Panasonic Lumix FZ2500/FZ2000 vs Panasonic GH5
Vložit
- čas přidán 23. 01. 2018
- In this video I compare the Panasonic FZ2500/FZ2000 with the Panasonic GH5. I talk about some of the pros and cons of the FZ2500 and where I think it shines as well as some test footage comparing both the GH5 and the FZ2500.
🇺🇸USA Links (B&H Photo)
Panasonic G85 - bhpho.to/2FG8Opw
Panasonic GH5 - bhpho.to/2FEGl3H
Links through to B&H are affiliate links. - Věda a technologie
Hopefully this video is helpful. If you have any questions please let me know.
What is that finger aberration at 2:17 lol. It's like something I get from Twixtor.
Great video! Would love to know what your typical settings are on the FZ2500 for video?
For quick, easy shooting outside when light is changing, I usually shoot in S-priority, auto ISO, ND filter auto. Would you recommend a different setup?
The one push button stable automatic and continuous zoom in or out in the fz-2500 is unique and fantastic, just like a camcorder.
Yup, this video did help. I find your videos to be extremely helpful and informative. Thanks!
Just shot my cousin's wedding in 4k on the fz2500, video was great, and the ability take pics at the same time was a real plus.
The Panorama mode was great for a shot of the entire wedding party..
Thanks, great video. Another good pairing I have found is the FZ2500 and G85. The G85 lacks a few of the more pro video features but it does allow for a more shallow depth of field depending on the lens. They use the same battery too which is pretty sweet. I had been thinking about upgrading my FZ2500 but you remind me just how great and versatile this camera is. Thanks!
Wow ! I was was about to upgrade from a FZ2000 to a G9 with a couple of lenses ! I was convinced Camera 1 was the GH5 and was saying to myself yup that looks worth the upgrade !!! Seriously considering keeping the FZ2000 now !
great video
Thank you for your test . It tells me to not upgrade from FZ2500 to GH5 :)
What of issues about AF on Both Cameras?
It was a good idea to compare the difference of those cameras.
I found almost no difference under the sunny light situations,.
I realized an important difference (though it was FZ1000 and GH5)
When I shot the Kabuki show at the big theater with 2 cameras simultaneously.
The difference was at the dark scene under strong spot light.
GH5 +Leica 12-60 compensated the difference beautifully, but FZ1000 didn't do a good job.
Too bright on the face and not enough light on the back..
FZ2500/FZ2000 may be progressed from the older model.
But, I would suggest you to try under similar severe situations.
If you need to know the difference.
Both are good cameras.
I just think that you should have included a low light comparison between the 2. Shooting with the bright sun all over the place can be handled by smaller sensor cameras quite well.
Hallo - does this mean that the picture with the same profile in both basically is the same, and both could be used in the same live stream setup, ands if you run 1080p there would be no crop, right? Thanks!!
Holy moly. Thanks for this blind comparison! Already at the first scene it was 100% obvious which cam had to be which, because one image was so much sharper and had such better color balance than the other. The other cam looks like a smartphone in comparison. And guess what, it turned out to be exactly vice versa, lol. I am still wondering if you don't have those two confused.. because the FZ2500 is the cheaper camera and yet wins by such a large margin.
hi man tnx for realy grate videos
i have ask from the contnuisly recording and batery life of fz2500 and i want it for green screen videos and dacumantry and event recording.
do you suggest it for me?
tnx
Nice comparison! The footage of the FZ2500 looks better ;-)
It's a really great camera hey :-)
Hi great review. I have the GH5 and g80 but was thing of selling the g80 to buy the fz2500 for my cam as it has continous shooting with no time limit, Nd filters variable frame rate which all are features that can match my GH5 when using 2 cameras for video. But I am still concerned about the one inch sensor. Just was wondering what would be your thought as the fz2500 for if I did not want to carry my GH5 with vibe lenses, rig , etc I t could be useful to carry this all in one camera. Any thoughts would be appreciated. Thanks
Thanks for the test, very useful to see the 2 side by side without hype or preknowledge of the results.
I was dead set on the 2500, but that stability test result is off putting. Can anyone who owns the 2500 give me feedback on if the poor 4K video stability hampers your usage or how you compensate if it does? Someone suggested that the results was due to the fact that the 2500 does not have full stability in 4K video, so if I'm shooting 1080P, is the stability comparable to the GH5? If not the 2500, what other bridge camera has better stability in 4K video? Thanks for any replies
what is camera 2?
Love my FZ2500. About the 4k cropping. Most see it as a negative but for me (I use full zoom a lot) in 4k, the ability to zoom from 36mm to 720mm gives the equivalent of a 30 x optical zoom. Or am I wrong?
That's about right.
Hi i have both cameras,in your test except for the last clips[stability test] the FZ2000 was better,i find quality results from mine on par with each other,you were asked if you used 1080P on the GH5 what would be the point.
I would like to make a film which one is best answer please
Very good, mate. As they say 'The proof is left to student" ...as it should be.
Does anybody know if there is a way to attach an interchangeable lens to the fz-2500?
If you want to do that you’ll need a GH5.
Goodness me, in every single clip Camera 1 didn't just look better it looked lots better.
I own and use 4 Lumix cameras with 4K capability
FZ1000, FZ300, GX8 and LX100.
I love the lenses on the Super Zooms and have been agonising if it is worth upgrading to the FZ2500.
Reason being that many reviewers gave the newer lens a bad wrap.
Any experiences in practice amongst owners here?
Thanks!
@pierre pouget Thanks for the heads up 🍺
Jumping!
For cam cost and lens costs I have to go with the FZ 2000 (which I own. And the FZ1000) but under low light my FZ 2000 is pretty useless! I just can't reduce the noise... unless I use a de-noiser in post (Im talking about video footage).
I think the FZ2500 looked better, the video of you inside actually looked a bit soft.
Hi. Thanks for this great review. It looks like both cameras; the FZ2500 and the GH5 are very similar with visual productivity. The Camera 2 - Which you didn't stipulate was related to each camera, seems to bit a tad bit warmer in color tone. But most people probably won't be able to tell the difference between the quality of the two cams.
I also heard that the FZ2500 has a problem with light variation when zooming in and out. Did you experience that issue with the FZ2500?
Hi Tommy, yes it does change a little bit when zooming. I just posted a review of it on the channel too feel free to check it out I mention it in there. :-)
In your comparaison the fz2500 seems to be much sharper but gets more moire and rolling shutter than the GH5... And the gh5 stab's is much much better, maybe because in 4k the fz2500 has only optical stab not fully 5 axis hybrid. A good test should be to compare them in 1080p instead of 4k, sure difference will be much shorter i think
Woh, me encata lo robusto que se ve la Fz2000/2500.
Estoy por comprar mi primera cámara y quisiera saber cuál podrías recomendarme.(orientado al Vídeo/Filmaker)
Lumix G95 (12-60) + un lente 45-150 mm f4.0-5.6 adicional, ó la Fz2000/2500 🤩 de antemano cada uno tiene sus ventajas y desventajas. ¿Que opinas?
Saludos desde Perú ❤️
we have a bunch of fz2500s now for our wedding filming,plus we have a couple of gh5s,got to say the fz2500 gets used alot more so than the gh5,we extended our colour by adding the vlog on the fz2500 so now when we hook them up to our Ninjas running at 10bit 4.2.2 the footage is a tad better then the gh5s but that could be down to the glass,the only real benifit we get from the gh5 is the shooting at 60p,overall if i was going to recomend one it would have to be the FZ simply because for the money your getting a whole lot of camera,mind you the GH5 kicks its ass with stills ,plus the fz has a really annoying sleep mode which after about 10 mins it snoozes and forgets the settings which is a bugger,if anyone knows how to switch sleep mode off please comment or msg us
FZ2500 wins it hands down.. GH5 only has better stabilization,
But I went for Sony A68 18-135 .. about 350$ cheaper than FZ2500..
Like the FZ2000 better. White balance seems to be better. GH5 is only better at stabilisation.
👍😀
Un believable, the Fz2500 has not shown any difference from Gh5 in picture quality because I ad gone vice verse before i knew which camera was which, the only difference I have seen was on stability, Just a slight difference . I wanted by to upgrade frim fz2500 to gh5, but it seems not a big deal
I voted for #1 three times with no differences in the rest. I don't own either camera.
I'm Korean FZ2500 FZ300 GH4 good
Maximum Recording in clip fz 2500
The 2500 looks sharper and slightly better. The GH5 obviously has amazing stabilization though.
WTF!!! Cam one was superior in every case. How? Oh, yeah. These were outdoor shots, so you have the FZ on ND 3. Being an old TV cam guy (ND Wheel) I can tell you ND does a lot more than allow you to use lower fstops. They primarily make a sunny, glarey shot WAY sharper. The gh5 did not (I imagine) have an ND filter on, so this was an unfair comparison.
I guess you shot with GH5 at 1080p mode.
I don't think so or at least I hope not. I never use 1080p anymore unless it for slow mo stuff. I'll take a look and reshoot it if it was. 😆
I seem to be on my own here but the gh5 looked much better to me on all clips except the sign where they level pegged for me.
zoom of fz2000 !!!!
Which one is camera one and which one is camera two??? Uuhhgg!! =/
5:13
This is an interesting comparison and very worthwhile -- BUT - it really isn't a totally accurate, fair "test" -- nor a completely comprehensive comparison. (1) The GH5 is an interchangeable lens body with a vast number of available lenses (both native and 3rd party). This video is going to be influenced by the choice of the Lumix 12-60 as the lens used in the comparison.... What if it had been the Leica version of the 12-60 ? Or a Sigma ? Or a Leica prime ? Or any of the countless number of available lenses ? (2) I don't know what mode of stabilization was used on the GH5 -- depending upon the firmware of the body and the lens -- different types are available (the latest being DUAL I.S 2 -- only available with specific native lenses and firmware)... The GH5 has numerous features lacking in the FZ2500 -- 10 bit can be shot internally not just through the HDMI out. GH5 offers 4k at 60fps. The GH5 can shoot up to 400 mbps internally ! GH5 sensor is micro 4/3 whereas FZ2500 is 1" -- the micro 4/3 is slightly larger (which will affect crop factor, low light capabilities, etc.) Plus there are a vast number of options that the GH5 offers that the FZ2500 doesn't...
To say that the footage of the FZ2500 looks "better" -- may be true in this particular instance... But this is outdoors, in bright light and with one particular lens mounted on the GH5 (with unknown firmware versions on the body and lens).... There is a reason that the original manuf suggested retail price of the GH5 was about double the FZ2500 (and that is the GH5 body alone -- no lens)...
I'm not knocking the FZ2500 at all -- it is a great camera.....but it really isn't in the same category as the GH5....
Hi great comment , what be your view on selling a G85 and buying the FZ2000 as a B cam for my GH5 for the times I don't want to carry the Gh5 and rig, cage ,lenses the FZ000 seems to be a great all in one for those occasions. Any help would be appreciated . Big thanks jF .
@@MyJeanf It could workout fine -- though I don't know whether it is worth selling a G85 and buying the FZ2000 - not sure what your net cost would be and how much of an advantage you'd gain -- If your primary goal is simplicity -- maybe just get a very versatile lens for the G85 instead (and sell any lens(es) you really don't need) and just use that 1 lens -- for example the Lumix 14-140 -- that lens will cover a lot of shooting situations... I personally am using a Sony A6400 with 18-135 as a "B cam" for my GH5 ! Or the other way around ! The A6400 is a very small, light camera ... It has a bigger APS-C sensor (bigger than both the mft of the GH5 and G85 and bigger than the 1" of the FZ) , it is 24 megapixel -- so you get the benefit of slightly better low light performance -- but, more importantly, you get vastly superior autofocus (phase detect) than any of the Lumix cameras (I don't know if that statement would apply to the new S1) - so you might be accomplishing more with something like that correcting the 1 major issue of the Lumix cameras while saving some weight and still getting a lot of range with 1 lens like the 18-135 ... It might cost a few hundred more than the G85 to FZ swap - but might be worth considering...
I have a GH5, a Sony A6400 and a Nikon D850 full frame DSLR ... the disadvantage of my setup is the need to have different glass for all 3 cameras...
@@sclutovic thanks for your comphrensive reply it helps a lot as I was struggling with the idea of changing a MFT sensor for a one inch sensor. I feel you idea of buying the 14-140mm lens is something I did not consider. Thanks again for your input I think I will go the 14-140 route. Ha e a great day Nick . JF
@@MyJeanf My pleasure ....good luck with it !!
great camera except when you zoom in or out you lose focus everytime is there something wrong with mine, i been using all kinds of cameras for many years and
this is manual or auto focus, i am errol