Nice to see someone else bothered by this modern trend. Drives me absolutely nuts every time people do it, I want to know what the justification is for it here.
I would be surprised if there is a 9900X3D, considering the 7900X3D isn't doing that well sales wise. I think AMD is better off leaving out the 9900X3D and just launching the 9800X3D and 9950X3D.
The 7900X3D only isn't doing well because the 3D V-Cache is only usable on 6 of the 12 cores. Making it worse for gaming than the 7800X3D which has all it's 8 cores with the 3D V-Cache. If the 9900X3D was a 12 core/24 thread CPU with all 12 cores using the 3D V-Cache it would be far better off than the very stupidly designed 7900X3D. The 7900X3D just shouldn't exist in it's current form.
@@krullexneoI'm in agreement, make both ccds 3D v-cache on the new one 9900x3D(heck I even advocate for doing the same to the 9950x3D and shutting off the cache when the application doesn't call for it for example, it doesn't make sense to me why both ccds wouldn't have the extra cache when the situation calls for it and can say "I don't need this much cache" when the situation doesn't).
The 9900 model is used to sell the faulty CCDs produced that might have up to two faulty cores or can't reach the speed spec needed to be included on a 9950 model. That's CPU made to cut manufacturing loses. Intel does the same with their mid and low range CPUs. based on this leaked benchmark. Performance for the 9950X should be excellent on multicore tests as it will have less effective latency due the 8 cores CCD instead of the 6 on the leser model.
@@krullexneo Heard they will solve that CCD issue in Zen 6. Being all placed on a interposer via chiplet and significantly reduce CCD latency. In that case a single V3D cache will not hinder gaming performance for 12 or 16 cores Zen 6.
The 7000 series was very expensive when it launched. It's much cheaper now. The 7900 is a cut-down version of the 7950 and sold much cheaper to appeal to bargain hunters. I bought the 5900X because the 5950X was too expensive based on $/workload. Since the AM5 platform is here to stay till 2027, I may not pay the extra money for the 9950X3D if the 9900X3D is 5% slower but 10-15% cheaper. It all depends on the thermals of the new chips too. And by the time the Zen 6 or 7 arrives, I could upgrade anyway.
Damn. I wonder how userbullshitbenchmarks will handle the Ryzen 9 beating the 14900k in single core benchmarks. I'm guessing the verbal gymnastics will be LEGENDARY on this one!!!
Its being compared to a soon to be 1 year old chip lmao. still cant win in multi threading. when intel releases their new chips here soon amd will once a gain be in the dust
@@iequalsnoob intel themselves have said the new Chips will LOSE in multi threaded workloads vs the 14900k/s Intel are going for the gaming crown to try and win VS X3D chips form AMD.. What you said is not likely to happen
Intel will not win anything without having 2 separate 360mm liquid coolers to cool their ridiculously hot and power hungry chips.. Even then it's a longshot. Next gen chips won't be any better than their 14th gen in performance especially in perf. Per watt. Honestly dunno why people latch on to one company's nutsack so hard instead of literally looking at the numbers. Just as said before Intel said themselves that 15th gen won't beat AMD at multi-threading and probably not at single threading at this rate. If they do it won't be enough to justify the horrible power use and cooling requirements for lack luster improvement. @@iequalsnoob
@@iequalsnoobyah right, intel can’t even make their recent I9s stable for gaming/work without needing a 360mm aio (while still overheating). Lmao even with the cooling they are just straight up dying.
I don't mind either type of video you make, meaning these talking head or the fully edited videos, but I do think those camera side shots maybe look a little bit odd and I'm not sure if they really fit these news/info kinds of videos very well. Other than that, keep up the good work! 😄
idk why people are talking about your arms, i personally think you're doing great. I know sometimes using hand gestures can help you be more expressive when presentating
@@dreadtrain2846 Sad I need to explain to you "overexaggerating" isn't a word, as "exaggerating" already means you're overdoing something. That silly expression is similar to saying "very fantastic" or "extremely atrocious." It's bad English. Sad you didn't understand my comment the first time and I needed to explain it to you like you're a three-year old.
The second cache chiplet would be helping issues that come when scheduler guesses wrong, not as much as correct guess but it would still help. Hit on another cache helps in terms of both bandwidth and latency, but a lot less compared to if it was local.
dude this is so good.....i have an itx build and my 7700x gets 80c when gaming so ill definitly get the 9800x3d so it will help with the hot tempratures and give me extra boost in games...keep us posted please
I wonder when those 9000 chips are released, will motherboards that are CAMM2 compatible be available? If so, I will hold off buying a new motherboard until then.
@@Khalidd7 CAMM2 has been out for quite a while in the laptop space. It's really nothing new, just bringing laptop tech which is identical but superior to the desktop. The ram communicates the same way with the same protocols, it's just a better connector to plug that ram in.
Josh, thank you for your always excellent reporting and keeping us informed out here. I'm especially impressed by the performance of the Ryzen 9000 series. Very cool, and that wasn't even their flagship model! (ʘ_ʘ) May we live in interesting times! All good wishes.
I really want numbers for all the TDP's now. it feels like they are hiding a 35W naughty boi that tops the laptop charts. I wonder at what power draw intel and amd now match. will it be 65W to 200W?
👀Damn that Intel CPU's TDP goes above my GPU's TDP. At max overclock my GPU can draw that much power, but not in July. Right now I'm running underclock on everything.
AMD should have increased the cache on this 9000 generation. That would make this CPUs monsters powerhouses for work. Probably their server counterparts would be unstoppable.
i think i was expecting more than 10% over the 14900k. im due for an upgrade, but i think i will wait for intel 15th gen before making any final decisions. besides, there isnt anything coming out in the near future that should tax my 5 year old system any harder than it is right now.
Sir should I build with amd ryzen 5 7600x or wait for amd k 9000 series or now intel's arrow lake processor is also going to be launched so would it be better to wait or not because i have to build only for gaming and what about intel arrow lakke- it will morepower full than amd ryzen 9000 series
3rd party benchmarks should arrive later this month, if you can wait 20 days or 3 weeks you should get your answer by credible sources, right now noone actually knows
In deed I'm not so impressed by Ryzen 9900X's Geekbench scores. Just tested my 7900X (Geekbench 6.3 though) these days and it results ST 3.032 und MT 19.086. It is also limited to the 120W profile intended for the X3D chips - and the Curve-Optimizer is applying a simple -20 all-core tweak. RAM also is rather common 6.000MT/s CL36. While 3.401 ST seems a good 12% increase compared to a slightly tuned 7900 - the MT performance hopefully improves until release. As the tester still used the older Geekbench 6.2 maybe the scores differ - or at least the test-data is already somewhat older (Geekbench 6.3 was released in April)
very few can pay expensive gpus, the sales are in mid range, the money comes from there, entry level is being destroyed by apus, that is the market now
I hate how all these HW news channels flip flop on the news constantly for sake of views. Not long ago we were told 9000 series was a FAIL, now its a big WIN... flip flopping the news constantly. Cheap way of getting views.
In theory HALO could come to desktop if they used CXL, however, i'd expect the maximum speed over this bus would be 5600MT/s would still be faster than 2 channels at 8000 but not as good as laptops and sff with true dedicated quad channel
I'm going to be mad if they release the 9950X3D with v-cache on only 1 CCD again... That was a STUPID move last gen and doing it again is only going to hurt sales, like it did last time.
Geekbench 6 Multithread score are broken, please refrain from using them as reference. They basically use multithread in a "realist" gaming situation, it barely use more than 6 cores. So for any cpu superior to 6 core, these numbers are unreliable as a fair comparaison...
That's not even all, the Ryzen 5 9600X has a single thread score of 3,284 which is 6% faster than the 14900K... even AMD's Ryzen 5 will beat Intel's current best CPU, Intel better have the 15th gen ready otherwise they are gonna be in trouble.
these multithreadded scores are awful, the 7945hx from nearly 2 years ago, which is a literal laptop chip, scores 33K in cinebench, so the top end desktop 9900x more than TWO YEARS later only scoring 34k is an absolutely laughable "upgrade"
Im a software engineer and i will always choose intel because of the architecture. AMD's ingunity fabric is still too slow and when i run unoptimized multi-threaded tasks, intel always finishes about 4x as fast and even an 8 core will finish tasks ywice as fast as an AMD 16 core
That’s way too late for RDNA 4. Nvidia will have had their whole lineup out by then. We’ll be talking about Nvidia 6000 series. That’s a horrible release cadence.
Disappointed 9950x3D isn't double vcache chiplets.I don't give a damn about overclocking. My 3900x will soldier on until AMD offers what I want to upgrade. I really don't need to upgrade with a 12 core anyway but will once AMD figures it out.
What are you talking about? the 9900X is only +5% than 7900X on MT is a miserable difference @error margin; and you bring this e-magazine title: that the 9000 series is +100% the 7000 series, completely BS, in ST is only +15% This is just Zen 4+. Cinebench23 @170W if Sampoles reach at least 35K, the difference is 19.72% will see if that's somewhat sustainable across the board of apps. Don't bring misleading Titles from hype e-magazines, it's BS, nothing works on BS, but in facts
@@supernice_auto yeah thats my fault for not mentioning specifics. I am just frustrated that they will force us to wait longer on GPU. Now I have to save longer and longer instead of just paying part of it at Christmas.
higher is better: efficiency intel i714700k 253w points per watt: 139= 50% ryzen 9 9900x 170w points per watt: 202= 55,4% ryzen 9 9900x 120w points per watt: 275= 100% (base effi) intel i7 13700k 252w points per watt: 122= 44,36% ryzen 9 7900x 170w points per watt: 171= 61,65% so the ryzen 9 9900x at 120watts is the cpu with best efficiency ever more watts more power isnt everytime true :D edit: lol i forget the 13700k...and fixed :D
AMD keeps intentionally making the wrong decisions. They have the RX 8000 GPUs ready, but they delayed the release until next year. They have the big Strix Halo APU ready, but they won't even tell us when it'll release. They are also making the exact same X3D blunder they made with this generation of X3D chips with the next lineup, with the 12-core and 16-core models not including the 3D cache on the second CCD. This is completely unacceptable! AMD is trying to make us hate them, I swear.
Visit piavpn.com/GamerMeld for 83% off Private Internet Access! That's just $2.03 a month!
this is like watchin someone having a seizure.. calm your sperg twitches
bro your arms are out of control lol
wow those numbers are nutso
Ikr @@s7r49
🙋💁🙆🙅🤷🧏🤸🤹🕺
Respect the game, he spitting some resizable bars 🔥
so many leaks, bro straight swimmin
You're gonna have to flap harder if you expect to take flight...
Like a hummingbird.
I'm getting close though! lol
I felt the breeze from my kitchen. Maybe the CPU cooler went out and he's just keeping his hardware cool.
I can listen to you but man fecking sit still.
Lmao, btw what does your Cap say?@@GamerMeld
Please, no more constant camera switching. Really don't need that side view of you looking at the other camera. Very jarring and distracting.
Shut up. Softy
No that camera should always be on there
I liked it - it wasn't jarring for me as I have a high refresh Ultrawide 😂😂
Nice to see someone else bothered by this modern trend. Drives me absolutely nuts every time people do it, I want to know what the justification is for it here.
1:39 FYI, Q2 does not mean "second half of the year". Q2 is "2nd Quarter of the year", which spans from the beginning of April to the end of June.
I would be surprised if there is a 9900X3D, considering the 7900X3D isn't doing that well sales wise. I think AMD is better off leaving out the 9900X3D and just launching the 9800X3D and 9950X3D.
The 7900X3D only isn't doing well because the 3D V-Cache is only usable on 6 of the 12 cores. Making it worse for gaming than the 7800X3D which has all it's 8 cores with the 3D V-Cache. If the 9900X3D was a 12 core/24 thread CPU with all 12 cores using the 3D V-Cache it would be far better off than the very stupidly designed 7900X3D. The 7900X3D just shouldn't exist in it's current form.
@@krullexneoI'm in agreement, make both ccds 3D v-cache on the new one 9900x3D(heck I even advocate for doing the same to the 9950x3D and shutting off the cache when the application doesn't call for it for example, it doesn't make sense to me why both ccds wouldn't have the extra cache when the situation calls for it and can say "I don't need this much cache" when the situation doesn't).
The 9900 model is used to sell the faulty CCDs produced that might have up to two faulty cores or can't reach the speed spec needed to be included on a 9950 model. That's CPU made to cut manufacturing loses. Intel does the same with their mid and low range CPUs. based on this leaked benchmark. Performance for the 9950X should be excellent on multicore tests as it will have less effective latency due the 8 cores CCD instead of the 6 on the leser model.
@@krullexneo Heard they will solve that CCD issue in Zen 6. Being all placed on a interposer via chiplet and significantly reduce CCD latency. In that case a single V3D cache will not hinder gaming performance for 12 or 16 cores Zen 6.
The 7000 series was very expensive when it launched. It's much cheaper now. The 7900 is a cut-down version of the 7950 and sold much cheaper to appeal to bargain hunters. I bought the 5900X because the 5950X was too expensive based on $/workload.
Since the AM5 platform is here to stay till 2027, I may not pay the extra money for the 9950X3D if the 9900X3D is 5% slower but 10-15% cheaper. It all depends on the thermals of the new chips too.
And by the time the Zen 6 or 7 arrives, I could upgrade anyway.
Damn. I wonder how userbullshitbenchmarks will handle the Ryzen 9 beating the 14900k in single core benchmarks. I'm guessing the verbal gymnastics will be LEGENDARY on this one!!!
Its being compared to a soon to be 1 year old chip lmao. still cant win in multi threading. when intel releases their new chips here soon amd will once a gain be in the dust
@@iequalsnoob intel themselves have said the new Chips will LOSE in multi threaded workloads vs the 14900k/s Intel are going for the gaming crown to try and win VS X3D chips form AMD.. What you said is not likely to happen
Intel will not win anything without having 2 separate 360mm liquid coolers to cool their ridiculously hot and power hungry chips.. Even then it's a longshot. Next gen chips won't be any better than their 14th gen in performance especially in perf. Per watt. Honestly dunno why people latch on to one company's nutsack so hard instead of literally looking at the numbers. Just as said before Intel said themselves that 15th gen won't beat AMD at multi-threading and probably not at single threading at this rate. If they do it won't be enough to justify the horrible power use and cooling requirements for lack luster improvement. @@iequalsnoob
Intel is falling behind with every next gen more and more I doubt AMD will be left in the dust anytime soon.@@iequalsnoob
@@iequalsnoobyah right, intel can’t even make their recent I9s stable for gaming/work without needing a 360mm aio (while still overheating). Lmao even with the cooling they are just straight up dying.
I don't mind either type of video you make, meaning these talking head or the fully edited videos, but I do think those camera side shots maybe look a little bit odd and I'm not sure if they really fit these news/info kinds of videos very well.
Other than that, keep up the good work! 😄
Its better withe the camera side shots
Did he just turn Italian?
I'm drooling over here over the
AMD Ryzen 9 9900X3D
CPU. ❤
I am still using an
AMD Ryzen 9 3900X
Me 2 man im still using the ryzen 5 3600x, and have just been for a good time to upgrade
same
im still using my 8700k lmao
Same here 3900x with ausus strix 2080 ti
3900X? Until 4th of July, I was still rocking an FX-8350 with a GTX 970, I've now jumped to a 7950X with an RTX4080 super.
5:32 That's what she said
🌚🌚
@@_Paul. I can't unhear that now.
Ricky Bobby doesn’t know what to do with his arms lol
Flailing hands jutsu
idk why people are talking about your arms, i personally think you're doing great. I know sometimes using hand gestures can help you be more expressive when presentating
Cool hat with the "悟" logo in kanji.
The total amount of L3 Cache feels lacking...I want more.
plus the fact that can make negative curve in pbo after optimizing, add some mhz, could draw less energy e gain more score.
I like how both a laptop and a desktop design for Strix Halo is shown
I like the news this guy gives, but his body movements are uncannily overexagerrated
Thats the best part!
As opposed to underexaggerated?
@@chesshooligan1282 As opposed to regular movements. Sad I had to explain that to you.
@@dreadtrain2846 Sad I need to explain to you "overexaggerating" isn't a word, as "exaggerating" already means you're overdoing something. That silly expression is similar to saying "very fantastic" or "extremely atrocious." It's bad English. Sad you didn't understand my comment the first time and I needed to explain it to you like you're a three-year old.
@@chesshooligan1282 Sad that you got butthurt over what we all knew he meant. Very sad.
Would love to build a new AMD beast with these new x3d chips, sadly I have bills
your compressor working it's magic comparing your voice to what energy on your cam shows
remember when ryzen first gen launched....people were amazed with ryzen 5 1600, ryzen 7 1800, etc, how time passed. it's unreal.
Shit did you start getting sign language courses on Brilliant?
Did him dirty 😂
The second cache chiplet would be helping issues that come when scheduler guesses wrong, not as much as correct guess but it would still help.
Hit on another cache helps in terms of both bandwidth and latency, but a lot less compared to if it was local.
2:46 you surprised me here. You got a lot of bass. Are you in a choir?
Give this man dumbbells and he'll be fit in a month
Yep I'm 'pumped' for the impossibility to acquire any one of them at release.
Bro Talks with Arms moving in air rather using his jaws to move up and down
Give the guy a break, his day job is ground air traffic controller... ✈👋👋🖐👐
Here we go!! 5800X3D will have a nice replacement!!!
dude this is so good.....i have an itx build and my 7700x gets 80c when gaming so ill definitly get the 9800x3d so it will help with the hot tempratures and give me extra boost in games...keep us posted please
Cutting to the shot with the door in the background breaks the immersion.
I like his great voice. Plus efficient in story telling. Thank you
I wonder when those 9000 chips are released, will motherboards that are CAMM2 compatible be available? If so, I will hold off buying a new motherboard until then.
CAMM2 its new standard so don't be a guinea pig
@@Khalidd7 CAMM2 has been out for quite a while in the laptop space. It's really nothing new, just bringing laptop tech which is identical but superior to the desktop. The ram communicates the same way with the same protocols, it's just a better connector to plug that ram in.
Will Ryzen 9000+ be on AM5 socket? (stupid question but not 100% sure)
Yes.
From what I can guess based off of am4 am5 will probably get new releases until ryzen 11,000
Ryzen 9000 series will be on AM5. Other cpus we don't know, but it's very likely.
They have confirmed that 9000 series at least will be
Yes
Amd's new Cpu: it's over 9000
First the 5 series then the 8 series and now the 9 series...... All the benchmarks are supposedly unreal. AMD is one thing, good value for money.
Oof, that new camera angle is distracting.
X3D? More like "Amazing; can't wait to see!" 👍
mITX Strix Halo compatible with regular coolers is what we desperately need
Video is great as usual, but please, can you use some extension to make white pages not to burn our eyes?
Very curious - Thanks for your well done video.
10:43 14700K absolutely does NOT have an "absolute maximum power draw" of 253W WTF ? What was it when it was running at 320+ Watts ?
Josh, thank you for your always excellent reporting and keeping us informed out here. I'm especially impressed by the performance of the Ryzen 9000 series. Very cool, and that wasn't even their flagship model! (ʘ_ʘ) May we live in interesting times! All good wishes.
Has anyone done hash rate rating with the 9000 series yet on Qubic,Zeph, and what other CPU coin.
Yes and it's nothing special.
@@christophermullins7163 Thanks so it's like the 5900 was to the 3900 nothing special like you said .
@@christophermullins7163 How do you know? These CPUs are not out yet.
@@christophermullins7163 🤥🤥🤥
@@christophermullins7163 where can i find this info??
I'm holding off getting a new computer. My 8600K+1070 Sea Hawk is dated, but I'm conflicted between going X3D+RX or 8000-series G/APU.
Well 1070 GTX is enough if u wonder APU....
It's over 9000!!!
*CAN'T wait for AMD X5D, or X6D CPU's*
Does anyone know which of the coming X3d chips will be the best for gaming? Should I be looking at the 9950X3d or the 9800X3d
What is bro trying to tell us with his hands ??
I really want numbers for all the TDP's now.
it feels like they are hiding a 35W naughty boi that tops the laptop charts.
I wonder at what power draw intel and amd now match.
will it be 65W to 200W?
cant wait for the ryzen 9 9950x3Dxtx with both ccd's with 3d cache
I really want a 9800x3d for my new build
👀Damn that Intel CPU's TDP goes above my GPU's TDP. At max overclock my GPU can draw that much power, but not in July. Right now I'm running underclock on everything.
AMD should have increased the cache on this 9000 generation. That would make this CPUs monsters powerhouses for work. Probably their server counterparts would be unstoppable.
Ryzen 9800X3D 😱😱😱😱😱😱
I'm pumped for a 9950x3D chip - now I just need to pick a new motherboard (extended - lots of slots)
i think i was expecting more than 10% over the 14900k. im due for an upgrade, but i think i will wait for intel 15th gen before making any final decisions. besides, there isnt anything coming out in the near future that should tax my 5 year old system any harder than it is right now.
Sir should I build with amd ryzen 5 7600x or wait for amd k 9000 series or now intel's arrow lake processor is also going to be launched so would it be better to wait or not because i have to build only for gaming and what about intel arrow lakke- it will morepower full than amd ryzen 9000 series
sooo.. should i wait for 9900x or head on with the current 7800x3d? assuming im using a b650m motherboard
3rd party benchmarks should arrive later this month, if you can wait 20 days or 3 weeks you should get your answer by credible sources, right now noone actually knows
this aged like milk
He playing Orchestra with those arms
In deed I'm not so impressed by Ryzen 9900X's Geekbench scores.
Just tested my 7900X (Geekbench 6.3 though) these days and it results ST 3.032 und MT 19.086.
It is also limited to the 120W profile intended for the X3D chips - and the Curve-Optimizer is applying a simple -20 all-core tweak. RAM also is rather common 6.000MT/s CL36.
While 3.401 ST seems a good 12% increase compared to a slightly tuned 7900 - the MT performance hopefully improves until release.
As the tester still used the older Geekbench 6.2 maybe the scores differ - or at least the test-data is already somewhat older (Geekbench 6.3 was released in April)
Well disappointed about AMD not targeting the high end gpu wise
very few can pay expensive gpus, the sales are in mid range, the money comes from there, entry level is being destroyed by apus, that is the market now
nahhhh these comments talking bout freestyle swimming 💀
What are you doing with the chair? 🤣
Gamer Meld why do you use a Voice Changer ? Thanks!
I hate how all these HW news channels flip flop on the news constantly for sake of views.
Not long ago we were told 9000 series was a FAIL, now its a big WIN... flip flopping the news constantly.
Cheap way of getting views.
There are 2 things I wait for ryzen: 3 CCDs and/or all 3D V-cache, it won't be this time.
In theory HALO could come to desktop if they used CXL, however, i'd expect the maximum speed over this bus would be 5600MT/s would still be faster than 2 channels at 8000 but not as good as laptops and sff with true dedicated quad channel
Still gonna wait for Radeon to have the same moment as what ryzen is having rn.
Maybe they want to make a big leap in the high end cards, I guess it should take more time and money now
actually... now just looking forward to 8000 series gpus on an APU so that my next minipc doesn't suck. ;-)
Is that a new camera
Zen5 is amazing
whats with the camera angles? Old style was better
I'm going to be mad if they release the 9950X3D with v-cache on only 1 CCD again... That was a STUPID move last gen and doing it again is only going to hurt sales, like it did last time.
I feel sad for Intel. I feel excited about upgrading to these AMD processors, and just BLAH about intel's furnaces.
Geekbench 6 Multithread score are broken, please refrain from using them as reference. They basically use multithread in a "realist" gaming situation, it barely use more than 6 cores. So for any cpu superior to 6 core, these numbers are unreliable as a fair comparaison...
Q2 means Spring. 2H means 2nd half.
Said to be...
3 bios later.....
The 9900x are just 20% faster with those boost profiles. 14% without.
That's not even all, the Ryzen 5 9600X has a single thread score of 3,284 which is 6% faster than the 14900K... even AMD's Ryzen 5 will beat Intel's current best CPU, Intel better have the 15th gen ready otherwise they are gonna be in trouble.
How do you speak so smoothly?
whats 9000xd vs the normal 9000? im so confused
Good show man.
I expect AMD to drop R9 5900X3D and R9 5950X3D in 2025 just for the meme
these multithreadded scores are awful, the 7945hx from nearly 2 years ago, which is a literal laptop chip, scores 33K in cinebench, so the top end desktop 9900x more than TWO YEARS later only scoring 34k is an absolutely laughable "upgrade"
Cinebench is literally one benchmark lol
Im a software engineer and i will always choose intel because of the architecture. AMD's ingunity fabric is still too slow and when i run unoptimized multi-threaded tasks, intel always finishes about 4x as fast and even an 8 core will finish tasks ywice as fast as an AMD 16 core
Hope AMD will have HUUGE performance uplift with rx 9000 (or the other name they could slap on these gpus(
That’s way too late for RDNA 4. Nvidia will have had their whole lineup out by then. We’ll be talking about Nvidia 6000 series.
That’s a horrible release cadence.
*AMD = The ONLY future !*
Disappointed 9950x3D isn't double vcache chiplets.I don't give a damn about overclocking. My 3900x will soldier on until AMD offers what I want to upgrade. I really don't need to upgrade with a 12 core anyway but will once AMD figures it out.
🤣
Cool entrance like graphically challenged, or I should say cpu challenged in this case
What are you talking about? the 9900X is only +5% than 7900X on MT is a miserable difference @error margin; and you bring this e-magazine title: that the 9000 series is +100% the 7000 series, completely BS, in ST is only +15% This is just Zen 4+. Cinebench23 @170W if Sampoles reach at least 35K, the difference is 19.72% will see if that's somewhat sustainable across the board of apps. Don't bring misleading Titles from hype e-magazines, it's BS, nothing works on BS, but in facts
hey Q2 means second quarter in the first half
Missing Christmas is dumb for their GPU's.
Who said anything about missing Christmas
@@supernice_auto They are going to release their cards as CES and in the second quarter of next year.
@@reichfrog2 sorry- i thought you were talking about the amd processors :)
@@supernice_auto yeah thats my fault for not mentioning specifics. I am just frustrated that they will force us to wait longer on GPU. Now I have to save longer and longer instead of just paying part of it at Christmas.
higher is better: efficiency
intel i714700k 253w points per watt: 139= 50%
ryzen 9 9900x 170w points per watt: 202= 55,4%
ryzen 9 9900x 120w points per watt: 275= 100% (base effi)
intel i7 13700k 252w points per watt: 122= 44,36%
ryzen 9 7900x 170w points per watt: 171= 61,65%
so the ryzen 9 9900x at 120watts is the cpu with best efficiency ever more watts more power isnt everytime true :D
edit: lol i forget the 13700k...and fixed :D
Imagine a 3D V cache APU
AMD keeps intentionally making the wrong decisions. They have the RX 8000 GPUs ready, but they delayed the release until next year. They have the big Strix Halo APU ready, but they won't even tell us when it'll release. They are also making the exact same X3D blunder they made with this generation of X3D chips with the next lineup, with the 12-core and 16-core models not including the 3D cache on the second CCD. This is completely unacceptable! AMD is trying to make us hate them, I swear.