
If you truly have any intelligence than you will realize there is a grand architect of the universe and life
Up until 9 minutes it was great. Then came this god thing. Why?
Thanks for discussing these notions. People generally believe that belief in God is contrary to science. In fact, it is the most logical conclusion. There is a starting point for everything. It does not matter what religion you belong to, the fact is that God is a deity that exists and is uncreated. Even if someone does not believe in any particular religion, he / she will definitely reach this unavoidable conclusion. It's all about thinking without bias.
false. Belief in any god is illogical. No proof or evidence for any of them. Also false...you don't know if there's a starting point for everything. Thts an assertion you've made with no proof or evidence of being true. The universe could be very well infinite...you or I don't know tht. This guy in the video saying before the big bang there was nothing isn't even scientific. Science doesn't even say there was "nothing". How can something be created from "nothing", when no one can explain what "nothing" is
Well said 👍
tht shit is not well said...lol...its a bunch of bs tht christians want to believe, but its nonsense@@mario_fan-qq4hq
Pigeon hole 🕳️ ,the beginning? 😵💫🌀💭
You can never remove God from the equation. Well who created the big bang, the vast universe, and most importantly the human beings. I feel sorry for Steven Hawkins he was a great man who endured tremendous suffering. I truly believe he is with our holy father providing him comfort. God is all powerful he could create the universe as quickly as he wanted to. How does Steve Hawkins know that God didn't have enough time to create the universe!!!!
God is so all powerful that he is infinitely beyond the boundaries of science and human understanding. He is the greatest magician.
I'm really tired of hearing about the anthropomorphized concept of god. The assumption of a "who" created the universe is ridiculous. A more appropriate question would be "Why was the universe created." Science has the answer, not magic.
If you are a "Who" and not a "What," then why would you think your origin would not be from a Who???
@@maskofsorrow I am a 'Who' because my parents were 'Whos". That does not say anything about a supposed creator of the universe.
@@chaschoune And just who was the original parents??? That says everything about the Creator.
@@maskofsorrow there's a theory that the universe came from a long line of deaths and rebirths, expanding and shrinking based on the balance of natural forces. it's possible that it's creation was produced by itself and not an otherworldly force
@@victortang5076 And what started it in the first place? ie. What birthed it originally? Where did its consciousness and intelligence come from?
Hmmm. If a theologian is not the man I'd go to for information about physics, why would I go to a physicist for information about theology?
I wouldn't go to a theologian for "information" about ANYTHING. Google "faith"
@@davidkurz2977 By faith, Google is the authoritative epistemology.
Theologians are about as useful as master Minecraft speed runners. Sure, it's cool to some people, but ultimately irrelevant information. Physics actually explain the world around us, it's not just some form of entertainment.
@@ESFoxwell Physics explains the structures and laws of matter but it cannot help you discover why you should not commit suicide.
@@polemeros is that an argument that religion prevents suicide? I'd be very interested in you quantifying that belief.
Is there a cow ?
Just because science cannot prove the existence or non-existence of God, doesn’t mean he is real or unreal. Faith is being sure of what we hope for and certain of what we can’t see. If a person doesn’t want to believe in God, he or she does not have to. Science today says they are up to 11 dimensions they use mathematics to speculate about these other realms. God and Heaven are in another dimension.
What is distracting you from understanding it its "Time" which is inside the creation(Existence), forget about it for a moment, now Nothingness(NoTime Nonexistence, absolute absence of something you can call Existence, no container, no void because that would be Existence), the nothingness would persist forever because cannot be nothing else. You can infer there was always something because there is not nothingness because nothingness can only exist as nothingness, the nothingness never existed because there is Existence and the Existence cannot come from nothingness because nothingness can only persist and exist as nothingness. Therefore you can infer the Creation(Existence) did not come from nothingness because nothingness can only exist as nothingness, if True that there never was such as thing as nothingness THEN the Existence its primordial its always been there because there was not nothingness before. If there ever was nothingness before Creation THEN the creation could not exist, the nothingness can only be nothingness and if nothingness ever existed then nothingness would persist until now. If there never was nothingness THEN the primordial Existence was never created. If the Existence was never created THEN its Eternal(No Beginning, No End). How do you know if has not End, because time and creation did come from that primordial Existence if our universe is the only thing there is then if the universe become nothingness Still the Existence will Exist and persist because the nothingness(Absolute absence of Existence) never Existed. Its complicated as proving 1+1=2 which is 360 pages long.
Hawkings wasnt that intelligent to take on his word, he was just a glorified scientist because of his disability, awesome work due to dedicated time to his work and the UK culture that tend to always glorify people which is not bad thing. Also he probably hated the idea of god because of his illness. I like Christopher Langan's work better.
S🙄 , After All this Beautiful Illustrations & Explanations , You Still Remain As Agnost 🤔
Time
Space
Cant help but go on in all directions
And any and everywhere are the center of both
Everything is for something else and a result of something else
Good and evil cant help but exist but you choose the one you want
If all matter just vanished would intelligence or potential for it vanish
If it couldnt vanish with matter then intelligence had to be before matter
And it had to be anyway
99 percent of the universe is space so if intelligence is only in life itself then intelligence is the smallest matter in the universe but still runs the show
Thought is not matter
So what was first thought or matter
So if matter makes itself.....
I believe in GOD infinity percent
But if GOD didnt exist i dont know how time and space still woulnt exist forever in all directions
What pencil could add or erase either one or erase intelligence
who created that god another creator GOD, there are dozens of them mr conman, and when you remove all the creators from nothing zero still is there with infinite mathematics in its form mr conman
study hibbs particles the gods particles
All shall know me
N0 1 w1ll t3ll another 😊
9:56 - I disagree . Proof ? Look at the middle east and all religion related wars . Since we have the capacity to “ believe” anything without proof , humans clash because of it ; different religions . So i completely disagree ..
History is your proof lol
The statement God created the universe in 6 days in the bible and God created the universe through big bang or other method in billions of years are both correct statement. In God’s perspective He created everthing in 6 days in his own time. In Einstein’s theory of relativity time depends in the observer in two individuals and can be different if one is at motion. So his 6 days of creation in the bible can be a billion of years to us. I saw one astrophysicist said that we are still on the 7th day of God because in the bible from 1st day to 6th day it was describe that the sun rises and the sun sets. But on the 7th day when God rest the sun was not written it sets.
God Bless us all
It seems y'all don't understand and yes none of us do coz at the end of the day God is God...He answers to nobody...you don't expect Him to appear to anyone that does believe His existence...He owes nobody an explanation whatsoever...He gives He takes...He creates and He destroys...No human being can comprehend His power .. it's sucide... knkw this and have peace
BTW Quran answer all is question why not read it
God is what is, lmao it's hilarious.
What we see Expirence is what God is. Reality is one whole.
There is no point in debating whether God exists or not. It is more than obvious that God exists. You don't need to have many studies to come to the conclusion that everything that exists has an intelligent mind behind it . Ignoring the existence of God because I don't like and don't want life to have a Creator is the same thing as ignoring his human existence . The whole universe , our solar system , the planet earth and everything that exists in show clearly , very clearly that God exist .
you mean the christian god? islam? hindu? how about the norse gods? zues perhaps? You have not seen all the evidence and yet you already conclude that a single all powerful being exist.
"it is more than obvious" is one of the worse evidence you can have.
@@chaschoune You cannot evolve even a single gene randomly from scratch. Do the math. The creation of life, and the evolution of life, is either guided or obeys some other law which eliminates almost all of the randomness. Life evolves over time, and we witness this progression, but I am telling you, there is not enough time nor material in this Universe to evolve one new gene randomly.
@@freznelite Nobody said that a single gene can randomly evolve from scratch. Millions of years is an incommensurate amount of time and your incredulity is not an argument.
@@chaschoune So you are agreeing the formation of life is not random? If so, then I would encourage you to accept the following facts:
1. Life itself requires a Design File, which is executed in the form of genetic code.
2. The Design File for the theoretical minimum viable organism is roughly 250 genes, averaging 1000 base pairs each.
3. The Design File did not happen by chance (i.e. as the result of a purely random process).
How do you propose such a large Design File could have arisen? Show me which mathematical / chemical / physical / biological law, that creates such a design file from scratch, and I will believe it could have happened through natural processes in this world alone. A complex design file implies Intent. Intent implies Intelligence. Intelligence implies a lot of things. Show me how a complex design file does not require intent.
And if you still think time is the explanation, let me tell you, 100 trillion years is not enough time for a trillion trillion organisms each with a genome the size of an ocean to evolve even one brand new gene purely randomly.
Let us calculate the probability of doing so. One of the simplest viral RNA sequences is only 400 base pairs long (and represents a very poor ribosomal molecule). Let's say this is all you need to build one new functional gene. Let there be a trillion trillion genomes, each of which contain a genetic code that weighs as much as the Earth's ocean (1.4E24 kg ocean, 110 DA per amino acid, yielding 7.7E45 amino acids per genome). Let the entire sequence of these amino acids be combined into a single chain, giving the highest possibility of forming at least one correct sequence in each chain. Let these massive organisms randomly recombine their sequence of amino acids at a rate of a million times per second for 100 trillion years (until the last star dies). You are left with approximately 7.7E89 total combinations across this period. Now, let us set up the odds of assembling one new, correct sequence. The odds that an event occurs can be approximated as one minus the odds the event does not occur after a given number of trials. Let the probability that we get at least one sequence of these particular 400 base pairs in this situation be: P = 1 - (1 - 1/(4^400)) ^ 7.7E89. Compute this formula in Wolfram Alpha to see what the odds are of randomly evolving one new gene from a trillion trillion ocean-sized genomes after 100 trillion years.
The best example we have of evolution is viral. Viruses steal genetic code from their hosts. Sometimes they create new genes in a semi-random fashion through recombination of existing code, copy defects, and even radiation defects. But they are not building entirely new genes from scratch (i.e. a brand new 400 base pair gene) without pulling this from their host's genetic code. So they are able to adopt genetic code, and evolve by attacking their hosts, but they are not able to synthesize a purely random new gene.
there is no scientific observation that (dis)proves God
There’s no evidence to prove anything we’re just guessing we will never know
It would seem that whatever is or isn't, is or isn't. wasn't or was.
If this Jesus guy really existed, and if Jesus actually "rose from the dead", then Jesus was the first and only Zombie. So that would make it "quantum reality & quantum unreality".
I "case my rest"... As with everything, "quantum interesting". Thank You & Best Regards
st hawking use first word
soul or god is enerrgy intigrated frim vampire change
The primary cause
*Clicks on video*
*Dislikes*
*Leaves*
1:42
But but but, the earth IS the center of the (visible) universe?
Every point in the Universe is the centre.
the orbits the gravity the elements weights , who design them all. who is the programmer .
Yes.
God was needed for the universe to be created, not believing in God is not logical, it’s foolishness, because if i had no idea what a phone was and I stumbled on to one, and after examining it I discover that everything is intentional to function properly, the most logical conclusion has to be that there’s a mind behind it, you can’t acknowledge a creation and not acknowledge the creator, if you read the Bible you’ll discover that God is neither limited by time nor, a thousand years is like a day and a day is like a thousands years, all I know is that when we all die we’ll discover the truth, and I’m not risking eternity for a 100 year, if i believe in God, die and it ends up there’s nothing after death, it’s better than not believing, dying and ending up in hell
What are the odds of assembling the Big Ben Bell Tower from an ocean of Legos shaken back and forth a trillion trillion times? Effectively zero.
According to Christianity there is no difference between a non-believer and someone who believes in some other God, both are going to hell. From that perspective, how is it better to choose to believe? The reality is that religious people are really not all that different from us non-believers. We can sit down and agree that thousands of Gods aren't real, it's only one that most people on the planet would disagree with me on.
Also, there's a lot of irony in your phone analogy. Religion quite clearly has the fingerprints of humanity, created by us for us. We live on one planet, in one solar system, in one galaxy, in a universe so vast we can't fully grasp it, and yet we still find ways to tell ourselves we're at the center of it. How foolish.
@@ESFoxwell We know almost nothing, Foxwell. It is equally foolish to say there is nothing to spiritual truth, as it is to reduce the breadth of reality to a narrow religious philosophy. Since you are in the non-religious mindset. Let's say for one moment that there actually was something out there with sovereignty - and the way that force works is very strange. Would you be willing to search for it yourself? If you go looking, you will find out there is something working among men. What it is I cannot tell you. But I see it, and have experienced it, in a way that creates good (despite the odds in favor of chaos). And you won't know it unless you actually want to. So I encourage you to explore, use your brain, your heart, and think. Test it for yourself and see what happens. What is the worst that could happen to you? That you would learn nothing in the process.
@@freznelite I'm all for searching for spiritual truths, I just expect the same standards as any other claim. Make a hypothesis based on your observations, test that hypothesis, and examine the results. "Feelings" and "personal experiences" open a Pandora's box of charlatans. We have to rely on what we can observe AND authenticate. People of the religious mindset struggle with that second part, in my personal experience.
@@ESFoxwell What you are saying is correct. I also desire to be an "objective" witness to clear and unquestionable events. Unfortunately, there is no single test you can apply for any spiritual concept. There isn't one test that proves there is a God without a shadow of a doubt, or that He knows you, or even cares. But it seems to me that spiritual truth is something that is revealed personally, rarely being objectively true to others (but you can know it is true within yourself). If you are dealing with an intelligence greater than yourself, which has something for your life, then it is expedient that you respond, and it is expedient that you ask something from it. If you could ask for anything from such an intelligence, what would it be? Just try doing so consistently for a few years. Perhaps even less. Whatever happens, make of it as you wish, you will think of it as a tremendous blessing or a great curse. Herein lies the power of choice. Many things you cannot choose to happen, so you will ride as a willing participant or a stubborn objector. I have been both in my life. Could it be that the way we choose to interpret our experiences makes us irredeemably blind to objective reality? Yes, such is the nature of human consciousness. Yet I can tell you, in good conscience, something invisible has protected me (even physically), guided me, showed me things that I otherwise would not have known. This is more along the lines of spiritual experience rather than a purely physical operation. One could argue it was all just coincidence, but I have to admit these kind of things happen too often and they tie together, creating new understanding and appreciation... almost like a "somebody" planned it that way. My plans have been foiled, and to my great surprise they have been replaced with something better. For me to not have faith after those experiences would be illogical. And I cannot convince you of my experiences even if I tried! It is not on a tape recorder. And it is not by men or by our own reasoning we will arrive at this understanding, but by a gift. May we prepare ourselves to receive that gift! This is very different than the scientific process. But somehow no less valid for the individual. So to our friends who are doggedly religious, perhaps they ought to be shaken up, and honestly start looking for what is real. And for those who insist on manifestation, may that which is greater than us release the cords of doubt that bind, and may we honestly start looking for what is real in life. I challenge you to try! And keep trying!
If god existed there would be no need to prove his existence
Everything is a illusion....I think so
GOD SAYS HE IS THE BEGINNING AND THE END THERE IS NO ONE WHO MADE GOD
indians didn't
good point
God is god anywho is all of goodness as well as evils and play us like fools to its dicy desires.
Seems to be another dream concept.we are that called god.i never had a testimony of a personal God when with the church.we the infinite are always incarnating
If God does not exist then we won't exist..
I am evidence God exists. The universe is evidence God exists.
Of course
THE CREATION IS BEING THE CREATOR ITSELF
God is out of time and our universe logic becuse he made it. The fact we have consciousness, should be a great proof. dont you feel you came from somewhere to be a living thing, and dont you feel death is not the end?
Hawkins does not see a beautiful mind, planning thinking designing his own body also, God showed in his body, what a chaotic creation could be, a creative mind has given us a perfect shape, unlike of Hawkings. I am sorry for Hawkings to say this, with his distorted look, he would not find a *fine mind* who brought His creation to perfection
Bible says god created heavens and earth. I think that is the simpliest answer.
God is real u donr need to see him to believe him but as for me his love is my biggest truth
Great content! thanks!
Live long, you will get answer. 200 years ago there was no concept of black hole, 100 years ago it was proposed and now proved. So wait and creat question u will get answer. The bad thing of God concept is; it's preventing u from questioning and gives only one answer The GOD😅😅😅