Buy Now, or Wait for 4K 240Hz QD OLED Monitors
Vložit
- čas přidán 5. 12. 2023
- Thank you to Ruipro for sponsoring this video!
Buy the Ruipro HDMI 2.1 Certified Fiber Optic Cable: amzn.to/432NDGS
Buy Ruipro Cables: ruipro.store/collections/all
Get access to all my ICC profiles & Discord: / thedisplayguy
Best Value HDR Monitors (Affiliate Links)
4K
($600) 32" INNOCN 4K 144Hz Mini LED: amzn.to/3uoDBV0
($560) 27" KTC 4K 160Hz Mini LED: amzn.to/3urnEgK
($585) 27" KTC 4K 160Hz Mini LED: amzn.to/3MPvd79
($590) 27" INNOCN 4K 160Hz Mini LED: amzn.to/3SSdeRv
($1000) 42" LG 42 C3 120Hz OLED: howl.me/ck20SqLuGoo
1440p
($400) 27” KOORUI GN10 1440p 240Hz Mini LED: amzn.to/3uxK6Vn
($400) 27" KTC 1440p 165Hz Mini LED: amzn.to/3MREv2w
($630) 27” KTC 27 1440p 240Hz OLED: amzn.to/49OMw22
($836) 27" ASUS 1440p 240Hz OLED: amzn.to/482SevN
($1,100) 49" Samsung OLED G9 (Smart): howl.me/ck20VNR6iGc
($900) 34" Samsung OLED G8: howl.me/ck20VwvW2hU
#BestBuyPartner #SamsungPartner #NeweggPartner #affiliate
(As an Amazon & Howl Affiliate member I earn commission off the above affiliate links)
Buy Now, or Wait for 4K 240Hz QD OLED Monitors
I see you there wailing and gnashing your teeth at the idea of waiting, yet so many people have told you just that. Wait until January to buy a new monitor because we’ll have so many better OLED monitors to choose from included the forbidden fruit, 4K 240Hz glossy QD OLED, but will they actually be available in January, and should you really wait, or is buying now at a much lower price the better choice
All amazon links are affiliate links. I earn commission based on your purchases.
Music
www.davidcuttermusic.com - Věda a technologie
Thank you to Ruipro for sponsoring this video!
Buy the Ruipro HDMI 2.1 Certified Fiber Optic Cable: amzn.to/432NDGS
Buy Ruipro Cables: ruipro.store/collections/all
Get access to all my ICC profiles & Discord: patreon.com/TheDisplayGuy
Best Value HDR Monitors (Affiliate Links)
4K
($600) 32" INNOCN 4K 144Hz Mini LED: amzn.to/3uoDBV0
($560) 27" KTC 4K 160Hz Mini LED: amzn.to/3urnEgK
($585) 27" KTC 4K 160Hz Mini LED: amzn.to/3MPvd79
($590) 27" INNOCN 4K 160Hz Mini LED: amzn.to/3SSdeRv
($1000) 42" LG 42 C3 120Hz OLED: howl.me/ck20SqLuGoo
1440p
($400) 27” KOORUI GN10 1440p 240Hz Mini LED: amzn.to/3uxK6Vn
($400) 27" KTC 1440p 165Hz Mini LED: amzn.to/3MREv2w
($630) 27” KTC 27 1440p 240Hz OLED: amzn.to/49OMw22
($836) 27" ASUS 1440p 240Hz OLED: amzn.to/482SevN
($1,100) 49" Samsung OLED G9 (Smart): howl.me/ck20VNR6iGc
($900) 34" Samsung OLED G8: howl.me/ck20VwvW2hU
#BestBuyPartner #SamsungPartner #NeweggPartner #affiliate
(As an Amazon & Howl Affiliate member I earn commission off the above affiliate links)
We need 4K 27inch 240Hz OLED monitors! My Acer X27P 4K 120Hz IPS from 2018 is still one of the best monitors.
I'm worried that when I get the 32" they will announce this, which is what I really want!
It is not. It is matte.
The problem for someone in Australia for example is that the price of the OLED screens are still high even for current gen, and I doubt the new monitors will be too much more expensive. There's also the issue that half the products such as some AOC mini LEDs, KTC monitors are all not available here, so we're stuck with the main brands.
100% wait. NO Questions. Between Gen 2 and the significant improvement on the text clarity and the possibility of DP 2.0 inclusion.
Depends on screen size. For 4k screen you need bigger than 27" for it to make sense I think.
I still have my ultrawide 34inch acer monitor 120hz monitor that I bought back in 2018. I'm really looking into upgrading to an OLED display and 2024 looks like it might be my year. Excited to hopefully grab the curved 32in alienware
I have not bought any display lower than 150ppi since 2016. That's not going to change. 4k OLED 240Hz is the final step from my 4K 144Hz IPS displays.
I spent $1500 on my LG CX 48 back in 2019/2020. I can definitely wait for an upgrade in these new panels coming out 2024. Glossy is a must and a 4k 240hz panel will be a good panel for future graphics cards (5090? 6090?) to make the most of the technology.
hdmi does not support this refresh rate
@@level80888most people on pc don’t use hdmi. Console gamers do. Display port is more than capable of 4k 240 though.
@@level80888DP 1.4 does
Who cares about hdmi lol
DP 2.1 it is, the monitor has 2.1 DP@@level80888
@@level80888 huh? my lg 45 ultragear 1440p 240hz that im viewing to use as i type this is using hdmi to a 4090...wtf are you talking about?
$550 for KTC is wild. That price, why not.. Esp if that’s all your rig can run.
If on the higher end, ‘24 looks amazing for monitors
Nice video! Buy now, wait for new and buy then again
I don't really care about resolutions, but due to the weird array of pixels that makes long texts unreadable , I would wait for 4k to use it as an ultimate monitor
in 2025 LG's got a couple 4k 240hz oled's coming out with better text clarity. The W (white layer) in WRGB was making text look goofy so they're moving the W layer to a different spot for better-looking text.
I want to buy a 45-inch 21:9 LG 45GR95QE monitor. But the price constantly fluctuates around 1,200 euros. I don't know whether to buy at this price or wait another 2 months?
1440p is the sweetspot for performance for me. I would even enjoy 24" 1440p for higher ppi.
Waiting of course even if I have to wait until months after release.
The jump from ips to oled wasnt as drastic as some reviewers make it seem when it comes to colors. Sure colors pop a bit more and blacks are true black but what really blew me away was the response time. In fast paced shooters like cod and CS it was night and day! Thats literally the only reason to get an oled. If you want amazing colors and beautiful HDR then get get a micro LED
exactly what I experienced as well
there aren't any micro LED monitors out right now lol... there aren't any micro LED tvs out right now either except for the ones shown by 90+inch ones shown by Sony, LG and Samsung at CES and they're in the tens of thousands...
You're right, I meant QLED. My bad!@@messybeans48
OK, send me the link to get a microled one.
i am perfectly happy with the oled g9. curved, ultrawide, glossy, and a buttery 240hz. the 4090 is an amazing card but it is NOT 240+hz @4k good. 4k is still a very demanding resolution.
I want a monitor that can do both 240hz 1440P and 4k 120hz on a 32 inch form factor. I wouldn’t expect to get 240hz 4k on most games
All OLED of course :)
@@tyronelegstrongiv2206 k
I think they will be cheaper than expected similar to how the qd oled from Alienware was cheaper even on launch. And today its nearly 50% the cost of inital
waiting for 4K 32" 240hz. might also buy 43" Sony A90K
On the dough website, if you look at the project timeline for oled 4k 240hz, nothing is coming out before april-may 2024
I bought the LG 45GR95QE in April and while it's a great monitor, the PPI and matte coating are driving me insane. I'll be selling it the moment the Asus 4k 240 hz 32" monitor launches.
i want to buy a oled monitor but i'm hesitating between the pg34wcdm or the alienware 2725df, i would love the asus since its ultrawide but the woled and mat finish makes me wonder if its really worth it
lol. Only inbred people buy matte.
I’m happy with my 27gr95qe
Currently waiting for OLED 240HZ Glossy monitor
Won’t these current monitors be even cheaper when latest and greatest release in 2024?
1440p 360hz is gonna be the sweet spot. Cards still can't push 4K 240 fps, especially without DLSS 3 frame gen. 1440p looks very good on a 27 inch screen, and I'll take that higher refresh rate all day! Very excited for the 2024 monitor lineup.
I can push that on my pc playing cod
@@xDelee then you’re either lowering settings or playing with DLSS/dynamic resolution, because a 4090 runs around 144 fps on MW3 with maxed settings.
Nobody plays at ultra settings on every game anyway. Plus, no one cares if it can't. We all gonna be getting the new monitors.
You can play a lot of games that haven't been released this year at 4k240hz.
Wait for new monitor, wait for 5090. Is there a way that OLED can evolve to have text clarity that can compete with IPS LED monitors? And also have no burn-in issue?
No, therent.
LG OLED's will have better text clarity in 2025
@@zenon3021 I hope so.
Im saving for one of these new monitors (4k 32inch) just for gta 6 😂 i currently have a 27-inch 1440p 144hz ips, so it'll be a huge upgrade! Although i plan to keep my ips for regular work loads and baby my oled for movies and games.
That's the way to go. You'll be in for a treat no doubt!
GTA 6 isn't coming out until 2025 though
@drunkhusband6257 That's a good thing, prices should be lower and more options to choose from by 2025 😀
Bought the G9 OLED for now, and wait till the 32 inch 4K240Hz will be released in the meanwhile.
4K on my 27 inch and 34” UW are 163PPI, the drop to 140ish PPI might be too much but I’ll be willing to give it a shot. I recently tried the WDF 34” Alienware but the 1440p resolution was immediately noticeable.
@@carloscervantes836 Got the same, I also tried the LG 42 C3 but while it is 4K the PPI is also not that great at a desk distance. Than I tried the G9 57, loved the resolution but couldn't deal with it that it was a mini-led VA panel instead of OLED.
One question I have is when DisplayPort 2.1 going to be available?
Without it, we will have to use DSC as opposed to 4:4:4. Likewise, I would imagine that we need GPUs with this port as well. AMD did so with the 7000 series, but not Nvidia.
That upcoming 39 inch LG sounds so good but knowing it's going to be ruined with matte is a tragedy.
I’m pretty sure MLA isn’t coming to anything but the G series LGs.
But isn't the next 4k 240Hz display only equipped with Display Port 1.4 rather than 2.1? As a result, instead of their specifications, the monitors will only be able to display at a maximum of 4k 120Hz?
Not true. You can reach 4k 240hz with DSC.
I already have a 48" lg C1 oled so i'll wait.
With competitive settings i get close to 200 frames.
How you can only output 120 frames max anyways....
4k is 32 inchs so i cant fold. So ive been looking , Should I get the ASUS ROG 1440P 240HZ OLED now or wait for a possibly better 27inch OLED 1440P monitor? I have a 4090 and 7800x3D
Sell your 4090 and wait for the 6090.
@@edimarrodrigrove3377 or keep 4090 till 2026 then buy 7090
Stupid people drooling at high refresh 4k monitors while not owning anything close to a 4090: "My old low refresh rate 4k 144hz is so old and dusty, I need a 240hz upgrade!"
*Gets 71FPS**
And people with ~$3000 rigs playing at 4K ultra settings with IPS monitors that turn all that into absolute dogshit... What a waste. God forbid they buy OLED and it degrades to the point of looking worse than IPS in 8 years or so, though. Do those people sit on their monitors for that long? I'd get it if they actually do, but I doubt that for some reason.
You can play mine sweep at 4K. It will look good! As well as solitaire! And upscaled 1080p does not look too bad at 4K screen.
I feel like all of you are crying because you won't get a lot of fps.
Not all of the people are gonna use this monitor for gaming only. 😂
@@Shibo4201 And what are they going to use it for that benefits from 240 Hz, doesn't suffer from atypical sub pixel structure and doesn't carry the significantly increased risk of burn-in? I genuinely struggle to imagine. Though there are use cases I may not even be aware of, I feel like those have to be even more niche than products like this already are.
idk why you think they lying. AW/Dell was first to QD-OLED period. and they also said it would be available in January and also around $1500
Still a Samsung panel lol
@Forthepeople21 yes we all know this... what was the point of this comment?
You said AW was first with qdoled but it was actually Samsung . So that was my point
@@Forthepeople21 you're too low of IQ to bother explaining why/how you are wrong.
I'm waiting for 1440p 360hz
i bought the Samsung Odyssey G9 OLED for 980$, haven't gotten it yet, should i keep it or return it and buy a new one in Jan>>???
That's a goddamn steal, man. Are you not satisfied with that beast of a display? If not, then yeah, of course. But it won't be as cheap for sure, and it won't become available that soon as well, I believe.
Sell it. The new 4k Alienware will be the monitor !
I just want a 57" ultrawide 4K monitor with a glossy oled pannel, damn it
57??????? might as well just get a tv bruh
@@Clashy69 If it was on a 16/9 ratio i would say yes, a 55 TV would be good, like LG C1 or C2 55", ahahha.
But i'm looking for an ULTRAWIDE 57", it's basicaly two 32" monitor mushed together, aha.
There is a ultrawide 57" by samsumg but it's mini-led and mate (not glossy).
If a brand make a 57", or something similar, 4k ultrawide OLED and with a glossy finish i'm saving up for 1 to 3 years to buy it.
The problem with mini-led + mate finish is the blacks, i intend to use it for working on dark background stuff and space simulation (lot of dark and black in space, ahaha) !
32"4k240hz curved panel means that we gonna get 57" QD-OLED 1800r 8k-2k. So other oleds will get cheaper
8K on a gaming monitor is the dumbest thing I've ever heard.
@@Skrenja yeap but 57" Neo G9 already exists
So wait, which monitors coming out will have MLA?
Lg…
I think 4K 240hz OLED is good enough for an upgrade until MicroLED gets worked out. I’m coming from two 4K IPS 60Hz monitors.
"Good enough" is quite a bit of an understatement, mate.
If OLED gets brighter I might give it a chance in 2024.
I have a gen 2 qd OLED and use it at 60-70 percent and it's wayyy bright enough lol it is definitely bright enough
What about for those like me that i just start building my gaming pc but i dont have no monitor yet
Just save $3000 for monitor after the rest of the budget!
I'm waiting. To buy the AW3423DWF with a good discount :)
900-1200. They will be more reasonably priced because there’s more competition in the qd oled space. Look at how Samsung is pricing their qd oled displays lately.
lol, even miniled monitors are pricey than this.
Yeah… $2500+ is more likely…
@@haukionkannelno.
@@haukionkannel1000-1200 max.
$1200-$2500 is still cheap considering what mini-led cost. Or rather...what a GPU costs.
The 1440p 360hz sounds right for me depends all on the pricing of the other options.
Can we get a consensus on basically any framerate over 200hz being inconsequential already? Can anyone here honestly tell me they perceive a difference between 200hz and 360hz? Not to mention unless you like playing only Siege and LOL, that 360hz isn't going to be hit very often.
@@TheDeadManSwitch My PC is very strong i hit consistently above 360hz on siege lol I'll be good trust me.
@@wadewhistle4379 Siege is the exact example I gave. I guarantee you aren't hitting above even 240hz on the vast majority of current gen games out there.
So, if you capped the game at 200hz, you probably wouldn't even notice a difference.
@@TheDeadManSwitch The purpose of this monitor is to play high fps competitive games while lookin good why else would i buy this monitor do you even know what audience there targeting? With these monitors probably not.
@@TheDeadManSwitchit's for competitive lol a 4090 can easily do 600 fps 1440p in games like Fortnite, 400 in cod, and like 600 in csgo
What games will I run at 4k 240hz? Tibia?
Overwatch, Counter-strike, Valorant, League of Legends and among many others.
Feel kind of strange to buy a monitor for a dozen specific games at best. Competitive gaming fans are just built differently, though, I guess. I'll never be able to comprehend the mindset. Makes some sense when you're playing the same 2/3 or even 1 game for years fanatically and you also care SO MUCH about input lag & pixel response performance. I simultaneously can and cannot see the point at the same time.
They're going for an even more niche market segment, that's for sure, and I'm quite unhappy about that. I was hoping the manufacturers would go the other direction.
@@juanblanco7898 I feel exactly the same
@Shadowsmoke11 nobody play these games at 32 inch let alone 4k.
Its impossible to focus on 32 as well as on 24 or 27 panel.
@@juanblanco7898No serious competitve gamer is playing at 4K. Hell, many pros are still playing at 1080p. Frames win games.
idk 4k 240hz your gonna need like the nvidia rtx9090 for big games at 4k at those frames lol
I'll gladly wait for the right product.
Haste makes waste...
Mini Led display has very low input lag but the response time is so bad. micro led has very low input lag and has 104 times faster response time then OLED
So in reality we have been over paying for crappy monitors and now the good ones are coming out and we will have to pay double to get what we should have been getting all along.
At 27” 1440p is not such a high dpi but 4k is overkill.
Seems odd that manufacturers are tied unnecessarily to these resolutions.
@@SimonWoodburyForget fair.. I have a 24 and just measured about 1.5 ft away. If I changed to 27 I’d probably push it back a few inches.
2k is a very bad resolution.
We all know that ASUS qdoled 32” 4K will be semi-glossy, hopefully Alienware model will have truly glossy finish
The “semi-glossy” is actually just true glossy. I don’t know why they brand it like that.
@@noidsuperdidn’t know that.. So finish will be exactly the same as on Alienware?
They will all be the same Samsung glossy panel. The only downside is the pink tinting when light is introduced, but light should never be placed in front of any display.
@@thedisplayguyAre they not using the exact same coating like the Alienware ultrawide QD-OLED?
@@thedisplayguy That is not how most homes are built sadly...
Buy now the 27 lg only 700.
I went cheapo with 4k 144hz ips for £230
Glossy. Flat. 1440p. 27". 240+hz. OLED. Why is it so f*cking hard to make one? I am getting fed up waiting for one to release.
Meanwhile, I'm literally using my desktop with my Samsung OLED G8 without any text fringing...
Even the 4090 struggles to run the most demanding games on the highest graphical settings at 4k with a high refresh rate. I'm hoping that 2024 introduces more 1440p 240hz OLED monitors to the market, ideally with improvements over the current options. I'll save 4k for my TV... 1440p makes the most sense for most people when it comes to monitors imo.
Also, where are all of the mini-LED 27" 1440p 240hz monitors? They seem to be non-existent.
There's one in his description
Tell me you've never owned a 4090 before, it eats up all 4k games with ease.
With XeSS on my A770, I run cyberpunk at 60FPS on my UW 4K monitor, both AMD and NV have similar features, it’s surprisingly doable.
@@hisfatness522 I saw that, genuinely surprised me. Glad to know it exists. I hope more competition comes out soon.
@@derekdiablo which games and what refresh rate? I haven't owned a 4090 before, but I've watched a lot of videos about it, and some of the heavy and/or unoptimized games can really make the 4090 struggle from what I've seen.
How about 4k 27'' 165/240hz ?
no
imo 4k 27” cancer bad anyways
@@webber7217 40+ extra ppi compared to 32", wdym bruh
@@unsolved8108 That increased in PPI is unnoticeable to the human eye unless you have way above average vision or are sitting really close to your monitor.
@@noidsuper unnoticeable ?. 40ppi is noticeable unless u got bad vision. You can find some results out there
where are the 24 each oled monitor? 27 is too big i cant play competitive
Buy 32” 4K oled that can run natively at 1080p. It. Should be really good for e-sport games!
I normally have ambient lights on. OLED wouldn't make sense to me and my wallet.
I care to much about text clearity so I'll wait tbh
Say it with me manufactures....................4k..............oled.......................27"...............240hz
Unfortunately the 4K will be curved 😔
It's 1800R so there's hope.
deffo wait
I dont get why anyone would buy a glossy monitor and i really hope the manufacturers will not fall again for glossy displays as monitors. There was a time when this was en vouge, and it was awfull. There where like three to five decent monitors to choose from.
Matte coatings are complete utter trash. Glossy allows the screen to look as clear as possible without any crap covering it up 🤢
Glossy gives you hard and distracting reflections if you are not living in a very dark room, as i don't. So i find the coating that Dell uses for most of their Ultrasharp monitors the near perfect balance of clearness and reflection handling
No.@@rulbinger
Glossy is better.
Glossy > matte.
New release, overpriced, untested properly by users, no GPU in sight to drive such refresh rate in anything other than tetris and chess. Nah pass. If it costs over $500 it aint worth for non proplayer/prosumers
Finally a reasonable take. What's worth it and what's not is really dependent on the person, but otherwise... These specs are incredibly niche.
shoulda made it 165hz
ew
@@akeemmorrison2589 probably woulda been alot cheaper & with perfect motion clarity you know it’ll be fast.. what games do you max 240fps on other than like three maybe
Buying these new monitors worth thousands of dollars only for them to become duds after 3 years? No thanks, I'll wait forever. OLED ain't it, chief.
You don't need to wait that long micro OLED comes between 2026 and 2028 so not to long does aperently don't have burn in risk like the apple vision don't have burn in risk but that's because it's micro OLED
LOL. Just say you didn’t come from money…it’s okay, man. 😂
@@relent107 money definitely not my issue I have 4090 and a 7900 xtx and 3 4k monitors
What do you think they break as soon as you hit the 3 year mark?
@@XeqtrM1 4K monitors are as low as like $150 now…I was joking though, but in all seriousness, why do you think “OLED ain’t it”. It’s……..literally it. It, and its sidekicks like QDOLED, are quite literally the best display technology to ever exist. Having every pixel be its own perfect light source? There is quintessentially no better way to display an image.
hopefully they'll fix their shity glossy too. black looks very purpleish shit on last gen AW and samsung qd oled
4k 27inch 240hz oled is what im after brother, cut this 34 inch crap out of here lmao :P
🤡🤦♂️
@@NWOResistance what's so funny clowny 🤔😋
4k 240hz lol for what csgo? Nothing else is going to get 240hz at 4k.
Solitaire does! As well as mine sweep!