Episode 2518 CWSA 06/26/24
Vložit
- čas přidán 25. 06. 2024
- Supreme Court Decisions, Trump versus Biden debate, and more
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
If you would like to enjoy this same content plus bonus content from Scott Adams, including micro-lessons on lots of useful topics to build your talent stack, please see scottadams.locals.com for full access to that secret treasure. - Zábava
Your conversation with Mr. black proved that you can't have a conversation with someone who believes the news is real.
He didn’t arrive with the stance of “ok, mind’s open, convince me”. He came in with bookmarked URLs for defending ‘his case’. He came in ready and on the defensive. He was ready in case any impure thought was attempted.
All other contexts were met with ‘define (what you said)’.
Win. You wanted to win Michael. You interrupt as a technique and use the space to diffuse. You won’t acknowledge motivated thinking and money and media capture and regulators and government capture. Not in your world these prime mover things.
You can't have conversations with people who change their birth name from Schwartz to get into comedy/tv
I think he has been fed lines and as an actor faithfully responds in character. Contradictory positions to known factors that contradict them and requiring proofs while providing none. Disagreeable beta b syndrome.
MIB does not have people in his life who are as reasonable, logical, and well-read as Scott. So there was no contest.
The conversation with Michael Ian Black is textbook for how a friendly conversation with a narcissist goes: inability to do reality testing, inability to handle nuance, and improper speech patterns. It would be 'gaslighting' if it was intentional, but since it was not an intentional deception, that's the wrong word. Certainly a mindbender regardless!
Autism
Yes, a card carrying member of the narcissist club. But they do get along well together. My G mother and G father were both narcissist and got along great. Did not have the same core values but shared social experience. One shared fact was that my Dad was an unwanted child and therefore had no rights to any support. All clothing was handowns from older bother. No Chistmas gifts. Fed leftovers after family had finished meal. No money for school or church supplies. You get the gist of it.
"Reality is that which, when you stop believing in it, doesn't go away.”
― Philip K. Dick
He constantly asked for definitions, , old leftist strategy.
The conversation with Black proves that people believe what they are conditioned to believe and releasing a belief is the same as releasing their identity.
"...people love to preserve their mistakes and are often heartily vexed to be set right."
Edmund Gosse
Ideologically driven
Michael was disingenuous in a condenscending way . But with the sound off he looked like he was having a nervous breakdown
You are giving that man way too much credit. He acted like a very rude obnoxious 5-year-old
Your discussion on how scrolling Reels is becoming an addiction is so powerful. Thank you Scott, I'm right there with you and will follow any advice you offer on this topic. There are so many creative projects I want to work on but I'm exhausted by the screens hypnotic force.
me too
When you are doubted for your rock posession, try hurling the rock at the doubter🕊️
Watching the conversation, I think it's clear how the viewpoints diverge. One is arguing from evidence to a conclusion, and the other is arguing from a conclusion and trying to fit the evidence. Why Black seemed to be dishonest is because he would constantly need to change the parameters, gaslighting, and ignoring reality, to fit his conclusions.
he shifted around a lot, demanded to change topics, then switch back, etc etc etc... control freak... not self aware. etc
@@goosemasters there was a lot wrong with how Black argued. Scott wasn't prepared, or capable, of spotting the flaws, or pointing them out in real time. It would have been easy to catch Black in traps each time he shifted his rhetoric, but Scott simply is not skilled enough to handle it.
None of that happened. Watch again.
@@randygault4564 it happened.
@@krops2331 Scott v MIB and Scott was found wanting. Scott, the Right Wing Democrat "We" "Us" he says all the time but then says "well I'm not part of that side". Scott floundered around flipping and flopping when the heat was turned up ... ""The link?" What the?" "Geez where will I find that" "Phew sigh rolls eyes hmmm phew sigh aaaaah aaah," "Why doesn't aaaahh" My damn phone, I can't" "Someone send me a link" "My phone is now broken" " I can't look up on this phone" IT WAS FREAKIN PATHETIC SCOTT!!! Was he stoned??? Then Scott starts swearing at MIB after the Biden words etc. Scott " I gotta go I have a dentist appt" hahhhaaaahaaa.... Scott argued like a Leftard and MIB stayed on point and was rather logical arguing like a RWinger (even though he is obviously a fake news believing Libsht) and was pretty much rock solid. I think he studied Scott's usual grandiose mode and punched right through the holes and flip flop that Scott always leaves for his usual backtracking.... SCOTT DIDN'T LAND A BLOW!! The one conversation, THE ONE that Scott hangs his hat on "The fine people hoax debunked will change the course of history this election, it's the most critical thing to face the world" ... yet Scott could produce No link, NO recording, NO evidence, NO proof WTF???? Scott did scant research into the topics as usual and evidently scant research into how MIB would perform. Scott's of the cuff chilled messy way of performing his usual methods of discernment about spotting fake news were totally inadequate against a guy who clearly has good debate skills. Scott argued like a Leftard shifting positions, changing subjects, not staying on point, loosely using "debunked" as usual, He could not back up his strategies nor any of his points. MIB on the other hand was very straightforward, stayed on subject (except when he elevated to include Trump "they are sending rapists ... " and shifted the goalposts) was prepared, links at hand for evidence, looking up links in a flash. MIB was attentive and competent - Scott was lazy and incompetent. And I hate to say it but Weasely slimeball Libsht MIB won. And Scott take the "L"
MIB was just enforcing herd morality. We aren't seeing different realities, MIB is a very comfortable member of the herd. His morality is following the herd.. Nothing more
Ian takes the least charitable view of people he doesn’t like and the most charitable view of people he does like. This is as common as crap on a horse track.
I could not listen to more than 15 minutes of the Scott - Ian talk. I thought Ian was a total gaslighting creepy bastard.
@@allanmarks2150 Same here
Scott Adams is more right today than ever before
A head on confrontation with a member of the Crazy Left tends to tune up the intellect.
Here’s my prediction: If you ask Ian about things Republicans do wrong, his whole logic would flip and all of a sudden his principals would be the opposite so he could trash them. I do not believe Scott’s principals and logic would flip in that scenario.
0:21 Skip the BUM BUM BUM
1:15 Skip the Sip
Skip your assisting
You're still alive? Worrying about this kind of thing will send you to an early grave.
yeah, i remember darryl saying boogity, boogity, boogity, le's go racing boys every week for years and i grew to hate it almost as much as darryl did. towards the end you could hear in his voice the dripping disgust and loathing that they made him say it.
Trump should pick Vivek to ensure they don’t try to remove him again
I once had a long conversation on the WSJ with a smart democrat, who finally admitted to me that politics and crime are the same thing- and his side will get away with whatever they can get away with- and that's just the way the world works.
I’m getting tired of the talk about simulation.
Recreational belief
MIB displayed a perfect example of "Picking the Pepper out of the Fly Shit".
The Black conversation did not push the needle anywhere. People will double down on stupidity.
Postmodernist believe language creates reality. Thinking people believe language describes reality.
He said he was Hyper-Literal, that is Spectrum Tell.
Makes sense if true. Biden consistently makes the implication that Trump was calling nazis fine people whenever he's asked about it, but in MIB's mind the fact that Biden never specifically said the words "Trump called neo-nazis fine people", but rather "he said there were fine people on both sides, " it somehow absolves Biden from any accusations of deception or dissembling. And if you're autistic, you can just keep saying "he never said Trump called neo nazis fine people" and just keep hanging on that technicality as if you've won something.
Scott cracks me up. We didn’t simply watch two people bickering back-and-forth for 100 minutes. We watched “reality bifurcating in real time.” 😂
I think Scott strategy was to bore the guy to death with laundry list of talents 😂
Black just played word games and frustrated Scott. That's all. The whole dumpster 🔥 was a complete waste of time.
Scott, you are making too many excuses.! You were ill prepared and it's as simple as that. You should have had every link you needed prior to the conversation. You could have played it on your computer and showed it to him and the audience which would have liked to see that. Your fumbling with your iPhone did not help your point of view at all period. The conversation in your phone was garbled and you must have touched something that made it extra fast and it was not clearly Audible in a conclusive way. I really enjoy your podcasts, but this one was a disaster for you in my opinion even though I agree with every point you made and have made in the past. Unfortunately you were not convincing because you did not have everything ready before the conversation took place. Thank you and best wishesc
I agree. He was also not prepared to deal with standard DNC techniques, such as "If you disagree with me on one point, you disagree with me on all points and are therefore a conservative". The "we" thing was particularly painful.
Scott is suffering from the same thing Black is suffering. Scott is convinced that we must be in a simulation that displays different realities instead of the simple answer that people lie and have a pathological need to be correct for whatever underlying reason.
While I love Scott immensely, I have to agree with you on this point. Ian was very prepared with the standard "he didn't say that - exactly" argument and prior preparedness would have made this argument look much more foolish. Biden's exact words did not explicitly say Trump said the White supremacists were the same as fine people, although the implication is clear in the clip Scott played. The main point was the IMPLICATION and it should have been the focus of the argument. Then, he could have hammered nail in the coffin with the second clip of pundits stating the implicit connection between "fine" people" and the White Supremacists. Even if Biden did not say it directly, the media reported it as such, proving Scotts argument that the news is fake. Ian would have had to agree.
@@brianmulligan5956 Scott thought they were having a "conversation", but Michael obviously wasn't.
@@krops2331 Yes, Black was very prepared - even though he feigned ignorance and Scott lost his cool in the middle of the conversation with the F-bombs. He could have just asked Black, point blank, who he thought the fine people were, but he didn't. It didn't even matter what Biden says or said, it's the news reporting equating fine people with Nazis which was the entire point of the conversation and why it's a hoax.
Wanna comment on the rock thing. 16:30 if the person denies that you have a rock on your hand, throw the at guys face, let's see then if he denies how painful it was. LOL
In oo programming, we use pointers to objects, so the memory doesn’t have to be duplicated, just referenced. Saves memory. Simulation would so that.
😮 yeas! It’s sooo addicting. It’s so seductive and nice to us. Real life isn’t, and that’s why we find it so comforting. ❤
If Trump did not say the neo-Nazis, and clan were “very fine people”, then why was it such a moral imperative to get him out of office?
There was no moral imperative.
He was a threat to the corrupt people running the government.
Michael was very defensive.
We are all on the spectrum. The question is "where are you on the spectrum".
I've had an argument like that where each phrase was dissected, and we were going around in circles. I finally said "stop nitpicking every individual word I use and try to understand the content of what I'm saying." She got mad and disengaged.
It seems to be some intersection of hyper-literals, grammar na2is, midwits, and English majors (I was an English major too but a very bad one).
He was more concerned about winning the argument than seeing what was really happening.
18:00 Scott, MIB was looking for the EXACT quote from Biden: "Trump called the Nazis in Charlottesville very fine people". He hung his hat on that EXACT quote, which is why he kept repeating it over and over. The substance of Biden's countless quotes about the subject didn't matter to MIB, because you couldn't find the exact "Trump called the Nazis in Charlottesville very fine people".
But that exists. He's said that many times. Scott was unprepared and when asked to look for videos on his phone, which we all watch videos on, he turned into a grandma trying to put a CD in her VCR. He was unprepared for climate change as well. It was like watching someone miss layups on a fast break
@@merc9nine😂
Yay! 15 minutes! Our nation is safe after all…
an episode where Scott conducts his own self mortem
Trying to show MIB the fine people footage was painful. Scott could have been better prepared, but I don't think anything would have penetrated that cognitive dissonance.
Scott was terrible in that debate. Scott’s not the intellect he thinks he is. His self anointed BS expert is nothing but ego. Dude, you failed the ultimate BS litmus test, you got the shot.
Yes, Scott was unprepared and disorganized. I don't know what MIB was doing, but it was insufferable. A weird experience.
MIB was totally disingenuous or he's really dumb. I don't think he's dumb.
Chat GPT says Biden made multiple reference to Trump saying nazi's were fine people.
I tried to watch the MIB chat and couldn't make it past 15 minutes. Still valuable footage to have on the internet though.
i watched it... its painful...
"liberals" will often play semantical games in order to steer conversations into another lane, it's a tactic to avoid dealing with an idea that may be too esoteric. There's some element of hairsplitting that can make a conversation tedious.
I dropped out yesterday after 10 minutes. It was a train wreck that far in.
ditto
Another way to conserve resources is to have your non-player characters running simplified algorithms. For example an algorithm that can't process the fine people hoax doesn't even try.
You're showing us all how it's done Scott
I have 2 boys with autism and he did act like someone on the spectrum so don’t feel bad Scott.
It wasn't a debate? I find this surprising, as the exchange had opening & closing statements with a bunch of back & forth sandwiched in the middle. That's a typical debate format.
FWIW, I thought MIB lost.
I think most people don't give 2 hoots about climate change I sure don't
Simulation Theory: would it not use less hard drive space, if we all had the same memory, rather than 9 billion competing realities?
"had there even been a war between two countries that had a really strong trading situation"
The war of independence between USA and UK
The civil war between USA and CSA.
The people with cognitive dissonance are the ones telling you that everything is fine while the house burns down around them. The only reason this is a discussion is because the media has gotten involved and some people are conditioned to never question the media...especially those who are embedded in it. If Michael said anything about the media he wouldn't get his shows and other shit promoted. He needs the access.
"...On-the-spectrum..." -- All the cool cats call it being "neurodivergent." 😎
VP pick should be a black man. Republicans should not take a stand against this on the grounds that it "looks" DEI. That is the wrong interpretation. Rather, a guy like Byron Donald should be picked in spite of DEI, and then be allowed to show that in his performance on the job. I also think that the Trump should give the VP way more responsibility.
I think he was afraid of any type of agreement with you for fear of being associated with your cancellation. So he tried to tie up the fight like a boxer who grabs his opponent thus making a real fight impossible but still wasting time. I had to turn it off after about five minutes because it was so awkward watching that strange guest.
Who?
The guest Michael what’s-his-face.
.
I thought MIB was being punctilious and obsessively literal, but played by rules that keep debates honest - i.e. every assertion must be proven, including its background assumptions, or you can't more forward. It's annoying as hell. But it's part of the job of wrangling the truth - which I don't think got resolved in the debate, because it wandered around off-topic too much. Still - an interesting exercise.
Talking about your credentials for half hour is not a debate.. Didn’t even have examples ready. Just expected him to believe you because of your “expertise”.
They never said it would be a debate. It was meant to be a discussion about how and whether one can decide what news is real or fake. Scott started by talking about the experience he had in having to detect BS.
I sorta agree... really expected Scott to just spout his usual metrics for deciding what news is fake and how he determines what seems real. They could have taken it from there...
I feel like he explained it better before on the regular podcast
"On the spectrum" is a phrase used to describe Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD), a neurodevelopmental condition that affects social communication and brain development.
Thank you for that, Detective
Michael Ian Black outsourced everything he knew to some other authority.
Dopamine depletion syndrome caused by screen stimulation that exhausts the Dopamine receptors. A common thing in the modern screen world..the recommended remedy is to take away time from electronic screens and pursue an adrenalin rush like an e bike ride down Malibu way at night with no lights...
It was a bad faith conversation. He was hyped up on ritalin, caffeine etc to give him a speed advantage. His endless facial tics, head quirks, blinking, twitching, fidgeting and rapidity of speech reveals it to anyone knowledgeable about stimulants, especially the effects of pharmaceutical grade products. Secondly, he hyper-parsed every syllable you said in order to throw you off in some meaningless gotcha way. Do this enough times and your opponent gets worn down and loses his train of thought and continuity. Which is the point of him doing it. Not to honestly engage in meaningful discussion. Pretending not to know what you mean. Disrupt every single thought and sentence that comes out of your mouth with a contradiction, qualifier or question. Change the subject and launch red herrings as soon as you hit on something irrefutable {as he did when you showed the 2nd video}.
But really, all of these are instinctive techniques used by jouish people they are born with and culturally reinforced as they grow to adulthood. It's formally called a Talmudic dialectic. A Clintonian parsing and breakdown of words and language in order to reassemble them in a way that accomplishs whatever you want. You can see it in verses within the Talmud where prominent historical rabbis "outsmart god" by developing a construct that beats god's rules and edicts in a way that doesn't technically violate the letter of his law. This is why observant jouhs have these strange practices on the sabbath to avoid breaking their religious commandments {Shabbat Laws}. They can effectively break them by using Talmudic workarounds based on upon convoluted technicalities that allow them to not adhere to them as long as the workaround is used {historically through the use of Shabbos Goys in many cases}.
So, Scott is literally living in a parallel universe of naivete not understanding what he's dealing with. I'm quite sure MIB knew who he was dealing with, as all jouhs are hyper-aware of who's jouish and "in on the game" and who isn't.
I expected the guest to narrow in on a microscopic definition of success where in his mind the argument was whether someone had literally attributed the exact quote "nazis are very fine people" which is of course not the exact quote. I didn't expect Scott to be unwilling to believe that the guest was doing this. Yes the guest was willfully blinding himself to the Scott's real position, but Scott also refused to interpret the guest In the literal terms that he was insisting on using, creating deadlock.
Being in a stoned simulation didn’t work for Scott.
I like windows not screens, but I get Scott’s drift on screen sickness. CZcams shorts about puppies and other animals, especially when they are being saved, are addicting, but a good one.
thanjs scott
He was absolutely awful. Your very rude guest, that is.
Trending on social media in the United States of Stupid " what's this free lasagne thing?"
If it’s so urgent pick up the phone and call instead of texting
I think he was playing semantics. He was saying that they didn't literally quote him as saying that they merely implied that Trump said that Nazis were fine people, but the only part with quotes was "fine people on both sides." He literally said "fine people on both sides." the issue up for debate was who he said that about. Was it people who were against the statue being removed or the neo-Nazis? He was saying that the News wanted to lead their listening to understand he said it about the Nazis, but technically they weren't lying because they only put quotes around the part he did say. And when you showed him clips of news people and politicians saying just that, he claimed that the politicians don't count, we're only talking about the media. And then he's making every excuse why your clear evidence doesn't count.
And then in that discussion about the immigrants being murdurers and rapists, you should have turned his literalness against him. Trump didn't say all the immigrants were murdurers and rapists. He said they are sending murdurers and rapists. Have they sent at least 2 murdurers and at least 2 rapists? Yes, that's undeniable. So then how can you call the statement inaccurate. And if he says it's accurate, but is racist, how can an accurate statement be racist? And then he might say it's about the vibe of it not what he's literally saying, which your argument about the fine people hoax.
Who?
@@garyfrancis6193 What's his name. Black. The comedian guy.
24:45 Doctors too. My wife and I argue about this often, she thinks they are a live it, that they accept money but are unaffected due to their desire to help others suppresses the normal human greed response. I apply the follow the money principle in all cases. Exhibit A is the hot sales reps for me.
Screen sickness and AI say goodbye
The power of discrimination
Mr Black was annoying i turned him off
Everyone is on the spectrum. It's a spectrum.
The two countries that had similar relationship to China and America was the relationship between Britain and Germany before the first world war..Neil Ferguson did a video on it" The Colour of Money ".
The Asent of Money Niall Ferguson
Shoulda known you were in for a treat when beta boy started with a monster swig of his posey infused soy tea latte
I'd say your friend was lying and making excuses. For example, it seemed deceptive when he said- "That's not news. It was a topic on the news." He's drawing a distinction without a difference to avoid being wrong. Later he said that he "won the debate" when there was no debate. It looks to me like he does not value truth or integrity. All he cares about is his side winning. I'd agree with your "2 movies" to some extent, but it doesn't explain everything. You seem to be assuming that he was always honest.
Leftists believe winning a conversation means speaking to others like they are stupid and keeping a condescending tone.
I was confused and annoyed for most of the MIB discussion, until I applied the following filter: how would MIB respond if his primary concern is never being wrong about anything?
Men inBlack?
I watch my text messages ones a day or two days, get crazy being with someone watching their phone every minute.
Scott the Avg person runs into dozens of MIB on a daily basis. They are everywhere. It’s like the “there are no American tanks in Baghdad”, guy. Plus MIB came to debate.
That took me like five seconds. Scott needs to up his game.
“He did not,” Biden said. “Let’s get this straight. He said there were very fine people in both groups. They were chanting anti-Semitic slogans, carrying flags.”
Going down the rabbit whole with a democrat. I used to all the time.
They agree on the facts. They don't care about the facts. I've pointed out the facts explicitly to them and they say, "That's not what's important." something like that.
Clear as day. they agreed with the facts. They care about the emotional entanglement of the topic.
"He scares me" "he's mean" "he's rude" That's the emotional context of the conversation.
Once I saw that. I stopped talking to my friend that is a democrat.
I thought he was dumb. And he is dumb. He doesn't understand the impact of raising the min wage. Which I explained to him and he still disagreed. He asked me about obamacare and I explained how it raised the cost of medical across the board. But these made me think he was just dumb.
Nope the legal argument of cohen claiming Trump pressured him to lie. I highlighted exactly the line Cohen said. Cohen "Felt" the pressure to do what He thought he should do. Which was lie. trump didn't tell him to do anything.
I showed that to my friend and he said that it didn't matter. What mattered was that cohen felt pressured. And I'm like. It doesn't matter what facts I present. He's based in emotional reality. not factual.
I'd say it's a bit more than that. They have been tipped into a mark's cyst / Meow-ist goal of some vague thing like liberation--arguments, facts, all that doesn't matter because the goal is what's most important. You only use facts when needed, logic when persuasive, and reality when it's embarrassing to the other side. But none of it--not being kind, not being non- or ant-racist, not being fair, not being considerate to trans people--absolutely none of it actually matters. They are just stepping stones toward the goal. So in many cases they are perfectly rational; they have just set rationality aside until they reach their goal, after which they can go back to being rational, because after all, everything will be perfect then.
Oh, secondarily to that. the lady that cleans my house is a democrat, We talk politics and rationally she agreed that Trump would be better. But when she went to vote in 2020, She said she wanted to vote Trump but her emotions took over and caused her to vote biden.
@@friendlyfire7861 That's just saying the same thing.
Karl Marx was deeply emotional and upset about how badly he was treated. He wanted respect and didn't know how to get it. So he started blaming others based on his emotional opinions.
Moa on the other hand, learned how to control people through emotions. So did hitler. Emotional manipulation. generically "I'm going to give you all that you want and take from those bad people that have all the stuff."
Technically it's the same as Marx but Marx was throwing a tantrum while the other 2 where leveraging it to control people
@@jeffmofo5013 🤯
@@jeffmofo5013 I don't even see my reply anymore, but let me clarify that I don't deny that emotion has a huge influence on their thinking, if you can call it that. What I mean to say is that it is baked into their ideology that arguments and issues are just a means to an end anyway; they are used as long as they are useful and then abandoned. So why bother committing to them? In the long run, a rational argument doesn't matter to them. Otherwise: I make a distinction between Marxism and Maoism because of the more total nature of Maoism; it's far more aggressive. I Marxism, there is at least the theory that everybody can be brought down to the same level, whereas with Maoism there is a definite concept of destroying the "black" class and anyone else who stands in the way, until there are only the "red" people left.
He “identifies” as a comedian. I will have to look for some of his comedy routine videos. From the conversation, I did not detect a sense of humor on his part.
Does anyone else tune out when he starts going on and on and on about AI and/or “robots”? 😝 That talk has gotten so boring. Just like AI has.
Burgum is a RINO, so he's not acceptable. Trump has made a LOT mistakes his 1st term, Mikey being the biggest one.
I'll pass on Trump if he does that
Regarding the size of the U.S. national debt, a key point of information: A Root Cause of the problem this country is facing is the fact that the U.S. government has adopted balanced budgets in Only 5 of the past 50! years.
So the U.S. debt is so big due to deficit spending that there’s no way to “grow” the economy enough to get the deficit back down to a manageable level.
This is a huge problem that most people know nothing about.
The joke is the US arsenal of cruise missiles is basically a single salvo. So yes the capacity for war is overstated.
Scott mentions the locked room in Fulton Co GA but never gives a source. Anyone know one?
Scott, it would take far leas processing power to give everyone the exact same memories rather than give them all slightly different memories. He was also correct about the Big Bang and that even in a simulation, it could have started with the Big Bang. The most logical reason for us to be in a simulation would be to study the universe and the fundamental forces of nature. We would simply be a by product
Constructing approximate memories on the fly is going to require much less memory than even pointers to the same detailed memory. The approximation can be forgotten and regenerated, taking zero space long term.
I actually had the same thing about bringing up autism. It is strange even in a positive light i was talking about a good friend who is autistic.
The appropriate time to wait is when you have time. The world revolves around nobody.
I frequently get asked if I am “on the spectrum”. I take it as a compliment.
Why do you take it as a compliment?
@@jacewatson9401 because it tells me that I have separated myself from the majority population: the people with nothing beyond mindless consumption and following whatever trend they are told to by the advertisers they watch.
Scott, you should try gardening.
Prediction: What are the chances Biden’s team was pre-briefed about each topic, question, in sequence. Biden will recite from pre-fab cue cards.
scott always urged his subs to look for alternate reason...
why is the debate rigged?
is it because Biden is even more feeble than we realize.
i've seen folks in nursing home who could walk from place to place but when it came down to participating in physical activities, they would sit it out as they could not engage in any physically strenuous activity. Thus limit everything to give Biden the edge with great optics.
the alternative is Trump scoring accurate shots after shots with a crowd laughing or applauding his points
while a feeble looking gaped mouth Biden looks glaringly on with pure evil intentions...folks Biden will have to be
juiced up for this debate more than he was for the State of the Union. It feels that way from here.
how will we know...easy...one minute he will whisper the
next hollering at the kids to get off the lawn...spaced out made up stories and outright lies...folks this is gonna be
the worse debate in America history and you are alive to witness it. Poor Scott will have to be careful what he say or else get demonetized by YT the official democrat
censor bureau
CNN will not be giving Biden the questions in advance, Biden will provide CNN with the questions he's been practicing all week.
Help i'm stuck in the middle
Yes, "🎵clowns to the left of you, and jokers to your right"...** 🎶 can be quite traumatic.... But don't BITCH about them until you find assholes in FRONT of you, and DEMONS behind you (or vice versa)... Then I will be in the middle with you? 🤣🤣🤣😶😉
** Song by recording artists Stealers Wheel in case you don't understand the reference.
Scott sounds different today.
That was a weird walk off. Why’s there always got to be something? …
Personally, I felt Scott was challenged in his “streaming of thoughts” that he talks all by himself everyday.
He didn’t know how to present his argument/ideas to someone has never heard their ideas.
And Scott was definitely unprepared, why doesn’t he have these “proofs” already saved in a file.
MIB was really good at defining the terms, and trying to stick to the topics.
And Scott kept appealing to his own “greatness” in thinking as the authority.
And this is why Scott could not get anywhere. Because at the very least they should have agreed on all topics but disagreed on the implications.
Why did Scott not show him that the news not refuting the “fine people” and they refute those who say it’s a hoax?
Why didn’t he show the most news is owned by a few people and those same people donate to journalist schools, and that many say they are unbiased, but they use biased words? That they don’t actually do journalism, they repeat DNC, and government talking points.
Yep. Scott seems to be very isolated and debating is a whole other ballgame than just talking to an audience.
When you have to explain every thought how can you have a streaming of thoughts? Think a bit next time before you write.
🤡
Re: resources, you would only need to store one "copy" of a given resource and then everyone would just have pointers to it. Common computing concept.
Rivian up 40% today. I think Scott said yesterday that he bought Rivian. VW invested $1B.
It was interesting how committed MIB was to the Big Bang theory.
Well he was right about that
51:00 What is logical for puzzles is not the same as colloquial logic or logistics. This is conflating two different definitions for logical.
A man will text if no response but will send a message about a new thing - but the aim is to see if there’s a response….. so text 1 might be “so we still on for coffee at 2 today?”
After an hour of no response he might send “Oh did you catch that game last night ?”
It doesn't seem to help when you try to talk about racism or Trump with people who don't agree with you. Move on.