Video

Still at age 70, I wish to PARTICIPATE in outdoors science practical with math practical to parallel the throwing of balls, to understand projectiles, progression to larger arcs, to finally understanding placing an object into orbit. ... Hands on practical math, while enjoying the learning of gravity and mechanics of motion. Yep, an old guy still wants to learn.

Of course

The thing is, you are assuming a lot of things and assuming more thing based on those things.

It isn’t

This could be explain by distance action force

Space time could not bend because ether like things is exist and so vaccum could not bend

Einstein's space - time concept is wrong , orbits around the sun generate due to the interference of gravitational waves and making gravitational rings just like in practical of Newton's ring

Gravity is Not a force but it cause time ⏰

Great, except one comment. At 15:16, W+ bosons decay into a positron and a neutrino, not a neutron.

Typical nonsense (from other nonsense textbooks and videos): in the moving reference system the clock is ..at rest- do you morons understand it? It "moves" only in the reference system at rest (for example on Earth/laboratory as a stationary one). The Lorentz formula is just a mathematical transformation as it cannot be otherwise,i.e. any physical change of the clock's mechanism is contr the Relativity principle! The clocks on moving planes react to a difference in gravitational potential between Earth's ground and the plane's height.

why is the speed of EM waves constant?

For those who still didnt understand watch: time dialation explained for gen-z

This is far best explanation i saw and the only video where i understood gravity

I understand that the mass bends the space and the light follows the space but in the case of equivalent example, where the space ship under high acceleration, why does the light bend? Does the acceleration bend the space as well?

One Karen after 9:21 mins of watching this. "Yeah but you still see in 2D though."

I enjoyed the commercial in the middle and am always very happy to see clean water being delivered to Africa! What I do not understand is if African's were the first civilizations, why are there no wells dug down to clean ground water? Jesus said, greater is he who serves, than he who is served! Will you be ready when Jesus comes! Yes! Clean water! Amen!

I get it but it doesn't make sense it's a parodox

It boggles our minds but it's simple time is a perception.

Wow they want us to believe this it's all a theory not fact ....

Go buy your instincts and experiments not only math !

Math is not a proven factor of it all !?

The issue is math doesn't explain everything it only explains math ?

Because light has particles ? Hello it was bent so it has a physical property showing a proven solution.b

im pretty sure a lot of ppl will pause the videos and go read the comments about the "fat man"😂

2:52 white drart

Insane

Light travel in plane space in stright line,but in curved space ( formed due to heavy mass ) it travels in curved path

Wait, I'm no expert on this field but if space-time is only bend, then how couldn't light escape a blackhole, because if blackholes only bend space-time, and if it's not infinity then wouldn't there be a time that light escape it? If it's infinitely bent then light wouldn't escape like how they say, so does blackholes bend space-time infinitely or what?

15:14 mistake!!!! W+ decays into a beta+ and a neutrino.

How would it measure the same speed value, where is the explanation to that. Why doesnt light get the same measurement as the ball....

Besides the fact that since a black hole was observed a few years ago, Einstein's "Theories of Relativity" and anything grown from them cannot be true? The good 'ol ridiculous nonsense that gravity or speed alters time. Even though it is impossible to test for falsity, there is no evidence of it, and everything anyone ever has presented as evidence either is obviously simply the result of things moving faster without needing to push against gravity (duh) or stress-related body changes (duh). Also which always are the inverse of what would happen if Einstein's idea about speed/gravity and time were correct. Then there's things we see about some planets' orbits around other stars. No one ever thinks "maybe light is distorted because there's dozens of lightyears between them and us" or "maybe the massive radiation storm between stars is changing the image" or "maybe it's just, y'know _gravity."_ Nope, it's always "See!? It's shifting in time-space due to its speed!" even when it's slower than planets in our own solar system... It's kinda like how people believe the idiotic idea that mass increases with speed even though all measurements and calculations treat mass as a constant and objects moving through the sky or space are never mentioned as having different masses as their speeds change, no matter how extreme. With the obvious answer being that speed increases weight in the direction of movement as weight is essentially an object pushing against another. Not a change in mass. As particularly well proven by how guns are designed and ballistic calculations are made. Namely the fact that to impart more energy through a bullet, you have to increase the bullet's mass. So, if velocity increases mass, it's so tiny or starts at such a high velocity that it's imperceptible to human technology and therefore we have no way to test it. Not that the "Theories of Relativity" were ever theories in the first place. They can't be tested for falsity, therefore they can't be theories. They just have "theory" in their literal name. Which was quite clever and definitely unethical. You know how Einstein tested his "theory"? By riding a horse past an apprentice and having him ride a horse past Einstein. He determined that it felt like time passed differently based on whether he was watching the horse or riding it. _THAT_ is his "test" and why he believes it. Speaking of, aren't these "theories" some that he gave up on because he couldn't figure out a mathematical way for them to be true?

For the same reason gluons affect other sub-atomic particles. That's my guess. We'll know for sure eventually, but we probably don't know now or if so, it's being kept secret.

your presentation skills are impeccable, always a pleasure to watch!

Humans have mass

Use the Cavendish Experiment to demonstrate how curved spacetime deflects light just like it defects the two small balls. I DARES YOU! If it is CURVATURE the light will be bent by the curved spacetime around the large balls. If it is a FORCE, the mass of light is null so it will not be deflected. SHOW US LIGHT BEING BENT BY CURVED SPACETIME IN A CLASSROOM or A LAB with the Cavendish Experiment.. Simple enough to demostarate. DO IT.

Ai and digital figureprint indent or whatever knows it as well

I don't understand why it has to be space time and not ether

Problematically your definition of time could be better thought of as, a dynamic operator rather than an orthogonal direction. In the observer model, it's merely a convention that is used to organize entangled sub systems of the universe into A more stasis -based configuration. Which is more entropicly favorable to the observers.

What I think is that science will never prove the existence or non-existence of God (philosophy/religion won't either). BUT, it can show that many interpretations of God we currently have do not match up with what we know about the universe. All we need is one positive piece of evidence...but no one can agree what that might look like. An old man sitting on the clouds looking down at us? Not clouds? OK, how about near the sun? Or in the next galaxy over? Inside a black hole? Beyond the CMB? Not a man? A woman? A dog? An octopus? An alien? I enjoy a philosophical/religious discussion, but there are conversations that are either not interesting OR get aggressive/violent. I stay away from those.

I'm not an expert but I love how, unlike quantum, Einstein explains everything with simple logic not statistical modeling.

Keep it up guys , u provide great content

Great channel

the speed of light is constant, but does change depending on the observer, yes. The train example with them signing papers doesn't make sense, because the particles of light from the bulb would be moving at the speed of light plus the speed of the train. What that means is, from the observer on the platform, they would see the light traveling in the direction towards the front of the train travel a further distance, but the light would hit its destination (the person signing the form) the same time it reaches the other.

First vid I've seen that refers to the typical 2D illustration of space time warping. About 2 mos. ago I was 'complaining' about the typical illustration of this concept in a conversation. I also said that IMO, the typical illustration of the effect of black holes is also misleading. I think that a more accurate representation would be something small (like a speck of dust representing the singularity) suspended exactly at the center of a huge round ball. The ball surface is the event horizon, the point at which nothing that crosses it can escape the gravity of the singularity. That is because the gravity of the singularity would affect space-time in all directions, not just vertically as shown in the typical illustration. The idea that a black hole is some sort of funnel shaped thing that looks like a drain makes no sense to me.

😅😮😮😅😮😅😅well information good show you 😅😅😅

Seems to be another dream concept.we are that called god.i never had a testimony of a personal God when with the church.we the infinite are always incarnating

Goo₫ vide

A small set of 7 colors creates different spectrums of a beautiful world. A small set of 7 notes creates a completely different spectrum of beautiful music. Probably the same situation exists in the microcosm. At the initial stage, a large family of particles is not required. The Standard Model of particle physics (as the primary state of Nature) is too complex to be true.

Einstein said that reality is an illusion

In conclusion: Einstein was high.