Why Everyone is Wrong About the SIG MCX Regulator
Vložit
- čas přidán 16. 06. 2024
- The internet is wrong about the SIG MCX Regulator! @JamesReeves challenges the status quo and dives deep into the heart of the controversy surrounding the SIG MCX Regulator. Amidst internet backlash, we take a closer look to unveil the truth, debunk common myths, and highlight the undeniable merits of this revolutionary rifle.
- Breaking Down the MCX Legacy: Understand the origins of the SIG MCX platform and how the Regulator evolves this legacy for modern needs.
- Unpacking Features & Innovations: Explore the cutting-edge design, from its adaptable gas system for suppressor use to quick caliber swaps, that sets the Regulator apart.
- Aesthetics vs. Functionality: Addressing the aesthetic criticisms head-on, we assess the practical performance and unique features that make the Regulator a standout.
- Comparative Insight: How does the Regulator fare against popular alternatives like the Mini-14? A detailed comparison sheds light on this debate.
Your Voice Matters:
💬 Have opinions on the SIG MCX Regulator? Share your thoughts in the comments and let's spark a constructive discussion!
👍 If our perspective has provided you with new insights, please like this video and subscribe for more thought-provoking content.
⇒ SUPPORT US AND WIN FREE GEAR EVERY MONTH ⇐
TFBTV is viewer supported. We need you. We give away $1,900 in gift certificates to Top Gun Supply and Blue Alpha EVERY SINGLE MONTH to our supporters. You are automatically entered to win as a supporter of TFBTV. How to enter/full official rules are found at tfbtv.gun.team
CZcams is not a sponsor of this contest.
««« APPAREL IN THIS VIDEO »»»
• Apparel: All TFBTV apparel is sponsored by 5.11 Tactical and you can get it at www.511tactical.com
««« FOLLOW US ON SOCIAL MEDIA »»»
/ tfbtv
/ thefirearmblog
/ thefirearmblogtv
/ tfbtv
««« TFB CHAT ROOM »»»
Want to join the TFBTV chat room? Use our Discord Invite: discord.gg/tfbtv
#TFBTV
Navigate Through the Video:
0:00 - Introduction
0:56 - The MCX Legacy & Regulator's Birth
2:50 - Key Features
7:45 - Accuracy Testing
9:17 - James' Opinion
11:47 - MCX Regulator vs. Ruger Mini-14
13:25 Conclusion
#SIGMCXRegulator #GunReviews #FirearmsControversy #TacticalShooting #MilitaryGear #RifleReview #GunRights #ShootingSports - Sport
I stand by the meme, the Regulator is the ugliest gun of 2024.
Also I hate "modernized" lever guns, so at least it's ideologically consistent.
Only way I understand the lever guns is that certain calibers natively beat Lv3 body armor. I’ve no actual experience in this regard. But I can’t imagine those plates do well against green tips either so 🤷🏼♂️
Naw fam, the POF Tombstone still takes the cake
"modernized" lever guns? More like the devolution of MCX for more $$$.
I agree on both points. The concept is fine, but the execution and price is not.
@@lukepoplawski3230 speed defeats body armor, and a 45-70 doesn’t have much, also the blunt nose of the bullets that are required when stacking them in a tube doesn’t help either
I just hate the price
Yeaaaahh I get it. I think Sig would sell a buttload of complete lowers if they would package them separately though.
I can't even afford name-brand potato chips anymore, so PSA it is
@tfbtv as a former sig employee I have tons of people that still work there telling me qc on these is a nightmare which doesn't really make much sense but hey that's sig for ya. That cerakote will probably rub off in a month's time
I live in Ct. I got a Fightlite lower with a bcm upper for half the price
Well sig hates you
If you see someone with this at the range, be sure to ask them if it's a Kel-Tec SU-16
LMAO. Will do.
Love the chaotic energy!
"You had it custom cerakoted and ditched the folding stock huh?"
The regulator is easier to find than the SU-16.
jokes on you su 16s are way more rare
>3000 price tag in ban states
"why aren't we selling many of these? people must not want a rifle like this"
The FM-15 Ranch Rifle is a fraction of the cost
Also has a threaded barrel which means its probably a no-go in most ban states anyways.
Paddle mag release, side charging handle and a grand shaved off the price and I’m there
That would be the Foxtrot Mike version that came out last year.
Yeah. I could get behind that
@@mrrustygrayI looked that up, doesn’t have the paddle mag release or a side charging handle so not really
@@chancehunter1947 FM mostly does side chargers, look a little harder.
That's just a mini-14
Perfect rifle to mount up on a mission to find Warren G.
Also very silly to not offer a non threaded barrel version for stricter ban states
With sixteen in the clip & one in the hole?
Gotta be handy with the steel earn your keep!
It was a clear black night, a clear white moon …
Gun was made for CA. muzzle brakes are legal.
Yeah would the non threaded variant that’s coming down the line be legal In Illinois anybody know?
I'm glad you snuck in the Regulators joke at the end 😂. It needed to be done.
Mount up, James, mount up.
$3 grand for a ranch rifle. Guess that’s the results of a booming economy lol.
Nah that's just the sig markup
@@TheBoss10725why not both?
Sig's quality nosedives and their prices skyrocket as soon as they get involved heavily with the government. Shocking.
I'm betting the retail price will be more around $2400-$2500.
Yeah, I don't know what's wrong with these clowns they think that everybody's doing great, not😅
If only Mini 14 with AR mag, will definitely win over Regulator
Man that would be so great
But nothing in this world is perfect
One comment came to my mind that one plant manager said during a technical meeting, "I really appreciate your work and effort into this, but I don't like it."
Oof! That price. Hopefully this will inspire Ruger to make a “modernized” mini 14 ranch rifle.
They really don't need to do much.
Tell Magpul to make a Hunter stock for it, sell it with that. Slap a pic rail and maybe even an RMR cut on top. Modify it to take AR mags. Keep price 800-1000 bucks.
Done.
Be really nice if Ruger modernized the Mini 14 to use a non-proprietary magazine.
@@jeffreybrooks8643 Why on Earth would they rid themselves of the most reliable source of post-ISP revenue? Do you know how Lee Iacocca saved Chrysler? He made it so things like transmission fluid were proprietary to Chrysler vehicles, so you'd need to either get your car serviced in their dealerships, or buy your fluids and other goods from their Mopar shops. Letting customers get their supplies and service from anyone was just letting money walk out the door, so he closed the door and had their bailout paid off in two years. Ruger knows what they're doing to run their business successfully, and part of that is not letting money walk out the door by ditching a superior magazine so you can use whatever crud you want. Mini-14 mags are expensive, but they're also something you buy for life and can abuse to hell without breaking it. You don't like AR mags because they're good, you like AR mags because they're cheap. If you look at steel (not aluminum, steel) AR mags, they're priced in the same ballpark as Mini-14 mags. On top of that, when you buy them, that money is going to Ruger, not some third party. It's been getting on my nerves over the past few years that people who have no idea how to actually run a profitable business go on every gun space and yell the same tired sound byte that if Ruger made the Mini-14 take AR mags, they'd sell more. That would be enticing if every one that gets produced wasn't already getting sold as soon as it hits the shelf somewhere. Every one of those is causing sales of additional magazines. Why would they kill the goose that's actively laying golden eggs?
Yes! Ruger needs to make a compatible stock for other mags.
@@jeffreybrooks8643 Not really possible to make it use AR mags without changing the whole mag lock design. They could probably make it use HK33, Galil, or AK-101 mags but I think those are even more rare
11:31 - James, the main issue is the marketing with cowboys, and ranch hands....offering a $3000 dollar rifle when the competition is offering sub $1000 rifles.
Whats a good option ?
I’m a farmer. And a gun enthusiast and a big sig fan. But why market a rifle that cost 3k to hard working guys who could go buy a Henry lever gun for $900 or a Ruger ranch hand for even cheaper. There’s no reason for this gun at all. It’s ridiculous
They just took an MCX and put a Mossberg stock on it and think ranchers and farmers will buy it. Sig is very dumb. Why would a farmer buy this instead of a BCM or DD AR15. Or just a regular MCX, I’m waiting.
This keeps coming up, and it makes me laugh. Of COURSE it's not legitimately being marketed to actual ranchers. It is a softened image for marketing in non-free states to avoid drawing unwanted scrutiny.
First tip for cool firearms: Don't be poor.
Side note: Fightlite needs to step up their "SCR" production and lower their price. They could outsell the Sig with clever marketing.
Exactly but they’ve gotten comfortable with their absurdly priced niche rifles
First tip for life: Don't be a sucker.
This is for suckers.
Second tip, don't be a sucker. The Fonz was cool according to a lot of people too. Even though he lived over someone's garage, had two changes of clothes and banged highschoolers.
@@bubbalawrence1 and as long as people keep buying them, Sig will keep making them and selling them at absurd prices.
Price is already 1/3 the sig on the fightlite.
Someone forgot to remind SIG that guns in anti gun states get extra expensive due to permits, ammo background checks, etc. so making a rather pricey rifle designed to accommodate anti gun states is a bigger downside than you think.
very true
Also, it isn’t even a viable option in all the ban states because it’s threaded with a muzzle device!
@@jsirius94I was gonna say idk/think about it would be legal in Illinois. Not even sure if a non threaded version would be legal because it has a full handguard
-Illinois law is extremely confusing with that-
Californians will buy this without a second thought.
They spend $2M on a 2000 sq ft house with no yard. Drive a Tesla and Porsche, and own a Volvo SUV "just in case."
And threaded barrels are legal on rifles in CA.
@@jsirius94 In california surprisingly, as long as that muzzle device is a muzzle break you're good to go.
Foxtrot Ranch Lower with a BRN180 upper is the correct anwser.
SCR lower with ARAK21 or maybe a jakl upper don't know it that would fit
I had no idea that lower existed. I think these sort of guns done with unique furniture would look really good in a movie or something.
FlightLite SCR is the correct answer been around way longer than Foxtrot. Foxtrot copied their homework.
Faxon never has the ARAK21 systems in stock.
@@user-hk5fs8re6z true I have 2 but when I ordered the 2nd it was over a year to get it
SIG Europe: "I have no son..."
Technicly they are still owned by L&O holding which sits in germany. So yeah. Still a german company xD
Yet good luck getting a p365
which one, the german gun manufacturer that shut down 4 years ago? or the swiss industrial conglomerate that makes my milk packaging?
@@coolbean9880 look what the L&O holding owns... Blaser, Mauser, Sauer&Sohn, Sig Usa, Sig germany, gsg and a couple more manufacturers.
@@uwesca6263 and h&k is owned by a luxembourgish holding company called CDE, does that make it luxembourgish?
For anti-free states, it's good. However, the price. Geez.
It helps that people in most anti-gun states make more money on average. I have to assume this is the reason for the outrageous price. Someone in CA, CT, MA, NY, etc given the options (Mini-14, Fightlite SCR) might shell out the $3K. Not me...
the price is an anti-free measure
Still won't be legal in Massachusetts it's patterned after the AR-15 therefore illegal unless they made it in 22lr
I feel like all the taxes and cost of living make that higher pay mean less though, no?
@@DevinAldenJesus, what can you actually own in Mass these days? A nerf gun?
As someone who used to live in a restrictive state (California), the folks who now have access to a MCX could care less about the aesthetics. Especially compared to the featureless monstrosities in their safe already.
Or they could get a Mini-14 and not worry about any of this. I will never understand the aversion some people have to such a fine rifle.
@@kevinbenedict1422 It's the tacticool hardos that've never fired one and just keep regurgitating what other 19 year olds on the internet say. And they clearly get butthurt about not being able to mount 37 accessories to the forend of it.
That's why the old statement about them being inaccurate just won't die, even though Ruger changed the barrel profile well over 15 years ago. And the only reason the old ones got the bad rep is because nobody knows how to properly handle a pencil profile barrel and has unrealistic expectations on what useful real-world accuracy is for something like that.
Everyone, and I'm not exaggerating, that has handled my Mini loves it. It's a blast to fire. I added a barrel stabilizer and a Hannibal rail with an RMR cut (these also come with slots to mount a light/laser if you want one) and run a pistol reflex on it.
Yup, if the internet wants to know what ugly looks like they need to look at what AR-15 rifles look like in California and other heavily restrictive states.
@@kevinbenedict1422 as someone who grew up in california and was around before there was work arounds to obtaining regular AR's/AK's the reason I don't like the Mini-14 is because I hate the california government and the Mini-14 shouldn't be my only option. That's why I still have no desire for Mini-14's. Call me stupid, it's just a desire to want to own the "real thing" and not just what is allowed. Great rifle, nothing against it, just not for me.
@@kevinbenedict1422 Proprietary magazines. I'm in a banned state but have preban mags.
I don't think it looks ugly... But for 3500, I think there are much better options even in ban states. Living in a gun-friendly state 3500 could get something better and as reliable, plus an optic, plus a suppressor, plus a weapon light and still have money for some ammo
I like this trend, your video on mini-14 home defenders getting less prison time than AR-15 home defenders has made me want an SCR or just an AR with a traditional rifle stock. It would be nice to see some new options for traditional stock ARs.
Fightlite SCR is cheaper, BRN-180 even less, and the FM-15 is cheaper still. I think the Sig is cool, just too damn expensive when good alternatives exists for way less.
James, don't forget about the SU16. It would be cool if you got one of those and maybe see what you could do to upgrade it. See how far you could push it and how it performs.
3000 should get you a much better rifle. Still a decent gun
Who said this was decent? Seems like it met all the expectations of a great ranch rifle. Wouldn't get one myself living in TX but I can see the appeal especially for those in states where regular ars are illegal
@@Shake688in most states where a regular AR is illegal, threaded barrels on semi auto, center fire rifles are also illegal. So it fails to get around restrictions at all.
The zoolander in the coal mine line had me dieing
Love the Firefly reference, and as always, an informative, humorous review.
Saiga did the same concept with their AK years ago, the Sporter.
A trigger so bad my finger refused to pull it.
Thank you for correctly using the singular form of criteria; criterion.
Isn’t this like a more expensive version of the Fightlite SCR?
I love the no pistol grip stock look, very cool gun James :)
You know your gun sucks when the mini 14 makes more sense than it
A less accurate, less reliable rifle makes more sense than an mcx??
My first thought when I saw this gun was of my Mini 14. I love that rifle, but most do not. So I’m happy to have another non-AR 223 semiauto. And I trust Sig to do it right.
@@JTheraosSorry Charlie unless you're using s*** aftermarket magazines the Ruger mini-14 is no way less reliable
MCX’s are garbo. People are having handguards wiggle off our of the box. Cope harder its literally an ar18 in a flashy skin suit
@@JTheraosfor 1/4 the price, kinda yeh
Yeah, I agree that Sig should make it more like an AK, they already started with the safety, so they may as well continue with the mag release and charging handle.
I own the OG gen 1 SCR and the 14 lb trigger and it has as much resistance as pulling a brick through colonoscopy. I swear it feels like a 30lb trigger
This gave me a good snort
i actually like this gun too. though they werent exactly first with this design. Fightlite came out with an AR lower that looks like this.
Me: Hey this is a cool alternative to the Mini-14
Me: Checks MCX Regulator price
Me: Hello Mini-14♥
Cowboy Bebop.
I'll give Sig credit for trying to get into the ban state market. They recently got a variant of the p365 on the California safe handgun roster and they license they p320 FCU to Franklin Armory to put in single shot frames
Bleeped by the Serenity. Bravo sir, bravo.
😂 fantastic opening/unboxing commentary.
I'd rather take the Regulator or the SCR because they can take some AR parts over the Mini 14. Even with the grip position switched, I still perfer the AR controls.
The Netflix AR
lmao
Been waiting for your review!!!
This plus an 80% lower and mcx buffer conversion tucked away, a good way to go
I can't wait for Hop to do his response video!
It's a ranch rifle, not a close-quarter combat gun. The position of the mag release is WAY down on the list of priorities in such a gun used for hunting/plinking. BUT.... the price of such a gun should be way high on the list of desirable features, which this, of course, fails at its current msrp of THREE THOUSAND DOLLARS.
I love it, and would totally get one, but that price tag....ouch. The Spear LT is less expensive.
This gun looks DOPE!!! I'm in the camp with you!
Not bad for banned states that don't have many choices, but the price point is discouraging. Also some cites/states you can't have a threaded barrel, or any sort of break or flash hider.
What bothers me is, how often the springs on these Sigs turn into wet spaghetti.
I’ve never heard of this but I like it
Hello James, I am always a fan of your work, keep em coming. Living in NY, the laws are so restricted that this Sig makes a it a viable option plus the .308 chambering would be great for a hunting option,A dual purpose rifIe. I wish ruger would get with the program with their mini series using ar15 and ak47 pattern mags as they use clock mags in or the ability to in the PC Carbine and the response rifles. The mags are the weak link. To buy factory mags only and stock up, doesn't make sense to me in 2024 where mag compatibility is a thing.
gotta respect their achievement in making the mini-14 more relevant in 2024
James' sense of humor compels me to watch his videos. Sig's rising profile and performance in the industry lately compeled me to watch this one. But this video reinforced my fondness (fetish) of Ruger's Mini (.223/5.56, 300BO & 7.62x39).
Mount up! I think it was a clear black night, clear white moon, James Reeves on the street tryin to consume....Keep it up James!
It's a vibe
-Admin
Reminds me of an M14!
Next level references in this one James.
Great review
Mini 14, m1 carbine, m1 garand, Ruger pc carbine, SKS, saiga hunter stock AK.
All universally seen positively.
Mcx-R ? Apparently the worst thing to ever exist.
It’s worst when it comes to pricing. Still haven’t heard arguments for why it’s worth the $3K+ price tag compared to the alternatives you’ve already listed. Heck, a Springfield M1A looks downright affordable compared to the Regulator.
It's almost legal in my state 😢😢 fuckin Washington. Can't wait to move.
Coming to Missouri? Could use a roommate whos about guns. Lol
I remember my Sgt Major used to brag about his crazy arsenal in Washington and made fun of California
Perfect take. I love it
Love it! Waiting for the Regulator Spear version in 308 with a side charger and I will buy it regardless of cost.
I don't think that people hate the rifle. Sig is just insane with the MSRP on this rifle. How can the Spear LT be cheaper? It just seems that Sig is trying to recoup their costs on the Government contract by raping the civilian market. There are better options out there at a much affordable price.
Or recover costs of designing and testing a completely new lower…
You're thinking wrong, I hate this rifle.
@@calhitmen why?
@@Pb.Slinger not worth the money.
@@calhitmen yeah you’re not wrong. MSRP on this is crazy.
It’s cool, but I’d just buy a PSA Jackal
PSA are kinda dicks and wont ship to a lot of ban states (like mine) so the Regulator and FM-15 Ranch Rifle are about the only decent options we folk get.
Thank you for letting us know
Enshallah
@@nostravoluntasunitasthey don't ship to banned states cause they are banned...
Good review.... I like the way the rifle looks. Plus it's a Sig!!!! Pricey but I want one.
Well you could get the fightlite SCR lower and then put on a side charge handle AR upper or any other standard AR upper and fix the handling issues. Cool gun nice looks.
It sucks can’t take steel.
Just in time for that 11% tax here in California
What in the NCR is that?
Great video. I like the looks of the gun. But an 8 pound AR alternative with rekt ergos for 3 grand? NEEEWP!!!
The Warren G regulate joke was priceless!!!😂😂😂😂
I call her Vera.
"That's why I never kiss them on the lips."
The real question is: Would you trade her for Saffron?
You kissed her too!
I'll be in my bunk
Why not use mini 14? Cheaper and same concept
If you want a side charging upper on a very similar lower you could go a Gibbz arms side charging upper with a fight lit lower. The fightlite lowers are just kind of hard to come by at this point.
James, I’m with you, I think these are really cool. Very similar to the Fightlite SCR, which I also like. But you’re right it does need a side charger. Hell even the MCX needs a side charger. Also, where can I get a James Reeves PMAG!?
Oh look another super leet tactical mainstream firearm company copying off of Keltec. Nothing to see here.
That’s so true!!
Except this one doesn't jam more than Smuckers.
@@mmclaurin8035 well considering the Keltec SU-16 was probably designed in 2002 and costs like $400..I sure hope the regulator works better
3k is absurd for a cope rifle
Sounds like poor coping
@@mattg9971the only ones that anime hermit weaboo knows is from call of duty.. not joking, his videos are even there
It's literally just an mcx with a different stock... you aren't losing basically anything you'd get on a normal mcx. Can you not just be happy that banned states can have an mcx?
@@JTheraos The stock is a big part of the original design, if they change it then the ergos change. Now you have awkward reloads and looser cheek weld. It doesn't do anything the SCR doesn't do and is heavier and loses compatibility for the vast range of AR uppers. Moreover the Regulator isn't even designed for all ban states, it's marketed for the Californians because of the muzzle brake. Shooters in NY (and probably others) still can't use it from the factory without having to pin and weld a thread protector. I'm happy that it exists, maybe just so that other competition will pop up for ban states.
@@mattg9971 t. SIGGER shill
Rick & Morty ref drop! Hell yeah! Definitely would love to have this as my next rifle! Stay Schwifty!
Stop FUDDing the products.
James, I like you dude but SIG just sucks
Im sure you made his day by letting him know that you like him 😂
He did make my day and now you've ruined it stupid mattg9971
Well us use it sooooo
@@tfbtv 😂😂😂
Love it. Hopefully they will release the lower separately for like 750
I would like one with a lever action style charching handle.
Where can we get the James Reeves magazine ?
Nice warren G reference at the beginning
I really like it, I just wish it came with a longer handguard aesthetically.
i like the usual AR15 platform just like anyone, but that stock style on the MCX just looks awesome. if i had the money, i'd be getting one today. if that stock kit was available for standard AR platform, i'd be getting them too.
It’s a vibe. Don’t need it but definitely want one.
The price point is a bit higher than I can afford. The platform itself is fantastic. Fight Lite has been making this version for years. They sell the serialized lower, and you can choose from different uppers or use compatible AR uppers. The price is climbing on them too.
I'd like to see a comparison review on the Foxtrot Mike Ranch Rifle with the Regulator.
Plan to pick one up after Sig finishes beta testing it on the market. 🤷🏼♂️
I thought you were going to shred this one. Pleasantly surprised. I like it. Especially since it comes in 762x39. It is the sickest ak on the planet.
I like. I Love it! I want a lot more of it!
The banger at the end of the video 🕺🏼
PSA needs to copy this lower. I think it looks sick. I want to put a uintah precision bolt action upper on one
JACL upper and all.
Your pmags are cool. I'd prefer some Hop ones, though. 🙃
Ordering one. Going to swap out the stock for wood.
SIG does the FightLite SCR/Foxtrot Mike Ranch rifle for almost 2.5x the price. My preference is the side charging Foxtrot Mike but more options in this style is a good thing.
The JR Mags always crack me up.
Id love to see the Regulator compared and contrasted to the Fightlite SCR.
Great idea... I would buy one if I lived behind enemy lines in California. Also, I would think it wouldnt be a bad sniper set up.. the grip would be similar to a Remington 700... that seemed to work pretty well for decades...
This thing with a Rattler upper would be amazing!
I like the safety as opposed to the crossbolt style that the Fightlite lowers have.
I am here to humbly ask if James can do a review testing the PSA AR15.