The Day Nadal DESTROYED Federer's Dream! (SILENCING 15,000 HATERS)
Vložit
- čas přidán 26. 02. 2023
- Hope you enjoy today's video! Don't forget to DROP A LIKE & Subscribe for more original Tennis content!
12 years ago, Roger Federer showed the Novak Djokovic who's the boss by ending his 41 legendary winning streak! In the final, Federer faced Rafael Nadal for the 5th time & everyone thought he had a big chance to do the impossible and beat Rafa!
"Act of 4 February 1994 on Copyright and Related Rights
This video is fair use under U.S. copyright law because it is noncommercial and transformative in nature, uses no more of the original than necessary, and has no negative effect on the market for the original work." - Sport
I grew up with John Mac and Jimmy Conners...but now at age 60 I have seen two of the greatest for a lifetime. Their immense respect for each other is heartwarming. Thanks for another great vid. Your intros and out takes are epic.
Thank you so much, Jaim! Glad you're enjoying your time on the channel ❤️
So proud to see your generation online
@@faviovillfane5355 thanks...I'd never want to leave finding all this great content. This channel is one of my top 3.
Rafael Nadal favourite slam is French open.
Federer favorite slam is Wimbledon
Djokovic favorite slam is Australian open
Federer and Djokovic failed to beat Rafael Nadal at French open and rule French open for years like Nadal
@@WivoRN hey did you posted the video of Rafael Nadal best fan moments and rafas funny moments and now it got deleted due to copyright
Best ever version of roger on clay courts without a shadow of a doubt... His match against novak and the first 3 sets vs rafa in finals were the best ever.. The finals match really deserved a 5th set
He got breadsticked in his best ever clay match?
@@davidwsw I clearly told first 3 sets... Read my comment properly🤦♂️
@@davidwsw in short answer is yes
Keep eating b chicken vijay. That is all you are good for
@@davidwsw that’s just how big Nadal is on clay, no one is gonna debate that
This was epic match! Just what Goran ivanisevic said " I've seen roger at his best at wimbledon on the grass, Novak at his best at australia but nothing compares to Rafa at Roland Garros"
Rafa earned the respect of the frenchs (even though France and Spain aren’t “friends”). Now he’s claimed and clapped in every single moment. Now he’s older, everyone wants him to win (as they did with Roger in this match).
Scary thing is, Federer at RG 2011 played at a much higher level than he did in 2009. Yet, he couldn't get his hands on La Coupe des Mousquetaires for the 2nd time.
This makes me appreciate Rafa so much to pull that comeback in the first set trailing 2-5 to win it 7-5. Hope he does it again this year at RG. Fingers crossed 🤞🏻
dude that final after wimbledon 2019 was the 2nd hardest match loss as a fed fan :( He played at a god level vs djokovic that semifinal. I remember watching it while I lived in spain as a kid and EVERYONE loved federer that day in Spain for beating djokovic, and then they switched back to root for nadal winning xD
Lmao
@@seankeegan8285 It was good for Novax because playing Nadal in the final of RG is mission Impossible as always.
he is not there in 2023 rg ..
@@prasadwt270 yes, unfortunately he won't play this year. And his participation in RG 2024 is also a big question mark at this point. It all depends on how does Rafa's body holds up for maybe one last push for glory. Not getting up my hopes for a positive outcome this time though.
Rodger played extremely well. Such a privilege to watch them play for 12-13 years at such a high level.
Always got so hyped seeing the big 4 all in the semi finals.
This was a turning point in Roger's career. Yes this was Roger's best chance at beating Rafa in the French, but it was also Roger's 5th final here and it would be his last. Afterwards, Roger never made FO finals again. His latter years were all Wimbledon and AO (with one lone USO final).
I guess Federer never believed in winning that match. He played amazing tennis for 3 sets and he was even hesitating celebrating his biggest winners as if he couldn't believe what was happening.Also he got unlucky in various close calls that could easily change the course of that match
I have watched Fedal since 2004. On clay especially on RG, Roger never believed he could beat Nadal. That was as close as he possibly got to Nadal, losing n 4, close sets. Especially given his previous demolition against Nadal in 2009 definitely most talented among 3, but the weakest mentally. He lost 2 important matches against Novak too having mp.
@@sumanchowdhury6162 well said,most talented but weakest mentally
Gents, why are u on Fed's case here. Wasnt Fed playing the guy that has a 91% career winning rate on this surface, 97% on this tournament. Are u disregarding the skills of his opponent. Fed is going to beat him because he' believes that he can'. Come on. Even if he won the 1st set, that doesnt mean he could have won. After everything you have seen over the years from this surface. You must know that he tried his best, even if he believed more, he would still have been met with higher resistance. SW19 2019 is another case altogether. That one is😔
@@sumanchowdhury6162 On clay and especially on RG, Federer is no match for Nadal.
@@tano2775 yes and as a Nadal fan myself I can say the biggest threat to Nadal on clay will always be Djokovic
Incredible to watch this piece from history. Federer attempts multiple 1-2 punches and Rafa hits a ridiculous passing shot each time. WITH EASE.
I will never tire of watching these two play.
Until 5-2 in the first set, Federer played one of the cleanest games of tennis ive ever seen him play , and i watch him since 2003. He had a clear vision of how the rallies must go and considering the overall score, this is the only RG match between the 2 that he could have won, maybe in 4 sets too. But that drop shot at set point was a mistake
Even in the second and third sets he played very well. He might have even won in 3. But again, just like Wimbledon 2019, mistakes on key points are what killed him.
Yeah but look who was on the other side of the net.
It's not that hard to figure it out. Rafa is working on RG #15. let that sink in.
Federer fans are clowns
Winning the first set at RG doesn't mean much
He simply doesn't have what it takes to outplay Nadal there in a best of 5
Nadal took advantage of that rain disrupt during the 2nd set. Roger is the better player this match
@@Phurngirathaana Ofc he did. Federer was the better player this match in the first 3 sets and should have won this match in straight sets. He beat the best player in the world, who would have destroyed Nadal in the final. Federer was the real FO 2011 winner in my book.
Never seen two other competitors love each other so much. If only other professionals could behave this way, it would be so beautiful.
They don't love each other though. Federer cried like a baby at the 2009AO F trophy ceremony.
Nadal did not invite Federer to his 2019 wedding, for example. Because they aren't friends but they were business partners when they both worked for NIKE. NIKE made commercials of them being "friendly" because they both were NIKE brand ambassadors and employees of NIKE. It is like how NIKE a few years ago kept promoting Raducanu and Nadal being "best friends" when all they really did was pay Raducanu to wear Nadal's NIKE gear for PR and commercial/advertisement reasons.
Hahahaha.......!
As great as Rafa is on clay, Federer had no reason to not win this match. Rafa didn't look his best in that tournament (lost 2 sets to Isner) while Federer had taken out the most in-form player in the world. That semifinal match against Djokovic is very memorable for me as it was the first tennis match I ever watched and the one that made me a fan of Federer. I watched it with a friend and his family (who were rooting for Djokovic).
That never looked like a clay court match... It was like a hard court match and that match is a proof on what can roger can do if he is strong from baseline cutting down his unforced errors... He was too hot to handle for a player who was on a 41 match unbeaten streak
"Federer had no reason to not win this match"
But did he have a reason to win it? What's with all this double negative gobbledygook
You had just started watching tennis lol
Federer lost in 4 sets with the 4th set being 6-1 and you think he should have won?🤣🤣🤣
U are a city fan , probably started watching sports in 2021 . As i can't believe u started to watch tennis before football , why lying that you are watching it since a decade?? New fans are always welcomed but not if they are liars lol
@@Phurngirathaana You probably turned it on in the fourth set 🤣🤣 Federer was outplaying Rafa for much of the first 3 sets but lost important points and that cost him. Same with Wimbledon 2019.
You have added so much to my tennis experience and deep appreciation of Rafa's indominable spirit. Thank you!
Thank you for the constant support, Susan!
that was Federer's best chance to defeat Rafa at the French
Wivo, thanks again. Do you happen to have this full match? Do you know if it’s online anywhere that it can be watched? I LOVE your channel!!! You’re the best! ❤️
Thank you for the constant support Joyce, it really helps a lot :))
Yes, could you hit me up on twitter @wivorn or Instagram @wivorn1? I'll send you the full match.
Federers biggest weakness has always been his inability - when having the advantage to not always use it Example , his conversion rate on break points is at the lower % when compared with his contemporaries .
Change this - and he could have ended his career well ahead of his rivals
That aside - his game style was still the best to watch - versatile , often creative and flowing - the world will miss him 👌
I wouldn't have changed a thing about Federer as he was the most entertaining of the three to watch. Also couldn't care less if the other two finish with more GS, as this does not in any way diminish Fed's career in which he provided plenty of highlights.
Xhfllly
3:13 I swear, that looks IN to me!
It might look in during the wide angled shot, but look again at the slow motion closer shot. It's clearly out.
you have the best intro and closing
Thank you ❤️ ❤️
where did you get that tune at the end ! It's freaking epic ! Could you please site song or artist name ? Thanks amazing content by the way
Absolutely,
The two are:
Naruto rainy days remix by ksolis,
Naruto rainy day remix by besidue
It's really tough for anyone to win any tournament especially when you faces consecutively 2 of the big 3
You mean to tell me that Federer was expected to beat Nadal, although he lost 4 matches already on RG to Rafa? Sorry to say this, but Rafa was living rent free in Roger’s head thanks to the clay. The outcome of the first 2 sets here proves it. Had they not played so many matches on clay at the beginning of their rivalry, Roger might have had a chance against him in this final. The mental edge was so in favour of Rafa at that time.
He always seems to come up short in that aspect of his mental fortitude, we've seen it many times.
I don't believe that federer was to win this title. But sure the match could have gone into a fifth set. Federer was better at the first set he didn't play well when he served for it.
And he Roger Federer destroyed Nada's dreams in Wimbledon 2006 and Australian open in 2017
I still can't believe isner almost put Rafa out
incontestablement le meilleur match et la meilleur finale de federer a rolland et prtant ca n a pas suffit en face en finale il est tt bonnement ingerable personne n y est jamais arrivé en ...14 tentatives
I spite of the heart breaking loss, Roger lightly tapped Rafa. No overt animosity.
The guy named Rafa Nadal made the great Roger looked like Robinsoderling .. the guy at Rolandgarros is like Undertaker at WrestleMania... He just can't loose
This guy is good
In all fairness after the final Roger looked extremely happy and content. He knew he got the job done after that GOAT ly performance against Novak. And he's so touchy with Rafa at that ceremony it's kinda weird lol.
Rafa is just out of the world on clay...
Nobody can defeat goat
The stadium was evenly divided maybe slightly towards Roger. Rafa doesn't have significant amount of haters.
Best of 5 RG Rodger knew he'd have to play the same way he beat nole to have the slightest chance in hell
Roger should have gone to a bigger size racquet way earlier. The one Roger was using here was only 90sq.inch. He then went up to a frame that was 97sq. inch. It gave him more power on the back hand and allowed him to drive the ball better. That's how he defeated Rafa in the finals of the Australian Open in 2017.
Nah! He only just managed to beat a very exhausted rafa in 2017 AO OPEN final... as rafa got older he got slower as was not able to make roger play that extra shot, that's why roger was able to beat him as they got older.. racket size wouldn't have saved him in his younger days
@@kingbiceps5218 Of course, as Roger got older, he became faster! Clown!
@@edkiely2712 If the semifinals had been played on the same day, Nadal would have been the champion.
@@tano2775 If the bullfrog had wings, he could fly!
@@edkiely2712 Nadal had a playstyle that relied on physical attributes much more than Federer which is why Federer aged better than Nadal
One thing I always noticed in Fed’s matches against Rafa and Novak (he lost) that he almost always started like a rocket but gradually fizzled out as the match grew deeper.
I agree
Rafa’s head to head in grand slams is what makes him legend
8:02 🔥🔥
please 1080p
I still think to this day that Federer got screwed on that out call on set point on 2-5. I saw white dust blow up in the air above where the ball bounced
lines aren't made of dirt, so white dust wouldnt blow up if it hit the line. Lines are made of like some hard surface that doesn't have dust.
The pain Federer gave to Nadal in Wimbledon 2007 finals is unbearable also
7-6,4-6,7-6,2-6,6-2
Rafael Nadal lost to Roger Federer.
The pain Djokovic gave to Nadal is also painful and hurtful in Wimbledon
6-4,3-6,7-6,3-6,10-8
Rafael Nadal lost to Djokovic
The pain Djokovic gave to Nadal in Australian open 2012 finals is hurtful
5-7,6-4,6-2,6-7,7-5
The pain Federer gave to Nadal in Australian open 2017 finals.
6-4,3-6,6-1,3-6,6-3
Rafael Nadal lost 3 Grandslam finals and 1 Grandslam semifinals to his biggest rivals like Federer and Djoko.
Atp finals 2010 finals
Atp finals 2020 semifinals
Miami masters 2005 finals
Miami masters 2011 finals
Wimbledon 2011 finals is also painful
Due to mental block against Djokovic in 2011.
6-4,6-1,1-6,6-3 Rafael Nadal lost.
Australian open 2014 finals
Rafael Nadal played with back injury against player who is never beated him in grandslam final or semifinals
Rafael Nadal is not weak player at all he is one of the greatest 🎾 player in open era and greatest clay court player of all time in the open era also.
I agree Djokovic is undisputed goat of 🎾 sport who have potential to win more major titles than Rafael Nadal in open era due to his health and body.
As much as I love Fed, the only reason Federer was able to beat Djokovic the way he did and dominate Nadal for the first 3 sets the way he did here was because 2011 Roland Garros played more like a medium hardcourt than a clay court that year. The balls were blazing fast and the court didn't really slow them down enough to properly resemble a clay court.
This is definitely the best match from Nadal on clay
Con Ñ siempre donde estéis.
Changing history with a few centimeters.
🐐👑🥺❤
There is only one king in clay #RAFA
Roger never had a chance against Nadal on clay. A lot of comments that make no sense. The high ball to fed's backhand only got better until 2017. The only player that could handle high balls with ohb was wawrinka. The match was lost before it even started.
Roger is ultimate choker! How the f he lost that first set...
Rafa had Feds number right from the start, 10-4 in grand slams is a total domination.
The conditions changed in this match which did not help Roger I think. The balls tend to fly through the court better when it is sunnier. I remember a few rain breaks for this match.
Most of the points were lost when Roger left the baseline and tried to rush the net and got passed or couldn't hit the perfect volley ... even though beating Nadal in baseline rallies at RG is the toughest task Roger should have stayed back and chosen more carefully which ones to finish at the net,...obviously this is easier to say ..however i 'm pointing out here because this was the exact sort of gameplan he employed in AO 17 final...waiting for the right moment to go to the net ... i think he sort of lost it after 5-2 when that drop shot felt wide.. and then when you lose 5 straight games from 5-2 to losing 5-7 i guess Roger was just sort of holding his game in sets 2 and 3 . he was still good enough .... but not as good as the 1st set until 5-2 ...with such a mentality when you have to go toe to toe with Nadal and win set 3 ..i guess it was too much for Roger from set 4 onwards and he got breadsticked..still even if he had won the 1st set it would have been difficult to say whether he would have won overall...because since he did not win 1st set he was at a high level until set 3 because he wanted to win a set and then it became too much... am saying this as a Roger fan..as beating Rafa in RG was one of the most toughest task...
In 2006 also he had won the first set and still lost in 4..
Not True..its just head, few first gems he took it with many net aproaches 🫣
Roger still had doubts
I think Federer is the player that missed the most important occasions ton win Grand Slams
No, he was beaten and that is all.
@@tano2775 Nope. Federer was without question the better player in the first three sets and should have won this match in straight sets. Don’t forget that Federer took out the player that would have destroyed Nadal in this final. Let that sink in.
@@jacobschmidt2709 Nobody could defeat Nadal in RG final, 2011 Novak definitely would have gone to 5 sets if he met Nadal but no way he is destroying Nadal.
Federer simply doesn't have what it takes to beat Nadal consistently on clay. He has like 2 wins against Nadal on clay in like 20 matches. Nadal simply owns Federer on clay.
@@expert-editz Djokovic in 2011 was to Nadal the same as what Nadal on clay was to Federer for their whole careers. I think taking out Djokovic in SF was the biggest favor Roger did to Nadal, Djokovic would have obliterated Nadal like he did for the whole 2011, including Madrid and Rome
Incredible turnaround in the first set, Fed missed the drop shot by a few centimetres 3:09, then Rafa won 7 games in a row
Here, Rafa had won 4 of the last 5 slams 🔥
There was no belief in Fed body language even when he was up 5-2. Also you’re not gonna win against Rafa on clay by going to the net. Huge mental block for Fed
Federer did not have a chance against Nadal on clay because of his one handed backhand
Roger played at very high level in this final, without a doubt. Couple big points won here and there and the result could have been very different.
6-1 !!!
Why does this thumbnail make Rafa look like he has a blonde mohawk😂
El primer set tuvo set point para cerrarlo 63. El segundo jugaron un tiebreak. El tercero lo ganó 75.
Faltó poco Roger.
Rafa is a goat 🔥🔥
one hand back hand is week against nadal style
Federer got screwed in that crucial call that was called out
Fed could have won it in 3 straight sets but Rafa was exceptional 🙌🏻
What does that even mean lmao ??? How could have federer won it in 3 sets if Rafa was exceptional. I understand English is the third language in INDIA so probably some issue there
@@Valverde-rh1wm Federer didn't really have anything to hurt Nadal on clay, don't pay attention to the Fed fanboys. Djokovic is the only one who consistently challenges Nadal on clay, and even he got demolished in 2020.
Federer's 2-3 wins against Nadal shows how he fared against the Spaniard.
@@Valverde-rh1wmjajaja, m has quitado las palabras d la boca xq pienso lo mismo q tú
The craziest thing is this was Nadal's sixth French Open trophy. He would win 8 more after this one!!!
Nadal Was so dangerous on clay back in those days
..as though he's any less now
That’s one of the dumbest comments I’ve ever heard…. 🙄
Fedrer had won first set by 6-2 but lineman error at 5-2 40-15 cost him the set and match
Roger is such a choker against Rafa on clay it's amazing to see. Also against Djokovic in grand slams while having 40-15 in match points. That's the only negative thing in his career. Without it he would've been easily the best ever officially.
For me he's the best ever anyway no Matter how many titles they'll have. But some people love this stat and he blew it unfortunately...
Rafa was in Roger's head but not just on clay. It needs to be remembered that Rafa beat Roger on all three surfaces in grand slams & Roger only beat Rafa at Wimbledon in 2006 and 2007. Then Roger finally won another slam match in Melbourne in 2017 & again at Wimbledon in their final match in 2019. Rafa was a better player at their respective peaks, but Roger was unclear how to play against Nadal until Melbourne 2017. On clay Rafa's advantages were such that at Roland Garros it was close to Mission Impossible for Roger.
Post 2006, this was the best chance Federer had to beat Rafa at the French Open.
I think his backhand was working well too.
But his inability to play his best tennis on big points against Rafa/Nole cost him again.
The rain delay also helped him to get back in the second set, yet he wasn't able to take advantage.
The conditions got heavier after the rain which meant no major top spin for Rafa, still he wasn't able to win even though he was playing well.
On one hand it shows how difficult it is to beat Rafa at the French Open. But it also shows how difficult it is to overcome the lack of belief if you have lost always to an opponent on a surface.
Just as Federer always had confidence against Roddick, Hewitt. Rafa has that against Federer.
Nonetheless, great performance from Roger overall and a great match to see.
We will never know if 2011 Novak could have beaten Nadal that year at the French
He blew it. He has his chance given that Nadal was nowhere near his best in 2011.
How mad is it to think that this is nowhere close to being the worst final loss for Federer?
2nd and 3rd for sure
It’s so weird hearing Rafa being booed. He is one of the most respectful/polite players in the circuit.
Le rafa le meilleur
Still Federer ruled this sport unlike any other!
First set: What happened? Did Rafa suddenly wake up after seven games?
Second set: RF unforced errors and Rafa winners about even.
Third set: No comment.
Fourth set: Clearly Rafa. (I've seen RF better but,...)
Rafa just better that day.
Not that it matters now, but I always thought if Fed had just switched to a 2 handed backhand, he would have had a chance against Nadal on Clay.
Although i am a huge Federer fan yet i m of the view that his biggest weakness is: 1 his inability to hit cross court shots 2 :his very low conversion rate of break points n 3 : lack of self confidence at crucial points specially against Djokovic n Nadal otherwise he is a player to be born once in a century.
He had everything in his game : class, elegance, beautiful service, his ability to serve aces consistently , footwork , drop shots, over head lobs. You know he could make the game so easy n keep the point short. If he could curtail his above mentioned weaknesses, he could easily 6 more grand slams.
😂😂😂
If you watch carefully, Federer by this time had suffered permanent mental damage when facing Nadal at RG. He knew his game couldn't deal with a player like Nadal on this surface. Even a solid game like Djokivic's wouldn't win against Nadal when he's playing well at RG.
Nadal is lucky by taking advantage of that rain disrupt during 2nd set. Roger is clearly the better player.
Federer completely fell apart, after that drop shot set point. He is rushed and anxious afterwards. 2-5 to 7-5. Djokovic and Nadal simply don't throw away those kinds of leads. It's telling time and time again, when you watch his matches back. Every Time the doubts surfaced, they took hold.
I know this comment is unrelated to this video. Novak has just said, in an interview, he hopes to meet Rafa in a Roland Garros final once again. Apparently, Djokovic has ambitions.
Well Rafa is out of shape, too many injuries and oldness made him weak recently. So I guess Djokovic prefers to face Nadal this year than ten or five years ago
@@lawrencejauseau3569 they have been facing
It's impossible to win against a young and healthy Nadal in Roland Garros
Yeah Nole is an ambitious man, he has the gut to say and do the things he speaks out. But beating Rafa in RG final is something impossible in tennis, just like Nole in AO final. They can play bad in the early rounds but when coming to the final, it's a very different story. So I think it's better for Nole if he faces Rafa in QF or SF.
@@latingdmc It's from his most recent interview. I think it was to a Serbian reporter.
federer choked, like he did many times
I don't know if I will watch tennis after novak and nadal retire.
Federer played nowhere near the level he played against djokovic, he got pretty nervous
Do the impossible is 👍 right
It's really disappointing that Federer lost the final set 6-1. Unlike Djokovic he could not even take Rafa to five sets never mind best him.
Yeah, Rafa and Novak push Roger at Wimby. Novak is the only person to beat Rafa more than one time at RG. That showed Novak level is way above everybody else also Rafa is almost impossible to beat at RG that is insanely scary domination.
So what does that tell you about Federer? He wasn't as good as the other 2 titans.😁
@@pdcdesign9632 I would never say that, Roger lead the way for Rafa and Novak, as Sampras lead the way for Roger. Roger is still the best shot maker of all time and best racket handling skill and of course 20GS to back it up with. But I can’t help thinking sometime he gave up mentally when he play Novak and Rafa.
@@pdcdesign9632 on clay perhaps.
@@phyotennis7462 he did seem to crack at times which is a shame.
Threw it away in the first set
Perdonar Don Rafa Nadal no se Jubiló.Vamos Chatin Vamos Pequeño Aprendiz Vamos siempre nos quedará París.Vamos
Rafa taking medicals when hes down
I wonder now many slams Roger would have if Nadal didn’t play tennis
Probably 30
El Miércoles 17 no vemos Futuros Ingenieros de Minas y Energía.
Estudiar más
So who's the "15,000 haters" exactly? I guess it all depends which tennis player you prefer then those who prefer and support the other guy are the "hater's" in your world. Not exactly the best way of making friends and influencing people....
So Roger retires never having beaten Rafa at RG. RG is a different sort of beast to conquer it seems. Sampras never got one. Edberg. Becker. True giants of tennis. Never got one. Roger got his but not through Rafa. And only once.
Ya
Rafa Nadal is like the Real Madrid in the finals...once in finals, they are champions. 14/17 the Real, 22/30 Nadal 👀
Prime Federer never came close to taking down Nadal at the French Open but pre-prime Nadal took down prime Federer at Wimbeldon in 2008 + came really close in 2007..
Only beat Fed once in four outings on grass. In fact holds a losing record against him on all other surfaces, so the only thing your post proves is that Nadal is only better on clay. Big deal.
@ Snookerfool: Rafa leads Federer on outdoor HC too
Federer is the one out of prime in 2011 and 2008 and Nadal at prime in 2008 but out of prime in 2011. But when it comes to clay, especially Roland Garros Fed simply can't beat Nadal(losing to Nadal from 2005 all the way to 2008). Nadal on the other hand, can't beat Fed in fast courts. Wimbledon has slowed down quite a bit by 2008 giving Nadal the opportunity to beat Fed in "green clay" grass
@Yussepi G By two matches, hardly definitive evidence is it. Especially since he lost his last four "outdoor HC" outings to Federer once he upgraded his bh. Who's the fool now?
@stanley extra Yet he still lost to Fed at Wimbledon in 2019. Also, Nadal was at his peak until 2013 when he achieved his highest ever ELO rating.
It’s clay and Rafa so …
That fucken ball in 3:12 how everything change in a moment i can’t resist myself to think if just roger could take the first set
Fed should win this one, he was better, almost unstoppable, but Rafa is not the king of clay for nothing
You make no sense. Usually the winner of the match is better for a reason.
@@pdcdesign9632 you dont understand what i said. I say that Roger was better THIS DAY… but i also said that Rafa is the king of clay and the experience he had allowed him to be better, more consistant on the match… that is Why he is the king of clay, he found the ressources to win.