DOMESTIC VIOLENCE RESTRAINING ORDER IN CA
Vložit
- čas přidán 17. 11. 2022
- If you need a full overview of the CA divorce process from my perspective, you can buy my book on Amazon: a.co/d/djNFvoH You can book an appointment online here: romanovskalaw.as.me www.romanovskalaw.com/contact... DOMESTIC VIOLENCE RESTRAINING ORDER IN CA
Diana Romanovska Divorce Attorney and a Certified Family Law Specialist in San Francisco, California
www.romanovskalaw.com
T.: 415-347-0584
You can book an appointment online here: romanovskalaw.as.me
Follow me on Facebook here: / familylawcalifornia
and Instagram here:
Ms. Romanovska is a San Francisco family law attorney, licensed to practice in both California and Germany. She is a Certified Family Law Specialist in San Francisco and unique in her field, a rare divorce attorney who is able to provide legal counsel, representation, and mediation services in English, Russian, and German in order to better serve her clients.
Ms. Romanovska previously worked as a prosecutor in the Office of the District Attorney of the Regional Superior Court of Berlin, and for several large firms including Beiten Burghard & Wegner, and Linklaters Oppenhoff & Raedler. She was awarded the Outstanding Pro Bono Award for Family Law Cases by the Justice and Diversity Center for her volunteer work with the Bar Association of San Francisco in 2012 and 2013. She was also selected to the Super Lawyers® Rising Stars℠ list for her high standards of client care and in-depth knowledge of the law. Ms. Romanovska received her J.D. with a concentration in family law from the Freie University School of Law, a research University located in Berlin and one of the most prominent universities in Germany. She received her Master’s Degree (LL.M.) in US Legal Studies from Golden Gate University School of Law in San Francisco.
Ms. Romanovska has been a resident of San Francisco since 2009. She was born in Kiev and lived there until the age of 15 when she moved with her family to Germany. Living in such diverse places has given Ms. Romanovska an understanding of different cultures that helps her thoughtfully practice law and be better connected with each of her clients. When Ms. Romanovska moved to San Francisco, she decided that she wanted to start a boutique family law firm so that she would have the time to really connect with her clients and make a difference in each matter. Ms. Romanovska also has a personal understanding of what it is like to go through a divorce, having been through one herself. This personal experience allows her to empathize with her clients and understand what is important to them.
Ms. Romanovska is regarded as one of the best divorce attorneys in San Francisco. Her breadth of experience in California divorce law includes the areas of child custody and visitation rights; child, spousal and domestic partner support; domestic violence restraining orders; and asset and property division. Beyond Ms. Romanovksa’s expertise as a divorce lawyer, she also specializes in other family law matters including prenuptial and postnuptial agreements, as well as the enforcement of premarital and post-marital agreements.
Follow me on Facebook and Instagram:
/ familylawcalifornia
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Legal Disclaimer: This video is for informational purposes only and not for the purpose of providing legal advice. This is not legal advice, nor can I give you legal advice. You should contact your attorney to obtain advice for your matter. Nothing in this video should be construed to form an attorney-client relationship.
Can someone record their spouse if they’re being physically or mentally abused? Why is it hard to get a straight answer? And how would any victim ever be able to get any evidence besides that? It makes zero sense.
How do I e file to remove a dv restraint order. What application 300orfl400? And what filing code. Lps Angeles court. 🙏?
how does a restraining order work with a child involved
Are parents still allow to talk
Is it true that the child support collected is matched dollar for dollar by the federal government to support the child family services dept or whatever it is officially called?
You didn't cover DV-105 Child Custody in this video which is a big part of the DV-100. Just wondering if someone checks the "no" box on DV-105 part 7 and they know this is a lie bc they know their is an existing order, that's perjury/fraud right? Also on the DV-100 part 4 "are you involved in any other court case" box is checked "yes" but only for "TRO" does not tell the court about existing custody/visitation order from Virginia. This is material omission perjury. Intentionally deceived the court to gain an advantage in custody/visitation.
Yes, you are correct in stating that misleading the court goes against credibility. If the witnesses is not credible, the court will put less weight on their other allegations.
@@DianaRomanovska thank you, so the best thing to do is file an MC-030 Declaration Statement explaining the intentional material omission that has been discovered? That's what the judge is telling me to do is file a declaration statement.. it's basically a fraud/perjury complaint that I have written up..
I’m close to the Bay Area & currently have a DVO of 5yrs that will be up in 2024. When I went on to my county website, I read that the 2nd time you go to renew the order, it could possibly be permanent. Is this true? It would be such a relief to not have to return every few years to renew & move on with my life. Thank you for the information as well, you made it very clear. 👏🏼
Yes it's perjury but the family courts see lying daily and rarely pursue charges. they do use it for credibility
You cannot record anyone secretly by law
In California, it's generally illegal to record a confidential conversation without the consent of all parties involved, as per California Penal Code Section 632. However, there is an exception to this rule related to the gathering of evidence of certain serious crimes.
California Penal Code Section 633.5 states:
"Nothing in Section 631, 632, 632.5, 632.6, or 632.7 prohibits one party to a confidential communication from recording the communication for the purpose of obtaining evidence reasonably believed to relate to the commission by another party to the communication of the crime of extortion, kidnapping, bribery, any felony involving violence against the person, including, but not limited to, human trafficking, as defined in Section 236.1, or a violation of Section 653m. Nothing in Section 631, 632, 632.5, 632.6, or 632.7 renders any evidence so obtained inadmissible in a prosecution for extortion, kidnapping, bribery, any felony involving violence against the person, including, but not limited to, human trafficking, as defined in Section 236.1, a violation of Section 653m, or any crime in connection therewith."
This means that if you reasonably believe that recording the conversation will provide evidence of a felony involving violence against a person (which would include most forms of domestic violence), you may be permitted to record without the other party's consent.
However, it's crucial to consult with an attorney about your specific situation before recording someone without their consent, as the implications can be serious.
What happens if someone lies and makes a material omission on the DV-100? DV-105 child custody part 7 specifically... Lies about an existing custody order... That's perjury right?
See my answer above
@@DianaRomanovska I can tell you what happened now. After they changed the judge 3 times in my case and after I submitted declaration statement mc-030 as told to do by the clerk of dept 403, the 3rd judge had no idea what was happening in my case, probably didn't read any of my filed statements, didn't ask to see any evidence or proof of the claims of harassment or abuse, didn't care that another court in Virginia already debunked the basis to uphold a restraining order, the piece of shit judge didn't care that the other party was found GUILTY of Contempt of Court when asked to SHOW CAUSE of violating an existing custody order. That judge is a piece of shit clown and I would tell him that to his face. I cited 2 laws under California family code 3443 and 3453 that existing custody orders from another state SHALL be given full faith and credit and need not be re-confirmed.